John, in Lightroom Classic, select, e.g., all your Iraq time zoned images.
Under Metadata menu, choose Edit Capture Time. The sub menu offers the option
to do a time zone adjustment. There is a warning that you cannot UnDo any
change. That is only somewhat true. You won’t have an UnDo option
> On 26 Jan 2024, at 20:00, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> I have a hard time even remembering to "Spring Forward/Fall Back" ... the
> "fall back" part isn't that big of a problem, but the week after "spring
> forward" I'd be late for my own hanging.
It seems to me that that would be a good thing…
John Sessoms wrote:
>What I've got is I got the *ist-D early in 2004 and set the time to "New
>York" (aka Eastern US time zone) and shipped out to Iraq a couple of
>weeks later.
>
>I didn't notice the time zone setting until I'd been in country for
>several months. And after I did notice, I
On 1/23/2024 8:42 AM, Bob W PDML wrote:
On 23 Jan 2024, at 13:30, John Sessoms wrote:
[…]
I'll have to think about changing over to UTC.
At least then ALL of the times will be "WRONG", rather than just blocks of them.
It doesn’t have to be UTC of course - it could be any time you
Just found a K-3ii with fewer than 3500 shutter actuations on eBay. I
should have it some time next week.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
> On 23 Jan 2024, at 01:54, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
> Hmm. I like to keep the camera's date setting current, but rarely ever look
> at the time my cameras are set to.
> I order things in LR by frame number, not by time, and only very very
> occasionally use more than one camera at a
> On 23 Jan 2024, at 13:30, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>
>
> […]
> I'll have to think about changing over to UTC.
>
> At least then ALL of the times will be "WRONG", rather than just blocks of
> them.
>
It doesn’t have to be UTC of course - it could be any time you choose as the
reference
On 1/22/2024 5:07 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
On 22 Jan 2024, at 21:36, John Sessoms wrote:
Can it reset the clock to LOCAL time?
That's the biggest problem I have with the clock - traveling to a different time zone and forgetting to set
the camera's clock to the correct time zone, i.e. I
> On Jan 22, 2024, at 2:07 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jan 2024, at 21:36, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>> Can it reset the clock to LOCAL time?
>>
>> That's the biggest problem I have with the clock - traveling to a different
>> time zone and forgetting to set the camera's clock to the
> On Jan 22, 2024, at 2:07 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jan 2024, at 21:36, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Can it reset the clock to LOCAL time?
>>
>> That's the biggest problem I have with the clock - traveling to a different
>> time zone and forgetting to set the camera's clock
Stanley Halpin wrote:
>Long ago and far away (specifically, Northern Italy, 2007) I took a drive from
>our B lodging around Lago Garda, a beautiful region favored as a vacation
>spot since the Middle Ages if not earlier. Several small fishing villages
>around the lake. I of course stopped at
> On Jan 22, 2024, at 4:36 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> On 1/22/2024 2:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>> On Jan 21, 2024, at 11:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't NEED it, but if I have it built into the camera I don't have to
>>> fiddle with the phone whenever I want to use it.
>>>
>>>
> On 22 Jan 2024, at 21:36, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>
>
> Can it reset the clock to LOCAL time?
>
> That's the biggest problem I have with the clock - traveling to a different
> time zone and forgetting to set the camera's clock to the correct time zone,
> i.e. I have the camera set to "New
On 1/22/2024 2:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 21, 2024, at 11:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I don't NEED it, but if I have it built into the camera I don't have to fiddle
with the phone whenever I want to use it.
I don't use it often, but occasionally I'll want to know where I was (in
Mark!
Oh damn.
As you were.
Cot
> On 20 Jan 2024, at 16:32, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> I tend to agree with Paul on this
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
A number of interesting answers to the "why GPS" question, thank you.
From the answers, I think my long-held workflow practices from non-GPS equipped
cameras manage to do the same job … when traveling, I keep a journal and update
it daily with the names and places of everywhere I've visited,
Long ago and far away (specifically, Northern Italy, 2007) I took a drive from
our B lodging around Lago Garda, a beautiful region favored as a vacation
spot since the Middle Ages if not earlier. Several small fishing villages
around the lake. I of course stopped at every village and took shots
I keep the GPS of my K-1 always on so I don't forget to switch it on.
How much faster this drains my battery, I have no idea.
After a day trip I take the SD card out and also recharge the battery.
Almost never need a spare battery.
Henk
Op 2024-01-22 om 12:04 schreef Bob W PDML:
I can see the
I can see the value of it even if it’s something that I don’t have much need
for personally.
To me it would be quite useful sometimes for a camera to connect automatically
(ie without all the ridiculous faff of camera WiFi connections) using Bluetooth
or Ant+ or something similar to external
Am 22.01.24 um 00:08 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi:
S … All this discussion of GPS equipped cameras … I'm curious: Why do we
need GPS location information in our photographs?
Now, that's an easy one...
Whenever I'm looking for a photo of a particular place or subject to
accompany one of my
Van: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Verzonden: maandag 22 januari 2024 00:08
Aan: PDML
Onderwerp: Re: Pentax APS-C cameras
S … All this discussion of GPS equipped cameras … I'm curious: Why do we
need GPS location information in our photographs?
Oh, I can see some uses for it, for specific purposes
> On Jan 21, 2024, at 11:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> I don't NEED it, but if I have it built into the camera I don't have to
> fiddle with the phone whenever I want to use it.
>
> I don't use it often, but occasionally I'll want to know where I was (in more
> than a general way) when I
> On Jan 21, 2024, at 11:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> I don't NEED it, but if I have it built into the camera I don't have to
> fiddle with the phone whenever I want to use it.
>
> I don't use it often, but occasionally I'll want to know where I was (in more
> than a general way) when I
I don't NEED it, but if I have it built into the camera I don't have to
fiddle with the phone whenever I want to use it.
I don't use it often, but occasionally I'll want to know where I was (in
more than a general way) when I took a photo.
On 1/21/2024 6:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
S
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think any of
the APS-C cameras have built in GPS.
According to Ricoh, the K-3/K-3 Mark III, K-5/K-5II/K-5IIs can take the
O-GPS1 module - discontinued according to Ricoh, but if you don't
already have it you can probably find one NOS
S … All this discussion of GPS equipped cameras … I'm curious: Why do we
need GPS location information in our photographs?
Oh, I can see some uses for it, for specific purposes, but in general … I don't
know why I'd want it.
I figure when I want GPS location info, I just snap a photo with
On 1/21/2024 4:33 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Good choice, saving the fuzz with handling of the coordinates.
Would also be my choice, however the K-3II is not compatible with my
favourite lens, the quiet 55-300 PLM version.
The GPS data I need are essential for identification and reporting of
Correction: the 55-300 PLM can be used on the K-3II with updated firmware.
Henk
Op 2024-01-21 om 11:33 schreef Henk Terhell:
Good choice, saving the fuzz with handling of the coordinates.
Would also be my choice, however the K-3II is not compatible with my
favourite lens, the quiet 55-300 PLM
I have a clip-on O-GPS1 which can I use on my trusty K5. Very small &
easy to use for GPS.
Alan C
On 20-Jan-24 10:41 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 20.01.24 um 21:30 schrieb Larry Colen:
I recently picked up one of these for my bike rides. It does a nice
job of logging my rides and
Good choice, saving the fuzz with handling of the coordinates.
Would also be my choice, however the K-3II is not compatible with my
favourite lens, the quiet 55-300 PLM version.
The GPS data I need are essential for identification and reporting of
species in the field. There is a phone app for
Am 20.01.24 um 21:30 schrieb Larry Colen:
I recently picked up one of these for my bike rides. It does a nice job of
logging my rides and doesn't wear my phone batteries down the way trying to use
the phone GPS apps does.
https://ride.lezyne.com/products/mega-xl-gps
It would be wonderful if
> On Jan 20, 2024, at 12:14 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>
> Am 20.01.24 um 11:02 I wrote:
>> I've been using a portable Garmin device that I carry (or rather drive)
>> along to record my itinerary.
>
> There were/are also the so-called GPS mice, e.g. the XAiOX iTrackU, small and
>
Am 20.01.24 um 11:02 I wrote:
I've been using a portable Garmin device that I carry (or rather
drive) along to record my itinerary.
There were/are also the so-called GPS mice, e.g. the XAiOX iTrackU,
small and light-weight devices the size of a mini mouse, logging your
itinerary for later
Alan C wrote:
>It seem only the K3ii has built in GPS like the K1.
All right, so the K-3ii it is, then.
A quick look around the web shows they seem to be holding their value
pretty well, which is a good sign.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to
Henk: smartphones are centered on communications technology, where cameras
generally are not. Thus the difference … a difference in engineering/design
focus.
I tend to agree with Paul on this, however: My favorite cycling camera is my
now-ancient Light L16. It's like carrying a large cell
For a bicycle trip all one really needs is a top of the line phone. In good
light and with the lens clean (very important with a phone) my iphone 12 pro
mac is nearly as good as my Pentax K3, and an iphone 15 pro max is several
generations better. And of course it privides GPS and great mapping
Am 20.01.24 um 10:37 schrieb Henk Terhell:
For me it is incomprehensible that all smartphones have GPS but most
DSLRs and mirrorless not.
Might have something to do with battery life, but I'm just guessing.
I've been using a portable Garmin device that I carry (or rather drive)
along to
For me it is incomprehensible that all smartphones have GPS but most
DSLRs and mirrorless not. For landscape and nature pictures it is so
useful to have it on my K-1. If GPS seems to easily fit in a flat phone,
why not in an APSC-C? For me this is another step forward to kill real
cameras
It seems that the only ones with internal GPS are the K-1, and the K-3II
There might be some mode where you can use the gps off the phone through the
app on the K-3 III. Or that might be something that I saw my u4/3 can
theoretically do.
What I have been doing on the K-3 III is just taking
Sorry, none of those - they all need the clip-on O-GPS1 as do the K3i &
K3iii, K5 series & a few others.
It seem only the K3ii has built in GPS like the K1.
Alan C
On 20-Jan-24 06:30 AM, Alan C wrote:
https://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=pentax_k70=pentax_kf=pentax_kp=pentax_ks2
Alan C
On 20-Jan-24 01:37 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
What is the most recent Pentax APS-C camera that has built-in GPS like
the K-1? We're doing another bicycle trip in the summer and I'd
41 matches
Mail list logo
