http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007
Shel
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote on 22.03.06 3:01:
The DS viewfinder is a little larger and a bit brighter, which makes
it easier to use manual focus.
Godfrey, it is viewfinder in Dl that is noticeably brighter than the one in
Ds - mainly thanks to new matte screen called Natural Bright Matte II. I
think
I did not say negative. Pessimistic is not necessarily negative ;-).
You got me there, what about a positive pessimistic kinda guy?
Somehow I am thinking about:
positive ~= slide
pessimistic ~= peso-mistic
Anyway - the deal is closed. Now I am positive pessimist.
--
Boris
Dag,
I think I'd prefer the 77, but on the other hand: An *ist D with 21mm, 40mm
and 70mm would make a very compact travelling set.
*istD with Sigma 18/3.5 (definitely bigger than 31 mm), 43 mm and 77
mm all fit into very small bag that I took with me to London... The
only advantage I can
From: Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/21 Tue PM 09:15:41 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: crop factor vs. telephoto factor
I mostly lurk here, however I do have a question that I have had
answered is two different ways, and always by someone who knows more
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/21 Tue PM 09:52:49 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: CRASH! Always Wear Your Seat Belt ...
what? a discussion of car chases with no mention of Bullitt?
for shame
Or French Connection?
Bullitt was state of the art
Hey little 70, show me your mount... just to check something ... ;)
On 3/22/06, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200615-02.jpg
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I remember (but could be wrong) that the difference is like 1/3 EV or something.
Well, you won't see any difference really ...
On 3/22/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday I recieved a FI-40 grid screen. It is a screen for the SFX, but
as expected it fits nicely in a
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cricket's among the very few sports that I have no clue about.
Here you go:
http://www.therulesofcricket.co.uk/
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/hosking/cricket/explanation.htm
Slightly less dry:
http://www.allworldknowledge.com/cricket/index.html
LOL
Dave
On 3/22/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you suck.
Very intersting (although no Pentax camera tested):
The microdrive is way faster when formating with 32K clusters instead
of 4K clusters.
I will check mine ASAP and report.
On 3/22/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007
Shel
Interesting. Thanks !
On 3/22/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.cypress.com/portal/server.pt?space=CommunityPagecontrol=SetCommu
nityCommunityID=208PageID=218DirectoryID=717110
http://tinyurl.com/jdr9x
Ken
--
--
Thibouille
--
K.Takeshita wrote on 22.03.06 3:30:
http://www.cypress.com/portal/server.pt?space=CommunityPagecontrol=SetCommu
nityCommunityID=208PageID=218DirectoryID=717110
Is it possible then that new, 10 MPix sensor in D2 would come from
Cypress???
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
ROTFLMAO
That concise description sums up the game perfectly. :-)
Dave
On 3/22/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally:
The Rules of Cricket as Explained to a foreign visitor.
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in.
Each man that's in the side that's in, goes out,
G'day Brian,
Not a bad shot considering the lens the lighting conditions.
IMO the Johnny Walker billboard adds to it. I also like the little bit
of motion as well.
Dave
On 3/22/06, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who and his what?
A small percentage of PDMLers will know
One has to choose between viewfinder and other features.
Viewfinder, is what you use all the time, even if you have no film, or
SD card is full...
You can think about Nikon D70 as a BMW car with wooden chair.
DS - as a BMW car with normal, comfortable seat.
Pentax 645 - it looks like a
Ken didn't mean flat as in lacking contrast. He meant that he finds
that analog prints have more of a three dimensional look. I don't see
that, but he may well have a more discriminating eye.
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I've got to agree. When I have flat images, it's
Very nice Mark.
Dave
On 3/22/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a larger (400 x 1300) version of the photo I shot for the
Pentaxians project on March 19.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pghpano2.jpg
5 images stitched and cropped.
ist-D, 31mm Limited, ISO 200, 1/250 sec, f/5
I'm selling 2 mobiles that I'm not using anymore, if anyone is interested:
- Nokia with camera (4.1 mega pixels)
- Nokia with camera and vibrating alert
Have a look at the pics and let me know if you're keen:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/pic241643sa.jpg
Cheers,
Dave
G'day All,
I also shot a panorama sequence for the PWP. I didn't end up posting
it because when downsized to 800 pixels you couldn't see much. That
and the fact that it's really not that interesting a scene IMO. (How's
that for a sales pitch? :-)
I haven't posted any pictures in a while, and
Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
On 3/21/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was out west the winter of '96 when Victoria,BV got 64cm in 24 hours.
Victoria, BC doesn't own a snowplow. They normally don't get snow, and
if they do, it's maybe a centimeter or two.
Osoyoos, where I was
On Mar 21, 2006, at 11:54 PM, William Robb wrote:
I realize that this is like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a
dog.
This brand of kitty litter is far and away the best-tasting.
-Aaron
Correction:
On 3/22/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm selling 2 mobiles that I'm not using anymore, if anyone is interested:
- Nokia with camera (4.1 mega pixels)
- Motorola (not Nokia) with camera and vibrating alert
Have a look at the pics and let me know if you're keen:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 3:25 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Godfrey, it is viewfinder in Dl that is noticeably brighter than the
one in
Ds - mainly thanks to new matte screen called Natural Bright Matte II.
I
think Dario can confirm my observation especially that he had these two
cameras at the
On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If you grew up with Rollei TLRs and Hasselblad SLRs, you'd think your
35mm camera was like looking down a dark tunnel.
Going from the 67 to something like the ME Super or the LX, I always
took a little while to adjust to how tiny the
I'm not Frank, but here's how I do it.
The Nikon F3 gets picked for low-light and BW work. It's usually got
Tri-X in it, rated from 200-6400 depending on how I'm shooting that day.
The combination of fast film and 1/2000 top shutter means that on sunny
days it doesn't get picked, but the WL
It was no different when I picked up an LX after months of using only a
Leica M3 ... looking through that dark, narrow tunnel took quite some
getting used to.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Aaron Reynolds
On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If you grew up with Rollei
All four shots are beautiful. The Lonesome Pine and Ass Hill are more than
beautiful, they make me feel.
The Ass Hill is from the same spot as the lonely horse you presented
earlier, isn't it?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large
Hi Bruce
I see that I did myself a favour by not looking at anything newer than the
SFX series from Pentax :-)
I don't use Autofocus as well and I hate loud cameras too ;-)
The SFXn and the ME Super and now the Spotmatic F are my main cameras.
I saw darker viewfinders before with old SLR cameras
On Mar 21, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
The perceived change is caused by YOU, changing your position to keep
roughly the same subject in view :-)
Perspective depends on STANDPOINT only.
On that given standpoint, the lens-focal length, and the size of
the image-area (film or sensor)
Bigger is better! Nice details. Regards, Bob S.
On 3/21/06, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I saved a couple of images that people liked in bigger versions. These are
still 1/3 the size of the originals, but they look pretty good on my
1280x1024 monitor.
The plethora of panoramas posted here in recent weeks is interesting from a
technical standpoint, but for the most part they are boring and
uninteresting photos - at best a documentary of some space that looks good
spread out over a wide number of pixels. I've seen nothing original,
nothing
Lovely. The larger image is much better for seeing the finer details.
Dave
On 3/22/06, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I saved a couple of images that people liked in bigger versions. These are
still 1/3 the size of the originals, but they look pretty good on my
1280x1024
Hi Aaron
I have never used a mid format camera but of course would love to try/get
one like the lovely Pentaxes.
Can you tell me:
How easy is it to get roll film nowadays and what are the cost of film and
development?
I live in Switzerland and have not checked prices yet but see the cameras
Thanks Adam for the nice report, it makes sense for me ;-)
I would like a fast 35mm too but would gladly take a manual version as
well...
Does Tri-X need any special development when used at such high ISO numbers
as 6400, I have never used it
but would like to try it for indoor people shots
Hope you didn't freeze your cojones off while making the photos.
The gallery as it is is a bit overwhelming, and, for a final product, could
stand to be edited to eliminate some of the weaker shots and the near
duplicates. Still, it's a bit like looking at your contact sheets, and
you've
I don't know much, but will say that a new 19 inch flat LCD monitor at
work has impressed me. The richness of the blacks has gone a long way
to improve the 3-D rendering of images on the screen. Is it the 700:1
contrast ratio?
Regards, Bob S.
On 3/22/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus,
Any 35mm in K mount would be nice, but an f2 would suit my shooting
style best. The FA is what I want because of how good the lens is, but I
don't own any AF cameras at the moment (And am not likely to add a
Pentax AF body, unless it's another DSLR).
You need to extend development
On 3/22/06 6:13 AM, Paul Stenquist, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken didn't mean flat as in lacking contrast. He meant that he finds
that analog prints have more of a three dimensional look. I don't see
that, but he may well have a more discriminating eye.
On Mar 22, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Bruce
I finally finished up the stuff from the '40's Shoot' I did at the end
of January with the Canon I dumped a few weeks ago.
Here's the last 2 shots, and IMHO the best of them.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/111010892/
I cut her toes off on this, which is unfortunate.
And:
Sorry to bore you Shel :-)
Here's a whole bunch of something in my house (Quicktime spherical
panorama ~2.7M):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/VAPHT_006_3.mov
I have no pretensions that I am creating an original artwork. At
present I mainly do these things to show the family overseas what
William Robb wrote:
No problem.
I actually like Outlook Express.
Am I still your friend after admitting this?
William Robb
Sure. Everybody has faults.
On 3/22/06 4:08 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.cypress.com/portal/server.pt?space=CommunityPagecontrol=SetCommu
nityCommunityID=208PageID=218DirectoryID=717110
Is it possible then that new, 10 MPix sensor in D2 would come from
Cypress???
Well, that idea crossed
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pghpano2.jpg
Very nice, Mark! Wish I had the patience to do panoramas.
I'll take this opportunity to thank everyone for their feedback and
respond to various questions.
WRT the Pentax World
William Robb wrote:
The Pentax finders are actually pretty good compared to the competition.
I realize that this is like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a dog.
grin
Doug Brewer wrote:
Thanks, Bill. I was afraid I was going to have to d/l OE and have a
look.
shudder
Never said there was anything wrong with such photos, just that they have
been done time and time again, and that something different, perhaps
outside the realm of more normal or common panorama subjects (or even more
common subjects treated differently) might make for an interesting
challenge -
Hi Adam
somehow I prefer Krista 056 , ist bright and funny.
Krista 57 is to dark for me and I don't like the arrangement.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:09 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO's -
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote on 22.03.06 3:01:
The DS viewfinder is a little larger and a bit brighter, which makes
it easier to use manual focus.
Godfrey, it is viewfinder in Dl that is noticeably brighter than the one
in
Ds - mainly thanks to new matte screen called
Big is better, yes. There is much to like with the Trinity image. But the
composition makes it wow, next picture please. How about making it more
off centre (read interesting) by using portrait format putting the door in
bottom of the frame?
Just a thought, from a person who haven't been on the
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see your point, but what's wrong with photos that just document a
scene? Thanks to Marks, recent shot (as an example) I now know what
Pittsburgh looks like. And I find that kind of thing interesting.
Mark does make Pittsburgh look good.
Now if the
More to the point of my question, actually -- is there any way I can
find out which focusing screen ships with the DS2 by examining my DS2?
And is there any way to determine whether or not the eyepiece is
multi-coated?
-Aaron
Markus, my experiences are all out of the ordinary because up until May
I owned and operated my own lab. 120 format film is harder to find but
still readily available -- you might simply need to call the local
distributor and have them recommend a store to shop from.
Contact sheets are
Ca$415+tax+shipping from http://www.cameracanada.com/; is marked not
currently in stock but if you have the money and patience they will
kindly backorder that for you...
On 3/22/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not Frank, but here's how I do it.
The Nikon F3 gets picked for
Still this pancake options are nice to have, I mean, there's always a
trade off between speed and size, but these lenses are certainly
distinctive in the DSLR world, right?
The DA40 is too tight for the type of shooting that I do, but the
DA21... I'd just buy it to see the look in my boss face
On 3/22/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not Frank, but here's how I do it.
Thank God i'm not Frank either.VBG
If its horse related, i use the F90X or the D1 or the D2H. There are
more suited for the job.
If its low light, i use the Nikons more as i have more glass at F2.8
than i
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: mid format cameras - running cost? was:RE: DS vs DL viewfinder?
Many one-hour style labs are capable of processing 120 film, however that
does not mean that the operators of the lab know how to do it or are any
good at it.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: It's huge, but I don't want one
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200615-02.jpg
A lens with a field of view equivalent to a 105? I could find a use for
that.
Which means I probably will.
William Robb
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, here's a panorama challenge: make something different
Night panoramas taken with rotary cameras offer an interesting aspect in
that, unlike most other photography, they capture rather long time
spans. Let me explain:
Due to its working principle, a
On Mar 22, 2006, at 9:48 AM, William Robb wrote:
While many 1hr labs can process 120 C-41 (I think all Noritsu film
processors can do it), very few will have the needed masks and lenses
to print it.
True. Though a lot of places that do have the masks and lenses still
don't know what to do
Scanner capable of 120 film is a must.
It can be Epson flatbed, or whatever.
Depending on print size - you can choose scanner.
Dedicated roll film scanner is better, but costs a lot.
Roll film costs less than 35mm film.
At least slide film, like Velvia/Provia/Astia.
Reala/NPS/NPH are similar
Again, how three dimensional a print looks is entirely the result
of how it is rendered. It makes absolutely no difference whether the
capture and rendering process was film or digital.
Godfrey
On Mar 22, 2006, at 3:13 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Ken didn't mean flat as in lacking contrast.
Ken,
I'm not accusing you of being anti-digital.
A television screen, any television screen, renders a photograph
differently compared to a print. A CRT renders differently from an
LCD. Etc. Rendering for the given target is the key to a quality
viewing experience.
Godfre
On 3/22/06 9:50 AM, William Robb, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200615-02.jpg
A lens with a field of view equivalent to a 105? I could find a use for
that.
Which means I probably will.
Noticed this has 49mm filter ring.
If anyone who has a
I think the DS does not have wireless sync with the
AF360FGZ. I have a D and recently was very tempted to
get a DS as a second body because of the low price,
but after I calmed down, I told myself that I should
either save that money for a wide zoom (Pentax 12-24mm
or Sigma 10-20mm) or for the
Christian wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Thanks! I have 11 magazine covers now. I think that's all of them.
Anyone want to see 'em all on a web page?
YES! Please!
http://www.robertstech.com/pdmlmags.htm
I need some help to identify both the magazine cover designers and the
original image
Sylwek,
The DL finder is slightly brighter than the DS finder at the expense
of some magnification. The new screen is designed to enhanced
brightness but I find it doesn't have quite the same focusing tooth
to my eye. That is, I find the DS finder allows me to focus a 20-35/4
and 50/1.4
I really just need the ring. The glass is of no consequence - the worse it
is the better - even broken will do. The ring must be in good condition.
Please reply off list. Thanks!
Shel
On Mar 22, 2006, at 6:07 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
More to the point of my question, actually -- is there any way I
can find out which focusing screen ships with the DS2 by examining
my DS2? And is there any way to determine whether or not the
eyepiece is multi-coated?
The DS2 uses the
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
More to the point of my question, actually -- is there any way I can find
out which focusing screen ships with the DS2 by examining my DS2?
I think it should be the same as the one in the DS. However, apart from the
11-segment AF frames, I cannot tell a way to spot the
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: mid format cameras - running cost? was:RE: DS vs DL viewfinder?
When I was in Prague, I needed to find a lab to process my film before I
returned home, since I was shooting ISO 800 and had to go through Heathrow
both ways,
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Which tele lens for poor mans bird photography
http://www.robertstech.com/pdmlmags.htm
I need some help to identify both the magazine cover designers and the
original image photographers.
Fun project.
I supplied
If I want to use a waist level finder, I grab the Sony R1. if I want
to do anything else, I grab the Pentax DS and whatever lens whim
moves me for. I usually prefer the Pentax for scenes in lower light
and/or requiring faster responsiveness. The Sony is quite convenient
for candids and
Don't want to start a whole Thing, but I wish to express the hope that
all our friends Down Under are okay after the horrible recent weather.
2006/3/22, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, here's a panorama challenge: make something different, maybe a macro
panorama, or one of some everyday object like a sofa or a car, or of
something in your house.
I like your challenge very much, Shel, and be sure I'll try to devote
the sparse
B+W makes 49mm filters and has the best coating I've seen on filters:
they call it MRC. I use filters so infrequently these days that I buy
only B+W filters, unless a specific filter available from another
manufacturer is uniquely suitable for a task (like the Hoya R72).
Godfrey
Studio Lighting was done by Valentin using a picture of mine (same used for
Blur).
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: PDML magazines (was: Which tele lens for poor
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/22 Wed PM 03:12:04 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: mid format cameras - running cost? was:RE: DS vs DL viewfinder?
On Mar 22, 2006, at 9:48 AM, William Robb wrote:
While many 1hr labs can process 120 C-41 (I think
And you missed the purist variation: grainy and all BW.
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/blurbw.jpg
Also spot a different feature ;-)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: PDML
Tim,
There have been two opinions on this shot. The first is shared by you
and a number of others--too symmetric, too centered, etc. I agree that
the center position of the door breaks the classic rules that address
off-center subjects, placing points of interest at power points in
the
Blur is by me, both main cover picture and cover design. I cannot remember
the author of Frank's pic.
Dario
Sorry for the OT, but i receieved an email from the General Manager of
the proposed Radio Station for Stouffville and the application to the
CRTC(FCC for those in the USA)has been sent in.
If it is successfull we'll be on 102.7 FM with 50 Watts of pure power
at out sides.:-)
I know most don't
Hi
I have 4 cameras, a Leica, an LX, a Z1p and my new *istDS. I shoot a lot of
club activity and for that I use the Leica with Ilford 3200
film, I also have taken along my LX with Fuji Press 800 film. I usually shoot a
roll of each during a set.
Most recently I have been experimenting with
Thanks to all those who commented on the shots. The feedback is
appreciated.
Yes, Ass Hill is at the same location as the earlier Lonely Ass photo.
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: GESO - Late to Work
The DS allows wireless control of the AF360FGZ but not with the built-
in flash ... it takes two of the FGZ flash units to do the
communications. The D's builtin flash can control the FGZ.
I'd forgotten about this as I use flash so infrequently. When I use
flash, I use a Sunpak 383, which
Blur is by me, both main cover picture and cover design. I cannot remember
the author of Frank's pic.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Which tele lens for poor mans bird
Easy:
*ist D - everyday shots, pictures for e-mail, grab shots
MX - BW
LX - Colour slides
67 - Resulting from a picture taken by any of the above that would
benefit from more time and a bigger format.
Malcolm
Dario did the Blur cover IIRC.
Dave
On 3/22/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Thanks! I have 11 magazine covers now. I think that's all of them.
Anyone want to see 'em all on a web page?
YES! Please!
When I was shooting 67's and having the film processed and proofed at
my local wedding lab, the total cost of film/develop/proof was about
$1.35 per frame. Certainly not too cheap. The other problem around
here was that labs all switched over to digital equipment, so even
though my lab had all
This may be a naive question, but why do you change to the Leica when the
lighting is extremely bad at concerts?
What I have noticed is that my DS has problems when the light is very red.
Is this what you refer to when saying this, and does the Leica Fuji press
handle this differently?
Tim
Godfrey,
You bring up a great point. Brightness is only one aspect of the
finder. I base most of my preference on the ability to manually
focus. My niece was visiting a while back. She had a Nikon D70 with
her and I tried to focus it manually - yuch! It was bright, but very
difficult to tell
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:25:30AM +0100, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote on 22.03.06 3:01:
The DS viewfinder is a little larger and a bit brighter, which makes
it easier to use manual focus.
Godfrey, it is viewfinder in Dl that is noticeably brighter than the one in
Ds -
Scott,
I'm attaching the result of my messin' with FOG.
Not a critisizm of yours, just tinkering.
Added a tad of contrast for depth and attempted to take a faint magenta
out of the sky. Probably caused by my monitor.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=104
--- Scott
David J Brooks wrote:
Sorry for the OT, but i receieved an email from the General Manager of
the proposed Radio Station for Stouffville and the application to the
CRTC(FCC for those in the USA)has been sent in.
If it is successfull we'll be on 102.7 FM with 50 Watts of pure power
at out
ditto.
Symmetry worked for me in that shot as well
On 3/22/06, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
There have been two opinions on this shot. The first is shared by you
and a number of others--too symmetric, too centered, etc. I agree that
the center position of the door breaks
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:39:11AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
WRT the Pentax World Photoshoot, I noticed that Dario Bonazza and John
Francis have contributed general photos, but not Pentax World Day
shots. I saw a few other PDML names (hi, Cesar!) but without photos.
That's odd - I've only
I think the MILF Hunter photo is mine (From the habitats at GFM).
Must have missed that one when it was made, though. No idea who made
the design.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Which tele lens for poor mans bird photography
Jostein wrote:
I think the MILF Hunter photo is mine (From the habitats at GFM).
Must have missed that one when it was made, though. No idea who made the
design.
cavedude, just about the time he dropped off the list... again
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Sorry for the OT, but i receieved an email from the General Manager of
the proposed Radio Station for Stouffville and the application to the
CRTC(FCC for those in the USA)has been sent in.
If it is successfull we'll be on 102.7 FM with 50 Watts of
Christian wrote:
Jostein wrote:
I think the MILF Hunter photo is mine (From the habitats at GFM).
Must have missed that one when it was made, though. No idea who made the
design.
cavedude, just about the time he dropped off the list... again
Christian, wasn't the original cormorant shot
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
