Enjoy! Looking forward to seeing the snaps.
> On 19 Jan 2020, at 09:20, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> https://youtu.be/qya4yJ4UjRk
>
> Sailing on our Caribbean cruise today. My camera kit for this trip is an
> iPhone 8 Plus, a couple of Moment accessory lenses, a Polaroid SX-70, and a
> Peak
https://youtu.be/qya4yJ4UjRk
Sailing on our Caribbean cruise today. My camera kit for this trip is an iPhone
8 Plus, a couple of Moment accessory lenses, a Polaroid SX-70, and a Peak
Design Travel Tripod.
G
—
No matter where you go, dance like nobody’s watching.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
and purchase a brand new Spotmatic F
kit for half price, wouldn't you do it? Well, that's the opportunity
right here:
I can't bring myself to split this gorgeous kit up, so it is being
sold complete (for less than the individual parts are worth).
• Genuine Pentax Travel Kit hard case with green
this gorgeous kit up, so it is being
sold complete (for less than the individual parts are worth).
• Genuine Pentax Travel Kit hard case with green foam interior.
• Spotmatic F (everything works like new, including metering)
• SMC Takumar 55mm f1.8 with original cap (flawless) on camera
• Super
).
• Genuine Pentax Travel Kit hard case with green foam interior.
• Spotmatic F (everything works like new, including metering)
• SMC Takumar 55mm f1.8 with original cap (flawless) on camera
• Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f2.5 with original front and rear
caps and matching metal screw
).
• Genuine Pentax Travel Kit hard case with green foam interior.
• Spotmatic F (everything works like new, including metering)
• SMC Takumar 55mm f1.8 with original cap (flawless) on camera
• Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f2.5 with original front and rear
caps and matching metal screw-in hood
-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Charles
Robinson [charl...@visi.com]
Sent: 22 March 2009 01:33
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
Stan Halpin wrote:
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...snippage
Be a man. One camera, one lens. K20D and FA35/2.
you know you want to.
I do believe that sounds like a dare.
--
On Mar 22, 2009, at 4:53, John Whittingham wrote:
Hi Charles
That does look quite unusual, especially for a lens stopped down @ f/
5.6. I have to shoot large groups once a year for my employer. the
16-50 would be my choice of lens this year, now I'm having some
reservations.
It's been
-Discuss Mail List
JW Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
JW On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50
files. On the other hand, many FA lenses seem prone to CA when used
in digital applications. However, I have to admit
John, I suspect that if your lens doesn't produce excessive CA in
normal use it won't suddenly succumb to the pressure of shooting a
group:-)
On Mar 22, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 22, 2009, at 4:53, John Whittingham wrote:
Hi Charles
That does look quite unusual,
...@daytonphoto.com]
Sent: 22 March 2009 16:34
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
Hello John,
it is pretty simple to test your lens. Many of us, myself included
use the lens extensively without seeing the problem that Charles had.
It appears to be his particular
List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
John, I suspect that if your lens doesn't produce excessive CA in
normal use it won't suddenly succumb to the pressure of shooting a
group:-)
On Mar 22, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 22, 2009, at 4:53, John Whittingham wrote:
Hi
On Mar 22, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com
wrote:
Stan Halpin wrote:
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...snippage
Be a man. One camera, one lens. K20D and FA35/2.
you know you
On Mar 20, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
What I have to choose from:
14/2.8
21/3.2
43/1.9
A50/1.2
A50/1.4
77/1.8
100/2.8 Macro
K135/2.5 or M135/3.5
16-50/2.8
50-135/2.8
Of those choices, I'd carry the DA21, FA43 and 50-135. Add the DA14 if
you really love doing extreme wide
Stan, it is hard for me to get a comprehensive idea of your shooting
style without having actually seen you shoot. For my style, I'd go with
DA 21, FA 43 and FA 77. This is in fact, exactly the set of lenses I
took with me with me on last year's trip to Belgium and Holland. I had
once a
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...
In 3 weeks or so I will be going to Rome with my wife for a short
week. (5.5 days on the ground.) I am trying to decide what camera
gear to take with me.
[...]
Options I have thought of:
1. 16-50/2.8
On 21/3/09, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think the backpack idea is distinctly subprime for working out of
Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
the superiority of primes. I would also leave the spare body in my
luggage.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 3/21/09, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
Subject: Lens travel kit dilemma
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML
I would definitely go with the 16-50/2.8 and the 50-135/2.8. They're
fast and perform as well as most primes. You get good coverage with
fewer lenses. The 26-50 will give near macro focus for details.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2009, at 1:23 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Re-visiting a topic that has been
BTW, both autofocus better than the non-USM lenses.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I would definitely go with the 16-50/2.8 and the 50-135/2.8. They're
fast and perform as well as most primes. You get good coverage with
fewer lenses. The 26-50 will give near macro
Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
Subject: Lens travel kit dilemma
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 1:23 AM
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on
before on the list...
In 3 weeks or so I will be going to Rome with my wife for a
short
2009/3/21 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Call me a lazy slacker
Rick you lazy slacker...
Stan, I agree with Rick. Take the 16-50mm 50-135mm.
When I play tourist the 16-45/16-50mm focal length is always my most used lens
I'd also add the 21mm f3.2 for when you want to to travel small
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:54 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/21 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Call me a lazy slacker
Rick you lazy slacker...
Stan, I agree with Rick. Take the 16-50mm 50-135mm.
When I play tourist the 16-45/16-50mm focal length is always my most used
On Mar 21, 2009, at 4:38, Rick Womer wrote:
So, Stan, are you traveling to see things, eat good food, and take
pictures, or are you traveling for lens-swapping exercise?
Call me a lazy slacker, but I would take the two zooms and the super-
wide. Those are such good lenses that you would
Stan Halpin wrote:
16-50/2.8
50-135/2.8
If it were me, that'd be my kit ... those two lenses and one body, or
maybe two. I don't like looking festooned with camera gear when I'm
out sightseeing and I don't want to have to fuss with a bunch of
different primes. Light, fast, unobtrusive.
rationale:
The reason for my kit suggestion is that I intensely dislike shooting
with wide-normal-portrait zooms. I find their imaging qualities and
bulk get in my way a lot of the time.
The 16-50/2.8 is extremely bulky and very heavy compared to the DA21
and FA43. The two short primes
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
rationale:
I also find that if I carry more than three or four lenses, I'm wasting
my time trying to decide what to use. I lose picture opportunities that
way. And I hate carrying all that bulk. Three lenses and a light tripod
do MUCH more than five-six lenses for me.
Hi Stan,
I would carry 21mm, 50-135mm and one other prime (35mm, or 43mm in your case).
OT: I would also think what filters you want (polarizer for sure, uv
for protection, may be even graduated nd?) It is good then your
lenses can share some filters.
I I were you I would scan through your recent
The size and bulk of the DA* 16-50 aren't an obstacle for me. When
shooting with a K20D with battery grip attached, it actually provides
better balance than smaller lenses. And while I don't have an FA 43
with which to compare it, I can say with certainty that its image
quality is better
So much has been thrown your way by now, your brain is probably
reeling. I know mine is.
Go for a X70 and carry nothing else but a half dozen 8 gig SDHC cards.
Shoot HD movies when appropriate. Spend more time at the computer post-
processing than the length of your vacation. :-)
Ah, but I bought the grip for the K10D and hated the additional weight
and bulk of that too. I used it once, to test it, and sold it a year
later.
Wide to portrait zooms just don't float my boat. The best one I've
ever had is the Vario-Elmarit-D 14-50/2.8-3.5 ASPH OIS that came with
the
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
[pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 17:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
The size and bulk of the DA* 16-50 aren't an obstacle for me. When
shooting with a K20D
Yes, it's all a matter of personal taste and shooting styles. Prior to
going digital, I was shooting most of my work with the 6x7, so size
has never been a serious consideration for me. (Ironically, my second
most-used camera at that time was the little Leica iiif.) More
importantly, I
...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist [pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 17:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
The size and bulk of the DA* 16-50 aren't an obstacle for me. When
shooting with a K20D with battery grip attached
Of Paul Stenquist
[pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 19:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
I have both as well. Shooting cars in continuous autofocus mode during
the dream cruise, it became obvious that the USM motor in the newer
lens was much more
Stan Halpin wrote:
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...
In 3 weeks or so I will be going to Rome with my wife for a short week.
(5.5 days on the ground.) I am trying to decide what camera gear to take
with me.
My standard two-lens kit is the DA*16-50
] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist [pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 19:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
I have both as well. Shooting cars in continuous autofocus mode during
the dream cruise, it became obvious that the USM motor in the newer
lens
On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50
files. On the other hand, many FA lenses seem prone to CA when used
in digital applications. However, I have to admit that I haven't
studied FA 35/2 results at a pixel level.
tentative travel kit, based on your comments and on this data:
1. Outdoor, streets and scenics: P = 50-135, S = 21
2. Indoors, churches and such: P = 77 , S = 16-50
3. Evening walking-around kit: S = 43 [unless I cannot resist the
temptation of the new 55/1.4!]
4. The 14 and 100 will stay home
Stan,
Excellent analysis of your usage.
Here's another question to consider if you want to dig into your data
a bit more, when you were using primes, how
often did you use them at an aperture that is wider than your zooms
would handle?
Another thing to consider is, if rather than looking at all
By the way Scott - great suggestion!
I can see it now:
a. Stan takes off a lens, asks for a different lens.
b. Street urchin/photo assistant hands him a lens, stashes the one
just replaced.
c. Stan concentrates on getting just the right framing and lighting
for the definitive photo of a
Proof positive that you were the proud owner of a broken lens.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50
files. On the other hand, many FA lenses seem prone to
Good question Larry. I'll look at that tomorrow.
stan
On Mar 21, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Stan,
Excellent analysis of your usage.
...
Another thing to consider is, if rather than looking at all of your
pictures, you just look at your favorite 20, or 50, which lenses did
you use?
Stan Halpin wrote:
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...snippage
Be a man. One camera, one lens. K20D and FA35/2.
you know you want to.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...
In 3 weeks or so I will be going to Rome with my wife for a short
week. (5.5 days on the ground.) I am trying to decide what camera
gear to take with me.
Some considerations:
a. Most of what I take should fit
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 12:23 AM
Subject: Lens travel kit dilemma
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...
In 3 weeks or so I
Good plan. I view feeling cheerful like a daily workout.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/22/2008 8:38 PM
Well, the sun is out (for the first time
Mail List'
Subject: RE: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
[snipped: totally biased and 1100% totally and utterly untrue and
totally unjust rant against the pearl of Australian cities and its
gentle folk obviously by some total drongo who knows totally stuff all
and nothing about culchah or totally
Sent: 23 April 2008 15:08
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Bob,
Good to see that you haven't lost your grasp on Aussie
badinage. BTW there
was a minor typo in your message. I'm certain you must have
intended, who
totally knows all stuff when you
Bob W a écrit :
[snipped: totally biased and 1100% totally and utterly untrue and
totally unjust rant against the pearl of Australian cities and its
gentle folk obviously by some total drongo who knows totally stuff all
and nothing about culchah or totally fine places and people
culchah
Can't see the sharks :-\ How disappointing !
dom from Paris, France
Anthony Farr a écrit :
Here's Melbourne's most famous beach:
http://tinyurl.com/5dk3x7
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
You're not supposed to...
Mme RD wrote:
Can't see the sharks :-\ How disappointing !
dom from Paris, France
Anthony Farr a écrit :
Here's Melbourne's most famous beach:
http://tinyurl.com/5dk3x7
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
-- Dr. Jerry
Mme RD wrote:
culchah ? ?? didn't learn that one at school ... :-D :-D
dom from Paris, France.
It's a phonetic spelling of culture, I think.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
: Wednesday, 23 April 2008 6:25 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
[snipped: totally biased and 1100% totally and utterly untrue and
totally unjust rant against the pearl of Australian cities and its
gentle folk obviously by some total drongo who knows totally
Dave,
It's a great idea. Lots of my lenses live and travel that way.
I'm on constant lookout for those soft rubber beer can holders.
Put your lens in one of those and it becomes indestructible!
No need to cut it down, just wrap a rubber band around over the top.
My FA50/1.4 has made several trips
How many do you need? They're available all over the place here :-)
Cheers,
Dave (I use then to keep my (soft) drinks cold :-)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
It's a great idea. Lots of my lenses live and travel that way.
I'm on constant
is the road. I offer Sputnikagency
as supporting evidence.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Doug Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, 22 April 2008 9:04 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Bob
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An Australian joke is that
the best thing to come out of Melbourne is the road. I offer Sputnikagency
as supporting evidence.
...I offer the Collingwood Football Club as supporting, supporting evidence.
:-D
Cheers,
as supporting evidence.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Doug Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, 22 April 2008 9:04 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Bob W wrote:
they're bending
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Bob W wrote:
they're bending over so far to be cool that they've disappeared
up
their own bags and turned themselves inside out.
I call that Brown Hole Syndrome. If you remember the
old Pink Panther
cartoon, there was an episode where
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
Doug Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, 22 April 2008 9:04 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Bob W wrote:
they're bending over so far to be cool that they've disappeared
up
their own bags and turned themselves inside
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:46:23 +1000, Anthony Farr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Imagine my lack of surprise to see that their principal location is in
Melbourne, the self elected centre of everything in Australia. Just ask
a
Melbournian, they have the best restaurants, the best cafes, the best
On Apr 22, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Having said that, Sputnikagency is truly woeful.
www.sputnikagency.com
That's remarkably charitable of you. It's smeggin' garbage.
I'm shocked that they are actually in business.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well, the sun is out (for the first time for a few weeks) and I feel all
is right with the world
I'll return to 'grumpy old fart' mode tomorrow.
:-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On
On 20/4/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe, but is it too much to ask for a description other than I love
the chandelier for a
camera bag? Some decently sized pictures would be nice too.
Their website is better suited to Calvin and Susie's lemonade stand than
a manufacturer who
Cotty wrote:
On 20/4/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe, but is it too much to ask for a description other than I love
the chandelier for a
camera bag? Some decently sized pictures would be nice too.
Their website is better suited to Calvin and Susie's lemonade stand than
Damn, and I thought you were going to give it an award.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 20/4/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe, but is it too much to ask for a description other than I love
the chandelier for a
camera bag? Some decently sized pictures would
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 20/4/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe, but is it too much to ask for a description other than I love
the chandelier for a
camera bag? Some decently sized pictures would be nice too.
Their website is
Mark Roberts wrote:
It might get one. I'm going to nominate it (if it hasn't already won
this award already): http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/
Yes, Crumpler already received a Daily Sucker award from
webpagesthatsuck.com:
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/crumpler-commentary.html
Mark Roberts a écrit :
Annoying doesn't do it justice. I'm going to show that site in class
today as an example of How NOT To Design A Web Page.
Agreed . it's whacky and i did enjoy clicking around but it's useless
when it comes to getting useful information ... for ex I couldn't find
Maybe, but is it too much to ask for a description other
than I love
the chandelier for a
camera bag? Some decently sized pictures would be nice too.
Their website is better suited to Calvin and Susie's
lemonade stand than
a manufacturer who
wants to be taken seriously.
On 21/4/08, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
[about Crumpler]
they're bending over so far to be cool that they've disappeared up
their own bags and turned themselves inside out.
Hall of fame.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
On 21/4/08, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
[about Crumpler]
they're bending over so far to be cool that they've disappeared up
their own bags and turned themselves inside out.
Hall of fame.
Mark!
True :)
Ever find yourself browsing through PDML posts and reading
Speaking of web sites that suck, I just paid a visit to Web Pages that
Suck and discovered that they don't have an easy search facility on
site. Now that strikes me as a point of suckyness in and of itself on a
web site dedicated to learning web design by example.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty
Bob W wrote:
they're bending over so far to be cool that they've disappeared up
their own bags and turned themselves inside out.
I call that Brown Hole Syndrome. If you remember the old Pink Panther
cartoon, there was an episode where Pink was using a vacuum cleaner, and
ended up sucking up
I've got a few Pentax branded bags that I have bought cheaply along the way.
This one:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=270225817282ssPageNam
e=ADME:B:EOIBSA:AU:1123
is just the right size for an LX plus 24,30,35,50,85 and 135 lenses plus a
few rolls of film and a couple of
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Paul Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the
lenses are protected with cut down stubby holders which are just the right
diameter for most of the M series primes.
LOL
My old man does the same thing to protect his Minolta Nikkormat kit.
Cheers,
Dave
--
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously like a camera bag.
Cheers,
Dave
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I
,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry it, preferably one over the shoulder any
suggestions.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Bag for Travel Kit
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry it, preferably one over the
shoulder any
suggestions.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Charles Wilson escribió:
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry it, preferably one over the shoulder any
suggestions.
When I carry a light kit, I use a Tamrac Adventure Messenger 4
Charles Wilson wrote:
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry it, preferably one over the shoulder any
suggestions.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
They might be a touch
Mail List
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Charles Wilson wrote:
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry it, preferably one over the shoulder
any
suggestions.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Something that doesn't look like a photo bag, or like you're carrying
anything more important in it than your lunch, (without wine).
Charles Wilson wrote:
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry
Charles Wilson wrote:
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry it, preferably one over the
shoulder any
suggestions.
That will all fit nicely into a Domke F803 Camera Satchel, Think Tank
Urban
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously like a camera bag.
Their USA website doesn't look so obviously like they want to pass on any
information.
http
lenses.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wilson
Sent: 20 April 2008 06:57
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus
Agreed. I hate the crumpler website with a passion... It's a good
reason to me to avoid their products.
Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com
On Apr 20, 2008, at 8:22 AM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Wilson
Sent: 20 April 2008 06:57
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need a travel bag to carry it, preferably one over the
shoulder any
suggestions.
Regards
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wilson
Sent: 20 April 2008 06:57
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Dear All,
I'm deciding to use the following as a travel kit
DA 14, DA 21, FA 43 and FA77 plus ist D
I now need
Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously like a camera bag.
Their USA website doesn't look so obviously like they want to pass
on any information.
http://www.crumplerbags.com
Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously like a camera bag.
Their USA website doesn't look so obviously like they want to pass
on any information.
http://www.crumplerbags.com/index.php
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:22 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously like a camera bag.
Their USA website
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously like a camera bag.
Their USA website doesn't look so obviously like they want
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The F5XB is too small for that kit. It would work without the 14mm but
not with it. The F5XC would fit it nicely... But I think the F6 is a
better choice, or the F803.
You're right. When I first read Charles' post I thought 3 pancakes and
a 77. That should fit
.
Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com
On Apr 20, 2008, at 8:22 AM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously
Mail List
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Bob W wrote:
Domke F-2. Still the best camera bag ever made.
http://www.tiffen.com/displayproduct.html?tablename=domkeitemnum=700-
02S
Ack! That's a big bag for such a small kit. Look at the F-X5B.
You
can get all your kit
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Don't judge a book by it's cover...
Honestly Dave, the products may be fine, but their website is really
information lite and
annoyance heavy, unless you happen to be 14 years old, in which case it may
- www.gdgphoto.com
On Apr 20, 2008, at 8:22 AM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Camera Bag for Travel Kit
Crumpler 5 or 6 Million Dollar Home.
They're products don't look so obviously like a camera bag
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
