Here'e a link to the plugin:
http://epaperpress.com/ptplugins/index.html
and another site with info:
http://home.no.net/dmaurer/~dersch/Index.htm
Dave S
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:40:11 -0800, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I give. I keep hearing about the PTLens plugin for PS. And
1a): 3 and 4 (become occational, and specific)
1b): Yes it did - but scaled down (less film use than expected)
2): Yes, I ended up buying a AF wideangle zoom.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL
On 12/3/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
For those DSLR users with 35mm gear who thought before buying their DSLR
that
their 35mm film usage would:
Cease all together?
That one.
Did your subsequent actual film use match your prior expectations?
Not quite. I thought I
David Savage wrote:
Here'e a link to the plugin:
http://epaperpress.com/ptplugins/index.html
and another site with info:
http://home.no.net/dmaurer/~dersch/Index.htm
Perfect,
Thanks... I'm enjoying it already!
Dave
Like Paul said: The Pentax-F 1.7 AF Adapter works extreemly well with the
*ist D.
It is worth the trouble, believe me.
At long distances you can't focus that accurate or fast yourself.
I use it for panoramas like this one.
Look at this at full size: http://gallery13117.fotopic.net/p9403525.html
In a message dated 3/11/2005 6:32:53 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Woo Hoo! Now that's getting even. ;-)
I kinda like the one about exercising on the beach though.
Never thought of that.
Don
(Suck in, Relax. Suck in, Relax.
Whew, This is a lotta work!) ;-)
==
Hehehe. I
On 11/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry mates, but you knew this might happen.LOL
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/nik-pent.jpg
Not fair, the Nikon is excited.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hi Don
thanks.
As far a I know a SF7 is a SF1, Pentax names the same camera type in
Europe differently.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 8:07 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: from SF7 to SFxN
In a message dated 3/11/2005 7:23:38 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So you make offensive male jokes. Can you spell H Y P O C R I T E?
[snip]
BTW: thanks for posting the male jokes they were funnier than most.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert
Markus Maurer escribió:
Hi Don
thanks.
As far a I know a SF7 is a SF1, Pentax names the same camera type in
Europe differently.
Not really, the SF-7 was called SF-10 in the US. The SF-X was SF-1 in
the US, and the SFX-N = SF-1N in the US.
Carlos
BTW:
The February 2005 issue of FotoMagazine has a lot of lens tests (hundreds)
published.
Pentax converters are generally the best rated of all, with only one
exception: Nikon TC 14-E (9.8/9.2) (Optics/Mechanics)
Pentax 1.4 x L (9.6/9.6)
Pentax 2 x L (9.6/9.6)
The (discontinued) 1.7x AF is not
Hi,
Saturday, March 12, 2005, 2:24:04 AM, pnstenquist wrote:
Very good! This one is my favorite. Beer me, Marge vbg.
How many men does it take to open a beer?
None. It should be opened by the time she brings it to the couch.
http://www.web-options.com/manoftheyearawards.htm
--
Cheers,
Hi,
[...] I don't wrap
straps, I find thin ones a real PITA. Each to their own.
you're not meant to use them there, Rob. They're supposed to go round
your neck.
--
Cheers,
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graywolf, I was actually hoping to make some uncomfortable. Put the shoe on
the other foot. Make it obvious that some jokes are belittling because they
are
so stereotypical. Sure, they might be funny, but they are based on certain
premises that aren't very funny
The Kodak is not using a CCD, but a CMOS.
I guess the only reason Canon and Kodak can pull it off (full frame CMOS) is
the large customer base and perhaps by controling the sensor (CMOS)
development and production. I know Canon invested heavily in
CMOS-manufacturing - even their entry level DSLR's
Wrong question - sort of.
It's not about designing a new body. This was allways an option - Pentax
designs new bodies all the time. So does everybody else.
It's about utilizing existing technology and manufacturing facilities in
order to access or sustain a market. That's what happened in the
On 12 Mar 2005 at 9:19, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
[...] I don't wrap
straps, I find thin ones a real PITA. Each to their own.
you're not meant to use them there, Rob. They're supposed to go round
your neck.
I guess it's just a case of international semantics, we wear thongs here on our
feet
On 11/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry mates, but you knew this might happen.LOL
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/nik-pent.jpg
Not fair, the Nikon is excited.
Thats cause i told it it may be on TV.:-)
Dave
When i bought the D1 in 2001 i still shot a lot of 35mm film. I only used the
Dslr at the
shows i
was being paid at. After buying the D2H and seeing how much better home and
outsourced
prints were
becoming,i have pretty much left 35mm colour film. My BW is still done by 35mm
and 6x7
film and i
Shiny... :-)
Very nice Paul. I really like the curved lines of the hood, grill guards.
However I find the mirror a distraction. To me a sump is just a sump :-)
Dave S
(Yes, I realise they don't put the mirrors down there to show off the oil sump)
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:45:39 +, [EMAIL
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:23:54 +1000, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK we've now got quite a few DSLR owners on board with a bit of use
behind
them, how about a quick informal usage survey?
For those DSLR users with 35mm gear who thought before buying their DSLR
that
their 35mm film
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Jens Bladt wrote:
When I first read your question, I couldn't say that I had, Kostas.
But I justed tested the Osram against my AF280T and shots without a flash.
You are right!! The Osram shots seem to have a slightly blueish cast!!!
The AF280T shots are - colour wise -
Pentax recommends to use the AC adapter K-AC10 when updating Firmware to
the *istD. Is that really necessary? Would new CR-V3 lithium batteries be
enough? Any other advice what to think about when updating is welcome
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Peter Smekal
Subject: Firmware updating
Pentax recommends to use the AC adapter K-AC10 when updating
Firmware to
the *istD. Is that really necessary? Would new CR-V3 lithium
batteries be
enough? Any other advice what to think about when updating is
welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry mates, but you knew this might happen.LOL
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/nik-pent.jpg
Not fair, the Nikon is excited.
Thats cause i told it it may be on TV.:-)
Next to the
The text-file that comes together with the updating-file says it would take
approximately 90 seconds to complete update. On a Mac that is.
Peter
Pentax recommends to use the AC adapter K-AC10 when updating
Firmware to
the *istD. Is that really necessary? Would new CR-V3 lithium
batteries be
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal5.html
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal6.html
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal7.html
I like the composition, particularly of 6 and 7. I have a small
problem with tonality or exposure or something in
see inline
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:23 PM
Subject: A short DSLR users survey
For those DSLR users with 35mm gear who thought before buying their DSLR
that
their 35mm film usage would:
Peter Smekal wrote:
Pentax recommends to use the AC adapter K-AC10 when updating Firmware to
the *istD. Is that really necessary? Would new CR-V3 lithium batteries be
enough? Any other advice what to think about when updating is welcome
Peter
Hi Peter!
Let me step in where I don't necessarily
Thanks Boris.
On Mar 11, 2005, at 11:36 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, one more from Autorama. I think this is a 39 Ford. There's a
mirror under it to show off the flip side. Shot with the DA 16-45 at
36mm, f4, 1/45th.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3188573
You're welcome. It is the deepest, most pure red automotive paint
available. And it's covered with about six coats of clear and buffed to
an incredible shine. Quite a sight in person.
Paul
On Mar 11, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
Whoa! That may be the reddest thing I've ever seen on my
Sorry the irony was lost on you, folks.
Won't do it again, promise. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We all need to lighten up and be a little more gentle and find
things to make us smile, or ~ God forbid ~ actually laugh at
ourselves!
Too few of us
Hi Shel,
With the browser open, go to the button at the top left that says
view and select custom thumbnail.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2005, at 12:52 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
But I've not found a way to get several large RAW images on the screen
at
the same time. I'll play some more but I don't think
On 12/3/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry mates, but you knew this might happen.LOL
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/nik-pent.jpg
Not fair, the Nikon is excited.
Thats cause i told it it may be on TV.:-)
Next to the penguin, right?
What's that on the telly,
Friday, March 11, 2005, 2:42:40 PM, Jens wrote:
JB I guess the Osram delivers a hotter light, that is higher Kelvin levels,
JB than other/most flashes!!??
JB Hot and cold seem to be the opposite of how we normally think of
JB colours, since a redish colour is often percieved as warmer than
On 12/3/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I think it is major success. In my damaged mind :), it evokes
thoughts of Dune... I mean the planet of House Atreides of course...
Hey Boris, that *is* water in the background. All the Fremen just drowned ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
I like all of these. Love the first one. Very graphic. You have a great
eye.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2005, at 1:38 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
Finally had some time to work on a few more from the NorCal outing:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal5.html
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal6.html
Sounds like fun. Will do.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2005, at 1:51 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:07:41AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I was a little confused by John's assertion below. In the PSCS Raw
Converter one need only go to calibrate, and the red hue and
saturation can be
On 12/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Back in the sixties my buddy Dave was 18 years old. Every Friday night he
would
do what every other teenager in Detroit did. He'd cruise the drive-in
restaurants on Gratiot and Woodward Avenues, testing his tire-smoking 427
Ford
in a
On 11/3/05, Herb Chong, discombobulated, unleashed:
a Canon 1D Mk2 and a set of L lenses is in the budget for May or June unless
Pentax makes a concrete and useful announcement before then.
You'll be buying.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hi,
just to add my few eurocents :-)
I don't believe any auto white balance setting is so good. Even on
caqmeras with superb advanced logic and 30 000 scenes stored in
memory (Nikon D2 series), the AWB gives different and unpredictable
results time to time. If shooting RAW, that's not a big
On 12/3/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Damnit
favorite not favorate
DS
No - 'favourite' ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
HAR!
On Mar 12, 2005, at 4:16 AM, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Saturday, March 12, 2005, 2:24:04 AM, pnstenquist wrote:
Very good! This one is my favorite. Beer me, Marge vbg.
How many men does it take to open a beer?
None. It should be opened by the time she brings it to the couch.
Thursday, March 10, 2005, 9:52:03 PM, pnstenquist wrote:
pcn Just as a practical matter, I know I'm fairly good at
pcn recognizing pure white as opposed to ivory or another shade that
pcn comes close. However, I find it hard to distinguish between a
pcn slightly bluish gray and a pure gray or a
Thanks Cotty. I must have been in a typing mood last night :-). And
that was without alcohol :-))
On Mar 12, 2005, at 8:42 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 12/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Back in the sixties my buddy Dave was 18 years old. Every Friday
night he
would
do what every
On 11/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
May all time favorite man joke:
What does a man think is a six course meal?
==
a six-pack
Followed by some I just got off a web page:
Hey Marn, just to prove I can laugh at myeslf, here's some for you:
BENEFITS OF BEING A
I figured my 35mm film use would be cut in half, and that would be the more
specific types of film - BW primarily. I already had a 3.3. diigcam and
figured that a good deal of the transition was already complete.
Reality - I shoot maybe 1-5% of the 35mm film I used to shoot. That's
almost
Terrific photo, Paul. I had a hunch you'd have some great shots from the
Autorama. I wish now I'd gone myself.
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 8:46 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3188583size=lg
Great story, Paul, and nice picture. Thanks a lot for sharing.
I'd like to hear that 9 liter engine...
Ciao,
Gianfranco
_
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports -
In a message dated 3/12/2005 5:55:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey Marn, just to prove I can laugh at myeslf, here's some for you:
BENEFITS OF BEING A WOMAN
==
Since all those (except for the wonderbra one) are true, I can't see that
they are particularly
OK, you and Godfrey have provided some additional options. Not exactly
what I had in mind, but better than what I had before. Thanks guys!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
In Photoshop you can use the File
In a message dated 3/11/2005 10:20:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's how:
- In the File Browser, Edit Menu go to Preferences.
- Set the Custom Thumbnail size to whatever will fit on your screen
comfortably ... I have a 20 Cinema format display, I set it to 768
In a message dated 3/11/2005 10:52:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm talking about the colour you get from a default conversion,
before playing around with any levels, etc.
Don't forget I don't have CS, only Elements 3.0, so I don't get
to play with the calibration tab
My sources deep within the industry tell me that Photoshop CS2 will be
released on or about April 6th and that the program will contain a new
perspective correction feature. Russell Brown demonstrated this feature at
the Photoshop World Conference in Las Vegas this week. Brown also
hinted, so my
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You shouldn't have to mess with your operating system at all. In
Internet Explorer go to View, Toolbar and Customize and add the FONT
Size button. Then you can select how large fonts appear in web pages you
visit.
Not that you were directly addressing
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Pentax meets Canon
Uh, guys? I'm not generally first in line to complain about
offensive
stereotyping, but this thread's starting to veer dangerously close
...
Lighten up a bit.
I just read this statement: Raw formats ... allow you to retrieve images
before any in-camera processing has been performed.
OK, that seems to be the general consensus, but isn't the original image
captured in BW and then converted to color, and then moved along for
further processing? If
Quoting Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK we've now got quite a few DSLR owners on board with a bit of use behind
them, how about a quick informal usage survey?
For those DSLR users with 35mm gear who thought before buying their DSLR
that
their 35mm film usage would:
Remain
Quoting D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
much snippage
Oh, and I analyze stuff way too much.
(stunned look), Glenn, I never noticed that about you!
ERNR
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=15240item=7500261601rd=1
I posted this because it's a different version of the lens that I've seen
before.
All of the other Takumar (Bayonet) units I've seen were from the K era.
But this one is newer. And different.
No A setting. But it has
On 12/3/05, Mark Roberts,
discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry mates, but you knew this might happen.LOL
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/nik-pent.jpg
Not fair, the Nikon is excited.
Thats cause i told it it may be on TV.:-)
Next
Collin R Brendemuehl a écrit :
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=15240item=7500261601rd=1
I posted this because it's a different version of the lens that I've
seen before.
All of the other Takumar (Bayonet) units I've seen were from the K era.
But this one is newer. And
Rob Studdert wrote:
OK we've now got quite a few DSLR owners on board with a bit of use behind
them, how about a quick informal usage survey?
For those DSLR users with 35mm gear who thought before buying their DSLR that
their 35mm film usage would:
Remain the same?
Be halved?
Thanks Bill. I wish this weather would break. Tired of all the snow.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2005, at 9:02 AM, william sawyer wrote:
Terrific photo, Paul. I had a hunch you'd have some great shots from
the
Autorama. I wish now I'd gone myself.
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks Gianfranco. I've heard it. It has a 13:1 compression ratio, so
it's really an explosive sound. The exhaust headers lead into straight
2.5 inch pipes. No mufflers.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more technically minded here can probably answer your question better,
but AFIAK, the RAW format captures the data as it comes off the sensor.
That's not a straight BW shot, since the individual pixels are each behind
either a red, green, or blue filter. What you have is the light level
Thanks for the advice Keith,
it seems to be a good idea to use an AC-adapter then, and not just a sales
argument from Pentax.
Peter
Peter Smekal wrote:
Pentax recommends to use the AC adapter K-AC10 when updating Firmware to
the *istD. Is that really necessary? Would new CR-V3 lithium
On Mar 12, 2005, at 6:55 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I just read this statement: Raw formats ... allow you to retrieve
images
before any in-camera processing has been performed.
OK, that seems to be the general consensus, but isn't the original
image
captured in BW and then converted to color,
On Mar 12, 2005, at 7:27 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
The only in camera setting that affects the RAW capture is the
sensitivity (ISO) setting, which is an actual change in the voltage
level of the sensor.
Minor correction: when setting ISO, some cameras change the voltage
level (gain of the sensor)
In a message dated 3/11/05 11:42:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remain the same?
Be halved?
Become occasional?
Become specific (i.e. BW only or high ISO or slide only)?
Cease all together?
I purchased the ist D around Christmas with the expectation that my film
usage would
Ok, I have finally figured out how to get it.
They fixed the Athlon issue! So it now works for me.
I have tried most of the trial versions of the other converters, and
also used some at colleague's computer. So I will try to compare to
other 3rd party offers. It's very long, skip to conclusion
GD add them to the sensor data. Optional processing that can be done on
GD the RAW format file is compression (stripping unused bits, packing and
GD lossless compression operations to reduce the file size), but otherwise
Well written Godfrey!
I would just add that what processing is done on RAW
John wrote:
Dude, he's telling the truth. And anyway, a 35mm-sized sensor on a dSLR
requires a much larger lens mount to work as well as on film of the same
size; it's just a matter of physics. This is why Pentax, Nikon, Olympus,
and KonicaMinolta are going with smaller sensors. If you
Herb wrote:
until and unless Pentax produces such a camera, as soon as someone tops out
the capabilities of the current Pentax bodies when they need the capability,
they'll switch. if they are just getting into SLRs but are thinking of the
future, having a very low capability ceiling
No it's not, it's just happy to see you.
Cotty wrote:
On 11/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry mates, but you knew this might happen.LOL
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/nik-pent.jpg
Not fair, the Nikon is excited.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Hi,
it seems a new, highly updated version of DCRAW converter is out -
any of the good programmers here tried it yet? If the colours are b
etter as they claim?
Good light!
fra
On Mar 12, 2005, at 8:07 AM, Frantisek wrote:
GD add them to the sensor data. Optional processing that can be done
on
GD the RAW format file is compression (stripping unused bits, packing
and
GD lossless compression operations to reduce the file size), but
otherwise
Well written Godfrey!
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/11/2005 2:10:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would love to expound on this but I've already had a detailed, long
critique of Marnie's stuff time out on me so I'm not going to risk it again. Suffice
it to say that, while I'm
Paul you need to come to Oz. It was 36 C today.
g
Dave S
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:18:07 -0500, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Bill. I wish this weather would break. Tired of all the snow.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2005, at 9:02 AM, william sawyer wrote:
Terrific photo, Paul. I had
I've just recently updated my Pentax photo browser software (added remote
ass't and adobe Raw Plug in). When I did that the Icon on my G4, Panther dock
changed to an ugly bit mapped thing that I don't like. My icon for photo lab
changed as well but it is quite nice. Has anyone else experienced
I spent most of January and February in OZ and NZ a few years ago. It
was a business trip, but I loved the down under. If it wasn't for my
kids, I wouldn't mind making it permanent, although I would probably
choose the south island of NZ if they'd let me in.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2005, at 10:48 AM,
Here's what I'm after:
I want to take a folder full of RAW files, preview them,
select the ones I want, convert them to TIF as a batch
and save them to another folder.
What 1 or 2 programs will allow this workflow at an
affordable price, with good quality results?
As most of you know digital
it's less in where it counts, how i hold it. but that's not the point. it's
a different mount from anything below it, and that's the point. i can go
from a Digital Rebel to the 1Ds Mk2 without changing lens mounts.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I guess I am a little unique in this survey. I was shooting only 67
film prior to getting the DSLR. I got the DSLR knowing that I would
only be able to afford it or my 67 kit (2 67ii bodies and a bunch of
lenses). I ended keeping the D and selling the 67 kit to pay for the
D and a new set of
I've just recently updated my Pentax photo browser software (added remote
ass't and adobe Raw Plug in). When I did that the Icon on my G4, Panther dock
changed to an ugly bit mapped thing that I don't like. My icon for photo lab
changed as well but it is quite nice. Has anyone else experienced
I want to take a folder full of RAW files, preview them,
select the ones I want, convert them to TIF as a batch
and save them to another folder.
What 1 or 2 programs will allow this workflow at an
affordable price, with good quality results?
As most of you know digital processing and RAW
files are
Hi,
Anyone know where I can get a Liyama (or is it Iiyama?) line output
transformer? They don't seem to be available in the UK 8-(
mike
Cotty wrote:
On 11/3/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
My email system has been dysfunctional for the last fortnight, hence my
delay in responding.
Sadly I'm meant to be abroad that weekend, but it might not happen, and if
it doesn't I'll certainly join you. Just don't take my
Thanks for the advice but the icon on the hard drive also changed to the same
ugly one. I'd like to have a Pentax camera icon there similar to the one that
appears when the remote assistant is used. Any way to get that one??? Sorry
I'm new with this system 10. I'm sure there is a simple way to
On 12/3/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Shout if you need some dosh for deposits, although I'm sure they'll
brush right out.
;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Did your subsequent actual film use match your prior expectations?
I haven't shot film since September 2003. I may again if I get back to
the Sahel. I won't chance the D there. One or both 1p bodies would go
with me.
For users who had Pentax SLRs prior to purchasing a Pentax DSLR did you
end
Thanks Godfrey, I'm checking stock at Barnes and Noble
right now.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey Digiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 11:29 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Best all around RAW converter/manager(s)??
I want to take a
I have the same book. Highly recommended. It truly enabled me in the
use of the RAW converter. I think the full name is Camera Raw with
Adobe Photoshop CS. It's part of the Real World series. As Godfrey
said, the author is Bruce Fraser. His explanation of how the various
adjustments interact
Rob Studdert wrote on 3/11/2005, 11:23 PM:
For those DSLR users with 35mm gear who thought before buying their
DSLR that
their 35mm film usage would:
Remain the same?
Be halved?
Become occasional?
Become specific (i.e. BW only or high ISO or
On 12/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks for the advice but the icon on the hard drive also changed to the
same
ugly one. I'd like to have a Pentax camera icon there similar to the one
that
appears when the remote assistant is used. Any way to get that one??? Sorry
I'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 3/11/2005, 3:30 PM:
Got home around 6 tonight and a package was waiting
for me on the table. Sigma
300 f4
inside
It's a great lens. You'll have fun.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Cassino wrote:
I'd go on some more, but granny is making soap and needs my help.
Tell her not to use the water out of the ce-ment pond. The chlorine
plays Hell with your skin.
mike
Barnes and Noble is holding it for me.
I'll pick it up this afternoon.
Thanks!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 11:57 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Best all around RAW converter/manager(s)??
I
Graywolf wrote:
That got a nice chuckle. You are so right, Glen, delivery is everything.
#27
ROTFL
(I've not heard that one before)
Thanks Cotty. As soon as you started to describe the process I remebered
doing a similar thing in system 8 etc. Nice to know that procedures have not
changed that much since the dark ages of OS 8...
Thanks again.
Vic
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
