Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheers Jon From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: 04 September 2020 22:08 To: slitk...@cisco.com; msiva...@gmail.com; jefftant.i...@gmail.com; Jonathan Hardwick ; Mahend Negi ; c

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt

I support publication. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: 08 November 2019 16:07 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt Hi WG, As instructed by our AD, I-D has been posted with the file name change -

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

I have read the document. It's straightforward and clear. I think it's ready to be published. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 09 September 2019 12:05 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

I support adoption of this draft (as co-author). The binding label provides a mechanism for interworking between separate MPLS switching domains, which is an important consideration as SR is rolled out. Extending PCEP with this capability is a logical and necessary step. Cheers Jon

Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheers Jon From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: 21 August 2019 04:40 To: Siva Sivabalan (msiva) ; cfils...@cisco.com; jefftant.i...@gmail.com; Jonathan Hardwick ; stef

Re: [Pce] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

Thanks Rakesh, sounds good to me. Jon From: Rakesh Gandhi Sent: 21 June 2019 18:30 To: Jonathan Hardwick Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; rtg-...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce

[Pce] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

Hi there I have reviewed this draft for the routing directorate as part of preparing it for IETF last call and IESG review. I was familiar with this document from the time that I chaired the PCE working group, but this was the first time I read it all the way through and paid attention to all

[Pce] Shepherd review of dratf-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-07

I have just completed a second shepherd review of this document. For reference, my first review can be found at the link below. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/kAw8SJX3uv5_gsW7Qa03Td0pBU4 I would like to pass a massive vote of thanks to the authors for reacting brilliantly to my

[Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-15.txt

-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday, 12 February, 2019 10:53 AM To: Wim Henderickx ; Siva Sivabalan ; Jonathan Hardwick ; Jonathan Hardwick ; Jeff Tantsura ; Clarence Filsfils Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-15.txt NOTE: Message is from an external sender A new

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin As I was preparing the next revision of this document, I realised I'd forgotten to reply to your email. (I thought I had replied, but I can find no evidence that I did so!) Anyway, I think we have converged. Please see my proposals below, and apologies for my tardiness. Cheers

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro I'm sorry that it has taken longer than I thought to reply to your comments! Please find our replies below. I will post an updated version of the document as soon as I can. Many thanks Jon -- DISCUSS:

Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

of what you'd expect, I think the definition is nevertheless clear as it is written. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric Sent: Monday, 7 January, 2019 9:37 AM To: Jeff Tantsura Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; Jonathan Hardwick ; Martin Vigoureux ; The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-segment-

Re: [Pce] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Warren - noted. I have been in conference with my co-authors regarding Alvaro's comments. We are close to having a complete reply. My apologies for the delay. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Warren Kumari Sent: Friday, 7 December, 2018 4:41 PM To: The IESG Cc:

Re: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

Spencer, I think it is as Adrian has described below (thanks Adrian). I will add the reference to RFC 8413. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel Sent: Thursday, 6 December, 2018 2:49 PM To: 'Spencer Dawkins' ; 'The IESG' Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Thanks for your comment - sorry for the delay in replying. > Section 8.4 strikes me as a little odd for an archival document -- presumably > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang either will or will not include the listed items, so > the recommendations will either be out-of-date or false once >

Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

Hi Martin Sorry for the delayed response. Please find replies to your comments below. Best regards Jon Could you elaborate on what you mean by: "or to perform a specific service on the packet." [Jon] I think it should say "specific function". Some examples of this can be found in

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin Sorry for the delayed response. Please find replies to your comments below. Best regards Jon Abstract This document specifies extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) that allow a stateful PCE to compute and initiate

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro Many thanks for these comments. I have read them, but need to have a discussion with my co-authors before I can answer them all. I hope to get back to you with a full reply early next week. Many thanks Jon -Original Message- From: Alvaro Retana Sent: Wednesday, 5

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

From: Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Saturday, 13 October, 2018 9:47 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 This is the start of a two week poll on making

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-07

This poll ended a week ago, with a pretty limited response. The chairs will discuss next steps with the authors. Cheers Jon From: Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Friday, 21 September, 2018 2:19 PM To: pce@ietf.org; draft-zhang-pce-resource-shar...@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-13.txt

AM To: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-13.txt Thanks Jon for this update. All my previous comments are handled. I was preparing the shepherd report, could you update these - (1) IDnits - https

[Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-13.txt

To: Wim Henderickx ; Siva Sivabalan ; Jonathan Hardwick ; Jonathan Hardwick ; Jeff Tantsura ; Clarence Filsfils Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-13.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-13.txt has been successfully submitted by Jon Hardwick

Re: [Pce] PCE segment routing extension

2:59 PM To: Marina Fizgeer Cc: pce@ietf.org; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) ; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) ; Jeff Tantsura ; wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com; Jonathan Hardwick ; Michael Gorokhovsky ; Alexander Vainshtein ; Alexander Ferdman ; ron.sday...@ecitele.com; Dhruv Dhody Subject: Re

[Pce] IPR check on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp

Dear authors of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp, Could you please send an email to the PCE mailing list saying whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp and, if so, if it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669

[Pce] WG last call for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-07

Hi all This message begins a 2-week WG last call for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-07. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/ Please read the document and reply to the PCE mailing list, indicating whether you believe this document is ready to be published or not

[Pce] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-08

Jonathan Hardwick has requested publication of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-08 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the PCE working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext/ ___ Pce mailing

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-07

Hi PCE WG! This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-07 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

Re: [Pce] PCE segment routing extension

[mailto:michael.gorokhov...@ecitele.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 5:33 PM To: Jonathan Hardwick ; Marina Fizgeer ; Dhruv Dhody Cc: pce@ietf.org; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) ; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) ; Jeff Tantsura ; wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com; Alexander Vainshtein ; Alexander

Re: [Pce] PCE segment routing extension

Jon From: Marina Fizgeer [mailto:marina.fizg...@ecitele.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 4:38 PM To: Jonathan Hardwick ; Dhruv Dhody Cc: pce@ietf.org; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) ; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) ; Jeff Tantsura ; wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com; Michael Gorokhovsky ; Alexander

Re: [Pce] PCE segment routing extension

Marina, Dhruv, Please see below. Cheers Jon From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 2:59 PM To: Marina Fizgeer Cc: pce@ietf.org; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) ; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) ; Jeff Tantsura ; wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com; Jonathan

Re: [Pce] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12

Thanks for the review, Dhruv! I'll think about your comments and get back to you SOON (possibly not until after my vacation next week). Cheers Jon From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 12:36 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12.txt

uot;MSD exceeds the default for the PCEP session"). Thanks Jon -Original Message- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:mustapha.aissa...@nokia.com] Sent: 29 June 2018 19:19 To: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-ro

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-11

Hi Cyril Many apologies for the delay – please see below. Cheers Jon From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cyril Margaria Sent: 30 January 2018 16:49 To: Dhruv Dhody Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-11 Hi, I have the

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-11

Hi Dhruv My apologies for the delay. Please find my replies and comments below. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 30 January 2018 09:20 To: Julien Meuric ; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for

[Pce] FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8233 (5389)

...@gmail.com; martin.vigour...@nokia.com; Jonathan Hardwick ; julien.meu...@orange.com Cc: dhruv.i...@gmail.com; pce@ietf.org; rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8233 (5389) The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8233, "Extensions to the Path Comput

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

Hi PCE WG! This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-10.txt

PCE WG - this version addresses the comments received from the IESG. Deborah - this version should be good to go to the RFC editor. Many thanks Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 04 May 2018 10:40 To:

Re: [Pce] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Warren, Ignas, Sorry for the slow reply. I think Deborah already explained our intent on the telechat. As this document does not actually define any new path setup types (just a mechanism to allow multiple path setup types) we can really only make generalized statements about the sorts of

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

last call. Authors - please could you ensure that these comments are addressed promptly. If any changes are required, you can include them in version -01 of the document. Many thanks Jon & Julien From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: 10 April 2018 1

Re: [Pce] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben Thanks for the comments - please see [Jon] below. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ben Campbell Sent: 03 April 2018 21:00 To: The IESG Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja Thanks - I agree with you and have corrected the text. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Mirja Kühlewind [mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net] Sent: 03 April 2018 16:06 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-t...@ietf.org; Julien Meuric ;

Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Martin Yes, we can assume that implementations will use RSVP-TE if they don't support this draft. I think the text you quoted has fallen into the mistake of using normative language to specify what is already written in RFC 5440. Alvaro picked up another instance of this. How about we

Re: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Spencer Thanks for your comments. Please see [Jon] below. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 April 2018 03:23 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-t...@ietf.org; Julien Meuric

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin Thanks for the comments - please see [Jon] below. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] Sent: 02 April 2018 19:20 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-t...@ietf.org; Julien Meuric ;

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

Thanks for the comments, Alvaro. Please see [Jon] below. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 April 2018 19:19 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-t...@ietf.org; Julien Meuric ;

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05

. Authors - please could you ensure that these comments are addressed promptly. If any changes are required, you can include them in version -01 of the document. Many thanks Jon From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: 27 March 2018 12:10 To: pce@ietf.org; draft

[Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09.txt

This version addresses comments received from the security, OPS and GENART directorates during IETF last call. Jon -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: 27 March 2018 13:43 To: Siva Sivabalan <ms...@cisco.com>; Jonathan Ha

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05

Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating

Re: [Pce] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08

[mailto:droma...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 March 2018 10:57 To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> Cc: ops-...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type@ietf.org Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08 On Fri,

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03

This poll has ended, with the result that this document will be adopted by the PCE working group. Authors, once the I-D submission tool has reopened, please resubmit the document as draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec-00. Best regards Jon and Julien From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw

Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08

Hi Roni Many thanks for the review. You are right, in this case we meant "IETF Review". I will update the document. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even@gmail.com] Sent: 26 February 2018 14:55 To: gen-...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08

Hi Dan Many thanks for the review. Please see my replies below - look for "Jon>". Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 February 2018 15:23 To: ops-...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 101

Hi Adrian Thanks for the suggestion and for the gentle reminder. I have just polled for adoption of this draft. Given this, it does not sound like you will need this slot, after all. Of course, if the poll throws up issues that must be discussed, or something else turns up, please feel free

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03

Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-11

Adrian Many thanks for your review. The authors will need to discuss your comments, and then we'll get back to you. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 18 January 2018 22:55 To: 'Julien Meuric'

Re: [Pce] IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 15 January 2018 09:41 To: draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing Dear

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08.txt

This version addresses Daniele's comments from the routing directorate review. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 16 January 2018 10:52 To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D

Re: [Pce] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07

Hi Daniele Many thanks for the review. Please see my replies below in … . Best regards Jon From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com] Sent: 10 January 2018 10:41 To: (rtg-...@ietf.org) Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org;

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07.txt

Hi All This version addresses the comments Julien made in his shepherd's review during the 2nd WGLC. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 19 December 2017 13:41 To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06

Hi Julien Many thanks for the speedy review! Please see a few answers below, marked with [Jon]. (All other comments are accepted.) I will hold the document mark-ups until WGLC ends. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 21

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06.txt

-routing. If you think the wording below can be improved for clarity, then please let me know! Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com] Sent: 20 November 2017 15:32 To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-11.txt

This new revision brings draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing in-line with the new LSP-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY TLV just published in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06. -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 20 November 2017 15:01

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06.txt

forwards with that? Best regards Jon From: Mahendra Singh Negi [mailto:mahendrasi...@huawei.com] Sent: 25 July 2017 13:12 To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meu...@orange.com>; Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhod

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

I'm OK with downgrading the "must" to a "may" (in lowercase). Cheers Jon From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: 19 November 2017 14:43 To: 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meu...@orange.com>; 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com>; Jonathan Hardwick <j

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity: relaxing constraint

Hi Stephane I’m not necessarily saying that this is the way to go, but I would like to point out the P flag and the I flag in the PCEP common object header. If a constraint can be relaxed, the PCC sends the relevant object(s) with P=0. If the PCE decides to relax a constraint, it includes

Re: [Pce] Clarifications on PST handling in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type & draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

@nokia.com] Sent: 17 November 2017 06:47 To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com>; Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; Julien Meuric <julien.meu...@orange.com>; stephane.litkow...@orange.com Cc: pce@ietf.org; 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> Subjec

Re: [Pce] Clarifications on PST handling in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type & draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

Hi Julien, see [Jon]s below... -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 16 November 2017 17:28 To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; stephane.litkow...@orange.com Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Clarifications on PST ha

Re: [Pce] Clarifications on PST handling in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type & draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: Clarifications on PST handling in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type & draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing Hi Jon, Thanks for your feedback. I see two possibilities here. 1. When the PATH-SETUP-TYPE is not present

Re: [Pce] Clarifications on PST handling in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type & draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

tup type for a PCUpd can be inferred from the current path setup type of the LSP (unless it is given explicitly), which is a change to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Thanks Jon From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sen

Re: [Pce] Clarifications on PST handling in draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type & draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

I think it should be acceptable for the PCUpd not to include the PATH-SETUP-TYPE, with the implication that there is no change to the path type. Although I'm not convinced it would be a good idea operationally, I don't think there's any need to prevent the path type changing on the PCUpd, if an

[Pce] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03

Jonathan Hardwick has requested publication of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the PCE working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

Hi Dhruv Thanks for this. Trimming to the open points: Introduction The second paragraph is superfluous - I suggest deleting: Further, in order to support use cases described in [RFC8051], [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce] specifies a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control

[Pce] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-pce-exp-codepoints

Hi there I am the document shepherd for this draft. Please find my review of the draft below. Many thanks for writing this draft. It looks in good shape overall. There are just a few clarifications I would like to make before we forward it to the IESG for publication. Cheers Jon Abstract

[Pce] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

Re-sending to the correct DL :) From: Jonathan Hardwick Sent: 12 November 2017 12:02 To: 'draft-ietf-pce-exp-codepoi...@ietf.org' <draft-ietf-pce-exp-codepoi...@ietf.org> Cc: 'pce@ietf.org' <pce@ietf.org>; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-pce-exp-co

[Pce] Working group last call (including final IPR check) for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

Dear PCE working group This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints/ Please read the document and reply to the PCE mailing list whether you believe this document is ready to be

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11.txt

This version addresses the feedback we received from the IESG. If anyone has any concerns with the changes, please shout ASAP. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 09 October 2017 08:27 To:

[Pce] Your IESG comments on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

Hi Alvaro Many thanks for your comments. I'm picking up this thread and replying as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I am very sorry for the delay. For some reason I can't find the original email with your comments in, so I have scraped the text from the

Re: [Pce] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric Many thanks for these comments. I'm picking up this thread and replying as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I am very sorry for the delay. Please see my proposed resolutions inline below, marked with "Jon>" Best regards Jon

Re: [Pce] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam Many thanks for these comments. I'm picking up this thread and replying as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I am very sorry for the delay. Please see my proposed resolutions inline below, marked with "Jon>" Best regards Jon

Re: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Spencer Many thanks for these comments. I'm picking up this thread and replying as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I am very sorry for the delay. Please see my proposed resolutions inline below, marked with "Jon>" Best regards Jon

Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-association-group

Dear PCE WG We have received a request from the authors of draft-ietf-pce-association-group for an early code point allocation. The process for early code point allocation is described in RFC 7120. The draft is required to meet several criteria, including: b. The format, semantics,

Re: [Pce] Best Wishes for the future of PCE WG !

com>; Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; Deborah A Brungard <db3...@att.com>; Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>; d.k...@lancaster.ac.uk; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> Subject: Best Wishes for the future of PCE WG ! Dear WG, Almost 12 yea

Re: [Pce] Can we make a non-backwards compatible change to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type?

not as ugly as RSVP-TE-NON-SUPPORT. Cheers Jon From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: 21 July 2017 19:55 To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-t...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ie

[Pce] Can we make a non-backwards compatible change to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type?

Dear PCE-ers I don't want to distract from the SDN topic too much, but we have an important decision to make about draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type. The shepherd review raised an issue that there is no way for a PCEP speaker to indicate that it can't (or won't) support RSVP-TE as a path setup

[Pce] PCEP as an SDN controller protocol?

Dear PCE WG The purpose of this email is to initiate a discussion about whether we want to extend PCEP to allow it to replace the functions that are traditionally provided by the routing and signalling protocols. Originally, PCEP was designed with the goal of providing a distributed path

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05

This poll for adoption has concluded, with the result that the document will be adopted by the PCE working group. Authors, please resubmit this version of the draft with the new name draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-00. Thanks Jon From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw

[Pce] PCE working group secretary

This email is to announce that Dan King is standing down as secretary to the PCE working group. The chairs would like to place on record our thanks and heartfelt gratitude to Dan for all of the work he did in this role. We look forward to Dan's involvement with PCE continuing long into the

[Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05

All, This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce

This poll for adoption has concluded, with the result that the document will be adopted by the PCE working group. Authors, please resubmit this version of the draft with the new name draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-00. Thanks Jon From: Jonathan Hardwick Sent: 01 June 2017 13:25 To: pce@ietf.org Cc

[Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce

All, This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce-03 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

Apologies for the delay. This poll has ended with the result that the document will be adopted by the working group. Authors, please resubmit this version of the draft as draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-00. Thanks Jon From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: 25

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-19.txt

This new version of the stateful PCE draft resolves the comments received during IETF last call. Thanks for your patience! Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 17 May 2017 15:47 To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE: inconsistency in "resource limit" text

Hi all Thanks for your feedback on this issue. I think we are probably in a position to close this issue down. To summarize: - The original intent was that the PCE MUST close the session. - It seems that nobody has implemented the "exiting resource limit exceeded state" notification. On the

[Pce] Stateful PCE: inconsistency in "resource limit" text

Hi PCE WG I've been tidying up the stateful PCE draft to prepare it for publication and I have discovered an inconsistency in how the stateful PCE is supposed to handle an overflow of its per-PCC resource limit. In section 5.6 it says: A PCE implementing a limit on the resources a single

[Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

All, This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18

make this clearer. Cheers Jon -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 11 April 2017 16:00 To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; Lionel Morand <lionel.mor...@orange.com>; ops-...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-

Re: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18

Hi Lionel Many thanks for a very thorough review. I'm picking up this thread and replying as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I apologise for the delay. Please see my proposed resolutions inline below, marked with "Jon>" Best regards Jon -Original Message-

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja Many thanks for your comment. I'm picking up this thread and replying as PCE working group chair, as the authors are unavailable. I apologise for the delay. It is possible for a PCC or a stateful PCE not to support updates and still to advertise the STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV.

  1   2   >