Adorama seems to have slipped in the quality of their service and customer
satisfaction over the last year or so. I no longer purchase from them.
http://www.resellerratings.com/seller1759.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz
... After ordering it, I got an email saying that it was
I geuss Canon makes both full frame and APS sized sensors/cameras. Doesn't
this mean (at least) two lines of lenses?
As sensors get better and better it seems to me it's a matter of time, when
there's really no need for medium format anymore. If this is true, Canon
will(again) come out ahead of
It seems like Pentax (and others?) are having trouble supporting all three
(four) formats APS, 35mm and 645 (and 6x7) with digital bodies. Pentax 35mm
is almost aleady gone. 6x7 will probably go away anytime soone. So what we
are left weith is APS and 645. I wonder if perhaps Canon didn't do the
On 20/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
I hear what you're saying, but guess what.
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/2653/mark_of_the_scots_usa.htm
This explains rather more than I had feared.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Jens Bladt wrote:
It seems like Pentax (and others?) are having trouble supporting all three
(four) formats APS, 35mm and 645 (and 6x7) with digital bodies. Pentax
35mm
is almost aleady gone. 6x7 will probably go away anytime soone. So what we
are left weith is APS and 645. I wonder if
On 21/10/05, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
As sensors get better and better it seems to me it's a matter of time, when
there's really no need for medium format anymore.
That time has already passed.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 20/10/05, Jarek Dabrowski, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello,
Just after purchasing DS - I decided to check it by running a small
comparison between all the lenses that I currently have in my drawer :)
I know that especially wide lenses are usually worse on digital body,
thank on film, but
This must be a very interesting topic.
I got seventy-something posts of this kind in this morning only.
All the best!
Raimo K
personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho/
KAF 39000 is 36 mm x 48 mm and 39 megapixels!
All the best!
Raimo K
personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho/
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The sensor size is 33mm x 44mm
The info can be found here:
On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Don Williams wrote:
I have plenty of speed but too little memory I think. The brand new
CS I have won't load.
FYI Adobe recommend 384Mb (320Mb minimum).
I'd recommend starting at 512Mb if your files aren't too large.
My problem is the opposite of yours: I have
On Oct 21, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Your numbers don't make any sense to me - but the math of these
things is
not my strength. A 3600ppi scan from one of my negs, on a 16-bit
dedicated
film scanner, works out to be about 33mb and has dimensions of more
than
5600 x 3600.
On Oct 21, 2005, at 1:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Scrabble is now available in a Welsh version!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4308262.stm
I would love this. None of those accursed X, Q and Z tiles, and I'll
be allowed to spell things however I want!
- Dave
On Oct 21, 2005, at 1:55 AM, Cotty wrote:
BTW, just in case you think I'm joking (about the village), look here:
http://www.traveltradewales.com/fe_faq/faq_details.asp?faqsID=10
Pity you're only allowed seven letters.
- Dave
On Oct 21, 2005, at 10:26 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
I parked one time next to a sign that was obviously saying not to
do something (diagonal slash line across sign), but I never did
find out what it was that I was being instructed not to do.
It said No Parking.
- Dave (you have 30 minutes to
The reign of fear is driven more by the unscrupulous media than by
politicians, in my view. The politicians just bend with the wind. And
the police do the same. Murdoch has a lot to answer for.
John
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:02:59 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
fra: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Gonz
Subject: Re: Today I Was Stopped by the Police While Photographing
Hey, that sounds like Minority Report. Did you ever see it?
The screenwriter went on to write laws for the state of Texas.
No, they
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:17:50 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
I hear what you're saying, but guess what.
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/2653/mark_of_the_scots_usa.htm
This explains rather more than I had feared.
:-)
But the KAF 31600,which is what the original post was about, is smaller -
33m x 44mm and 31.6mpx, as noted in the article for which I posted the URL.
Read the article ... better yet, here's the quote:
With 39 million imaging pixels in a 36 mm x 48 mm imaging
area, the KAF-39000 sets a new
Hi all!
Here is my small FS Friday list. So far i have not offered these for
sale anywhere else. I believe the FA-2 isn´t that easy to find these
days, so i wanted to offer here first:
LX FA-2 Finder - NEW - Never mounted on a camera, comes in an original
box with instructions and a cover.
Don't worry Shel. Everyone is being profiled now:
http://tinyurl.com/qtn
Dave
On 10/20/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Earlier today I was walking from a friend's house to my bank, about a mile
away. It's a straight walk down one main street. It was a perfect day to
practice
Cotty and Dario
So, what you are saying is that it's been to late/not very clever for Pentax
to release a D645? Will it ever emerge, do you think? Or was the D645
mock-up's just a way to say: Dear Pro Pentax users - please stay with us, we
aim to catch up anytime soon! Or did they simply aim to
Sorry if i am double posting this. I am not too experienced in writing
to the list, as you may have noticed... ;)
Hi all!
Here is my small FS Friday list. So far i have not offered these for
sale anywhere else. I believe the FA-2 isn´t that easy to find these
days, so i wanted to offer here
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 03:17 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 20/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
I hear what you're saying, but guess what.
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/2653/mark_of_the_scots_usa.htm
This explains rather more than I had feared.
There were
You think you're harassed in the 'States? You guys aren't even
born yet :-)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,170-1829289,00.html
Chris
there are only a few Canon EF-S lenses, a macro and three wide zooms. if you
believe that full frame is where real DSLRs ought to be, then there is only
need for some wider lenses to keep the APS-C users happy. the rest are going
to continue to be full frame at the conventional focal lengths of
Canon wasn't a player in MF, Pentax was. Plus, the Pentax 645 body will
probably work fine with 6x7 lenses. That's why I'm holding on to mine
at least until I see how pricey the body is. If it starts at 5K or so,
it will be 2K in three years.
Paul
On Oct 21, 2005, at 3:04 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
That stands to reason. The Scots and the English were at each other's
throats over here long before the revolution. The town in Jersey where
I lived for a dozen years, originally Aberdeen, was founded in 1687 by
Scots fleeing their English neighbors in Middletown, New Jersey.
Interestingly
Don't tell that to all the pro shooter using Hasselblad's with digital
backs. Medium format has by no means been abandoned. Expect to see
more. A lot of the car shooters who used to work in 4x5 are now working
in MF digital. Some of course are still working in large format with
digital backs.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I haven't used any DA lenses myself, but several others have reported
that they cover more than the APS-C area, enough for full-frame,
in some
cases. And Canon seems to do fine selling DSLR's that don't work with
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 06:17 AM, Chris Stoddart wrote:
You think you're harassed in the 'States? You guys aren't even born
yet :-)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,170-1829289,00.html
Chris
Good to know that idiocy is not exclusively confined to the USA.
What if she
David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be allowed to spell things however I want.
I'd think that would be more of an advantage to Dave Brooks g
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 21 October 2005 4:14 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Ragdoll
Anthony Farr wrote:
tell the truth works well.
same a lie
Yep, I found that out later after I'd checked out
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shel, look at the Tamrac Velocity series.
Single strap sling type bag.
http://tamrac.com/5747.htm
The Velocity 7 is the bag I use when bicycling or backpacking. I usually
keep it slung around in front rather than on my back (especially when
backpacking
I can recommend LowePro Offtrail 1.
If you have bigger body, then you can try to find Offtrail 2.
Gasha
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'll be wanting to carry my camera and an extra lens or two while riding my
mountain bike - mostly, at least for now, on the paved streets and roads.
Any suggestions
Hi Gang!
For not needing I am selling this 2 lenses. If you need more
iformation, pictures etc, please contact me off list.
1) Pentax Metalic color, mint, FA 77mm f1.8 Limited. Purchased on May
2005. reason for sale, have 2 only need 1. Includes everything (papers,
lens pouch etc) and
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Pentax DSLR future
It seems like Pentax (and others?) are having trouble supporting all three
(four) formats APS, 35mm and 645 (and 6x7) with digital bodies. Pentax
35mm
is almost aleady gone. 6x7 will probably go away anytime
Hi,
I've used those - never much cared for them. Thanks for jumping in, though
;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gasha
I can recommend LowePro Offtrail 1.
If you have bigger body, then you can try to find Offtrail 2.
Gasha
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'll be wanting to carry my
On 10/20/05, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Roman Republic did in fact have a constitution. When they overthrew the
Etruscan kings and established the Republic the laws were kept secret and
not revealed to the plebeians - the ordinary free people. The laws worked
very much in favour of the
There was a series of 3 mockups on design that people could vote for
on a japanese camera show last spring. Anyone still have the link?
Here is the site with the 645D pictures:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2005/03/18/1209.html
And here they are in better quality...
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time for you to read In Patagonia by Bruce Chatwin
Also Nowhere is a Place by Bruce Chatwin, Paul Theroux and Jeff Gnass.
Gnass is the photographer and his work, IMHO, makes the text pale by
comparison. All shot with a Pentax 67 ;-)
An Adaptall 2 mount lens works like an A-lens.
An adaptall (I) mount works like a K ogr M lens.
An Adaptall 2 mount lens works like an A lens -
- if it is an A (or later) lens
- if the Adaptall 2 mount is a Ka mount (and not an Adaptall 2 K mount)
As far as I know, the Adaptall (1) mounts
Today, digital FF is more than enough for at least 99% of the pro market.
For that reason I think of digital MF as a niche.
To me, I don't find FF to be essential, and I'm even less interested in
645D. Despite that, I think that the 645D will show up next year, and it
makes some sense for
Tks for posting the URL Lucas ...
Perhaps 18mpx will be too little too late. With 35mm format pushing 12mpx
and 13mpx now, maybe it would be a good move if Pentax planned to up the
ante a bit.
I like design B
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Lucas Rijnders
Here is the site with the 645D
Let's say it with an example. If I had to choose between say a 15 megapixel
K-mount FF and a 18 megapixel 645 crop body for the same price, I'd choose
the 24x36 in a blink.
Even easier if the price will be in favor of the K-bayonet body.
So I think the 645D to make sense only for the owners
Two votes for the Velocity bag might be worth looking at if I can find
one.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Roberts
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Shel, look at the Tamrac Velocity series.
Single strap sling type bag.
http://tamrac.com/5747.htm
The Velocity 7 is
It will be fine if it's priced low enough to be an MF digital for
serious amateurs and wildlife shooters. Big dollar commercial
photography pros will want more, and they're already getting it. I
won't be surprised if Pentax plans to sell MF at a price point that is
competitive with Canon FF.
Great camera!But it is a Honeywell. . .
On 10/20/05, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.neovenator.com/special/newslr.html John Celio (tee hee hee!)
IIRC, they show us pictures' of the MS-D, but that nevermaterialized.
Pictures of Alternate models or even a mock-up at ashow doesn't mean they have
a working camera or are even close tohaving one.
[Original Message] From: Lucas Rijnders Here is the site with
the 645D pictures:
On 21/10/05, Gasha, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you have bigger body, then you can try to find Offtrail 2.
I'll tell that to my wife. She says I have to slim.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 08:27 AM, William Robb wrote:
Canon, in their entire history, has never ventured into formats larger
than
miniature format.
But they did prototype a very advanced medium format SLR in the late
80s. The body was designed by Luigi Colani, the man who did
Hi Shel,
http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Beltpacks/classic/
I've used the Orion Mini until I was stolen some years
ago (the infamous LX saga). It's great for cycling,
and the gear is well protected.
Regards
Albano
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be wanting to carry my camera
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 08:35 AM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
And here they are in better quality...
http://www.photoscala.com/comment/reply/771
Regards, Lucas
I like the middle one best, the model B.
Bob
On 21/10/05, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty and Dario
So, what you are saying is that it's been to late/not very clever for Pentax
to release a D645? Will it ever emerge, do you think? Or was the D645
mock-up's just a way to say: Dear Pro Pentax users - please stay with us, we
aim
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/SB_0010.jpg
What causes the horizontal stripes on the subject's arm?
Camera: istD
Shel
Tks for posting the URL Lucas ...
You're welcome.
Perhaps 18mpx will be too little too late. With 35mm format pushing 12mpx
and 13mpx now, maybe it would be a good move if Pentax planned to up the
ante a bit.
Who cares about mpx if the image quality is good? I think we can trust
Pentax to
Is it noise perhaps?
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/SB_0010.jpg
What causes the horizontal stripes on the subject's arm?
Camera: istD
Shel
--
Dr E D F Williams
___
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
See feature: The
On 21 Oct 2005 at 6:33, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/SB_0010.jpg
What causes the horizontal stripes on the subject's arm?
Camera: istD
That's banding, it's a sensor/electronics artifact. I can only assume it's an
high ISO shot or alternately the shot has
People who want to print large. Plus having more mpx makes for good
advertising and publicity. Also, several other MF digi systems already
have more, so it looks like Pentax is behind the times. Sometimes you've
gotta sell more than just the steak. You've gotta sell the sizzle ;-))
Shel
On 10/21/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/SB_0010.jpg
What causes the horizontal stripes on the subject's arm?
Camera: istD
poor hygene? vbg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I wouldn't.
I like wide angles, and from what I've seen the Canons wide angles on full
frame is not very good. I don't think the full frame Pentax lenses will do
much better, so they will have to make new, larger and more expensive wide
angles anyway. The vignetting of my 14mm in *istD is
On 21 Oct 2005 at 6:50, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Canon wasn't a player in MF, Pentax was. Plus, the Pentax 645 body will
probably work fine with 6x7 lenses. That's why I'm holding on to mine
at least until I see how pricey the body is. If it starts at 5K or so,
it will be 2K in three years.
On 21 Oct 2005 at 14:30, Cotty wrote:
What I am saying is that when the full frame 1D came out, a lot of MF
film shooters went for that.
And by the time the D645 comes out (if ever) well after the 5D takes hold there
will be fewer still willing to spend 1D money on a Pentax D645 IMHO.
Rob
Hi,
ISO was 200. Shot was underexposed by a couple of stops.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/SB_0010.jpg
What causes the horizontal stripes on the subject's arm?
Camera: istD
That's banding, it's a sensor/electronics
On 21 Oct 2005 at 15:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the 645D system they will need one new wide angle and use the best part of
the old lenses. In addition they will have plenty of room for more and/or
larger
pixels than the FF sensors. So the 645D may always give better image quality
than
I wouldn't.
If it's OK for you, no problem here.
I like wide angles, and from what I've seen the Canons wide angles on
full frame is not very good. I don't think the full frame Pentax lenses
will do much better, so they will have to make new, larger and more
expensive wide angles anyway.
There you have it. Artifacts like these will sometimes appear in the shadow
area of underexposed shots. You can sometimes get lucky with two stops under
and end up with a nice image, but it's always a stretch. Of course, two stops
under with color neg film returns nothing but grainy mush, so I
On 21 Oct 2005 at 6:53, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
ISO was 200. Shot was underexposed by a couple of stops.
Fair enough, are you using tighter hoods on your lenses than you would for 35mm
full frame use?
Why I ask is that I have a yet unproved theory that the sort of banding you saw
may
There are several causes.
Here are three:
#1. The wrong film.
#2. Exhausted developer.
#3. Exhausted fixer.
#4. Low ink levels/dirty heads.
... and most important of all ...
#5. Unrealistic expectations of the medium.
Collin (Frydays come too quickly) Brendemuehl
KC8TKA
I normally use a messenger bag to carry all the stuff i need. In the
summer i use a Camelbak MULE that can also take a camera inside it.
On touring bike i use a handlebar mounted Ortlieb waterproof case. There
also comes a removable map case with that case. The map case is very
durable
On 21 Oct 2005 at 15:59, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Perhaps for selling it, instead of letting most people pick a 16MP Canon or a
12MP Nikon.
You should be in Pentax marketing Dario, though I really don't see why this is
such a problem concept for many people to digest. If Pentax want me to buy a
fra: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Oct 2005 at 15:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the 645D system they will need one new wide angle and use the best part
of
the old lenses. In addition they will have plenty of room for more and/or
larger
pixels than the FF sensors. So the
On 10/10/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One photograph I made with my camera phone that I like a lot ...
It reminds me of some of my Minox work at the Tate Modern.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/40p.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
lovely comp!
Yes you will. But there are a lot of shooters who will want medium format. If
someone, say Pentax for example, can produce medium format at a price that is
competitive with FF digital, it will sell. It's a wide-open market niche that
seems to be a custom fit for Pentax. The resolution and
fra: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like wide angles, and from what I've seen the Canons wide angles on
full frame is not very good. I don't think the full frame Pentax lenses
will do much better, so they will have to make new, larger and more
expensive wide angles anyway. The
On 21 Oct 2005 at 16:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, in that case I would need new lenses anyway because my small format lenses
will not be very good on full frame. I've even discovered some purple fringing
on my 135 1.8 at small apertures (luckily I usually dont stop down much).
Try it wide
On 21 Oct 2005 at 14:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you will. But there are a lot of shooters who will want medium format. If
someone, say Pentax for example, can produce medium format at a price that is
competitive with FF digital, it will sell. It's a wide-open market niche that
seems to
On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:12 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Urgh. I'd say the Pentax way is better. If and when they release an
FF body, you'll probably still be able to use the DA lenses on it
to produce (at least) the 6MP APS-C sized images the lenses were
designed for.
It's a trade off. Canon's
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/10/05, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
You're lucky you didn't meet this woman:
http://media.putfile.com/CrazyLady20
ROTFL!
Silly video, anyone? I'm currently taking a digital video class as part
of my master's degree program at Duquesne.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Content-Type: text/plain
pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 05 : Issue 2637
Today's Topics:
Re: New Pentax Large Format Digital [ Daniel J.
Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Re: Pentax DSLR future
I would be curious if there is a working prototype by now, when they expect
it to be released to the public and MSRP and estimated street price.
I can't go now, unfortunately. There was a death in Nate's family and
we have to head to his folks' place tomorrow.
Remove what?
The lens cap?
Certainly not the PDML. The Pentax list is like the hotel California. You can
check in any time you wish, but you can never leave. Would you like a wakeup
call?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Content-Type: text/plain
I'd love to see your commercial Mark, but I'm getting 6 megabytes worth of code
as a text file rather than a wmv.
Paul
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/10/05, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
You're lucky you didn't meet this woman:
http://media.putfile.com/CrazyLady20
I've been looking for some photo software for a beginner with very basic
needs: Rotate, crop, redeye removal and levels adjustment, etc. I
thought Adobe Photoshop Album would be just the ticket - even simpler
than Photoshop Elements and it has some photo organization capability
(which beginners
iPhoto. Bundled with every Mac for the past few years.
t
On 10/21/05 8:21, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've been looking for some photo software for a beginner with very basic
needs: Rotate, crop, redeye removal and levels adjustment, etc. I
thought Adobe Photoshop Album would be just the ticket -
I Photo, which comes packaged with every Mac, does most of that. No levels
adjustment, but all the rest that you listed. It seems to be a nice solution
for beginners. It has excellent slide show and album creation capability.
Paul
I've been looking for some photo software for a beginner with
i'm sorry to hear that Amita.
my plans for going this afternoon are now down the tubes, but my plans for
tomorrow have been rained out, so i think i will be going. i think Butch
said he was going.
Herb...
I can't go now, unfortunately. There was a death in Nate's family and
we have to head to
And if it didn't, you can buy the iLife DVD at any Apple store, or online.
-Mat
On 10/21/05, Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iPhoto. Bundled with every Mac for the past few years.
iPhoto? It's got pretty much exactly that functionality.
-Adam
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've been looking for some photo software for a beginner with very basic
needs: Rotate, crop, redeye removal and levels adjustment, etc. I
thought Adobe Photoshop Album would be just the ticket - even simpler
On 20/10/05, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
You're lucky you didn't meet this woman:
http://media.putfile.com/CrazyLady20
Or this one...
http://media.putfile.com/omaVSmercedes
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
The shot I posted was made on Bruce's D using, I think, an A50/2.0 lens. I
don't recall what hood I used with it - probably a normal 50mm hood. The
shot was one of the first dozen shots I ever made using a DSLR
With my DS, I always use tighter hoods. For example, for the 50mm I use
the hood
Dario wrote:
Today, digital FF is more than enough for at least 99% of the pro market.
For that reason I think of digital MF as a niche.
But these kind of arguments are absurd! It they made any kind of sense we would
still be driving Ford model T's.
Kodachrome was good enough for 99% of
Paul wrote:
Yes you will. But there are a lot of shooters who will want medium format. If
someone, say Pentax for example, can produce medium format at a price that is
competitive with FF digital, it will sell. It's a wide-open market niche that
seems to be a custom fit for Pentax. The
Dario wrote:
So I think the 645D to make sense only for the owners of a complete 645
outfit. Once again, a strategy for keeping some of the existing customers
from switching, not a strategy for gaining new customers.
I think that the first manufacturer who can make an MF based DSLR that
Jens wrote:
As sensors get better and better it seems to me it's a matter of time, when
there's really no need for medium format anymore. If this is true, Canon
will(again) come out ahead of the competition. I mean, what's the point in
making huge MF sensors if 35mm format is getting better
On 10/20/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
Too bad you don't have a little digi so you could shoot me a pix of the
messenger bag and the otter box. That would give me a better idea of what
you're describing. But thanks ;-))
here's the otter box:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:49:10 +0100, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 03:17 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 20/10/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
I hear what you're saying, but guess what.
On 10/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove what?
The lens cap?
Certainly not the PDML. The Pentax list is like the hotel California. You can
check in any time you wish, but you can never leave. Would you like a wakeup
call?
i wonder: was it something we said?
g
It's a digital moiré pattern and usually an artifact of digital processing
within the camera. How was the photo saved? Raw?, jpg? how much compression,
if any?
Regards,
Bob...
By all means, marry. If you get a good wife,
The pro shooters who show their books on the car advertising circuit are, for
the most part, migrating to MF or LF digital. Only a very few have embraced FF
35mm digital as the ultimate solution.
Paul
Dario wrote:
Today, digital FF is more than enough for at least 99% of the pro market.
Your dates are interesting, Paul. According to what we tended to learn
in American History back in grade school when I was a kid. America was
settled by the Puritans in 1620. All the people who came here before
that didn't count, I guess. Being descended from one of those New
Amsterdamers you
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
