couldn't resist ;)
I want a $400 400mm!!
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Yep, didn't I mention the 400mm lens that came with my new k-01? It
was a two-lens kit with the 15-55.
(this is what I get for multitasking...!)
:P
-c
On Thu, Apr 25,
Me, too. It would be great on my $2000 Pentax full frame dslr.
Har!
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
couldn't resist ;)
I want a $400 400mm!!
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Yep, didn't I mention the 400mm
Wow, you can get a 15-55? Do want! And Pentax reissued a 400mm?
Amazing! Who thought their lineup on long lenses was weak? ;)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
For those that might be interested in snagging a k01...
Yep, didn't I mention the 400mm lens that came with my new k-01? It
was a two-lens kit with the 15-55.
(this is what I get for multitasking...!)
:P
-c
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, you can get a 15-55? Do want! And Pentax reissued a 400mm?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013, Mark C wrote:
On 2/21/2013 9:57 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Gotcha. That does make the K-01 a little more tempting. I like TAv
because I want to control shutter/aperture without thinking. I
spent yesterday afternoon with a professional photographer [*],
and he made a 13x20 print
On 2/25/2013 9:04 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Out of curiosity, how much testing have you done with high ISO? I don't
mean 100% blowups where you can see every blemish, but full-image shots
on a large monitor or large-ish prints (like the 13x20 I have).
I wouldn't have believed how little noise
Cool... Good chance for people to get one why they're offered for
sale... Personally though - I ain't gettin' it...
On 2/20/2013 5:55 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/products/others.html
BH still has the bodies in your choice of colors for $299. Get one
with the DA40 for
On 2/20/2013 10:32 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but is the live view on the K-01 that much
better than the K-5's? I don't see improvement on the K-30 relative to
the K-5, though supposedly the K-30 is better.
Focus peaking makes all the difference. For high magnification
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013, Mark C wrote:
On 2/20/2013 10:32 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but is the live view on the K-01 that much
better than the K-5's? I don't see improvement on the K-30 relative to
the K-5, though supposedly the K-30 is better.
Focus peaking makes all
Pentaximaging .com doesn't have it officially discontinued so I bet
there's a ton of them unsold in the US.
On 2/20/2013 10:55 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/products/others.html
BH still has the bodies in your choice of colors for $299. Get one
with the DA40 for an extra
On the other hand they no longer show the black version and the white is
not featured, so I guess they just have a ton of the Yellow Designer
model.
On 2/21/2013 11:50 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Pentaximaging .com doesn't have it officially discontinued so I bet
there's a ton of them unsold in
On 2/21/2013 9:57 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Ah-ha -- turns out the K-30 has a delay in displaying focus peaking
(about half a second after focusing), so that's why I didn't see it
earlier (because I was rushing it a bit).
Well, that is good to know. I haven't paid any attention to the K-30 but
Mine is on the truck right now, out for delivery...!
I decided that, if for $350, I could get the k-5 sensor, a 40mm lens,
an always in my purse camera, one I wouldn't mind the kids
borrowing, and maybe try focus peaking for some macro/jewelery work I
shoot, then... why not?
Besides, the
I have no regrets at all regarding purchase of the K-01. When it first
was announced I contemplated getting one and replacing my K-7 with it.
The K-7 is just a backup for my K-5, and sees virtually no use. I am
beginning to think that the k-01 could fill the backup role *and*
provide value by
Interesting point. I wonder how much I could get for my K-x?
Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
I have no regrets at all regarding purchase of the K-01. When it first
was announced I contemplated getting one and replacing my K-7 with it.
The K-7 is just a backup for my K-5, and sees virtually
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Mine is on the truck right now, out for delivery...!
I decided that, if for $350, I could get the k-5 sensor, a 40mm lens,
an always in my purse camera, one I wouldn't mind the kids
borrowing, and maybe try focus
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013, Mark C wrote:
I have no regrets at all regarding purchase of the K-01. When it
first was announced I contemplated getting one and replacing my K-7
with it. The K-7 is just a backup for my K-5, and sees virtually no
use. I am beginning to think that the k-01 could fill
On aps-c i love the 50 for portraits. I like to work somewhat close though. My
favorite normal lens on aps-c is 28mm...works out to 42mm or so. I hate 50mm on
full frame, but 40ish is nice indeed. 35 is often too wide imo, though great
for landscapes.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On
Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K-01 Has Arrived!
Message-ID:510b1bb2.3060...@charter.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I don't know where you live, but if you see Santa tell him I say Hi!
We're getting a little lake effect snow but more blowing and drifting
than
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:43:31PM -0800, Larry Colen wrote:
The prime I almost never use on APS is my 50. Too long for a standard, too
wide for a portrait.
And yet the Limited 77mm was a pretty popular lens back in the film days (with
basically the same AOV).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I don't know where you live, but if you see Santa tell him I say Hi!
We're getting a little lake effect snow but more blowing and drifting
than anything else. I could not resist going out with the K-01 and
seeing how it fares. With focus peaking and the zoom in the ability to
zoom in on the
On Jan 31, 2013, at 19:34 , Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
The 40mm XS is remarkably tiny. I love 40mm on a full frame camera but it's
not my favorite on the APC C bodies. But for an extra $90 what's not to like
about the lens?
I have my dad's old 40mm M lens. It's still...small.
On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 31, 2013, at 19:34 , Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
The 40mm XS is remarkably tiny. I love 40mm on a full frame camera but it's
not my favorite on the APC C bodies. But for an extra $90 what's not to like
about the lens?
On Jan 30, 2013, at 21:45 , Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
For my specific intended purpose I thing that the K-01 will be great. It was
60F when I left for work this morning, 35F when I drove home, and high
tomorrow is predicted to be 18F. (That would be 15, 2, and -8 C) Lots of snow
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
My interest is rising.
Does anyone have a K-01 and a K-5 and can compare the shutter sound? Is the
K-01 quiet?
Hi Derby,
They're almost the same despite the fact that the only sound produced
by the K-01 is the aperture
Thanks Bong
That's a good point about the weather sealing.
The shutter actuates when it comes on? So when the camera is off or
asleep, the shutter is closed? Interesting, because the M4/3 cameras
leave the shutter open when it is off.
D
On 15/11/2012 7:23 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
On Thu,
Derby, I have not heard it but I have read it is quieter than the K-5
without the slapping of the mirror. I'll let you know next week if
Amazon comes through on their shipping. Yes I am weak and have given in
at the $350 price point.
It is gaining some adherents as a street camera as quiet
Thank you for all your kind words...am now in a quandary about having
to buy our own K-01... :-\
Bong :-)
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Beautiful story, looking forward to keeping up with her work!
:)
-c
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM,
Beautiful story, looking forward to keeping up with her work!
:)
-c
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
I owe Christine this report... :-)
http://bong.manayon.net/2012/05/pentax-k-01.html
The reason for the delay is this:
That is a very touching blog Bong, and your daughter certainly has an eye for a
composition!
Thank you for sharing it.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bong
Manayon
Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2012
Harumph!
After about half a dozen rejects st the Pentax Gallery I stopped submitting.
Your daughter submits two and is accepted.
That says something.
As in: She's an excellent photographer!
Wonderful, informative and inspiring story about your daughter and the K 01.
Thanks for sharing it.
On 5/16/2012 18:34, Bong Manayon wrote:
I owe Christine this report... :-)
http://bong.manayon.net/2012/05/pentax-k-01.html
The reason for the delay is this:
http://bong.manayon.net/2012/05/erika-pentax-k-01.html
Something in the latter post had to take place before I emailed this,
you'll
Thank you for sharing both links, Bong.
I find your daughter's skill with the K-01 to be extremely interesting.
The final two photos are really outstanding images. I think that is
terrific that you have given her a new tool that she can experience
the world AND express herself through. I think it
Bong,
Good report, touching story, excellent pictures.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
I owe Christine this report... :-)
http://bong.manayon.net/2012/05/pentax-k-01.html
The reason for the delay is this:
What Darren said...better than I could have, perhaps. Thank you for
sharing the story and her images. I'm looking forward to seeing more
from her.
-p
On 5/16/2012 10:48 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Thank you for sharing both links, Bong.
I find your daughter's skill with the K-01 to be
A beautiful thing, Bong. Thank you for sharing this.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
I owe Christine this report... :-)
http://bong.manayon.net/2012/05/pentax-k-01.html
The reason for the delay is this:
On May 16, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Thank you for sharing both links, Bong.
I find your daughter's skill with the K-01 to be extremely interesting.
The final two photos are really outstanding images. I think that is
terrific that you have given her a new tool that she can
Nice report, Bong! Your daughter's gallery is really nice. She should
definitely be encouraged!
Cheers, Christine
On May 16, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
I owe Christine this report... :-)
http://bong.manayon.net/2012/05/pentax-k-01.html
The reason for
Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to play around with the K-01? Any photos to
share?
Miserere, are you planing to do the review of the camera? Is Pentax
going to send you a loaner to test?
Bill, has your pusher given you one to test?
Just
Certainly not desperate; just curious. We'll all have to wait for Jens'
gallery, right Jens? :-) Cheers, Christine
On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Miserere wrote:
Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to play around with the K-01? Any photos to
share?
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to play around with the K-01? Any photos to share?
Miserere, are you planing to do the review of the camera? Is Pentax going to
send you a loaner to test?
Bill, has your pusher given you
Will do, Bong! Cheers, Christine
On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:33 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com
wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to play around with the K-01? Any photos to share?
Miserere, are you planing to do the review of the
on 2012-04-01 20:45 William Robb wrote
Considering that I think the K-01 is the most useless piece of crap short of a
Santorum coated turd, I doubt very much if he'll be offering me one to test.
i Romneyed when i read that!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well, good to know your unabashed view, William! :-) Cheers, Christine
On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:45 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 31/03/2012 10:13 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to play around with the K-01? Any photos to share?
Bill, has your pusher given you one to test?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com
Subject: Re: K-01?
on 2012-04-01 20:45 William Robb wrote
Considering that I think the K-01 is the most useless piece of crap short
of a
Santorum coated turd
No problem Christine, i shall make a Flickr gallery shortly.
It's a very nice camera, still a bit bulky for a compact :-)
The rather large sensor makes up for that, I think.
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Apr 1, 2012 05:29 Christine Aguila
On 31/03/2012 20:12, Jens wrote:
I like this camera - that is except for the right hand side rubber door, which
my thumb tends to open accidently. Some day I'll drop the camera because of
this stupid door:::
I bought this camer for snapshots.
This is one:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:15 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 31/03/2012 20:12, Jens wrote:
I like this camera - that is except for the right hand side rubber door,
which my thumb tends to open accidently. Some day I'll drop the camera
because of this stupid door:::
I
Well, four photo-frinds from the local camera club was on a weekend trip,
visiting the southern part of Jutland and Northern Germany. We did a lot of
landcape photography. But during coffee brakes, I did casual portraits
(snapshots) while chatting and drinking coffee. This image ocured during
On 31/03/2012 10:13 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to play around with the K-01? Any photos to share?
Bill, has your pusher given you one to test?
Considering that I think the K-01 is the most useless piece of crap
short of a Santorum coated turd, I doubt very much if
This is a very handsome portrait. I like it very much, Jens.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
I like this camera - that is except for the right hand side rubber door,
which my thumb tends to open accidently. Some day I'll drop the camera
because of this stupid
Christine
Yes, I've had one for 10 days now. Lovely camera. Good image quality. Not quite
par with the K-5, but still brilliant. I like the focusing functions. But I
hate the rubbber door (right hand side), which my thumb tends to open
aaccidently from time to time - causing me to drop it some
Thanks, Bruce - a lucky shot I geuss :-)
Regards
jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Mar 31, 2012 21:28 Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a very handsome portrait. I like it very much, Jens.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk
Lovely, relaxed, human portrait.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Jens p...@planfoto.dk
Sent: March 31, 2012 3/31/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: K-01 snapshot
I
On 31 March 2012 12:57, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
This was posted last night, so I assume you've found out that the K-01
sensor only produces 12 bit per channel files.
Yep, see my previous post in reply to my original post :-)
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --
Impressive, Jens! Big thanks for posting. Something about the camera I find
intriguing. I wish Pentax sold in camera stores here so I could play with it
at the counter. Jens, post a gallery of shots after you play with it for a
bit. I'd be very interested in seeing the photos. Cheers,
Something like this:
http://www.nodalninja.com/
When stitching a panorama, you want to rotate the camera/lens around
what is called the nodal point of the system to reduce certain types of
distortion.
On 3/10/2012 11:51 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
One must ask. What is a “a panorama head/nodal
No problem, Tim.
I use a Kaidan Panorama Head (and annother one of different barbd for spheric
panoramas).
The panorama head makes sure, that the camera is mounted for vertical shots (in
order to avoid panoramas with relativ low hight) in such a way, that the camera
rotates - not arround the
I envy your ability to explian this in very few words, Larry.
Jens
Something like this:
http://www.nodalninja.com/
When stitching a panorama, you want to rotate the camera/lens around
what is called the nodal point of the system to reduce certain types of
distortion.
On 3/10/2012 11:51 PM,
On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:08 AM, Jens wrote:
I envy your ability to explian this in very few words, Larry.
And I envy your ability to explain things in more than one language.
Jens
Something like this:
http://www.nodalninja.com/
When stitching a panorama, you want to rotate the
An AF30-70 zoom could be a compact addition. Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
Hello list
I've been looking for a compact camera, that will deliver high quality images
low-light shots - especially for snapshots with no using a flash.
I used to
Thanks - perhaps I got one like that :-)
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Mar 11, 2012 14:37 Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
An AF30-70 zoom could be a compact addition. Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
On Mar 10, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jens wrote:
.
I certainly look forward to your report on noughty one.
Which standard zoom would you guys recommend for the K-01, please?
I don't know how it'll work with long lenses. I'd start with 40mm, and just
use whatever zooms you already have until
One must ask. What is a “a panorama head/nodal point adapter”? -T
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
Hello list
I've been looking for a compact camera, that will deliver high quality images
low-light shots - especially for snapshots with no using a flash.
I used
I think but I don't know for sure that the indentation that the actual
lens sits in is threaded so it will take some really tiny filters.
On 2/14/2012 4:28 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
I'd assumed that's why it has Ø27mm written on the lens. That's
usually the way filter thread sizes are shown.
On 15 February 2012 13:08, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I think but I don't know for sure that the indentation that the actual lens
sits in is threaded so it will
On 15/02/2012 7:08 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I think but I don't know for sure that the indentation that the actual
lens sits in is threaded so it will take some really tiny filters.
The new 40mm take 27.5mm filters.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I believe that there's a series V or VI to 27mm adapter, so you could
get one of those cool silver 1940's or 50's silver lens hoods to add
to the overall dorkiness, and lets face it, the longer I look at the
K-01 the dorkier it looks. As I said before. This camera will look
very dated in a very
Reminds me of Kodak box Brownie with a grip. ;-)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:30 AM
Subject: K-01 Photoshoppery
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
Better than the actual ones. Now I wonder how black/yellow stripes (you
know, the bee variation...) will look ;-)
Dario
I wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
Better than the actual ones. Now I wonder how black/yellow stripes (you
know, the bee variation...) will look
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
Better than the actual ones.
I posted that shot over on DP Review and that was the general reaction
I wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
Better than the actual ones. Now I wonder how black/yellow stripes (you
know, the bee variation...) will look
Mark Roberts wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
Better than the actual ones.
I posted that shot over on DP Review and that
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
It looks to me like the worst sort of 70s cheapo crap, but maybe that
On 14/2/12, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
That looks a hell of a lot better than I thought it would.
But I don't like the lens mount
Quoting Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com:
Just for fun. I wondered what the K-01 would look like in New
Zealand garb (that is to say, all black).
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/k-01black.jpg
Maybe it's because of the all-black finish, but I only just noticed
that the DA 40mm F2.8
On 15 February 2012 08:28, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
Maybe it's because of the all-black finish, but I only just noticed that the
DA 40mm F2.8 XS doesn't seem to have a thread or bayonet to attach a hood.
On checking the specs, I notice that no hood is supplied with the
The most important function of auto-correct is turning an annoying
misspelling into fun for all.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Maybe it was a Freudian slip?
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 10/02/12 5:34 PM, P. J. Alling
I'm just not particularly excreted by or interested in it;
Has no one ever heard the expression: You're sh*tt*ng me!?!
P.J. has just turned it into a more polite proper negative declaration.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Walt Gilbert
On 2/9/2012 10:22 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Headline: Pentax K-01 mirrorless camera doesn't feel as cheap as it
looks by the powerful engadget:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-doesnt-feel-as-cheap-as-it-looks/
(includes a hands-on video).
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:03 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I wonder how hard it would be to make a little electronic viewfinder module
to mount on the hot-shoe?
I haven't spent a lot of time looking, but if the HDMI slot on the
K-01 works the same way it does on the K-5
on 2012-02-09 21:27 Darren Addy wrote
PPS... that includes the 40mm pancake and is $100 less than Amazon's
current price for the K-5 body alone.
caution — the K-5 price you refer to is not Amazon's per se, but no-name,
small-volume vendors on Amazon's storefront who are not authorized Pentax
According to Thom Hogan, the yellow K-01 is being nicknamed the
Tonka. I at least find that hysterical.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:42 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
on 2012-02-09 21:27 Darren Addy wrote
PPS... that includes the 40mm pancake and is $100 less than Amazon's
current
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Thom Hogan, the yellow K-01 is being nicknamed the
Tonka. I at least find that hysterical.
Reminds me more of Lego colors.
Speaking of Tonka, though (OT) I found a nice Tonka pickup at the
local thrift
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: K-01: This is called damning with faint praise...
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
wrote:
According to Thom
At one time there was an after market replacement bed gate for Toyota
pickups that spelled out Tonka where Toyota should have been. I found
that to be quite amusing.
On 2/10/2012 8:33 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Steven Desjardinsdrd1...@gmail.com wrote:
PS... It is now available for preorder at Amazon for $899
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
PPS... that includes the 40mm pancake and is $100 less than Amazon's
current price for the K-5 body alone.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On 2/9/2012 10:22 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Headline: Pentax K-01 mirrorless camera doesn't feel as cheap as it
looks by the powerful engadget:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-doesnt-feel-as-cheap-as-it-looks/
(includes a hands-on video).
Another (lame) one here:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:44:18PM -0600, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 2/9/2012 10:22 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Headline: Pentax K-01 mirrorless camera doesn't feel as cheap as it
looks by the powerful engadget:
On 2/10/2012 12:01 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:44:18PM -0600, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 2/9/2012 10:22 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Headline: Pentax K-01 mirrorless camera doesn't feel as cheap as it
looks by the powerful engadget:
I wouldn't say I hate it. I'm just not particularly excreted by or
interested in it;
On 2/10/2012 12:44 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 2/9/2012 10:22 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Headline: Pentax K-01 mirrorless camera doesn't feel as cheap as it
looks by the powerful engadget:
You've got to spell excited extremely badly for the auto correct to turn
it into excreted.
On 2/10/2012 1:27 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I wouldn't say I hate it. I'm just not particularly excreted by or
interested in it;
On 2/10/2012 12:44 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 2/9/2012 10:22 PM, Darren
Maybe it was a Freudian slip?
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 10/02/12 5:34 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
You've got to spell excited extremely badly for the auto correct to turn
it into excreted.
On 2/10/2012 1:27 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I wouldn't say I hate it. I'm just not
MARK!
2012/2/6 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
The ultimate disrespect for the K-01: it lost the battle for the
hearts of the PDML to toast.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
The breadth and depth of the arcane pedantry on this list is truly
On 3/2/12, steve harley, discombobulated, unleashed:
i despise most toasters; there are only a few worth having, the rest
designed
to fail after a few years; ...
Hmm. I have a simple KitchenAid toaster with wide slots to allow
bagels to be toasted that I bought in 1985 for $20. Still
On 05/02/2012 09:03, Bob W wrote:
On 3/2/12, steve harley, discombobulated, unleashed:
i despise most toasters; there are only a few worth having, the rest
designed
to fail after a few years; ...
Hmm. I have a simple KitchenAid toaster with wide slots to allow
bagels to be toasted that I
i despise most toasters; there are only a few worth having, the
rest
designed
to fail after a few years; ...
Hmm. I have a simple KitchenAid toaster with wide slots to allow
bagels to be toasted that I bought in 1985 for $20. Still working
just
fine. It's a cheap piece of tin crap
I once wrote an essay on Toast, and it may be the most popular thing I
ever published on my blog. Read the comments:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2009/02/10/On-Toast
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
i despise most toasters; there are only a few worth
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
