Antonio said:
As to the international nature of the list (and I am only mentioning it
because you brought it up) I do not see what bearing this has on
anything - surely in times of conflict dialogue and debate should be
welcomed between those with differing opinions - the way the world
Ern,
Having followed this list for the past year without contributing my
impression was that you discussed OT topics here all the time.
A.
On 21 May 2004, at 14:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antonio said:
As to the international nature of the list (and I am only mentioning
it
because you brought
Antonio:
Having followed this list for the past year without contributing my
impression was that you discussed OT topics here all the time.
in response to my comment:
Experience has shown that most members of this list do not want
inflammatory
OFF-TOPIC subjects debated HERE, even if
I'm getting tired of this idiot.
The man said, ...inflammatory OFF-TOPIC subjects...
WHAT PART OF THE WORD INFLAMMATORY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
Regards,
Bob...
---
No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in
session.
-- Mark Twain
From:
Well Bob, calling someone an idiot is pretty inflammatory in most
peoples book, not to mention rude. As to inflammatory topics, there is
no such thing. Controversial perhaps, hotly debated certainly, but not
inflammatory.
In any event, all I have done is join discussions that were already
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Ern,
Having followed this list for the past year without contributing my
impression was that you discussed OT topics here all the time.
A.
Yeah, you're right. Usually just long enough for everybody to climb
all over the transgressor, and make him or her feel sorry they
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
I wasn't allowed to, during my brief encouter with the Swedish
military. I'd have to register my camera with the higher officers and
have every picture approved for security reasons.
Was it a while ago?
Yes, it was in 1990. Fourteen years
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
I wasn't allowed to, during my brief encouter with the Swedish
military. I'd have to register my camera with the higher officers and
have every picture approved for security reasons.
Was it a while ago?
Yes, it was
aaggghh
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Feroze,
Why don't you take it up with the person who started the thread?
As to the international nature of the list (and I am only mentioning
it because you brought it up) I do not
aaagg
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Shawn,
I am willing to accept that I may be wrong, but I do not feel that is
the case. The 2% figure you mention is for all computers sold in the
world - Apple has a much higher market
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Why can't they just... was Re: Anyone
still using windows ME
Well Bob, calling someone an idiot is pretty inflammatory in most
peoples book, not to mention rude.
Well, Antonio, Lets take this beyond rude
I'm getting tired of this idiot.
The man said, ...inflammatory OFF-TOPIC subjects...
WHAT PART OF THE WORD INFLAMMATORY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
Regards,
Bob...
I'm getting tired as well.
I have a new proposal.
How about we each send him an individual reply...
EACH and EVERY time he posts
Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Why can't they just... was Re: Anyone still using
windows ME
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Why can't
Thats a really mature position Bob. S. But given you have been one of
the prime flame throwers in this thread I am not surprised.
Antonio
On 21 May 2004, at 20:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting tired of this idiot.
The man said, ...inflammatory OFF-TOPIC subjects...
WHAT PART OF THE WORD
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know what? I don't care. I killfiled him some time ago, when
it became apparent that the signal-to-noise ratio of his contributions
was as close to zero as makes no difference.
Yup. 100% lossless data compression.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and
Antonio,
From past experience on this and many other lists it soon degenerates into a
mud slingy match. This forum is for the discussion of photography which most
of the time does not involve much conflicting opinion. It is impossible to
have a quiet debate on any topic that involves conflict. My
Here we go, more controversy I am afraid, this time from a trade group
for executives of 150 of America's largest corporations:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Chief executives from some of the largest U.S.
companies are criticizing the technology industry in a lobbying
campaign, accusing them of
Who wants to write a virus for such a small population? Where's the glory?
Regards,
Bob...
---
No man's life, liberty or property is safe while the legislature is in
session.
-- Mark Twain
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And lack of viruses.
On 20 May
agg
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Here we go, more controversy I am afraid
How many millions of users does a system need before it becomes a
worthy population would you say? There are plenty of OSX users out
there - more than enough to produce a few viruses if they wanted. All
the evidence however seems to point to the fact that it ain't easy. In
fact it is so hard
aagghh
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
a bunch of non-related photo stuff that has gone on wy to long
Brian,
The 3% you refer to is for all computers - POS, servers, cash machines,
etc. etc. etc. I think you will find that in the domestic/home market
it is more like 10-15%, and in certain creative sectors more like
70-80%.
iPods made a nice profit for the company but so did desktops and
Norm, just do what I did and filter out his messages. If we ignore the
troll, he will go away...
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
On 5/20/04 3:13 PM, Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is what happens in free speech loving democracies.
Hi Antonio,
No, PDML is not the place for exercising the right of free speech.
I think this is becoming too much. Each list (like PDML) has its own
culture nurtured over the
Hi Ken,
Thanks for your comments.
Antonio
On 20 May 2004, at 22:33, KT Takeshita wrote:
On 5/20/04 3:13 PM, Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is what happens in free speech loving democracies.
Hi Antonio,
No, PDML is not the place for exercising the right of free speech.
I think this is
With all due respect: you are biased. You are incompletely informed. And I
think I speak for the majority of the Pentax Discuss community when I say
that I'm tired of seeing your digest-filling posts on this topic. You've
ridden this horse far far too long. It's time to get off the horse and
being
posted here, without invoking the dreaded censorship word.
Just curious
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Norm Baugher
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
aaggh
h
Bill,
Calm down man... IMO, these guys are just chattering... it should be taken
off-list, I agree. It's tedious deleteing every Windows ME thread.
Worse than Mafud? That's probably just because he'd always hand us a loaded
gun with the trigger cocked and we'd pull it to watch what happened.
Tom C wrote:
or just at least go to some other OT subject before we all die of
boredom or frustration?
Sooo.. What do you guys think about the Iraq-war? How about Bush?
/Henri
PS. It's a joke, please do not talk about politics ;-)
you want, but it wont EVER change the fact that you ARE FLAT
OUT WRONG. WHEN WILL YOU UNDERSTAND??
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
How many
You can't reform a narcissist.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated to dumping on
Microsoft, praising the virtues of Linux, and generally being
obnoxious in general?
Perhaps these idiots could seek out that mailing list, go where
people
Hello, nice to meet you too. The link you posted is to a know issue
with DLling dodgly .dmg files (like .Zip files). Basically if you set
your browser to auto open them after DL there is a potential security
risk as you could be unzipping a dodgy piece of software - of course
for it to do
On May 19, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Winston wrote:
Gosh, I would not pay the cost of G5 for the speed it offers.
Neither would I... not in this country anyway.
OTOH Virginia Tech got a pretty good bang for their bucks. But that's
not exactly a Photoshop machine :)
Cheers,
- Dave (a G5 owner)
]
Subject: Re: Photoshop Machine (Was RE: Anyone still using windows ME)
On May 19, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Winston wrote:
Gosh, I would not pay the cost of G5 for the speed it offers.
Neither would I... not in this country anyway.
OTOH Virginia Tech got a pretty good bang for their bucks
Hi Antonio,
I was expecting that you would read the following paragraph in that article
in response to your query why Mac is usually spared for virus attack which
is very rampant in Windows machine. Never mind on OS/X security hole etc.
Typically, people write exploits and other forms of
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 12:41:47 AM, graywolf wrote:
g Golly, that will virus wipe a bunch of hard drives, won't it?
This email contains the HONOR SYSTEM virus. Send ten copies of this message
to your friends and then reformat your hard drive.
Regards,
Bob...
I wouldn't joke at that ;-)
On May 19, 2004, at 9:49 PM, Winston wrote:
In my defense, I use my photoshop machine mostly for playing games
though :(
That's OK; I may use my Photoshop machine for Photoshop, but I also use
my scanning machine for games :)
But hey, at least we have something in common - I use a G5 toofrom
BW I suspect that if you did a poll the overwhelming majority of
BW those people would know perfectly well what the English plural of
BW 'box' is, but continue to say 'boxen' for nerdy jargon reasons.
I have a herd of boxen to care for
from Ox, pl. Oxen
Best regards,
Frantisek Vlcek
Yes. I am English and english is my first language. Born and bred in
good old London, UK. As you can see in the dictionary the main meaning
of sub-standard is below an established or required standard.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 15:45, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Hi Henri,
I beg your pardon. There was no need for that. I was merely pointing
out to Henri that the main meaning of sub-standard was not as he had
understood.
As to this being a friendly group I would beg to differ with that
assertion. There appear to be some very unfriendly people here from
what I
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I beg your pardon. There was no need for that. I was merely pointing out
to Henri that the main meaning of sub-standard was not as he had
understood.
As to this being a friendly group I would beg to differ with that
assertion. There appear to be some very unfriendly
I wish that there was no need for that, but apparently there is. Most of
the unfriendly comments have come from you, and many of the others are
in response to you.
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I beg your pardon. There was no need for that. I was merely pointing
out to Henri that the main meaning
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Yes. I am English and english is my first language. Born and bred in
good old London, UK. As you can see in the dictionary the main
meaning of sub-standard is below an established or required standard.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 15:45, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Antonio
Henri,
I have said all along that Windows is a sub-standard OS. i.e. a poor
quality one. I have not changed my mind on this matter, nor have I said
otherwise. Below an established or required standard IS poor quality in
English. It was you who attempted to shift the meaning to
non-standard, as
I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
here on this list but I believe I have no been unfriendly. You however
seem to have made quite a few unfriendly remarks.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 18:09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I wish that there was no need for that, but
w.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.95.133.170]
X-Declude-Spoolname: Db15e0e8.SMD
I have no problem with your opinions. Some of your comments to
Yeah right. You think you have not said anything unfriendly, what about
when you said:
Would everyone please just ignore him until he calms down or goes away
or perhaps
This is a friendly and tolerant group. Try to fit in.
You seem to enjoy throwing stones from he sidelines.
Antonio
On 19 May
p.s. Hows about instead of asking me to fit in whatever that is, that
you accept and respect other peoples opinions.
Antonio
On 19 May 2004, at 21:27, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Yeah right. You think you have not said anything unfriendly, what
about when you said:
Would everyone please just
Oh and here comes another one to join the bandwagon! As far as I am
aware subscribers to this group can post as many messages to whatever
thread I please. Had it not occurred to you that the reason I have made
so many posts is because I have been constantly bombarded by messages
that I did not
wrote:
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
here on this list but I believe I have no been unfriendly.
No, you have not been
Hi ERN,
I don't think we have spoken before. Welcome to the discussion.I did
not use the term sub-standard loosely, but rather specifically in
relation to the quality of the windows OS, using additional terms such
as shoddy, poor quality etc. etc. to further illustrate my opinion. It
was
Please make this thread go away, please make this thread go away, please
make this thread go awayclicking heels together
Find a happly, find a happy place, find a happy place thumb in mouth
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
I have said all along that Windows is a sub-standard OS.
Below an established or required standard IS poor quality in English.
Okey, Fact #1: Windows is the standard of todays workstation operating
systems.
You say: Windows is sub-standard, ie. below an established
OK friends, time to add one (or more) new rules to Outlook...
Dario
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
here on this list but I believe I have no been unfriendly.
No, you have
Shawn,
I don't think I ever asked for anyone to bend over backwards, nor do I
recognise any relentless windows bashing - I was just voicing an
opinion (admittedly strongly held), joining the debate and defending
myself from attacks from people like you. If you wanted the matter
dropped you
Begin forwarded message:
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 19 May 2004 22:23:59 GMT+02:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
Hi Henri, thanks for your message. I think you are confusing two
separate things.
1) the quality of the windows OS (I believe
I'm done beating this dead horse. A phrase in America that means the
conversation is over.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
Shawn,
I
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
I may have argued an opinion that has not found widespread approval
here on this list but I believe I have no been unfriendly
In a message dated 5/19/2004 1:53:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Friendly person? Either you have a huge patience or you haven't been
following the thread. ;-)
/Henri
---
I am not aware that Antonio has called anyone names. As he has been called.
In
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
In a message dated 5/19/2004 1:53:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Friendly person? Either you have a huge patience or you haven't been
following the thread. ;-)
/Henri
Image quality will suffer greatly as the digital projectors have nowhere near the
resolution of even the lowest digital camera. 1.3 Mpixels at the top end.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Shaun Canning[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19/05/04 02:21:53
If I was you Joe, I'd
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
In a message dated 5/19/2004 1:53:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Friendly person? Either you have a huge patience or you haven't
Bob, it's a joke.
Lighten up.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
Gee...
I'm sorry to be living, Peter...
Have a great day.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh jeze, somebody woke up Bob
Please Lord, let this thread die!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
On Wed, 19 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But sometimes, yes, this list has
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using WIndows ME?
Trolling again, Shawn?
Shawn K. wrote:
What is a herd instinct? Where do you draw the line at being a herd
instinct and not being a herd instinct?? For instance, what would you
call
What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholders or
something? All I said was that Windows was a substandard operating
system and that it was riddled with viruses and spyware and that we the
users deserved better, especially given the money the company makes.
Antonio
On 18
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholders or
something? All I said was that Windows was a substandard operating
system and that it was riddled with viruses
Well why did you contribute to it then? I ignore threads I am not
interested in - it is quite easy.
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 17:02, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
What happened, did I run into a room full
standard in computing? I think they should be doing
betterl, a lot better.
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 17:17, Bill Owens wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholders
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
I don't need to. I also use Mac OSX, which is virus free and works like
a dream come true. But that doesnt mean that I should not be
dissatisfied with shoddy workmanship. I guess
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
I don't need to. I also use Mac OSX, which is virus free and works like
a dream come true. But that doesnt mean that I should not be
dissatisfied with shoddy workmanship. I guess if Windows were
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Well OSX runs just fine on my G4 1 gig. Do you own a Mac? Nobody said
OSX was 64 bit either. As far as I am aware the new G5 chips are 64 bit
but OSX isn't yet. As to price I think you are wrong, a similarly
specced Wintel machine
18, 2004 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Well OSX runs just fine on my G4 1 gig. Do you own a Mac? Nobody said
OSX was 64 bit either. As far as I am aware the new G5 chips are 64 bit
but OSX isn't yet. As to price I think you are wrong, a similarly
William Robb writes:
Maybe it's because those of us who have been on this list
for several years are tired of this particular discussion
coming up a couple of times a year.
Yup!
And God help us if the other Bob wakes up! He doesn't tolerate fools meekly.
I hope his son is doing well.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
What happened, did I run into a room full of Microsoft shareholders or
something? All I said was that Windows
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Ok, I am open to being wrong. Could yo point me to some examples?
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 18:58, John Francis wrote:
As far as I am aware there is no spy-ware nor viruses on OSX
releases are even more insecure. And that my friends is pretty
bad. I prefer windows, it works, and it works everytime.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Ok, I am open to being wrong. Could yo point me to some examples?
Antonio
On 18 May 2004, at 18:58, John Francis wrote:
As far as I am aware there is no spy-ware nor viruses on OSX. I
believe
that is by design.
GAHHH Sorry, Antonio, but you
In a message dated 5/17/2004 12:32:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Check out AVG. http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_dwnl_free.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marnie aka Doe :-) I used McAffe at first when it was new on this machine
(under ME), then it expired. So I removed it.
Hi,
This has actually nothing to do with regular languages. It's just
computer lingo. The jargon of nerds, if you will.
I doubt that.
As another example, one unix, several unices. And several boxes running
a unix version is often referred to as boxen.
It's nerd jargon if they know the
You can set up windows to do the same thing Antonio.
-Shawn
Give it up, Shawn. You can't convince him with facts
that don't match his pre-determined prejudices.
PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Anyone still using Windows ME?
KEEP DREAMING!!! The whole point of 35mm was convenience, convenience, and
more convenience. Digital out does the convenience factor by about a
hundred miles. And the beauty of digital is the ease of integrating
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
This has actually nothing to do with regular languages. It's just
computer lingo. The jargon of nerds, if you will.
I doubt that.
As another example, one unix, several unices. And several boxes running
a unix version is often referred to as boxen.
It's nerd jargon
Hi,
But hey, I agree with you that people are stupid and say stuff wrong
because they are ignorant.
I did not say people are stupid.
--
Cheers,
Bob
' ( was Re: Anyone still using
windows ME
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
This has actually nothing to do with regular languages. It's just
computer lingo. The jargon of nerds, if you will.
I doubt that.
As another example, one unix, several unices. And several boxes running
a unix version is often
people are stupid ... you did now.. :)
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Eliminating 'virii' ( was Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:59:55 +0100
Hi,
But hey, I agree with you that people are stupid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Well OSX runs just fine on my G4 1 gig. Do you own a Mac? Nobody said
OSX was 64 bit either. As far as I am aware the new G5 chips are 64 bit
but OSX isn't yet
it only means you don't know how to.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Shawn, you cannot install any software on OSX unless you enter the
Admin
: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Shawn, you cannot install any software on OSX unless you enter the
Admin password - therefore by design a virus cannot install and run
itself which is the big problem with Windows.
Antonio
On 18 May 2004
On 5/18/04 5:53 PM, Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really, I didn't know that. Interesting. So how come Windows is still
so vulnerable to virus attacks?
Hi Antonio,
Nice to meet you (on the list :-).
This might help you understand what's going on in each OS?
Because flaws in software go beyond the blatantly obvious...
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone still using windows ME
Really, I didn't know that. Interesting. So how
Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win ME is super-slow, super-buggy, super-unstable; super-crappy.
MR That's pretty much what I've heard.
The way I heard it, it's quite a hybrid. With many things inherited
still from good old Dos and subsequent hybrids like W95/W98, while
some things
Hi Mark.
I have ME on my onsite computers.They came that way from the photog that sold me his
stuff.So far
only one problem since 2001, July.I run PS 6, AcDc,Corel 7,but no internet.
The problem seemed to fix itself after a day of being shut off,so i'm not sure what
happened there.
Not sure if
What windows software isnt? Its amazing that a company with so so so
much money at its disposal continues to put out such shoddy substandard
products.
Antonio
On 17 May 2004, at 13:50, Mark Roberts wrote:
Win ME is super-slow, super-buggy, super-unstable; super-crappy
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
What windows software isnt? Its amazing that a company with so so so
much money at its disposal continues to put out such shoddy
substandard products.
Well, it's much worse than say, Win Xp.
Substandard? Maybe that's the wrong word for it. Windows IS the standard
for
Not when you realize their main interest is selling support contracts to
corporations.
--
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
What windows software isnt? Its amazing that a company with so so so
much money at its disposal continues to put out such shoddy substandard
products.
Antonio
On 17 May 2004, at
Don't kid yourself, OS-X is based on a Unix version that's that's a
hackers wet dream and a developers nightmare.
Cotty wrote:
On 17/5/04, HENRI, discombobulated, offered:
Substandard? Maybe that's the wrong word for it. Windows IS the standard
for operating systems. However crappy it may
Hi Peter, I dont want to get into a flame situation here, but I do not
think that I have ever heard of OSX being either hacked nor a problem
for developers. Can you support you statement with an example?
Certainly I do not think any OS is totally imune from a determined
hack, but all the
Much worse than Xp - thats an interesting way of putting it! Bug
ridden POS. Xp is not much better - in fact as far as virus,
spyware
and the like are concerned it is 1,000 times worse! They should
have
named it VXp for Virus Experience!
Gosh, I've been running XP for almost a
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
