r-2015/summit-videos/presentation/the-big-tent-a-look-at-the-new-openstack-projects-governance
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That said, this is great feedback and we may indeed need to do a
>>> better job to explain the big tent. That presentation, I believe, was
>>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Chris Buccella wrote:
> I tried (or tried to try) Cloudbreak recently, as I need to deploy a newer
> version of HDP than Sahara supports.
>
> The interface is slick, but lacks the ability to make some choices about
> your OpenStack installation. The heat template
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Peng Zhao wrote:
>Hi, all,
>
> I would like to propose nova-hyper driver:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-hyper.
>
>- What is Hyper?
>Put simply, Hyper is a hypervisor-agnostic Docker runtime. It is
>similar to Intel’s ClearCont
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch of
> slightly odd conditionals inside of grenade and devstack to make it so
> that if you were very careful, you could just not stop some of the old
> services on a single node
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Some discussion occurred over IRC about a bug which was publicly open
> related to TrustedFilter [1]
> I want to take the opportunity for raising my concerns about that specific
> filter, why I dislike it and how I think we coul
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague > <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgr
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>> On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague > > <mailto:s...@dague.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Gordon
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague >> <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote
o... :) And they were added
> to
> > fill a gap, which has already been pointed out in this thread. So if we
> > remove them without a replacement for that gap, we regress.
>
> Oops, I didn't mean to say that "Specs" as a concept should be gone.
> Sorr for poor
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 06/24/2015 08:38 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
>
> > I urge people to reply to this instead of my original email as the
> > writing is more detailed and balanced.
>
> OK, I've read what others
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 10:17 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy > <mailto:kcham...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 06/26/2015 04:08 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>> On 06/26/2015 07:43 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/26/2015 01:14 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>>
On 06/16/2015 09:51 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 06/16/2015 08:56 AM, Dmitry T
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>> On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> > On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
No
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joe Gordon
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote
+1
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 8:05 AM, David TARDIVEL wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> I’d like to promote Vincent Francoise to the core team. Vincent's done a
> great work
> on code reviewing and has proposed a lot of patchsets. He is currently the
> most active
> non-core reviewer on Watcher project, and t
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 02:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I would like to nominate Melanie Witt for the python-novaclient-core
> team.
> >
> > (What is python-novaclient-core? Its a new group which will contain
> > all of nova-core as
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> The following review for Kilo deprecates the EC2 API in Nova -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150929/
>
> There are a number of reasons for this. The EC2 API has been slowly
> rotting in the Nova tree, never was highly tested, implements a
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> So, honestly, yes.
>
> For a library to release safely it must:
>
> * have stable-compat jobs running (this was the issue with barbican client)
> * if it has a stable/juno branch it must be pinned in stable/juno (this
> was the issue on most of
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Douglas Mendizabal <
douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> 2015-01-29 19:31 GMT+01:00 Joe Gordon :
> > That means clients need overlapping dependencies with the stable
> branches.
> > I don't think this is a reasonable requirement, and am not sure what we
> gain from it
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg
wrote:
> I think the simple answer is "yes". We (keystone) should emit
> notifications. And yes other projects should listen.
>
> The only thing really in discussion should be:
>
> 1: soft delete or hard delete? Does the service mark it as orphaned
This broke grenade on stable/juno, here is the fix.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152333/
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of:
>
> TaskFlow 0.7.0: taskflow structured state management library.
>
> For more details, pleas
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-01-27 02:46:03 -0800:
> > Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> I'm open to alternative suggestions on where the list of tags, the
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Walter A. Boring IV
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>I wanted to get some feedback from the Nova folks on using Cinder's
> Brick library. As some of you
> may or may not know, Cinder has an internal module called Brick. It's used
> for discovering and removing
> volumes a
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Malawade, Abhijeet <
abhijeet.malaw...@nttdata.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have submitted patch for cinder-client [1] to 'Return tuple containing
> header and body from client' instead of just response.
>
> Also cinder spec for the same is under review [2].
>
>
>
not need to make
> changes in services which are using cinder-client.
>
> It will be backward compatible change.
>
Maintaining backwards compatibility is very important. Making return_req_id
optional sounds like a good solution going forward.
>
>
> Could you please give your su
Before releasing a new python-novaclient we should make sure novaclient is
capped on stable branches so we don't break the world yet again.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> We haven't done a release of python-novaclient in awhile (2.20.0 was
> released on 2014-9-20 before
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, "Matt Riedemann"
wrote:
>
> There are at least two blocking bugs:
>
> 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1419913
>
> Sounds like jogo is working a javelin fix for this. I'm not aware of a
patch to review though.
We need to stop trying to install tempest in the sam
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, John Griffith
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >>
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, John Griffith
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >&
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> >> >> Tracking etherpad:
> >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/wedged-stable-gate-feb-2015
>
> BTW there is a tracking etherpad updated by
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Stable_branch_champions
> https://etherpad.openstack.org
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Steven Dake (stdake)
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/9/15, 3:02 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>
> >Adrian Otto wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> We have multiple options for solving this challenge. Here are a few:
> >>
> >> 1) Cherry pick scheduler code from Nova, which already has a workin
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 01/20/2015 10:54 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>
>> From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:54 PM
>>
>> When we look at consistency, we look at everything else in OpenStack.
>>> From the standpo
+1 !!
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Morgan Fainberg
mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi everyone!
I wanted to propose Marek Denis (marekd on IRC) as a new member of the Keystone
Core team. Marek has been instrumental in the implementation of Federated
Identity. His work on Keyston
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> The previous policy is that we do a release "when requested" or when a
> critical bug fix merges. I don't see any critical fixes awaiting
> release, but I am not opposed to a release.
>
> The reason I didn&#
Hi,
As you know a few of us have been spending way too much time digging
stable/juno out of the ditch its currently in. And just when we thought we
were in the clear a new library was released without a requirements cap in
stable global-requirements and broke stable/juno grenade. Everytime this
h
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Alexandre Levine
wrote:
> Yaroslav,
>
> The bug:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1410622
>
> And the review:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152112/
>
> It's recently fixed.
>
>
Note, AFAIK this has not been backported to stable/juno or stable/icehouse
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015, at 07:12 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As you know a few of us have been spending way too much time digging
> > stable/juno out of the ditch its currently in. And just when
1.
A few months back we started the process to remove the tempest CLI
tests from tempest [0]. Now that we have successfully pulled
novaclient CLI
tests out of tempest, we have the process sorted out. We now
have a process
that should be easy to follow for each project, in
out unit
> tests or vice versa without altering discovery.
> On 14 Feb 2015 08:57, "Joe Gordon" wrote:
>
>>
>>1.
>> A few months back we started the process to remove the tempest CLI
>> tests from tempest [0]. Now that we have successfu
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 08:50 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> > On 2/16/15, 16:08, "Sean Dague" wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/16/2015 02:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 01:01 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
>
, and then having no idea why a VM deploy
failed? This is likely another thread, but thought I’d pose it here to see if
we think this might be a potential blueprint as well.
- Joe
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
>
> On 02/17/2015 04:59 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
&g
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 18, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Doug Hellmann
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 03:
rements.txt and requirements.gate works for me. If a
simple renaming makes things better, then great!
As for Doug's comment, yes we need to work something out to overwrite
requirements.gate, under your proposed naming, with global requirments
> Adam
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015
And this just broke icehouse jobs. Which means devstack-gate is broken.
http://logs.openstack.org/53/157553/1/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full-icehouse/6c63b71//logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2015-02-19_22_21_21_419
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/global-requirements.txt?h=stable/
client']))
Note: I am not pushing the patch to fix this myself, we need more
people who are able to monitor and fix these types of issues.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> And this just broke icehouse jobs. Which means devstack-gate is broken.
>
>
> http:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>1.
> A few months back we started the process to remove the tempest CLI
> tests from tempest [0]. Now that we have successfully pulled novaclient
> CLI
> tests out of tempest, we have the process
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
> Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM.
> At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the most RAM hence
> OOM selects mysqld (4.7G) to be killed.
>
> From a glusterfs backend perspect
ther in a single environment, but it
seems like more and more people are moving away from deploying with that
model anyway. Moving to this model would require a little more then just
installing everything in separate venvs. We would need to make sure we
don't cap oslo libraries etc. in order
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 02:07 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Doug Hellmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 06:06 AM,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/20/2015 07:16 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> > Sean Dague wrote:
> >> On 02/20/2015 12:26 AM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
> >>> Its more than just the naming. In the original proposal,
> >>>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> > wrote:
> >
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> >
Was:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html
There has been frustration with our current 6 month development cadence.
This is an attempt to explain those frustrations and propose a very rough
outline of a possible alternative.
Currently we follow a 6 month re
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova
> volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a
> discussion around what style the functional tests should take.
> Especially as that had a mix of CLI and AP
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
> > [...]
> > I think a lot of the frustration with our current cadence comes out of
> > the big stop everything (development, planning etc.), and stabilize the
> > release process. Which
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Erdfelt
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I
> > propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be
> > discussed at the cross-project meeting to
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > Was:
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html
> >
> > There has been frustration with our curre
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> > On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > > On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
> >
We saw the same issue elsewhere, and Doug had great explanation on how it
broke semver
https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg46533.html
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+bug/1425262
>
> mtrei
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> > On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> >
> >>> IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of
> >>> pretty tabled results as well.
> >>
> >> Um... isn't that just
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, melanie witt wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> > I'm happy if there are other theories about how we do these things,
> > being the first functional test in the python-novaclient tree that
> > creates and destroys real resources, there isn't
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Duncan Thomas
wrote:
> Hi
>
> So a review [1] was recently submitted to cinder to fix up all of the H302
> violations, and turn on the automated check for them. This is certainly a
> reasonable suggestion given the number of manual reviews that -1 for this
> issu
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
> Gary Kotton came across a doozy of a bug recently:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1419785
>
> In short, when you start a Nova compute, it will query the driver for
> instances and compare that against the expected host of the the i
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the "Eventlet
> Best Practices” spec [2] started by bnemec. The discussion of that spec
> revolved around the question of whether our cross-project specs repository
> is the right p
a specific order
Not sure what the best way to address those two points is. Perhaps the
best way forward is a openstack-specs spec to hash out these details.
> Tim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:ian.corda...@rackspace.com]
> > Sent:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 03:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Doug Hellmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > > During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the
>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 06:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Joe
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> thanks for a clear write-up of the matter and food for thought.
>>
>> I think the idea of having more smooth
hanks,
Joe
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
mment. Do we know if this is an intended feature or
would we consider this a bug? It seems like we could free this up, as you
said, to allow room for additional VMs, especially since we know it didn’t
successfully deploy anyway?
> Vish
>
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Joe Cro
Logged a bug [1] and submitted a fix [2]. Review away!
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1427944
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161069/
- Joe
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:42 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> On 03/03/2015 06:55 AM, Joe Cropper wrote:
>>> On Mar 3
First pass at trying to capture this thread into a README:
https://review.openstack.org/162334
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, melanie witt wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> The TC is in the middle of implementing a fairly significant change in
> project governance. You can find an overview from Thierry on the
> OpenStack blog [1].
>
> Part of the change is to recognize more projects as being part of the
> Ope
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 10/03/15 12:29, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>>
>> I feel that we're at a very vulnerable part of this transition. We've
>> abolished the incubation process and integrated release. We've
>> established a fairly low bar for new projects [2].
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015, at 05:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Zane Bitter
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/03/15 12:29, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > >
> > >>
>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> > The wheel has been removed from PyPI and anyone installing testtools
> > 1.7.0 now will install from source which works fine.
>
> On stable/icehouse devstack fails[*] with
> pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (unittest2 0.5.1
> (/usr/lib/python2.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:31 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Joe Gordon writes:
>
> > After watching the TC meeting, and double checking with the meeting notes
> > [0], it looks like the magnum vote was deferred to next week. But what
> > concerns me is the lack of action
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Nurit Vilosny wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I would like to ask for a CI permission to start commenting on Nova branch.
>
> Mellanox is engaged in pci pass-through features for quite some time now.
>
> We have an operating Neutron CI for ~2 years, and since the pci
> pass-
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> The last couple of days I was at the Operators Meetup acting as Nova
> rep for the meeting. All the sessions were quite nicely recorded to
> etherpads here - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-meetup
>
> There was both a specific Nova ses
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/11/2015 07:48 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > Out of sync Quotas --
> >
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-nova-feedback L63
&g
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> 2015-03-16 23:15 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague :
> > Our current top level shipped example paste.ini for Nova includes the
> > following set of endpoint definitions:
> >
> > [composite:osapi_compute]
> > use = call:nova.api.openstack.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Rafi Khardalian wrote:
> > I am concerned about how block migration functions when Cinder volumes
> are
> > attached to an instance being migrated. We noticed some unexpected
> > behavior recen
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:33:26AM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote:
> > > Interesting bug. I think I agree with you that there isn't a good
> solution
> > > currently for instances that have a mix of shared and not-shared
> storage.
> > >
>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I
> > noticed something that may be problematic.
> >
> > The way microversions are handled, there is a monotonical
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
> [...]
> > I don't want it suppressed. I want the use of API extensions and the
> > extension framework(s) to be completely dropped for all future
> > API-affecting work.
> [...]
>
> P
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:04:46PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2015-03-23 21:31:30 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:35:50PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > > > On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> We have a cross-project spec up for review discussing a change in the
> release process precipitated by the fact that we are now capping library
> versions in stable branch test configurations. We’ve talked about it a
> couple of times at th
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Nurit Vilosny wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Sorry for the late response.
>
> Here are some latest logs for the Nova CI:
>
>
> http://144.76.193.39/ci-artifacts/Check-MLNX-Nova-ML2-Sriov-driver_20150318_1650/
>
>
> http://144.76.193.39
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Chris Friesen
wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 11:10 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
>
>> On 03/24/2015 07:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/24/2015 09:11 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>>
On 2015-03-23 22:34:17 -0600 (-0600), Chris Friesen wrote:
> How would that be
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead of
writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from that
patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core to maintainer but after input from
the TC and others, they are keeping the term 'core' but are clarifying what
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> Do you feel like a core deveper/reviewer (we initially called them core
>> developers) [1]:
>>
>> In OpenStack a core developer is a developer who has su
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:24 PM, John Griffith
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead of
>> writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from tha
es.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Lenny Verkhovsky*
>
> SW Engineer, Mellanox Technologies
>
> www.mellanox.com
>
>
>
> Office:+972 74 712 9244
>
> Mobile: +972 54 554 0233
>
> Fax:+972 72 257 9400
>
>
>
> *From:* Joe Gor
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
> Le 01/04/2015 15:51, Sean Dague a écrit :
>
>> I just spent a chunk of the morning purging out some really old
>> Incomplete bugs because about 9 months ago we disabled the auto
>> expiration bit in launchpad -
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
> > I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead
> > of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from
> > that patch [1]. Neutron tried to go f
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
> >> My main objection to the model you propose is its binary nature. You
> >> bundle "core reviewing" duties with "drivers" duties into a single
> >> group.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thierry Carrez > <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote:
> >
> >> Joe Gordon wrote:
> >> > I cannot speak for all p
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Dolph Mathews
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
>
>> Jay,
>>
>>
>> Not far, IMHO. 100ms difference in startup time isn't something we should
>>> spend much time optimizing. There's bigger fish to fry.
>>
>>
>> I agree that priority
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> > Sent: 07 April 2015 19:03
> > To: Michael Still
> > Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: [openstack
801 - 900 of 1002 matches
Mail list logo
