I've been in a similar situation a few months ago -- trying to take a pic of a new
bridge. I have a very strong opinion on current "security measures" as well as people
feeding public histeria (Russians/Arab Terrorists/Green Monsters Are Coming!).
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: gfen
I would be really looking forward seeing Rollei making an AF 600x -- there've been
rumours about this for quite some time.
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:26:12 -0300
Subject: OT: Hasselblad 645 autofocus
>
>
> Hasselb
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
> I've heard English and Russian are similar in that regard...among the
> world's hardest languages!
Mishka
Alright, it's been a fairly short wait ;)
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:01:30 -0400
Subject: RE: Looking Pro
>
> I have to keep this in mind for Halloween and my
"dead" system means exactly what? Does it fulfill your needs? If it does, (unless you
are a professional, making money with it) does it matter whether pentax (or whoever)
releases anything at all in the next 100 years, as long as *your* equipment can be
serviced? is there something *particular*
Viv. Series1 105/2.5 macro is the same as Kiron 105/2.5, goes to 1:1. It's an
outstanding lens, very well built (quite heavy though) and very sharp. The focussing
is the "wrong" way. They seem to sell for ~$150 mint on ebay.
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: kelvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Anthony,
I am relatively new here, but so far I have heard a lot less "clangers" from Bruce
than from some of the loyal pentaxians here. And I haven't heard him insulting or
aggravating pentax users -- but unfortunately, many here take almost everything
personaly.
Best,
Mishka
-Original M
Brand loyalty is nonsense. Corporations have a single loyalty (at best): their
stockholders.
And as far as Pentax goes -- so far I haven't seen an alternative to LX (lightweight,
sealed, -6EV meter, interchangeable finders, etc...). If Nikon comes up with one, at
comparable prices -- I would s
It definitely brings a smile to my face. Man, I hope they *don't* come with a dslr for
another coupe of years...
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
> I guess that soon after Photokina we'll
> see on ebay an avala
iirc, with the back open, you rotate the film counter (push on it's top with your
finger, and rotate) until it reaches zero. then you close the back (keeping the
counter at zero). they you can dry-fire.
mishka
-Original Message-
From: "wendy beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROT
-Original Message-
From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 10:13:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: OT: A warning about Aaron and the Brotherhood
> Looks like the brotherhood is not only alive and well
> but have started assimilating many since I saw
Considering the fact that Adorama sells the next, waterproof version, for something
like $180 -- I am not terribly surprised seeing Cameraland prices.
But as far as msrp goes -- I have no idea, but "wow!".
Best,
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Have anyone had any experience with those? Specifically, I am interested in PCF V
20x60, which seem to be available for circa $139 from Cameraland.
Also, anyone has dealt with this merchant?
Best,
Mishka
KEH.com is a good guide: look at their retail prices and ask them for an instant
online quote as if you were selling.
I would pay anything under $100 for M50/1.4 in LN condition.
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 1
Collin,
Since I am experimenting with a similar setup now, would you share your experience(s)
with off-camera slave? I am
really curious about what and when and how goes wrong with it.
Mest,
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why not trigger an external flash(-es) with the built in one (+ an optical slave)?
Of course, it won't do TTL. But with a digital camera it should be a matter of a 1-2
trial shots to get the light
exactly righ, most likely, better than what film based cameras can do with all their
fancy TTL mo
Holly... ! If they hold up to their promise... Do I hear 10MP digital LX?
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:32:11 +0100
Subject: Silicon Film is still alive... (??)
>
> Not too sure myself, but from
I had a few similar experiences. The worst is MF equipment: no matter what you say,
you are assumed to be a
professional, with strong (negative) attention of business owners, security personel
etc.
Once I wanted to take a pic of one of the building of Polaroid offices here, from a
parking lot
kinda feels good looking at cameras built back when "the men were the real men", etc
(including those furry green
creatures from a-centauri). transmitting exact aperture in infinitesimal increments
with any lens. kinda like LX.
man, I love the progress! :)
Mishka
-Original Message-
Fr
Nah.. simpler: dark cloth (or, sky mask) and a BFG900. In NYC *especially*
:)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:39:13 -0400
Subject: Re[2]: Orgin Myths -- The Finale? :)
>
> Shouldn't he be using a view camera with
Rob,
Do I have to state the obvious? Of course we want Pentax (or any other manufacturer
for that matter) to make a flagship
product, that would never become obsolete, or, for really finicky, would be 100%
upgradeable over internet for free
(including body mods), switch between digital and film
KEH is quite a bit overpriced (point in case: it lists a BGN M85/2 for $40 more than I
had to pay for an EX+ one at
Adorama!) -- I suppose it's for those who need something right away. It's wholesale
price ("online quote") usually
gives a better estimate of what one should pay for a given item.
Well, one gan get M f/3.5 for around $50 and K f/2.5 $100 (that's pretty much what I
have paid recently for these), so,
"quite a bit more" depends on how you calculate: on one hand, it's twice as much;
otoh, its only $50 extra.
However 3.5 and 2.5 are *very* different beasts: one is slow, small
I can't believe I wrote this... of course I meant 50MP at... probably the same measly
$50K
-Original Message-
From: "Mike Ignatiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 23:25:25 +0400
Subject: Re[2]: photokina rumors
>
> If tru
If true, that's one hell of a way to boost the resolution. Especially if it scales up
for larger sizes (just imagine:
144MP full frame sensor for 6x6 Hassy for mere $50K...)
Best,
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
M40/2.8 (for MX -- this is a killer combo)
A50/1.7 (can't live with this one)
A50/1.2 (lust -- besides, won't have another chance :)
basically, what I have right now, except M50/1.4 instead of A50/1.2
Mishka
Cotty,
Not sure if the previous my message go through (I had a server problem), but thanks
for the offer; I would love to have
it.
Best,
Mishka
I am looking for an advice on those. Something reliable and inexpensive. My flashes
are Sunpak 522 and Vivitars 283 and
550 and I am curious to experiment with off camera setups.
Best,
Mishka
Liked the "carefully packed" part :)
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: "David P. Chernicoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 10:50:27 -0400
Subject: What to do when someone steals your images for ebay
>
> Hopefully the idiot who posted the auction hasn't
I use a VS1 105/2.5 and find it superb in build and optical quality(and it's running
price is ~$150 on ebay). It's
manual focus, though.
-Original Message-
From: "Feroze Kistan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:58:23 +0200
Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-d
I am still trying to convince myself I can get by without one for Nikon4000. And it's
quite a bit less. Why, oh why,
did you have to bring this up on the list?..
Mishka
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 07:58:15 -0400
the *density* of pixels is limited by current technology. otherwise there would have
been dozens of 100MP digicams
everywhere, with 1mm sensors, right?
so, unless the manufacturers are trying to lower the pixel count on purpose (e.g. to
increase the light
sensitivity/lower noise), the larger si
...if those were only legal in my state...
> Anyone trying to make a case for Pentax coming out
> with a new high end body and line of lenses is a
> strong candidate for psychotropic drugs.
B.Gates... hm... who could have thought.
btw, man, believe it or not, Windows does suck!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B. Gates)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:07:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Unsubscribe, Thanks for help.
>
> Always appreciative; Bruce.
>
>
>
Just spotted one in a CVS dowstairs. Looks like... well, applied scifi. You
insert a roll of film, in 10 minutes it develops the negs and then you can
print it, you can get the scanned CD.
Almost wanted to try it, until... "to ensure your privacy, your negatives will
be delivered on a CD, and th
AFAIK, p67 is used mostly in field.
assuming this is so, now, if one decides to lug all that glass and metal with
him (along with a big tripod), instead of 35mm gear, the reason must be (unless
the person is out there to get some fitness excercise) to get the maximum
quality on the film, short o
> I have quite a few references to photographers who have switched and as you
> most probably know there are plenty of discussions regarding the issue
however
> not all are up to date. You wonder too sometimes whether the people debating
> these issues actually have anything but theoretical exp
> I think most of these types of limitations, such as DOF, can
> be overcome by computers
unfortunately, computers cannot change the laws of physics. that is, unless you
are playing Quake :)
DOF and high (at diffraction limit) lens resolution are related. you can have
either one or the other.
I didn't mean to get into the physical media limitations.
I meant "each subsequent copy is exactly bitwise identical to the original when
read into memory from the carrier, assuming the carrier and the memory are not
corrupt, there is no magnetic storm and nuclear blasts in the vicinity... more
I'll spend a day or two in Toronto this weekend (including monday morning)
visiting friends. Any recommendation of good shops that carry used pentax
glass? You can respond me offlist to save the bandwidth.
Best,
Mishka
e[2]: Digital vs.FILM: will digital cameras lose the war?
>
> You need ICE3 - ROC can work wonders on faded slides!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Ignatiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 29 August 2002 17:19
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> &
Len,
I have no doubts that you can make 16x20 prints from 3MP camera that would kick
medium format's ass
Mishka
P.S. No, I don't have a digicam. However I have used a few, so I do have some
first hand experience.
-Original Message-
From: "Paris, Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAI
>
> You will need to constantly "mantain" your picture
> library, copy it to new
> media etc. to keep your images. This is already
> problematic for some
> formats: jpg for example loose some quality every
> time they are copied as
> far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong on this).
False.
Agree. Slides are less hassle and better contrast (I think that means, better
resolved middle tones). Prints resolve extremes better, but at the loss of
contrast and more hassle and lack of any visual reference.
Mishka.
-Original Message-
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EM
Doug,
Congratulations! For such a major move, the glitches I saw are negligible. I
was worried for a while yesterday, not being sure what's going on, but now I
see what happened and that you've done one hell of a job!
Best,
Mishka
P.S. I did take some pictures meanwhile -- that probably explains
Just got it in the mail. Boy, it is a beauty! Rock solid build, wonderful
finish... were it not that heavy, but I guess that's the price for a fast
macro. Now need to get out and shoot some pictures this weekend.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://ww
CTRL-L (levels), then click on half-shaded eye-dropper in the right corner,
then on the grey in the image.
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: Photoshop question
> > -Original Mess
http://www.theonion.com/onion3530/ebay_drunk.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Julia,
I may be not the most active ebayer here, but I have to say, it seems to be
*the* place to look for equipment. Most of my photo gear came from there
(LX, a bunch of lenses, a 6x7...). The general rule -- get in touch with the
seller. If he's the guys who ignores questions -- forget about hi
Julia,
I may be not the most active ebayer here, but I have to say, it seems to be
*the* place to look for equipment. Most of my photo gear came from there
(LX, a bunch of lenses, a 6x7...). The general rule -- get in touch with the
seller. If he's the guys who ignores questions -- forget about hi
ooops... that is so true.
i guess, what made it look square is all the photoshop toolboxes i put on
one side ;)
> From: "Bob Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Medium Format - To Pentax or not to Pentax.
>
> Did you know that the aspect ratio on your monitor is the same as 645?
>
> Bob
-
Th
will this work?
-
From: Rick Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Nikon F3 & linear polarizer. Okay combo??
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
I've read several places that the F-1 and FTb have a problem with linear
polarizers. A quick experiment will probably see how
I have an M version, which is probably the same thing, and I like it a lot.
It is a really nice lightweight and inexpensive (I believe you can get one
on ebay for $80 in excellent shape) travel lens. Last fall I took it with me
to California on vacation, and was very happy with the results.
Hope i
c'mon! we all know now that the going price for LX (minus CLA) is $30!
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:14:26PM +0200, ?ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
> > 1. For $500 you could get an LX (i.e. if you really tried hard), and I
think
>
> I thought they went on ebay for around $450. Or are those ones in need
>
The main thing fm3a has that I really miss from my LX is 1/250 flash sync.
And the warranty.
Still one sweet camera.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://
sheesh... i'm shooting a few rolls of b&w neg and slide this week,
and i'm really pleased with how easy it is to use. i don't have to
fiddle much with pouring hot gelatine over the plates and preparing
silver nitrate solutions... i just put a roll of film inside and shoot.
Please don't take thi
...resistance is futile. you *will* be assimilated -- join the collective
(...eh... i meant, brotherhood) and shoot happily ever after
> From: frank theriault
> Subject: Re: Recommendations
>
> As for bodies, just remember: the LX is the God of Manual Focus 35mm
slr's.
> And the 67 (formerly the
Tamron Adaptall and T
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
SMCA 35/2
SMCA 24/2.8
Both absolutely gorgeous, together with shades, now I know what I am doing
this weekend.
Oh no! God! I have to pick between 6x7 and LX -- I thought I had once a
nightmare like this...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.
I have recently tried to get quotes for film advance repair for 6x7. KEH
quoted me $135 + $15 s/h (including CLA), and another place, a pentax
authorized service center -- $400 (full disassembly and overhaul).
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.p
Hobby. And I intend to keep it this way.
No way am I spending all this money only to end up whishing I would write
some C++ code for a change. Which would be a very likely outcome once I
start shooting for living. For me at least.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscrib
First of all, welcome here, you are in the right place!
As for your questions, I add my voice to the choir, nevermind another body,
unless you absolutely must have something zx-m doesn't. And as far as med.
format goes -- it doesn't have to be expensive. I have got myself a
Rolleicord for $180 and
> Yes, You've been put in "read only" mode, so you can't post.
Nope, the other way around. This is "write only" mode ;)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Hello and welcome!
Pentax 24/2.8 K (original) can be found on ebay for anywhere between $180
and $250 in excellent/mint- condition. I just bought an SMC-A (later)
version, effectively, for $240.
Those are reportedly superb lenses.
Best,
Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. T
I meant
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1342771578&r=0&t=0&showTu
torial=0&ed=1018273732&indexURL=0&rd=1
and
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/ebayISAPI.dll?ViewItemRedirect&item=1342771427&r=
0&t=0&showTutorial=0&ed=1018273605&indexURL=0
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
> Difficulty in getting convenient processing is one reason. Many years
> ago, when my Rolleiflex TLR was the only camera I had, I could drop film
> off at a drug store or whatever and get back machine prints of snaps and
> travel photos. Can't do that today. Maybe there are some 1-hour places
> o
With the recent discussion of Tessars/Xenars/Planars/whatnot, I guess some
folks here have quite a bit experience with TLRs.
Does anyone know how difficult is to change on on a 'cord Va (viewving hood
is "nonremovable' -- held in place by a few screws). The original screen
sucks a lot -- the edges
actually, i was amazed at how good a reasonably priced MF rig can be. now,
besides a p6x7, i got myself a rolleicord tlr for well under $200, as a
rugged inexpensive travel camera giving me kick-ass pictures. for sheer
image quality per buck it's hard to beat. for non-professional use i find it
di
I second this: shoot slides!
Minilab prints make a very poor guide for improvement any of these aspects.
If you must shoot negatives -- scan them with a slide scanner. Otherwise do
slides. They
1. give you very precise feedback about whether you meter correctly or not.
the same goes for accurate c
ooops...
the prices are in pounds... silly me, should have set the encoding
correctly.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Ignatiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:46 PM
Subject: 67II prices in UK
> http://www.robertwhit
http://www.robertwhite.co.uk/pentax.htm
That looks like half of what B&H quotes. Am I missing something?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.o
sure, in a perfect world.
in reality NONE of browsers handles w3c standards 100%, and every one has
it's own non-standard extensions. msie is a "de-facto" standard, which
doesn't make it more compliant than, say, opera or konqueror
this is something i run into every single day: none of c++ compi
To the brothers:
I just received a quote for film transport repair from ApexPhoto (Pentax
authorized service) and KEH.
KEH states $135 and Apex -- $400 (US dollars). Any idea what the reasonable
price for this kind of repair is?
I appreciate any input.
Mishka
-
This message is from the Pentax-Dis
Boston, MA, USA
Since I am still evaluating the camera, I am now curios how serious this
problem may be and what is more practical: fixing it or return this one and
get another, without these symptoms.
> Mike, where are you located?
>
> William Robb
>
> > > Unfortunately, it is all to common with
> > Now the questions.
> > I found the spacing between the frames varies from 3mm to 7mm
> > on extremes. Is that normal?
>
> Unfortunately, it is all to common with the 6x7, especially if
> it has been abused with T-Max film.
> Think about getting the film transport overhauled. Eventually,
> the
I have bought my gear very recently, so for me this question is not really a
"what-if". The story goes like this: I had my all manual Zenit SLR and it
was pain in the ass. Big. Heavy. Very limited range of speeds. Pain to load
(as bad as 6x7). And at that time ebay wasn't there yet, and Takumars w
thanx for the warm welcome to the brotherhood! i also appreciate all the
pointers.
I just realized that I was asking to much from the focusing screen. I have
f/1.4 lens on LX and f/2.4 on 6x7 -- that's more than enough to explain the
brightness difference.
> From: William Robb
> Subject: Re: 6x7
Hello brothers:
Just got the 6x7 MLU camera which I bought on ebay a couple of weeks ago. To
say the least, I am impressed. It feels so right, despite the size and
weight! The ergonomics is wonderful. The weight is quite manageable and it
is very comfortable to handhold. I am a bit disappointed w
This sturday I am going on my (long deserved) vacation to St Petersburg,
Russia (just when I thought I am sick of winter, I am flying north...) along
with my LX and quite a few rolls of Provia 100F...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net a
Actually, I wouldn't say this guy is stealing, since he does keep the
copyright info on the image.
A different question if whether Boz's copyright allows this kind of usage.
If not, he should probably complain to ebay (although I am not sure how
effective that would be)
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 1
I have Mir 20/2.5
It's big (the front cap has ~82mm diameter, the filters get in the rear
and you cannot use them with ME-Super. My LX is fine with them though)
and heavy. The build is a bit rough -- a far cry from those smooth
Pentax lenses, but it's all metal construction (maybe except the
focus
I have Mir 20/2.5
It's big (the front cap has ~82mm diameter, the filters get in the rear
and you cannot use them with ME-Super. My LX is fine with them though)
and heavy. The build is a bit rough -- a far cry from those smooth
Pentax lenses, but it's all metal construction (maybe except the
focus
> - - Original Message -
> From: Mike Ignatiev
> Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-digest V1 #2292
>
>
> > Yeah, I know. What I meant is it seems like it was rather a norm back
> > in 80s (not that I remeber that that well) to make interchangeable
> > finders o
Yeah, I know. What I meant is it seems like it was rather a norm back
in 80s (not that I remeber that that well) to make interchangeable
finders on higher end cameras (OM, Nikon Fs, LX -- you name it) and it
definitely is an exception now. I don't get it. It is so damn
convenient, especially for t
My reasoning behind buying a 6x7 outfit was almost opposite: I was
getting a "lpmm" paranoia and was considering paying serious money for
the 85mm/1.4 (I have seen one on ebay lately going for $650, maybe more
now), until I realized that (1) to get the best quality out of it
tripod is definitely a
I would really want to close the subject. The way it goes now, it looks like
a trollfest. Which wasn't my original intent.
The cops were *NOT* rude or offensive in any way, all business and nothing
personal. It seemed they just tried simply to cover their asses in case I
was really up to something
I just looked at
http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/g6x7.html#Pentax67
and found this:
"TTL metering is very accurate if you take the fact that it is a 60's style
full area averaging type and is affected by all kinds of extraneous light
(It is influenced by backlight)"
So my question is, how bad i
hey guys,
what's your take on this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1338218377
i have been lusting for a bigger brother for my LX for quite some time now
and at the moment it seems like i may finally be able to afford one. i don't
know squat about 67 bodies, so all comments (on
actually, now that you have this monster along with the midget that used to
sit there before, do yourself a favor, try a dual monitor setup. if you do any
photoshop at all, it makes a world of differenece.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.
Thanks everyone for the input.
To close the story, I showed the lenses to a guy in a local store and his
opinion was that it's fungus. In both. I am returning them first thing
monday.
On an unrelated topic: today I went shooting to check out these two lenses,
to Charlestown (I live in Boston area
101 - 190 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
