发件人: joel jaeggli [joe...@bogus.com]
发送时间: 2017年1月19日 23:28
收件人: Tianran Zhou; opsawg@ietf.org
抄送: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; routing-...@ietf.org; Benoit Claise (bclaise)
主题: Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for In-Situ OAM drafts
Hi,
I thought I would try and
To add more comments:
On the L2SM meeting, several people (4 or more) believed the 3 service delivery
model examples ([I-D.dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang], [I-D.ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang]
and [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-yang]) are actually device models.
I think both of the two I-Ds ([draft-ietf-netmod-yang-mo
Dear OPSAWG,
In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE
extension draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like
to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be
adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
E
added by
direct application to IANA; there's no need for a draft or RFC.
However, the introduction and examples may be valuable, especially for
BGP experts who are less familiar with IPFIX.
I've no objection to adopting the draft.
P.
On 13/02/17 03:49, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Dear IPF
Hi,
Based on the discussion, here I try to clean up the confusion of the two I-Ds.
[draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification] classifies the yang modules into
"Network Service YANG Module" and the "Network Element YANG Module". And
usually, it uses "service module" to imply the "Network Serv
Hi Ignas,
Congratulations and welcome aboard!
Regards,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 11:20 PM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org; Ignas Bagdonas
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] New OpsAWG chair volunt
Hi Folks,
The joint meeting of OPSAWG and OPS Area is provisionally scheduled for
13:00-15:00 Thursday.
https://tools.ietf.org/agenda/98/
We start to accept presentation requests. Please send over your request.
Regards,
Tianran
___
OPSAWG mailing l
Dear OPSAWG,
Thank you for all your reviews and comments for this document during the
adoption poll.
We see sufficient interest to work on this I-D and support of adoption this
document as a starting point.
So let's go ahead.
The authors, please:
1. resubmit the document named draft-ietf-opsawg
Dear WG Members,
We just adopted the I-D draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 in this working
group. We want to do an IPR poll at the early stage.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02.txt?
If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the
dra
Hi WG,
The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled on Thursday, Afternoon Session I 1300-1500,
according to the final agenda.
Please send your request to the chairs for your presentation.
Best,
Tianran
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/
Dear WG Members,
We are currently preparing draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05 for working group last
call. Here is an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05.txt?
If you own or are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-05
pleas
Dear OPSAWG,
This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call for the document:
Manufacturer Usage Description Specification
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud/
Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections to
this mailing list.
Please ind
Hi WG,
The OPSAWG meeting is at 13:00-15:00 Thursday Afternoon session I, March 30,
2017.
The meeting agenda is posted according to the applications.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/agenda/agenda-98-opsawg-00
The speakers please send over your slides to the chairs.
Thanks,
Tianran
___
I am looking at the YANG tree. The overall structure of this module is clear
and simple.
In addition to the text improvement, what do you want to discuss and get
consensus wrt the YANG data model?
Regards,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On B
Thanks Tom for pointing this out.
We appreciate any review comment. That really helps to improve the document.
I think it's back on the right track now. Hopefully, the authors can respond to
more interactions.
Regards,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect
Hi Zongpeng,
Thank you very much for picking this work up. The new version has a significant
improvement on addressing existing comments.
One more question that many people may be interested. Whether this I-D has been
implemented or has plan to be implemented and deployed?
Best,
Tianran
>
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 12:23 AM
> To: Ignas Bagdonas
> Cc: Douglas Gash (dcmgash); opsawg@ietf.org; ops-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions, Stat
al Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:18 PM
> To: Tianran Zhou; Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil); opsawg@ietf.org
> Cc: Ian Farrer
> Subject: RE: [Softwires] Comments on draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-05
>
&
t; From: t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 12:57 AM
> To: Tianran Zhou; Ignas Bagdonas
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-tac...@ietf.org;
> opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-06 Contributions, Status
> and Plans
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 1:40 AM
> To: t.petch
> Cc: Tianran Zhou; Ignas Bagdonas; IETF OOPSAWG;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-tac...@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-
Hi Joe,
Congratulations and welcome aboard!
Cheers,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Clarke
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:09 PM
> To: Warren Kumari; opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Adding Joe Clarke as a chair.
>
Dear OPSAWG,
In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this service models
explained draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like
to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be
adopted as a WG document in OPSA
WG.
Cheers,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 9:55 AM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for
> draft-wu-opsawg-service-mod
Hi WG,
The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled on Tuesday, Afternoon Session I 1330-1530,
according to the final agenda.
Please send your request to the mailing list or the chairs for your
presentation.
Best,
Tianran
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
h
Hi Med,
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:15 PM
> To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-01.txt
>
nal Message-
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2017 4:55 AM
> To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; Tianran Zhou; opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained-01.txt
>
> How is the a
OK, your request is recorded.
You can use the slot for the two correlated drafts.
Tianran
From: li zhenqiang [mailto:li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 2:42 PM
To: Tianran Zhou; opsawg
Cc: opsawg-chairs
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Presentation in Prague
Hello Mr. Chair
@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 7:57 PM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org; Tianran Zhou
> Cc: Ian Farrer; Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil);
> draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-y...@ietf.org
> Subject: TR: New Version Notification for draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-07.txt
>
> Hi
.
Thanks,
Tianran Zhou,
Ignas Bagdonas,
Joe Clarke
OPSAWG co-chairs
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Hi OPSAWGer,
The face to face meeting is at Congress Hall III, 13:30-15:30 Tuesday
Afternoon session I.
We need a jabber scriber and a minutes taker.
Anyone would like to volunteer?
We can treat you with beer. :)
Thanks,
Tianran
___
OPSAWG mai
Hi Adrian,
>From the last page of the slides, it seem you still have some minor pending
>issues, and hope the working group can help. You can bring them to the mailing
>list.
When you think you have dealt with all the pending issues, of course you can
ask for the LC.
Cheers,
Tianran
-Ori
That's really good.
Let's initiate the last call soon.
And as you suggested, it would be a good idea to cross-post to Netmod.
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:23 PM
To: Tianran Zhou ; opsaw
Hi Brian,
Fortunately, we did not use the "chairs slides" finally in the meeting.
Instead, "OPS Area Administrativia" and "OPSAWG Administrativia" are used. Both
of them included the latest Note Well.
Let's remove the "chairs slides" from the material.
Thanks,
Tianran
> -Original Message---
Dear OPSAWG,
This is a notice to start a three-week OPSAWG WG last call for the document:
Service Models Explained
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained/
Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections to
this mailing list.
Please i
I agree with Juergen's comments. NAT is a widely deployed service. It's
reasonable to standardize the data model for network automation. I hope more
vendor representatives can help to improve this work.
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@j
.
Regards,
Tianran, OPSAWG co-chair
-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:06 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for Service Models Explained
Dear OPSAWG,
This is a
g (camoberg) [mailto:camob...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 6:31 PM
> To: Tianran Zhou
> Cc: net...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] Cross-post to Netmod for LC comments//FW: WG LC for
> Service Models Explained
>
> Tianran, OPSAWG,
>
> Now
Hi Authors,
We got pretty good suggestions and comments during the LC.
Could you please improve the document and send to the community?
Cheers,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017
Great!
Will work on the shepherd write up.
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 5:28 AM
> To: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: Post last call revision:
> draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-expla
Hi All,
Thanks authors for incorporating all the comments during the WGLC.
And we have received all responses to the IPR call.
So let's move forward and request the publication.
Please see the status information
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-model-explained/
Cheers,
Dear OPSAWG,
The following draft was sent to IESG, but received some critical comments.
Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10
Now the authors have addressed all the comments, and received confirmation from
th
Hi WG,
This call is concluded without objection on the revision.
Let's move forward to IESG.
Thanks,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:05 PM
> To: opsawg@ietf
Dear WG,
The IETF 100 Preliminary Agenda has been published,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/agenda.html
OPSAWG will meet 15:50-17:50 Tuesday Afternoon session II.
Please send a request to Chairs for the time slot.
Best Regards!
Tianran, co-chair
_
We have applied the YANG doctor early review. And it's better to present
current status of the draft on the coming meeting.
So that we can get another round revision before the last call.
Regards,
Tianran
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>
Hi Zhenqiang and the coauthors,
Based on your latest post, the co-chairs would like to suggest the following
improvements before issuing the LC.
1. It's still not clear why the proposed IEs are necessary and useful, although
you have some simple words in the introduction. It's better to add a s
Hi OPSA WG and OPS area,
We have posted the meeting agenda.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/agenda-100-opsawg/
Look forward to meeting with you on Tuesday.
The authors please send your slides to the chairs.
Thanks,
OPSA WG Co-Chairs
__
Hi WG,
The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community have posted the latest
drafts to the mailing list, and believe that the document is ready for LC.
This starts a 2 week WG LC on
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-04
Please read the above draft and send a
Hi Michael,
Thank you very much for your contribution!
Cheers,
Tianran
Sent from WeLink
发件人： Michael Richardsonmailto:m...@sandelman.ca>>
收件人： Jean
Quilbeufmailto:jean.quilbeuf=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org>>
抄送： opsawgmailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>
主题： Re: [OPSAWG]
Hi WG,
The IETF 115 preliminary agenda is posted.
The OPSAWG meeting is currently scheduled at 09:30-11:30 Wednesday Session I.
We open the call for presentation.
Please send over your request to the chairs.
And please arrange your travel if you are going to join the meeting on-site.
Cheers,
Tian
ei.com>>;opsawgmailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>;OpsAWG-Chairsmailto:opsawg-cha...@ietf.org>>
主题： Re: [OPSAWG] Call for presentation//FW: IETF 115 Preliminary Agenda
时间： 2022-10-12 04:23:59
Tianran Zhou wrote:
> The IETF 115 preliminary agenda is posted.
> The OPSAWG meeting is curr
Hi Thomas,
Only looking at the abstraction, I think you do not get Greg's comment on
on-path telemetry.
IMO, this IPFIX extension should only focus on the data export, while
independent of specific on-path telemetry protocols.
The following draft is a very useful reference for on path telemetry:
Hi WG,
The preliminary agenda is just posted.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/materials/agenda-115-opsawg-00
Please see if there is anything missing.
The speakers please send over your slides before the meeting.
Look forward to seeing you in London.
Cheers,
Tianran, Joe, Henk
__
we selected the IOAM terminology.
I hope this clarifies.
Regards, Benoit
On 10/21/2022 9:29 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Only looking at the abstraction, I think you do not get Greg's comment on
> on-path telemetry.
> IMO, this IPFIX extension should only focus on t
Hi Alex,
I think this is a very good discussion. I raised this question before in the
mailing list.
I think there may be some benefits:
1. The meta data can always go with the telemetry data, without explicit
subscription. This facilitates the close loop automation.
2. Another subscription to th
[mailto:a...@futurewei.com]
发送时间: 2022年11月19日 0:39
收件人: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org
主题: RE: Manifest need? Re: draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest
So, saving the invocation of one command to establish the “meta-subscription”,
that’s all this is for? And for this we are asking
Hi All,
Here is a notice from NOMCOM. Hope you could be aware and help.
The NomCom is tasked with selecting the IETF leadership, like the IESG and the
IAB. For the NomCom to be able to make an informed decision, they need feedback
from the wider IETF community.
Please, allocate some time to p
day, November 21, 2022 4:58 AM
To: Alexander Clemm ; Tianran Zhou
; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re:
draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest
Hi Alex,
The purpose of the Data Collection Manifest is to cover all possible MDT
mechanisms, not only YANG Push. There are ot
A new idea just pop up.
How to control the manifest data?
Periodically, event?
What if the telemetry data is event triggered, not period?
Cheers,
Tianran
发件人: Benoit Claise
发送时间: 2022年12月8日 0:56
收件人: Alexander Clemm ; Tianran Zhou
; opsawg@ietf.org
主题: Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re: draft
Hi WG,
This mail starts a WG Adoption Call for
draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/
Please reply your supports or objections.
We would really appreciate your comments.
Since there are holidays, this call w
.
Thanks,
Tianran
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou
发送时间: 2022年12月22日 10:26
收件人: opsawg@ietf.org
抄送: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme...@ietf.org
主题: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01
Hi WG,
This mail starts a WG Adoption
Hi Authors and Contributors,
Accompany with the WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and
contributors to confirm on the list.
Please respond if you are aware of any IPR related to this draft.
If you are aware of IPR, please indicate whether or not this has been disclosed
per IETF IPR
d 3 in IOAM-DEX.
Cheers,
Tianran
From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com [mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2022 5:13 PM
To: gregimir...@gmail.com; Tianran Zhou
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme...@ietf.org;
i...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your reply. Please see inline.
Cheers,
Tianran
From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com [mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 9:22 PM
To: Tianran Zhou ; gregimir...@gmail.com
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme...@ietf.org;
i
.
The fast path will process delay per-packet, but the export will only work on
mean/min/max delay.
Best,
Tianran
From: li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com [mailto:li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 4:23 PM
To: Benoit Claise ; thomas.g...@swisscom.com; Tianran
Zhou ; ippm
Cc: opsawg
psawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2022 10:26 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for
draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01
Hi WG,
This mail starts a WG Adoption Cal
Hi WG,
The IETF116 preliminary agenda is posted.
The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled at 09:30 - 11:30 Tuesday Session I.
We open the call for presentation on the meeting.
Please send over your request with the topic, speaker, time slot to the chairs.
Look forward to seeing you in Yokohama.
Cheers,
T
Hi Marisol,
Thanks very much for this revision. It's good to see you think about the
adaption to other inventory models.
Here I would like to raise my proposal on the inventory collaboration.
I think this draft covers too many things. My understanding, according to
figure 1, the focus should be
Hi WG,
We just posted the preliminary agenda for IETF116.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-116-opsawg/
It's really great that we got so many requests.
We prepare the schedule by first come first serve. So there are 3 topics can
only be presented when time allows.
Please check if there is
Hi Authors and Contributors,
Accompany with the WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and
contributors to confirm on the list.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palmero-opsawg-dmlmo/
Please respond if you are aware of any IPR related to this draft.
If you are aware of IPR, please
Hi WG,
This mail we start a two weeks working group adoption call for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palmero-opsawg-dmlmo/
Please show your support or objection in the mailing list.
Any comment and suggestion is welcome.
As this draft is part of the inventory related work, suggestions on
meeting is useful.
Best,
Tianran
From: Marisol Palmero Amador (mpalmero)
[mailto:mpalmero=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 8:36 AM
To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org; Rob Wilton
(rwilton)
Cc: Camilo Cardona ; Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
; Diego R. Lopez ; Shwetha
Hi WG,
I updated the order of the presentations to make the agenda more compact.
The speakers please get ready.
Cheers,
Tianran
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou
发送时间: 2023年3月16日 19:16
收件人: opsawg@ietf.org
抄送: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [OPSAWG] OPSAWG meeting agenda
Hi WG,
As we were all in IETF last week, people might not tend to deal with mail.
We would like to extend this adoption call for another two weeks for more
discussions and feedback. We will conclude on April 18.
Your comments and suggestions are welcome. Please help if you are interested on
the
Hi WG,
This mail concludes the WGAC for draft-palmero-opsawg-dmlmo-09.
It appeared very low interest from the mailing list.
The chairs decide not to adopt this work at present.
Tianran as co-chair
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Wednesday, April 5
Hi WG,
As we agreed on IETF 116, this mail starts a two weeks working group adoption
call for the following three related drafts:
Simple Fixes to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) IANA Registry
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucla-opsawg-ipfix-fixes/
Extended TCP Options and IPv6
Hi WG,
Accompany with the adoption call, this mail starts an IPR poll for the
following drafts.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucla-opsawg-ipfix-fixes/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-opsawg-tsvwg-
Congratulations to the authors and contributors!
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 1:28 PM
To: ietf-annou...@ietf.org; rfc-d...@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.
We conclude the IPR call.
We collected all the replies from authors. There is no IPR applies to these
drafts.
Tianran
Sent from WeLink
发件人： Tianran
Zhoumailto:zhoutianran=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org>>
收件人： opsawgmailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>
抄送： opsawg-chairsmail
Hi WG,
We conclude the adoption call.
There is consensus in the working group to adopt these three drafts.
Please resubmit the documents as draft-ietf-opsawg-xxx without change.
We received substantial comments. The authors please revise the documents in
the following version.
Cheers,
Tianran
Hi WG,
The IETF117 preliminary agenda is posted.
The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled on WEDNESDAY, July 26, 1300-1500 Session II.
We start to accept presentation request.
Please send over your request with title, speaker, time slot, and draft name to
the chairs.
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Mess
08 AM
To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for presentation//FW: IETF 117 Preliminary Agenda
Hi Tianran,
We would like to request some presentation slots:
-
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest/,
either Jean Quilbeuf or myself, 10 min
-
it
On 6/27/2023 3:10 AM, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> It's on my list.
> On draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest and
> draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing, why not in NETCONF?
>
> Best,
> Tianran
>
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSA
Hi Authors and Contributors,
Congratulations to your work!
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 2:36 PM
To: ietf-annou...@ietf.org; rfc-d...@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-edi...@rf
Hi WG,
The preliminary agenda is posted:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-117-opsawg/
Please see if there is anything missing.
Please contact us if you have any question.
Look forward to seeing you in SF.
Best,
Tianran, Joe, Henk
___
OPSAWG mail
I am not quite clear about the applicability of the inventory.
What’s the difference with hardware model or entity model.
I see energy work was related to entity mib in eman before:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/eman/documents/
It seems inventory should be something static from the name. But IMO
at 50%, 75% and 100% of the load don't.
I don't disagree with Alex when saying that this is not directly inventory, but
it's strictly related to it and should probably be an augmentation of the
device inventory.
BR
Daniele
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 3:20 AM Tianran Zhou
mailto:40h
Hi WG,
According to the decision from IETF117, we are going to run the working group
adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl/
Ahead the adoption call, we'd like to poll for known IPR.
Authors and contributors please respond to the m
Hi WG,
We collected replies from all the authors.
All the authors are not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. And there
is no question in the mailing list.
So we will proceed.
Best,
Tianran
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Friday
Hi WG,
This mail starts a two weeks working group adoption call for
draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl/
Please send over your objections or supports to the mailing list.
If you object the adoption, please also give the reason, so that the authors
adoption call. The authors please
consider and revise the draft in the following versions.
Cheers,
Tianran, as WG Chair
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 9:13 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject
QUESTION FOR THE CHAIRS
If this is split out, does it o into an individual draft for a further adoption
poll, or can it be split into a second WG ID at once?
ZTR> In my opinion, it should go into an individual draft. We adopted
draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl because of the whole solution. Scheduling
PM
To: Henk Birkholz ; Joe Clarke
; Tianran Zhou
Cc: Henk Birkholz ; Joe Clarke
; Operations and Management Area Working Group Discussion
List ; Robert Wilton ; Scott Mansfield
; Tatiana Kurakova ;
Tianran Zhou ; Warren Kumari ;
itu-t-liai...@iab.org; liaison-coordinat...@iab.org
Subject: New
Hi Marisol,
Could you please add the YANG tree in the draft? So that people can understand
your idea easier.
Best,
Tianran
Sent from WeLink
发件人： Marisol Palmero Amador
(mpalmero)mailto:mpalmero=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>
收件人： opsawgmailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Hi Authors,
I read this draft and I think this work is valuable.
There are several comments for your consideration.
1. We have YANG as the modeling language for configuration DM. For this draft,
do you have any formal language for the IM? While I think the tree diagram is
also clear, I am afra
Hi OPSAWG,
The IETF119 preliminary agenda is posted.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/agenda/
The joint OPSAWG and OPS Area meeting is scheduled at 15:30 - 17:00 Monday
Session III.
We are now available to accept presentations. Please send your request to the
chairs.
Look forward to se
Hi Jean,
Thanks for this request. I have put it on my list.
Best,
Tianran
From: Jean Quilbeuf [mailto:jean.quilbeuf=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2024 12:47 AM
To: Tianran Zhou ; OPSAWG
Cc: opsawg-chairs
Subject: RE: Call for presentations at IETF119
Dear OPSAWG
Hi WG,
The preliminary agenda for OPSAWG meeting at IETF119 is now posted.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-119-opsawg/
Please see if there is anything missing.
Welcome to join the meeting.
Best,
Tianran, Joe, Henk
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG
Hi Frank,
The agenda is really packed. We cannot accommodate this request.
But this does not block you from promoting your work in the mailing list.
Best,
Tianran
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xialiang(Frank, IP
Security Standard)
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2024 9:31
Hi Roland,
Thanks for sharing this interesting document to the mailing list.
But the agenda is really packed. We cannot give you the presentation this time.
I have a quick read about this draft. IMHO, if there is any new metric, should
this be in IPPM WG?
Best,
Tianran
From: roland.sch...@telek
Hi WG,
We only have 1.5 hours joint with OPS area this time. So our agenda is very
packed.
We adjust and post the final agenda:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-119-opsawg/
The speakers please control your time and please send over your slides to the
chairs two days before the meeting.
L
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
