Re: Using GitHub Issues and Pages

2020-02-19 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello Thanks for https://spring.io/blog/2019/01/15/spring-framework-s-migration-from-jira-to-github-issues ! I love JIRA. I used it since ~2002 and even replaced Mantis/Trac/ClearCase with it in 3 of my previous companies. I don't know anything about Atlassian-Ops4J agreement. It works for me,

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
That's true, but I think that's also a drawback. The leak of governance and the fact we don't have any staging on releases could be seen as an issue. That's why it could be interesting to have this under the "Karaf Umbrella". Regards JB On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:58 AM 'Christoph Läubrich' via

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J
I always enjoyed the ease of contribution via github with minimal effort. While for apache-projects has always felt like a mess because of different hurdles. So I would defiantly vote for staying with github, dropping JIRA in favour of github issues (they improved the issue/project handling a

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, If option 4 is interesting, we have to remember: 1. First, in which Apache umbrella project. I don't think Felix is a good match as we might have some overlap with existing projects (felix http, ...). Maybe Karaf ? 2. We need to transfer IP and "PMC" set and ask in the Apache project

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

2020-02-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks for the update. I will proceed then. Regards JB On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:11 PM Oliver Lietz wrote: > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 11:40:53 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Sure. I will. > > Done. PAXEXAM-934 and dependency updates (fixing HTTP issue with Maven > Central). > >

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Oliver Lietz
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 3:25:31 PM CET 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote: > Hi, > > I fully agree on Toni ... > actually for PaxWeb it had always been an issue of not beeing an apache > project. > Therefore I'd go with option 4, the how-to would be needed to be worked > out. Really? But

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

2020-02-19 Thread Oliver Lietz
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 11:40:53 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Sure. I will. Done. PAXEXAM-934 and dependency updates (fixing HTTP issue with Maven Central). Please go ahead, JB. Thanks, O. > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 11:23, Oliver Lietz a écrit : > > On Wednesday, February 19,

Re: Maven Aether configuration

2020-02-19 Thread Oliver Lietz
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 10:52:49 PM CET Jared Whiklo wrote: > Hi all, Hi Jared, > I'm relatively new to Pax-Exam stuff, but have been using it to test > deployment of some resources in a Karaf container. This was working until > such time as the recent switch to required SSL for maven

Maven Aether configuration

2020-02-19 Thread Jared Whiklo
Hi all, I'm relatively new to Pax-Exam stuff, but have been using it to test deployment of some resources in a Karaf container. This was working until such time as the recent switch to required SSL for maven central. So I need to switch out any default repositories urls from

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J
Hi, I fully agree on Toni ... actually for PaxWeb it had always been an issue of not beeing an apache project. Therefore I'd go with option 4, the how-to would be needed to be worked out. regards, Achim Am Mi., 19. Feb. 2020 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek < gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: >

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello While being happy contributor of pax-logging, pax-web, pax-jdbc/jms/transx, pax-url, pax-cdi, I never wonder about how it works. I've never seen working https://ops4j.org site (it's now "it works!" page) and I assumed Atlassian is providing us (how?) JIRA + Confluence. I don't know what to

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Toni Thanks for bringing this discussion forward. I agree with your statements. Let me get back with comments and proposals. Regards JB Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 13:01, Toni Menzel a écrit : > *TL/TR:* > I'd be also happy to pay for ops4j.org (the one that is actively used > atm). > > *Long

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Toni Menzel
*TL/TR:* I'd be also happy to pay for ops4j.org (the one that is actively used atm). *Long version:* Since this is coming up now, there is a general question were to go with OPS4J in general. It predated github and probably was back then the easiest way to get hands dirty in a non-trivial java

Re: ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Niclas First of all, thanks a lot for all what you did (and still doing ). I’m ready to take the hand for the domain and finance them. Thoughts ? Regards JB Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 12:13, Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > Everyone, > In a few months time (June), the OPS4J domain names are up

ops4j domain names

2020-02-19 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Everyone, In a few months time (June), the OPS4J domain names are up for renewal. And I have been paying for those for 15 years now, and since I no longer participate in OPS4J I would like to transfer the domain names. But where to?? Ideally a foundation that would be Ok to take it over,

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

2020-02-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Sure. I will. Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 11:23, Oliver Lietz a écrit : > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 7:07:24 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi > > > > I will. > > Let me add some dependency updates and improvements before cutting the > release. Can you add version 4.13.2 to JIRA? > >

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

2020-02-19 Thread Oliver Lietz
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 7:07:24 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi > > I will. Let me add some dependency updates and improvements before cutting the release. Can you add version 4.13.2 to JIRA? Thanks, O. > Regards > JB > > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 00:35, Oliver Lietz a écrit :

Re: Using GitHub Issues and Pages

2020-02-19 Thread Oliver Lietz
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:16:01 AM CET Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I ... have never think about it. Maybe it is a good idea? Confluence is > quite good, but the content there is quite dated. JIRA is great software, > but it's of course subjective and lots of projects do their >