On 2014/30/05 02:08, James Slagle wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
As I was reviewing this patch today:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96160/
It occurred to me that the tuskar project is part of the tripleo
program:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governanc
Hi UXers,
I just wanted to remind all, that on Monday June 2, 2014 at 1700 UTC we
are starting with OpenStack UX meetings (#openstack-meeting-3).
More details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/UX
I'd like to ask all participants if you could write your time zones
here: https://etherp
details with Nova. That said, I'll try to make the TripleO sprint
as well -- assuming the dates don't overlap.
Cheers,
Devananda
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jaromir Coufal mailto:jcou...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi to all,
after previous TripleO & Ironic mid-cycle
verlap.
>
> Cheers,
> Devananda
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jaromir Coufal
wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> after previous TripleO & Ironic mid-cycle meetup, which I believe
> was beneficial for all, I would like to suggest that we meet again
> in the middl
On 2014/30/05 10:00, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 29/05/2014 20:57:10:
From: Zane Bitter
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 29/05/2014 20:59
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle
collaborative meetup
BTW one timing option I
On 2014/30/05 22:37, James Polley wrote:
On 30 May 2014, at 8:13 pm, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to propose to add Tuskar as a permanent topic to the agenda for
our weekly IRC meetings. It is an official TripleO's project, there happening
quite a lot around it and w
ime ending before or on
July the 25th - and I'm going to put that in the etherpad now :0
-Rob
On 3 June 2014 04:51, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 05/30/2014 06:58 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2014/30/05 10:00, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 29/05/2014 20:57:10:
F
te for
option2 and proceed forward with the organization for the meetup?
Thanks for all the interest
-- Jarda
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-midcycle-meetup
On 2014/28/05 13:05, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi to all,
after previous TripleO & Ironic mid-cycle meetup, which I believe
On 2014/10/06 10:25, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-06-08 16:44:58 -0700:
Hi,
it looks that there is no more activity on the survey for mid-cycle
dates so I went forward to evaluate it.
I created a table view into the etherpad [0] and results are following:
*
Hm, strange.
I have contributed in Icehouse but didn't get the e-mail fro voting. I
wanted to vote from the link which you provided but it didn't work for
me - "you already voted from given key".
Can anybody help?
Thanks
-- Jarda
On 2014/10/06 21:18, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
Hello everyo
Hello folks,
I am happy to announce, that based on previous etherpad gathering, mails
and discussions, on the weekly meeting we confirmed final dates for
TripleO mid-cycle meetup:
July 21-25 (Monday-Friday)
Red Hat office, Raleigh, North Carolina
I will be working on another arrangem
Hi all,
I would like to remind you to sign up for mid-cycle meetup which is
happening July 21-25 in Raleigh:
* https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-midcycle-meetup
We need number of participants as soon as possible so that we can ask
for group discount at the hotel. Also if we don't get roo
Hi UXers,
this is a reminder that our next regular IRC meeting is happening
tomorrow (Wednesday) June 18th at 14:30 UTC at #openstack-meeting-3.
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/UX
Feel free to add topics which you are interested in.
See you all tomorrow
-- Jarda
Hello folks,
there were few discussions about meeting during the cycle and discuss
ongoing issues, progress and next steps of bigger topics.
As long as it is pretty late announcement, I don't think (and I guess we
agreed) that it doesn't worth to organize a special event just for
Horizon. So
On 2014/05/03 23:36, Lyle, David wrote:
I'd like to nominate Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core. I find his reviews
very insightful and more importantly have come to rely on their quality. He has
contributed to several areas in Horizon and he understands the code base well.
Radomir is also
Hi OpenStackers,
User interface which is managing the OpenStack Infrastructure is
currently named Tuskar-UI because of historical reasons. Tuskar itself
is a small service, which is giving logic into generating and managing
Heat templates and helps user to model and manage his deployment. The
On 2014/27/03 19:04, Jiří Stránský wrote:
On 27.3.2014 18:21, Dougal Matthews wrote:
[snip]
As a side, but related note, I think we should rename the Tuskar client
to whatever name the Tuskar UI gets called. The client will eventually
have feature parity with the UI and thus will have the sam
On 2014/07/04 15:36, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
Hi all,
One of the topics of discussion during the TripleO midcycle meetup a few weeks
ago was the direction we'd like to take Tuskar during Juno. Based on the ideas
presented there, we've created a tentative list of items we'd like to address:
https
On 2014/08/04 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
jdon -> jdob
+1 for all the folks.
-- Jarda
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively
On 2014/03/04 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with
Hello OpenStackers,
I would like to share with you non-narrated demo of current version of
'Tuskar-UI' project, which is very close to Icehouse release (one or two
more patches to come in).
Tuskar-UI is a user interface based on TripleO approach which allows
user to register nodes (currently
On 2014/09/04 16:31, mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Jarda thanks this was great to watch - seems a lot of things have been
fixed/tweaked in last couple weeks. Is everything running from current
master branches?
marios
Yes, everything what you see is currently in the master branch (last
changes were
Dear Stackers,
I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged
branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0].
I put together a narrated demo of all included features [1].
You can find one manual part in the whole workflow - cloud
initialization. There is ongoing work on autom
On 2014/10/04 19:40, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Jarda
Congratulations
This release and the demo is super awesome!!
Do you have any instruction to install this one?
Thank you, Nachi!
look at Ladislav's response he posted our guideline for installation. If
you have any problems, let us know on #tusk
On 2014/10/04 19:40, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Jarda
Congratulations
This release and the demo is super awesome!!
Do you have any instruction to install this one?
Thank you, Nachi!
look at Ladislav's response he posted our guideline for installation. If
you have any problems, let us know on #tusk
On 2014/10/04 22:55, Robert Collins wrote:
On 10 April 2014 01:54, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hello OpenStackers,
I would like to share with you non-narrated demo of current version of
'Tuskar-UI' project, which is very close to Icehouse release (one or two
more patches to come in).
On 2014/11/04 10:27, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Dear Stackers,
I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged
branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0].
I put together a narrated demo of all included features [1].
You can find one
Hi Jarda,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Unfortunately, these instructions aren't very useful if you want to do
an installation based on packages. Something like:
git clone https://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-incubator
$TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-incubator/scripts/devtest.sh --trash-my-machine
On 2014/15/04 23:15, James Slagle wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
- it certainly addresses:
- making design work visible
- being able to tell who has had input
- and providing clear feedba
Hey Chad,
thank you very much for starting this thread.
Let me start with short introduction to my thoughts about OpenStack
Dashboard's direction and our latest work there. I am working towards a
higher goal of having the OpenStack UI a stable, simple and coherent
story for our end users. Whi
Dear OpenStack UX community and everybody else who is interested in
OpenStack's user experience,
When there is more contributors appearing in time, I would like us to
establish a formal process of how the UX work should be organized.
Therefore I am suggesting a few tools below for us to be mor
On 11/11/14 09:30, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
On 11/10/2014 12:19 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:13:48PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hi,
tl;dr: how to progreed in separating horizon and openstack_dashboard
About a year ago now we agreed, it makes sense to separate horizon and
On 12/11/14 02:45, Richard Jones wrote:
I have set up a doodle poll to let folk enter their preferred times.
It's in UTC/GMT (/London time, because doodle) so use something like
http://everytimezone.com/ to figure that out :)
https://doodle.com/47h3f35nad62ncnf
Richard
Quick Question:
On 2014/19/06 09:58, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
My quick questions are:
* Who would be interested (and able) to get to the meeting?
* What topics do we want to discuss?
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-juno-meetup
Thanks for
Thanks a lot for your help.
Just a side note - we need to fill in the number of requested rooms, so
that we don't get charged for extra cost - we have a group discount price.
So for everybody, please, go forward and book your room here:
http://tinyurl.com/redhat-marriott
-- Jarda
On 2014/24/
Hi UXers,
this is a reminder that our next regular IRC meeting is happening on
Monday, July 7th at 17:00 UTC at #openstack-meeting-3.
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/UX
Feel free to add topics which you are interested in.
See you all there
-- Jarda
__
Hey folks,
after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wireframes,
which are ready for implementation in Juno:
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/juno/2014-07-09_nodes-ui_juno.pdf
Let me know in case of any questions.
Cheers
-- Jarda
___
Hey folks,
after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wireframes,
which are ready for implementation in Juno:
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/juno/2014-07-09_tuskar-ui_juno.pdf
Let me know in case of any questions.
Cheers
-- Jarda
___
Dear all,
Red Hat is happy to host a dinner during TripleO/Heat mid-cycle which
should be held on Wednesday, July 23rd.
I would like to invite each attendee of the meetup and ask you to fill
yourselves into the relevant section at the end of the following
etherpad by the end of Wednesday (do
On 2014/10/07 22:19, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-07-09 07:51:56 +:
Hey folks,
after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wireframes,
which are ready for implementation in Juno:
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/juno/2014-07-09
Hi Devananda,
thank you for your great feedback and notes. Few reactions follow inline:
On 2014/10/07 21:29, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Awesome! Glad to see the progress since the design summit.
Some comments:
- slide 1 shows some driver-specific input fields. We have work in
progress to e
Hi Wan,
thanks for great notes. My response is inline:
On 2014/15/07 23:19, Wan-yen Hsu wrote:
The "Register Nodes" panel uses "IPMI user" and "IPMI Password".
However, not all Ironic drivers use IPMI, for instance, some Ironic
drivers will use iLO or other BMC interfaces instead of IPMI. I wo
On 2014/15/07 20:29, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-07-15 07:15:12 +:
On 2014/10/07 22:19, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-07-09 07:51:56 +:
Hey folks,
after few rounds of reviews and feedbacks, I am sending wi
Hello folks,
I apologize that I missed the previous meeting due to some urgency. I
wanted to ask Liz to handle the meeting for me but she was not around
(vacation). I hope you at least managed to chat a bit about ongoing
stuff anyway.
Next week (July 28) I am not around, but I will ask someb
Hello everybody,
I just started and etherped with various names of concepts in Tuskar. It
is important to get all of us on the same page, so the usage and
discussions around Tuskar concepts are clear and easy to use (also for
users, not just contributors!).
https://etherpad.openstack.org/tus
3/12/09 11:20, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hello everybody,
I just started and etherped with various names of concepts in Tuskar.
It is important to get all of us on the same page, so the usage and
discussions around Tuskar concepts are clear and easy to use (also for
users, not just contributors!
On 2013/16/09 15:11, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
On 09/16/2013 05:50 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi,
after few days of gathering information, it looks that no more new ideas
appear there, so let's take the last round of voting for names which you
prefer. It's important for us to get on the
Hey buddies,
1st round of voting has happened during the weekly meetings, you can see
the log here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tuskar/2013/tuskar.2013-09-17-19.00.html
There are few options which needs to revote, so I updated the etherpad
with suggested names: https://etherpad.o
Hi folks,
I am sending etherpad with first draft of Tuskar states for Nodes, Racks
and Classes. Feel free to update, add or comment anything. It is
important that we come to finite set of well defined states which we can
use across API, CLI and UI.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-state
On 2013/19/09 04:08, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi everyone,
Some of us Tuskar developers have had the chance to meet the TripleO
developers face to face and discuss the visions and goals of our
projects.
Tuskar's ultimate goal is to have to a full OpenStack management
solution: letting the clou
Hey folks,
I want to introduce our direction of Tuskar UI, currently described with
POC wireframes. Keep in mind, that wireframes which I am sending were
made for purpose of proof of concept (which was built and released in
August) and there are various changes since then, which were already
Hi Rob,
thank you very much for such valuable feedback, I really appreciate it.
Few comments follow inline the text.
On 2013/25/09 03:50, Robert Collins wrote:
A few quick notes.
Flavors need their extra attributes to be editable (e.g. architecture,
raid config etc) - particularly in the und
ed
to do and how would I find it?”
Very cool though.
-Gabriel
*From:*Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:04 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] [UI] Introducing POC Wireframes
Hey folks,
I want to i
Hey folks,
couple of minutes ago we had conversation about Tuskar states, which was
based on previous brainstorming in etherpad
(https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-states) - already updated version.
YouTube stream of discussion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6N0h-D2nr4&feature=youtu.be
re it
might be better visible, what are the parts of 'resource class'.
-- Jarda
On 2013/25/09 21:46, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
After reading your description in the other email, I might suggest the
term “hardware profile” instead of “class”. Just a thought.
-Gabriel
*From:*Ja
e the
first officially approved non-code ATCs and it looks that we were not
added to particular lists. So if you know about some lists where we
should be and could fix it...
Thanks
-- Jaromir
(Jaromir Coufal)
On 2013/27/09 19:12, Anita Kuno wrote:
Elections are underway and will remain ope
Hi everyone,
based on Tuskar's merger with TripleO and upstream feedback on Tuskar, when I
was thinking about processes and workflows there, I got into some changes which
I think that are important for us, because they will help us to achieve better
flexibility and still having ability for eas
Link for streaming: http://youtu.be/m3y6uD8yKVQ
(Hangout link will be pasted to IRC #tripleo channel. If you don't fit
into the capacity, I am sorry, please follow the youtube stream)
Cheers
-- Jarda
On 2013/30/09 13:57, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi everyone,
based on Tuskar's m
Sending wireframes from the meeting:
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tuskar/2013-09-30_tuskar_resource_class_creation_wireframes.pdf
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tuskar/2013-09-30_tuskar_l-group_creation_wireframes.pdf
Cheers
-- Jarda
On 2013/30/09 13:57, Jaromir
On 2013/30/09 09:50, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jaromir Coufal wrote:
I didn't get e-mail with link for my vote for Horizon PTL. I am non-code
contributor, officially recognized by ATC status in August 2013. Could
you please include me into Horizon voting list? I am not sure if there
are also
deployments.
Looking forward to any feedback
Thanks
-- Jarda
On 2013/30/09 13:57, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi everyone,
based on Tuskar's merger with TripleO and upstream feedback on Tuskar, when I
was thinking about processes and workflows there, I got into some changes which
I think that are impo
Hey,
based on Friday's call, I put down some notes, added few other ideas and
I am sending a draft here. Let's start on top of that, get to details,
figure out the scope and we are half finished (just implementation part,
but that's minority) :).
https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-concept
Hi Liz,
thanks a lot for your feedback, I'll add some inline notes:
On 2013/02/10 20:04, Liz Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Hi Jarda,
I just wanted to send along my feedback on the current state of the
Rack and Resource Class creation wireframes…
*Rack Creation*
1) Even though it looks like wit
Hey Ju,
thanks for your feedback, I don't think there is anything to hide and I
would love to have everything discussed in open way. I hope you don't
mind me cc-ing the answer to upstream list.
Furthermore what I need to stress is:
* Purpose of these wireframes was to start discussion around
you might want to use [TripleO]
rather than [Tuskar]. (In that everyone in TripleO should be
interested in your notes :)).
Cheers,
Rob
On 7 October 2013 20:30, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hey,
based on Friday's call, I put down some notes, added few other ideas and I
am sending a draft here.
Hi Max,
I think it looks that it was some student, who started to have a look on
that as a project, there appeared some wireframes, but then it
disappeared. So if you want to jump into it, feel free! There was
already some discussion in WB, but I believe you've read this one.
The things whic
Hi Robert,
I have few concerns regarding metrics and core-team. To sum up, I think
that there needs to be more metrics and core-reviewers for particular
project (not one group). More details follow:
Measures:
* Only number of reviews shouldn't be the only indicator - you can get
int
Hi Chris,
On 2013/08/10 13:13, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi
On 8 October 2013 11:59, Jaromir Coufal <mailto:jcou...@redhat.com>> wrote:
* Example: It doesn't make sense, that someone who is
core-reviewer based on image-builder is able to give +2 on UI or
CLI code
On 2013/08/10 23:53, Robert Collins wrote:
On 9 October 2013 07:24, Jiří Stránský wrote:
Clint and Monty,
thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I was
mostly concerned by the "line in the sand". Your responses shed some more
light on the issue for me and i hope
about UX of OpenStack, get in
touch with all OpenStack projects at once and figure out the best way
for our cooperation.
[0] https://plus.google.com/115177641540718537778/posts/iumZKYXbe4N
Sincerely yours,
Jaromir Coufal
Proposed UX Technical Lead
Red Hat
Hey Thierry,
thanks for your notes. Few comments are following inline.
On 2013/14/10 11:00, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Dear Technical Committee Members and OpenStack Community,
after previous brainstorming, suggestions and discussions in community,
we came out with OpenStack
Hey folks,
I am sending an updated version of wireframes for Resource Class
Creation. Thanks everybody for your feedback, I tried to cover most of
your concerns and I am sending updated version for your reviews. If you
have any concerns, I am happy to discuss it with you.
http://people.redha
Hi Jay,
thank you very much for your feedback. Some comments will follow inline:
On 2013/16/10 19:15, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Jarda, wireframes look really nice :)
One tiny suggestion:
"Assistant (proper halfing of resources)"
If I understand correctly, I think a better layout/UI/wording might b
Dear OpenStack UX community,
Anybody who is interested in UX work on OpenStack, I would like to
invite you to join OpenStack UX Askbot tool:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com
(you can use log through launchpad)
Together with that, I managed to deploy and setup few other tools for
us, so we
Hi everybody,
you can find updated version of workflows for Creating L2-Group and
Adding New Nodes at new discussion tool for UX:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/7/tuskar-ui-l2-groups-and-nodes/
For any feedback, please follow the conversation there
Thanks
-- Jarda
__
the latest version of
the Resource Class Creation wireframes.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Liz
On Oct 16, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Jaromir Coufal <mailto:jcou...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hey folks,
I am sending an updated version of wireframes for Resource Class
Creatio
Hi folks,
also here I have updated version of wireframes:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/7/tuskar-ui-l2-groups-and-nodes/?sort=oldest#post-id-48
Any feedback is welcome, feel free to join discussion there.
-- Jarda
On 2013/22/10 16:41, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi everybody,
you
Hey buddies,
updated version was posted here:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/5/tuskar-ui-resource-class-creation/?sort=oldest#post-id-49.
If you have any comments or concerns, feel free to follow the discussion
there.
Cheers
-- Jarda
On 2013/16/10 18:31, Jaromir Coufal wrote
Hello community,
I was wondering, since there is a lot of people who cannot attend Design
Sessions, if we can help them to be present at least in some way.
My thinking was going in the way of doing a hangout from the session.
However hangout has limited audience of 10 people, so what we can d
On 2013/01/11 13:48, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jarda,
Here are some lessons learned from a friend who is on a team that used
Google Hangout - http://drbacchus.com/google-hangout-lessons-learned
-- dims
Awesome, thanks a lot for this cheat sheet :)
I have done couple of them, having quite a go
On 2013/01/11 18:42, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 11/01/2013 05:33 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
I was wondering, since there is a lot of people who cannot attend Design
Sessions, if we can help them to be present at least in some way.
We tried in the past to setup systems to enable remote
Hey OpenStackers,
I hope you all enjoyed Hong Kong Summit and for those who couldn't
attend, I hope we will see each other next time!
For all of you, I'd like to follow up on conversation from Summit about
Search project [0], which Dmitri introduced and I believe it has great
potential for e
Hi everybody,
in UX community group on G+ popped out a need for enhancing user
experience of main navigation, because there are spreading out various
issues .
There is already created a BP for this:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/navigation-enhancement
Toshi had great idea
roject tab. Each “section” would have elements
within it that logically mapped to that section.
I think this is a great discussion and I’m very interested to hear
where others are headed with their thinking, so thank you for getting
it started!
*Jeff***
*From:*Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@
Hi folks,
UX community for OpenStack
(https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/100954512393463248122) is
looking for new place for UX related discussions. Current format of
Google+ is bringing us lot of issues, which we are trying to resolve
with new tool, where developers/designers can ask UX
, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi folks,
UX community for OpenStack
(https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/100954512393463248122) is
looking for new place for UX related discussions. Current format of
Google+ is bringing us lot of issues, which we are trying to resolve
with new tool, where developers
Hi everybody,
voting for discussion tool for OpenStack UX has ended. First of all I
want to give huge thanks to all interested and participated people. All
your votes and activities around were very helpful for us to back our
decision up.
The winner of voting is:
** Askbot (60.9 %)*
with 14
Hi All,
at the moment we are building discovery, deploy and overcloud images all
at once. Then we face user to deal with uploading all images at one step.
User should not be exposed to discovery/deploy images. This should
happen automatically for the user during undercloud installation as
po
t the same thing that you're
talking about, but it might be a step in that direction.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173645/
On 04/17/2015 09:50 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi All,
at the moment we are building discovery, deploy and overcloud images all
at once. Then we face user to deal wit
time.
Expect that it is standard glance functionality.
-Original Message-
From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:51 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images
into right pla
Not rooting for any approach here, just want to add a bit of factors which
might play a role when deciding which way to go:
A) Performance matters, we should be improving simplicity and speed of
deployments rather than making it heavier. If the deployment time and resource
consumption is not si
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
