Hi all,
sorry for coming late... just some thoughts, I don't claim to have all
the answers...
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Paul Martz wrote:
I am booked 100% with client work, and if my clients are content on the
current release, and there are no pending new features that the clients
need, th
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Paul Martz wrote:
> Robert Osfield wrote:
>>
>> Just for clarification, I'm not a significant way through the OpenGL
>> ES 2.0 port,
>
> I think you're intending to say that you're almost done with the port. Ahead
> of schedule, right?
Oh my, another one
Hi Robert --
Robert Osfield wrote:
Just for clarification, I'm not a significant way through the OpenGL
ES 2.0 port,
I think you're intending to say that you're almost done with the port.
Ahead of schedule, right?
If my current progress on the port keeps up we could well see the bulk
of th
Hi Paul el. al,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Paul Martz wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, we can branch the trunk either right now, or just prior
> to the start of Robert's GL ES2 work, and Chris could add his changes to the
> branch, and that branch could eventually lead to a 2.10 stable release
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
While I'm very opposed to the "nasty merge" part, I don't have any need to
force any
sort of branches or releases myself. I'm simply trying to look out for the
continued
maintenance of the entire trunk.
I, too, would like to see some increased bandwidth in handli
Paul Martz wrote:
> I am booked 100% with client work, and if my clients are content on the
> current release, and there are no pending new features that the clients
> need, then I have no funding or availability to support a new stable
> release.
And that's totally reasonable.
> Ultimately, Ch
Sorry to chime in late on this.
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
> It seems like we don't have any capacity in this regard right now.
I'll shorten the
> question -- other than Robert, who does have SVN commit access?
I am booked 100% with client work, and if my clients are content on the
current
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
wrote:
> Ok. I can understand that. Are there any aspects of submission review that
> could be
> outsourced?
I've already outsourced aspects of the submission review that are the
easy and most productive areas. osgAnimation and t
Robert Osfield wrote:
> Reviewing submissions is a double edge sword, as without keeping tabs
> on what is happening with the code I'm in poorer position to do
> support and fix bugs. Reviewing submissions is actually it's not the
> most burdensome side of my work as project lead. Driving release
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
wrote:
> I feel for your situation. I'm not very fond of getting torn between coding
> and the
> other side of business. I'd much rather code.
Curiously I'm torn between coding and coding, just that one side is
client focused and
Robert Osfield wrote:
I feel for your situation. I'm not very fond of getting torn between coding
and the
other side of business. I'd much rather code.
> As J.S. mentions a number of engineers have commit rights on the
> branches to help out with convergance towards and maintenance of
> releas
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
wrote:
> It seems like we don't have any capacity in this regard right now. I'll
> shorten the
> question -- other than Robert, who does have SVN commit access?
As J.S. mentions a number of engineers have commit rights on the
branc
Hi Chris,
It seems like we don't have any capacity in this regard right now. I'll
shorten the
question -- other than Robert, who does have SVN commit access?
Well, I think you've been with us for a while now, so you must have some
idea about this. It seems to me that whenever commit rights
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
> I don't think I'm qualified to nominate myself for this right now.
> However, I'm wondering who does have SVN commit access, and if one of these
> people is
> willing to accept interim changes? I have several finished changes ready to
> check in, and
> I worry ab
Robert Osfield wrote:
> have had to start this round of work immediately after completing
> other client work so haven't had a window opportunity to catch up with
> submissions and go for making 2.10 as I had originally hoped. If
> community members are keen to see a 2.10 release sooner rather tha
15 matches
Mail list logo
