Wow, the end of an era ...
Thanks for all the work BJ.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 9 Dec 2020, at 21:41, BJ Hargrave via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> As part of the mission transfer to the Eclipse Foundation, the osgi.org and
> mail.osgi.org servers will be soo
of tutorials. The trait model works very well for Javascript
since you can easily add fields and functions and everything is visible to
everybody. However, that means giving up type safety.
Good luck,
Peter Kriens
> On 18 Sep 2020, at 07:49, Zyle Moore wrote:
>
> Thank
of.
I've enclosed the files I used to verify that I did not make compiler errors
... which I probably did anyway. You can try them out. This is of course an
extremely minimal implementation.
Hope this helps. Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
TraitManager.java
Description: B
vice I have is to enjoy the many automatic fruits given
to you by bnd, based on the OSGi cap/req model. However, don't start eagerly
_looking for problems_ that fit this solution. When you have a new pain,
sometimes this is an awesome technique. Or not.
Hope this helps.
Kind regards,
P
elieve the benefits once you get there. On the highest
level, it takes most of the pain out of development and allows you to focus on
developing new functionality, the fun part. It is sadly our industry's best
kept secret :-(
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
[1]: https://www.aqute.biz/ap
accordingly.
This model is a lot less error prone.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 20 Aug 2020, at 03:30, Zyle Moore via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> Posted this at StackOverflow, but thought it might be better to ask here.
> ---
> The Deployment Admin Specifica
in mixing and
matching version.
Hope this helps, kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 6 May 2020, at 09:35, CHINCHOLE, SHANTESHWAR ASHOKRAO via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What exactly is the difference between compendium and enterprise
> specification of OSGi
I agree but I am not sure any member has enough interest to drive that through
a spec. It would still require the VMs to report it properly.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 13 Apr 2020, at 19:57, chris.g...@kiffer.be wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I would argue that it is
That is my experience on the ARM processor, there are so many variations,
32/64, le/be, floating point/no floating point, etc. that it is a bit of a mess.
In general, on ARM I see people define the properties themselves to whatever
the VM they use reports.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
ts instead which IMHO are easier to manage.
>
> And Peter to your question about using prototype scope, those objects contain
> state and it is my understanding that prototype scope is required in those
> cases.
>
> Thanks
> Alain
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:39 AM P
tml>
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
the OSGi
log to it? I've seen cases where the information was in the OSGi log but those
messages were discarded.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:03, Alain Picard via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> Question: The method getDiagnosticForEObject can be called
for the
videos, don't hesitate to contact me. Would be appreciated.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
It is surprisingly simple. :-)
Let's assume Oracle adds a new method to `java.nio.file.Path`. Would you care?
Unless you work for Azul, you'd like couldn't give a rats ass. Once you use
that new method you care, but before that moment it is irrelevant to you. That
makes you a _consumer_ of the
of
complexity. Today, quite often keeping it simple and stupid is actually good
enough.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 7 Aug 2019, at 09:49, Christian Schneider wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I also thought a bit about how to possibly make the deployments smaller.
>
>
etes and it worked scarily easy and reliable.
When I am hired to help one of the first things I look for is reduce as many of
the moving parts as possible. Yes, you can get anything to work but reducing
the possible errors cases really increases reliability imho.
Kind regards,
Peter Kr
. The Aggregate Service had some basic limitations because not all
components shared the same view at the same time.
It is a tricky area.
I read the RFC in detail. Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 26 Jun 2019, at 14:29, BJ Hargrave wrote:
>
> This seems just like
> https://github.com
I've developed a service that you can use to block the activation of a DS
component until a set of other services are ready. This is related to the
whiteboard pattern when the sender wants to be sure a certain set of whiteboard
services are present. Normally you can only assert the properties
> Considering this, lowering a lower bound of an Import-Package statement when
> resolving should be acknowledged as a bug.
>
I beg to differ ...
As said, you can set the consumer/provider policy to your desired strategy.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 18 Jun 20
egards,
Peter Kriens
> On 17 Jun 2019, at 12:14, Michael Lipp via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have in my repository a bundle A-2.0.1 that exports packages with
> version 2.0.1 and a bundle A-2.0.3 that exports these packages with
> version 2.0.3. Version A-
n
changing highly coupled domain code.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
>
> Can you go into a bit more detail about how to create smarter services using
> OSGi service dynamics? I think we might be able to extract some interesting
> patterns there.
>
> Christian
>
> Am S
issues.
Glad you like it! Looking forward to your PR's! :-)
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 15 Mar 2019, at 08:43, Bram Pouwelse wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I actually started to play with this cool new toy yesterday and I like it.
> It gives a lot more control ov
work and surely some
documentation. Volunteers welcome.
Let me know if this is useful and file issues on
https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/issues when there are issues or really good
ideas.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
make another case for the resolver. If I'd used that one
I'd seen it immediately.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
I probably would use a (static?) priority set with a weak reference to the
event object. (Or some key that uniquely identifies that object). The processor
can then consult this set to see if the event has higher priority. A weak
reference is needed to make sure that no events remain in this
experience taking a good look at the package
imports/exports and the service requirements tends to show that the resolver
has too many choices to make.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 22 Oct 2018, at 19:43, Alain Picard via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> We are experiencing some
The bnd code contains an AggregateRepository class that aggregates a number of
repositories defined by the OSGi Repository standard. It is actually used in
the bnd resolver API.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 12:26, Mark Raynsford via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
ould be a pity that out of pragmatism we forget that an
insane amount of problems are caused by our strenuous desire for backward
compatibility.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
>
> Sincerely,
> - Ray
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Peter Kriens
>
>
>>
>&g
just prefer a solution where I can debug all day on the same framework that is
never restarted. I also dislike hybrids since they tend to become quite complex
to handle on other levels.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
>
> Sincerely,
> - Ray
>
>
> This issue, the pr
ute/blob/master/osgi.enroute.logger.simple.provide>r
There are Gogo commands but I recall they had some issue.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 26 Aug 2018, at 21:05, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I’m sure that this question has b
I think you get the point …
A simple macro processor is ~10k and would go a long way to address the far
majority of the common requirements. And there is more than 6 years experience
with the model already :-)
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 21 Aug 2018, at 12:09, Christian Schnei
ity is only worth it if you can reuse the rules in many
different places. Hmm. Maybe a configuration plugin with a macro processor? :-)
Peter Kriens
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Tim
>
>> On 20 Aug 2018, at 17:08, Mark Hoffmann via osgi-dev > <mailto:osgi-dev@mail.os
at build time. I.e. the
Configurer replaces all @{…} with ${…}.
If you are using the new R7 Configurator then you are on your own ...
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 18 Aug 2018, at 18:51, Randy Leonard via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> To all:
>
> We are at
an NPE if an object
uses your service after unregistering.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 14 Aug 2018, at 05:20, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> In a concurrent system, if a class is immutable, the problem is simplified
> and the class
properties you can set to get more diagnostic info.
Sorry I can't help you more …
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 2 Aug 2018, at 16:41, Nhut Thai Le via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are trying to integrate Keycloak admin-client and zk into our web app
Yup, it got a bit windy ;-) I put it on my website as a blog since I've no good
other place at the moment.
http://aqute.biz/2018/08/02/the-service-window.html
<http://aqute.biz/2018/08/02/the-service-window.html>
Let me know if things are unclear. Kind regards,
Peter
ss I will turn it into a blog.
Anyway, usually disclaimer: none of the code has been tested so use it at your
own peril!
Good luck, kind regards,
Peter Kriens
[1]: https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/util.pushstream.html
<https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/
oid m2() {
delegate.getPromise().m2();
}
}
This works for you?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 22 Jul 2018, at 22:51, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> I’m not quite getting i
methods.
In general you want to afford this complexity and for example use a simple
init() method that blocks until init is done. However, the delegate has some
nice qualities if you switch more often than just at init.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 22 Jul 2018, at 10:35, David Lean
Promises http://aqute.biz/2018/06/28/Promises.html
<http://aqute.biz/2018/06/28/Promises.html>. They really shine in these
ordering issues.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 18 Jul 2018, at 00:16, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I h
fferent components.
You probably need to read up on the spec about the details …
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> Also, thanks a lot for this:
>> BTW, I updated the v2archive.osgi.enroute to build again. So the snapshots
>> are also available now again. I tried to rele
available now again. I tried to release this version but I did not have
authority. Will try to get that.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 16 Jul 2018, at 03:09, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Peter. That could actually be useful in some cases.
>
The v2Archive OSGi enRoute has a Configurer that uses a subset of the bnd Macro
language. This supports ${system;..} and ${system_allow_fail}. These take shell
command lines.
P
> On 14 Jul 2018, at 09:07, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, BJ.
>
> Yeah, right now I am
,
Peter Kriens
> On 12 Jul 2018, at 13:38, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> As always, thank you VERY much to all of you for your great suggestions. I
> will look into this from tomorrow. I didn’t know the concept of “bouncing”.
> That is interesting. Now that I
for R8.
Hope this helps. Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 12 Jul 2018, at 00:48, David Leangen via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> A question about component configuration.
>
> I have a component that has a required configuration policy. Using a (pre R7)
LOL. One of the first ‘memory tricks’ I had was that it looked like a butler
serving a tray. I.e. the publisher was ‘offering’ the service to the world.
Strange that it is still hard to remember :-)
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 29 Jun 2018, at 12:53, Fauth Dirk (AA-AS/EIS2-EU)
and failed.)
The service broker model in OSGi is very innovative but unfortunately badly
understood since it is so outlandish. Ah well, story of my life.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 28 Jun 2018, at 16:56, Dirk Fauth wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for the answers. Then I u
Not sure it is a good idea to repeat this picture for future confusion on a
mailing list?
Peter Kriens
> On 28 Jun 2018, at 16:10, Tim Ward via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> I think it is this picture that causes the confusion:
>
> <https://jaxenter.de/wp-content/upl
://enrouteclassic.github.io/ <https://enrouteclassic.github.io/>
I would prefer to move the articles and tutorials to the bndtools side when I
find time.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/m
That is a pretty harsh thing to do, gratuitously renaming this file?
Peter Kriens
> On 15 May 2018, at 10:43, Tim Ward via osgi-dev <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> wrote:
>
> The correct link is
> https://github.com/osgi/osgi.enroute/blob/deprecated/osgi.enroute.pom.
to not make them have inner
references. It is slightly more work for the receiver but it makes life so much
simpler overall …
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 14 Apr 2018, at 05:35, Peter via osgi-dev <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2018 6:32 PM, Neil Bartle
I am extremely interested in go and an OSGi like thing for it …
Oracle’s stewardship is becoming painful.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 13 Apr 2018, at 13:22, Balázs Zsoldos via osgi-dev
> <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if too of
Caught between a rock and a hard place with only one way forward …
Oracle’s strategy is a mystery to me.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 12 Apr 2018, at 20:06, Mark Raynsford via osgi-dev
> <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> wrote:
>
> Thought this might be of mild
Remote OSGi is a good example, but then then API can be viewed the provider.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 9 Feb 2018, at 01:12, Scott Lewis via osgi-dev <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> wrote:
>
> I think cases where the service consumer doesn't need or want the pro
different providers
for the same API version.
Exporting the API from the provider is usually the safest way imho and it works
very well without extra metadata with resolving.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 8 Feb 2018, at 21:01, Chris Gray via osgi-dev <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
the component context, they
should be there.
So what you can observe through the AggregateState service is not by definition
observable through optional services. A bit like relativity theory.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 2 Feb 2018, at 10:35, Thomas Driessen via osgi-dev
> <
Great minds think alike (and it helped we were both in this discussion) :-)
P
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 09:03, Timothy Ward via osgi-dev
> wrote:
>
> Ray - I assume that you’re asking why this is a MINOR change, rather than a
> MICRO change? It’s obviously not a major
or documentation fix but does not require
this micro version because the MICRO is stripped.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 5 Dec 2017, at 07:43, Fauth Dirk (AA-AS/EIS2-EU) via osgi-dev
> <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> IMHO it i
/osgi.enroute.pom.distro/distro-pom.xml
<https://github.com/osgi/osgi.enroute/blob/master/osgi.enroute.pom.distro/distro-pom.xml>)
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 1 Dec 2017, at 07:32, Paul F Fraser via osgi-dev <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The jetty
/configurer/simple/provider/Configurer.java#L331-L349)
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 19 Nov 2017, at 21:12, elias vasylenko via osgi-dev
> <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> wrote:
>
> Brilliant thanks for the response, I will absolutely file this in the issue
> tracker. I d
Using the OSGi enRoute Webresources, this automatically makes this module
available to your app.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 26 Oct 2017, at 20:37, Jesse Rao <jesse@liferay.com> wrote:
>
> I've worked through the Distributed OSGi tutorial up to the last
This does work. Sometimes the test class extends TestCase and then JUnit gets
confused. If you’re test methods are named ’testXXX’ then they do seem to work?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 6 Oct 2017, at 22:36, Paul F Fraser <pa...@a2zliving.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
nent(property=“name=mqtt”)
public class …
Hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 17 Aug 2017, at 10:07, Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>
> I am currently working on a little framework that offers components with a
> common service i
will support it. However, since there is no JSON standard for dates you
will have to make a choice what encoding to use and I am not sure that will be
easy since there is so much choice.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 26 Jun 2017, at 14:32, vijayakumar mohan <vj.kmr.mohan.offic...@gma
ou find that the most advanced workflow are with the bnd maven
plugins. As I stated, properly setup this can make your product a lot more
reliable and stable. However, there is no magic. You will still be required to
understand the parts.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 21 Jun 2017, at 14:1
The snapshot is also available on
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/osgi-snapshots/
<https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/osgi-snapshots/>
You can include this in a BndPomRepository or MavenBndRepository.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 14 Jun 2017, at 2
provider and whines.
You can remove the line in Private-Package with
osgi.enroute.examples.eval.parsii.provider
Please make a PR for the tutorial if you can.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
>
> Thank you!
> Bastian
>
> On 06/14/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Kriens wr
! eval "2 * 3"
6.0
If you want to help out file a bug on Apache Felix Gogo and provide a PR on the
tutorial to make this behavior clear.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
>
> On 14 Jun 2017, at 09:56, Bastian Faulhaber <bas.faulha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
&
Can you share your workspace on Github?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 13 Jun 2017, at 11:22, Bastian Faulhaber <bas.faulha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While following the maven onlyh tutorial I encountered a problem.
>
> In depend
I’ve created a fix, please test.
> On 12 Jun 2017, at 17:51, Karel Haeck wrote:
>
>
> There is an error in the initialization of the enroute InternalSchedulerImpl
> component. It was logged as issue 70 on github repo osgi.enroute.bundles
>
regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 10:26, João Assunção <joao.assun...@exploitsys.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm working in a service to support distributed events across OSGi
> containers. By distributed events, I mean forwarding events from one E
OSGi uses this directory for the spec so I would place your files in a
directory that is less likely to conflict. However, if you use a subdirectory
in OSGI-INF with a reversed domain name you’re pretty sure there will never be
conflicts.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 30 May 2
You can always look in your own bundle first, I cannot see how that could harm.
Seems also nice to be able to override things.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 29 May 2017, at 23:29, Mark Raynsford <list+org.o...@io7m.com> wrote:
>
> I have a work-in-progress implement
> On 26 May 2017, at 17:18, Mark Raynsford <list+org.o...@io7m.com> wrote:
> Hello!
> On 2017-05-26T14:23:43 +0200
> Peter Kriens <peter.kri...@aqute.biz> wrote:
>> Yes, you can reuse the Req/Cap model in OSGi for this.
>>
>> I understand the problem
that one DS component is shared between all versions of
applications. In this model the easiest is to register a single service for all
resources.
Hope this helps, kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 26 May 2017, at 13:16, Fauth Dirk (AA-AS/EIS2-EU)
> <dirk.fa...@de.bosch.com> wr
I’ve updated the next branch to not have the -SNAPSHOT. Not sure really where
that came from anyway.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 18 May 2017, at 17:54, BBrooks <brian.bro...@acm.org> wrote:
>
> > It should be without the SNAPSHOT. Can you recall how
/; \
revision=org.osgi:osgi.enroute.pom.distro:2.0.0; \
name=Distro; \
location=${build}/cache/enroute-distro.xml
It should be without the SNAPSHOT. Can you recall how the -SNAPSHOT got in
there?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 18 May 2017, at 16
to create a file system on it.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 17 May 2017, at 20:55, Simon Chemouil <ecli...@mithrandir.net> wrote:
>
> Michael Lipp a écrit le 16/05/2017 à 23:39 :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I searched to no avail. Does anybody know of an implem
, click on the flashlight in the repository
view.
Once there was JPM of course :-( I’ve heard you can also search for packages on
maven central.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 27 Apr 2017, at 12:11, Henrik Niehaus <henrik.nieh...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to create
How do you include the org.osgi.service.cm package? This is trivial in bnd but
I recall it was tricky in PDE?
Did you verify that the package is inside the bundle?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 26 Apr 2017, at 10:02, Fauth Dirk (AA-AS/EIS2-EU)
> <dirk.fa...@de.bosch.c
: services.
This keeps everybody happy internally for very little cost. I’ve included a
bndtools/enRoute example.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
— bnd.bnd
Private-Package: \
org.osgi.service.cm,\
com.foo.provider
Import-Package: \
org.osgi.service.cm
There only needs to be a single implementation, it will learn its properties
from other services. If we standardize it then any developer can leverage it.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 24 Apr 2017, at 19:12, Peter Kriens <peter.kri...@aqute.biz> wrote:
>
> I’ve
egards,
Peter Kriens
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
of assuming this is always the
component instance. The difference would be that getService() would only be
called once for any given instance since cardinality would be handled by DS.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 19:26, BJ Hargrave <hargr...@us.ibm.com&
Yes, that would solve this issue.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 14:02, Tim Ward <tim.w...@paremus.com> wrote:
>
> Peter - I assume that you mean that there will be no auto-generated
> osgi.service capability. Couldn't that be fixed with an add
But then you loose the DS dependency management on Foo … Since your
FooServiceFactory no longer promises to provide a Foo service :-(
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 12:35, Timothy Ward <tim.w...@paremus.com> wrote:
>
> DS isn’t intended to solve every
Thanks, fixed it. You can actually drag the URL on the ‘Local’ repository in
the Repository view in Bndtools, slightly easier.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 14 Apr 2017, at 08:43, Lothar Kluge <i...@lotharkluge.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
> i found a Probl
,
Peter Kriens
> On 3 Apr 2017, at 21:40, Mario Curcija <mario.curc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I noticed you both struggling with this one, so I gave it a try. While
> debugging I ended in felix's ManifestParser class.
>
> * Assumption:
> Felix OSGi framework
you.
Send the zip to me personally or send a link so I can download it.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 30 Mar 2017, at 16:47, HENRY Cedric D <cedric.d.he...@alstom.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The only bndrun file I have
it be easier to create a bndrun file with this setup?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 12:24, HENRY Cedric D <cedric.d.he...@alstom.com> wrote:
>
> I am not very familiar (yet) with Github nor with bndtools workspace.
>
> Still, related to what I mentioned in
gogo.html>
Enjoy! And please submit a PR to improve these app notes.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 08:18, HENRY Cedric D <cedric.d.he...@alstom.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I left the code downloaded from GIT as-is and followed the steps from the
> tutorial in order to see it working in full, which it did in when ran
requires angular in the
header (Require-Capability header)
Otherwise make a Github repo with the project and I can take a look. Kind
regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 21 Mar 2017, at 18:01, HENRY Cedric D <cedric.d.he...@alstom.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have follo
there is no cost
difference. However, in many scenarios the cost of different solutions could
vary.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 11:38, Milen Dyankov <milendyan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone aware of any attempt to use the requirem
buse it unnecessarily.
>
> Regards
> - Daghan
>
> Sent by MailWise <http://www.mail-wise.com/installation/2> – See your emails
> as clean, short chats.
>
>
>
> Original Message
> From: Peter Kriens <peter.kri...@aqute.biz>
> Sent: Mon
m. Recreating an object
works very nice and imho has hardly any consequences in a well designed OSGi
system.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -daghan
>
>
> Sent by MailWise <http://www.mail-wise.com/installation/2> – See your emails
&
as the
ProfileRunner.
Having file based configuration is always a bad smell in OSGi. Configuration
Admin looks different from what most developers know but it is quite powerful.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 12 Mar 2017, at 21:52, list+org.o...@io7m.com wrote:
>
&
fix it?
A bit puzzled? Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Rama G
>
>
> From: osgi-dev-boun...@mail.osgi.org [mailto:osgi-dev-boun...@mail.osgi.org]
> On Behalf Of Peter Kriens
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 6:36 PM
> To: OSGi Developer Ma
to deploy sources for some reason, e.g. IPR, then
you could remove them quite easily from the final JARs. However, the benefits
to have the exact source code in production has saved my ass several times.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 7 Mar 2017, at 21:06, Tanvir <tanvir.ah...@orac
be provided as a provider. The
application project would depend on the provider so that if you resolve the
REST provider is dragged in with its dependencies.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
>
> On 7 Mar 2017, at 12:23, rama.g <ram...@utthunga.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Pet
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo