On 4 September 2014 14:07, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
>> Hi team,
>>
>> I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
>> specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
>>
>> Some reasons why
>
>> Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something.
>
>>
>
>
>
> .. but I do not want to get into the discussion about software testing
>
> here, not the place really.
>
>
>
> However, I do think it is very harmful to respond to FFE request with
>
> such blanket statements and
Hi All,
Looking at the ironic virt driver code in nova it seems that a Conflict (409)
response from the ironic client results in the driver re-trying the request.
Given the comment below in the ironic code I would imagine that is not the
right behavior - it reads as though this is something tha
>There is bug when running nova with ironic
>https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1402658
I filed this bug – it has been a problem for us.
>The problem is at scheduler side the IronicHostManager will consume all the
>resources for that node whatever
>how much resource the instance used. But at
Hi All,
I recently experienced failures getting images from Glance while spawning
instances. This step comes after building the networks in the guild sequence.
When the Glance failure occurred the instance was cleaned up and rescheduled as
expected, but the networks were not cleaned up. On inve
Comment inline at bottom of message...
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2014 18:44
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Question about addit log in nova-compute.log
On 05/06/2014 01:37 PM, Jiang, Yunhong wrot
Hi Jay,
This sounds good to me. You left out the part of limits from the discussion –
these filters set the limits used at the resource tracker. You also left out
the force-to-host and its effect on limits. Yes, I would agree with doing this
at the resource tracker too.
And of course the exten
Hi Sylvain,
I think the idea is that anyone making changes to the db data model has to make
changes to the corresponding object and that is captured in the data model
implications of nova-specs (or it should be). Then reviewers check it is done.
Tests on the objects will necessarily exercise th
scheduler
On 06/04/2014 06:10 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> This sounds good to me. You left out the part of limits from the
> discussion - these filters set the limits used at the resource tracker.
Yes, and that is, IMO, bad design. Allocation ratios are the domain of
Hi All,
I have a question about information used to determine if a host supports an
image.
The virt drivers all provide a list of triples of the form (architecture,
hypervisor type, vm mode). Each triple is compared to the corresponding three
image properties in a request in the scheduler filt
FYI I'm currently working on changing the get_available_resources() method
to return a formal object, instead of its horrible undocumented dict().
With this, the current list of lists / JSON used for supported_instances
will turn into a formal object with strict validation.
Regards,
Thanks Daniel
Hi All,
The following question relates to this change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125091/
This change adds a field to the ComputeNode object called
"supported_instances". It also adds an object called "SupportedInstance" that
has fields called "arch", "hvtype" and "vm_mode".
All these n
will map to the
supported_instances field in the compute_nodes table.
Thanks for helping,
Paul
From: Paul Murray [mailto:ptma...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 October 2014 13:00
To: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
Subject: Fwd: [openstack-dev] [Nova] object field naming question
-- Forwarded message
I spent a little time trying to work out a good way to include this kind of
data in the ComputeNode object. You will have seen that I added the
supported_instances reported to the RT by the virt drivers as a list of HVSpec
– where HVSpec is a new nova object I created for the purpose.
>> The ra
The resource tracker objects BP was grouped under the scheduler work items as
well:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/kilo/approved/make-resource-tracker-use-objects.html
-
1) Summit recap
2) Status of
Hi All,
I'm sorry I am so late to this lively discussion - it looks a good one! Jay has
been driving the debate a bit so most of this is in response to his comments.
But please, anyone should chip in.
On extensible resource tracking
Jay, I am surprised to hear you say no one has explained to y
Hi Rahul,
> As I understand a weigher for the filter scheduler that weighs filtered host
> machines based on the host weight option, 'cpu.percent' can be
> configured to prioritize the hosts based on CPU percentage, but there are
> only limited options when it comes to filtering of machines in t
Hi all,
Live migration was confirmed as a Nova priority for the Mitaka cycle and a
sub-team section can be found on the priorities tracking page [1].
Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC meeting for tracking
work and raising blocking issues. Looking at the contributors here
> From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
> On 10/27/2015 01:16 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > On 10/26/2015 06:02 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> >> I believe strongly that we should deprecate the existing migrate,
> >> resize, an live-migrate APIs in favor of a single consolidated,
> >> consistent
> > Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC meeting for
> > tracking work and raising blocking issues. Looking at the contributors
> > here [2], most of the participants seem to be in the European
> > continent (in time zones ranging from UTC to UTC+3) with a few in the
> > US (pl
> From: Ed Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com]
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry that I cannot understand why resize and migrate are the same
> thing behind.
>
> Resize is essentially a migration to the same host, rather than a different
> host. The process is still taki
Normally operations on instances are synchronized at the compute node. In some
cases it is necessary to synchronize somehow at the API. I have one of those
cases and wondered what is a good way to go about it.
As part of this spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221732/
I want to attach/detac
-dev] [Nova] live migration sub-team meeting
So, its been a week. What time are we picking?
Michael
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
mailto:pmur...@hpe.com>> wrote:
> > Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC meeting for
> > trackin
that
the appropriate specs and code reviews are listed on the tracking pages. Please
also take time to review specs and code.
Please contact me or respond to this email thread if there is anything you want
to see on the agenda for the first meeting.
Regards,
Paul
From: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud
> Unfortunately, you're trying to work around misuse of the cloud API's, not
> missing features from them. Don't use those volume types, and don't build
> systems that rely on single ports and interfaces. IMO rebuild is a misguided
> concept (something that took me a long time to realize).
Slight
A quick reminder: the first live migration subteam IRC meeting is today at 1400
UTC on #openstack-meeting-3.
See: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Regards,
Paul
Paul Murray
Nova Technical Lead, HPE Cloud
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
+44 117 316 2527
___
tong@intel.com;
> shaohe.f...@intel.com; Murray, Paul (HP Cloud); liyong.q...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [nova] [RFC] how to enable xbzrle compress for live migration
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:49:50PM +, Paul Carlton wrote:
> > Seems to me the prevailing view is that we sho
The Nova Mitaka mid cycle meetup is in Bristol, UK at the Hewlett Packard
Enterprise office.
The mid cycle wiki page is here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/NovaMitakaSprint
Note that there is a web site for signing up for the event and booking hotel
rooms at a reduced event rate here:
details
Hey,
I filled in the first part of that page, but when it got to hotels I got
confused. The web site doesn't seem to mention the night rate for the HP price.
Do you know what that is?
Thanks,
Michael
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
mailto:pmur...@hpe.com>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: 17 May 2016 15:48
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Thoughts on deprecating the legacy bdm v1
> API support
>
> In the live migrati
I am implementing the following spec and have encountered a problem related
to the form of the console proxy URL provided to uses.
https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/newton/approved/convert-consoles-to-objects.html
The spec changes the representation of the console auth toke
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Please add items if you want to guarantee time to talk about them.
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack
Sorry for late update - this weekend was a holiday in UK
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lis
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:and...@lascii.com]
> Sent: 31 May 2016 22:34
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] State machines in Nova
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 04:26 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> > Timofei Durakov wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com]
> Sent: 01 June 2016 13:54
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] State machines in Nova
>
> On 06/01/2016 03:50 PM, Andrew Laski wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, at 05:5
The agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
With the non-priority spec freeze having passed there is not much on the agenda
at the moment. If you have anything to add please feel free.
Regards,
Paul
__
Hi Chris, you are right – and I think there are several synchronization issues
in the code there.
The migration process should be synchronized as it is in build_run_instance
etc. At the moment if pre_live_migrate fails due to an RPC timeout (i.e. it
takes too long for some reason) the rollback
Agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
We will go over the non-priority feature status today
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-req
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Baldwin [mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net]
> Sent: 29 June 2016 22:20
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Live-Migration] Cross l2 agent
> migration and solving Nova-Neutron live mi
Hi All,
At the moment I am not aware of a nova api call that provides information about
the pci devices on a host. The most obvious place to put this would be in
hypervisor-show. I wonder if anyone has made an attempt at this already or if
there are any reasons for not adding pci information th
Hi All,
I think we can skip the live migration meeting this week unless anyone has
something specific to discuss. Next week is the mid cycle, so I suggest the
next meeting should be Tuesday 26th July.
Please let me know if you agree or disagree. Unless I hear otherwise I will
assume its ok to
The live migration meeting is today at usual time, but beware: a lot of time
zones have switch to summer time this week.
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
P.S. Sorry for late update - it was a national holiday in UK yesterday
___
The live migration meeting is at the usual time on Tuesday, please feel free to
add items to the agenda.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Regards,
Paul
Paul Murray
Technical Lead, HPE Cloud
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
+44 117 316 2527
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 April 2016 18:47
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] New resource tracker
>
> On 04/04/2016 01:21 PM, Rayson Ho wrote:
> > I found that even in the latest git tree, the
Absolutely, yes
+1
Paul
From: ZhiQiang Fan [mailto:aji.zq...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 April 2016 12:34
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [devstack] Adding example "local.conf" files
for testing?
+1
more example and documentation are
The following summarizes status of the main topics relating to live migration
after the Newton design summit. Please feel free to correct any inaccuracies or
add additional information.
Paul
-
Libvirt storage pools
The storage pools
Thanks Matt, I meant to cover CI but clearly omitted it.
> On 30 Apr 2016, at 02:35, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>> On 4/29/2016 5:32 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
>> The following summarizes status of the main topics relating to live
>> migration after the Newton de
First live migration meeting to kick off after the summit will be today, see:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openst
The instance path is assumed to be the same everywhere. When using libvirt to
do cold migration/resize the source host creates the instance directory on the
target host using ssh and then copies the files to it using scp. So the target
host doesn’t even get to determine where its own files are c
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com]
> Sent: 05 May 2016 04:32
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][osc] Use of openstack client for admin
> commands
>
> On May 4, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Jay Pi
Hi All,
The first live migration meeting of the year will be tomorrow - see the meeting
page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Agenda on the page, feel free to add.
Happy New Year,
Paul
Paul Murray
Technical Lead, HPE Cloud
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
+44 117 316 2527
Hi All,
Following up on a question raised in the live migration meeting yesterday about
organizing topics for the mid cycle: please add topic suggestions to
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-midcycle and we will review them
in next week's meeting.
Paul
Paul Murray
Technical Lead, H
I have created a list of attendees for the Nova midcycle here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/NovaMitakaSprintAttendees
Obviously I can't put anyone's name on it for privacy reasons. If are attending
and you would like to let others know when you will be around you might like to
add yo
This is just a short reminder that there will be no live migration meeting this
week due to the mid cycle.
Agenda and other information always available at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
Paul Murray
Technical Lead, HPE Cloud
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
+44 117
See updated event detail information for the mid-cycle at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/NovaMitakaSprint
Paul
Paul Murray
Technical Lead, HPE Cloud
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
+44 117 316 2527
__
OpenStack Develo
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 03 February 2016 10:49
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Cc: Feng, Shaohe
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Migration progress
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:44:36A
Hi All,
Forgot to hit "save" on agenda yesterday - the agenda is up. Speak to you later.
Paul
Paul Murray
Technical Lead, HPE Cloud
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
+44 117 316 2527
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
Hi jay,
There are a few Nova people in HP who intend to work on this area (perhaps you
have heard that from Scott or Duncan). In fact I brought up that this would be
coming up in Vancouver and that we intend to support it. Unfortunately none of
us are available that week. I would like to be kep
m: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
Sent: 28 July 2015 12:52
To: 'jsbry...@electronicjungle.net'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
for usage questions)
Cc: Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Would anyone from Nova Core be able
to join the Cind
Hi All,
I'm wondering what the "no_device" flag is used for in the block device
mappings. I had a dig around in the code but couldn't figure out why it is
there. The name suggests an obvious meaning, but I've learnt not to guess too
much from names.
Any pointers welcome.
Thanks
Paul
Paul Mur
Hi All,
There are various efforts going on around live migration at the moment: fixing
up CI, bug fixes, additions to cover more corner cases, proposals for new
operations
Generally live migration could do with a little TLC (see: [1]), so I am going
to suggest we give some of that care in
> Please respond to this post if you have an interest in this and what you
> would like to see done.
> Include anything you are already getting on with so we get a clear picture.
Thank you to those who replied to this thread. I have used the contents to
start an etherpad page here:
https://e
The objective for the live migration priority is to improve the stability of
migrations based on operator experience. The high level approach is to do the
following:
1. Improve CI
2. Improve documentation
3. Improve manageability of migrations
4. Fix bugs
In this cycl
This time with a tag in case anyone is filtering...
From: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
Sent: 12 February 2016 16:16
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] Update on live migration priority
The objective for the live migration priority is to improve the stability of
migrations
> -Original Message-
> From: D'Angelo, Scott
>
> Matt, changing Nova to store the connector info at volume attach time does
> help. Where the gap will remain is after Nova evacuation or live migration,
This will happen with shelve as well I think. Volumes are not detached in shelve
IIRC.
Hi All,
Now that we have passed the feature freeze I thought it was worth giving a
quick update
on where we are with the live migration priority.
The following is a list of work items that have been merged in this cycle ( for
the live migration
sub-team's working page see
https://etherpad.open
> >
> >
> > On 3/4/2016 10:34 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
- snip 8<--
> >
> > The gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-full job which runs live migration
> > tests on nova patches has been non-voting for a
Thanks for a job well done John and for being so available to help us all.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
> Sent: 11 March 2016 19:22
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List d...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova P
Hi All,
I know Yunhong Jiang and Daniel Berrange have been involved in the following,
but I thought it worth sending to the list for visibility.
While writing code to convert the resource tracker to use the ComputeNode
object realized that the api samples used in the functional tests are not th
Hi Sylvain,
The list of filters does not only determine what conditions are checked, it
also specifies the order in which they are checked.
If I read the code right this change creates the worst case efficiency for this
filter. Normally you would filter first on something that removes as many n
Just to confirm, next meeting will be after the mid cycle, I will update the
agenda nearer the time:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
From: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
Sent: 11 July 2016 13:32
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova
The next live migration meeting is on 26th July.
For agenda see: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
(still being updated)
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscri
See agenda and add if you have something to bring up:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
There will be a live migration sub team meeting today, see:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@l
There will be a meeting today – just amended the agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.
There will be a live migration meeting today – agenda and time here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration
Paul
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re
On 27/09/2016, 18:12, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:40:34AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> On 09/27/2016 10:17 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
>>
>> > I think we should be able to create a domain, but once created we should
>> > never
>> > redefine a domain. We can do ad
k-dev] [nova][libvirt] Lets make libvirt's domain XML
canonical
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
mailto:pmur...@hpe.com>> wrote:
On 27/09/2016, 18:12, "Daniel P. Berrange"
mailto:berra...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:40:34AM
Hi All,
I have had the pleasure of chairing the live migration sub-team for the last
year. Recently, as some of you will have noticed, my time has been stretched to
the extent that I have started to neglect the task. Timofei Durakov has stood
in for me on several occasions recently and has now
Hi Abbass,
I am in the process of coding some of this now - take a look at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/extensible-resource-tracking - now
has a specification document attached
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaExtensibleSchedulerMetrics - the
design summit session
Hi Abbass,
I guess you read the blueprint Russell referred to. I think you actually are
saying the same - but please read steps below and tell me if they don't cover
what you want.
This is what it will do:
1. Add a column to the compute_nodes table for a JSON blob
2. Add plug-in f
more work to allow the changes and to track
them there too.
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Smith [mailto:d...@danplanet.com]
Sent: 10 January 2014 14:42
To: Wang, Shane; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services); Lee, Alexis
looking for changes.
Do you see these belonging here or would you expect those to go in a sub-class
if they were wanted?
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Smith [mailto:d...@danplanet.com]
Sent: 10 January 2014 16:22
To: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services); Wang, Shane; OpenStack Devel
n short, I am happy with your dirty children :)
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Smith [mailto:d...@danplanet.com]
Sent: 13 January 2014 15:26
To: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services); Wang, Shane; OpenStack Development
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Lee, Alexis; Tan, Lin
S
To be clear - the changes that Yunhong describes below are not part of the
extensible-resource-tracking blueprint. Extensible-resource-tracking has the
more modest aim to provide plugins to track additional resource data.
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Jiang, Yunhong [mailto:yun
Hi Justin,
It's nice to see someone bringing this kind of thing up. Seeding discovery is a
handy primitive to have.
Multicast is not generally used over the internet, so the comment about
removing multicast is not really justified, and any of the approaches that work
there could be used. Alter
From: Justin Santa Barbara [mailto:jus...@fathomdb.com]
Sent: 24 January 2014 21:01
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: discovery of peer instances
through metadata service
Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
Multic
Hi,
I have heard a couple of conflicting comments about the scheduler and nova
objects that I would like to clear up. In one scheduler/gantt meeting, Gary
Kotton offered to convert the scheduler to use Nova objects. In another I heard
that with the creation of Gantt, the scheduler would avoid u
I was looking through Nova Objects with a view to creating an extensible object
that can be used by writers of plugins to include data generated by the plugin
(others have also done the same e.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65826/ )
On the way I noticed what I think is a bug in Nova Object
, but I think I
can get on with it.
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Smith [mailto:d...@danplanet.com]
Sent: 03 February 2014 20:59
To: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [Nova] do nova objects work for plugins
Hi Sahid,
This is being done by Oshrit Feder, so I'll let her answer, but I know that it
is going to be implemented as an extensible resource (see:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/extensible-resource-tracking) so it
is waiting for that to be done. That blueprint is making good progr
Hi All,
One of my patches has a query asking if I am using the agreed way to load
plugins: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/71557/
I followed the same approach as filters/weights/metrics using nova.loadables.
Was there an agreement to do it a different way? And if so, what is the agreed
way of
t: 04 March 2014 17:50
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Murray, Paul
(HP Cloud Services)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Nova] What is the currently accepted way to do
plugins
This brings up something that's been gnawing at me for a while now ... why use
entry-p
The principle is excellent, I think there are two points/objectives worth
keeping in mind:
1. We need an effective way to make and record the design decisions
2. We should make the whole development process easier
In my mind the point of the design review part is to agree up front something
tha
a for blueprints). But now I am referring
to another thread
[http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/029232.html ]
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Walsh [mailto:sandy.wa...@rackspace.com]
Sent: 04 March 2014 21:25
To: Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Service
Hi Sylvain,
I would go with keeping AZs exclusive. It is a well-established concept even if
it is up to providers to implement what it actually means in terms of
isolation. Some good use cases have been presented on this topic recently, but
for me they suggest we should develop a better concept
I was leading that session and put the comment there - sorry it has lead to
confusion - I'll add something to make it clear.
I'm actually drafting the bp at the moment - probably going to split some of
the tasks up into different bps (at the suggestion of Dan and Russell).
Is there a particular
Hi All,
I would like to chip in with something from the side here (sorry to stretch the
discussion out).
I was looking for a mechanism to do something like this in the context of this
blueprint on network aware scheduling:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/network-bandwidth-entitleme
m to make sense to me.
BTW, I'm getting all the other emails - just not this thread!
Bemused...
Paul
On 07/18/2013 10:44 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to chip in with something from the side here (sorry to stretch
> the discussion out).
&
Hi Sean,
Do you think the existing static allocators should be migrated to going through
ceilometer - or do you see that as different? Ignoring backward compatibility.
The reason I ask is I want to extend the static allocators to include a couple
more. These plugins are the way I would have don
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo