-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It all started with the Great Vowel Shift...
-frank
==
Okay, I'll bite. What the heck is the Great Vowel Shift?
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual.
Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say french, where
much
rude slang is blasphmemous.
Sacre bleu!!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 4, 2006, at 2:06 PM, John Francis wrote:
Quite. I'm often amused when a TV character with a British accent
(such as Spike, in Buffy the Vampire Slayer) says Bugger off,
or the like - it appears to be a loophole in the great American
puritanical broadcast TV vocabulary rules.
Yes,
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu AM 10:10:31 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:30 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Name of an Andelusian dog! That requires satisfaction! Name your
weapons! (If we're using digital, can you hang on for a minute
while my batteries finish charging?)
I choose Polish sausages at 25 paces.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Name of an Andelusian dog! That requires satisfaction! Name your weapons!
(If we're using digital, can you hang on for a minute while my batteries
finish charging?)
Deus ex machina mode
Here, have some AA Lithiums!
/Deus ex machina mode
Kostas
Ha!
I'd not seen that one.
Dave (Also easily ammused ;-)
On 10/5/06, Mitch Conant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David:
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite
heavily:
Now, that's funny!!! Hey I'll admit I'm not part of the PC (politically
correct) crowd g.
Like I said no offence intended ;-)
Dave
On 10/5/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From www.onelook.com:
Quick definitions (pom)
noun: a disparaging term for English immigrants to Australia or New Zealand
Sooo... er...
Thanks, I guess...
hm.
Jostein :-)
On 10/4/06, David
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu AM 10:44:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:30 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Name of an Andelusian dog! That requires satisfaction
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:57:24 +1300, you wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 12:29 AM, David Savage wrote:
It's pretty mild language here. I tend to utter it when something
stuffs up.
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it
quite heavily:
On 10/4/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pun thread... I'm gonna gag.
I've thought long and hard about it, and I don't think these are puns.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/4/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pun thread... I'm gonna gag.
I've thought long and hard about it, and I don't think these are
puns.
Yup. That's the modern way. It's all going down.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/5/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup. That's the modern way. It's all going down.
It all started with the Great Vowel Shift...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 10/5/2006 1:28:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It all started with the Great Vowel Shift...
-frank
==
Okay, I'll bite. What the heck is the Great Vowel Shift?
Marnie aka who has a lot of vowels
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 6, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I just had a look at it and it's effing brilliant! (If American
television commercials were like that I'd probably consider getting a
television.)
Bear in mind that the ad in question hasn't been aired here for years.
- Dave (hates annoying ads
)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: 3. oktober 2006 21:19
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On 9/30/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: 3. oktober 2006 21:19
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On 9/30/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave,
That's the bugger.
Bad choice
It's pretty mild language here. I tend to utter it when something stuffs up.
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite heavily:
http://www.videofoundry.co.nz/ianman/humour/bugger.html
From what I've read it received 100+ official complaints in NZ and 1 here in
Oz.
Mail List
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
be this parlance that is more British English than American English,
though. To call something
limited.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 12:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 4. oktober 2006 12:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
To bugger
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual. Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say french, where much
rude slang is blasphmemous.
We are equal
On 10/4/06, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The use of the word itself is not so bad. Its use in relation to
molested children portraits is what may have been unintentionally
offensive to some people.
I think that summarizes my feelings exactly, Dan. BTW, I brought it
up to
On 10/4/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual. Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say french
On 10/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can't get the coffee out of my keyboard, yer buying me a new one.
It's a bad sign when a man can't handle his coffee. Maybe it's time to
switch to booze.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can't get the coffee out of my keyboard, [Robb's] buying me a new one.
Yeah.
Like that'll happen...
cheers,
frank
g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/4/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/4/06, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The use of the word itself is not so bad. Its use in relation to
molested children portraits is what may have been unintentionally
offensive to some people.
I think that summarizes
Well isn't that what buggery is stuffing something up?
David Savage wrote:
It's pretty mild language here. I tend to utter it when something stuffs up.
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite
heavily:
http://www.videofoundry.co.nz/ianman/humour/bugger.html
In a message dated 10/4/2006 8:50:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well isn't that what buggery is stuffing something up?
==
Now it's getting a bit offensive.
Marnie :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Dan,
When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
reaction to Becky Carter's imagery from last time around. The word
molested slid very easily into my brain then. I suppose a hyphen
between photoshop and the said word would have been more
appropriate.
My apologies if I
From www.onelook.com:
Quick definitions (pom)
noun: a disparaging term for English immigrants to Australia or New Zealand
Sooo... er...
Thanks, I guess...
hm.
Jostein :-)
On 10/4/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/4/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/4/06,
Only a bit? I'm not trying hard enough.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/4/2006 8:50:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well isn't that what buggery is stuffing something up?
==
Now it's getting a bit offensive.
Marnie :-)
--
Things should be
In a message dated 10/4/2006 9:51:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know, getting the finer points right with slang terms is the
toughest challenge with English. It's even worse than seeing the logic
in the pronounciation...:-)
Jostein
===
That's because there isn't
Actually there's historic logic in the pronunciation. Remember English
pronunciation was being codified when the entire ruling class was
clobbered by French speakers. No one much cared about the proper
pronunciation of English for a couple hundred years after that, since
the Court Language
David:
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite
heavily:
Now, that's funny!!! Hey I'll admit I'm not part of the PC (politically
correct) crowd g. It is almost as funny as this one (I think it was
Aussie):
http://www.mme-ia.com/humor/video/lv03.mpg
Easily
Hell, the Commonwealth sshouldn't be offended either. No less a man
than Winston Churchill described the Real traditions of the English
Navy as rum, buggery, and the lash.
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Thanks Dan,
When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
reaction to Becky
Well, you only offended the commonwealth, most Americans have no idea
what Buggery is.
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Thanks Dan,
When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
reaction to Becky Carter's imagery from last time around. The word
molested slid very easily into my brain
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
be this parlance that is more British English than American English,
Quite. I'm often amused when
John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
be this parlance that is more British English than American English,
Quite.
, of course, anal sex is not
restricted to gay people.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 04 October 2006 11:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits
The Commonwealth is not offended. It's still compulsory in most
schools.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: 04 October 2006 19:21
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or
sexual. Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say
french, where much
rude slang
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
described as sodomy (especially
You know, getting the finer points right with slang terms is the
toughest challenge with English. It's even worse than seeing the
logic
in the pronounciation...:-)
Jostein
===
That's because there isn't any. Logic, that is.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Oh, there is! It's very simple and
On 10/4/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, there is! It's very simple and easy to understand, provided you
can read and speak Anglo-Saxon, Old Norse, Latin and Norman French,
and fully understand the history and background of the Great Vowel
Shift.
Ah yes. The Great Vowel Shift (or as I
pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 19:56:13 +0100
You know, getting the finer points right with slang terms is the
toughest challenge with English. It's even worse than seeing the
logic
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
described as sodomy (especially
help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Well, you only offended the commonwealth, most Americans have no
idea
what Buggery is.
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Thanks Dan,
When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
reaction to Becky Carter's imagery from last
children portraits?
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or
sexual. Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say
french, where much
rude
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Thanks Dan,
When posting the original question I remembered very vividly my
reaction to Becky Carter's imagery from last time around. The word
molested slid very easily into my brain then. I suppose a hyphen
between photoshop and the said word would have been more
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
described as sodomy (especially
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in
American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
described as sodomy
Cotty wrote:
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
described as sodomy
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in
American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for example, is often
described as sodomy
Cotty wrote:
Oral sex, for example, is often
described as sodomy (especially in American news reporting).
I bet that leaves a nasty taste in the mouth.
Oh come now.
I meant it tongue-in-cheek
Cunning!
Another pun thread... I'm gonna gag.
--
Christian
On 05/10/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in
American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex,
At 02:06 AM 5/10/2006, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
be this parlance that is more British English than
David Savage wrote:
At 02:06 AM 5/10/2006, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't know what the issue is other than prudishness.
To bugger someone means to have anal intercourse with them. Seems to
be this parlance that is more British
At 06:22 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous with buggery; in
American
usage it means just about any variation on sexual activity apart
from the most rudimentary forms. Oral sex, for
While sodomize has retained much of its original meaning, sod has
been watered down over time. It originally meant a sodomizer and was
also used as a derogatory term for homosexual. In modern parlance, it
has come to mean chap or guy in some contexts and kid or brat in others.
Paul
On Oct 4,
Same thing is true of Punk.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
While sodomize has retained much of its original meaning, sod has
been watered down over time. It originally meant a sodomizer and was
also used as a derogatory term for homosexual. In modern parlance, it
has come to mean chap or guy in
Monica, where are you when we need you ?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Note, too, the difference in meaning of sodomize. In British
English sodomy is pretty much synonomous
On Oct 5, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
From www.onelook.com:
Quick definitions (pom)
noun: a disparaging term for English immigrants to Australia or
New Zealand
I wouldnt say it's disparaging, unless we're using the term whinging
pom (very rare these days). If what I see in
On Oct 5, 2006, at 12:29 AM, David Savage wrote:
It's pretty mild language here. I tend to utter it when something
stuffs up.
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it
quite heavily:
http://www.videofoundry.co.nz/ianman/humour/bugger.html
From what I've read
On 9/30/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave,
That's the bugger.
Bad choice of words, Jostein (recognizing, of course, that as English
isn't your first language, you may not know what bugger is slang
for).
I should write you off list.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Please do Frank...
Jostein
On 10/3/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/30/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave,
That's the bugger.
Bad choice of words, Jostein (recognizing, of course, that as English
isn't your first language, you may not know what
Aw common!
The scarring from the first time around just healed and look what comes
back upg.
Mitch
David Savage wrote:
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
Dave
On 10/1/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back, someone posted a link to the work of a
On 01/10/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True mate, but the thought process that leads to people thinking children
should look like this is not dissimilar to one that leads to those worse
things you allude to.
IMO kids should not be made up to look like sex symbols, full stop.
Sendt: 30. september 2006 20:31
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Thanks Dave,
That's the bugger.
Jostein
On 9/30/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
Dave
On 10/1/06, Jostein
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Matt Kelch
Sendt: 1. oktober 2006 05:08
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Its still scary.
The eyes are the worst... All of them have the exact same stare
Den 1. okt. 2006 kl. 08.25 skrev Digital Image Studio:
On 01/10/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True mate, but the thought process that leads to people thinking
children
should look like this is not dissimilar to one that leads to those
worse
things you allude to.
IMO
]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On 01/10/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True mate, but the thought process that leads to people thinking children
should look like
On Sep 30, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Matt Kelch wrote:
Its still scary.
The eyes are the worst... All of them have the exact same stare.
Yeah, like taxidermist's eyes.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Matt Kelch
Sendt: 1. oktober 2006 05:08
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Its still scary.
The eyes are the worst... All of them have the exact same stare.
Paul Stenquist
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Jostein Øksne
Sendt: 30. september 2006 20:31
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Thanks
Like one of those horror movies in which dolls or Teddy Bears come to
live and kill... kill ... kill.
The person who does that stuff needs professional help.
D
Bob Shell wrote:
On Sep 30, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Matt Kelch wrote:
Its still scary.
The eyes are the worst... All of them have
A while back, someone posted a link to the work of a children's
portrait photographer who thoroughly mashed up the portraits to look
like some kind of glam shots.
Does anyone still remember, and have a link?
Thanks,
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
Dave
On 10/1/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back, someone posted a link to the work of a children's
portrait photographer who thoroughly mashed up the portraits to look
like some kind of glam shots.
Does anyone still
On 01/10/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
That was fast, was that in your bookmarks Dave? ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Send in the Clones...
On Sep 30, 2006, at 1:31 PM, David Savage wrote:
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 10/1/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/10/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
That was fast, was that in your bookmarks Dave? ;-)
Yep, under Photoshop What not to do
Ha!
Dave (BC and hose images are
Thanks Dave,
That's the bugger.
Jostein
On 9/30/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
Dave
On 10/1/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back, someone posted a link to the work of a children's
portrait photographer
Den 30. sep. 2006 kl. 19.26 skrev Jostein Øksne:
A while back, someone posted a link to the work of a children's
portrait photographer who thoroughly mashed up the portraits to look
like some kind of glam shots.
Does anyone still remember, and have a link?
Ha, now I know why you asked:
Awful, almost as bad as missy contests for children i the US.
DagT
Den 30. sep. 2006 kl. 19.31 skrev David Savage:
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
Dave
On 10/1/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back, someone posted a link to the work of a children's
Yup, I thought it was appropriate for the thread...:-)
Jostein
On 9/30/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Den 30. sep. 2006 kl. 19.26 skrev Jostein Øksne:
A while back, someone posted a link to the work of a children's
portrait photographer who thoroughly mashed up the portraits to look
It was. Someone in that thread reacted by remembering JonBenet.
To the others: The thread is actually about some very negative
reactions to a photographer who said that she could remove zits (is
that the right word?) and other skin problems from pictures of
children.
DagT
Den 30. sep.
Absolutely hideous. Why can't kids look like kids?
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Is this the one?
http
]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Is this the one?
http://beckycarter.com/
shudder
Dave
On 10/1/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back, someone posted a link
:
Absolutely hideous. Why can't kids look like kids?
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Is this the one?
http
On 01/10/06, Matt Kelch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its still scary.
The eyes are the worst... All of them have the exact same stare.
The Stepford children
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just find it sick.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kelch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
Its still scary.
The eyes are the worst... All of them have
On 01/10/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just find it sick.
It's different but there are a whole lot of worse things that people
do with children, got to consider it in perspective.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On 01/10/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just find it sick.
It's different but there are a whole lot of worse
93 matches
Mail list logo
