I think the main difference here is that the PEF requires compression,
while the DNG does not. So the speed for PEF would depend on the balance
between the increase in overhead for compression routine vs the reduction
in write time because of smaller file size. Slower writing during
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:39:22PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
1. The two-wheel approach that mirrors the PZ-1p.
And the *istD. A lot of D owners were VERY pleased to see this show
up on the K10D. Once you've had two wheels,
The butom one with ,ore contrast is more pllleasing, I think.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Shel
Belinkoff
Sendt: 25. november 2006 05:07
Right , Paul
I would correct the converging lines, though.
Very nice photograph.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Paul
Stenquist
Sendt: 25.
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, John Celio wrote:
You guys are forgetting the permanent magnets that are also part of the
system. I don't think the sensor plate would move much, if at all, unless
one of the electromagnets is turned on to make it do so.
But when the electromagnetic coil is not powered,
Well the cat represents a severe health and safety issue. Would you be
happy to see such a scene in a resaurant kitchen?
I suppose that's Nikon owners for you!!!
Best wishes
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 25/11/06, Brendan MacRae, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anyone else have some internal shifting about
when turning your K10D from landscape to horizontal?
Mine has a slight slip that I can feel when I do
this. Very disconcerting. It doesn't seen to affect
anything so far.
I was wondering
Hi Adam
The K100D does not permit you to override focal length parameters.
Damn!
But I believe that focal length and lens ID are tranmitted seperately.
I'm not sure how that would help.
I'm not aware of any TC for Pentax bodies which contains actual
firmware, which would be necessary to
I have a nice Pentax camera with an aperture simulator.
It's not old. And it's not new.
Of cource it does use film in stead of a slow electronic
sensor/buffer/memory card.
But it gets the work done.
And I can use almost any K-mount lens.
It has minumum shutterlag.
No buffer size or write speed
Hi Bruce
Certainly the A and earlier zooms have the problem of not
transmitting the focal length in use. When I briefly tested my
Sigma 100-300/4 EX, the EXIF did indicate the correct focal length
of the images I shot, so I'm guessing it would properly transmit for
the SR. But the age
My K10D is making a horrible raspy/staticy noise whenever the shutter is
open. It's very quiet, I can't hear it unless I put my camera to my ear,
but I'm a little bit worried. I thought it was the Shake Reduction but it
is the same with SR on or off.
Could someone with a K10D check and see if
On 25/11/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am avoiding looking through the viewfinder of an inlens IS system for
this very reason.
I made that mistake and look what happened to me
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Amita Guha wrote:
to be repaired for free. But to solve the problem of above average IR
sensitivity,, you have to use a special IR filter on every lens. They
are providing two for free in any size the user wants.
I don't understand this fuss about such minor thing. Leica users either:
1.
I would have guessed that the auto focusing time could be slightly
affected/longer with sr on, there must be a reason for the off
switch.
The manual states to switch SR off when using the camera tripod mounted, I'll
be switching it off when panning moving subjects like World Superbike racers
So, given the impressive initial price of this new camera and the propensity
of camera prices to fall within six months to a year from launch, what do we
feel will be the final price point?
Certainly not until after Christmas and I guess it depends on how demand
holds up after the initial
Subject: Re: OT: Leica's M8 fixes
That's not an adequate fix. They made a serious miscalculation.
They
should be replacing the sensors.
Seconded. This goes against everything that Leica has ever
been. Sadly, my
money is on them simply being unable to afford to provide
that sort
My guess would be it's the SR mechanism holding the sensor in place.
But without having one (bugger!!!) I don't really know.
Dave
On 11/26/06, David Bliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My K10D is making a horrible raspy/staticy noise whenever the shutter is
open. It's very quiet, I can't hear it
On 25/11/06, K.Takeshita, discombobulated, unleashed:
Now, what the real probability of a commercial jet liner flying directly
over a nuke plant, somehow gets into trouble and makes a direct hit on the
structure. There is a figure for that probability (Rasmussen Report) but it
is on the order of
So panning will be an interesting experience?
Jostein
On 11/26/06, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel the same rattle. It's very subtle. It's not the battery or the
lens, and I don't have the grip.
I'm guessing that whatever the horizontal-vertical sensor is, is
what's rattling
With all the reservations you made on the technical quality, it's
still a fun shot.
Over here, the second storm (or maybe the third, I could have missed
one while abroad) is doing most of the job in the garden. Had to get
up and out tonight, to secure some loose bits and pieces. :-(
Jostein
On
On 11/26/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/11/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am avoiding looking through the viewfinder of an inlens IS system for
this very reason.
I made that mistake and look what happened to me
An all to familiar sad story. Talented padawan
You don't necessarily have to spend a lot of money in order to take nice
pictures.
Thes shots (/the BW ones) was doen with af 25$ nineteen sixties Petri Racer:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594377661456/
Thanks for looking
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
No virus found in
Great. It's nice to be able to leave the house with two fully charged
batteries.
Paul
On Nov 26, 2006, at 1:18 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Use them, charge them any time. Li-Ions are very very stable.
Godfrey
On Nov 25, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm now using the third-party
So far I've found changing ISO with the function button painless enough
that I haven't put ISO on the wheel. I still like having aperture and
shutter right where I want them all the time.
Paul
On Nov 26, 2006, at 3:08 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:39:22PM -0500, Paul
It's actually Ultra III or something. The newest Sandisk card. I
believe it said 133X on the package
On Nov 26, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Sandisk Ultra II cards are 60x rating.
Godfrey
On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's much faster than the *istDS,
SanDisk Extreme III (20MB/sec. read write)
Dave (where does the 6. multiple come from?)
On 11/26/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's actually Ultra III or something. The newest Sandisk card. I
believe it said 133X on the package
On Nov 26, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
I doubt if the price will drop below $899 for the next six months or
so. It looks like demand will continue to be strong at that price. In
fact, following the flurry of initial orders, most sellers raised the
price from $899 to $919.
Paul
On Nov 26, 2006, at 6:27 AM, cbwaters wrote:
So,
Using my A400/5.6 and A2X-S converter, I can simply dial in 800mm for
the SR system. At least I think I can. I've used the 400 alone and
dialed in the 400mm setting. I'll try it today. Although under most
circumstances I would use this rig with a tripod anyway.
Paul
On Nov 26, 2006, at 6:03
IS in the lens makes some people dizzy when using certain lenses.
SR in the body has the disadvantage that you can't see the effect
through the viewfinder and just have to trust that it is working.
Bob
On Nov 25, 2006, at 10:43 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
This may be a stupid question but does
http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/b/cbwaters/Photo/Fall2006/images/_IGP5098.jpg
cool. :-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
lovely picture, Ann. The only distracting element is the greenish
splotch in the lower right corner.
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Nov 26, 2006, at 12:24 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
thanks for your quick and precise answer :-)
I would have guessed that the auto focusing time could be slightly
affected/longer with sr on, there must be a reason for the off
switch. Since
I still use film, it's all only speculation from
Jens,
You don't necessarily have to spend a lot of money in order to take nice
pictures.
that's very true
Thes shots (/the BW ones) was doen with af 25$ nineteen sixties Petri Racer:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594377661456/
Thanks for looking
however following excerpt
On 11/26/06 5:28 AM, Cotty, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With modern terrorism, I would guess that the figures will be changing
with reassessment ongoing.
Yeah, I did not think of it :-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Oh, I got a bunch of shots of her looking at the turkey, but I liked
this one the best. :) Can't wait to meet your little girl!
Amita
On 11/26/06, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, lookng at you anyway :)
She looks like she is trying to be nonchalante -
what lovely coloring she
No buffer size or write speed limitations? Hmm. You can write 36
frames at full speed in 15 seconds (about 2.4 fps), then it takes
about 2 minutes to write the next one. What's that? ... :-)
G
On Nov 26, 2006, at 3:13 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I have a nice Pentax camera with an aperture
On Nov 26, 2006, at 2:30 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 25/11/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am avoiding looking through the viewfinder of an inlens IS
system for
this very reason.
I made that mistake and look what happened to me
On the other hand, if you don't see the image
Extreme III then. :-)
G
On Nov 26, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's actually Ultra III or something. The newest Sandisk card. I
believe it said 133X on the package
On Nov 26, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Sandisk Ultra II cards are 60x rating.
Godfrey
On Nov 25,
Are you serious? The cat wasn't on the surface where the food was, and
we would have removed her if she'd gone up there. I consider myself
lucky that my cats seem to have no interest in our kitchen counters.
As for restaurant kitchens, probably a lot goes on in them that you'd
rather not know
I suppose grab, was not the best word to use.
Sorry:-)
Dave
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Thanks Dave I have to say that I don't consider the shot particularly
successful, nor do I consider it a grab, based on what I think a grab
shot is.
The birds here are not
Using my A400/5.6 and A2X-S converter, I can simply dial in 800mm
for the SR system. At least I think I can. I've used the 400 alone
and dialed in the 400mm setting. I'll try it today.
Thanks Paul much appreciated, I tend to use a tripod beyond 300mm myself when
possible, cerainly beyond
On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:21 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
super macro mode, fluorescent white balance setting, f 3.5 1/125
dark side pro-1
Nice rose!
Color on my screen seems a little off: there's a slight greenish
tinge to the
Again, I didn't see original post, but I have to tell you the light is
just great. Nicely exposed and composed.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice Ann.
Dave
On 11/26/06, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Godfrey. Couldn't go and look at the moment. All I know for
certain is that it seemed to perform the same as the Transcend cards,
which is to say very well.
Paul
On Nov 26, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Extreme III then. :-)
G
On Nov 26, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Paul Stenquist
I'm looking at it on my calibrated cinema display this morning. I'd say
the rendering is a good compromise and probably accurate to the actual
color. The flower centers skew toward the orange; midway out on the
petals, they are a pure yellow; toward the edge of the petals, they
skew a small
2 minutes to change a roll?
Your seriously out of practice :-)
Dave
On 11/26/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No buffer size or write speed limitations? Hmm. You can write 36
frames at full speed in 15 seconds (about 2.4 fps), then it takes
about 2 minutes to write the next one.
On 11/26/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys are killing me.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In few days the K10D should reach Romania. I'll go to see it (and to
clean/repair my *istDS, it's wheel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Bliss
Sent: 26 November 2006 09:37
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: K10D makes horrible quiet noise?
My K10D is making a horrible raspy/staticy noise whenever the
shutter is
open. It's very
Hi Adam,
With the right shot, even 3200 is quite usable. I've got a very nice
16x20 on the wall, shot with the D at 3200. No NR or anything.
color or blackwhite?
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In technical specification closest focus distance is 14centimeters but
in Photodo forums there was posting stated that motorized AF can focus
as close as 1 inch (2.5cm). Can anyone please confirm this from their
own experience. Such close macro would give dramatic perspective to a
macro
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
That's probably the prettiest flower picture I've seen posted to the
PDML in 6 years... Nice shot, Ann!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hey! That's my line LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Every silver lining has its cloud, eh Joe?
On Nov 25, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Well, you need to cruise over to dpreview to see some of the problems
people are reporting. I understand that there
Glad you like 'em it's time to calibrate your monitor (or check your
eyes). They are quite noticeably different.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: ann sanfedele
THey look the same on my monitor...
I like them -
ann
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/bluescr2up.html
--
PDML
Years ago we had a family friend who was an exterminator in NYC. He told
us what went on in some of the best restaurant kitchens in town. A
number of years later I had an opportunity to inspect three or four
restaurant kitchens in Berkeley ... a lot _does_ go on that the customer is
better off
David Savage wrote:
My guess would be it's the SR mechanism holding the sensor in place.
But without having one (bugger!!!) I don't really know.
I'd believe that. My Canon 300/4 has the old Canon IS mechanism and
is very loud; you can basically here the elements churning around
inside
Beautiful Ann !!
Steve
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Well, then, you know little about Leica *users* Surely you are jesting or
being sarcastic right?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter Lacus
I don't understand this fuss about such minor thing. Leica users either:
1. collect cameras for resale them later or
2. use black and white
It is confusing as the minimum focus marking says 0.14m (140mm) but it
does focus closer past that marking.
Here are a couple of my initial test shots from when I first got the lens:
The lens hood was resting on the ball of my hand.
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/IMGP5038.jpg
And in this
Bob Shell wrote:
This is NOT the way
for Leica to deal with what are essentially defective sensors. They
should lean on Kodak to put a proper IR cutoff filter over the
sensors and do a recall on cameras already sold for sensor replacement.
I agree completely. But, man, there's gonna be
Hi Jens
none of my camera equipment was really expensive since I got most of it
used.
The most expensive part is the film, development and the prints :-)
Which out of your collection of old cameras is your favorite so far?
greetings
Markus
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL
Nice patterns
Dave
Quoting ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
super macro mode, fluorescent white balance setting, f 3.5 1/125
dark side pro-1
auto exposure
I haven't shot anything in ages
(except stuff for other
I think I'd much prefer the view with SR. I don't see it as a disadvantage.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Shell
IS in the lens makes some people dizzy when using certain lenses.
SR in the body has the disadvantage that you can't see the effect
through the viewfinder and just
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Once you've had two wheels, it's hard to go back
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/vfr.jpg
:-P
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
it's the latest firmware upgrade. Whenever the camera does something
that would previously have required an aperture simulator, it blows a
raspberry.
Bob
HAR!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
David Savage wrote:
On 11/26/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/11/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am avoiding looking through the viewfinder of an inlens IS system
for
this very reason.
I made that mistake and look what happened to me
An all to familiar sad
On 11/26/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behalf Of David Bliss
My K10D is making a horrible raspy/staticy noise whenever the
shutter is
open. It's very quiet, I can't hear it unless I put my
camera to my ear,
[...]
it's the latest firmware upgrade. Whenever the camera does
Yes, I can confirm that something of some mass moves inside the body
when you switch it from horizontal to vertical. But no problems so far,
so I imagine is a normal part of the system.
Angel Ramos
Arecibo, Puerto Rico
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Does anyone else have some internal shifting about
On 11/26/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
On 11/26/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/11/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am avoiding looking through the viewfinder of an inlens IS system
for
this very reason.
I made that mistake
John Whittingham wrote:
The manual states to switch SR off when using the camera tripod mounted, I'll
be switching it off when panning moving subjects like World Superbike racers
etc.
I'm going to try it both ways when panning, just in case it will help in
the vertical without hurting in
I should amend that comment to say ... a lot _does_ go on in some kitchens
that the customer is better off not knowing I've been in some wonderful
restaurant kitchens as well.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date:
On 11/26/06 9:48 AM, Mark Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once you've had two wheels, it's hard to go back
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/vfr.jpg
:-P
Good one, Mark! :-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
See ya soon - then you can look at it on my monitor - what could be
better than that to line up with my eye?
not greenish at all here, overall
ann
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:21 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
ah, praise from a flower guy
maybe your return prompted me to grab a flower :)
ann
Steven Larson wrote:
Beautiful Ann !!
Steve
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
wow - thanks, Christian !
Guess you like yellow roses too :)
ann
Christian wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
That's probably the prettiest flower picture I've seen posted to the
PDML in 6 years... Nice shot, Ann!
Peter, quite right... it bothers me too, but not enough that I'd alter
it in ph-shop
I cropped out a bit more distraction on the left - I only took two
shots before it got windy and I had to leave anyway.
ann
Peter Lacus wrote:
Just looked at the PUG, great shots in there btw, and i was hoping to
see next years themes, but we only go up to Dec 2006.
I still like to submit to the pug when i have a decent image, so will
there be any themes coming out soon.
Dave
Equine Photography in York Region
--
PDML
Angel Ramos a écrit :
David,
I checked mine, it does the same. I think that the stabilization
...
Just the Dust Removal system on start-up !!
Don't worry
Michel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hello Markus
The only old cameras use seriously, are my two Pentacon Six TL with Carl
Zeiss Jena or Schneider Kreuznach lenses.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
David,
I checked mine, it does the same. I think that the stabilization
mechanism is always on, and the switch only tells the processor to apply
it to the processed image. This makes, in my opinion, sense because you
will need less circuits to take care off. So for me is normal. What
you
we love yellow :)
a
P. J. Alling wrote:
My that's yellow. Nice detail though.
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/annsansdirectory/yellowroseatfarmmarket.jpg
super macro mode, fluorescent white balance setting, f 3.5 1/125
dark side pro-1
auto exposure
I haven't shot anything
I'm going to try it both ways when panning, just in case it will
help in the vertical without hurting in the horizontal during
horizontal panning.
That's worth a try, I had thought of it but there would need to be some kind
of intelegent system at work. Anyone got any clues?
I think I'll
You're telling me that a country (Say China, which has the most advanced
space and missile program after the 4 countries I mention) which cannot
reliably put a can with a guy in it into LEO (About 100 miles up) will
be able to hit a device the size of a large car at Geosync (22,700 or so
miles
The only issue I've run across is that you will have trouble using SR on
a tripod if bracketing for HDR rendering (Registration will be
distinctly off).
-Adam
Markus Maurer wrote:
This may be a stupid question but does SR/IS have any negative side effects?
greetings
Markus
Fine, Leica is dead.
When DCWatch first published its M8 overview, the ISO 1250+ examples
featured horrible noise.
The next day they had replaced all the ISO images with much less
noisy ones. Go figure!
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2006/11/17/5070.html
Bertil
--
PDML
- Original Message -
From: Roman
Subject: SMC-DA 10-17mm f3.5-4.5 fisheye-zoom and super macro
In technical specification closest focus distance is 14centimeters but
in Photodo forums there was posting stated that motorized AF can focus
as close as 1 inch (2.5cm). Can anyone please
John Whittingham wrote:
I think I'll have a look in the manual later.
When all else fails, read the destructions.
:-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Nov 26, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
This is NOT the way
for Leica to deal with what are essentially defective sensors. They
should lean on Kodak to put a proper IR cutoff filter over the
sensors and do a recall on cameras already sold for sensor
Peter Lacus wrote:
Amita Guha wrote:
to be repaired for free. But to solve the problem of above average IR
sensitivity,, you have to use a special IR filter on every lens. They
are providing two for free in any size the user wants.
I don't understand this fuss about such minor thing.
No, that's cat people, they'd freak if there was a dog there...
Peter Fairweather wrote:
Well the cat represents a severe health and safety issue. Would you be
happy to see such a scene in a resaurant kitchen?
I suppose that's Nikon owners for you!!!
Best wishes
Peter
--
PDML
I got a bit curious and read a few reviews. Before we consign Leica to
the ash bin of history we should read the meia culpa at the end of this
review.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/leica-m8.shtml
Bob W wrote:
Subject: Re: OT: Leica's M8 fixes
That's not an
I think that was their original plan.
Peter Lacus wrote:
Amita Guha wrote:
to be repaired for free. But to solve the problem of above average IR
sensitivity,, you have to use a special IR filter on every lens. They
are providing two for free in any size the user wants.
I don't
Don't even ask what happens if you take the camera into orbit.
Only you would have that experience...
Cotty wrote:
On 25/11/06, Brendan MacRae, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anyone else have some internal shifting about
when turning your K10D from landscape to horizontal?
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell
Subject: Re: OT: Leica's M8 fixes
Make Kodak pick up the tab. It's their fault. They knew what these
sensors would be used for. Besides, they have deeper pockets than
Leica.
It sounds like Leica made a questionable decision regarding the IR
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.8 85mm
On 25/11/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am avoiding looking through the viewfinder of an inlens IS system
for
this very reason.
I made that mistake and look what happened to me
Lost yer hair,
Not a problem if you use Pentax TCs. They apparently don't transmit
focal length information. I don't know about third party TCs though.
The only third party TC's I've got experience with on Pentax are K mount.
John Whittingham wrote:
Hi Adam
The K100D does not permit you to override
Amita
Apologies, on reflection the chef is dealing with the cooked meat
before the raw meat which is safer. Unusual to have the cat for
dessert rather than as a starter though!!
On 11/26/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, that's cat people, they'd freak if there was a dog there...
Can you turn the Pentax SR on and off on each axis
separately or is it xy both on / xy both off.?
It would be better if you could choose only the axes
you wanted SR on...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Doug Franklin
Sent: Sunday,
You can buy a *ist-D new today for $799, from BH photo. so lets see
799/1699 * 100 ~ 47% so my guess is that you'll be able to buy a K10D
for ~$470 just after it's discontinued. Other than that, as the
official Pentax price never fell much below $1699 I have no clue.
Past history is no
On 26/11/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/vfr.jpg
:-P
That attractive black carry case has a nasty white thing stuck to the
underside.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 26/11/06, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Don't even ask what happens if you take the camera into orbit.
Only you would have that experience...
I wish Peter. I wish.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
