Some docs got merged last night. I think that if you fetch the latest and
rebase that you’ll end up with conflicts that you need to resolve manually.
The Readme file has changed a lot, so I’m sure git doesn’t know how to merge
your changes in.
Tim
On Aug 18, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Rajdeep Dua
Hi Madhu,
For the alpha release (due soon), we’re focusing on just monitoring policy
violations—we’ve disabled all the enforcement code in master. (Though we never
actually hooked up the enforcement policy to the real world, so all Congress
has ever done is compute what actions to take to
Hi Jay,
We have a tutorial in review right now. It should be merged in a couple of
days. Thanks for the suggestion!
Tim
On Aug 21, 2014, at 7:54 AM, Jay Lau
jay.lau@gmail.commailto:jay.lau@gmail.com wrote:
I know that Congress is still under development, but it is better that it
Hi Madhu,
We have an end-user tutorial in review right now. That should help you get
started understanding the end-to-end flow a bit better. Look for it to be
merged today or tomorrow.
Tim
On Aug 21, 2014, at 2:44 AM, Madhu Mohan
mmo...@mvista.commailto:mmo...@mvista.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi all,
We're aiming for an alpha release of Congress tomorrow (Friday). If you have a
spare server and a little time, it’d be great if you could try it out: install
it, write some policies, run tests, etc. If you could send some feedback along
the following lines, that would be helpful.
1.
?
Thanks.
2014-08-21 23:56 GMT+08:00 Tim Hinrichs
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com:
Hi Jay,
We have a tutorial in review right now. It should be merged in a couple of
days. Thanks for the suggestion!
Tim
On Aug 21, 2014, at 7:54 AM, Jay Lau
jay.lau
Contributors (IRC, Reviews, Code):
Sergio Cazzolato (sjcazzol)
Peter Balland (pballand)
Mohammad Banikazemi (banix)
Rajdeep Dua (rajdeep)
Conner Ferguson (Radu)
Tim Hinrichs (thinrichs)
Gokul Kandiraju (gokul)
Harrison Kelly (harrisonkelly)
Prabhakar Kudva (kudva)
Susanta Nanda (skn)
Sean Roberts (sarob
:
Congrats!
Will appear in J or K?
And will there's an interface in horizon?
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Tim Hinrichs
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi all,
The alpha release of Congress is now available! We'd love any and all feedback.
Components and Features
+1
Tim
On Sep 12, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Sean Roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
~sean
On Sep 12, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Peter Balland pball...@vmware.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to nominate Aaron Rosen for the congress-core team.
Aaron has been involved in congress for the
Inline.
- Original Message -
| From: Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Sent:
- Original Message -
| From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 2:11:37 PM
| Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules
Over the holidays I realized there's something about the proposed Neutron
policy API that I don't understand. Is the proposed API complementary to the
core API, or is it intended to be an alternative? By complementary, I mean
that a user can create a bunch of networks, subnets, and ports and
Hi all,
Today on the Neutron-policy IRC, we ran into some issues that we wanted all
your feedback on (and as I was writing this note several more occurred to me).
It's the problem of conflict resolution: different policies making different
decisions about what to do. We have a conflict
priority has a similar
effect. Hmmm... leaving the priorities the same seems problematic, but
changing the priorities seems problematic too; not sure what to do here.
Tim
|
| my 2 cents,
| Manuel
|
| From: Tim Hinrichs [thinri...@vmware.com]
| Sent
Hi all,
Last week we moved the Congress IRC meeting time to every other Tuesday at
17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 (that's an hour earlier than it was
previously). But we neglected to mail out the new time, and it doesn't look
like anyone remembered the time change. So I'll hang around at
Hi all,
I wanted to send out a quick status update on Congress and start a discussion
about short-term goals.
1) Logistics
IRC Meeting time
Tuesday 1700 UTC in openstack-meeting-3
Every other week starting Feb 25
(Note this is a new meeting time/location.)
2) We have two design docs, which we
Hi Jay,
The Congress project aims to handle something similar to your use cases. I
just sent a note to the ML with a Congress status update with the tag
[Congress]. It includes links to our design docs. Let me know if you have
trouble finding it or want to follow up.
Tim
- Original
-measures that can be done
| for decreasing load and preserving QoS of nodes.
|
|
| That said, maybe I'm wrong ?
|
|
| [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/solver-scheduler
|
|
|
| 2014-02-26 1:09 GMT+01:00 Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com :
|
|
|
|
| Hi Jay,
|
| The Congress
.
|
|
|
|
| [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler
|
|
|
| Thanks,
|
|
| Jay
|
|
|
| 2014-02-27 1:48 GMT+08:00 Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com :
|
|
| Hi Jay and Sylvain,
|
| The solver-scheduler sounds like a good fit to me as well. It clearly
| provisions resources
Hi Yathiraj and Tim,
Really appreciate your comments here ;-)
I will prepare some detailed slides or documents before summit and we can have
a review then. It would be great if OpenStack can provide DRS features.
Thanks,
Jay
2014-03-01 6:00 GMT+08:00 Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
Hi all,
We started a discussion on IRC yesterday that I'd like to continue. The main
question is what kind of policy does a Congress user actually write? I can see
three options. The first two focus on actions (API calls that make changes to
the state of the cloud) and the last focuses on
Hi Prabhakar,
Thanks for the feedback. I'd be interested to hear what other policy types you
have in mind.
To answer your questions...
We're planning on extending our policy language in such a way that you can use
Python functions as conditions (atom in the grammar) in rules. That's on my
Hi Rajdeep,
This is an great problem to work on because it confronts one of the assumptions
we're making in Congress: that cloud services can be represented as a
collection of tables in a reasonable way. You're asking good questions here.
More responses inline.
Tim
- Original
Hi Prabhakar,
I'm not sure the functionality is split between 'policy' and 'server' as
cleanly as you describe.
The 'policy' directory contains the Policy Engine. At its core, the policy
engine has a generic Datalog implementation that could feasibly be used by
other OS components. (I don't
Hi Prabhakar,
One big piece we're missing in terms of code right now is the Data Integration
component. The job of this component is to integrate data sources available in
the cloud so that tables like nova:virtual_machine, neutron:owner, etc. reflect
the information stored in Nova, Neutron,
Hi Prabhakar,
No IRC meeting this week. Our IRC is every *other* week, and we had it last
week.
Though there's been enough activity of late that maybe we should consider
making it weekly.
I'll address the rest later.
Tim
- Original Message -
| From: prabhakar Kudva
Hi Prabhakar,
Found time for a more detailed response. Comments are inline.
Tim
- Original Message -
| From: Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 9:31:34
response. Comments are inline.
|
| Tim
|
| - Original Message -
| | From: Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
| | To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
| | openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| | Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 9:31:34 AM
| | Subject: Re
/1f2xokl9Tc47aV67KEua0PBRz4jsdSDLXth7dYe-jz6Q/edit#
Tim
- Original Message -
| From: Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:05:23 AM
| Subject: [Congress
: Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Policy types
|
| Hi Prabhakar,
|
| Found time for a more detailed response. Comments are inline.
|
| Tim
|
| - Original Message -
| | From: Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com
| | To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
Hi OpenStackers,
We've been working on an open policy framework for OpenStack that we're calling
Congress. We've been talking with OpenStack users and several of our partners
to understand the kinds of rules and regulations they envision enforcing with a
policy-based management framework.
Are there plans for a concrete policy language (e.g. a grammar and semantics)
to be part of the proposal, or does each plugin to Neutron supply its own
policy language?
I'm trying to envision how Heat would utilize the policy API. If there's a
concrete policy language, then Heat can take an
AM, Tim Hinrichs
| thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
| We're just getting started with Congress and understanding how it
| will integrate with the OS ecosystem, but here's our current
| thinking about how Congress relates to Oslo's policy engine and
| to Keystone. Comments and suggestions are welcome
Inline.
- Original Message -
| From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com
| To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:46:02 PM
| Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Congress: an open policy framework
|
| On 11/14/2013 11:39 AM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
| I completely agree
At the Neutron group-based policy proposal meeting today, we discussed whether
or not the proposal should include a concrete policy language. We decided to
send a note to the list to get additional feedback.
The proposed API extension includes the ability to insert/delete policy
statements.
Hi all,
We’ve been working on developing a list of use cases for Congress, which we’ve
also started voting on so as to prioritize our efforts. Please feel free take
a look, leave feedback, add to the list, vote, whatever.
Hi all,
As I mentioned in a previous IRC, when writing our first few policies I had
trouble using the tables we currently use to represent external data sources
like Nova/Neutron.
The main problem is that wide tables (those with many columns) are hard to use.
(a) it is hard to remember
Hi Madhu,
Sounds like you’re doing some good stuff! We’d love to have you involved.
Here’s the status of the items you mentioned.
- We’re about to merge a keystone/devstack integration.
- We have an HTTP API merged.
- arosen was working on a python-client; not sure how far along that is.
-
Hi all,
I see that many of the use cases require information from different OS
components, e.g. networking, compute, and storage. One thing to think about is
where those constraints are written/stored and how the data the constraints
depend on is pulled together. The Congress project might
First, some truth in advertising: I work on Congress (policy as a service), so
I’ve mostly given thought to this problem in that context.
1) I agree with the discussion below about creating a token that encodes all
the permitted actions for the user. The cons seem substantial.
(i) The token
That was really helpful background. Thanks!
I’d be happy to look into using Congress to implement what we’ve discussed:
caching policy.json files, updating them periodically, and answering queries
about the roles required to be granted access to a certain kind of action. I
think we have the
Works for me.
Tim
P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.
On Oct 22, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Sean Roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote:
We are scheduled for Monday, 03 Nov, 14:30 - 16:00. I have a conflict with
the “Meet the Influencers” talk that runs from 14:30-18:30, plus the GBP
Based on the thread entitled [all][policy][keystone] Better Policy Model and
Representing Capabilites from October 20, I wrote some code to pull a
policy.json file into Congress and figure out what roles are necessary to give
access to a specific API call.
So if bundling this kind of
Hi all,
Recently there’s been quite a bit of interest in adding reactive enforcement to
Congress: the ability to write policies that tell Congress to execute actions
to correct policy violations. We’re planning to add this feature in the next
release. I wrote a few specs that split this work
Thanks for the summary Greg—that was great! Here’s my take.
It would be great if all the services Congress interacts with implemented the
same protocol and used the same policy/data language. It is worth our time to
figure out what that protocol and language should be.
But we should not
on these lines.
Maybe take a look at how I tried to breakdown the problem into separate
questions in bullet (1) below and see if that makes sense.
Tim
Prabhakar
From:Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com
To:ruby.krishnasw
=gSzCqpS6tRMB8r5xNbeWoNcpobYiFYvOFpo3QBmvm0Ms=mdMcHh7nMTJv8PmY0i8NpQXP9_gpUpI3gxEec6zyt7Ae=
Tim
Regards
Ruby
De : Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Envoyé : mardi 16 décembre 2014 19:25
À : Prabhakar Kudva
Cc : KRISHNASWAMY Ruby IMT/OLPS; Ramki Krishnan
(r...@brocade.commailto:r...@brocade.com); Gokul B
efforts wrt to
trying out a Congress integration for Nova placements.
Thanks,
Yathi.
On 12/16/14, 10:24 AM, Tim Hinrichs
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
[Adding openstack-dev to this thread. For those of you just joining… We
started kicking around ideas for how we might
Here's a description. We need to get this added to the docs.
Below is a full description of how you might utilize the Action-centric version
of simulate. The idea is that if you describe the effects that an
action/API-call will have on the basic tables of nova/neutron/etc. (below
called an
Hi all,
A (growing) group of folks are interested in working on the problem of
delegating policy from Congress to domain-specific policy engines. We started
looking at an NFV use case: migrating VMs to reduce energy consumption. In
particular we’re looking into building a VM-placement policy
Hi Zhipeng,
We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun!
I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF
collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s
the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of
us in
~ Dutta dedu...@cisco.commailto:dedu...@cisco.com
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 4:48 PM
To: Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com
Cc: Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) yud...@cisco.commailto:yud...@cisco.com,
Gokul B Kandiraju go...@us.ibm.commailto:go...@us.ibm.com, Prabhakar
for that.
TBD
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT
From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang
Subject: Re: [openstack
implementation (of
a policy) read it in directly?
Ruby
De : Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 12 février 2015 19:03
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation] Google doc for working notes
Hi Debo and Yathiraj
.
The Congress side would take care of translating Datalog to that LP problem.
Right?
Tim
Thanks,
Yathi.
On 2/12/15, 10:02 AM, Tim Hinrichs
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi Debo and Yathiraj,
I took a third look at the solver-scheduler docs and code with your comments
ahead of F2F LFC
summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and
then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific
questions.
Would this be ok for everyone ?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri
?
On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi Zhipeng,
Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue. If you come up with some times the Copper
team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team. We’re
usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me
be set and delegated by Congress to solver scheduler via the
set_policy API. or the Solver Scheduler can query Congress via a get_policy
API to get this policy, and incorporate it as part of the solver scheduler
workflow ?
Does this sound doable ?
Thanks,
Yathi.
On 3/16/15, 11:05 AM, Tim
.
Then the solver-scheduler could pick up the constraint?
This then will not require the “solver scheduler” to implement specific
constraint classes such as “MemoryCapacityConstraint”.
We may have rules (not in sense of Datalog ☺ ) for name (e.g. variables or
constants) generation?
Ruby
De : Tim Hinrichs
Hi all,
The feedback on the POC delegation proposal has been mostly positive. Several
people have asked for a meeting to discuss further. Given time zone
constraints, it will likely be 8a or 9a Pacific. Let me know in the next 2
days if you want to participate, and we will try to find a day
Hi Adam,
For the most part we've been looking at Congress policy as complementary to
Oslo policy, so we haven’t yet tried to incorporate Oslo policy into Congress
(though I did some experiments with that a while back). But looking forward,
it would definitely be convenient if there were some
Hi Bryan,
I wish we could claim Congress has most of the data from OpenStack APIs already
available for policy, but that’s not the case today.
If it were me, I’d start with your use cases, figure out which services and API
calls you’ll need to support those use cases, and then check if those
': 'volume_type', 'description': 'None'} |
| ||
+---++
BR
Zhou Zhenzan
From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:07 AM
for is:
openstack congress datasource list
Please let us know if you are running into any issue.
Thanks
Pierre
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:39 PM Tim Hinrichs
thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi Zhenzan,
I don't have the CLI in front of me, but check out the 'driver' commands
Hi Hong,
Aaron started working on this, but we don’t have anything in place yet, as far
as I know. He’s a starting point.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157166/
Tim
On Feb 26, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Wong, Hong
hong.w...@hp.commailto:hong.w...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Aaron,
I am new to congress and
an
entire table to an arbitrary slice of a table (expressed via Datalog). That
functionality will be necessary for dealing with large datasources like
Ceilometer. But we don’t have the design fleshed out or the people to build it.
Tim
Thanks,
Ramki
From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri
substantially.
Tim
Ruby
De : Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) [mailto:yud...@cisco.com]
Envoyé : mardi 24 février 2015 20:01
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Tim Hinrichs
Cc : Debo Dutta (dedutta)
Objet : Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation] Initial workflow design
Hi Bryan,
Inline.
On Mar 24, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Bryan Sullivan
bls...@hotmail.commailto:bls...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about where to find the complete set of currently
supported data drivers (with table/row details) for Congress. The info at
Hi all,
I'm nominating Alex Yip for core status in Congress. He's active on IRC and
gerrit, fixes important bugs routinely, and developed a number of key features
for the project:
- added a DSL that makes writing datasource-drivers much easier
- improved scale-up performance by orders of
Hi all,
Inline.
From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.commailto:ayo...@redhat.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 8:34 PM
To:
Hi David,
See below.
On 5/7/15, 1:01 AM, David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk wrote:
Hi Tim
On 06/05/2015 21:53, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
I wondered if we could properly protect the API call for adding a new
Role using the current mechanism. So I came up with a simple example.
Suppose we
For those of you interested in the Congress events at the summit, here's a
list. That list is also available at:
https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/?s=congress
1. Talks
(On delegation)
Helping Telcos go Green and save OpEx via Policy
Wed, May 20 2:40-3:20, Room 110
Hi all,
I'm writing to announce my candidacy for PTL of Congress for the Liberty cycle.
We've made a lot of progress in Kilo, and I'm excited by what we'll achieve in
Liberty! To give us some perspective, I compiled a (partial) list of
improvements we made in Kilo:
* Officially became part
Hi all,
I've been making steady progress on the pieces of the delegation PoC that I
volunteered for. Here's the usual design doc for reference.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ksDilJYXV-5AXWON8PLMedDKr9NpS8VbT0jIy_MIEtI/edit#
My main tasks were to spearhead the creation of a skeleton for
, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-03 13:34:11 -0400:
On 06/03/2015 12:10 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
I definitely buy the idea of layering policies on top of each other.
But I'd worry about the long-term feasibility
I definitely buy the idea of layering policies on top of each other. But
I'd worry about the long-term feasibility of putting default policies into
code mainly because it ensures we'll never be able to provide any tools
that help users (or other services like Horizon) know what the effective
the Telco talk. Are slides for those talks available online?
On May 12, 2015, at 1:34 PM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
(On delegation)
Helping Telcos go Green and save OpEx via Policy
Wed, May 20 2:40-3:20, Room 110
https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event
Inline.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/04/2015 08:52 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 06/04/2015 06:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/03/2015 08:40 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
As long as there's some way to get the *declarative* policy from the
system (as a data
team.
Hotels might be a bit of an issue, as we are getting close, and they are
starting to book up, but the BU admin has let us know that we can get dorm
space is people so desire.
On 06/16/2015 05:13 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
Hi all,
In the last couple of IRCs we've been talking about
for other external services
that don’t use oslo.messaging notification to publish changes and are
willing to integrate with Congress this way.
Anyway, I can upload my draft bp for review at first.
Thanks.
BR
Zhou Zhenzan
*From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:t...@styra.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday
At the IRC this week, Bryan asked how he could replicate the environment we
used at the Vancouver hands-on-lab. So we added some basic instructions at
the end of the lab write-up.
https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1lXmMkUhiSZYK45POd5ungPjVR--Fs_wJHeQ6bXWwP44/pub
Bryan: hope that helps.
Hi all,
Since almost all the cores are on vacation next week, we're canceling the
IRC meeting on 6/30. Expect slow responses for reviews and email all next
week.
Tim
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hi Radek,
1. You can't use column references on any table except those created by a
datasource, mainly because Congress doesn't know the name of the columns
for those tables. We've kicked around the idea of letting policy-writers
declare the column names of any table, but it's trickier than it
these links are available on the wiki.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Congress
Tim
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:51 AM D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE)
jdand...@research.att.com wrote:
Tim,
On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
The telco slides are powerpoint
Hi all,
In the last couple of IRCs we've been talking about running a mid-cycle
sprint focused on enabling our message bus to span multiple processes and
multiple hosts. The message bus is what allows the Congress policy engine
to communicate with the Congress wrappers around external services
thoroughly (even replacing DSE).
Thanks.
BR
Zhou Zhenzan
*From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:t...@styra.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2015 05:14
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Congress] Mid-cycle sprint
Hi all
Hi all!
We settled on dates and location for the Congress mid cycle sprint:
Aug 6-7
VMware campus, Palo Alto, CA
Please RSVP if you plan to come so we can get a headcount.
Hope to see you there!
Tim
__
OpenStack
Sorry--hit the Send button by accident.
Hi Gosha,
This definitely sounds like an interesting use case for Congress. Keep in
mind that Congress doesn't itself do placement (though we did some
experimentation with that [1][2]). Some thoughts.
1. Let's suppose Murano/Congress/etc. allow us
AM Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-07-01 15:40:31 + (+), Tim Hinrichs wrote:
We settled on dates and location for the Congress mid cycle sprint:
[...]
Invoking the spirit of Thierry, please remember to add it to the
list at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki
Hi Gosha,
This definitely sounds like an interesting use case for Congress. Keep in
mind that Congress doesn't itself do placement (though we did some
experimentation with that [1][2]). Some thoughts.
1. Let's suppose Murano/Congress/etc. allow us to figure out which app
should be deployed in
Hi all,
We're contemplating a small syntax change in the Congress policy language
and wanted to see if it would cause anyone problems.
Currently you can write rules that give a single table differing numbers of
columns. In the following example, the 'error' table has both 1 column and
2
Looks like we merged a database schema change without the migration
script. I'm on it. (We'll get our tempest tests running in gate again
ASAP.)
Tim
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:36 AM Filip Blaha filip.bl...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Congress team.
Our jenkins job testing integration congress and
Hi Filip,
I just submitted a revert of the problematic change. Once it merges, all
should be well again. Sorry for the trouble.
Tim
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:57 AM Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com wrote:
Looks like we merged a database schema change without the migration
script. I'm
Thanks for sorting that out. +1ed the change.
Tim
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:53 PM Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote:
On 08/20/2015 09:32 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
It was just removed from global requirements, because it was not used.
That's clearly wrong. So let's refer that and add it
Hi all,
We managed to find a day/time where all the active contributors can attend
(without being up too early/late). The room, day, and time have all
changed.
Room: #openstack-meeting-2
Time: Wednesday 5p Pacific = Thursday midnight UTC
Next week we begin with this new schedule.
And don't
.
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Congress_Team_Meeting
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207981/
Tim
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:24 AM Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com wrote:
Hi all,
We managed to find a day/time where all the active contributors can attend
(without being up too early/late). The room
Hi all,
We just finished up a great 2 day sprint focusing on a new distributed
architecture for Congress. Details can be found in the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-liberty-sprint
Here's the summary.
1. Architecture. Each datasource driver will run in its own process;
Hi Rui,
The problem with the following rule is that there are a bunch of hidden
variables in the not cinder:volumes(...) literal. The error message
shows the hidden variables. The syntax restriction is that every variable
in a negative literal must appear in a positive literal in the body.
Could you show us the contents of /tmp/congress.conf?
Tim
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:09 PM Wong, Hong hong.w...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Tim and Alex,
I see congress recently added the HA functionality, and I was looking at
the tempest test code to understand how to start a replica. I created a
Hi Yingxin,
+1 to joining the sprint. If you can't make the mid-cycle sprint in
person, we're planning to have a remote option. Keep in mind though that
it will be harder to engage with everyone if you're remote.
We'll review your spec and get you feedback, but the purpose of the sprint
(Aug
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
