You're just lucky the majority don't get to make the rules...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Tom Reese Subject: RE: OT: Take a
course in philosophy, will ya.
Bob W wrote:
...Is the USA not a democracy?
Not by the strict definition of democracy. It is a system of
Graywolf wrote:
A politician can win the popular vote, and not be elected president. In
fact it is possible that someone who was not on the ballet could become
president, though that never has happened to my knowledge. What you
really vote for is something like which party gets to
P. J. Alling wrote:
It seems that the T34, (Russian), has a better reputation than it
deserves, it was simple and robust, packed a big punch and had armor
that would stand up to the main gun on a Panzer Mark IV. The Sherman
M1A[X] had also had armor designed to stand up to the Panzer Mark IV.
Part of the reason that Russia lost so many troops was that they, (not
really they, Stalin) was willing to spend lives for propaganda victorys
that the western allies' people wouldn't have stood for. The fact was
that the West was not prepared to start a second front until 1943. The
invasion
Quoting Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I dropped out a long time ago.
Healthy debate can be fun. For some.
But it's often taken personally by others.
And the attacks become personal assults,
coupled with presumption built on presumption.
It does get tiring after a while.
LOL!
No doubt. The sloped armor of the T34 made with an American Steel
formulation btw, could stop the relatively low velocity 75mm AP shells
from the Panzer Mark IV cold. It was quite a surprise to the German
tank crews. Germany answered with a higher velocity 75mm, (maybe it was
a 76mm gun, I
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu AM 06:54:38 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Part of the reason that Russia lost so many troops was that they, (not
really they, Stalin) was willing to spend lives for
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu AM 07:36:14 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
No doubt. The sloped armor of the T34 made with an American Steel
formulation btw, could stop the relatively low velocity 75mm
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu AM 08:10:57 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu AM 06:54:38 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
The philosopher was Thomas Kuhn, professor at Berkley, California.
http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Kuhnsnap.html
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/
Jostein
Quoting Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I believe it is stated this way, Jostein:
The new way does not become the way until
Casting was more important than just for speed of production, (which is
debatable, complex castings
can be a bi***), using cast steel rather than stamped and welded steel
plates for armor made for a more stronger
hull with fewer weak points, (up until very recently, say about 40 years
ago
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu PM 01:29:35 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Casting was more important than just for speed of production, (which is
debatable, complex castings
can be a bi***), using cast
A politician can win the popular vote, and not be elected president. In fact it
is possible that someone who was not on the ballet could become president,
though that never has happened to my knowledge. What you really vote for is
something like which party gets to appoint the president. In
Actually it's the states who pick the President. The current system is
an approach used by the various state legislatures that approximates
direct elections. However the State Legislatures pick the way Electors
are selected under the federal constitution. The USA never was a
democracy at
Graywolf wrote:
A politician can win the popular vote, and not be elected president. In
fact it is possible that someone who was not on the ballet could become
president, though that never has happened to my knowledge. What you
really vote for is something like which party gets to appoint the
I think a republic does not have to be a democracy. A democracy on the other
hand pretty much has to be a republic if it is the government of much more than
a town. The way we elect the president in the US is diffinately not a
democratic process.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
SNIP
You're looking at this from the US viewpoint, Paul (and I can't blame
you for that). From the
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John,
This is a photography list.
Take your food-talk elsewhere, please. It's only going to start
another flame-war...
LOL.
But you have to break eggs to make an omelette. :-)
Jostein
(this is becoming entertaining again!)
Thanks, Frank.
As you say, the enemy of the cold war era was dismantled in the eighties. IIRC,
Gorbatchev rose to power and started the glasnost exactly 20 years ago. That's
why I would call it an anachronism.
One science philosopher (his name escapes me at the moment) claim that
scientific
Hi,
In a democracy, the
majority rules. The minority has no rights under the law.
The United
States of America is not a democracy. It is a republic. snip
With the greatest of respect, Tom, it seems to me that you
(or those who share your viewpoint) are making up definitions
to
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, William Robb wrote:
The Queen provides a last resort to reign in an out of control
situation in Parliament, or an out of control government.
That's right, the Queen has almost no power except for the right to
dismiss 'her' government and call for a general election.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, John Francis wrote:
frank theriault mused:
But if England and Canada aren't democracies by
your definition (since their constitutions prevent the majority from
oppressing the minority), and they aren't republics (having a
non-elected monarch),
Frank theriault wrote something that I replied to and I cited a webpage
that discussed the difference between a democracy and a republic. I've
since taken a close look at the page and I realized that that page had a
political agenda. I did not cite that page to advance that political
agenda. I
On 4/27/05, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stenquist mused:
I don't know on what you base that comment, Paul. I don't know what
they considered themselves, but they were neither communists nor
Marxists.
I base that comment on the name that the Soviets gave to their
On 4/27/05, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, I have to take some issue with you on this paragraph. The USSR was
certainly not fighting the Nazis single-handed. You may recall that Britain
fought from September of 1939 until the German invasion of Russia in 1941
with no manpower
On 4/27/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have an agenda other than to point out the difference between a
republic and a democracy.snip
You coming to GFM this year, Tom? I seem to recall that you are. I
think we'll have a fun discussion over a beer or two, eh? vbg
cheers,
But I'm going to stop now. I'm happy to discuss this off-list from here on in.
Best news about this thread I've seen in several days! VBG
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 26, 2005 10:25 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT:
Quoting Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think a republic does not have to be a democracy. A democracy on the
other hand pretty much has to be a republic if it is the government of much
more than a town. The way we elect the president in the US is diffinately
not a democratic process.
As Frank
On 4/27/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'm going to stop now. I'm happy to discuss this off-list from here on
in.
Best news about this thread I've seen in several days! VBG
Yes, well, despite my best intentions, I apparently lied, having
posted some more this morning :-(
Frank Theriault asked:
You coming to GFM this year, Tom? I seem to recall that you are.
Indeed I am.
I think we'll have a fun discussion over a beer or two, eh? vbg
I think we'll have several of both. grbay (that acronym should keep
you busy for a little while)
Tom Reese
I've been following the political discussion and I need to say that I
think this list is not properly named. Instead the Pentax Discussion
Mailing List it should really be called the Pentax Digression Mailing
List. It wouldn't even change the initials, but it would so much more
accurately
Instead the Pentax Discussion Mailing List it should really be called the
Pentax Digression Mailing
List.
Or lately, - Political Discussion Mailing List.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Alan P. Hayes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 27, 2005 11:14 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I believe it is stated this way, Jostein:
The new way does not become the way until the last person who knew the old
way dies.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Jostein wrote:
Thanks, Frank.
As you say, the enemy of the cold war
Actually this has not been a political discussion as all.
We have be discussing definitions, not politics. With rare exceptions no one
has made claims of one of them being better than the other, only what the
differences are. It has been a most civil and interesting discussion. Most of
those
luben karavelov wrote:
Tom C wrote:
I have to type this quietly and in the dark. It seems to me,
especially since that day in 2001, that the USA has been marching
steadily towards becoming the USSA.
:)
When I was young (15 years old, in the end of communist regime)
everybody's wish was to
From the Soviet viewpoint, however, things look a bit
different. They just fought a war almost singe-handedly against the
war machine of Nazi Germany,
No the USA sent the Russians tons of SPAM to keep their troops alive, as
they were starving on the German front during the winter. Just a
Well, political philosophy, then. I'm really impressed by the ability
of people on this list to have an interesting and civil discussion
around topics that don't often lend themselves to cool consideration.
Most good lists are sustained by a fairly small group of posters,
it's a good bunch
Graywolf wrote:
I think a republic does not have to be a democracy. A democracy on the
other hand pretty much has to be a republic if it is the government of
much more than a town. The way we elect the president in the US is
diffinately not a democratic process.
graywolf
Why cetainly it is,
Alan P. Hayes wrote:
I've been following the political discussion and I need to say that I
think this list is not properly named. Instead the Pentax Discussion
Mailing List it should really be called the Pentax Digression Mailing
List. It wouldn't even change the initials, but it would so much
Are we through with this yet? Or do I have to go to the trouble of
devising a spam filter that blocks this thread while continuing to allow
ON TOPIC posts through? 150 messages a day is traffic enough, without
adding another 50 per day about world history and politics, IMNSHO.
You know, I never once have felt it my perogative to tell others what they
should discuss on the list. If it was overtly offensive, maybe I would.
But simply OT, no. Being on the list is like being in the world. Parts of
it we like, parts of it we don't.
That being said, your point is
Chris Stoddart mused:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, John Francis wrote:
frank theriault mused:
But if England and Canada aren't democracies by
your definition (since their constitutions prevent the majority from
oppressing the minority), and they aren't republics
On 27/4/05, David Oswald, discombobulated, unleashed:
Are we through with this yet? Or do I have to go to the trouble of
devising a spam filter that blocks this thread while continuing to allow
ON TOPIC posts through? 150 messages a day is traffic enough, without
adding another 50 per day
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
On 27/4/05, David Oswald, discombobulated, unleashed:
Are we through with this yet? Or do I have
At 16:50 2005.04.27 -0400, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:58:47 -0700
From: David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Keith Waley wrote:
I belong to another list that would certainly give THIS list a run for it's
money.
But, most of the rank liberal folks here would be loathe to even have me
pronounce it's name.
Don't you paint me with that wide pinko brush, you, you, deviant.
Tom C.
On 4/27/05, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we through with this yet? Or do I have to go to the trouble of
devising a spam filter that blocks this thread while continuing to allow
ON TOPIC posts through? 150 messages a day is traffic enough, without
adding another 50 per day about
On 4/27/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No the USA sent the Russians tons of SPAM to keep their troops alive, as
they were starving on the German front during the winter. Just a little
history.
I know that The West sent supplies to Russia. Canada sent tanks (I
believe a smallish
I understood that Frank. :) I just always like to get that bit about SPAM
in whenever I can. I probably shouldn't have started my post with the word
No, as that obviously led you to think I was disputing something when I
really wasn't Sorry.
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/27/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understood that Frank. :) I just always like to get that bit about SPAM
in whenever I can. I probably shouldn't have started my post with the word
No, as that obviously led you to think I was disputing something when I
really wasn't Sorry.
g
the US also sent virtually all of the trucks and much of the clothing. the
British took the same and also US tanks. the Soviets never cared for anyone
else's tanks, for good reason.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday,
It seems that the T34, (Russian), has a better reputation than it
deserves, it was simple and robust, packed a big punch and had armor
that would stand up to the main gun on a Panzer Mark IV. The Sherman
M1A[X] had also had armor designed to stand up to the Panzer Mark IV.
Unfortunately by
Russian tanks had wider tracks and less problems with muddy conditions than
American or British designs. also, they ran OK on much poorer quality fuel.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:00 PM
I think that free beer is a type of Freedom.
Your damn right it is, and down here in this bastion of
democracy people will fight to the death for it. ;)
ROFL ;~\
Honestly,
What *is* this thing about some americans and marxism? I thought this phobia was
a thing of the cold war in the sixties and seventies...
Jostein
Quoting Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.oekonux.org/texts/marketrelations.html
and there's more, if you want to
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/26 Tue AM 07:38:48 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Honestly,
What *is* this thing about some americans and marxism? I thought this phobia
was
a thing of the cold war in the
American Marxist phobia is actually more a thing of the fifties and
sixties. It's really quite dead. However, there are little pockets of
folks with rather extreme views who keep it alive in bits and pieces,
here and there. That's probably true of any system of beliefs anywhere
in the world.
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly,
What *is* this thing about some americans and marxism? I thought this phobia
was
a thing of the cold war in the sixties and seventies...
A lot of people (especially Americans) confuse Marxism with Soviet-style
communism (though why they should
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/26 Tue AM 11:20:07 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly,
What *is* this thing about some americans and marxism? I thought this phobia
was
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/26 Tue AM 11:20:07 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly,
What *is* this thing about some americans and
Frank Theriault wrote:
The word libertarian is a pretty wide-ranging one. Most people (I
would guess) think of it as a whacko-right thing, but many on the left
consider themselves to be leftist libertarians, Chomsky likely being
the best known.
Not disputing what you said, Glenn, just expanding
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
American Marxist phobia is actually more a thing of the fifties and
sixties. It's really quite dead. However, there are little pockets of
folks with rather extreme views who keep it alive in bits and pieces,
here and there. That's probably true
Quoting Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
American Marxist phobia is actually more a thing of the fifties and
sixties. It's really quite dead. However, there are little pockets of
folks with rather extreme views who keep it alive in bits and
Free Beer Tomorrow
Seen on the side of a bar in Savannah, Ga, a few weeks ago.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 26, 2005 2:56 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
I think that free beer is a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/26 Tue PM 01:13:20 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Quoting Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
American Marxist phobia is actually more a thing of
So where's the photo?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kenneth Waller
Free Beer Tomorrow
Seen on the side of a bar in Savannah, Ga, a few weeks ago.
So where's the photo?
Only in my mind. It's my reason to go back.
I saw it from the front seat of a Cab @ 65mph while on my way to the airport.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 26, 2005 9:47 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE:
Quoting Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
American Marxist phobia is actually more a thing of the fifties and
sixties. It's really quite dead. However, there are little pockets of
folks with rather extreme views who keep it alive in bits
Here in the US where they never had to live under the system you can
still find Marxists as well, spooky...
Jostein wrote:
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
American Marxist phobia is actually more a thing of the fifties and
sixties. It's really quite dead. However, there are little
taking a course in philosophy makes you a philosopher in the same way
taking a course in photography makes you a photographer.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
This begs a link:
http://www.authentichistory.com/images/1960s/treasure_chest/v17_02_03.html
:)
All I need to know about communism I learned from J. Edgar Hoover,
j
On 4/26/05, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
American Marxist phobia is
Collin,
May I humbly suggest that you pour out your rational and reasoned
concern about GPL software propagating marxist ideas somewhere else?
Dragging your religious views into it isn't exactly going to help your
case either.
best regards,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Collin
Thanks Albano. Very cool. I remember reading that comic book as a child in the
fifities. I think it was distributed in schools. The best part is where the
commies take Joe Kennedy's building for a government headquarters: the Chicago
Merchandise Mart. It ranks right up there with the classic
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I humbly suggest that you pour out your rational and reasoned
concern about GPL software propagating marxist ideas somewhere else?
Dragging your religious views into it isn't exactly going to help your
case either.
There's one thing that communism and
There's one thing that communism and Christianity have in common (and I
forget who said this, though it was in regards to Christianity): it
hasn't *failed*, it's never been tried!
:)
Quite true, most 'Christian' religions bely the claim and blatantly
disregard the prinicples of their so-called
Quoting Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Collin,
May I humbly suggest that you pour out your rational and reasoned
concern about GPL software propagating marxist ideas somewhere else?
Dragging your religious views into it isn't exactly going to help your
case either.
This hardly looks
This hardly looks fair, Jostein. Wasn't Collin commenting on other people's
posts, both about Marxism and Christianity?
I think he's as entitled to express his opinions on those subjects as
anyone
else, as long as he's being polite about it, which he was.
ERNR
The OT stuff is what keeps the list
ERNR
I think Collin brought up the subject by claiming that free software was
Marxist.
I don't know what the context was because he has a habit of creating new
subject lines, and not quoting the previous discussion.
John
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:39:11 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting
this *IS* religion.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
A lot
better than this Film is Dead rubbish. ;)
Haha!
Tom C.
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:09:47 -0400
this *IS* religion.
Herb
- Original Message - From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi,
The revolutionary era of the 60s stood out because of the
violence. Maybe more recently people have heard of the
Shining Path Castro.
Just because they call themselves Marxists, doesn't mean they are.
Do you think the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda is doing the work
of the
ERN,
I totally agree that everyone is entitled to an opinion. Since this
thread goes on, I will post once more.
Collin was quite clear about his opinions when he started this thread,
and did not refer to any other thread in this forum. Knowing us, I'd
say there probably was a reference, but
Just because they took the door off the closet, don't mean the bogeyman is gone.
GRIN!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Jostein wrote:
Honestly,
What *is* this thing about some americans and marxism? I thought this phobia was
a
Bob W wrote:
...Is the USA not a democracy?
Not by the strict definition of democracy. It is a system of government
where the majority of the people make the rules for everyone. Here is a
site discussing the differences:
http://www.chrononhotonthologos.com/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm
The United
No, to be a photographer you have to buy a camera.
What do you have to buy to be a philosopher?
GRIN!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Doug Brewer wrote:
taking a course in philosophy makes you a philosopher in the same way
On 4/26/05, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
taking a course in philosophy makes you a philosopher in the same way
taking a course in photography makes you a photographer.
Funny. I majored in philosophy in University. I forget most of it.
I'm not a philosopher.
I've never taken a
On 4/26/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. A lot
better than this Film is Dead rubbish. ;)
Hey! I resemble that!
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi,
...Is the USA not a democracy?
Not by the strict definition of democracy. It is a system of
government where the majority of the people make the rules
for everyone. Here is a site discussing the differences:
http://www.chrononhotonthologos.com/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm
The United
On 4/26/05, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
American Marxist phobia is actually more a thing of the fifties and
sixties. It's really quite dead. However, there are little pockets of
folks with rather extreme views who keep it alive in bits
On 4/26/05, Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obfuscating the discussion by talking about free beer only avoids the
issue. snip
Maybe that's why some of us are talking about free beer...
LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Bob W wrote:
These definitions seem rather narrow to me, and are perhaps more specific
to
the situation in the USA than to the rest of the world. 'Republic' seems to
have several definitions, of which the most common is 'not a monarchy'.
Certainly the definition you have given does not sit well
Batter is made from flour, eggs and water. Pasta is made from
flour, eggs and water. But they're different things. Kerry
and Bush no doubt shared plenty of ideas with each other, and
with socialists and with the Monster Raving Loony Party. But
they're all different parties.
There
- Original Message -
From: Juan Buhler
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
This begs a link:
http://www.authentichistory.com/images/1960s/treasure_chest/v17_02_03.html
That would be funny if it wasn't so obviously some sort of half assed
propoganda. Who authored that
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: RE: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Bob W wrote:
...Is the USA not a democracy?
Not by the strict definition of democracy. It is a system of government
where the majority of the people make the rules for everyone.
Were it only
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
I think he's as entitled to express his opinions on those subjects as
anyone
else, as long as he's being polite about it, which he was.
If you want to get technical, this is a
No. There don't have to be eggs in pasta, but the nicest pasta (IMO)
certainly includes eggs.
John
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:49:54 +0100, Leon Mlakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Batter is made from flour, eggs and water. Pasta is made from
flour, eggs and water. But they're different things. Kerry
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: RE: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Both major political parties are whorses of a different color, but they're
both horses. It's one of the reasons why no noticeable improvement
occurs.
Please clarify, are they whores or ruminants?
On 4/26/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. There don't have to be eggs in pasta, but the nicest pasta (IMO)
certainly includes eggs.
John,
This is a photography list.
Take your food-talk elsewhere, please. It's only going to start
another flame-war...
g
cheers,
frank
--
Give Mr. Robb the grand prize and a big pat on the back for finding the
secret clue!
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Take a course in philosophy, will ya.
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:00:37 -0600
-
The ruling party of the USSR certainly considered themselves
communists. Whether they lived up to the ideals of communism is another
thing. The arms race wasn't a plot. No one was pleased when the Soviets
learned to make nuclear weapons. The growth of the US economy following
the war was far
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
