I always enjoyed the ease of contribution via github with minimal effort. While for apache-projects has always felt like a mess because of different hurdles.

So I would defiantly vote for staying with github, dropping JIRA in favour of github issues (they improved the issue/project handling a lot) to centralize development to one place.

Github even offers building "Actions" now so maybe this is also an alternative for custom build-server.

Am 20.02.20 um 07:17 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
Hi,

If option 4 is interesting, we have to remember:

1. First, in which Apache umbrella project. I don't think Felix is a good match as we might have some overlap with existing projects (felix http, ...). Maybe Karaf ? 2. We need to transfer IP and "PMC" set and ask in the Apache project community with a formal vote. 3. We will have to follow Apache process, especially for releases (meaning at least 3 days vote, 3 binding votes, etc), extending Apache pom, etc.

So, IMHO, we have really two options:

1. We keep OPS4J community, do a cleanup (announcing non active projects)
2. We move active Pax projects to Apache (obviously my preference would be Karaf).

Thoughts ?

Regards
JB

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:01 PM Toni Menzel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    *TL/TR:*
    I'd be also happy to pay for ops4j.org <http://ops4j.org> (the one
    that is actively used atm).

    *Long version:*
    Since this is coming up now, there is a general question were to go
    with OPS4J in general.

    It predated github and probably was back then the easiest way to get
    hands dirty in a non-trivial java based OSS community where trust
    was default. Think about it, back then everyone could get write
    access to the subversion repo and start hacking on new or existing
    projects. Including admin access to jira and whatever else was
    existing back then. Pax URL, Pax Runner, Pax Exam, Pax Construct
    etc. all got initiated by individuals without asking for permission.
    I mean.. thats Names like Pax Tinybundles got to life.. but oh well.

    Now, why am I writing this: there is - at least for pax url, web and
    exam - a huge user base that seems to be quite healthy. Even if
    there is just that "ops4j" name of the github organization now, no
    website etc.

    So, question: what are the options? Let me just drop them here that
    come to my mind (ordered from easy-as-py to more complicated options):

      * keep things as is, find individual sponsors like I do with the
        Build Server (who uses that still by the way??), and JB or me
        (this means I'd be also fine to pay for the org domain that is
        in active use,too btw). It would be good to have two different
        companies or legal entities backing this anyway.
      * Modernize OPS4J a bit. Get it a landing page at least and a
        clear who is behind all this, who pays etc. Maybe look at Github
        Sponsoring to spread costs across user base - avoid single
        entity control.
      * Maybe look into making it a proper foundation or at least an
        entity that makes the work here eligible for future donations. I
        am not sure of this is worth it. But i feel Open Source != Open
        Governance.
      * Retire non active projects and donate active projects to apache.
        Probably difficult because of Intellectual Property)

    wdyt?
    Toni


    *Toni Menzel | rebaze.com <https://www.rebaze.com> | growing
    developer culture

    *


    On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi Niclas

        First of all, thanks a lot for all what you did (and still doing
        😀).

        I’m ready to take the hand for the domain and finance them.

        Thoughts ?

        Regards
        JB

        Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 12:13, Niclas Hedhman
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :

            Everyone,
            In a few months time (June), the OPS4J domain names are up
            for renewal. And I have been paying for those for 15 years
            now, and since I no longer participate in OPS4J I would like
            to transfer the domain names. But where to??

            Ideally a foundation that would be Ok to take it over,
            otherwise to a trusted community member.

            Ideas are welcome, and should be discussed. I have no
            opinion and will simply follow what you all can agree on.

            ops4j.org <http://ops4j.org>
            ops4j.net <http://ops4j.net>
            ops4j.com <http://ops4j.com>


            Cheers
            Niclas

-- -- ------------------
            OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>

            ---
            You received this message because you are subscribed to the
            Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>.
            To view this discussion on the web visit
            
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKf7a0rzdkro7v-rxBV1p1-KkSMTE_BQT2HhUZyOUM9jyA%40mail.gmail.com
            
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKf7a0rzdkro7v-rxBV1p1-KkSMTE_BQT2HhUZyOUM9jyA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- -- ------------------
        OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>

        ---
        You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        To view this discussion on the web visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3QGMMWvzzCck96CxemuYgSiYWNcs%2BOGPXmtaKTthoJvrw%40mail.gmail.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3QGMMWvzzCck96CxemuYgSiYWNcs%2BOGPXmtaKTthoJvrw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- -- ------------------
    OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>

    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "OPS4J" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAEjgzHT%2BYNAL3CA1dsqGpevhpoYsU9OYVUBi%3Df%2BMT9_u5ta3fw%40mail.gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAEjgzHT%2BYNAL3CA1dsqGpevhpoYsU9OYVUBi%3Df%2BMT9_u5ta3fw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
--
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3Tgr%2Bx9Oe4RLq4%3DV0W4_nOv8XabaqrePa08i_i-PZcT7g%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3Tgr%2Bx9Oe4RLq4%3DV0W4_nOv8XabaqrePa08i_i-PZcT7g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
--
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/491e2d57-faca-424a-2c40-4fd50c8db1fa%40googlemail.com.

Reply via email to