Thank you Fabrice, Doug and all.
Is it just magazine's pages (polygraphy) or real prints (from laboratory)?
If you can understand it from it's text of course...
Den
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Hi,
"Dans un superbe classeur anneaux, tous les tests des
objectifs PENTAX dj raliss par le Centre d'Essais
Chasseur d'Images. Vous pourrez ensuite complter votre
dossier, mesure que de nouveaux tests paratront, en
dcoupant les fiches complmentaires, dans l'dition
mensuelle de Chasseur
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:30:18 +0400, Denis Klimovich wrote:
What is it?
http://www.photim.com/Cmd4/Article.asp?R=FT-16
It looks like a little plastic (or maybe leather) "wallet" with the
Pentax logo to hold warranty documents.
TTYL, DougF
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Hi,
My favourite zooms were the SMC-M 24-35/3.5 and the SMC-A 70-210/4.
The shorter zoom was up there close to being my favourite lens, too.
The primes I liked best were the SMC-K 28/2, SMC-M 35/2, the SMC A*
85/1.4 and the SMC-A 400/5.6.
This does not necessarily mean that these provided the
"Denis" == Denis Klimovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Denis Thank you Fabrice, Doug and all. Is it just magazine's
Denis pages (polygraphy) or real prints (from laboratory)? If
Denis you can understand it from it's text of course... Den
Hi Denis. I have one of these "Dossier Test
LOL.
hey, I'd be happy to see you fellas anytime!
um, actually it was the idea *non*-pentax list members reading that
particular email on the archives that bothered me a bit. But what are
the odds of that happening, right? :-/
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
My most favourite Pentax lens must be the SMC 15/3.5.
After that come the A* 300/2.8 and A* 85/1.4 (which is still quite new to me).
I'm still thinking about getting the FA* 24/2.0 .. if I get manage to get
some details on how good it is wide open at infinity (astrophoto etc).
I will wait to see
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:53:26 +1000, Tanya Russell Mayer wrote:
What is your alltime favourite Pentax compatible lens? And why is it your
favourite?
I think someone (Albano ?) is collecting info on this ...
Anyway, my favorite is the SMX Pentax A* 200mm f4 macro ED
Why? Well I like macro
Hi Denis. I have one of these "Dossier Test Pentax". It's just
magazine's pages.
Regards.
Olivier.
---
Thank you Olivier.
Maybe it will be a good idea to start our own (supported by the penta
magazine?) project!?
I mean we have wide range of different lenses. Some lenses we can take for
test
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:04:43 -0800, Steve Larson wrote:
http://www.camera-direct.com/other.asp
I ordered my focus screen right over the phone. It has`nt come yet though.
I sent them an e-mail, they are out of stock now and expect to be able
to deliver again in may ...
(And I'll be ordereing
Mark Cassino wrote:
(Peter Smith wrote:)
... Has anyone else had this problem?
My Vivitar 70-210 won't fit on a Pz-1p if it is in macro mode.
Otherwise it fits fine.
...
My later version of this lens (2.8-4 var. aperture) works just fine with
my Z1-p.
Flavio
-
This message is from
Hi Michael, check for an archive named USER.ACL. In my version (Word 97) is
in the windows directory.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bromm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Peepl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, March 26, 2001 3:01 AM
Subject: OT: MS_Word
Anyone know what file Word
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:40:05 +0100, Peter Smith wrote:
User also says it's a zoom - isn't the picture that of a 28mm prime?
That it is
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Gotta be any of the 50mm f2.0 lenses that used to
ship standard with bodies.
Not fast, not the sharpest, but best bang for the buck.
Lon
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
NT that's for our equipment info
Philippe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
So what Pentax needs is for Mel Gibson to do their ads?
GGG
Collin
Original---
Well, this girl likes Pentax.
snip
it would have to be a relly nice package to convert me) :-)
Tanya.
***
Data Processing Consultation, Inc.
Providing Broad-Spectrum Business
John Mustarde wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:07:45 -0600 (CST), you wrote:
Well, there's no easy answer. Any of the big 4 companies have perfectly
fine "serious" cameras and it really comes down to personal preference
which system to get.
The trick is to avoid paying top dollar for a
Normal.dot
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Bromm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax Peepl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:00 AM
Subject: OT: MS_Word
Anyone know what file Word stores the auto-correct info in?
TIA
Mike
-
This message is from the
Tanya Russell Mayer wrote:
Well, this girl likes Pentax. And I won't even consider looking at any
other brands (unless they are compatible with Pentax, but even then it would
have to be a relly nice package to convert me)
You really shouldn't be looking at other people's
I would agree with John's assessment here. I use Ebay for my other hobby, amateur
radio, and what John describes is quite often the case there. Auctions in that arena
are often "won" and "lost" in the last 45 seconds with very little bidding activity
during the time the item was posted on
Hi,
be also careful with attaching such a lens on a LX !
Trying this, I marked the, just replaced, frame of the mirror box !
It seems that the protruding section is too big for the LX ( and the MZ7 ).
All my other bodies ( KX, K2, MX, ME Super, Super Program ) have no problems
with it.
Bernd
Could you elaborate on why the N80 and Canons are
crippled? The Elan 7
kind of looks nice, spec-wise. I like the quiet mode option.
Thanks to everyone who has chimed in on this, it's
much appreciated.
I'll let you know how she chooses...
One point I *may* make to her...if she goes
- Original Message -
From: "Gary L. Murphy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax Users Group" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 25, 2001 11:00 PM
Subject: eBay Funnies!
Check this out. Lister says, it's "New in box. NEVER
OWNED/NEVER USED"
He is also advertising a 28-80 and showing a 28.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still awaiting the final word on whether the
K-bodies have stepless shutters...
I have a disassembled K1000 on my work bench now. I'll
investigate and report back in a day or two.
Mark, have you had a chance to "figger"
My favorite Pentax lens is my Pentax 6x7 Super Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5/55mm
lens. Not only has it given me great results. but it commants respect. At a
crowed site recently, I was pushed aside and trod upon by other tourists who were
impatient at the time I was taking to set up and shoot
Dear Santa, please buy a lottery ticket for me.
At 10:18 PM 3/25/2001 +0200, you wrote:
Hi
Did you remember to buy a
lotteri ticket?
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På
vegne af Rapture
Sendt: 25. marts 2001 20:00
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Len Paris wrote:
Could you elaborate on why the N80 and Canons are crippled?
This is just my opinion, of course, but I consider the N80 to be
crippled because nothing older than AF-D lenses can be used on
it. I have some pretty nice AI-S glass that I'm awfully fond
of. A selfish reason?
Yup! It's plastic...same on the 77mm 1.8. This doesn't seem to be a prblem
though.
Darren S.
-Original Message-
From: David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: March 25, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: Japan Camera Show: 31mm f/1.8 Ltd
Is that green
They didn't want to make you angry, lest you hit them with it!
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Daniel J. Matyola" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My favorite Pentax lens is my Pentax 6x7 Super Multi-Coated Takumar
1:3.5/55mm
lens. Not only has it given me great results. but it commants
A new photographer will not care whether a camera uses the older lenses - if
and when she gets to that stage she will no doubt be purchasing another
camera anyway based on her experience with the first.
I would not call the camera "crippled" if that is the only reason.
Maris
- Original
well aware of "snipers", but NO bidding activity in
8 whole days? It sure
does make you wonder.
Tanya.
I think some of these things happen because lots of people only
look in on the auctions once a week, instead of constantly, and
then select the option to see the auctions that are
Zoom: The 75-150/f4 M.
Sharp, very versatile, compact, not overly heavy, nice feel to it. Great
daylight lens... Built in hood allows almost no flare ever. Easy to zoom and
focus with one touch. It's not a macro, but 150mm at 24" sure looks close
enough to it. (And it cost me $53!?)
Prime:
I've seen quite a few primes advertised as zooms - undoubtedly the focusing
helicoid confuses these "owners".
Steve S.
--
http://people.mn.mediaone.net/sscott2
Peter Smith wrote:
User also says it's a zoom - isn't the picture that
of a 28mm prime?
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From:
Yoshihiko Takinami wrote:
But still, many people prefer M50/1.4 to A50/1.4,
and many people prefer A50/1.4.
Very interesting, isn't it ? :^)
There are many different characteristics between similar lenses that
it's not hard to see why someone may prefer one lens to another.
There is,
Hi Bernd,
The Vivitar Series 1 35-85/2.8 will scratch the mirror frame too,
does`nt seem to hurt anything though. Some day I`ll grind that
protuberance off, it`s just a small portion of the corner that needs
to be removed.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From:
I guess this directed to those who do their own printing:
Are all enlarger lens mounts the same regarding size? Can one purchase any
lens and have it work on their enlarger without having to worry about
adapters? Or, for example, will a vivitar lens only work on a vivitar
enlarger?
Thanks for
My favorite zoom is my 75-150/f4 M. Good range for close-up work, and the
one touch manual focusing zoom action is very smooth.
But I'm wondering if sometimes it isn't a little too smooth, as every once
in a while the focal length moves by itself slightly, and I have to readjust
it. (If I don't
My favorite Pentax lens is my
James Apilado wrote:
I'll bite. My favorite lens is the SMC Takumar 35mm f2. It is always on my
ES II Pentax. sometimes I use it on my LX via the adapter. The lens has
replaced using my 50mm lenses.
For a zoom lens, I like my Tamron SP 35-80mm f2.8. With the
As Jan said, most lenses are standard 39mm thread mount.
If you get an oddball lens, you can probably use it by swapping out the
lensboard on your enlarger for the appropriate one.
tv
Delano Mireles wrote:
I guess this directed to those who do their own printing:
Are all enlarger lens
My brother the computer geek sent this to me, so I thought I
would pass it on as a passing interest thing. I suppose if you
have checked the box "always trust content from Microsoft" it
could cause some worry.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Jim" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "William
And I self-enabled another ebay LX body.
David
At 11:52 AM 3/26/2001 -0600, William Robb wrote:
I retired both my MX's from active duty. Neither one has a
working meter, one has a flakey film advance, the other, a bad
shutter. Perhaps at some point I will attempt to resurrect one
with parts
Someone should have programmed the list server to prevent the URL for the
31/1.8 Ltd. from reaching U.S. list members. Here in the States, the
Constitution forbids "cruel and unusual punishment.".
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: (703) 834-4648
-
This message is from the
Take wrote:
Who lost their MX and who got their LX?!
A member claimed the death of his two MXs ("they can't no longer be considered
cameras" or something like that.). Another member added one so:
114 -2+1 = 113
Regards
Albano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Thanks Bill, but I think I'm probably going to have to live with the
automatic focal length selector. At least on this lens. The M75-150/4 must
be quite different from the A70-210/4, as there's not a bit of rubber on the
M anywhere...
Skip
Skip wrote:
Every once in a while the focal length
- Original Message -
From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:34 AM
Subject: RE: Help with a favorite lens?
Skip wrote:
Every once in a while the focal length moves by itself slightly,
and I have to readjust it. (If I
Both of my girls (11 13) have really gone to town with ZX-10's. When My
Super Program was available, they didn't bite. I believe it is a
combination of weight, 28-80 zoom lens, autofocus and built in flash. They
don't care much for technical exposure at this point but really like
composition.
I would be very interested in your results. I just purchased a K 50/1.4 from an
Australian seller as well. I shot my first roll of film with it this weekend, and
while I'm very pleased with the results, I haven't attempted a comparison with another
lens. (I do have an M 50/1.7, and I may
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'm trying to find an article photographed by war correspondent
Dickey Chapelle. I believe the article is in the November, 1962
issue of Natl Geographic. If anyone on the list has this issue,
would you check to see if her article is in it? Thanks
At their age and interest I would get them a PS (Pentax of course)... Just
like the Crocodile Hunter advertises on the telly. Maybe even a digital.
Then when they outrow that they will be ready for the more technical stuff.
Follow the KISS principle...
Jerry in Houston
-Original
I've been looking for a cheap ~85mm lens. Does anyone has experience
with the Jupiter-9? It's 85mm f2, originally a copy of a Zeiss
design. The Leica SM version has good reviews.
I've seen this lens on M42 mount. Does anyone know if a K-mount
version exists?
The M42 version is going on ebay
tom wrote:
t Could you elaborate on why the N80 and Canons are crippled? The Elan 7
t kind of looks nice, spec-wise. I like the quiet mode option.
The Elan has no spot meter, that is forget slide film,
concerts/available light. F80 has that LCD overlapping the viewfinder
that makes me
- Original Message -
From: "Alin Flaider"
Subject: Re: Camera Recommendations
tom wrote:
t Could you elaborate on why the N80 and Canons are crippled?
The Elan 7
t kind of looks nice, spec-wise. I like the quiet mode
option.
The Elan has no spot meter, that is forget slide
Ralf wrote:
RE As far as the cameras are concerned, I would recommend the Pentax
RE MZ-5N/ZX-5N and the Nikon F/N65
Nice overall analysis if you only read the Pentax or Nikon parts.
Otherwise MZ-5N and N65 are only comparable in weight and the fact
they're both SLRs! N65 is truly the
I just got my Fisheye lens today. I got it from another place. My lens,
interestingly enough, came in a rather large Priority Mail box with
Priority Mail tape all over it... sent via UPS. H
Anyway, it's a rather well built lens. It seems to be made out of a high
grade plastic to
Gee, how did anyone ever use slide film or do concerts/available light
before spot meters came along Could there be another way
Jerry in Houston
-Original Message-
From: Alin Flaider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Talking about youngsters and photography, my little 3 and a half years old
niece, Charo, has already taken photos of her mom (my sister Albertina) with
mom's cheapo Kodak point and shoot. The composition is a bit funny, but mom is
in the photo.
Regards
Albano
-
This message is from the
Hi Bill
You might want to tell our fellow Pentaxians which part of the world you
live in; North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa,
Antarctis...Where ever
Thanks
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]P; vegne af Bill Visser
Cut/Paste the link above and read "Moo of Doom"
This is the last off-topic post I'll ever make. I promise.
Tom C.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Hi Juan,
I've been toying with one (M42 version) borrowed from a friend
(thanks Adi), and have done some available light shooting (wide-open)
as well as a couple comparative tests with similar focal lengths.
A nice lens - that is. Small, compact, well-built, with long throw
focus ring
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax Discuss" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 26, 2001 1:55 PM
Subject: OT: Cows in the News
http://www.msnbc.com/news/548777.asp?bt=mmmbtu=http://go.msn.co
m/MM/Main/N1.asp?target=http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/com
Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking for a cheap ~85mm lens. Does anyone has experience
with the Jupiter-9? It's 85mm f2, originally a copy of a Zeiss
design. The Leica SM version has good reviews.
I've seen this lens on M42 mount. Does anyone know if a K-mount
Almost - but not yet I'm wearing a cow suit... it stinks in here g
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Cows in the News
Here:
http://www.hamiltonsgallery.com/Don%20McCullin/
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
MZ-5n's spot meter covers 2.5%, at least according to Pentax Germany.
You can look at:
http://www.foto.pentax.de/produkte/produkt_daten/pro010004.lhtml
under "Belichtung" section.
Matjaz
Chris wrote:
The Elan 7 does have partial metering (though not "true" spot
metering). It covers
Jerry wrote:
Gee, how did anyone ever use slide film or do concerts/available light
before spot meters came along Could there be another way
They did but nowhere near the control over exposure you can get with a spot meter.
With a spot meter you can assign any part of the scene to
Delano,
Most enlarger lens boards are drilled for 39mm
threads, which is often cited as "leica" thread lens
boards. Almost all modern enlarger lenses, Nikor,
Schneider, Omega, Rodenstock, as well as most older
model enlarger lenses will work for 35mm negative
enlargement. My father, who was
Hi,
you just can't trust kine. A friend of mine was once coming to stay
for a few days and his train was delayed 4 hours because a cow fell on
it.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, March 26, 2001, 8:55:23 PM, you wrote:
Cut/Paste the link above and read "Moo of Doom"
This is
say Paul, wouldnt you australian seller be the same as 'mine'? Steve,
alias 'slimslim' on ebay?
He sounded decent enough and I'm hoping that the lens is like he said
('mint'... of course!). I'll know soon enough, and I'll post the
comparison results to the list. Dont hold any expectations of a
Yes, I know what they do It is just a tool...nothing moremaybe it is
just a crutch for those too lazy to learn the optics and physics involved
and perform the math.
-Original Message-
From: Pl Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hey I didn't know kine was a word! Neat. How does a cow fall on a train
though?
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Walkden" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "aimcompute" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Cows in the News
Tanya Russell Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is your alltime favourite Pentax compatible lens? And why is it your
favourite?
Nice question, difficult answer.
I have too many lenses, and too many of them are favourite in their own way.
I love my first Pentax lens, a KM 50/1.7 n. 6131...
I use heavier lenses like the Sears 80-200mm F4 and the A 35-105mm F3.5 on
my ZX-M without any problems at all. Plastic lens mounts seem to hold up
pretty well. I don't know how well they would handle really heavy lenses,
but with a really big lens I wouldn't try to hold up the weight with the
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, aimcompute wrote:
Hey I didn't know kine was a word! Neat. How does a cow fall on a train
though?
Heavily.
:)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
At 12:02 AM 3/27/01 +0900, you wrote:
Hi,
At 26 Mar 2001 12:18:50 +0800 (CST),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote;
I wish to know whether the M 50/1.4 has the same quality as A 50/1.4.
M50/1.4 is not optically identical to A50/1.4.
Pentax made some modifications when they introduced
A50/1.4. I think
My all time favorite lens is the A 50mm F1.4. It's a great little fast
lens. Call me a heretic but #2 is the Sears 135mm F2.8 Macro, followed
closely by the M 28mm F3.5.
Todd
At 12:53 PM 3/26/01 +1000, you wrote:
Ok, so this topic has probably been done to death, but seeing as I am new
Thanks Rob. I see it. I don't know if I deep down believe it, but I do see
it.
Stan
-
on 3/26/01 1:27 AM, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Mar 2001, at 23:09, Stan Halpin wrote:
on 3/25/01 10:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wish to know
You're right, same seller. The lens I received is somewhere between
excellent and mint. Glass is perfect. He mailed it BEFORE receiving my
payment. That's a new first, but I appreciate his trust. In my first
"test" frames I shot a finely detailed embroidered fabric wide open on
transparency film.
I was recommending the FA* 24mm because it is one stop faster and it's a
FA* lens. Maybe the 20mm is a better choice because 28mm lenses are pretty
easy to come by used for a song.
Todd
At 08:10 PM 3/26/01 -0600, you wrote:
1) FA 24/2.0 or FA 20/2.8 or FA 20-35/4 - Autofocus not mandatory
Daphne,
I was in the same boat, but I decided to keep them both, they each
have their own characteristics. I`m still in the process of testing them
both, but the A seems to have a little more punch to the colors and
good bokeh, the K seems a little sharper, especially wide open,
and great bokeh.
Interesting, Tanya and all. I responded off list, I thought. Tanya you
reaally do need to look at your Outlook preference settings . . .
stan
---
on 3/25/01 11:59 PM, Stan Halpin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 3/25/01 8:53 PM, Tanya Russell Mayer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Check out this bid history!
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1224434662
l8r,
Douglas E Harmon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/~genius91/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Thanks Gianfranco and Alin for the comments.
One more question, since I guess this lens doesn't exist in K mount:
Is it too much of a pain to stop down while shooting? I assume the
lens doesn't have the auto/manual position of Pentax SM lenses, right?
Thanks again,
j
--
Ok, here I go again. There is a file in c:\windows named USER.ACL. This file
contains all the items you want to correct.
HTH
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Bucky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, March 26, 2001 10:32 PM
Subject: RE: MS_Word
If anyone's interested, Pacific Rim Camera has Gerjan's _The Ultimate
Asahi Pentax Screw Mount Guide_ on eBay with a BIN price of $38, which is
their regular price and a few bucks cheaper than Amazon. It would be nice
if this went to a PDML member.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, John Mustarde wrote:
Comparing the specs, I see:
Elan 7: no AE lock
Just FYI, The Elan 7 has an AE lock.
Of course, the rest of the bells and whistles make them pretty good
cameras. Just not as full-featured as the big boys in the N and C
lineup.
Agreed. And as
I performed a global search on '*.acl'. Tis is the correct extension for
the 'auto-correct list' file. However, these files were not in the
C:\windows directory, they were in the C:\~\office directory and it wasn;t
called ?user?.acl. I suggest you perform a global search as above to
determine
I am so sorry peoples! I changed my Outlook Express Options back to
MIME/html as I was sending some pictures to a friend and I forgot to change
it back to "plain text" before posting all of my last responses!
Please forgive me for jamming up the entire last digest (#504) with all of
that
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1222679298
Todd
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Considering the "extras" included a Pentax SMC 24mm F2.8 ! Argh (still
kicking myself for not bidding while I had the chance...)
Todd
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Ramesh Kumar_C wrote:
Hi
I am planning to buy a Tripod. At present I do not have any big
glass. In future, I have plan of using 400mm lens.
Tripod should be stable enought to take such load and I usually go for
hiking; so should not be heavy.
My bugget is 150USD.
Actually I am
It could have a very simple explanation. Answer one question.
Does the bidding history show all of the proxy bids made by eBay
up to the bidder's max bid or does the bidding history just show
bids made by the bidder him/herself? I've not made an
exhaustive study of it but, if the proxy bids
Good try, and although not quite correct, it did put me on the right path -
the file is mso.acl. I think the difference is due to this being word 2000.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Corro
Sent: March 26, 2001 6:57 PM
To:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:49:32 +1000, Tanya Russell Mayer wrote:
Please forgive me for jamming up the entire last digest (#504) with all of
that rubbish!
No problem. Just purchase all members a MZ-S and all will be forgiven :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:00:37 -0600, Len Paris wrote:
Of course it could also be that bidder #2 is the seller under a
new ID, and he's just jacking the price up to make sure the item
doesn't go too cheaply. Setting a reserve would be a more
honest way of doing it, and carry no risk.
Yup. I had
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/kiska_09180007_1.html
A 16/2.8 Fisheye, TMAX 3200 in microphen
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
From: T Caleb Fauver
Subject: ZX-30 Questions In the archives someone refered to the ZX-30 as
crippled. What exactally does this mean? How is the camera crippled?
Does this refer to the fact that only certain lenses can be used with
this model?
Caleb, I bought my wife the ZX-50 (not yours,
Favorite prime: FA* 85mm F1.4. The combination of speed and reach let me
get photographs that would be difficult/impossible otherwise.
Favorite zoom: FA* 80-200 F2.8. Big, heavy, but all-around the most
productive recent purchase that I have made.
--Mark
-
This message is from the
You've got to admit: It sounds kind of like the "Xtreme Sports" version of
cow tipping ...
Mark Roberts scolded:
All right! No more "cow dropping" jokes!
"Treena Harp" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And with much splatter, depending on how fast the train's going. :-P
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:53:06 +1000, Tanya Russell Mayer wrote:
Oh, almost forgot, here's the link
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=111508
There's no pictures there. :-((
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Steve Scott opined:
I've seen quite a few primes advertised as zooms - undoubtedly the focusing
helicoid confuses these "owners".
Steve S.
I cringe whenever I read or hear any long lens, zoom or prime, call
"telescopic" insead of "telephoto". Although some semantic analysis reveals
that
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
