Wow! Most excellent work. The dusting of snow helps things, but
mostly you done very good work here. Thanks for sharing those.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, October 28, 2006, 4:29:15 PM, you wrote:
ME On our summer vacation in the eastern Sierra we made a day trip over to
ME the ghost
Brilliant, Bruce. I like the back or side light. The cob web is a nice
touch.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bruce
Dayton
Sendt: 24. oktober
I try to have biult-in hoods or hoods on or with each lens. A hood is
important. An excellent lens can produce horrible photographe, if there is a
flare to ruin the result. This is photography - every little thing in a long
process counts, in the final result.
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
I must admit, I nearly didn't bother to look at these, ghost towns are
such a cliché in American photography. But I'm glad I looked because
the snow and the way you've processed them makes them much more
interesting than the cliché, and gives an extra dimension to the
scenes. I think you've been
Very nice, Elliott...er, I mean, Ann.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ann sanfedele
Sent: 29 October 2006 03:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: son of sign language calendar a bit of self promotion.
That would depend on the status of the land, and the law in the relevant
state. In some cases you probably could.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fascinating. Escellent photos. It's interesting to think what life must have
been like in this town before it was abandoned. I've often wondered if these
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/29 Sun AM 01:05:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: USA tour 2004 now online
ann sanfedele wrote:
You guys are just baying at the moon - but I've been racking my brains
horsing around to come up with
Jens Bladt wrote:
Brilliant, Bruce. I like the back or side light. The cob web is a nice
touch.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Not sure you're even *allowed* to like that shot on this list, Jens...
That nicely gathered image has garnered more criticism than a lot of
others, for some odd reason.
Many
Hi Mark
Extremely pleasant to watch, thank you!
greetings
Markus
- Original Message -
From: Mark Erickson
Subject: Another GESO: Bodie Ghost Town October 2006
http://www.westerickson.net/bodiefall2006/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 28, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Mark Erickson wrote:
Rhyolite (in Death Valley National Park) is another protected ghost
town.
Due to lack of budget and natural deterioration, there isn't much
left at Rhyolite, and they've built a very ugly fence up close around
the one well-preserved
Old lenses for Exakta 35mm cameras are not bad at all:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594349687299/show/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database:
Lots of fun, Ann. Good work.
Paul
On Oct 29, 2006, at 2:43 AM, Bob W wrote:
Very nice, Elliott...er, I mean, Ann.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ann sanfedele
Sent: 29 October 2006 03:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
John Celio wrote:
Sad and frustrating news: Friday night after closing for the day,
Reed's
Cameras Imaging, my former employer, shut down all but the lab
portion of
the store.
Kinda shoots down that whole support small local shops instead of
buying from the big Internet retailers argument,
Mark Roberts wrote:
Kinda shoots down that whole support small local shops
instead of buying from the big Internet retailers argument,
doesn't it?
:(
I've more or less given up with small shops. Getting Pentax products locally
has been a pain for a number of years anyway, but the last
Malcolm Smith schrieb:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Kinda shoots down that whole support small local shops
instead of buying from the big Internet retailers argument,
doesn't it?
:(
I've more or less given up with small shops. Getting Pentax products locally
has been a pain for a number of
On 27.10.06, at 23:10 , Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The National Geographic has some great photos in every issue, never
more
evident today while I was perusing a back issue. Is there a way to
find out
whether a photo was taken with film or digital, and maybe even
information
on the cameras
thanks, Paul -
cross fingers it catches on :)
ann
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Lots of fun, Ann. Good work.
Paul
On Oct 29, 2006, at 2:43 AM, Bob W wrote:
Very nice, Elliott...er, I mean, Ann.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Well you know how to please a lady! ;-)
thanks, Bob
ann
Bob W wrote:
Very nice, Elliott...er, I mean, Ann.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ann sanfedele
Sent: 29 October 2006 03:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Oct 29, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Shel, go to:
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/
just type in search field word Pentax and see the results. You
will find some articles where either 645 or 67 were used for taking
photos. In one article I believe Pentax 35 mm camera was
no passport, but a drivers license for B passenger cars up to 3500 kg, G
tractor, and H for a moped, a motorcycle I guess.
On Saturday 28 October 2006 07:21, David Savage wrote:
Something along the same line:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/Passport%20photo.jpg
I can't remember
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Another GESO: Bodie Ghost Town October 2006
That would depend on the status of the land, and the law in the
relevant
state. In some cases you probably could.
I believe the town of Silverton BC is a privately owned ghost town.
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Macro
Jens Bladt wrote:
Brilliant, Bruce. I like the back or side light. The cob web is a
nice
touch.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Not sure you're even *allowed* to like that shot on this list, Jens...
That nicely gathered
I like this one.
The short forground against the taller background really makes it.
Dave
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Been working through pictures from the trip.
One set I've been working on are from a morning's ride out to
Montpelier on the Isle of Man. There's a stand of
Some of those are really good.
I like silverlake02/03. The first two birch tree shots are great.
Dave
Quoting Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All,
Took my summer vacation a little late this year. We spent a week on the
east side of the Sierra Nevada range in California. This was a family
Very nice.
I like the tower.
Dave
Quoting Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello PDML,
Last night we had a beautiful sunset, and I couldn't resist taking a
photo, even knowing that it may turn out to be kitsch. Here it is:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5130569
Click on
From: Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.westerickson.net/bodiefall2006/
Very nice work, Mark. You've picked beautiful compositions and I like
what you've done with the rendering. It would be a powerful piece to
hang in a gallery.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It's odd - my first reaction was positive, and then I thought it might be
framed a little too tight. Then I looked at the larger pic, and didn't
feel that way at all. Strange how size and presentation can influence the
viewer, at least this viewer.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey
Many folks here have a different vision than you. Many photographers want
to hear all comments about their work. Many folks on the list try to be
helpful with their comments. I'm disappointed to know that you feel the
way you do.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: keith_w
Not sure you're
I think a Comments Welcome phrase stirs up the pot, and brings the
dregs to the top
I didn't see a smiley so
If someone doesn't want comments all he has to do is say so...
and I and others won't waste their time.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: keith_w [EMAIL
Yup.
Personally, I like getting comments of any kind on the photos I post.
Some prove to be very helpful: they let me see things that I might
not have seen.
Godfrey
On Oct 29, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I think a Comments Welcome phrase stirs up the pot, and brings the
Having made quite a few fungi/mushroom shots the last couple
of weeks, I decided to put them in a seperate gallery now.
Most shots are from a single day last week, shot with
the istD, the A* 200mm Macro and tripod :-)
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=18
Comments welcome!
I
Hmm. Well, I discovered this morning that the camera and lens were
645 and 45mm lens ... not quite the 90 degree across the diagonal
that I prefer, but still quite wide. Is the 45mm lens also a good one?
(The question is almost a little too näive sounding because I haven't
found too many
And very smart too. Not only may they sell you the 400mm, but a new
K100D too. Unlike the store where Cotty went that managed to sell
nothing to a money-in-hand-buyer with their attitude.
--graywolf
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
Fortunately, my local store is totally different. Some weeks ago, I
Hi Mark,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:29:15 -0700, Mark Erickson wrote:
On our summer vacation in the eastern Sierra we made a day trip over to
the ghost town of Bodie. We were there for the first snow flurries of the
winter season.
Yeah, lots of snow for a 'summer' vacation :-)
The iron skies
A friend just purchased a D200 so we did some comparo shots yesterday. Same
scene, fl, exposure, etc. His D200 and my istDL. He emailed me a couple
frames, 5.8 meg jpegs. I printed his and mine, 7 x 10.5 inches on photo
quality paper. He nor I can detect ANY difference in print quality. My
I agree. Comments are good. Some improve the work, some don't. But they're all
valuable.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup.
Personally, I like getting comments of any kind on the photos I post.
Some prove to be very
Back in the 80's recession I was working in a Convenience Store/Gas
Station (because the was the only type of job I could find at the time,
in SE Michigan were really bad), the first snow of the year I moved the
most expensive snow brushes up buy the register and asked everyone if
they had a
On 29.10.06, at 16:09 , Bob Shell wrote:
This doesn't mean it was used on a Pentax camera, though. National
Geographic used to have an in-house repair shop that also did
modifications, and they often modified lenses to fit different camera
systems. Sadly that all fell victim to budget cuts
I think if you're never going to print larger than 8x10 from a full-frame
image, 6 megapixels is more than adequate. If you print larger, the 10
megapixel camera will offer an advantage. What' more, it will allow for
aggressive cropping when necessary.
Paul
-- Original message
I've been tempted to buy 645 gear for the simple reason that it will probably
be a good investment. Once the 645D is released, used lens prices will
undoubtedly go up. I've seriously considered buying numerous 645lenses,
particularly the autofocus versions. Stockpile, then sell. I wish I had
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Hmm. Well, I discovered this morning that the camera and lens were
645 and 45mm lens ... not quite the 90 degree across the diagonal
that I prefer, but still quite wide. Is the 45mm lens also a good one?
(The question is almost a little too näive sounding because I
Walter Hamler wrote:
A friend just purchased a D200 so we did some comparo shots yesterday.
Same
scene, fl, exposure, etc. His D200 and my istDL. He emailed me a couple
frames, 5.8 meg jpegs. I printed his and mine, 7 x 10.5 inches on photo
quality paper. He nor I can detect ANY difference in
Did both cameras have really top notch lenses
And were both mounted on sturdy tripods? Lens
Quality is going to be more critical at 10Mp
To get the full benefit of 10Mp and of course
You need a sturdy camera to minimize shake.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
They like to use mega-pixels because it sounds like the sensor is 40%
bigger, only that is not how magnification works. In reality 40% bigger
than 6mp is 12mp, and you have to go to 24mp to get twice the
resolution. A 8.5 x 12 print from his camera and your 7x10.5 would be
have the same
My wife and I were on the South Pacific Island of Guam back in the mid 60's.
The local economy had only one department type store, and they surprisingly
had a large display of Levi's. Looking through the sizes, I could not find
34 waist, 31 L. I asked the sales girl, and she replied we can
The *ist DS image will be approximately 290 ppi output at that size
where the Nikon D200 image will be around 370 ppi. Those densities
are not going to show a lot of difference if any. I begin to see
differences between 6 and 10 Mpixel much more clearly when the output
ppi is getting down
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/700x467-IMGP8223.jpg
Fall colors today. I got my both feet wet in that swamp, looking for
something I didn't find. Had to return back home fast to get warm and
drink a cup of hot herbal tea of yarrow and honey. Guess what? Not going
to spend a week with flu.
Hello everybody!
I want to change the timestamp when the picture was taken - in the EXIF
of the images in RAW format - by a certain amount (to correct for
the incorrect time zone).
I know that the program called jhead is capable of doing it with JPEGs:
-ta+|-h[:mm[:ss]]
Adjust time by
I don't have any comarision shots but I was quite surprised by the quality of a
Meyer Optik Oreston 1.8/50 in M42 mount that I received on a camera I purchased
on EBay. I was going to sell on the lens but I tried it out on the istDS and
quite liked the result.
Cheers
Brian
Lovely shots Mark.
I wish i could find more places like that up here.I like the old
stuff myself.
Dave
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.westerickson.net/bodiefall2006/
Very nice work, Mark. You've picked beautiful compositions
Inspired by Van Gogh no doubt.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Roman
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 3:58 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: 700x467-IMGP8223.jpg (JPEG Image, 700x467 pixels)
Sylwester Pietrzyk escribió:
On 29.10.06, at 16:09 , Bob Shell wrote:
This doesn't mean it was used on a Pentax camera, though. National
Geographic used to have an in-house repair shop that also did
modifications, and they often modified lenses to fit different camera
systems. Sadly that
I met with a bunch of folks from the photo forums at Camden Lock
while in London. This was one of the pictures that leapt out at me as
I reviewed the day's session:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/30.htm
A half-rez version is available by clicking on the image shown at
this
If I didn't want comments, I wouldn't post photographs.
-Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. Comments are good. Some improve the work, some don't. But they're
all valuable.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup.
Somebody has to be the first to say it:
That's a-maize-ingly corny...
--
With regrets,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 29 October 2006 21:19
To: PAW; DUG; SeePhoto Talk; PDML List
Subject: PAW 2006 -
that has the makings of a very good picture, but I wish it had a
baseline.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roman
Sent: 29 October 2006 20:58
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: 700x467-IMGP8223.jpg (JPEG Image, 700x467
came up blank here, bill
no matter which browser I used
ann
Bill Owens wrote:
Subject line says it all.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5121929
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Gorgeous light - nicely seen - worth getting wet feet for, I'd say.
Bob - what does baseline mean?
ann
Bob W wrote:
that has the makings of a very good picture, but I wish it had a
baseline.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Brrr, it looks cold there.
The perspective or lack of perspective makes this semi abstract intriguing.
There is more grain than I'd expect with 50 ISO Velvia, but I like the
effect.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Sorry Bill. The colours do not work.
My monitor may be far off. So read this with a handful of salt.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Owens
Sent: 25. oktober 2006 18:20
To:
On 29/10/06, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody!
I want to change the timestamp when the picture was taken - in the EXIF
of the images in RAW format - by a certain amount (to correct for
the incorrect time zone).
I know that the program called jhead is capable of doing
That's a-maize-ingly corny...
Very nice though, hopefully one of a cereal presentation.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: PAW 2006 - 30 - GDG
That's a-maize-ingly corny...
Very nice though, hopefully one of a cereal presentation.
Cotty Chex out the latest pun thread.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I think Bob is referring to the fact the vertical lines draw the eye
downwards, to the ground or some such object, but it is't in the shot.
This weakens an otherwise excellent image.
-Adam
ann sanfedele wrote:
Gorgeous light - nicely seen - worth getting wet feet for, I'd say.
Bob - what
Pentax ZX-50 body in E condition. Comes with cable release. $35 plus shipping.
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD A for Pentax AF in EX condition. $300
plus shipping.
Tamron AF 75-300mm f/4 - 5.6 LD Macro for Pentax AF in EX condition.
$50 plus shipping.
Sigma Fisheye 15mm f/2.8 EX DG for Pentax AF
Not bad. A nice within the scene shot. I find the black thing on the right
(Keith? Another rider?) a bit disturbing, as it is not enough recognizable
to be a component of the picture.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PAW [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML
I mean a line at the base of the frame which would give a little extra
stability and balance to the composition. For example, it would be
nice to see some of the water from which the reeds are growing.
Without it, it feels incomplete to me.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks P.J., Jan, Cotty, Rick, Bill, Paul, Markus, Bruce and Dave.
I think I'll have another picture taken during Photokina to show you.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Undoubtably well composed and exposed, but...out of my teeth, that pic
doesn't tell me so much.
Speaking of teeth, maybe havig two rows of corncobs entering the picture
from above and below could give the vague idea of a set of teeth...
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Macro
Jens Bladt wrote:
Brilliant, Bruce. I like the back or side light. The cob web is a
nice touch.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Not sure you're even *allowed* to like that shot on this list, Jens...
Thanks Mat. BTW, the only editing in that picture was cropping out a small
portion of the white wall on the right and a small part of the black floor,
and then finding a way so that the lower right diagonal line could still
cut the corner (previously being a bit higher than that. Photoshop
This is another picture taken at photokina:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/misc/misc17e.htm
Don't think there are two different pictures there, as there are 10 or so
(hanging within the scene ;-)
Seriously, the girl's face on the left is not a composit. It's just part of
the first picture in the
On Oct 29, 2006, at 14:18, graywolf wrote:
Graywolf's rule: Don't spend your money until performance will double.
Of course, if you want the features that the more costly item has, you
pay your money and enjoy those features, but you will not notice
much of
a performance gain.
I can't
Test - please ignore
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I need to send in my 77m Ltd for repair, and my istD for a cleaning.
Should I send them in two separate boxes to avoid confusion? Obviously
I'd like to send them both in one box to save a little money, but I
also want to make sure everything goes smoothly.
Thanks,
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
At 09:33 AM 30/10/2006, Simon King wrote:
Test - please ignore
'kay
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
A friend just purchased a D200 so we did some comparo shots yesterday.
Same scene, fl, exposure, etc. His D200 and my istDL. He emailed me a
couple frames, 5.8 meg jpegs. I printed his and mine, 7 x 10.5 inches on
photo quality paper. He nor I can detect ANY difference in print quality.
-
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha
Subject: sending 2 items to Pentax USA - send them separately?
I need to send in my 77m Ltd for repair, and my istD for a cleaning.
Should I send them in two separate boxes to avoid confusion? Obviously
I'd like to send them both in one box to
I would send things in individually, avoid any possible confusion.
Godfrey
On Oct 29, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Amita Guha wrote:
I need to send in my 77m Ltd for repair, and my istD for a cleaning.
Should I send them in two separate boxes to avoid confusion? Obviously
I'd like to send them both in
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Macro
Bottom line? I think *some* of those critical of images submitted let
their critical comments run away with them, and are occasionally going
just a wee bit overboard with it...
If a person puts an image up and
Since it was my photo that sparked this discussion, I should say that
I was happy to receive all comments and critiques. I think that it is
up to the individual to deal with the comments. Sometimes they help
me improve the image, sometimes they help me in future shots and
sometimes the comments
No, really, just ignore it.
.
.
.
It was never here ok?
Shh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Monday, 30 October 2006 10:16 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Ping IV
At 09:33 AM 30/10/2006, Simon King
Pong
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
And for a 3rd opinion... :) send one big box with two little boxes inside.
sounds like I'm making a joke, but I'm serious -
send it priority mail with a delivery confirmation slip.
ann
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I would send things in individually, avoid any possible confusion.
Godfrey
On
This is a shot I took in February and never really did anything with. I
revisited it on
the weekend armed with a few more months of experience with photoshop.
I processed the RAW file twice, once for shadow detail and once for highlights
and
sky colour. I then blended them in PS CS2. I
I look forward to the larger pixel density primarily for the cropping
potential. But, even without the larger size sensor, I would probably
get it fo rthe SR alone. Add in the other subtle refinements, like the
ability to manually control whether the camera is drawing power from
the batteries
Good idea! Also, identify yourself on both boxes and include
separately written repair information in each box numbered to match a
box number. Basic stuff, but there's no predicting the the handling
muffs possible.
I download their repair form attach any further info I feel may help.
Jack
---
Very nice capture. Love the features in the foreground rock.
Normally I like/want features in the sky, but in this shot I find the few
clouds in the ULH corner slightly distracting.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Dawn from the clifftops
Thanks, guys! Great idea. I think I'll do it that way. :)
Amita
On 10/29/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea! Also, identify yourself on both boxes and include
separately written repair information in each box numbered to match a
box number. Basic stuff, but there's no
Quite nice!
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Dawn from the clifftops
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:05:31 +1100
This is a shot I took in February and never
I rather like this one. Your skills look pretty good. It doesn't
seem to be overdone. I especially like the composition. The sky
helps emphasize the rock structures.
Nice work!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, October 29, 2006, 8:05:31 PM, you wrote:
jtca This is a shot I took in February
That certainly is sharp. It would be helpful, however, if you could tell us
which forum member is which...they all look the same to me.
:)
James
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PAW [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DUG [EMAIL PROTECTED];
SeePhoto Talk [EMAIL
I sent Roman a crop and a border - too sleepy to
ftp it to my home page (it is an annoying process on the
new server to sign in )
time to sleep
ann
Bob W wrote:
I mean a line at the base of the frame which would give a little extra
stability and balance to the composition. For example, it
Hi!
Just in case my off-list e-mail does not reach you, Amita... I am
interested in Tamron 28-75. If it is not too late, please contact me
off list.
Thanks.
On 10/30/06, Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax ZX-50 body in E condition. Comes with cable release. $35 plus shipping.
Tamron
Great shot James - colours and composition are spot on. Just not sure about
the clouds. Perhaps you could try cloning them out to see if it improves
things. But it's a minor quibble.
Where is this, by the way?
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
Hi James,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:05:31 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a shot I took in February and never really did anything with. I
revisited it on
the weekend armed with a few more months of experience with photoshop.
Beatiful shot!
I like the high dynamic range with good
96 matches
Mail list logo
