different executors that
will make it easier to port oslo.messaging to Py3K without depending
on the support of it for eventlet / gevent.
I just created this:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/asyncio-executor
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp55WNmmCkAb.pgp
Descri
lot when designing APIs and
seeking for stability.
Projects throughout OpenStack look for re-usable code in Oslo first -
or at least I think they should - and then elsewhere. Putting things
in oslo-incubator has also a community impact, not just technical
benefits. IMHO.
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Perc
remove the
'glance/notifier' package which was replaced with 'glance/notifier.py'
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpemy6SpW8wz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
e's still no blueprint but I created this[0] etherpad where we
could start writing the needs for Heat and other templates.
I agree with Mark. I don't think Glance should expand much further
beyond the Nova / Heat stack and akin.
[0] https://etherpad
ion like the one you proposed?
Also, something to consider is that using something like
`get_config_from_dict` would help delaying the decision as to whether
oslo.messaging should depend on oslo.config. This change is a big,
breaking change and if we don't take a final decision now, we
www.amqp.org/specification/1.0/amqp-org-download
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgphtaFMSwwzY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
re
those task sent back to `nova-scheduler` for re-scheduling?
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpxwNJGKluLo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
good is the highest law." -- Cicero
GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpc
On 10/12/13 12:15 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:29 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 16:05 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Sounds sane to me.
To put it another way, assuming all AMQP 1.0 client libraries are equal,
all the operator cares about is that we have a driver
Which means right now every glance patch that goes into the gate will
100% fail, and will cause 45-60 minute delay to every other project in
the gate as your change has to fail out of the queue.
Hey Sean,
Thanks for the heads up!
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpAFDNi3w0J
On 11/12/13 09:31 -0500, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 12/10/13 at 11:09am, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/13 17:37 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/09/2013 05:16 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/09/2013 07:15 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
[...]
One other pattern that can benefit from intermediated
ntributing the most
3- Then filter by TC / ALL / OSSN etc
4- The quick look at other subjects
5- Finally, mark all as read.
I'm pretty sure you can do this with most of the known email clients
out there. FWIW, I'm using mutt+offlineimap+notmuch
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
p
ated project. Until those projects don't
graduate, the program won't be official nor will have the 'rights' of
other programs. And if the project fits into another program, then it
won't be officially part of it until it
On 13/12/13 10:44 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/13/2013 10:37 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/12/13 15:53 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
TL;DR: Incubation is getting harder, why not ask efforts to apply
for a new program first to get the visibility they need to grow.
Long
shaved off by using something like
AMQP or STOMP might not be justified for its added complexity.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@fla
On 13/12/13 16:37 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/12/13 15:53 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
TL;DR:
Incubation is getting harder, why not ask efforts to apply for a new
program first to get the visibility they need to grow.
Long version:
Last cycle we introduced the concept of
FF
[0]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/amqp10-driver-implementation
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpC9dVaHQWAk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/
rm scope duplication.
** Project should leverage existing functionality in other OpenStack projects
as much as possible
How would something like:
** Project must have a clear and defined scope which, in turn, represents
a measured and obvious progression for OpenStack as a whole
sou
On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be
implemented and how to map the current expectations of the messaging
layer to the new protocol.
I think a separate thread to discuss this ma
On 17/12/13 11:54 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote:
1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't
be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated
projects have.
I don't agree on this point.
ficial right away, lets give them a place where they can grow a bit
with the projects the have under their umbrella. Lets also - as Mark
suggested - use that place to add comments and help them grow.
And I'm also in favor of having a emerging pr
On 17/12/13 14:22 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/17/2013 01:53 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be
implemented and how to map the current expectatio
'm leaning towards (3) at the moment. Thoughts ?
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pg
ease
cycle works and it'll also help the TC to review the work going on in
the project based on the OpenStack milestones.
Also, incubated projects can ask for reviews / support at anytime.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp80J9z8s_ZD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
sts.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpbi1gy9OB8q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
o what Glance's
program covers.
[0] https://github.com/openstack/glance/tree/master/glance/store/
Thoughts?
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSaOGX3Qu0u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@list
On 21/12/13 00:41 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/20/2013 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
In the last Glance meeting, it was proposed to pull out glance's
stores[0] code into its own package. There are a couple of other
scenarios where using this code is necessary and it could al
On 23/12/13 07:57 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/23/2013 05:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 21/12/13 00:41 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
Cinder is for block storage. Images are just a bunch of blocks, and
all the store drivers do is take a chunked stream of input blocks and
On 23/12/13 09:00 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/23/2013 08:48 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jay Pipes mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 12/23/2013 05:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 21/12/13 00:41 -050
On 23/12/13 22:46 +0800, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 23/12/13 09:00 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/23/2013 08:48 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jay Pipes mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 12/2
projects. However, I'd encourage to keep common tags
documented somewhere, perhaps this common tags shouldn't be part of
the `Tags:` 'field', which you already mentioned above.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpApEvIIWXr1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
ready to be reviewed - which I bet you do since
you already submitted a patch - please, set a target milestone and
series. That'll make it pop-up into the BPs review process.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1AuikxNtkz.pgp
Description: PGP
-dd-performance
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp_jkgxEzCa6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing lis
On 02/01/14 11:17 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 26/12/13 20:05 +0200, Sergey Skripnick wrote:
Hi all,
I'm surprised there is no common ssh library in oslo so I filed this
blueprint[0]. I would be hap
.5 release.
;( Tears of happiness!!!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpyC0kCl3QHz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Just a gentle reminder. Please, remember to the subject of the emails.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgptFnbJDCsYT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org
support of encryption.
I like the idea of a config registry but as mentioned above, IMHO it's
to live under its own project.
That's all I've got for now,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpeZ2M6TmKBW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On 09/01/14 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Just a gentle reminder. Please, remember to the subject of the emails.
Erm, I obviously meant 'to tag the subject'*
Sorry, too sleepy.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpD5k5khTAQA.pgp
Description: PGP
mmitments from as many PTLs as possible
that they'll both directly participate in the day, as well as
encourage the rest of their project to do the same.
Count me in!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpWDB5w_BxEu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
was not installed afterwards, either. I am guessing that the package install
step is getting skipped somehow, after the first run.
I just updated the patch with the latest feedback from this thread.
Could you give it a try again?
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp
.conf and seeing 696 options is not what I would call user friendly.
And also having working default. I know it's hard, but we should really
try to think about that sometimes.
Sorry to hijack the thread a bit.
IMHO, not a hijack!
+100 to this!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgplZ7SGvB4XG.pgp
D
On 09/01/14 13:28 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:23 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 08/01/14 17:13 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>Hi folks
>
>OpenStack process tend to have many config options, and many hosts.
>It is a pain to manage this tons of config options.
>To
On 10/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/01/14 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
I also think projects should try to minimize configuration options at
their minimum so operators are completely lost. Opening the sample
nova.conf and seeing 696 options is not
valuated in a per-project basis. But:
- What are the thoughts of other folks on this matter?
Cheers,
FF
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62911/
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpgyYiD83_0e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev m
ll also force projects to be
updated to the latest version of those modules in oslo-incubator,
which is safer, IMHO.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpASQS9677rL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
sync happened would be fantastic. :-)
We should keep it in the openstack-modules.conf file and put it in the
commit message as well. IMHO.
FF
-Ben
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/01/14 12:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
[..
very quickly.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42878/
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp302nNOA49v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
y Laboratory in Beijing
-
Inactive hide details for Mark Washenberger ---01/15/2014 08:16:39 AM---This
time, with content! On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:51 AMark Washenberger ---01/15/
2014 08:16:39 AM---This time, with content! On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:51 AM,
Flavi
me!
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpHwpUyOGdp1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
commit but it's easier to check that
file. (Pretty much like submodules do).
And if we ever need to do something with that, it'll be easier to get
the sha from the config file. This argument violates YAGNI, though... :D
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpg2_2UF3e1S.pgp
D
ndpoint -
and whatever subset of functionality could be exposed in higher level
abstractions (such as a CLI). Bonus is that horizon could potentially use this
work.
This one last point is very important as well. The levels of
abstraction of the common SDK and CLI shouldn't prevent servi
ment. FWIW, backwards compatibility is always considered
in all Oslo reviews and if there's a crazy-breaking change, it's
always notified.
Thankfully, this all will be alleviated with the libs that are being
pulled out from the incubator. The syncs will contain fewer module
the backtrace of invalid token'
Regard!
Lee Li
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpIWWXjn
r contribution. I commented on Gerrit.
Cheers,
FF
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp6Yc28Gn3BN.
On 21/01/14 13:14 -0500, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2014-01-16 13:48, John Griffith wrote:
Hey Everyone,
A review cam
man/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1bpGlNdhXH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
s matter after I-2. Not sure
when it'll happen but it'll be a perfect time to discuss this further.
Cheers,
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpv4mSdRVkCi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
tack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpCMoxOfF9LI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Greetings,
I was digging into some test failures in the gate (my fault, nothing
to do with the gate) and I realized that the configuration files of
the projects are exported along with the logs.
Is the above true? Or am I missing something?
If so, is it possible to export config files as well?
_
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://list
On 25/01/14 10:57 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-01-23 16:52:53 +0100 (+0100), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
If so, is it possible to export config files as well?
[...]
Patch functions.sh(cleanup_host) in openstack-infra/devstack-gate to
copy the files of interest into $BASE/logs/ and
penstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSlE8YddAPK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
_
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@li
tinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpvPFGFDmjyf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpaxQeDoq4aT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
t?
[1] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1255622
[2] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1246200
-Mike Perez
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@
On 03/02/14 10:13 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
store nodes where the image should be downloaded from. That is,
selecting the nearest location from the image locations and
On 03/02/14 12:44 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 17:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/02/14 10:13 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
>On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the
>> st
stigating it but
try to make it not nova specific.
[...]
Cheers,
Fla.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpBkffPcCNXX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
:)
Thanks a lot for raising these questions and for reviewing the API
v1.1 spec.
Cheers,
Fla.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpM0AN3lxcQR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
).
It's worth noting that you can't upload images to Cinder - meaning,
create volumes by uploading images to Glance - yet.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp64T1frieP4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/openstack/common/db/sqlalchemy/session.py#L329
Cheers,
Fla
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpHbm4UKm_HE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
, please respond with a +1 or –1.
+1 ;)
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpvo4CXSQjoO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
pt
it for OpenStack projects.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp5tTZfl8cnC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
On 18/11/14 18:46 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 18/11/14 11:42 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
With storyboard.openstack.org <http://storyboard.openstack.org> looming
on the horizon, should such an effort be put on the back burner for now?
I don't expect
nder's
API but has access to the volumes.
Unfortunately, this is not possible now and I don't think it'll be
possible until L (or even M?).
FWIW, I think the use case you've mentioned is useful and it's
something we have in our TODO list.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flape
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpn13I7KvWyK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin
/doodle.com/nwc26k8satuyvvmz
Thanks,
-Nikhil
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp2FcMW9czH6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
adoption be listed there?
I've a spec[0] for glanceclient and I'll work on the glance_store one
now.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133485/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpmPWgBJiwpY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ope
es of
cross-project issues on the agenda. Let me know on this thread if that
sounds like a good idea, and we'll make the final call at next week
meeting :)
+1 :-)
This sounds like a good idea.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp5ulVWt7car.pgp
Description: PGP
people could/would participate in a review day like this on 4 December?
I'll probably be AFK on December 4th and 5th, can it be on December
3rd ?
Either way, I'm in. I'll do my best to be there on the 4th if it can't
be changed.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
On 21/11/14 14:13 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Nov 21, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 21/11/14 12:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
We have a bit of a backlog in the Oslo review queue. Before we add a bunch of
new reviews for Kilo work, I’d like to see if we can clear some of
it quite a bit,
make it easier for contributors to join in, and seems consistent with
the direction of OpenStack as a whole.
Lets get rid of it, once and for all.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpYWQLd7puPx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenSt
week.
Thanks for your consideration and the hard work, Erno and Alex!
+2A
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpD0rOoQ2Ei4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/ma
ought I'd also provide
feedback on your email.
Thanks,
Flavio
G'luck,
Peter
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
//lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1egx0cInqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
compatible, but not sure about forcing version bump on stable
https://review.openstack.org/137862 - Disable osprofiler by default to
prevent upgrade issues, disabled by default in other services
+2 to both
[snip]
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgprfgIIZkiMY.pgp
Description: PGP
point release.
+2 on the requirements revert.
I just read this and I agree.
The same thing applies for the cap planned for glance_store, which I
had already -2'd.
Cheers,
Fla
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpXnms9xJcPt.pgp
Description: PGP
__
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpR5xEchxz6w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenSt
list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpOyzMXNqoky.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
https://github.com/openstack/python-keystoneclient/blob/41afe3c963fa01f61b67c44e572eee34b0972382/keystoneclient/auth/conf.py#L49
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/keystonemiddleware/blob/master/keystonemiddleware/auth_token.py#L356
[3] https://review.openstack.org/143063
--
@flaper87
Flav
On 19/12/14 09:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 19, 2014, at 7:17 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
DISCLAIMER: The following comments are neither finger pointing the
author of this work nor the keystone team.
RANT: We should really stop assuming everyone is using a global `CONF
community's transparency and make our
development discussions publicly accessible to contributors in all
time-zones and from other projects. It is very useful to look back on
the logs for previous discussions or as well as to refer people to
discussions or questions previously answered.
+2
Than
ist (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging
It's also important to remember that IRC channels are typically not
private and are likely already logged by dozens of people anyway.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Christopher Aedo mailto:ca...@mirantis.com&g
On 09/01/15 15:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[huge snip]
What do you think ? Could that work ? If not, do you have alternate
suggestions ?
Love it! Thanks for the thoughtful and detailed email.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp2LB9GMnSpn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
infra team, requirement's cores, etc.
What python-clients are you referring to? Are you referring to libs
that live in stackforge or dependencies for things that live in
stackforge?
Do you have an (or many) example?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgps2sjt5rSu5.pgp
Description: PGP sign
ns)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpQWSgWiNTyI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Deve
@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpv3A6hG5r81.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Li
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.o
101 - 200 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
