The camera seem quite large. It could in fact include in-body stabilizer. If
it does this will be my first digital camera.
The 645D have the green button. It seem to mimick the K-mount cameras
interface.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, you can. If you have enough time. Pre focusing at the point where you
GUESS the athelete will be in 10 secs.
But when the action actually happends, using a 2.5 FPS camera is like
going
to Las Vegas with just 10 USD in
Dario wrote:
The supposed early announcement of the D2 (or whatever they're going to
call it) is approaching. Just a couple of days to go for the PMA to
begin...
Is this supposed to be the good one, the semi-pro thing, or is it just
another of the endless permutations of the 6Mp *istD?
P
Dario wrote:
The supposed early announcement of the D2 (or whatever they're going to call
it) is approaching. Just a couple of days to go for the PMA to begin...
REPLY:Is this supposed to be the good one, the semi-pro thing, or is it just
another of the endless permutations of the 6Mp *istD?Pål
Joseph wrote:
These lenses, if I understand correctly, are produced to meet individual
orders. I've never understood that. The metal parts have to be stamped in
advance and sitting around, don't they? Or are the metal parts hand-machined
and painted for each order? Are the optics produced when
Why is it when I open a scanned image saved as TIFF files in Photoshop the
quality is much deteriorated compared to the original scan. That is, if I
open the file in Nikon Scan 4.0 the image is great. In Photoshop sharpness
is reduced and there are noise artefacts as well.
Any idea?
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For me, the harshest environment is whale watching.
I own one of these:
http://www.zodiacmarine.com/uk/bombard/familles/fiche.cfm?num_modele=29
I use my camera equipent all summer in this boat and keep it in an ordinary
camer
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh, this is about Pentax MF stuff - as opposed to Pentax 35mm.
Why is that an issue? You want to use MF lenses for 35mm cameras or
DSLR's?
Pentax MF lenses (645) should be excellent if Pentax wants to be
compeditive
in
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
35mm lenses sharper than MF-lenses? No way. The DOF is greater due to the
smaller format. That's all.
The rest is a question of polishing glass. Of course the 35-mm lenses are
smaller, thus smaller tolerences - in order to o
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This whole thing about MF lenses being less sharp is largely mythical.
Nothing mythical about my lenses. I have the 645 - K adapter and compare the
lenses with K mount lenses of similar focal lenght on a K mount body. Both
- Original Message -
From: "jtainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But if MF lenses are less sharp than 35 mm. lenses, I wonder if existing
MF lenses will be good enough for a digital sensor? As we know, some
lenses that do well (or okay) in 35 mm. do not perform so well on APS-C.
Will 645D
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You shouldn't be scanning your negative at 360 dpi. You do want to END UP
with a ready for the printer image that's sized at 360 dpi. For example,
an 11 x 17 image area at 360 dpi would be about 72 megabytes. To arrive at
that kind of r
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Turn off fast printing if it's on. If you're using glossy paper,
don't use the "best photo" setting. Drop it to "Photo RPM" if it's an
option.
It turns out that it can be done after all. Aparently it isn't enough to
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You shouldn't be scanning your negative at 360 dpi. You do want to END UP
with a ready for the printer image that's sized at 360 dpi. For example,
an 11 x 17 image area at 360 dpi would be about 72 megabytes. To arrive at
that kind of
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you're using glossy paper,
don't use the "best photo" setting. Drop it to "Photo RPM" if it's an
option.
It won't let me do that! I can select Photo RPM. After I've pressed the OK
button and go back and check agai
Aaaargh...Just got the replacement Epson R2400 printer just to experience
that this one also give horizontal stripes (paper in portrait position),
although not as pronounced as the first one. Everything is different from
when I had the first sample: the software is new, printer driver is new, th
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wonder which body concept they finally settled on for the 645D.
It is a cross between all of them. I suggested such a cross in detail in a
post on PDML at that time. When we finally see the final body I'll dig out
my post and how cl
- Original Message -
From: "dick graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Let the speculation start now. This site thrives on second guessing
upcoming Pentax products. It seems very likely that it will be an 8 meg
camera with image stabilization, seeing that the new point & shoot A-10
offers t
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Note that the BJP article says the *645* digital is being introduced at
Photokina. 35mm-class DSLR could certainly be sooner.
Not really. The article do say that "as like the 645D, it is hoped that
these products will g
- Original Message -
From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
this is a very disppointing news.
How is it dissapointing that pentax will show a high-end body at Photokina?
Would it be better if they didn't?
I assume the camera will be competitive at the release date, not competitive
by
This is particularly interesting:
"He also predicted that Pentax would introduce a new lens range to go with
the new DSLRs: 'I can foresee us bringing out lenses of focal lengths and
maximum apertures that we haven't seen before, which is very exciting.' He
added: 'Having more lenses is quite
"
"'We showed a number of prototypes a short while ago, all of which were
conceptually based on the 645 film camera. One particular design has been
chosen, which is basically a mix between the best bits of all of them."
About the 645D. I suggested exactly such a mixture. It will be fun (for
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=315495
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
""We'll shift focus to more profitable single-lens reflex digital cameras,
to offset price declines in compact types," Urano said. Pentax plans to
raise the pace of new model intr
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Interesting analysis:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/07/19/bloomberg/sxpentax.php
This part is quite interesting:
""We'll shift focus to more profitable single-lens reflex digital cameras,
to offset price declines in
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks. Good for me then ;-) I should shortly have FA 120/4 macro then I
will look for something longer, perhaps 150-300 which you like very much.
Both these lenses are among the best in the line-up.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I was referring to the sweeping statement made in the 1st sentence... :-)
"The zoom lenses are as good or better than the primes."
The only exception I can think of is the FA 35/3.5
- Original Message -
From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pål, what about FA 45-85 that I bought? I read it is a good performer, but
I'd like to hear from you :-)
It is excellent. Pentax loaned me one for 9 months. It is significantly
better than the FA 45/2.8 except for
- Original Message -
From: "Gasha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I would like to hear about quality of zoom lens.
The zoom lenses are as good or better than the primes. All of the zooms
flare less than the FA 45/2.8 lens.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wonder if this is the same everywhere?
No
Pål
I plan to set up my own web page dedicated to my photography.
I am a novice in web page design and everything associated with it. I need
to know it all!
Any tips you may have from design, software, web page provider, selling
images over the net... whatever..will be welcomed.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just arrived: very nice 645n with FA 45-85/4.5! What a nice piece of pro
equipment. Too bad Pentax doesn't make something similar for K-mount... So
now my film photos will be rather only 6x4.5 ;-)
Digital shmigital
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll be the first to admit that Pentax moves in mysterious ways. Not
having product available for sale when people want it is a strange way to
run a business.
Pentax needs to get their act together this year. This means
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are kidding, try and buy something other than a consumer zoom, an
FA200/4
macro perhaps?
I wonder how many of the FA* 200/4 Macro they have sold. 50 perhaps?
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have to say that I'm more interested in the availability of good
second-hand lenses. In the past couple of years I've enabled myself with
all the Limiteds (bar the new DA), and 20mm, 50mm 1.4 and 1.7, 100mm 2.8
macro, 2
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Actually, there's a lot of demand for exotic Pentax glass. Have you
checked out the prices on ebay?
That doesn't mean that the demand is high. Only that the demand is higher
than the supply
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pentax still sells several film bodies. The MZ-M, *ist and MZ-70 and
MZ-50.
Sell? Well, I doubt they sell a lot. Besides, hardly anyone buy these camera
for use with 200/2.8 lenses.
A 200/2.8 isn't exactly exotic glass ei
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Exactly! And the thing is these relatively inexpensive lenses should never
be 'off the shelf' if there is a demand. Pentax shooting themselves in
the foot again. They're likely creating a continous cycle of customer
frustrat
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Either a mfr. is producing a given lens a and it's widely available for
purchase at numerous vendors, or it's been discontinued. The fact that
there have been numerous shortages and wait times to get what are
presumably lenses
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
¨
Either a mfr. is producing a given lens a and it's widely available for
purchase at numerous vendors, or it's been discontinued. The fact that
there have been numerous shortages and wait times to get what are
presumably lense
Pentax FA645 33-55/4,5.
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 9:44 AM
Subject: Which lens do you use most?
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Cou
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yep, the 31 is not exactly petite.
That depends on perspective. If it had been a Canon lens it would have been
among the most compact available in the EF mount.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patents aren't products. Realizing and optimising a sensor which is of a
different technology type and size than they have previously delivered
will
take time.
But for all we know they may already hace realized and opti
- Original Message -
From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Someone mentioned on this list that Samsung has not made the type of CCD
required for a DSLR... If this is true and they decide to start making
them now (or Pentax decides to make them, which they have shown no
intention of
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 3:30 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Financal Condition of Pentax
Pål Jensen wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They may sell to a handful of crazy Pentax enthusiasts and equipment
collectors
but beyond that who do you really expect would be interested?
Everyone who want better image quality that can be provided by a Canon and
d
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At this stage are you guessing as to the component basis of and
development
costs for the 645D or have you been privy to information direct from
Pentax
engineering sources? Also marketability is highly dependent on cost, y
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It's the timing that's crazy. Three years ago it might have swept the
board. Now, many MF users will have bought into FF Canon, or gone to
Hasselblad.
I've found the assumption that Pentax is a brand one can only switc
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This reply has to be made publicly. Why would you say such a thing knowing
full
well Pentax is off on a tangent pouring funds into a digital 645 body
which
will be extremely costly to develop and have very limited appeal
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't know. It seems crazy to you, and I have to say it seems crazy to
me, too. I am sure it would have been a good thing to have done three or
four years ago, but now it seems too late.
Whats crazy about making a cam
- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Which is what Herb has always said. Of course he guessed whether the
company would close down the loss-making division, but of course all
anyone can do about that is guess.
Closing down 50% of your business is p
Tom wrote:
I tend to sense Pentax/Samsung edging towards and being deeply entrenched in
mediocrity, or the Pentax camera division becoming Samsung altogether.
REPLY:
Highly unlikely. The Samsung deal may make Pentax able to set into
production a lot of their patented technology like image s
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think, perhaps, you should just sell your Pentax gear and buy
something that will relieve you from having to think about your
photography. You obviously don't understand how the camera works.
There is *something* in foc
- Original Message -
From: "DagT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Apart from superior image quality, reason good enough in my opinion, a
"full frame" FA D lens may be able to utilize in body image
stabilization. My guess is that IS won't work with DA lenses.
Why not?
Because the sensor is
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There would be little point in producing a 50-220 f4 when there is already
a 50-200 f4-5.6. Nor would such a lens merit the term "high performance".
Apart from superior image quality, reason good enough in my opinion, a
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Your comparison is not very well chosen, Pål.
Ther's only 1 pro dog photographer for every 1000 sports photographers.
And
he dosn't really need the speed.
I was attempting to adress the tendency of equally the needs of t
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and browse through this section:
http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=list&forum=DCForumID
81&conf=DCConfID9
or http://tinyurl.com/c8u5s
Thanks Shel. I found someone with exactly the same proble
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The main problem: Grain removal function (digital GEM) do not work with
Medium Format (work well with 35mm). I get an error message when using
this function when scanning (preview works) saying &qu
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What I'm saying is, that sports photography IS professional photography.
The same can be said about dog photography or any other kind of photography
imaginable because somebody somewhere certainly do it for a living.
Anyw
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Technically no, the first camera to do these things
was the Pentax Electrospotmatic which was similar
to but actually a different earlier model than the
ES.
Wasn't the Electro Spotmatic just the prototype of the ES?
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Sherburne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No experience to offer with this scanner in particular, but you didn't
mention the brand of scanner software. You may want to try VueScan if
you're
not using that already (http://www.hamrick.com/). You can download and
t
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
I though we were speaking of when cameras
gained both, shutter and aperture priority in both bodies.
That was Minolta with the XD-7.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: Recent thread on 85's and 77's
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen"
Subject: Re: Recent thread on 85's and
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Canon pioneered Shutter Priority Automation while Pentax was investing in
aperture priority automation, pretty much contemporary IIRC.
I think Konica pioneered shutter priority. Canon wasn't someone to be
reconed with
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Canon was the first to market a successful aperture priority AE camera,
but both Nikon and Mamiya had working (albeit crude) versions several
years before.
? When was that? The first Canon aperture priority camera
Anyone on this list using this scanner?
Some observations:
This scanner is excellent.
The MF film holder is close to useless - you need the glass holder which
incidentally cost a fortune and must be the most profitable item in the
history of manufactured goods.
The highlight/shadow adjustment
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I believe that Pentax needs to improve AF-speed in order to even begin to
compete with Canon and Nikon.
Speed - or rather - the lack of speed (not only AF, but also write
speed) -
would certainly be my main reason for cha
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Canon was next and I can't remember if Nikon beat Pentax or not.
Nikon was years behind the other four big manufacturers in the 70's
technology wise. Pentax was the first to apply aperture priority auto (ES)
and was a
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They were well behind Nikon, which had a Shutter-priority version of the
F2 in 1974 or so.
Did the F2 have shutter priority? I thought it was strictly manual
- Original Message -
From: "jtainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can anyone comment on the optical quality obtainable by combining the A
2X-L converter with a Pentax long lens?
Just as importantly, is it feasible to focus manually at F8?
Forget it. I have the 2X-L converter and have tri
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The 35-350 is a beast of a lens, as is the FA* 600/4, neither is going to
be as fast as a smaller lens, you should really pick a more reasonable
comparison than a pair of lenses that only a handful of people will ever
use. A
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pal, have you shot with a USM or AF-S lens? There's no comparison in AF
performance. USM absolutely blows screw-drive AF out of the water unless
you have either an ultra-light lens (like a 50mm) or one of the very few
camera
- Original Message -
From: "Thibouille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:34 PM
Subject: new AF system soon (when D2 arrives)?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=1807
Any thoughts?
"Reason for this is that the heavy optics
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There would be little point in producing a 50-220 f4 when there is already
a 50-200 f4-5.6. Nor would such a lens merit the term "high performance".
Huh? Why wouldn't it merit the term high performance? Performance has
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have to believe that Cal Precision gets their parts from Pentax USA. It
does, however, sound like the $137.37 was extremely low. I recently had
my
FA* 300mm F4.5 repaired for a lot more (that was a lens element, howe
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I recently called Cal Precision and asked about their replacing the
dented hood on a Pentax-A* 300mm f/2.8. After some checking, I got a
call back that the hood would be $200 and the labor would be unknown
until they had a ch
"Sorry Steve, I dont believe this is correct. Magnification should have
nothing to do with it. "
REPLY:
Magnification has everything to do with it. All IS patents I've read so far
include focal lenght data in order to function.
Magnification matters for the same reason you need a very sturd
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Schneider-Kreuznach market value must be limited indeed as 99% have never
heard about it.
Come to think of it; Schneider-Kreuznach sounds like a nasty incurable
disease!
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Samsung GX-1L?]
Joseph Tainter a écrit :
But now should we worry that
Pentax will become a Schneider-Kreuznach? A maker of things branded
u
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0810959461/ref=pe_snp_461/103-1614411-5977422?n=283155
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I do consulting work on patents. This patent was a Canon patent, but
traded to Olympus.
Are you sure? It has been very widely stated as a Minolta patent even in
litterature. Minolta actually used the patent as well in Min
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TTL OTF metering that would correct during the exposure was a Canon
patent. Surprisingly, Canon never used it in a camera but licensed it to
Olympus instead in an exchange for an Olympus patent they wanted. Such
patent s
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Nikon F3, Canon New F1 and several Olympus OM models all do TTL-OTF
ambient metering. The unique feature of the LX is that it does so down
to -6.5EV, a range which is unheard of.
No. Only the Olympus OM-2 and OM-4.
PÅ
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Note that the word "Millions" is specifically used, both in the English
and the German versions. Zeiss tends to be very precise in their choice
of words. I wonder if they have listened to countless voices and will
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You used the reference "It" and then proceeded to explain the MLU
operation. May I assume you meant "they" in that both the "N" and the
"NII" operate in a similar way?
No. The N does not have MLU in any form. MLU and mirror
- Original Message -
How is the MLU activated with the 645N and 645NII? Pre-lock or separate
lever requiring cable release?
It has both mirror lock and mirror prefire. No need to use remote releases
for either. Set via the switch around the release level. One position is
mirror p
- Original Message -
From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But anyway both 645N/NII have so greatly damped mirror, that MLU under
normal circumstances gives nothing. And that was proved by Michael
Reichmann (who loved 67II/645 a few years ago) in short test here:
http://
- Original Message -
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No it doesn't, and the 645N demonstrated that there is no difference
between using the MLU or not using it with a well damped mirror like the
one of the 645.
MLU on the 645N was only added for marketing reasons, since s
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=16312496
Maybe someone who knows more about corporate stuff can than I do can tell
us what this means.
It does mean what it says - somebody thinks Penta
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Inner Game of Outdoor Photography" is effing brilliant. Haven't read
the other one. Yet.
Then you would certainly find "vision" equally brilliant as it is exactly in
the same vein...
PÅL
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Another link: http://www.chrysis.net/photo/pentax/pentax645n.htm
One lens is missing on that page; the 150-300 ED IF zoom lens. An excellent
optic BTW.
PÅL
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll have to go to the library and find some old OP issues then.
Better read his book "Mountan light". Incidentally, his OP columns are
published in book form as "Galen Rowell's Vision: The Art of Adventure
Photography" and "
- Original Message -
From: "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ah yes, Dewitt "I shoot for National Geographic" Jones.
Way more mentions of shooting for NG in his columns than there are
mentions of him in NG's index.
Dewitt Jones was the one who "gave" Rowell his first National Geog
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't think he was a pompous twit. I think he was a darn fine
photographer
with a unique vision and style. Someone not easy to dismiss and someone
who
will be long remembered by many people.
I don't understand why anyone would find
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sh*t - Galen Rowell died? If someone posted this
as a title before today
it never hit my mail box -
He died in a plane crash the summer of 2002. I still remember coming home
from a mountain trip and reading on photo.n
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Galen was a good friend of mine. He really didn't think of himself as
much of a writer, more as a visual artist whose subject was the grandeur
of mountains.
Maybe. But I stll think he was the greatest writer on nature p
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This looks very promising, but the date of this is March. I wonder where
they are up to now? I would be _very_ interested in seeing any sort of
protype or report to be able to make purchasing decisions for the coming
yea
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Besides that if you were to put your camera right there in the same spot
every day and take a photo, everyone of them would be different. Sometimes
it seems that people who are not creative get too tied up into the
general
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Getting past the prose was always my problem.
I have no problems with his prose but then English isn't my first
language...
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
He had a swaggering literary style and was a Nikon bigot.
I pointed that out to him in a letter years ago.
So whats wrong with being a Nikon bigot? I'm a Pentax bigot. I think Rowell
states several times that his experie
201 - 300 of 2309 matches
Mail list logo
