value is FLOAT_MAX. Have
> a look at the ManageNoData application or even gdal_translate which can help
> you with that.
>
> Best,
>
> Victor Poughon
>
>
> De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [otb-users@googlegroups.com] de la part de
> Ag
Hi,
2 suggestions regarding the doc:
1. The tables for parameters lack a column with Default values
(e.g. Table in
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/Applications/app_DimensionalityReduction.html)
2. In general, a very simple case is provided as example, e.g.
otbcli_DimensionalityReduction
Hi!
Happy new year to everyone!
is there a way to ignore no-data values in otbcli_DimensionalityReduction?
Despite having 3.4028234663852886e+38 value set as no-data in the
geotif input image, the application uses pixels with that value as if
it were actual data, which considerably disrupts the
Hi!
Having an operation such as im1/im2
where both im1 and im2 are tif multi-spectral images with 0 set as
no-data value, otbcli_BandMathX complains about
"Generated 0 Underflow(s) And 836 Overflow(s)"
and the resulting tif image does not have the 3.4028234663852886e+38
value set as no-data
:
>
> On Thu 20-Dec-2018 at 14:57:38 +01, Agustin Lobo
> wrote:
> > Solved by following your advice!
> > After uninstalling all otb* items with synaptic, just starting the script
> > with
> > . /home/alobo/OTB-6.6.0-Linux64/otbenv.profile
> > let otbcli* and o
:
>>
>> Hi Agus,
>>
>> On Thu 20-Dec-2018 at 11:08:52 +01, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>> > Thanks Guillaume. I think I have "environment problems"!!
>> >
>>
>> Some will say this is fake news.
>>
>> I would suggest removing any OTB install a
bo/OTB-6.6.0-Linux64/lib where the good library is located.
>
> The fact that the correct otbcli_* is found is misleading, because the
> command line applications are just wrappers for shared libs.
>
> On Thu 20-Dec-2018 at 13:02:13 +01, Agustin Lobo
> wrote:
> >
/alobo/OTB-6.6.0-Linux64' and your system OTB libs
> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOTBCommon-6.6.so.1'.
>
> Maybe add some prints in the ./tmp/test.scr script to check the
> content of variables like OTB_APPLICATION_PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, just
> before calling otbcli_BandMathX
>
In order to run otbcli* commands from within R, I normally use the R
system() command that let run any system command as if it were on the
terminal.
For otbcli_BandMathX I have a problem. I write from within R a simple
text file with the following script (as ./tmp/test.scr)
source
Is it possible to apply an affine transformation with OTB to a
multi-spectral image if I already have the warp matrices?
i.e, I have
Band 0:
[[ 1.0082961e+00 -5.3054937e-03 -2.3114878e+01]
[ 5.3970655e-03 1.0079731e+00 -1.1763083e+01]]
Band 1:
[[ 1.0042849e+00 -2.0881288e-03 -1.5287690e+01]
[
Just to add some more info: it works with gdal_pansharpen.py
While this alternative is ok for us by now, I think otb offers more
choices of methods
and I keep interested on a solution for this problem.
Agus
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:49 PM Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> I run
> otbcli_Pansharpe
ter to the full dimension, it will stretch
>the one-line image to fit the full image
>- you tell GDAL to use nearest neighbor interpolation : resampling="nearest">
>
> Regards,
> Guillaume
>
> On 11/05/2018 06:40 PM, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> In order to c
_
> De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [otb-users@googlegroups.com] de la part de
> Agustin Lobo [alobolis...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 7 novembre 2018 18:35
> À : agustin.l...@ictja.csic.es; otb-users@googlegroups.com
> Objet : [otb-users] Re: otbcli_BandMathX missing i
I run
otbcli_Pansharpening -inp pan.tif -inxs reflhyper.tif -out
reflPansharp.tif float
and get
2018-11-07 18:29:10 (INFO): Default RAM limit for OTB is 128 MB
2018-11-07 18:29:10 (INFO): GDAL maximum cache size is 798 MB
2018-11-07 18:29:10 (INFO): OTB will use at most 8 threads
2018-11-07
I've solved this by installing the OTB.6.6.0*.run file from the web
page, but you should notify Debian that their package is not correct.
Agus
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:09 PM Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> I have OTB 6.6.0 on Debian (I think installed from Debian repo) and
> while I have otbcli
I have OTB 6.6.0 on Debian (I think installed from Debian repo) and
while I have otbcli_BandMath,
otbcli_BandMathX is missing. Why could this be? Might I have a missing package?
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you
n a 8bit interval, does
> this mean that your input was between [a,b] with a,b any float values before
> the stretch ?
> If so then you should use the application with min and max set to a and b
> respectively.
>
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> Antoine
>
>
>
> O
In order to calculate reflectance from a multi-spectral radiance image
acquired with a linear scanner, I also have a 1-row array of white
reference values,
that is:
multi-spectral image A: x rows, y cols, z bands
multi-spectral white reference image B: 1 row, y cols, z bands
I would need to
We have computed HaralickTextureExtraction (simple) with a float32
image and got a result with many 0, while if we input the same image
previously stretched to a 0-255 interval and written as
UINT8 data type the results make a lot of sense. It looks like there
are limitations on the data type and
I mean apt update
Agus
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:05 PM Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> Solved after apt upgrade...
> Agus
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:28 AM Agustin Lobo wrote:
> >
> > When I try to upgrade libotb* to 6.6.0 using synaptic,
> > I get messages such as:
> &g
Solved after apt upgrade...
Agus
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:28 AM Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> When I try to upgrade libotb* to 6.6.0 using synaptic,
> I get messages such as:
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/q/qtbase-opensource-src/libqt5opengl5-
; We will look into it as soon as possible
>
> sorry about that !
>
> Victor Poughon
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : otb-users@googlegroups.com De la part de
> > Agustin Lobo
> > Envoyé : jeudi 13 septembre 2018 09:55
> > À : otb-users@googl
When I try to upgrade libotb* to 6.6.0 using synaptic,
I get messages such as:
W: Failed to fetch
http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/q/qtbase-opensource-src/libqt5opengl5-dev_5.11.1+dfsg-8_amd64.deb
404 Not Found [IP: 82.194.78.250 80]
Is the server down?
Thanks
Agus
--
--
I have notes with links to otb doc such as
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/CookBooksu90.html
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/CookBooksu85.html#x113-5710004.6.7
which do not work any more.
Is there any way to find the corresponding current ones?
Also, I search using the "Search
this info should
> available elsewhere for the user:
>
> https://gitlab.orfeo-toolbox.org/orfeotoolbox/otb/issues
>
> To start we can perhaps add references to this doxygen pages in the
> HaralickTextureExtraction application documentation.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ma
Not all metrics potentially output by
otbcli_HaralickTextureExtraction
are actually defined in the reference by Haralick. Could you point to
the appropriate reference(s)?
(or perhaps they are defined somewhere else in in the doc?)
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
Rashad,
Could you be more specific?
MPI is not mentioned on any of the docs you point out:
https://wiki.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php/OTB_development_on_Linux or
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/SoftwareGuide/SoftwareGuidech2.html
How do we "configure OTB with OTB_USE_MPI" ? Is it a matter of editing
ers@googlegroups.com] De la
>> part de Agustin Lobo
>> Envoyé : jeudi 17 mai 2018 13:41
>> À : otb-users@googlegroups.com
>> Objet : [otb-users] Apply geometric transformation based on pithc, roll and
>> yaw
>>
>> Hi!
>> Is it possible to use OTB to a
Hi!
Is it possible to use OTB to apply a geometric transformation based on
pithc, roll and yaw?
Thanks
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "otb-users" group.
To post to this group, send email
See this thread:
http://otb-users.37221.n3.nabble.com/otbcli-on-windows-td4029836.html#a4029854
Agus
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jordi Inglada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the recommended solution to use a bash shell on windows 10 in order
> to run the command line
etc)
are always scarce, perhaps not enough for a reasonable sensor model, but
sufficient for a simple 2nd order polynomial.
Agus
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Guillaume Pasero <guillaume.pas...@c-s.fr>
wrote:
> Hi,
> On 03/21/2017 09:18 AM, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> I guess the se
aders.
> Guillaume
>
>
> On 03/17/2017 06:06 PM, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> Hi!
> I would suggest including the following in Monteverdi
> (I know both suggestions can be done by computing in OTB first,
> but it would be convenient having them straight for display)
> 1. D
neering &
Remote Sensing 61: 935–44.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244485309_Incorporation_of_relief_polynomial-based_geometric_corrections
Agus
>
>
> On 03/17/2017 04:56 PM, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>
> Is it possible to fit and apply a simple polynomial (not rational) for
> geometry co
Hi!
I would suggest including the following in Monteverdi
(I know both suggestions can be done by computing in OTB first,
but it would be convenient having them straight for display)
1. Decorrelation stretching
(see example i.e. http://matlab.izmiran.ru/help/toolbox/images/enhanc20.html)
2. Color
Is it possible to fit and apply a simple polynomial (not rational) for
geometry correction with OTB?
Is it possible to apply such a polynomial using x,y,z coordinates as
suggested in
Pala, V., and X. Pons. 1995. “Incorporation of Relief in
Polynomial-Based Geometric Correction.” Photogrametrics
In the Exact Large-Scale Mean-Shift segmentation section of the cookbook,
otbcli_LSMSSegmentation uses smooth.tif as input
(https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/Applications/app_LSMSSegmentation.html)
, but in step 1 the output of otbcli_MeanShiftSmoothing is
MeanShift_FilterOutput.tif
Thanks. I get that this is a Mac peculiarity, but does ti have any
effect on the result?
I will compare to the results on a linux machine as soon as I can.
Agus
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Rashad wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 8:59:56 AM UTC+1, Rashad
Thanks!
As far as I can tell, the issue of Monteverdi from *OTB 5.10.0 *crashing as
soon as the OTB tools were started up
on MacOSX 10.9.5 has been fixed.
I'm just an occasional user of Monteverdi and OTB on mac, so I did not run
a comprehensive testing.
Agus
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:22 PM,
I'm performing a set of otbcli_LSMSSegmentation runs with the same input image
and constant ranger=3 but varying spatialr (3,5,10,25,100) and always
get the same result. Is this normal?
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message
When I run:
$ /Users/agustinlobo/Downloads/OTB-5.10.1-Darwin64/bin/otbcli_LSMSSegmentation
-in filtered_range100b.tif -inpos filtered_spat.tif -out
segmentation.tif uint32 -ranger 5 -spatialr 5 -minsize 0
I get:
readlink: illegal option -- f
usage: readlink [-n] [file ...]
Then the process
ely send a message on this list as soon as possible.
>
> Feel free to ask again in 2 months or so if you still haven't heard anything.
>
> Victor Poughon
>
>
> De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [otb-users@googlegroups.com] de la part de
Hi! Thanks for the new version.
The Monteverdi binary crashes as soon as you open the OTB Applications
Browser on Mac OSX 10.9.5
Version 5.8 works fine (I did not try 5.9). Let me know if there is
something you want me to test.
Agus
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Poughon Victor
Guillaume,
many thanks for this improvement, it certainly will make scripts much
cleaner.
Regarding your questions:
.../...
>
> We would like to have your feedback on several points :
>
>- We will likely change the keyword "*band*" to plural "*bands*", no
>objection ?
>
> No problem,
I have a couple of persons interested on attending OTB
courses/tutorials/training sessions,
is there any to be held this year?
Thanks
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "otb-users" group.
To
I do not work on win and cannot check this myself
Is it possible to use the OTB command line applications otbcli* on windows?
I remember windows having sort of limited console...
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you
I'm trying to optimize the execution time of LMSVectorization.
I've noted that most time is spent at the "Merging polygons across tiles" phase,
so I've increased tilesize: The point is that this step takes the same time
no matter the tilesize value (and hence, the nb of tiles). I can
increase
Is there a way to perform a local stretching with OTB using an slicing window
as in e.g http://imagej.net/Enhance_Local_Contrast_(CLAHE) ?
This is as if the recent interactive tool in Monteverdi could be
systematically applied to the entire image.
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
A command such as
otbcli_LSMSSegmentation -in filtered_range.tif -inpos
filtered_spat.tif -out segmentation.tif uint32 -ranger 3 -spatialr
5 -minsize 5 -tilesizex 256 -tilesizey 256
results on a segmentation.tif file with many patches that have a 0
value, including many isolated pixels.
Bonjour,
Is this band subseting going to be implemented on 5.10?
Agus
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Manuel Grizonnet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO there is no way to do this for now without Splitting and concatenating
> bands. During last OTB user days, Guillaume and I
Sure:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=$PATH:/home/alobo/OTB-5.8.0-Linux64/bin
PYTHONPATH=/home/alobo/OTB-5.8.0-Linux64/lib/python:$PYTHONPATH
GDAL_DATA=/home/alobo/OTB-5.8.0-Linux64/share/gdal
GEOTIFF_CSV=/home/alobo/OTB-5.8.0-Linux64/share/epsg_csv
export LC_NUMERIC=C
export PATH
export GDAL_DATA
export
Another minor but practical question:
Even if I have run
source otbenv.profile
and
export OTB_APPLICATION_PATH=/home/alobo/OTB-5.8.0-Linux64/bin
I still cannot use otb_cli application without the
/home/alobo/OTB-5.8.0-Linux64/bin path:
$ otbcli_MeanShiftSmoothing
bash:
If I do:
otbcli_LSMSSmallRegionsMerging -in filtered_range.tif -inseg
segmentation.tif -out segmentation_merged.tif uint32 -minsize 7
-tilesizex 256 -tilesizey 256
otbcli_LSMSVectorization -in filtered_range.tif -inseg
segmentation_merged.tif -out sminiPCA3MSS_r50_s5_R10_S5_m7.shp
-tilesizex 256
Hi!
I do not see any request for change on displaying shape (and/or other
vector formats)
files in Monteverdi (e.g. after segmentation), although it is listed
in the wishlist.
Does this imply that adding this feature is not really planned?
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
Hi!
Is Monteverdi2 superseded by the Monteverdi that is included
within Orfeo ToolBox 5.8 ?
Is there any reason to keep Monteverdi2?
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Also, cannot find the syntax for matrix multiplication
in BandMathX
Agus
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Agustin Lobo <alobolis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks,
> Regarding BandMathX, I understand I would do it through Monteverdi2
> and inputing my parameters using "Import co
Can I apply a matrix of factors to a multi-spectral image using BandMath?
i.e.
ima %*% f
where
ima: multi-spectral image (i.e. 2000 x 900 x 7)
f: matrix of coefficients, i.e. 7x7 matrix
%*% matrix multiplication
ima would be operated as a 180 x 7 matrix
Thanks
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ
Despite running
otbcli_LSMSSmallRegionsMerging -in filtered_range.tif -inseg
segmentation.tif -out filtered_range.tif uint32 -minsize 5 -tilesizex
256 -tilesizey 256
I still get a large number of segments of just one pixel.
Maybe a question for the tutorial...
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
sers@googlegroups.com] de la part de
> Agustin Lobo [alobolis...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 6 juin 2016 15:51
> À : otb-users@googlegroups.com
> Objet : [otb-users] Running otbenv.profile does not update my env. variables
>
> I have just installed OTB-5.4.0 using the self-extr
I have just installed OTB-5.4.0 using the self-extracting binary
version for Linux.
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/CookBooksu2.html#x10-90001.2.2
states:
"you should before initialize your environment with otbenv.profile"
I do:
sudo chmod a+x otbenv.profile
./otbenv.profile
or
sh
Just tried Monteverdi 3.2 on Mac.
After downloading and
sh OTB-5.4.0-Darwin64.run
Double click on Monteverdi.app does nothing and from the terminal I get:
$ open -a Monteverdi.app
LSOpenURLsWithRole() failed for the application
/Users/agustinlobo/ALOBOWORK/OTB-5.4.0-Darwin64/Monteverdi.app with
The doc
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/CookBooksu35.html#x53-660003.3.4
states:
"The segmentation will group together adjacent pixels whose range
distance is below the ranger parameter and (optionally) spatial
distance is below the spatialr parameter"
if the pixels are adjacent, then they
A long time ago, an otb user asked
> "
> I notice that if I change the sequence of the bands ( ie from RGBLIDAR to
> LIDARRGB ) the output clustered image is different
> Is this reasonable?
> "
and On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jonathan Guinet
indicated that
"
> To reduce exploration space
What is the difference between otbcli_Segmentation -filter meanshift ...
with the suite:
otbcli_MeanShiftSmoothing
otbcli_LSMSSegmentation
otbcli_LSMSSmallRegionsMerging
otbcli_LSMSVectorization
?
Thanks
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this
Where can we find the list of available features that can be selected for this
application? The example just mentions perimeter and the list is not
included in the documentation
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/CookBooksu120.html#x152-913002132
I mean just a plot of DN (which would be reflectance in case the image
has been calibrated)
against wavelength (just band number is not enough because different
systems have
different spectral characteristics). By default, the x-axis could be
band number, but a simple text file with wavelengths
Is it possible to apply a coarsening with otb? It is just a mean
(or median ...) filter in which the output resolution matches the
size of the window. Also, the window slicing step should be a parameter
(i.e., move a 25x25 window at steps of 25 over an image of 1m pixels and produce
an output with
The doc leaves me with some doubts regarding Line segment extraction
1. Is this the hough transform?
2. If not, is there a Hough transform with otbcli app?
3. In case of multi-spectral image, how does this algorithm proceed? does it
select just the first band?
4. Last, but not least, running the
I would really appreciate a tool for displaying signatures as a plot
as you browse and click with the mouse
over the image. As images become more multi and hyperspectral, seeing
values is not enough.
Also, getting the equivalent otbcli command in the log window would be
nice. One use of
all my applications up and running on a rolling distribution.
Agus
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Rashad Kanavath
<mohammedrasha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You have:
> Architecture: i686
>
> what is arch command says ? For me it is x86_64
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 a
Nice knowing there will be another users meeting, hopefully I can make
it this time.
Nevertheless, why do you plan for the busiest months for field campaigns? I can
book all those days now, but, afterwards, if campaigns have to be
moved because of weather or logistics
problems I will have to
Are there a priori or even experimental reasons
to think that the linux standalone binary version
would have a lower performance (slower apps) than
a compiled version?
Thanks
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you are subscribed
libqwt.so.5" CACHE STRING "" FORCE)
>
> Regards,
>
> http://orfeo-toolbox.org
>
> Stéphane ALBERT
> Ingénieur d'études et développement
> Business Unit E-SPACE & Geo Information, Département APPLICATIONS
>
> CS Systèmes d'Information
> Parc de
I've tried the linux standalone binary version provided in
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/download/
on my Debian testing machine
and does not work. Just get hundreds of lines such as:
./pkgsetup: line 31:
/home/alobo/Downloads/OTB-5.2.0-Linux64/tools/patchelf: cannot execute
binary file: Exec
tegrity... All good.
> Uncompressing OrfeoToolBox 5.2.0 100%
> Configuring...
> rkanavath@debian:/tmp$
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Agustin Lobo <alobolis...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I've tried the linux standalone binary version provided in
this is something worth adding to our
> backlog. I can provide a list of possible algorithm and related papers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien
>
>
> Le 13/01/2016 19:05, Agustin Lobo a écrit :
>>
>> My idea was just applying a linear stretching using a moving window, but
In order to compile Monteverdi for Debian, is there a git such as for otb
or should I use one of the tarballs?
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "otb-users" group.
To post to this
?
>
> Victor Poughon
>
>
> De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [otb-users@googlegroups.com] de la part de
> Agustin Lobo [alobolis...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 14 janvier 2016 12:40
> À : otb-users@googlegroups.com
> Objet : [otb-users]
Following
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/SoftwareGuide/SoftwareGuidech3.html#x17-260003
I've installed ice with no problems.
But then, I get these problems with monteverdi-configuration.cmake:
I do not have /usr/include/qwt5-qt4
I have /usr/include/qwt-qt4
I do not have /usr/lib64/libqwt.so.5
I
ich algorithms are you thinking of?
>>
>> I know that ITK got a long list of image enhancement algorithms:
>>
>> http://www.itk.org/Doxygen/html/group__ImageEnhancement.html
>>
>>
>> Le 11/01/2016 09:17, Agustin Lobo a écrit :
>>> Hi!
>>> Is the
ld be nice to have other methods available through cli.
>
> Which algorithms are you thinking of?
>
> I know that ITK got a long list of image enhancement algorithms:
>
> http://www.itk.org/Doxygen/html/group__ImageEnhancement.html
>
>
>
> Le 11/01/2016 09:17, Ag
Hi!
I've just completed the compilation of OTB following
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org//SoftwareGuide/SoftwareGuidech2.html#x14-190002
2.1.2 SuperBuild: Build OTB and all dependencies
on a Debian testing (stretch) machine.
Everything seemed to go ok, but at the end:
Hi!
Is there an adaptive enhancement filter in OTB(cli)?
Thanks
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "otb-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to otb-users@googlegroups.com
To
Are MNF and its inverse available as an otbcli application?
MNF is described in
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/SoftwareGuide/SoftwareGuidech18.html#x46-26900018.3
but is not an option in
https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/CookBooksu94.html#x126-5520005.5.2
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
No matter the size of the slicing window, the image I get
as inverse of NA-PCA is identical to the input image.
While this makes sense for regular PCA, AFAIK NA-PCA
should estimate the noise and render a denoised image as inverse.
Am I wrong? Is the method not well implemented?
Also, what the
How can I make my own otbcli application
for, i.e.,
https://github.com/inglada/OTB/blob/master/Examples/Patented/EstimateAffineTransformationExample.cxx
?
In other words, how do I compile that example?
Agus
--
--
Check the OTB FAQ at
http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html
You received this
el origin conventions.
> This problem is fixed in release 4.2. I don't see this bug in current
> version.
>
> Regards,
> Guillaume
>
> On 09/08/2015 01:40 PM, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>> The result of otbcli_RigidTransformResample leaves and edge effect (0 values
Before compiling I would like to check if I do have all the required
dependencies
with their respective versions.
Is there a command to check them all?
Otherwise, how can I do it for each of the libraries listed under table 2.1 in
The result of otbcli_RigidTransformResample leaves and edge effect (0 values)
in the bottom and right sides of the images:
$ otbcli_RigidTransformResample -in meanFRX5.tif -out /tmp/test.tif
-transform.type id -transform.type.id.scalex 64
-transform.type.id.scaley 64 -interpolator linear
(same
di@cesbio.eu> wrote:
>> > Hi Agus,
>> >
>> > Maybe a silly question: are these negative values large?
>> >
>> > This could be due to numerical precision errors in the estimation, since
>> > the entropy itself is estimated using histograms
otbcli_FineRegistration using MI as metric produces negative values
(saved to the 3rd layer of the result of otbcli_FineRegistration).
For example, in
otbcli_FineRegistration -ref StereoFixed.png -sec StereoMoving.png
-out FineRegistrationMI.tif -erx 2 -ery 2 -mrx 3 -mry 3 -m MI
The 3rd "band"
negative values large?
>
> This could be due to numerical precision errors in the estimation, since
> the entropy itself is estimated using histograms.
>
> Jordi
>
> Agustin Lobo <alobolis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> otbcli_FineRegistration using MI as metr
At least otbcli_FineRegistration has trouble to deal with path names
that include an space,
even if the path name is provided within ' '
I know having spaces in path names is an unnecessary complication but
some external drives get that kind of name automatically.
This is a simplified example:
,
>
> Julien
>
>
> Le 02/09/2015 08:47, Agustin Lobo a écrit :
>>
>> At least otbcli_FineRegistration has trouble to deal with path names
>> that include an space,
>> even if the path name is provided within ' '
>> I know having spaces in path names is a
if -sec /tmp/imain_1.tif -out
> /home/alobo/mi\ tmp/IMG_0013FRX1.tif -erx 5 -ery 5 -mrx 100 -mry 100
> -ssrx 50 -ssry 50 -m MRSD
>
> Guillaume
>
>
> On 09/02/2015 09:09 AM, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>> Done.
>> By now I circumvent the problem using a soft link with no spa
nd plot it in order to find if there are wrong matches.
>
> Regards,
> Guillaume
>
> On 09/01/2015 02:21 PM, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>> I'm testing Rigid Transformation Resample to apply a model fitted out
>> of set of Homologous Points. (I'm also testing using a model
n Michel <julien.mic...@cnes.fr>
wrote:
> Le 31/08/2015 14:29, Agustin Lobo a écrit :
>
> Actually, I do not quite understand:
> Is mfilter stating whether homologous points are filtered according to the
> value
> of "precision"?
>
> yes
>
> What do you me
orientation).
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale-invariant_feature_transform
>
> Le 01/09/2015 09:37, Agustin Lobo a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the explanation. This kind of background is essential to
> understand the methods an
I'm testing Rigid Transformation Resample to apply a model fitted out
of set of Homologous Points. (I'm also testing using a model derived
from interactive
points as well as Fine Registration, but that's another story).
Interband misalignments are substantial as the images come from a
multicam
colocalisation in first image exceed this *precision*."
>
> But we can update the documentation of the parameter if you think this is
> not clear enough.
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien
>
>
> Le 10/06/2015 10:00, Agustin Lobo a écrit :
>
> Doc on Homologous Poi
I get a lot of warning messages using otbcli_FineRegistration because
one of the 2 images have all 0 around the boundaries so that the size
of the 2 images
matches. For example, I get many:
WARNING: In
/build/buildd/otb-3.20.0/Code/DisparityMap/otbFineRegistrationImageFilter.txx,
line 444
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo