Your point is well taken...
I'll revisit their web site, and find an address for correspondence.
Good idea,
keith
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> Keith,
>
> You should at least write to them with the request. If they don't get
> enough requests, they won't consider it. If it appears to be a good
> ma
> Interesting, I will keep your post and bear in mind what you have said.
>
> But I have never approached books as an investment other than an investment in
> enjoyment and/or knowledge.
>
> Of the eight books I have, all are "how-to" except for Galen Rowell's "Inner
> Game of Outdoor Photography
I'm sure it's been done. (But the results were embarrassing to management
so the
report was suppressed).
At 12:34 AM 1/12/2003 -0600, you wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 07:37 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
He don't have to go to all those meetings the pointy haired guys insist
upon?
Cia
Oh God Ann don't use MS-Word, the only thing the HTML it produces is good for
is posting you resume on a web page.
At 12:07 AM 1/12/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Shaun Canning wrote:
> What HTML editors or web page creation software are PDMLer's using for
> their web sites? I am still using Frontpage 2
> Sometimes it's hard to tell, with Mike...
> I suppose he'll take THAT personally, too... Sighhh.
I wasn't criticizing anybody! I was just responding as best I could. I think
the point is valid...that often we want to think about things rather than
try them out.
This is something I have to r
> However, once
> I have the book the market price doesn't matter because I only buy
> books that I like - predominantly reportage, documentary and
> photojournalism - and I keep them. I'm not a trader.
Bob,
Me, too. I will sometimes de-accession books I don't want, but not to make a
profit.
>
> Well, I always felt that 35mm makes really nice 5x7 prints.
Tom,
Actually, I like to see a little grain in my prints. Gives 'em a little
bite. I tend to print at 6x9, 7x10.5 (mostly), or (occasionally) 8x12.
I don't know why, but I get a little bugged by the smoothness of 6x6 at
8x10. It always
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 07:37 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
He don't have to go to all those meetings the pointy haired guys insist
upon?
Ciao,
Graywolf
Well, I guess that must be the answer. Has anyone ever derived a
productivity to meeting ratio?
Dan Scott
How does one turn on the flash?
Marcel Appenzzell
From: John Mustarde
The Vivitar has a red Test button near the bottom. Turn on the flash,
listen for the sound of it charging up, then wait til
the Ready light comes on. When the Ready light is on,
fire the Test button. If the
flash fires, it
> I think I'm perfectly capable of solving such issues.
> Just thought it might be fun to discuss. I thought
> that's what this list was for. Oh well...
>
> I'll try not to "bother" everyone so much in the
> future.
Steve,
I certainly don't mind discussing it. If I sounded condescending, I
ap
George,
I'm changing the thread title since this is about Photoshop again, not Macs.
> Photoshop on a decently sized Intel machine
> under windows XP is virtually indistinguishable from that same program on a
> Mac.
True enough. Photoshop is virtually the same.
> To recommend Photoshop to a ph
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 16:26:32 -0800, you wrote:
>Hello, and good weekend to you.
>
>I have received a Vivitar 2500 Zoom flash that I would like to include as a
>gift to my niece along with an ME Super or an MX body.
>
>The flash has fresh batteries, and when attached to the hot shoe, will not
>fi
If you use a Macintosh there's a program call PhotoSiteTimeSaviour
available from . It's freeware and it works very
well. I use it to generate all the proof pages at my website
. Go there and click on proofs and click on a
recent game to see how it works. Feel free to ask any questions you
lik
Battery strong?, battery compartment clean?, 3 screws on the bottom tight?
Super Program's shutter is 100% electronic. Without juice, things won't
work. Sometimes weak batteries lead to strange problems.
You can have enough juice for the LCD, but not to fire the shutter.
Regards,
Bob S.
[EMAI
Sure is.
1. open source is by definition not ripped off.
2. if you bought the rights to it it is not ripped off.
3. If you cloned (reverse engineered) it with a different look and feel it
is not ripped off.
However, most of the heroes of the early personal computer era were avowed
hackers in the or
Yes, I know.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Mac Blat
> In a message dated 1/11/2003 11:19:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECT
In a message dated 1/11/2003 11:19:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> I noticed a
> long time ago that what someone accuses others of is what
> you can expect
> them to do if they get the chance.
>
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
> http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
Hehehe.
Doe a
In a message dated 1/11/2003 7:05:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Now, as far as Photoshop is concerned, I also have an opinion on
> that. (Time to stir the pot.) To recommend Photoshop to a photographer
> getting into image processing is a disservice. That novice
>
Try Microfrontier's Color It!,
http://www.microfrontier.com/products/colorit40/index.html
At 6:53 PM -08001/11/03, Keith Whaley wrote:
>
>I'd much rather use something else...
>
>keith whaley
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
tom wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>
> > Having worked out of the Baltimore area for a while, I was aware of
> > scrapple. Yet, I have never tried it. Maybe it is time to
> > correct that.
> >
> > I may have to take a business tri
Shaun Canning wrote:
> What HTML editors or web page creation software are PDMLer's using for
> their web sites? I am still using Frontpage 2000, which does the job,
> but is an idiosyncratic little bugger...
>
I just write straight code and crib a lot from previously written stuff -
occasionally
are they interchangeable
i have the grid one for the pz-1p and would love it on the mz-s
Then there's probably something wrong with the flash. Low voltage
units should work fine on an older body if there's nothing wrong
with the body.
At 07:12 PM 1/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
I tried it on six bodies.
Marcel Appenzzell
From: Peter Alling
Does any flash work on the body you tried
In a message dated 1/11/2003 5:21:58 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Sorry for the long post. As you can tell, this is a subject near and dear to
> my heart. Anyway, I highly recommend starting a photo book collection TODAY.
> Even eight books are a good start, so long as th
Hi all,
SF1 body - dead in the water despite fresh
batteries - LCD screen lights up but it won't
load film, shoot, meter etc. It does seem to
switch between it's programmed modes when asked
to. This unit came as part of a package of
stuff that I got (I was primarily interested in
the macro
Keith,
I'm not even gonna answer and you know very well why!
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: slightly OT
>
>
> Feroze Kistan wrote:
> >
> > I tear an old photograph into a stri
Hi Cesar,
All color negative film is overrated. Try 1/2 to 1 stop exposure over the
published rating. probably you will find something like a speed index of 100
to work well with standard processing. Hows that for a film I have never
used? Actually I would try it at 160, 120, 100, & 80 and see wit
Thank you so much Ken!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
"Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film."
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: 135/2.5 hood depth
>
Never head it called anything but a flag here in the states. Must be another
of those inexplicable Limmy things.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003
It's 58mm screw in diameter it opens up to a diameter of about 71.5 mm
and about 55.5 mm long.
At 03:42 PM 1/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Hi, can someone who has this dedicated metal hood for their 135/2.5 let
me know the depth (length) overall. Width would be nice too.
Thanks,
Steve Larson
Redondo
Peter Alling wote:
> I'd think that it's just a bit expensive to trash if you
bought it
> new.
That depends very much on what you usually pay for lenses.
The point I was trying to make (obviously I failed!) was
that
this is (comparatively) a very cheap T&S lens and therefore
one that is well wo
Oh what fun. See comments inline. My opinion is Bruce is correct.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not quite, because Bill Gates is the ultimate rip-off artist. And M$ is
re-known for getting away with it.
>
> IIRC t
Steve Pearson wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I think I'm perfectly capable of solving such issues.
> Just thought it might be fun to discuss. I thought
> that's what this list was for. Oh well...
I'm sorry Steve. My comment was not aimed at you.
I just think that these questions would generate many fa
I think such a thing doesn't exist, but I may as well ask.
I've seen auto zoom flashes that go from around 28mm to 85mm, sometimes to
105mm. And there's a Fresnel lens, the Better Beamer, to extend flash
range, but should be used with 300mm lenses or longer or the corners will
get dark. But that
It still looked like a flag of truce from a distance.
At 08:18 PM 1/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
No, it had 3 (I think) gold lilies, flur d' lis (sp?) on it.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PRO
Cotty wrote:
>
> Been using a Sigma 14mm and lens flare is prominent
shooting anywhere
> near the sun. Sometimes not even anywhere near. Flagging
is my solution
Would a better solution be to buy the Tamron 14mm, which has
superior multi-coating? I believe that Tamron also make the
14mm Nikkor,
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 06:22 PM, Steve Pearson wrote:
Thanks,
I think I'm perfectly capable of solving such issues.
Just thought it might be fun to discuss. I thought
that's what this list was for. Oh well...
I'll try not to "bother" everyone so much in the
future.
Happy New Yea
He don't have to go to all those meetings the pointy haired guys insist
upon?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> If one guy can do all this and keep it up todate on a daily basis,
> what the H*ll is wrong
Does any flash work on the body you tried it on. I have a MX which has
dirty flash contacts
down deep in the body. It only works sporadically with any flash.
At 04:26 PM 1/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Hello, and good weekend to you.
I have received a Vivitar 2500 Zoom flash that I would like to i
I'd think that it's just a bit expensive to trash if you bought it
new.
At 12:29 AM 1/12/2003 +, you wrote:
A K wrote:
> A shift AND TILT lens, like Canon's 24, 45 & 90!
Have you thought of trying the Soviet 35mm f/2.8 T&S lens?
It's almost cheap enough to trash if it doesn't satisfy.
Jo
Not really a rip off. The founder of DR was something of an Idealist and
wasn't against the use of his structures to create a code compatible version
of CPM86. Microsoft did however reverse engineer some of CPM86 to fix a few
bugs in DOS.
At 07:30 AM 1/12/2003 +1100, you wrote:
- Original
Not quite correct, the guy who actually wrote Q-dos got nothing but his
salary in the deal.
The company that he worked for got the fee. There is some justice, he did
eventually get a
cushy job at Microsoft, while his boss's went out of business.
At 03:10 PM 1/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
In a mess
Why Mike, you didn't ask my opinion, so how can it be best?
BTW, the reason Apple could not keep Gates from using the interface is
because they didn't invent it, Xerox did.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
It would be really hard to get Gates (Microsoft) to pay Apple royalties since
the MAC interface is a simplified version of the LISA interface (also Apple),
which was a complete copy of Xerox's experimental interface from their Palo
Alto
Research Center. Neither organization would want to open tha
Cesar;
It's a nice film. Like most 160 speed it is best rated at 100. The only
problem with it is finding someone who has a channel balanced well for it. I
have seen too much of it run slightly pinkish due to not having a separate
channel balanced for it.
BUTCH
"Each man had only one genuine voc
I think Mike was making a general comment, not criticising you.
I have noticed and commented before, that threads very quickly become
generalized, and replies should not be taken personally. But we all do that,
me more often then many. As you read the list you will notice that we tend
to be a rath
> Slightly OT, but I was surprised to come across a list of books you
> recommended on a sidebar on Amazon.com, but was never able to find it
> again. Is there any to track those lists down?
Dan,
Here's what that list was compiled for:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/smp/09082002.html
The link is
> Sorry for the long post. As you can tell, this is a subject near and dear
to
> my heart. Anyway, I highly recommend starting a photo book collection
TODAY.
> Even eight books are a good start, so long as they're good ones!
>
> --Mike
>
I think I know what the next Sunday Morning Photographer wil
And right you are to apologize, Cotty. I was looking at Macs in Comp USA
down in Charlotte today. Obviously they are pop sculpture, not working
tools. Any worthwhile computer has to be in an ugly black (or at least
beige) box. Good lord, those apple people don't even know what a computer is
suppose
Hi,
Saturday, January 11, 2003, 10:21:58 PM, you wrote:
>> I've only got eight photography books so far, but I haven't been at this long
>> -- just give me time. Hehehe.
> Actually, I know a fair amount about books. I was in charge of the Rare Book
> Room at one of the colleges I attended and wo
Well, I always felt that 35mm makes really nice 5x7 prints.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Isn't that sort of the problem with 6x7? You really need to make big
> enlargements to really appreciate it.
Hello, and good weekend to you.
I have received a Vivitar 2500 Zoom flash that I would like to include as a
gift to my niece along with an ME Super or an MX body.
The flash has fresh batteries, and when attached to the hot shoe, will not
fire. When it was checked last year it worked - or maybe
A K wrote:
> A shift AND TILT lens, like Canon's 24, 45 & 90!
Have you thought of trying the Soviet 35mm f/2.8 T&S lens?
It's almost cheap enough to trash if it doesn't satisfy.
John
The original french flag was solid white not tri-colored.
At 10:46 PM 1/11/2003 +, you wrote:
Thanks Frank.
>Great idea.
>
>But, why are they called French flags? They apprear to only have one
>colour, not three.
>
>Anyone know?
You know, I was just thinking that when I read your post. Ast
Thanks,
I think I'm perfectly capable of solving such issues.
Just thought it might be fun to discuss. I thought
that's what this list was for. Oh well...
I'll try not to "bother" everyone so much in the
future.
Happy New Year!
--- John Whicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Johnston w
Thank you, George...
It needed to be said, and you did it.
keith whaley
George Sinos wrote:
>
> Mike -
>
> It's not that I don't respect your opinion, because I do. It's just, in
> this case, times have changed. Photoshop on a decently sized Intel machine
> under windows XP is virtually indis
Mike Johnston wrote:
> One thing I've noticed over the years in dealing with
photo hobbyists is
> that we like to "think" the solutions to problems. Often
we'd be better off
> discovering the solution through _doing_ rather than
thinking.
How true! What is perhaps even worse than "thinking" the
47mm deep x 70mm wide
On Saturday 11 January 2003 11:42 pm, Steve Larson wrote:
> Hi, can someone who has this dedicated metal hood for their 135/2.5
> let me know the depth (length) overall. Width would be nice too.
--
Ken Archer Canine Photography
San Antonio, Texas
"Business Is Going To The D
Hi Steve,
O.D. is 2.875", and height is 2.125", as it sits on the table.
That's the Tak version, with 58mm filter thread...
This hood also fits the 200mm 4.0.
keith whaley
West Mar Vista, California
Steve Larson wrote:
>
> Hi, can someone who has this dedicated metal hood for their 135/2.5 let
--- Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it also do this when you fire it on X sync?
Yes
Mark
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Cotty wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I hereby duly apologise. I should know better but I was stupid enough to
> hit the send button before my brain engaged and prevented me. Please
> accept my humblest sorrow for initiating what must rank as a verbotten
> thread.
>
> For the record, I read:
>
> > how
Mike -
It's not that I don't respect your opinion, because I do. It's just, in
this case, times have changed. Photoshop on a decently sized Intel machine
under windows XP is virtually indistinguishable from that same program on a
Mac. Many of the latest Photoshop books point this out in the
Kathy L wrote:
>
> North Royalton. It's a southwest suburb of Cleveland, about 25 - 30 miles
> from Mentor.
Okay, I know where it is...
If Mentor didn't have winters like they do, I may never have moved...
Well, more to the point, if their unemployment rate didn't jump up and
down as much as
I tear an old photograph into a strip wide enough to fit the spool, lick the
end which makes
it slightly sticky, stick it into the spool and pull the leader out. Worked
everytime I tried it.
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Thanks guys
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: Can digital capture do TIME exposures?
> ...or approaching On Topic:
>
> >From "A guide for the use of CCD's: #1 Where to start", fou
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 04:39 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
What some digicam manufacturers have done is to provide a thermally
conductive
path from the image sensor to the chassis (alloy) in an effort to
reduce
thermal noise. The Olympus E series digicams are configured in this
manner.
> Nicholas Basbanes tells a story in one of his books of two brothers--I
seem
> to remember they were from Brooklyn--who literally died when a mountain of
> books in their apartment shifted and crushed them. I can't remember the
> whole story, but I for one can believe it.
>
> --Mike
Its was abo
Okay Folks,
My Super Program developed a problem today. When I
make an exposure, the shutter fires but the mirror
won't drop back down. If I move the aperture ring, it
will brop back down. If I remove the lens, it will
drop back down. If I make dry fire without a lens
attached, the mirror drops ba
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 04:46 PM, Cotty wrote:
Thanks Frank.
Great idea.
But, why are they called French flags? They apprear to only have one
colour, not three.
Anyone know?
You know, I was just thinking that when I read your post. Astonishing
timing.
I don't know - let's hav
Folks,
I hereby duly apologise. I should know better but I was stupid enough to
hit the send button before my brain engaged and prevented me. Please
accept my humblest sorrow for initiating what must rank as a verbotten
thread.
For the record, I read:
> how hard it is to use a Mac
and for th
>That Apple ripped off from Xerox PARC.
Entirely true! Thanks Bruce.
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
_
I have Fuji for NPC $5 per propack (5 rolls, 120)
41 propacks, to be specific.
Collin
> I've only got eight photography books so far, but I haven't been at this long
> -- just give me time. Hehehe.
Marnie,
Actually, I know a fair amount about books. I was in charge of the Rare Book
Room at one of the colleges I attended and would have gone to work for the
Library of Congress if it
Do the scans look sharper than from the HP? I assume the Minolta is much
better than the HP for slides. Have you tried manually adjusting the
focus? Was the Minolta softer than the Nikon (which model?) with the
Minolta dust removal turned off? Do you find the much difference is the
noise when u
Hi Lasse,
I have the scan speed.
I bought it about a year ago from a shop nearby, upgrading to Nikon (same
story as you!).
I was told (and I believe) it was not used for more than 50 films. So in
fact it was brand new and I got full garantee.
I use it with the original software. This software is n
Hi gang,
Been using a Sigma 14mm and lens flare is prominent shooting anywhere
near the sun. Sometimes not even anywhere near. Flagging is my solution,
and here are the details:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/frenchflag.html
Thood for fought.
Cotty
Oh
As far as I know the Dimage Scan Dual III can only handle APS full roll. And
with an optional feeder.
-
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan K. Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Scan
For S-20 owners, no more scrathes from the drive mechanism, better color
rendition of water blues. And easier to load :)
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Rubenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: ScanDual III (was "Re: Ma
Sure, first lets qualify the environment... XP Pro, Pentium 4 @ 2 GHertz 80
GB HD for images. Acanner on a USB 2.0 channel.
I have used the HP s-20 original, an early Nikon scanner.
I find the software package to be quite stable and can scan into PS or into
a file. The software does take a little
Hi,
Saturday, January 11, 2003, 7:35:00 PM, you wrote:
>> Are you complaining, or bragging?
> Greywolf,
> I can't decide. I think both, in just about equal measure.
> It's true I take great pride in my photo book library. It's a constant
> source of education and enjoyment. I wish I had the wh
I think anyone with an auto-loading camera should carry a leader puller. My
MZ-5n mis-loaded on several occasions, and sometimes the leader goes right
back into the cassette. To be honest, it might have been due to not paying
close attention when loading, but everyone makes a mistake sooner or la
On 11 Jan 2003 at 13:34, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Rob Studdert wrote:
> >
> > On 11 Jan 2003 at 13:29, Mike Johnston wrote:
> >
> > > Macs are superior products. They work better, they are more elegant, they
> > > are more pleasant to work with, they're designed better.
> >
> > Mike, you should ge
There are also owners of other scanners that need replacing (HP S20),
and are interested.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you care to share your impression on the ScanDual III? There are
quite a few owners of the SD II on the list and I'm sure most if not
all would be interested.
Dan Scott wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:04 PM, Bob Zwarick wrote:
I scan at the moment using a Dimage Scan Dual III for 35mm and an
Epson 2450
for the 6x6 slides. -
Bob
Hi Bob,
Would you care to share your impression on the ScanDual III? There are
quite a few owners of t
In a message dated 1/11/2003 4:07:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Well Access is certainly no rip off of Paradox... Paradox
> is simply the
> dumbest relational DB I have ever had to use.
> It well might be the rip off of something else.
>
> -
> Bob
Paradox was pretty
On 11 Jan 2003 at 13:05, Dan Scott wrote:
> But you wouldn't have to cool your digicam to liquid nitrogen or liquid
> helium extremes to see an improvement would you? Wouldn't CO2 be
> sufficient for non-astrophotograpy uses?
Hi Dan,
Unfortunately not even tiny Peltier devices (thermo-electric
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:04 PM, Bob Zwarick wrote:
I scan at the moment using a Dimage Scan Dual III for 35mm and an
Epson 2450
for the 6x6 slides. -
Bob
Hi Bob,
Would you care to share your impression on the ScanDual III? There are
quite a few owners of the SD II on the li
Keith Whaley wrote:
"Ryan K. Brooks" wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/11/2003 2:47:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not quite, because Bill Gates is the ultimate rip-off artist. And M$ is re-known for getting away with it.
IIRC the guy that "inven
Why an ISBN number? A simple search at Amazon.com will do it for you.
Unless you just want to check it out at the library. Books like that aren't
really helpful unless you keep a copy close at hand.
Len
---
From: Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It is in fact, just as bad, just as rehashed and just as irrelevant to
photography (no matter how they are used).
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
I fear that this could be just as bad as the gun thread.
On my Tokina 90/2.5 macro, I use the Pentax SMC Takumar 85-210 threaded
metal hood with a 55-to-58mm stepup ring.
Fred, those macro shots you posted are so sharp, I had to put bandaids on my
fingers!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My theory is that books have constantly variable width until shelf
> space is allocated to them. At that point their width becomes fixed at
> "n x 1.3". I discovered this after spending a great deal of time
> designing and building some permanent bookcases in my study.
>
> Subsequent investigati
"Ryan K. Brooks" wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In a message dated 1/11/2003 2:47:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> > Not quite, because Bill Gates is the ultimate rip-off artist. And M$ is re-known
>for getting away with it.
> >
> > IIRC the guy that "i
In a message dated 1/11/2003 3:27:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> It still doesn't change the fact that the founders of Apple saw, what
> was to become the Mac's interface, first at Xerox PARC.
> Bill Gates has
> nothing to do with it.
>
> BR
Not disputing that.
Dis
It's a matter of money, of course. Do you develop stuff for minority
platforms? Or do you develop stuff for the majority platform?
Do you want to sell millions of copies, or just thousands? It's just
business. There are plenty of small companies to fill the little niches.
The big ones hav
> Are you complaining, or bragging?
Greywolf,
I can't decide. I think both, in just about equal measure.
It's true I take great pride in my photo book library. It's a constant
source of education and enjoyment. I wish I had the wherewithal to increase
its size more rapidly.
--Mike
Dan Sco
But you wouldn't have to cool your digicam to liquid nitrogen or liquid
helium extremes to see an improvement would you? Wouldn't CO2 be
sufficient for non-astrophotograpy uses?
Dan Scott (just guessing)
I think someone else posted this too, but basically we use a electronic
cooler t
On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 02:37 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
Rats. It's 2:30 in the morning. I just got a new bookcase, wrestled it
into
place, and have spent the last several hours loading photography books
into
it. And--of course--they don't all fit. I was hoping I'd have space
left
ov
>> how hard it is to use a Mac
>
> This is a classic oxymoron!
Cotty,
Considering that "Windows" is a blatant rip-off of the Mac interface that
Gate's lawyers somehow weaseled him out of paying for, the ease of use of
_all_ computers is directly related to the ease of use of Macs. Even though
Wi
And the URL is: ?
Maris
P Temmerman wrote:
> Pentax Europe has launched their new website with all up-dated info
> and models, including the Optio S and the Espio 24EW.
>
>
> Pat Temmerman
> [MZ3_fella]
> ___
> GO.com Mail
> Get Your Free, Priv
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
