On Sep 2, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
You should know that Jargon definitions are often at odds with
what's in
the Dictonary, and for good reason (Jargon must be precise, but
doesn't
tend to worry about namespace collision outside the field in which its
used). This is Jargon.
I
Mat,
A fresh pleasing shot. While there may not be recoverable detail in the
blossoms, they are so blown out as to glow. If that's your mood choice,
I get it.
I looked at it with the bottom cropped and it feels better to me as a
pano. I think the large leaves on the right work as an offset to the
Congrats, Mike. It's a very fine lens. You'll love it.
BTW: We don't call a 50mm or a 77mm lens a zoom. Those a primes.
A zoom lens is a lens with variable focal length. Your Sigma 70-300mm is a
zoom lens.
Haha, yeah, I always get that wrong. :) telephoto was the word I
intended. :)
Very nice shot, although I would prefer seeing a bit of the natural
environment.
Nevertheless a beautiful photograph.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Increasing DOF will sharpen all of the background foliage. The soft
look certainly works here.
Jack
--- Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice, Mat
Thank you. :-)
Perhaps the flowers could be a bit sharper but I like the
On 9/2/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks a little flat to me (considering the lighting thats not
surprising) seems to have a yellow colour cast
A curves adjustment to darken the foliage helps to make the flowers stand out.
Take 2:
Main kit? I don't have a main kit. I've a bunch of lenses and different
cameras that I use as needed or as the mood strikes me.
The K24/2.8 has turned in some surprising results, as has the K35/2.0, and
the A50/1.4 is better than expected. From a totally different perspective,
the K55/1.8 has
You'll love the FA77. It's a superb lens.
Your kit is pretty similar to mine in some ways. I am working only
with the Pentax digital SLR bodies ...
DA14/2.8
Zenitar 16/2.8 FE
FA20-35/4 AL
FA35/2 AL
FA50/1.4
A50/2.8 Macro
FA77/1.8 Ltd
FA135/2.8 IF
Rear Converter-A 2x-S
Automatic Extension Tubes
I don'tr see a feild like that in the EXIF data of my *ist D. However,
there's a field saying:
InteroperabilityOffset: 56362
What on earth does that mean?
I know my D has taken appr. 4 shots.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
Mike,
Your lens kit is never complete.
It only appears to be from time to time. :-)
(And we can surely help you to find new stuff to lust for.)
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I placed an order yesterday for the FA77 ltd, which pretty well completes
my kit
Hey Mike, you can always set both ISO settings to the same value, when
needed.
What's the problem? However, when two different settings are welcome, such
independent ISO feature will be appreciated.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Michael Perham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss
Adam, Paul,
There is evidence that flies right in the face of your statements.
Take 600mm f/5.6, for example (links below). This is a convenient
comparison because it exists in both 645 and K mount A-series. The
only dimension being smaller for the 645 is length. I haven't done the
maths, but it
And next year would be... 2007, right?
My reference was the official roadmap where you can count for yourself.
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf
It does not extend to next year. Any information you would like to share? :-)
Jostein
On 9/2/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: 03 September 2006 00:39
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Loving Family
Somehow I'm missing the point of this. Is it a criticism of Paul's
reaction? or..?
...just
BTW again. When commenting on the title I referred to the
online title. The
PESO title is probably brilliant too, but I don't
understand it. Could you
elaborate please?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
UK slang for child. Particularly your own. Don't know the
On Sep 3, 2006, at 3:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I placed an order yesterday for the FA77 ltd, which pretty well
completes
my kit of lenses!
I think you'll learn pretty quickly that a lens kit is never
complete. Once that lens arrives you'll be wanting the 31 and 43...
- Dave
--
On Sep 3, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Thibouille wrote:
If the Sv thing is that you choose sensitivity and the camera does the
rest than it is stupid:
There have occasionally been times when I want both a specific DOF
and a specific shutter speed at the same time (I don't remember
exactly why). In
On Sep 2, 2006, at 8:22 PM, Michael Perham wrote:
I agree, not that I know him, but certainly from his writing I have
come to
respect his opinion and judgement enormously. Also, from his
articles and
snapshots that often accompany them, I get the impression he has
strong
family
Well, I'm glad it reached Flickr, the PDML as well as Greece and Canada.
Whats wrong with natural nudity (the girls are not naked) - I mean the
kind of nudity anyone can can see in public places like any beach in the
western world?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45
Thanks, Bob.
The title wasn't really my idea. I was in a speed boat while my son was
waterskiing.
The captain - a Canadian guy named Bill, pointed at the girls and said
something like this: Look, please make me a photo of those two. Mixed
Grill - ha!
So I did and I have posted him the picture as
Don't know if we're talking Photoshop here?
But if we are, you must pull the curve very gently. Often very small
adjustmests are required.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Foto Magazin (Germany) 4 pages reveiw (Number 9, 2006) says it a lot of
camera for the money.
I did´t know it had a stainless steel box inside (like the *ist D) - as well
as fiber-glass built in to the shell at some places.
It also says that the Pentax Shake Reduction System will save you 3
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
happen. If you have a *ist-DS and a D you can compare the two and see
that the D actually has a mirror box the same size as the MZ/ZX series
cameras, while the Ds mirror box is narrower, obviously made for the new
APS format sensor.
Leftovers.
We
Looks better to me.
I don't know how your system is calibrated, but it looks the same
whether I view the shot in Photoshop Firefox
Dave
On 9/3/06, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take 2:
http://www.matoe.org/gallery2/v/tomatoe/testscans/IMGP0046_2.jpg.html
This time, I white-balanced
On 9/3/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
We don't know why the holes are only
a promise and rumor of some kind of in lens motor.
Were they there in the -D/DS/DL? If not, it's reintroduction.
They're not on the D.
Someone at dpreview
I tend to think that Pentax will produce only DA lenses. But I also
still feel that the size difference between FDA and DA at longer focal
lengths could be minimal.
Paul
On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:02 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Adam, Paul,
There is evidence that flies right in the face of your
On 03/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is evidence that flies right in the face of your statements.
Take 600mm f/5.6, for example (links below). This is a convenient
comparison because it exists in both 645 and K mount A-series. The
only dimension being smaller for the 645
That should be that TAv position on the mode dial of the K10D.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: K10D
On Sep 3, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Thibouille wrote:
If the
A favorite indoor sport.
Thanks, Bob
Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: 03 September 2006 00:39
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Loving Family
I believe you're meant to buy two cameras, setting one up for ambient
lighting and the other for flash. Most manufacturers want you to buy more
product, not less :-(
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dario
Bonazza
I would appreciate it if you removed that image.
Paul
On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
A favorite indoor sport.
Thanks, Bob
Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent:
It is indeed a good idea IMO, if it can be deactivated of course..
2006/9/3, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey Mike, you can always set both ISO settings to the same value, when
needed.
What's the problem? However, when two different settings are welcome, such
independent ISO feature will
Just to chime in for a comment, I never miss Herbert in Pop Photo.
He deliverers practical informative messages every month and done in a
swagger free manner.
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2006, at 8:22 PM, Michael Perham wrote:
I agree, not that I know him, but
Den 3. sep. 2006 kl. 01.52 skrev K.Takeshita:
I encountered the following link in a Japanese site where folks are
scratching their heads and teasing each other :-).
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOCIDX=JP2005354330F=0
This looks like an attachment to the mount with a built-in
I'd be pleased to, but is it possible once archived?
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate it if you removed that image.
Paul
On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
A favorite indoor sport.
Thanks, Bob
Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm just asking you to remove my photo from your site. The message will
remain in the archive of course. In fact, I'm insisting that your
remove my photo from your site.
Paul
On Sep 3, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
I'd be pleased to, but is it possible once archived?
Jack
--- Paul
Dario Bonazza wrote:
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 3, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Thibouille wrote:
If the Sv thing is that you choose sensitivity and the camera does the
rest than it is stupid:
There have occasionally been times when I want both a specific DOF
and a specific
Jack Davis wrote:
Just to chime in for a comment, I never miss Herbert in Pop Photo.
He deliverers practical informative messages every month and done in a
swagger free manner.
I also generally like his stuff. He's remarkably outspoken considering
the extent to which Pop Photo relies on happy
On 3/9/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I'm glad it reached Flickr, the PDML as well as Greece and Canada.
Whats wrong with natural nudity (the girls are not naked) - I mean the
kind of nudity anyone can can see in public places like any beach in the
western world?
The PUG is
On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I also generally like his stuff. He's remarkably outspoken considering
the extent to which Pop Photo relies on happy advertisers for revenue.
He's even better and more honest when he writes for trade mags.
He's in the enviable position at
Bob Shell wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I also generally like his stuff. He's remarkably outspoken considering
the extent to which Pop Photo relies on happy advertisers for revenue.
He's even better and more honest when he writes for trade mags.
He's in the enviable
I had to try one Peter ... just to know I could do it. Hard to say how
successful it is as I don't care much for such photos. A few months ago I
asked for people to send me samples of their flower pics, just to get some
ideas for this little experiment. Looking at lighting, framing, subject,
Den 3. sep. 2006 kl. 15.18 skrev Cotty:
On 3/9/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I'm glad it reached Flickr, the PDML as well as Greece and
Canada.
Whats wrong with natural nudity (the girls are not naked) - I
mean the
kind of nudity anyone can can see in public places
Thanks, Ken very pleased that you like the shot.
As for perfection, well, the world is an imperfect place. I got rid of a
blemish on one or two of the leaves, but wanted the OOF area as a social
statement to show the imperfect reality in which we live while alluding to
the idea that some
Paul, don't fret, this is all going to be OK. Tell me how I do that.
It's been deleted from my files. (?)
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just asking you to remove my photo from your site. The message
will
remain in the archive of course. In fact, I'm insisting that
Me too. I'm retired!
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I also generally like his stuff. He's remarkably outspoken
considering
the extent to which Pop Photo relies on happy advertisers for
revenue.
He's
On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:28 AM, DagT wrote:
Den 3. sep. 2006 kl. 15.18 skrev Cotty:
On 3/9/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I'm glad it reached Flickr, the PDML as well as Greece and
Canada.
Whats wrong with natural nudity (the girls are not naked) - I
mean the
kind of
Thanks Bob.
Your photographs are very nice and informative. I find this tecnique very
useful for such overview shots.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Shell wrote:
You won't see this on USA beaches. Except for a very few nude
beaches, nudity or even just plain topless women is banned. Thong and
T-back swimsuits are also banned on many beaches. I've witnessed
culture clash many times in Florida when European tourists tried to
act
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Some of these guys seem to own every lens Pentax ever made. I would call
that pretty complete grin.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Mike,
Your lens kit is never
Hi Mark,
Tried to respond off-list, but your mail server rejects. It also
rejects the address I used to contact you through. What should I do?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Den 3. sep. 2006 kl. 15.42 skrev Bob Shell:
You won't see this on USA beaches. Except for a very few nude
beaches, nudity or even just plain topless women is banned. Thong and
T-back swimsuits are also banned on many beaches. I've witnessed
culture clash many times in Florida when
I've seen mention of D FA lenses in a few threads here. I believe that
John or Godders mentioned that these lenses were designed with digital
capture in mind and that they were also designed for a full frame sensor,
or at least a sensor larger than that currently used in Pentax DSLR's. Do I
have
The Great Wall of Roberts strikes again.
Dave ;-)
On 9/3/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
Tried to respond off-list, but your mail server rejects. It also
rejects the address I used to contact you through. What should I do?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
The only D FA lenses being produced are the two macro's, the 50 and 100. I
believe the 100 was jointly developed with Tokina, the 50 is based on the
old 50 mm macro. Anyway, the old macro's were a bit large and heavy for
todays DSLRs and I believe the antireflective coatings are the only digital
However, 23-year-old Ian Bigelow,...
Do you think thats his real name?
:-)
Dave
On 9/3/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They should go to Brattleboro, Vermont:
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060825-092642-8628r
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Hi Mark,
Tried to respond off-list, but your mail server rejects. It also
rejects the address I used to contact you through. What should I do?
Try my university address robertsm duq edu
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML
I have no complaints about that shot...other than it's to small.
lecherous grin
Dave ;-)
On 9/3/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder what the h... happened to my contribution - Mixed Grill or
Juxt4283? I'm sure I uploaded it long time ago. Was it subject to
censorship???
You don't know how to remove a file from your web page at Photo
Light? It's still up. Get it down.
On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Paul, don't fret, this is all going to be OK. Tell me how I do that.
It's been deleted from my files. (?)
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL
In a message dated 9/3/2006 4:29:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tend to think that Pentax will produce only DA lenses. But I also
still feel that the size difference between FDA and DA at longer focal
lengths could be minimal.
Paul
===
You know, I am not sure of
It's probably in there but you need a TIFF parser to see it. If you
make two exposures back to back of a plain white field, all settings
manual and the same, the only difference will be timestamps and
exposure count, file name, so you should be able to find it that way.
Godfrey
On Sep 2,
Why not just allow two or more user defined custom setup options
and let it go at that? I don't know why i'd trust the camera to
automate choosing which of them I wanted, and if I did I might just
as well use Auto Picture with flash on automatic and ISO on
automatic, that does close to
in sum, building on Mike's reply:
A D-FA designation means that the lens will cover 35mm film format,
is in the latest Pentax lens mount (supporting Quickshift, aperture
ring and A setting for aperture), and has been enhanced to work
well with the digital sensors (antireflection coatings,
Jens, not in the US of A - except at certain specified nude
beaches. You can't
go topless here in public places if you are a woman.
there are places where
it could land you in jail.
It is better to not put PUG up for possible censorship here
by doing it ourselves.
The picture is a bit,
The D FAs are supposed to be for both film and digital. Whether they
indicate that someday there will be a 24 x 36 mm sensor in a Pentax DSLR
is anyone's guess.
There are reports (pretty reliable) of a forthcoming D FA telezoom
(called high performance in Pentax's lens chart), and rumors of D
While I don't have a problem with nudity or photos of nude men, women, or,
dare I say it, children, I don't like this photo at all for exactly the
reason you state, Ann. In fact, I don't like a lot of photos because of
that - pics made with long lenses that seem to intrude on private or
personal
Jens,
Unfortunately, a large part of the USA is populated with a prudish,
prurient bunch of people. And lots of idiotic rules are in place to
support and protect the mores of this cultural milieu, who feel so
threatened by the sight of skin as to call it an abomination before
God or other
You won't see this on USA beaches. Except for a very few nude
beaches, nudity or even just plain topless women is banned.
Thong and
T-back swimsuits are also banned on many beaches. I've witnessed
culture clash many times in Florida when European tourists tried
to
act normally and
Hey! I resemble that.
Dave
On 9/3/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From last week's New Yorker:
http://www.web-options.com/NewYorker.jpg
(actually, I think this applies to most of us!)
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Godfrey, and others.
I just recognized something from my own childhood. Trying to look at
something interesting, so concentrated I almost fell into the water...
DagT
Den 2. sep. 2006 kl. 02.08 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:
Darn good photo, Dag, and I couldn't care less whether it was
Thanks Tim.
The skin tones are OK on the screen at home, a 20 iMac G5, but not
on the crappy screen I have at work they look over exposed, so they
may be a little bit too bright.
DagT
Den 31. aug. 2006 kl. 19.38 skrev Tim Øsleby:
It makes me smile, thinking of my own childhood.
Love the
It will be got down when my web person responds to my earlier email.
There was a time (with a previous host) that I had the links, but they
no longer work.
He may not be available today, you'll just have to be patient.
Your demanding mode is not helping.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL
This is a question about composition. I came across the following photo
(not mine):
http://www.zyeuter.com/bon_baiser_de_valensole/photo107872.html
There is much about it that I like, but I think that the bottom third is
a mistake. It seems to me that the photographer should have cut off the
Any auto operation (other than vital functions of human beings... maybe)
must allow deactivation.
This is my firm belief.
Ther must be a ISO sensitivity setting menu item with the following
options:
1 - flash linked to available light
2 - flash independent from available light
By choosing
I agree with you about the lower third, but I think the rest of of it
is fine as it is. It wouldn't hurt it to move the frame a little to
the right, but I don't think it's necessary because the size of the
tree provides enough balance for the house.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
Godfrey,
My only intent is to prevent having to change ISO setting a hundred times a
hour in the dark with the D (and D users know what I mean) when shooting
concerts the like and wanting to switch back and forth between available
light and flash shooting. Nothing more and nothing less.
I
I quite like it the way it is.
The field homestead are separated by a the river of purple
flowers, with 3 distinct zones. If anything I would like more of the
lower section. If it had been composed as you suggest, then it's just
another cliched building in a field shot.
There's no need to
Where can I find a TIFF parser ?
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:17:37 +0100, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I also generally like his stuff. He's remarkably outspoken considering
the extent to which Pop Photo relies on happy advertisers for revenue.
He's even better and more
If he thinks he can't be fired, he might be in for a nasty shock, unless
he owns 51% of the company.
John
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:17:37 +0100, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I also generally like his stuff. He's remarkably outspoken
Staying simple:
FAJ are FA without aperture ring.
DA are FAJ but cover only APS-C sensors (As far as we know) and
optimized for digital
DFA are FA optimized for Digital
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hopefully there will be.
Dave
On 9/3/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just allow two or more user defined custom setup options
and let it go at that?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 9/3/2006 9:37:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Staying simple:
FAJ are FA without aperture ring.
DA are FAJ but cover only APS-C sensors (As far as we know) and
optimized for digital
DFA are FA optimized for Digital
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
Etymologically, super means above, and ultra means beyond. So
supersonic means above human hearing, ie: pitched too high, whilst
ultrasonic could be either too low or too high.
John
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:30:28 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 2, 2006, at 1:31
In a message dated 9/2/2006 5:59:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The top lens was the Sigma 100mm with 88/100 which
ranked far above
the 150 and 180 offerings from this company. In
second place was the
Tamron 90mm, marginally ahead of the Pentax.
(86/100)
One hopes
hi.
this just happened one afternoon last month.
my daughter was trying her best to catch the light streaming in thru the
window and making patterns on the floor. a wonderful moment I just didnt
want to disturb. this is the only pic with her 'still', so to say... others
show much movement
DFA are usable on ALL pentax film bodies.
FAJ are usable but only with body from A generation and beyond and
several with limited functionality since their are always in 'A' mode.
An FAJ (or a DA BTW) will work on a SuperA/MZ5/MZS/SF but only in TV and P mode.
Of course the DA won't cover 35mm
On 04/09/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Etymologically, super means above, and ultra means beyond. So
supersonic means above human hearing, ie: pitched too high, whilst
ultrasonic could be either too low or too high.
Even though you are correct when I read or hear the term
If you don't want me to be demanding, then don't post images without
asking. I don't know why you would need a web person to manage images
on a public site, but perhaps that's the way you do things.
On Sep 3, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
It will be got down when my web person responds
Very, very, very nice.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of gibikote
Sent: 03 September 2006 17:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: peso: catchlight
hi.
this just happened one afternoon last month.
my
Very interesting photograph. It contains a lot of (photographic and
otherwise) symbolism.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
gibikote
Sendt: 3.
I've looked on the magazine website www.photographymonthly.com where
there is a discussion group. In fairness to Nikon (will that phrase
get me barred from PDML?) it was their old 200mm lens not the latest
VR xyz etc. Doesn't stop them charging £1000+ for it tho'!
Peter
On 9/3/06, [EMAIL
Peter, are you syaing that good test results are often or genrally paid
for, by the avertisers?
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Peter
I wouldn't know, from all accounts the plugged holes are completely
hidden from view on the K100D the only way to discover them is by
destructive disassembly of the mirror box. I'm not prepared to do that
with a working camera. I can however tell you that the *ist-D mirror
box seems to be
gibikote wrote:
this just happened one afternoon last month.
my daughter was trying her best to catch the light streaming in thru the
window and making patterns on the floor. a wonderful moment I just didnt
want to disturb. this is the only pic with her 'still', so to say... others
show much
I was referring to the meaning of the prefixes. I agree that supersonic
usually means above the speed of sound.
John
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:57:54 +0100, Digital Image Studio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/09/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Etymologically, super means above, and
You did it very well. There may be a few small problems as some have
pointed out, but the reality is that most of the defects are a matter of
perception.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I had to try one Peter ... just to know I could do it. Hard to say how
successful it is as I don't care much for
I wouldn't miss it. I generally beleive that any automatic function requires
that you know how to outsmrrt it. In other words - more automatics means
more thinking and more errors. I recently talked to someone who was going to
graduate as a photographer shortly. She told me that they are taught
I like this. A very interesting scene. Nice work!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, September 3, 2006, 9:45:23 AM, you wrote:
g hi.
g this just happened one afternoon last month.
g my daughter was trying her best to catch the light streaming in thru the
g window and making patterns on the
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
