Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa / wrote:
Just a funny old picture I found in my hd. Comments welcome.
http://www.jbuhler.com/tmp/ca99-0533.jpg
:-)
Is it art?
I think it is.
And a thought: egg-heads are about to overflow the world! :-)
(I'm probably one of them - studying
In a message dated 11/20/01 8:12:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mafud,
Do you think, perhaps, that it's KODAK's game you are playing? I say this
in half-jest, half-seriousness.
Any professional, in any field, will be known for many attributes, one of
them is
In a message dated 11/20/01 9:24:18 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mafud, lets do try to keep it professional, shall
we?
What ~are~ you referring to?
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
In a message dated 11/20/01 11:17:58 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
? I think just about everything computer has turned to junk
in the last few years, or atleast on the PC side of things. But one thing
is definently true about computers, you get what you pay for.
Oh, have you written one?
Sac No, my Brother. It is currently out of print for revisions and updates.
Sac If you like, I'll have him contact you when the revamp is done. Last revision
Sac was $5.95 SH included.
Sac And the copyrighted name for it is:
Sac Manual Fill Flash For Dummies.
Sac
Cracked me up!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: Is it art?
Just a funny old picture I found in my hd. Comments welcome.
http://www.jbuhler.com/tmp/ca99-0533.jpg
:-)
In a message dated 11/20/01 11:21:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I had access to the newer Supra/Portra 800
I suspect I would find one or both of them more to my liking, tho.
Hey Bill!
I shoot a ~lot~ of PORTRA 800 (NC). Of course the next suggestion is
Ed wrote
There is no MZ-S anywhere in Baltimore - I
called every dealer. I managed to find one in DC on Tuesday, at the
largest Pentax dealer in the DC area. They had one. None of the
salespeople had ever even heard of it, and they could not find it for
about 5 minutes, because it was still
Tom R. wrote:
To paraphrase and old saying; figures don't lie, but salesmen do figure.
First of all, Tom, I'm not a salesman, not in any way, shape, or form. I
have no connection, official or unofficial, to any company and no financial
interest at all in selling anything except my little
-- Original Message --
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And second, I now hold in my hot little hands an actual
Pentax Optio 430, which means I will very soon begin
belaboring the list with a multi-part preview, as part of
which I will be
In a message dated 11/21/01 4:29:40 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now tell me I'm not running cheaper than you are. I think everything
considered it's a _lot_ cheaper.
--Mike
P.S. To Mafud's earlier comment that I'm running through AA alkalines at a
steady clip,
aimcompute wrote:
Stingray by Dan Matyola
I have an affinity for Stingrays (I've always admired the '63 with the wrap
around rear window). I smiled back upon seeing this. What is the texture
covering the picture? Was it the plastic you were shooting through?
Thanks for your comments.
On Wednesday, November 21, 2001, at 03:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJI lead the charge into saturated emulsions and KODAK stupidly
followed.
I know you know this already, but here goes anyway: I personally don't
know
of any (ANY) FUJI emulsion which can faithfully reproduce the skin
On Tuesday, November 20, 2001, at 12:03 PM, aimcompute wrote:
Thanks Shel. I'll look into these.
I've got two Cabin panels, one 4x5 (actually mine) and one 11x14 (which
belongs to the store). They're gorgeous.
A customer was in with a small Gepe panel the other day, which seemed
very
In a message dated 11/21/01 8:41:22 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Where? Sheesh, they cost us $11.25 wholesale.
-Aaron
Four packs (three plus one free) cost $9US any Walmart.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Reminds me of when my kids were little at Christmas time and would push
the toy aside and play with the box ;-)
On Tuesday 20 November 2001 22:56, Paul M. Provencher wrote:
Well the hood comes with case and box. I know it's a stretch but
that's what I see there.
ppro
--
Kenneth Archer +
While there are people using it in both larger format groups the same can be
said for it's effect in 35mm. My brother, Kirk, the professional, who shoots
mainly 4x5 and some Hassy MF, has taught classes in LF and MF digital, and
teaches the Zone System at both UNM and occasionally at the Art
Unfortunately, AFAIK, this doesn't apply to amateurs
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every object/item you buy depreciates. Every shot you make further
depreciates your set-up. The set-up thus has to be replaced, probably at
the
same or higher value. At that point, and unless you don't intend
The main problem with the Kendrick is the amount of residual heated air in
the area of the objective. People in the astro community often mention one
of my quotes about Kendrick. Their products are $50 solutions to $5
problems. He saw a problem and came up with an expensive way to fix it is a
way
Actually the printer he mentioned for $49 I think was one that used to cost
around $299 at one time unless I'm mistaken (not as familiar with Epson as I
am with Canon and HP).
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lon Williamson
I have a drawer full of converters including both current Sigma EX ones, a
couple of older 1.4x ones, several rebadged Kenkos, a couple of Tamron ones
and the Pentax 1.7x AF. I put the Sigma EX at the top for performance, then
the Pentax and the older Sigma ones which are close and the Kenko near
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: Digital cameras are FREE
In a message dated 11/21/01 4:29:40 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because you are paying for film.
And your
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Digital cameras are FREE
__
Mike, as long as you have to replace supplies and depreciate
equipment, it is
costing
In a message dated 11/21/01 8:45:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
If you haven't shot it, Mafud, I think you really owe it to yourself to
try a roll of either NPS or NPH from Fuji. They are gorgeous, smooth,
natural, low contrast negative films, with exceptionally
In a message dated 11/21/01 9:06:59 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, AFAIK, this doesn't apply to amateurs
But hey, we all know that in the heart of every amateur beats the heart of a
pro. :))
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is
In a message dated 11/21/2001 9:33:25 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But hey, we all know that in the heart of every amateur beats the heart of
a
pro. :))
Nonsense.
Ed M.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Why Kodak Gold Max is evil?
In a message dated 11/21/01 8:41:22 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Where? Sheesh, they cost us $11.25
In a message dated 11/21/01 9:07:19 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
He says that without much exception his major architectural clients are not
happy with the amount of info captured by 16 MP digital backs when a good
4x5 film plate can get more than 64 MP when scanned
In a message dated 11/21/01 9:25:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm, doesn't a conventional camera depreciate as well?
William Robb
Yup. But at some point, the depreciation stops but the camera is still
useful. Witness the number of 30 plus year-old PENTAX horses
11MP in MF is starting to sound better and better.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brendan
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Philips has announced a 11 Megapixel chip
for mid '02
Actually unless they have changed the rules the seller in an auction without
a reserve is allowed to bid once to mach sure he doesn't have to sell it at
some ridiculously low price. And that uses some kind of generic account and
he can only do it once.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
They have one the RD-3000. 2.7 MP and can use every lens in the lineup
except the 400mm prime. All are zooms except for a 50mm Macro lens. SCSI
interface and has some improvements over the 35mm based RD-175.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Well, I finally went out and shelled out $21 for a Hewes developing reel -
about $10 more than the ones I previously purchased. All I can say is WOW
what a difference! Rolling the film on there the first time was like
buttah. Every neg came out and I am extremely pleased.
Thanks again to all
280T is a poor choice if you need macro, although if you take it off the hot
shoe and mount it closer you might have good results.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pawel Czarnul
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:53 PM
To:
I've found that regardless of the printer one color always runs out well
before the others. So I'm in the market for one with individual cartridges.
So far I've only seen Canon's starting with the 8200 and later. Didn't know
about the Epson C80.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From:
Amen on that. Nothing beats a clone you have built and modified yourself.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The true cost of free
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Digital cameras are FREE
In a message dated 11/21/01 9:25:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm, doesn't a conventional camera
Yes, it does - as do all consumables. Perhaps the point to be
considered is not so much monetary depreciation, as obsolescence. Thus
far, even old cameras, while ~maybe~ not being worth as much as when
new, are still able to function well and make good photographs. IOW,
it's a mature
- Original Message -
From: Kent Gittings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:09 AM
Subject: RE: Photo printers
I've found that regardless of the printer one color always
runs out well
before the others. So I'm in the market for one with
Yeah but if in 30 years there is no more film you can still use a digital
camera.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digital
I've never used these guys but they come across my deal newsletters
frequently.
http://www.ink4art.com/icon/index.asp?method=pspss=c80
Delano
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:18:08 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photo
Ha!
tv
Juan J. Buhler wrote:
Just a funny old picture I found in my hd. Comments welcome.
http://www.jbuhler.com/tmp/ca99-0533.jpg
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Yeah, but in 30 years, when there are no more pixels, what'll we do?
We're using pixels at an alarming rate! At some point we'll run out.
Kent Gittings wrote:
Yeah but if in 30 years there is no more film you can still use a digital
camera.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pal, in north America they are all about the glitz and
glamour, the latest hi tech. I had a hard time finding
a 50mm lens new or used in Toronto, it's next to
impossible to get a decent prime telephoto either. If
it doesn't have a nikon or canon logo on it they
rarely know about it.
--- Pål
On 21 Nov 2001, at 9:57, Kent Gittings wrote:
Actually unless they have changed the rules the seller in an auction without a
reserve is allowed to bid once to mach sure he doesn't have to sell it at some
ridiculously low price. And that uses some kind of generic account and he can
only do
William Robb wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm, doesn't a conventional camera depreciate as well?
Yup. But at some point, the depreciation stops but the camera
is still useful. Witness the number of 30 plus year-old PENTAX
horses that get hitched up every
Cool.
Delano Mireles wrote:
Well, I finally went out and shelled out $21 for a Hewes developing reel -
about $10 more than the ones I previously purchased. All I can say is WOW
what a difference! Rolling the film on there the first time was like
buttah. Every neg came out and I am
Rob Brigham wrote:
What I dont understand is how it works with TTL.
TTL extinguishes the flash when the required amount of light has entered
the lens. Thus the duration of the flash cannot be known in advance.
But it's still *way* shorter then the duration of the shutter being
open.
The thing with the Canon is that the individual inks are so much more
expensive, that it works out cheaper to throw away unused ink from a
combined cartridge on an Epson!
I too dont know about the C80...
-Original Message-
From: Kent Gittings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21
One point that you did not make, Shel, is that Digital cameras and printers
are disposable
I'll continue to keep the LX and MX in good repair because essentially they
are mechanical marvels with little in the way of electronics. I'm sure you
feel the same about your Leicas, etc. Digital
I have the Epson C80 - pigment inks for long-lasting prints but you have to the right
paper. Most matte papers work well, Ilford's Classic Pearl works well but will need a
printer profile, Epson's PGPP works well and their Professional Glossy Paper works
even better but has to be cut to size.
I don't know about shipping costs and duty to Canada, but Atlex.com sells the color
inks for $8.xx apiece and the black for $24.xx, about $50 for the 4 total. I
understand that there is a CIS system being developed for it hopefully due out early
2002 and that should save some money.
Maris
Hi Kent.
I use both the S800 and bjc8200 from Canon
and are happy with them.I sent some prints from the
s800 to Tom Monday.We'll see what his view is.
I find the Photo Cyan and Phot Magenta are usually
the first to go with Black the last(bought my 800
in July,run off 200 prints +- and just
I have it and I like it. I have the second generation with 2 aspheric surfaces and non
rotating front - it is very sharp. The 1/2 life-size macro is good to have, too.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperäinen
http://www.photocritique.net/g/s?zzmwdn-p21072919
Hi folks,
This one's a portraiture attempt, but I think I have a lot to learn yet
about getting the lighting just right on these grab shots. As always,
comments/criticisms appreciated.
Bill Peifer
Rochester, NY
-
This message is from the
Maybe they are a collector. That looked practically new, and it had a box . . .
Ken Archer wrote:
I need a little help here. I have been known to squeeze a nickel till
the Indian rides the buffalo, but for the life of me I can't figure out
why anyone would pay twice as much for a lens hood
- Original Message -
From: Pat White
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: Attention CANADIANS (MZ-s)
I picked up my MZ-S in Edmonton at McBain Camera ($100 less than in Toronto,
and no provincial sales tax in Alberta!), and am happy to report that
HAHAHA, I always wondered why people had such
different skin tones in the prints than in person. I
blamed the lighting, the meter's 18% grey insistance
and fiters. Now I know it's Fuji :-)
**FUJI is the most egregious violator of the way
white and colored skin
should really look.
Mafud wrote:
You still read THAT?
Um-hmm. I wanted to break away, but every time I tried to, they yanked me
back! Herb Keppler still manages to pique my interest with his elections of
gadgets. I also got hooked on his self-admitted unobjective tripod mirror-up
tests, which stunned him
Now this I'd like to hear more about. Can you elaborate on this point,
specifically, how do manufacturers get away with labeling a lens as
Apochromatic when it isn't? Is the term APO used to imply that a lens
is apochromatic, when, in fact, it's just a model name given to the
lens? Which
Doug F. wrote:
A midwestern friend (Omaha) once told me the winters in the midwest are
so bad because there's nothing between you and the Arctic Circle but a
couple of barbed wire fences. :-)
Har! That's a good one.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Hmmm, doesn't a conventional camera depreciate as well?
William Robb
---
Hardly at all if you judge by the prices folks ask for
their used equipment here on the PDML. BSEG
---
Len
---
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Mafud wrote:
I prefer the colour, but that is really a non sequiter, becasue
it is an esthetic judgement rather than a technical one.
Thanks you. I've been waiting for someone to point this out.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Amazingly funny!
And a bit sad...
I wonder what the third blackboard stood for... social science?
Gianfranco
(a degree in Sociology in a drawer somewhere...)
- Original Message -
From: Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:05 AM
On Wednesday, November 21, 2001, at 09:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I speak about medium format digital, I mean (or meant to say) film
to
drum scanned medium format. I was astonished at the size of the files
when I
had my 6x7 negs scanned the first time. They eat up ZIP 250
Then maybe I should still consider the Canon S800 and S630.
I'm considering upgrading my scanner from my current Epson 1200U to a 1650.
Especially since I found my transparency adapter fits both. It would upgrade
my 35mm scans from 3.9 MP to 6.9 MP and my 6x6 scans to 28.5 MP from 16 MP.
Not to
Thanks. I never used that on mine because a reasonable reserve was better
from my experience.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Studdert
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT:
By that time we will be using molecular scan at least. Repeat after me the
print IS the reality.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Maris wrote:
Epson 6-color printers use similar colors except I believe they use a
second yellow shade rather than either the second cyan or
magenta, but i could be wrong.
The Epson 6-color printers use the same colours as the Canon that was
mentioned:
Black cart = black (duh!)
Colour cart
They don't seem that expensive here. They are lots cheaper than the Canon
all-in-one cartridges from the earlier ones. Got to the point I do my own
refills now.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Brigham
Sent: Wednesday,
I have a 2110, a 4400, and a 5000. Mostly because they can use most of the
same ink tanks.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Brooks
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: Photo
Well, your cost of supplies is far cheaper than mine. 25 Sheets 8.5x11 Photo
Glossy paper $20. Set of ink cartridges for Canon BJC-620 $35 (those are my
actual cost, rounded to the dollar). Cartridges last about one pack of paper
for photo quality prints (again my actuall results). 2 up 4x6 = 50
William R. wrote:
Keppler rocks. I wish he would change magazines. It is hard to
justify buying Pop just for him. Hey Mike, you still have any
pull over at DCCT?
Heh! Keppler is one of the, if not the, prime movers of _POP_. And even if
he were just a columnist (which he emphatically
For what it is worth the newest version of this lens
has three APO elements compared to one in the SD
version. That's probably why it is rated highly. I
noticed that it is rated higher than the Nikon 70-300
by PopPhoto and PhotoDo.
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just
Maciej Marchlewski wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Can anyone tell me what 'Second Curtain' sync is when referring to flash
gun technology? I've seen it readily advertised with new units - however
not with mf LX/MX and AF280T mutant.
I think I understand what 2nd curtain flash is and how it
Mafud wrote:
Any professional, in any field, will be known for many attributes, one of
them is consistency. Another is repeatability. Can you (anyone) reproduce
the
same level of excellence consistently?
KODAK is still in consumer film only because FUJI came along. They have
stayed because
Patrick White wrote:
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Watermarks may be useful, but it's not foolproof.
They're supposed to provide some proof of ownership, and perhaps security.
A watermark then seems a general waste of time.
Collin is indeed correct -- there is no way to protect a digital image
Wendy B. wrote:
Alas, I don't like cheese,
Not even Wensleydale?
Oh, of course I *LOVE* Wensleydale!!
LOL!
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Paris, Leonard wrote:
I'd guess this is either the sign-up listings for classes at MIT (no art
classes offered)or jobs available at a job fair. Kinda speaks volumes about
marketable skills. :-)
It's the job fair at SIGGRAPH '99. SIGGRAPH is the ACM group on
computer
I might as well send an e-mail and ask, because If I've infected anybody
it's already happened.
Yesterday my laptop computer started acting pretty weird. When I move the
mouse pointer around the desktop, the icons would start flipping around
slot-machine fashion. Sometimes, not all the time,
Hi Lon,
Thanks for the kind words, I'm glad you appreciated my shot.
I've been working on a project involving broken, abandoned dolls
for almost seven years. Most of the time I take only a shot of a
subject, seldom I have the time to shot a entire roll, but I
always try to follow the spur of the
Ken A. wrote:
I need a little help here. I have been known to squeeze a nickel till
the Indian rides the buffalo, but for the life of me I can't figure out
why anyone would pay twice as much for a lens hood as they did for the
lens.
Ken,
Because someone wanted it enough, I guess. I think I
Brendan wrote:
HAHAHA, I always wondered why people had such
different skin tones in the prints than in person. I
blamed the lighting, the meter's 18% grey insistance
and fiters. Now I know it's Fuji :-)
Interesting thought: I expect that those who want natural skin tones, or
natural color in
Gary M. wrote:
Steve Jobs: But we are better then you
Bill Gates: It doesn't matter.
You don't have to be the best to be the biggest. You just have to know how
to market your product so that
the consumer =thinks= you have the best.
Or else you have to be a rapacious, evil bastard
Mark R. wrote:
I think Bob Walkden holds the record for coming up with things I wish *I'd*
said!
He holds the same record in my book, Mark!
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Yep, that's right. A little film warpage, though it can be as much or maybe
a little more than the thickness of the emulsion(s) doesn't really cause
major decreases in sharpness.
Another point that hasn't been mentioned here (at least I haven't seen it
mentioned) is that depth of focus/field
Colin B. wrote:
We just can't find any good way to identify Canadians.
They look just like us. :)
Talk funny, though, eh?
g
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
I suspect that they only approach perfection, as a goal, but never actually
achieve it. The real world does have to be considered, ya know what I mean?
In other words, when you get close enough, you can claim victory.
To hold them to having to be perfect because they use the term APO is not
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Tuesday, November 20, 2001, at 11:33 PM, Chris Brogden wrote:
3-packs of Superia 800 (also 24exp) go for about $11 CAN, I think.
Where? Sheesh, they cost us $11.25 wholesale.
The store I work at (Don's Photos) sells them for $11.99.
Canon BJC-620 Properties
--Graphics and Color
--Halftoning
--Smooth, patterned, solid.
Of course Canon does not know what they are talking about.
No 3 (nor 4, nor 6) ink printing device is capable of printing shades of
color. The only way to make it look like it does is by
It is art, and it is social commentary though, no doubt, accidental and unintended.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:05 AM
Subject: Is it art?
| Just a funny old picture I found in my hd.
On grab shots you can't always get the 'lighting just right' - excellent grab shot, I
like the kids' expressions. You can fix the aesthetics in Photoshop or whatever image
editing program you are using.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Tom C. wrote:
I know loupes have been discussed at length, so I don't want to start a
large loupe discussion. Right now I'm using a Carson 7x plastic thing.
It's large enough to fit over an entire 35mm slide, but it's only
relatively
distortion free at the center of the FOV. What does it cost
Well John you could check out Postscript printers. Micrograpfx Picture
Publisher will generated halftone separations on them, but I don't know if
they would be much like traditional halftone separations as I don't have a
Postscript printer.
--graywolf
Tom wrote, concerning the lowly white index card:
Aim the head at the ceiling halfway to the subject, but place a
card behind to reflect some fill. I actually use the side of a 100 sheet
box of b+w paper. I hold it on with a rubber band, which lets me slip
it around to the side for when I
Hi,
These are the pictures that were assigned to me this month.
(Mentally I am at least a week behind calendar time, so I am not really
that late this month... :) )
Home of the Ancient Gods by Paul Stenquist
Fascinating colors and scenery, indeed. The framing is well done, the
shooting too.
In a message dated 11/21/01 12:13:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. This would make the simple visible copyright notice in the image one of
the better protections -- although easy to remove, it would make it very
difficult for the thief to claim they didn't know
Te la cambio por una Z1p con un 28/70 2,6 2,8 Tokina y varias pantallas
de enfoque.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
En nombre de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miércoles, 21 de noviembre de 2001 18:00
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: LX and K 50 1.2 for
Mafud jousts::
How then, did FUJI become so well known so
quickly? The same way Japanese products, especially automobiles, took over so
many markets. Not with shoddy products but with government subsidies.
They didn't even have to do that. What Fuji did was to come into a market
that Kodak
Hey Kent,
4x5 scanning backs were 100-150mb ten years ago, that translates to 50MP. I
know for a fact that at least one current 4x5 digital back gives 485mb
files. A 4x5 CCD back based on the same wafer that is used in the Phillips
chip in the prototype MZ-D would give an 80MP (240mb) image. Of
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
