Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
The M75-150 is FS as the A100/2.8 covers it well and I really
need something a little longer, in the 300-500 range.
I still have that SMCK 400mm f5.6 available - when you
sell those two drop an email
Bill mailto://[EMAIL
On Jul 16, 2004, at 2:39 AM, Cotty wrote:
- Dave (hates camcorders and, by association, all who wield them)
Interesting. Why?
Before I put my foot in it any further I'd better point out that I'm
talking about those little video cameras that people buy at department
stores. I guess that I just
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:35:09 +0100, Nick Clark wrote:
Works fine so long as you want to copy a section of the original. I haven't yet
worked out a lens combination to give a full 35mm frame on the APS sized sensor
(magnification 0.67).
You also need to attach the adaptor ring to the camera
A couple of hours ago I wrote,
Bruce R. still lurks here as you've discovered, but we don't hear so much
Nikon uber alles as we once did.
Since, and without checking my mail to see if anyone actually has taken
offence, I realised that I had unintentionally alluded to a repugnant
ideology. I
The fountain of knowledge has failed me
miserably.
I have just been given an Olympus P400 dye sub printer, and have a
few questions
The colour coming off it is not quite right (no surprise), but the
profiling available in the driver seems rather
On 16/7/04, Anthony Farr, discombobulated, offered:
Cotty,
Did you happen to look at iagarengio's other auctions? Review his feedback?
Consider how long he's been an eBay member?
With over 32,000 quids worth of gear (as of now) all closing tomorrow, I
wonder where he will be after tomorrow.
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:38:22 +0200, Jens Bladt wrote:
Thanks a lot Nick and Leon.
I don't quite understand it all, mainly because I just ordered the *ist D,
but haven't got it yet. Isn't it possible to use normal TTL metering, i.e.
with a FA280T flash or a Pentax dedicated Metz flash?
There are
Here's an unsophisticated approach that I use to tame one of
my printers using third party inks:
I simply converted a photo to BW, then used
a curves layer to get the thing to print as neutral as possible.
I saved the curve, and load it in on any picture associated with
that printer and those
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:24:05 -0500, you wrote:
Kinda ugly, but plastic!
$225 buys a VERY nice ME Super, complete with CLA.
Or almost a CLA'd Super A, yeah, yeah, thats the ticket!
Don
Yeah, but you don't get that incredible rubberized 35-70/3.5-4.8 Macro
zoom, ya know...
Actually, the
On 16/7/04, John Mustarde, discombobulated, offered:
Actually, the best bargain in a film camera would be a used PZ1p for
around $300 - 400.
Crikey, are people still spending this much on a film camera?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I've been trying to figure out the meaning of the somewhat cryptic
instructions contained in the various Pentax bellows units and extension
tubes. Some of the instructions give me the impression that the focusing
rings of all lenses should be set at infinity when used with extension tubes
An excellent deal!
Yes, you can get a used Pentax body for about the same price, but this
is new!
Folks complain when they now have another choice for fitting those
K-mount lenses to?
Seems to me it's nothing but a good thing...
Whoever did the adv. copy did have a little problem figuring out
Thanks Lon. Thats probably as good an answer as I am going to get.
I was thinking along the same lines.
Did you make an action out of it?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re:
Here's an unsophisticated approach that I use to tame one of
my printers using third
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:30:53 -0500, you wrote:
Very happy. Can't wait to get out into the field in the next few days
and really test it out. Haven't got a 67mm UV filter on it yet, so it's
not going near the great outdoors yet. Don't tempt fate I always believe!
Do yourself a favor - buy some
cbwaters wrote:
Yeah, sounds dumb now but I was 16, broke, and on the way to my girlfriends'
house (her parents were seldom home)... kinda puts a little thing like a
smoke filled car in perspective doesn't it?
[smile...] Yup.
keith
Thanks, Leon
1 mm crop. That's actually very good and mostly acceptable, isn't it.
Would you say it's easier/faster than scanning the slide?
You need to remove
the K mount ring from the bellows, mount that on the camera then place
the camera and ring on the bellows. You have to do this with the
The 50's style works for me. Nice shot.
On 16/7/04, Simon King, discombobulated, offered:
Hi All,
Our second son Josh, just learning the head control to track and smile
at his 2 1/2 year old brother...
http://wwwstaff.murdoch.edu.au/~sking/josh/pages/bedsession01.htm
I was going for a 50's
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/7/04, John Mustarde, discombobulated, offered:
Actually, the best bargain in a film camera would be a used PZ1p for
around $300 - 400.
Crikey, are people still spending this much on a film camera?
I'm now working part-time at a camera store and I can tell
Kim Sherman posted:
Apologies if the list has seen this info already.
I just saw it on the LUG (Leica Users Group) and wanted to pass it along.
No financial interest in Rich Pinto's business, ya da ya da
---
Kobayashi goes K with the VSL43: revive those Pentax K lenses!
My SO is having a problem with Photoshop CS that she can't solve. I poked
around in there a little to try to solve it but after 20 yrs of dealing with
lousy software, hardware and bugs my frustration tolerance with computers is
so low that I had to quit.
Her problem is that after she makes her
You don't need an action. Convert one photo to BW that
has a lot of tonal range, make one curve, fiddling and printing
til you reach as neutral as you think you can get, save that
curve, and use it thereafter on every other photo.
Making the curve may require quite a few test prints, so
do a
Yeah, I 'm thinking about that too...
Cheers
Shaun
John Mustarde wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:30:53 -0500, you wrote:
Very happy. Can't wait to get out into the field in the next few days
and really test it out. Haven't got a 67mm UV filter on it yet, so it's
not going near the great outdoors
Joseph Tainter checked his mailbox everyday for four months for lenses that
never came then wrote:
I am frustrated beyond description about being unable to buy the lenses I
want. I need them soon. Why is Pentax doing this?
I am puzzled that few on the list seem to think this is something worth
Well used LXs seem to go for about that all the time on ebay, not to
mention many many other film bodies. The real money of course is in the
lenses, like it always has been.
A.
On 16 Jul 2004, at 14:52, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/7/04, John Mustarde,
My knowledge of German is limited to subtitles in old war movies, but it only looks
like what you wrote means something like Nikon rules all. I don't think that putting
that in German makes it offensive; although I do understand the inference. So no
offense taken, no apologies needed.
It
I have a new link:
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
This is with the new A50 2.8 macro.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone in Australia have a recommended/preferred insurer or method
of insurance for their camera gear?
Cheers
Shaun
John Mustarde wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:30:53 -0500, you wrote:
Very happy. Can't wait to get out into the field in the next few days
and really test it out. Haven't
Another: Pentax is doing fine as a company but is beginning to
de-emphasize their photo division, or at least moving to a leaner photo
division..
Possible explanations that come to mind:
demand has suddenly skyrocked and Pentax can't ship fast enough (yeah
right)
labor troubles, political
William Robb wrote:
The fountain of knowledge has failed me miserably.
I have just been given an Olympus P400 dye sub printer, and have a
few questions
The colour coming off it is not quite right (no surprise), but the
profiling available in the driver seems rather crude.
The fellow who
Or Pentax is about to bring out a whole new line of lenses and cameras
and is depleting current stock in the run up...
A.
On 16 Jul 2004, at 15:37, Tom Reese wrote:
Joseph Tainter checked his mailbox everyday for four months for lenses
that
never came then wrote:
I am frustrated beyond
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Tom Reese wrote:
demand has suddenly skyrocked and Pentax can't ship fast enough (yeah right)
I think this might actually be the case for some of the popular lenses.
I ordered my FA 35/2 in Feb or March and it showed up in April.
During that time everyone showed it as
I'm referring to road trip shooting, driving the back roads, stopping,
taking a short hike, shooting from the side of the road, or inside of a
nation/state park, etc. If I want to do something for a day or two,
I'll leave the gear in the hotel. Of course I would not leave expensive
gear in
The 50mm is a macro range I have never used, and this is a really nice
shot with it.
Cheers
Shaun
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I have a new link:
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
This is with the new A50 2.8 macro.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington,
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/brothers.JPG
My first attempt at fill flash and night skies.Just a bit of levels and a touch of the
fill flash plug in on the
sax players face in Elements and i think i got it ok.
Flash was at 45 degree
Thanks for understanding, Bruce.
As for Pentax Sucks, apparently a lot of Pentax diehards feel the same at
present. It might be all about the glass, but you gotta hang the glass on
something, after all.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My knowledge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Or, if you want a new basic plastic camera, somewhat less ugly, the Pentax ZX-M
is still on the market; BH lists it, with a zoom, for a little under that
$225. Same retro controls and, I believe, same top speed of 1/2000.
Guess they're depending on Pentax's
From: Tom Reese
Her problem is that after she makes her adjustments to the image and clicks
the print button Photoshop adds a strong purple cast to the image. This
cast
shows up in print preview as well as in the actual prints. She can save
the
image to disk with Photoshop and the image
On 16 Jul 2004 at 21:35, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Does anyone in Australia have a recommended/preferred insurer or method
of insurance for their camera gear?
In the past I have used AIS Insurance, they offer a specialist policy for
photographers. Contact George Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
Jens Bladt a écrit :
Thanks, Leon
1 mm crop. That's actually very good and mostly acceptable, isn't it.
Would you say it's easier/faster than scanning the slide?
You need to remove
the K mount ring from the bellows, mount that on the camera then place
the camera and ring on the bellows. You
Check the viewfinder specs before buying a ZX-M!
It's kinda dark, BUT, it's really small!
I can't see a thing through it.
Compared to a Super A it looks like you put a 50/1.4 on the SA and 28/4 on the M.
Even though you had a 50/2 on both!
If you do want one I'll sell mine cheap! I really can't
Alpa had their own bayonet mount. Late in the Alpa company's life they
bought a Chinon Mematron body, (I believe, but it could have been something
else), with a more Alpa like Prism housing and re-badged it with the
Alpa name. It used M42 mount lenses. The two other links were just
Japanese
On 16 Jul 2004 at 9:08, Tom Reese wrote:
Her problem is that after she makes her adjustments to the image and clicks the
print button Photoshop adds a strong purple cast to the image.
Go into color settings and select colour management off then see if the
problem remains. I suspect there has
On 16 Jul 2004 at 9:53, Mike Nosal wrote:
I don't understand the reason for this - Cosina's recent cameras have been about
filling a niche - affordable Leica screw and M-mount cameras, a modern M42
camera. But this is just plasticky, ugly and expensive for the features.
The only reasoning I
Actually his Nikon mania isn't what got to me, it was that he was
extremely insulting when
he wanted to be, and sometimes when he didn't. If you ignored this when
he was trying
he resorted to name calling, and expletives. Butch is just forgetting
how long he's been here.
I don't remember the
as stated, the said lens w/ case caps and in very good
condition and a 77mm UV filter for it.
Bill mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You may be joking but I think it is only a matter of time (years)
before Cosina or someone else does just that. Certainly a digital
k-mount body would sell really well I think, particularly as Pentax
themselves seem intent on either ignoring their own manual focus
k-mount clients, or treating
Since Cosina has been supplying K mount cameras to Vivitar for years
this comes as no surprise.
kim sherman wrote:
Apologies if the list has seen this info already.
I just saw it on the LUG (Leica Users Group) and wanted to pass it along.
No financial interest in Rich Pinto's business, ya da ya
Peter J. Alling a écrit :
Alpa had their own bayonet mount. Late in the Alpa company's life
they bought a Chinon Mematron body, (I believe, but it could have been
something
else), with a more Alpa like Prism housing and re-badged it with the
Alpa name. It used M42 mount lenses. The two other
Most excellent shot!
I've had little luck with this type of shot, I usually blow out the
subject!
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 4:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW:Waiting to go on.
What's interesting is that you can actually make out the hexagonal
pattern in the bokeh. BTW, these flowers are EVERYWHERE in Rockbridge
county right now.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/04 12:16PM
Hi!
SD I have a new link:
SD http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
Hey, this time it worked.
It looks
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
What's interesting is that you can actually make out the hexagonal
pattern in the bokeh. BTW, these flowers are EVERYWHERE in Rockbridge
county right now.
They are lilies and this is the time of year for them.
I shot this one on a hike two weeks
I am not receiving messages from the list.
If this gets through, I request that someone please reply to the list
with a cc to my email address to let me know.
Thanks, Dan
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Dave wrote:
...Flash was at 45 degree and a bounce card(the Cotty bouncy thingy)manual
and around 1/60 or so.
Nice shot Dave. Can you explain what the Cotty bouncy thingy is please?!?
tia,
tan.
Dave, don't you DARE!
Gotta remember, she's a young thing...or
On 16/7/04, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, offered:
I am not receiving messages from the list.
If this gets through, I request that someone please reply to the list
with a cc to my email address to let me know.
Reading you loud and clear Dan
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 16/7/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, offered:
Dave, don't you DARE!
Gotta remember, she's a young thing...or however that song goes...
She's not *that* young, so I guess that just makes her a thing.
Cheers,
Cotty oh boy am I gonna pay for that
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
It got through.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 2:10 AM
Subject: OT: Test
I am not receiving messages from the list.
If this gets through, I request that someone please reply
Dave,
I'd say you got it about right. The exposure on the subjects and the
night sky work well together. Nice job!
At first I thought I didn't like the bass player being so prominent,
but then after looking a bit more and hiding him behind my hand, I
think he adds to the scene - reinforces the
cbwaters wrote:
I agree.
Old Sound guy adage: All electronics are filled with smoke. If the smoke
gets out, it's going to be expensive to fix.
OTOH, My Mustang filled with smoke one day while I was driving over a
bridge... I pulled over and shut the car off expecting a
I am still not receiving messages from the list.
I sent a test message to the list, requesting replies to the list and to
my personal email address. I never saw my post or any relies to the
list, but two members were kind enough to reply to my email address,
saying that the saw my post, so I
A certain old, pommie bald guy wrote:
She's not *that* young, so I guess that just makes her a thing.
Cheers,
Cotty oh boy am I gonna pay for that
Oh, boy, will you ever! You wait 'til I see you on MSN Messenger next
time - I have *just* the smiley for you!
BUT, I'll be gentle with you,
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 15 Jul 2004 at 21:43, Norm Baugher wrote:
Exactly, if you're traveling by car, load up as much gear as you can,
then when you go out to shoot bag up just what you need.
If I do this I'm always concerned about the safety of what I have left back in
I saw an Alpa body, that took M42 mount lenses, at a swap meet a few years
ago. It looked like the Chinon Mematron. I owned a Mematron body because
it allow AE with pre-SMC Super Takumar lenses. The camera came out, I
believe, shortly after the ES Pentaxes were introduced. The AE on the
Chinon
On 16/7/04, John Mustarde, discombobulated, offered:
Actually, the best bargain in a film camera would be a used PZ1p for
around $300 - 400.
Crikey, are people still spending this much on a film camera?
Heck, a used MZ-S will set you back rather more than that.
Daniel,
It's possible that your ISP is treating PDML mail as spam, based on the
quantity of posts coming in, or that PDML is being relayed to you via an ISP
that is blacklisted by your ISP as a known souce of spam (that 2nd
suggestion is pure speculation).
Contact your ISP to find out if they
I'm referring to road trip shooting, driving the back roads, stopping,
taking a short hike, shooting from the side of the road, or inside of a
nation/state park, etc. If I want to do something for a day or two,
I'll leave the gear in the hotel. Of course I would not leave expensive
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/reportage/images/pic24.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On 17/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered:
A certain old, pommie bald guy wrote:
She's not *that* young, so I guess that just makes her a thing.
Cheers,
Cotty oh boy am I gonna pay for that
Oh, boy, will you ever! You wait 'til I see you on MSN Messenger next
time - I
Nice shots. We have some this color too, but more of the deep orange
ones.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/04 11:55AM
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Steve Desjardins
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2531829size=lg
DagT
Of course, given our recent discussions, his ISP may be right.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/04 12:59PM
Daniel,
It's possible that your ISP is treating PDML mail as spam, based on
the
quantity of posts coming in, or that PDML is being relayed to you via
an ISP
that is blacklisted by your ISP as a
OMG - you are so bad! lol.
t.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 17 July 2004 3:21 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Waiting to go on.
On 17/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered:
A certain old, pommie bald guy wrote:
She's not
Hi,
Friday, July 16, 2004, 12:51:58 PM, Anthony wrote:
A couple of hours ago I wrote,
Bruce R. still lurks here as you've discovered, but we don't hear so much
Nikon uber alles as we once did.
Since, and without checking my mail to see if anyone actually has taken
offence, I realised
I had a lot of friends who's cars frequently filled up with smoke. I
think they knew why, but could never seem to remember.
Norm
John Francis wrote:
You're kidding!
Inside the car? And you never pursued the source?
I was astonished by that, too.
If something I entrusted my life to on a
Hi,
someone called Nico sent me this message. He has some Pentax stuff
for sale. If you're interested in it, please contact him on the email
address below. Please do NOT contact me.
Regards,
Bob
This is a forwarded message
From: Susanna Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Hi,
Oddly enough, I'll generally leave my gear in the trunk of my car in the
hotel car park rather than leave it in the hotel room. If I'm staying
at an expensive hotel, of course, I'll check the bag with the concierge.
But there's more theft from hotel rooms than from just about anywhere
I know that this has been discussed before but I was hoping someone can tell
me if there is a shareware (free) program to recover images that have been
accidentally deleted. I have three on a compactflash card that I need to
recover. The card has not been written to since I deleted the images and
You posted it on the Pentax Deranged Mailing List
BR
From: Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How on earth did my very mild observation about BR, and subsequent apology
for a careless allusion, warp into another insultfest.
I've had luck with:
http://www.z-a-recovery.com/digital_image_recovery.htm
However my circumstances were different. I pulled the CF card out of the reader
before stopping the device. The card shoed full in the camera but i could not see
any images. I did not delete the images. The other
I also know how to trim my responses.
BR
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at least Bruce
has the ability to stay on topic. (Now that was an insult).
Charles,
The one I use is not free, but inexpensive. It has paid for itself
many times over and found stuff on written to cards that had been used
many times. It uses several different methods for recovery.
http://www.datarescue.com/photorescue/
HTH,
Bruce
Friday, July 16, 2004, 11:01:34
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first attempt at fill flash and night skies.Just a bit of levels and a touch of
the
fill flash plug in on the
sax players face in Elements and i think i got it ok.
Flash was at 45 degree and a bounce card(the Cotty bouncy
Cool. A close diagnol crop making the pollen things (are they called
stamens or something) pointing straight down would be a even better shot
IMHO.
rg
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I have a new link:
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
This is with the new A50 2.8 macro.
Steven Desjardins
Department
Collin wrote:
It's been stated that they have large back-orders on istD bodies.
If true it may likely be the same scenario for the lenses.
No, not dying.
Just unable to adjust to the volume of growth that's coming with popular
new products.
They may need an influx of cash in order to manage the
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:52:46 -0400
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Pentax body from Cosina
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
As I search unsuccessfully for some used K-mount gear I find myself
wondering if there's a market for vintage re-issue lenses, the way
Fender Guitars put out 1957 and 1962 replica models when they
discovered that everybody preferred older guitars to the current models.
Presumably Japan is being
Don said:
Check the viewfinder specs before buying a ZX-M!
It's kinda dark, BUT, it's really small!
I can't see a thing through it.
Compared to a Super A it looks like you put a 50/1.4 on the SA and 28/4 on
the M.
Even though you had a 50/2 on both!
If you do want one I'll sell mine
Hi gang,
FOR SALE:
Fuji GA645zi:
Autofocus (with manual override), zoom 55-90, black
titanium body, motorized advance, data imprinting,
easy loading system and a large list of pluses. A
lovely compact and light pro medium format camera.
A couple of reviews:
anybody know what a K105/2.8 in near mint condition is going for lately?
I couldn't find any data at ebay. Must be rare.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: '57
I'll second that!!! MZ-M is the only camera I must use a 2X magnifier to
focus accurately. It is a fine camera otherwise. A pity.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Check the viewfinder specs before buying a ZX-M!
It's kinda dark, BUT, it's really small!
I can't see a thing through it.
Well I thought if they made their TM in K mount (not even KA) I would snap
one happily.
http://www.cosina.co.jp/tm-silver/index.html
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Like this:
http://www.photovillage.com/html/vsl43.html
_
3. Pentax is scaling back. They will produce new lenses, like the DAs, at a
steady pace, but will not produce enough to meet sudden surges in demand.
(Foolish, if you ask me, since the demand is now. If not met now, the
demand may not exist when production becomes adequate.)
Some news from
there are probably other equally plausible explanations. I share your
frustration.
Maybe they have been in the process of replacing the FA lenses?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the MSN Premium and get 2
På 16. jul. 2004 kl. 22.48 skrev Alan Chan:
there are probably other equally plausible explanations. I share your
frustration.
Maybe they have been in the process of replacing the FA lenses?
That would be nice, a set of DA prime lenses with the Quick shift focus
and the 14mm build.
Let´s face
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Alan Chan wrote:
there are probably other equally plausible explanations. I share your
frustration.
Maybe they have been in the process of replacing the FA lenses?
Pentax usually isn't full of surprises. We heard about the DA lenses
4-6 months before they were released,
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:20:20 +0200, Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
You don't need to make hole in the mount, just put a piece off Scotch:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/pentax/multizone.htm
(French, translate by babelfish)
Download a gauge for hole or insolators:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:35:44 +0800, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Does anyone in Australia have a recommended/preferred insurer or method
of insurance for their camera gear?
Shaun,
My household insurance - which is only available through brokers and is
called Gold Star - is very good. A bit on the
Hi I am looking for a 4p remote cord Pentax LX motor drive to IR
remote any luck
Thanks JD
- Original Message -
From: William Robb
Subject: Re: optimal lens performance with extension
What about when lenses are reversed? Should macro lenses be set
at
infinity
or at the closest focusing position?
Bill the dumbass said
Closest. Look at what happens when you focus a
That's quick thinking but I think you y'all might be funnin' me.
Don (Born at night, but..)
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K105/2.8
- Original Message -
From: Don
Thanks Rob, I'll email him Monday for a quote.
Cheers
Shaun
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 16 Jul 2004 at 21:35, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Does anyone in Australia have a recommended/preferred insurer or method
of insurance for their camera gear?
In the past I have used AIS Insurance, they offer a
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
