On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
> Other names from the distance past:
>
[...]
> Bob Shell. We all know where he is. Wonder if he gets internet rights.
I did not know that Shell was here, though I knew of the case from the
news. That was a fascinating and horrifying Google.
htt
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
>> On 5 Mar 2017, at 12:42, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>>
>> On 4/3/17, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> I took Cotty's advice -- while ignoring Bob W's :)
>>
>> I can re
rted to BW ...
>
> ann
>
>
>
> On 3/5/2017 7:53 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5 Mar 2017, at 12:42, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/3/17, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>>
>>>> Things I see by stopping and lo
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 4/3/17, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>https://medium.com/@bruce.walker/at-my-feet-b151de7b4eeb
>>
>>This is Fujifilm content -- sorry Pentax.
>
> Interesting. I found all the images rather lo
Lovely! And a welcome sign of spring too. :)
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Spring has sprung. My snowdrops bloomed today, affording me an opportunity to
> use the D FA 100/2.8 macro that I bought after my Series 1 90/2.5 was
> apparently pilfered by the guys who pai
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 4:22 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>> On 05 March 2017 at 17:05 Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Switching between Yahoo and Earthlink is kind of like alternating
>> between "frying pan" and "fire".
>
> That's a Mark! on so many levels.
As is that. Meta-Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
Lightroom and Photoshop
(including Elements).
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Alan, I suspect that your negatives have aged and the colour cast
> you're seeing is also inconsistent across the image.
>
> Just for grins I downloaded that image and tried
Alan, I suspect that your negatives have aged and the colour cast
you're seeing is also inconsistent across the image.
Just for grins I downloaded that image and tried two correction
methods in Photoshop.
One technique is really simple and quick but is meant for more subtle
casts and seems to sub
le.
>
> Don't know if that would help for Earthlink, because the outgoing smtp
> server is the same one I'm already using that's getting RBL problems
> from "Spam Eating Monkey".
>
> On 3/4/2017 2:35 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> I have used Gmai
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
>>Thank goodness I'm not the sort of dreadful person who says "Told you so!".
>
> What sort of dreadful person are you?
The _other_ one; you know.
Also, the sort that tells you truths which you would rather not hear.
--
Cute, and an unusual angle too, but it works.
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> One more from this afternoon’s bird shoot.
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18359775/goldfinch-in-winter-dress
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listin
Things I see by stopping and looking down; a short essay.
https://medium.com/@bruce.walker/at-my-feet-b151de7b4eeb
This is Fujifilm content -- sorry Pentax.
I took Cotty's advice -- while ignoring Bob W's :) -- and got my wife
to gift me a (barely used) Fuji X20 at Christmas. It's a pretty nice
I have used Gmail for 15 years or so now after I got a very early
invite. They have a very good handle on spam avoidance, their servers
are solid and they do know what they are doing. Consider that some of
the folks who wrote the original specs for the Internet work there.
And some of the original
A good warning for life in general.
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
> I was thinking about Ann's love to signs, when I saw this one:
> http://42graphy.org/misc/2017-02-Utah/ExpectUnmarkedHazards-IR-1090974.jpg
>
> I couldn't find a sign: "Expect no signs for unmarked haz
Try a gel on the strobe then, red or green.
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> What strikes me in all these shots is that the light on the tree
>> doesn't relate back to the sign in any of them. There's just no
What strikes me in all these shots is that the light on the tree
doesn't relate back to the sign in any of them. There's just no
connection, and they just don't work for me. The darkest tree ones
_almost_ do, which leads to ...
I would try one more thing. Try an HDR bracketing where at one end you
Mark, LED panels sold for video use should not flicker.
Have you tried CFLs yet? They /may/ not flicker because of the decay
time in the fluorescent coating.
Perhaps rearrange your schedule to shoot during the day and use sunlight? :)
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Mark C wrote:
> A couple th
lding on the far left -- just think it looks
> better without the tall dark blob on the right... how much that has to do
> with
> the monitor I'm on versus yours, Bruce, but the little skiiers and the
> platform and wires are context enough for me - the building on the right
> i
Gorgeous view. Ready to be a great social media banner. :)
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> For those who prefer sunny sky over gloomy one, here is another
> panorama, - from another mountain near Salt Lake City, - Brighton ski
> resort:
> http://42graphy.org/misc/2017-02
I concur. If you are up against time constraints then simply restrain
yourself until you have a few minutes to select a couple of the
strongest shots. Dump-and-run is not a winning strategy. :)
Otherwise it's a bit like: hey guys, here's a large pile of random
pixels (300 million). I am under a ti
I like the entire panorama, Igor. The structures on both sides frame
it and give it context. I'd leave them in, myself.
But I'm afraid it seems to lack detail and clarity to me. Taken
handheld, perhaps? Was it misty up there?
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
> Here is a
stapled
> it to a couple old 16 x 20 wooden frames - basically a DYI diffuser. I wish
> I had hung onto them - tossed them when purging the house of excess stuff.
>
>
> On 2/28/2017 6:34 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Mark, here's an alternate diffusion suggestion: wh
hes, but need continuous light to take advantage of
> pixel shift.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 2/28/2017 11:29 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> I agree that tungsten bulbs are generally quite good for faithful
>> colour, and it's easy to colour correct for them.
&
A reference to THHGttG (Douglas Adams) where it is the answer to life,
the universe and everything. Trouble is nobody knows what the question
is, so it's kind of useless.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42_(number)#The_Hitchhiker.27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy
As to why that's ironic in this context, well
common bayonet base tungsten halogen lamps with a 40
degree beam spread are great if you are lighting up close, like for
macro.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Mark C wrote:
> Thanks, Bruce. I'm not trying for exact color reproduction but just want
> consistent results and reasonably
Whether you need to worry about CRI or not depends on how fussy you
are. If you are shooting products (including fashion) for a living you
would (or should, anyway) be fussy and CRI is critical. Also if you
shoot people and like your skin tones to be well rendered, or natural.
So if you find that
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> As for smartphone annoyances, I basically ignore any updates. If an app
> works the way I want, I leave it alone.
I find that's critical. If you let the phone update, not only do apps
change in annoying ways, but each update takes more and
Are you quite certain the vignetting isn't from a decreasing image
circle as you zoom out?
I don't know one way or the other, but if you cut the hood and
discover that doesn't fix the problem, you'll be mighty pissed. :)
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Jos de Fotograaf
wrote:
> I have the Sigm
It's really too bad that there isn't some part of the Internet made
out of metal and wood, like vintage cameras. Stuff that is well built
and made to last, that you learn how to use and then they become
automatic in your hands.
The older I get, the more I agree with your complaint, PJ.
btw, I as
t; thinking: hmm I should take this core memory and keep it as a memento,
> but alas, I did not. Now I wish I had. It was art.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> I find it's a Really Bad Idea to keep these vintage computing
>> anecdotes in m
I find it's a Really Bad Idea to keep these vintage computing
anecdotes in mind, though. All that does is hamper you when you are
deciding how to accomplish many computing tasks. If you keep on
thinking that 400 megabytes is enormous, you will miss opportunities
like stacking multiple images.
I re
That looks like a very fun event, Rob. I dipped randomly into that
gallery and enjoyed all the shots I saw.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I don't get much time to hang out here these days but I'm still
> shooting Pentax for the moment, two K3's and a K5iis.
I agree with your assessment, John. The remote server which is using
the RBL blacklist appears to be cloud6.emwd.com, run by Emerging
Markets Web Design LLC., and I assume that the pdml list handling is
hosted there.
Those RBL things are a very stupid blunt instrument. Better anti-spam
systems eit
Google translate offered this puzzler:
"- K mount mounted, covering image circle of 35 milf size image sensor"
Dare I suggest they are targeting shooters of middle aged women?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Bill wrote:
> http://news.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/rim_info/2017/20170222_014592.html
>
>
Fabulous colour!
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> SIGH!
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18355681/Orchid
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Bruce Walker
> wrote:
>
>
Also link.not . :)
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> I am still struggling with Photo.not. The new site is quite attractive,
> but so far I find it more cumbersome to upload images and provide links to
> images. The is therefore partly in the nature of a test of my abi
This is a great read. Red filter == winner!
https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-photograph-made-ansel-adams-famous
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Looks pretty fine, Gonz.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Gonz wrote:
> Some kind of reddish finch at our bird feeder (I'm not a bird
> expert). Playing around with the K-1 and A* 300 with the 1.4x rear
> converter. Forgot to change the setting on the RAW type so it saved
> them in PEF format
The bigger the project (and so the creative team), the more
responsibilities may get delegated away from the photographer. It has
always been so. Just like on movie sets.
I have done set design for another photographer from time to time.
They seem to like what I can do with minimal crap lying arou
My old 2007-era iMacs (still running two of them) have two slots but
for weird hardware reasons can take a 4G SIMM in one slot and a 2G
SIMM in the other for a total of 6G RAM -- the upper limit. Sp Larry's
guess is a reasonable one.
That's what I found out with OWC docs and did the upgrade succes
A fold-out. I'd submit something for that. ;)
You don't see those too often these days, but it's definitely a
feature that online viewing can't match. I have a great early book by
Herb Ritts with both single and double fold outs in it. The doubles
fold out from two facing pages. Perfect for a pan
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Gonz wrote:
> The missus was threatening to place the order
> herself after hearing me talk about it enough.
Awesome strategy, dude! Making note of that one.
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Great shot, Paul. Sharpness, detail and light excellent. They are
darned hard to catch so I just don't bother. :)
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Today was Chikadee day in my backyard. Not a finch, sparrow or junko in
> sight. Odd. Chikadees keep me on my toes. They rare
Yup, it showed up for me. Nice! Contrast seems a little flat, but well
detailed, Paul.
I see that photo.net has suddenly leapt ahead two decades in web
design to the trendy 2016-era. :) Though their navigation is broken: I
could arrow-right through your shots, but arrow-left got stuck on one
image
Go on. You know you want to ...
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:56 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> No, I mustn't say it, no, nope, no. Just not... (Bites tongue).
>
>
>
> On 2/2/2017 9:14 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vrXKlO2Jbw
>>
>
Very film-like atmosphere, I think. Nice!
It's amazing how much you have to crank the ISO to get something like
ASA 1600 of back-in-the-day. :)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Shot pool night again yesterday. As usual, my favorite was more a portrait
> than a pool shoote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vrXKlO2Jbw
Ah, Larry. You never fail to make me go, "wh?"
:)
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> My contribution to the Rear End theme. You were expecting this, no? :)
>
it didn't offend my sensibilities, it's just that in
>> a shared-office environment I have to be much more circumspect about what I
>> splash across the big displays. Something about wanting to keep my job and
>> all... :-)
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 a
Thanks, John. :)
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:38 PM, John wrote:
> No problems here.
>
>
> On 1/31/2017 3:20 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Sorry if that caused problems for you folks. I figured it was no more
>> provocative than underwear adverts in supermarket checko
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Bruce Walker
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry if that caused problems for you folks.
>
>
> I thought it quite modest, actually.
I appreciate that, Dan. So did I, but then I'm ap
You have all of February to procrastinate, too. :)
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I can't remember the due date for submissions to the annual. Since there
> hasn't been a lot of chatter, I don't think it's today, but if I'm wrong, I
> doubt that I'm the only one making th
ote:
>
>> Ain't nothing "suboptimal" about that frame!
>>
>> On 1/30/2017 10:29 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>>> My contribution to the Rear End theme. You were expecting this, no? :)
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_wal
Thank you, Paul. :)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I was hoping. Very nice. I'm a big fan of little bottoms.
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 10:29 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> My contribution to the Rear End
My contribution to the Rear End theme. You were expecting this, no? :)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/32466533372/lightbox/
This is an outtake from my shoot with Denisa Strakova, but despite
suboptimal framing I still like the shot, so it's a keeper. :)
645z, dfa645 90mm f:2.8, f/4
I like that very much, Ken.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Taken awhile back with a PZ1P, 200mm f4.0 SMC A* ED Macro and Velvia
>
> In the Upper Peninsula of Michigan on a very cold frosty fall early fall
> morning.
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/phot
That's an impressive bird, Alan. Nicely detailed.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Alan C wrote:
> It was heavily overcast with light rain for most of the weekend. poor light,
> unfortunately. The veld is now in good condition, rivers are flowing & dams
> are filling up. Everyone was happy exce
For me all their goodwill evaporated when I installed an earlier free
trial and it screwed up my Adobe applications so thoroughly I was
forced to delete and reinstall both Lightroom and Photoshop to get rid
of it. Wouldn't touch their plugins now.
Try the free Nik suite, P.J.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017
That looks like a good one, Gonz.
One of my treasured books is Gregory Heisler: 50 Portraits. In this
you see the final (usually cover) shots, the alternate takes, plus a
story behind the taking of each one, and some technical analysis. In
some case the story is of a fail. Heisler managed to get h
>From my experience, the K-3 is an excellent studio camera. The KP
doesn't even have X mode on the dial, and they left off the X-sync
socket.
It only accepts a single HDXC card.
Missing lots of handy controls off the back. No top info LCD. But it
has a dial position for HDR. Retch. Why not one fo
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
>> more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg
>
> Thanks. Weird. Looks like fabric. I’ll be interested i
I must check into those. Thanks, Zos. :)
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> They make gloves that work with smart phones. I have a pair. It is
> cumbersome but better than freezing.
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> Yeah.
Yeah. Ever pulled out a smartphone in the dead of winter when it's
-15C with a -25C windchill and tried to use the touch screen? After
you pull off your gloves and your fingers start to freeze you discover
that dry skin fails to register.
Give me buttons and dials.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:04
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 24/1/17, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Fortunately I was able to rescue it with a serious application of
>>curves and cloning from another shot in the set.
>
> We all know about your curves appli
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> All this debate on the merits of cropping, you might as well debate using
> zoom lenses rather than primes, DSLRs rather than 8x10 view cameras with
> glass plates, or hiring models.
Hang on there, Larry: you've been here about as long as I
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 24/1/17, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Eric, everybody crops ...
>
> Bruce has been known to crop so heavily that he's even had complaints
> from the PPA (Pixel Peeper's Association). Appare
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Also, there are different exposure methodologies. [...]
> If you're shooting raw, then you generally want to "expose
> to the right", in order to preserve the highlights,
Come again? ETTR actually endangers highlights. It's the shadows tha
Eric, everybody crops ...
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2013/06/06/the-extraordinary-story-behind-the-iconic-image-of-che-guevara
Crop 'till you drop.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> I crop often. Sometimes radically. To focus more clearly on what interests me
> i
That's pretty darned gorgeous, Mark.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> From a few years back when we went on a walk with Cotty near Oxford.
>
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Penta
My two year old iMac 5K is handling 50 Mpx 645z raw files just fine,
P.J. And I stack up a lot of layers in Ps when I'm retouching; no
slowdowns there either. Editing is zippy and painless.
Consumer desktop, 50+ megapixels, no issues.
Re unlimited budget: this Fuji and 2 lenses, or the 645Z and 2
Me too. I'm planning to go and see/fondle one. I need to see if the VF
is any good.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/news/fujifilm-officially-unveils-gfx-medium-format-system?BI=4906
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> P
That's a wonderful shot, Hank.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
> Yesterday the fog produced a nice white cover at the sub zero celcius
> temperature.
> Here a pic of the semi wild horses in our dunes.
> On Flickr: https://goo.gl/qMjkik
>
> Henk
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss M
That's a lovely study, Paul.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I’m back at the pool hall for the annual tournament, and I’ve just started
> rendering tonights pics. But I’ve fallen in love with this one. This is
> Julie Katz, a hairdresser and lovely lady. Her backside
But happy news for animals.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:11 AM, John wrote:
> Ringling Brothers Circus is closing down this morning.
>
> http://www.voanews.com/a/ringling-brothers-circus-to-end/3676886.html
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must nev
Ditto what Jack said, Ken.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> This is as nicely put together as it
> can be done, Ken!
>
> J
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:55 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>> Taken awhile back on Velvia
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?phot
Those are both wonderful shots, Rick. Really reveals the mood and
ambiance of the place.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329266&size=lg
>
> Closer:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329267
>
> (K-5, DA 16-45)
>
> Comments
It's amazing. Does it have a perfume, Dave?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:28 PM, David Mann wrote:
> Our Xmas lily is blooming. Here are two views about 90° apart. There are
> still a few unopened buds but there are plenty to keep the bees busy.
>
> http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1035/#peso
>
>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> [...] if/when I decide to revisit APS-C, I would absolutely definitely choose
> K-3 over K-3ii.
>
> [...] the K-3ii ditches the pop-up flash
> [...] I have yet to see a reliable add-on I can use to trigger external
> Pentax flashes.
Inexpe
This has an appealingly elegant form and composition. A very beautiful
image, Ken.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
> K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329773
>
> Comments ap
I agree they were really under-valuing that lens.
I just did a quick eBay search and the cheapest da* 16-50 on offer was
$450 US. The rest averaged around $600 and many were much higher than
that.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Charles Robinson
wrote:
> I agree about profit and overhead but s
Wow! I didn't know you could get an LBA shot.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Mark C wrote:
> I considered getting one of those but after thinking it over decided not to
> - I can't see what niche it would fill.
>
> The infinity to 2:1 sounds ideal for a field macro lens where you might want
> ot
Male and clothed, oh my! First shots taken in a studio for 2017.
Subject was handy: Peter, the studio owner.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/32121777225/lightbox/
K-3, DA* 55/1.4, f/4, 1/60th sec, 400 ISO.
Strobe with 5' gridded stripbox, camera right.
Post in Lightroom 4.4.
Hey Ri
Done! :)
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Send us your photos for the 2017 Book
> http://www.robertstech.com/pdmlbook/upload.php
>
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http:/
Some excellent shots in there, Larry. My faves are "swing dance
tonight" and that panoramic landscape of a rolling hill under the
starry sky.
Unsolicited 2017 resolution for you: begin captioning your better shots. :)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> I made a quick pass t
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:50 PM, John wrote:
>
> On 12/30/2016 7:35 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>
>>> Bruce Walker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And yeah, I hear you on the loss of the red hair
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2016, at 17:46, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> And yeah, I hear you on the loss of the red hair. She's a gorgeous
>> ginger. But that's the price I gotta pay for being a b&w hipster.
>
> If you we
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> And yeah, I hear you on the loss of the red hair. She's a gorgeous
>> ginger. But that's the price I gotta pay for being a b&w hipster.
>
> That, flannel shirts and tw
I like it! Perfect title too.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Pentax K-1 with A 50/1.2, F 1.2 @ 1/500th, ISO 2500
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18327623&size=lg
>
> Part of an experiment to see if I can still focus manually in relatively low
> light. I did
ou on the loss of the red hair. She's a gorgeous
ginger. But that's the price I gotta pay for being a b&w hipster.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much, Bulent. I am really coming to understan
Dave, I can recommend these guys: OWC https://www.macsales.com/
USA based, but fast shipping. They have tutorials with model-specific
instructions on what to buy. And they accept trade-ins of RAM you pull
out to replace. (Or they did anyway; check that.)
I maxed-out a 2007 iMac with 6GB RAM and a
I need more musical instruments for props. :)
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 1:19 PM, John wrote:
> I guess she could be playing a marimba.
>
> On 12/28/2016 9:10 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Should she be doing something with her feet too? Maybe you just take
>> reading and
Dec 29, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Bulent Celasun
wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> I clicked on the image and it got bigger, as expected :)
>
> And, I have seen the central part of the vertical (portrait format) image
> filling my horizontal (landscape format) monitor.
>
> I guess you have alr
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I had another go at shooting the covered bridge at night. I took care to
> get there earlier tonight, and the lights went off about twenty minutes
> earlier than last night.
They're watching from a hide, with their hands on the light switch.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 12/21/2016 9:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>>
>> 90% SFW. There's a sliver of nippl
ann sanfedele wrote:
>>
>> Nice shot, but don't think it is multitasking
>>
>> ann
>>
>>
>>> On 12/21/2016 10:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>> It's coffee o'clock ...
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_
Appreciated, Ken!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Great subject/pose, very nice lighting... What's not to like?
>
>
> -Original Message-----
>>From: Bruce Walker
>>Subject: PESO - Multitasking
>>
>>It's coffee
Down, boy! :)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> I think I could help her multitask more. ;)
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/314011539
On 12/21/2016 10:03 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>>
>> 90% SFW. There's a sliver of nipple, but it's in b&w so that makes it
>> safe enou
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 21/12/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>It's coffee o'clock ...
>>
>>https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/31401153970/lightbox/
>>
>>90% SFW. There's a sliver
e real "boobs" though!
>
> On 12/28/2016 4:01 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Inspired by Marc LaGrange, and maybe a bit cheesy, but what the heck.
>>
>> This one's in colour, and is solidly NSFW because boobs.
>>
>> http://portfolio.brucemwalker.com/
Thank you, Dave!
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:31 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> nice lighting and pose
>
> Dave
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>> Inspired by Marc LaGrange, and maybe a bit cheesy, but what the heck.
>>
>> This one's
501 - 600 of 15591 matches
Mail list logo
