thankyou for your assistance
Hi Marnie:
1, 5, 7 and 9!
Sometimes I berate myself for not having a more positive approach
But then I tell myself it's OK.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:10 PM
Subject: Dumb
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
Bob, can I apply to join your library? :-)
quote
Application requirement No 1.
The putative lender shall leave a significant portion of their
body as deposit against late return.
unquote
8-)))
mike
Of course. Silly typing error. Sorry
Kethyl
- Original Message -
From: Nicolas Colarusso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:58 PM
Subject: RE: Looking for an MX-S..or shouldn't I?
Do you mean and MZ-s?
-Original Message-
Hi Steve,
on 13 Jan 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
trees, fences, etc., were quite easily visible to the eye. The LX
exposures of roughly 30 sec at f/5.6. Rather short, I think, compared
to some of the suggested exposure tables that I've seen, and sure enough,
the negatives are so badly
Thank's!
Typing error, silly me... I'm of course referring to the MZ-S!!! MX-S
would be interesting, though.
And as I tried to state, I'm really going to use my MF lenses on the AF
body. But if the focus confirmation works good, I might not need the AF
adapter. Still, I'm interested in
At 08:38 14.1.2003 +, mike wrote:
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
Bob, can I apply to join your library? :-)
quote
Application requirement No 1.
The putative lender shall leave a significant portion of their
body as deposit against late return.
unquote
8-)))
mike
... Any fully working Pentax body will
Hi!
Sorry for my typing error. I do of course mean that I'm looking for an
MZ-S
By the way, two bodies are listed on eBay, but the seller has no feedback,
and shades. I've send a question for the seller, and is waiting for an
answer to analyze
Kethyl
- Original Message -
Hello all,
I have a question about P-TTL on the MZ-S using the AF360 flash and ...
wait for it ... Bellows.
The MZ-S will not use P-TTL if you put on a pre A lens (for example a
set of bellows). I know that it is possible to fool the camera by
drilling out contacts on the lens mount, but
Dnia 14-01-2003 o godz. 9:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heiko
Hamann) napisal(a):
Hi Steve,
trees, fences, etc., were quite easily visible to the eye.
The LX
exposures of roughly 30 sec at f/5.6. Rather short, I think,
compared
to some of the suggested exposure tables that I've seen, and
sure
Every now and then I get sick of the colour cliché (mine and others'
images as well). Then I switch to BW and suddenly discover the
subject in the colour chaos. Lately I even put a yellow filter on
the lens to help me ignore the offending colour. On this picture,
one wouldn't have made
And as I tried to state, I'm really going to use my MF lenses on the AF
body.
That's exactly what I'm going to do too. First, I was going to wait until I
sell some of my stuff, so that I could finance the MZ-S, but my parents said
they would happily lend me the money (having recently moved out
Just as a point of interest, I watched a National Geographic
special on how they photographed some tomb of someone once important
and the assignment lasted 4 months.
The photographer in that time took some 4,000 photos.(this is from memory)
He was discussing how the 'Vault' door was opened
on 14.01.03 9:04, adfoto at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thankyou for your assistance
CS-105 (0.5 meters), CS-130 (3 meters) and TS 110 (with timer for long
exposures and interval shooting). AFAIK these are the same as used for 645N
II.
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Perfect!
I'm also looking forward to really testing the AF confirmation with my MF
lenses, and possibly also the automatic-when-in-focus-trigger (I don't
remember what iyt's called).
Still I'm interested in more info on the AF adaptor, if it exists. I've
read somewhere that it can be used to
thankyou Sylwek but i was more looking at a remote control i thing i dont
have to hook to the camera
like the remote D or E
is there one for the MZ-S
on 14.01.03 10:56, adfoto at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thankyou Sylwek but i was more looking at a remote control i thing i dont
have to hook to the camera
like the remote D or E
is there one for the MZ-S
Oh sorry, I have misunderstood you. But in this case remote control F (the
same as for
is this a good lens
how is its flare control
distortion and optical quality
how does it compare to 135mm pentaxes
how about other 135mm lens of today?
which is the best pentax 135mm
thanks
Well, Peter, you seem to lump K and M lenses together on your (new
equipment) Other Brands page, anyhow...
And, speaking of your Other Brands page, weren't you supposed to
make this a Pentax page a few months ago? Hmmm?
Fred. I will mail you off list the URL of a new test site. I
1. I hope you neg them for bidding on it
2. I wonder what your closing mail might look like
3. I would wager that you would receive more bids if the title went something
like this:L@@K!! DO NOT BID!! FREE STUFF!!
4. 4 shalt thou not count.
5. 5 is right out.
Kind regards
Peter
You can use P-TTL with pre A lens modified formatrix metering.
See: (French page)
(you can translate these pages with: http://babel.altavista.com/tr)
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/multizone.htm
And other pages: MZ-S, BG-10, AF360FGZ etc ...
Michel
adfoto a écrit:
thankyou for your assistance
And if youhave BG-10
IR remote control models D,E,F
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/
Michel
Hi!
Just a short notice. I have Sigma 28-135/3.8-5.6 zoom lens. Bought it
off BH for $170 about a year ago. Now it sells for even less. This is
quite an average lens. It has only one advantage - versatility. The
rest dissatisfies me. Especially the build quality - zoom creep was
noticeable
K2 'chrome' probably the nicest one I have seen for ages.
Even better than mine? ;) I've had it fixed since I was in your neck of
the woods...
ERC for K2
What's an ERC?
Dave I can't even remember. About the same as yours? Ever Ready Case. Or
frequently Never Ready Case.
Peter
I use it because I like the way it looks.
I can look at a photo on Tri-X and KNOW that it would suck in color. It
filters out a bunch of extra stuff that can make the photograph cluttered
and distract from the subject (mainly people in my experience).
Cory Waters
- Original Message -
Has any one heard of this lens
it is not the soglior 200mm 2.8 rebaged
Color film renders things as they are. BW renders them in a multitude of
grays. There's a certain beauty to be found in looking at the world with
a different kind of vision, a different palette. And there's the
challenge of foreseeing how ordinary color scenes will appear once
they've been
Agreed!
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BW photography is, in many ways, a higher calling.
Paul Stenquist
It is still there they moved it a while back. Look in the selection box
labled Display on the left of the screen.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January
Ken Archer wrote:
[...]
In case you haven't noticed, it's not just the MZ-S price that has been
cut in half lately. All the camera equipment has dropped tremendously
in the past six months. I have a bunch of stuff to sell now, but like
Mark Roberts remarked last night, I am holding off
ok, i'll bite.
as far as looks go, pretty much everything these days ends up in photoshop,
and desaturating is a very simple step there. so from this standpoint it
doesn't matter whether i shoot bw or color.
i shoot bw because i get to develop it myself. because i know it's not going
to fade as
The move from film to digital is causing the prices of lots of film cameras
to decrease, not just the MZ-S. Big name medium format prices are coming
down rapidly, too.
Len
---
Having said that, has anyone else noticed that the price of new MZ-S
cameras appears to be in freefall. They appear
on 13.01.03 20:16, Gregory L. Hansen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a zoom lens that goes to 300mm or so. I can't afford a
good one, but I don't want to scrape the $100 bottom of the barrel. I
want the second from the bottom of the barrel. Some lenses, which seem
about what
The thing is probably a f1.4 0r f/1.3 by today's standards, maybe even
f/1.2. Sounds like a real beastie.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Franklin Stregevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Did you have to return the camera?
Len
---
I actualy bought a PZ-20 or something similar off ebay for my sister and
got
notified a couple of weeks later by the Police that it was stolen.
Regards,
Paul
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus
Hi!
MJ Yeah, moving books is a total pain. A lot of diehard book people solve that
MJ by never moving, but that's not always a viable solution.
In my case it is indeed not an option. Let's just say that prices in
Israel are high and my salary is zilch at the moment...
MJ As you might have
There was an eBay seller that sold equipment he stole from a large camera
store in Canada. I believe he was an employee. Too good to be true prices
on top line cameras and lenses. The Canadian law enforcement folks were
tracking down eBay buyers. I never heard how the case ended. Perhaps
Hi,
The VS1 is a sweet lens. Close focus to three feet. The K mount
version is great regarding flare as it is VMC (Vivitar Multi Coated),
the M42 version is not VMC. Optical and build quality are second
to none. It is probably actually a little faster than 2.3.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach,
In a message dated 1/13/2003 9:10:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, eactivist writes:
I have another dumb newbie q (actually I have tons, but decided it was politic to
spread them out over time.) And I've sort of lost count, but I think this is #4.
[snip]
When/how do your take your shots?
Lukasz Kacperczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thirty years ago I was taught the exact
opposite: Treat every frame as though
it is the only one you've got.
That's the thing I like about medium format - less frames, more thinking.
Still, when I shoot 35 mm, I don't hesitate to shoot a few frames
The MZ-S that i bought for about $350us actualy came as new sealed in the
box and with a receipt from a camera store so that the warranty could be
claimed internationaly,
Aaggghhh!! I just bought one for the
equivalent of $900 and that's about as low as it
Just remember that this isn't your money they are spending. It's their
money to spend however they see fit. Why not just describe the lens as
to size and f stop and the condition in terms of mechanical, optics and
cosmetics. If it is a good or excellent quality lens is up to the
buyer to
Pentax FA 28-105/4.5-5.6 ($120 and I'll pay US shipping)
I originally bought this great lens from KEH in Bargain Condition for
$200. Bargain pretty much describes the body cosmetics only as
optically the glass is clean.
After I owned it for a month or so, I noticed a piece of fuzz
I think you answered your own dilemma about wording in this email:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
SNIPmost of the pictures taken with it look okay, not that
bad, with no obvious distortions, until it is zoomed to its
maximum focal length,
Begin Original Message
Put these words in the description.People will be agast at how
honest you are and just might bid :) :)
Dave(soon to be an ebayer to)Brooks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
SNIPmost of the pictures taken with
The other is the Vivitar S1 70-210/2.8-4.0. Unfortunately, it's
not the constant 3.5 version, which I beleive is one of the best
- ever.
Several sources, including the now-defunct Third party Lens
Resource web page, rated the f2.8-4.0 version as the best of the
Vivitar 70-210 Series 1
Oh, most of the pictures taken with it look okay, not that bad,
with no obvious distortions, until it is zoomed to its maximum
focal length, then it has swirlies. Not terrible swirlies as some
pdmler pointed out awhile back, but swirlies.
Swirlies? g That's a new term to me - how do you
Henry wrote:
Are we expecting a ground breaking price for the
coming D-SLR too?
I am, at least, expecting a groundbreaking camera. Everything known to me indicate a
true generation shift in Pentax SLR's with the new DSLR. It may be very different from
the current Pentax SLR in most
I think just about all of these zooms become soft to varying degrees at
300 mm. Unless you need 300, the 80-200 f4.7-5.6 is a surprisingly sharp
little lens.
I've gotten good results from, and can recommend, the Sigma 70-300 APO
Macro f4-5.6. Be sure to get the APO version, as there is a less
Bill D. Casselberry said:
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
... And I've had it up to here [insert proper gesture] with
estimating distances and calculating apertures because
I'm pushing it past the thyristor specs.
Years ago I made up a plain gridsheet in ExCel and entered
the
I like BW, it's cheap, process and print your self (
Still a newbie at this but no one seems to know ).
It's more fun than colour at times not to mention the
old fashioned positive comments people give you
when you show them the prints.
Last time I heard that term (swirlies) it was used to describe a prank that
kids pulled on other kids in the washroom.
Stick the kids head into the toilet and flush..
ergo
swirly (swirlies is plural)
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14
Hi Marnie...
Remember that the qualities of a lens are generally subjective. I may find
the images from lens X to be perfectly acceptable, but someone else using it
for a paying job may decide otherwise. One person's ceiling is another's
floor, so to speak.
Avoid describing the lens's image
I think that Macs elicit a fierce loyalty in a certain subset of users,
i.e., some folks passionately love Macs. I think that the majority of
users could care less and see Windows and Macs as essentially
equivalent, but use Windows since its more common and profits from the
higher amount of money
Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 13.01.03 20:16, Gregory L. Hansen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a zoom lens that goes to 300mm or so. I can't afford a
good one, but I don't want to scrape the $100 bottom of the barrel. I
want the second from the bottom of the barrel. Some lenses,
Hi!
I am not talking to myself, really I don't :).
I've been thinking recently (how unusual) and found a way to modify
somewhat the sharpening procedure I posted.
You can obtain quite unusual results by the following:
1. Instead of mild High Pass Filter apply it really strongly, say with
I'd been wanting an AF280T for a long time and finally got one today.
It's HUGE!
People are going to think I'm a pro or something :)
Certainly, it's bigger than the Optio Altoids camera.
Downloading the manual (free, not from Ebay) now...
Cory Waters
Besides the aesthetic benefits already mentioned, I've taken up BW for more
artistic projects because I can do all the processing at home in a matter of
hours as opposed to over a week at a lab. I could also make my own color
prints, and probably will someday, but color does add another layer of
I think just about all of these zooms become soft to varying
degrees at 300 mm. Unless you need 300, the 80-200 f4.7-5.6 is a
surprisingly sharp little lens.
Not all 100-300's are soft at the long end. I do not have any
experience with the autofocus Tokina AT-X 100-300/4 at all, but the
All that counts is whether it is a bad/broken/malfuncting lens, or it
performs like every other Cimko 70-200. If it is not working as designed
then make mention of that fact. If it has typical performance, for that
lens, it's a case of, you get what you pay for and would not say
anything more.
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
... And I've had it up to here [insert proper gesture] with
estimating distances and calculating apertures because
I'm pushing it past the thyristor specs.
[ snip bunch 'o stuff ]
H - seems you have all info you need at your disposal
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 03:07 PM, Foto Syb wrote:
Hello!
Would you mind sharing some experience?
I consider buying a Pentax 100-300 FA lens, the new silver one,
f4.7-5.8. But since there has been lots of critics on the 4.5-5.6
lens, I thought I should ask your opinion on the
I think this is the first 3M pixel camera from the major manufacturers to
break the US$300 barrier. Are we expecting a ground breaking price for the
coming D-SLR too?
Excellent. Another 'what's your guess thread'. I'm in.
Body only, basic kit, 1299 USD, 1199 GBP.
Cotty
Having seen the pro-level reflector that Cotty (you know how hard it is to
type the name CoTty when your name is CoRy?) built for his AF280T and having
just acquired one of the mammoth flashes myself, I'm looking for the
scissors and materials.
What is a good reflecting material? Is it a white
What a great lookin' new k-mount site! A tip o' the hat to Boz Dimitrov!
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
I'm still confused about 6x7 prices on ebay. Maybe
prices are falling? Was this a good deal:?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=29977item=1950471936rd=1
I was all set to bid forgot to watch the clock.
Doh. I'm getting very frustrated! Oh well...
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, CBWaters wrote:
What is a good reflecting material? Is it a white one that I want? What
plastic bottles work well?anything else I'm looking for before I go dumping
out all the liquids under the sink?
I haven't seen his, but don't many people use a gallon milk jug
I say under $1000 usd, they're going after the DZlr's
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this
is the first 3M pixel camera from the
major manufacturers to
break the US$300 barrier. Are we expecting a
ground breaking price for the
coming D-SLR too?
Excellent. Another 'what's
So what happened to that cult classics web page anyway?
I noticed it was gone over the weekend.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several sources, including the now-defunct Third party Lens Resource web
page, rated the f2.8-4.0 version as the best of the Vivitar 70-210 Series 1
Hi Mark,
on 14 Jan 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
What a great lookin' new k-mount site! A tip o' the hat to Boz Dimitrov!
Wow! I second that. Great, Boz! The design is nice, looks modern and the
navigation on the left side is much more comfortable than the old style.
Regards, Heiko
In a message dated 1/14/2003 11:02:52 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Put these words in the description.People will be agast at how
honest you are and just might bid :) :)
Dave(soon to be an ebayer to)Brooks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 08:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A mouse is simply too bulky. So I've never been able to digitally
draw/paint very well -- very frustrating.
Nothing beats holding a pencil for drawing, or a pencil-sized object.
Nothing.
Doe aka Marnie This has been a
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 01:14 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
As teenagers my friends and I endured epic late-night Leinie's runs
that
could last four hours and land us in god-forsaken little rural hamlets
in
central Wisconsin in the middle of the wee hours.
Having lived in the rural
Sure those swirlies are not just poor bokeh??
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:38:24 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Moral Dilemma re Selling on Ebay
In a message dated 1/14/2003 11:02:52 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL
What a great lookin' new k-mount site!
Gee, that's surprising, Mark - usually Boz announces his K-mount
changes on the PDML, and this (unannounced, I think) seems to be
the biggest change I can remember !!!
A tip o' the hat to Boz Dimitrov!
Yes, indeed. I've only started looking around on
There is also a link with a photo that shows swirlies for those
who were wondering what they are.
So, are swirlies referring to the sort of concentric circular
bokeh effects, then?
Fred
In a message dated 1/14/2003 1:49:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The other drawback of a tablet is the feel. Instead of the tactile
feedback you get with a pen, pencil, paintbrush or crayon, with a
stylus you have only the feel of a tiny point of plastic sliding on
Woo hoo! I'm #1 at $0.31! Eat my dust, misers!
:)
chris
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ken Archer wrote:
As I understand it, it's a penny ante and a quarter limit. Can I get in
this game? ;-)
On Monday 13 January 2003 05:24 pm, David Brooks wrote:
How soon before a NON pdmler bidsVBG
Dave
I'd leave this bit out.
No.
- Original Message -
From: Leonard Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:31 AM
Subject: Re: OT: ebay once again: would you do that?
Did you have to return the camera?
Len
---
I actualy bought a PZ-20 or something similar off ebay for
WARNING!!! DO NOT, NOT ALL AT ONCE, write to me telling me that
an item is less rare than I write. [snip] In other words, if I
say that A is seen once a year and B once a month, I mean that
it's about 1:10, and the once a year or once a month is just
mildly indicative.
WHAT ???!!! HUH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd leave this bit out.
It also takes okay pictures, not too bad, with no obvious distortions
until the zoom is extended to its maximum focal length, then it produces
swirlies. But the swirlies are not terrible, so it's adequate for the
student
Mark D. wrote:
Cause sometimes, color gets in the way.
Good answer!
You don't need colour to define
shape, form amd texture.
John
8000 dpi scan of a 4x5 , I'd love to see a digital
beat that any time soon.
--- Bob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry
group, I'm a new lurker, but what has this
email have to do with the
subject. I get the Digest and find myself misled by
the subjects, making it
harder for me to read
Yes, it's not only the cheese that comes in chunks.
And as a native of the land behind the cheddar curtain,
there's nothing like a drive through Coon Valley! :)
Just take your camera during Oct. atop the bluffs
along the Miss. R., bring some curds to nibble on,
and enjoy photography @ its
I am beginning to think that having any ethical sense at all and selling
flawed and/or not-so-hot stuff on ebay may be too much of a moral dilemma to
resolve.
No, just be honest about it and say what you think.
I had a similar problem with a tube amp that was a real lemon. I couldn't in
Just remember that this isn't your money they are spending. It's their
money to spend however they see fit. Why not just describe the lens as
to size and f stop and the condition in terms of mechanical, optics and
cosmetics. If it is a good or excellent quality lens is up to the
buyer to
It was quite interesting point 'why do you use bw' and also the perspective
various people put. When I started my photography around 20 years back in
India, bw was substantially cheaper and possible to be done in the
home-darkroom at night.
Then came color, and more importantly, 'ease of color
Woo hoo! I'm #1 at $0.31! Eat my dust, misers!
Jeez, if this Chris guy doesn't stop throwing his wallet around, I might
just have to go digging in the sofa cushions.
g
--Mike
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you post a link or two for such free software. Whenever I google
for color calibration stuff all I find is service bureaus and (usually
expensive) commercial calibration packages.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
try these to start with.
It moved to http://medfmt.8k.com/third/
So what happened to that cult classics web page anyway?
I noticed it was gone over the weekend.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several sources, including the now-defunct Third party Lens Resource web
page, rated the f2.8-4.0 version as
Having lived in the rural hamlets of Tripoli and Prentice, I didn't
find them all that god-forsaken. g But, yes, Wisconsin is the land of
cow farts, beer, and cheese.
I don't know if Wisconsin stills leads the nation in love handles run
amok, but it was the nation's leader for quite
I can help. She's using my term for this effect seen in the leaves in
the background:
http://www.shinozuka-family.com/200110autumnlux2/kittyleaves4.jpg and
http://www.shinozuka-family.com/200110autumnlux2/tedkitleaves2.jpg (Rob
Studdert supplied the links).
If there is an accepted term
I'm still confused about 6x7 prices on ebay. Maybe
prices are falling? Was this a good deal:?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItemcategory=29977item=1950471936rd=1
I was all set to bid forgot to watch the clock.
Doh. I'm getting very frustrated! Oh well...
The camera's
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have one for sale at $5 + about $1.50 ship (I paid fifteen with
shipping).
I bought it for Wiziwyg and found out I needed the one made by
Wiziwyg (a lot more expensive).
Andre
these have to come with the calibration data. does yours or do
Hi,
When/how do your take your shots? Answer or not. If you have time, I tried to
figure out
how to simplify this question. The following is just what I could think of based on
reading
the list, not necessarily the best choices.
I usually take a camera with me most places when I'm not at
Interesting re tones vs colors. Been thinking more about that. I bet that is
the often the basis for a preference for BW or color. (Well, in the answers
to Cotty's q about BW, other reasons are also given).
Marnie,
Yes, I think everybody has given valid reasons. The problem with color is
that
I find that I'll take many shots of the same subject, but not at the same
time. There are a couple of things that I've obsessed upon over the years,
and continually take photos of. An old wrecked Jaguar sedan (saloon to you
Brits g), maybe a Mark IV, sits in tall grass next to a house in my
Hi, Marnie,
There is so much hyperbole in some eBay descriptions, I think sticking with the
mechanical facts, and not talking about performance at all is perfectly acceptable.
I've seen so many auctions for lenses that are likely dogs, where the vendor says,
Don't be dissuaded by the fact that
Excellent, Boz!
I must say, I sometimes had trouble navigating the old site. This front
page is clear, concise, looks good, and makes it real easy to go to where
you want to.
Congrats on a job well done!
cheers,
frank
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Hi all, hi Fred,
Gee, that's surprising, Mark
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
