Op Fri, 07 Apr 2006 03:59:18 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 4/7/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/4/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/honda.php
Thanks Shel :-)
When it aired here a few years ago, it was simply
On Apr 7, 2006, at 4:07 AM, graywolf wrote:
Almost all Unix type software can be run on any of those if you can
get the source code and compile it for your system.
That's very simplified :)
Writing portable Unix software is quite an undertaking as there are
many little differences in
On Apr 7, 2006, at 7:27 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
BSD is both a kernel and some userspace tools (with some GNU tools,
mostly the gcc toolchain also necessary), it's much more integrated
than say Linux, which is an amalgam of a bunch of not necessarily
related projects (Almost none of which are
On Apr 7, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Bob W wrote:
Apple seem to want to turn into a company that sells tin, rather
than one
that sells software. The OS is basically Unix, and now there's nothing
different about the tin it runs on. I'd say they're getting out of the
software business.
Apple write a
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Call me crazy but I am someone who would be (and is) interested in
this. I use Corel Draw to make figures with (NMR) data for scientific
publications. I also use it for making drawings that I use in the
class I teach. While there might be
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
My Epson 2200 has never clogged. I've owned it for about four years
and have made at least 200 11 x 17 color prints. The longest it has
sat unused has probably been about one week. However, it's probably
sat three weeks at times without
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:59 PM, David Savage wrote:
Much more interesting memorable than shots of a car driving through
twisty coastal/mountain roads. Or in the case of a 4WD, getting 3 feet
of air under it as it flies over a sand dune.
How about footage of idiotic drivers being chased through
When I say doesn't autofocus. The 1.7x does nothing. My conclusion is
that the 1.7x can only autofocus when the contacts on the body are in
use (like in a A lens) or short circuited (like in a M lens). My
Tmount can't short circuit the contacts. A piece of conductive
aluminium foil does the job,
We were, however, accosted by a few young females in
various stages of undress with certain requests (Take me
photo, willya?) that we managed to resist.
snip
For decades I've been trying to use my various cameras to pick up
lovely young ladies, and you have that opportunity
On 7 Apr 2006 at 8:54, Toine wrote:
When I say doesn't autofocus. The 1.7x does nothing. My conclusion is
that the 1.7x can only autofocus when the contacts on the body are in
use (like in a A lens) or short circuited (like in a M lens). My
Tmount can't short circuit the contacts. A piece of
FWIW I think they've become a software company that uses its
software to sell its hardware. When I bought my computer I
bought it for the OS alone. I couldn't care less what's
inside the shiny box, but I had to buy the shiny box with the
Apple on the side as that's all that would run
Personally, I find using the keyboard in conjunction with a one
button mouse easier and faster for most things.
Here here!
Here too! :-)
Bedo.
We've got it in Oz too! But I think the mean b-s have cut half of it
out.
Must have taken hours to work it all out.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 5:49 AM
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm going the other way on this one. The bee is soft, and it's very
similar to a lot of other shots I've seen. The sea and rocks is a
very nice composition and a fresh vision, well executed. The second
pic is a winner. The first one is
Yep. We get it from when the muffler hits the tyre.
Dave S.
On 4/7/06, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got it in Oz too! But I think the mean b-s have cut half of it
out.
Must have taken hours to work it all out.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
--
All I ask is the chance to
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Love the bumblebee. Beautyful colours, good comp ...
The second one makes me seasick. The horizon is strait, but my
stomach tells
me it leans to the left. Is being seasick a good thing? For me... not.
That photo was taken at an opening to Cook
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/07 Fri AM 12:08:28 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Windows 98 x *ist DS
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:20:13PM +0100, mike wilson wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I ran a Win 98SE machine for a while, and had a USB card
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/07 Fri AM 01:04:52 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: 1.7x AF
We may have been jumping to conclusions. A very intelligent question Mike.
We have a mastermind among us.
No irony.
You _obviously_ don't know me. 8-) Anyway,
Hi,
I'd like to buy a bit lighter lenses and am thinking about the Sigma
70-200/2.8 APO EX DG. I owned the Bigma 50-500/4-6.3 and would like
to ask someone for a comparison, are the images from the lighter lenses
significantly better than those from bigma in the 70-200 range, besides
that it
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Snip
fatslags
(Needs Flash)
8-))
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
If I'm not mistaken, the original poster is located in Brazil, so US prices
for computer gear may not be applicable.
Shel
From: John Francis
Hardly. For the price of a DL I can get an HP Media Center PC with 1GB
PCI3200 memory, 2.8GHz P4, 200GB SATA drive, and a DVD burner. That's
far
On Apr 6, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
There is a current suit over Apple selling music in its on-line
store. When they settled the last suit, part of the deal was that
they would not sell music. Looks like they're selling music to
Apple Corps, and to me as well.
I think
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/honda.php
There are no computer graphics or digital tricks in the film. Everything you
see really happened in real time exactly as you see it. The film took 606
takes. On the first 605 takes, something, usually
Epson Enhanced Matte is probably the best choice for test printing. It's
no good for sale (paper yellows over time) but it's extremely close to
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag, so you can use it for test printing for anything
that would be printed on HPR. Moab Kayenta and Entrada are two of my
favourites
On 7 Apr 2006 at 11:11, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/honda.php
There are no computer graphics or digital tricks in the film. Everything you
see really happened in real time exactly as you see it. The film
Dave Brooks wrote:
What was the matte paper suggested.Just a regular Matte.??
I use Epson Enhanced Matte with the MIS inks and it comes out nice.
Except when some of the nozzles are blocked, which happens quite
regularly, but cleaning the heads before printing usually solves that.
S
It will still be dozens of times faster than processing, scanning, and
printing 6x7 film. A good, automated RAW workflow makes it barely any more
work to get standard JPEGs out of the process than capturing in JPEG format
to begin with, but nets you the ability to go further when scene
You're a master of these flower and light pics, Bruce.
JOhn
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 05:21:34 +0100, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax *istD, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/180 sec @ f/8.0
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
No, the suit I am talking about was just reported on the news last
week. The earlier settlement in which Apple agreed not to sell
music was before on-line music sales were ever envisioned, and
Apple is trying to say that it only applies to the
That's very simplified :)
Writing portable Unix software is quite an undertaking as there are many
little differences in APIs, even though the systems tend to operate in much
the same way. I've even had problems with shell scripts, although GNU
utilities help a lot if they're installed.
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 7 Apr 2006 at 11:11, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/honda.php
There are no computer graphics or digital tricks in the film. Everything you
see really happened in real
I'm using Epson Enhanced Matte with the MIS Eboni ink. Fifty sheets of
8.5x11 is CAD$24.99 at www.epson.ca (free shipping).
I've only printing 25 images so far and clogging has not been an issue
for far. I'm doing BO printing, and to my eyes (and all I've shown them
to) they look very good
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:36 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
It simply sounds like you may have picked the wrong camera for the
job, the hot
pixel management implemented in the Pentax bodies obviously isn't
working in
your shooting scenario.
Works fine in mine. Had mine performed as poorly as Dave
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You asked why/when one should use RAW
Actually, no, I never did. I said that I wasn't shooting RAW, someone
asked me why, and then a bunch of people told me I was wrong in my
decision.
I actually do want to know the answer to my
On Apr 7, 2006, at 6:43 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Well-said. I really don't understand the credibility of the anti-RAW
argument that it adds a tremendous amount of work to the workflow.
Even in my linux-land, I've got an automated script to dump RAW files
from the card, apply auto
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You asked why/when one should use RAW
By the way, the original post was asking for help for a friend taking a
technical writing course who wanted to know what are the most common
things you'd do to a RAW file in conversion.
-Aaron
Cool link.
After reading the comments from Paul and Godfrey I had another look at the
bumblebee.
I have come to that it is the softness of the bumblebee that makes me like
it. That and the simplicity is what make it work for me. Simple, elegant,
and slightly different.
But others are allowed
Cory, did you read my post? I said NOTHING about anti-RAW, I said that FOR
MY USE of the camera it was not the correct choice.
Yes I did... my comment was more rhetorical to the large number of
comments with that sentiment. Yours just happened to be the latest... :)
I don't think anyone
On 4/7/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Rob Studdert wrote:
Precarious balance and counter weights?
Thanks. Where are they? Inside the tyres?
Kostas
I think so. The way they roll just isn't quit right.
Dave S
--
All I ask is the chance to prove
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:19:32 +0100, Aaron Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 6:43 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Well-said. I really don't understand the credibility of the anti-RAW
argument that it adds a tremendous amount of work to the workflow.
Even in my linux-land,
On 4/7/06, Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Brooks wrote:
Quick service. My Epson R220 arrived Tuesday and my MIS black inks just
showed up.Well the SO just gave me the package, they were here erlier.:-)
Horse show with Jr tomorrow, so i;ll set it up Saturday and try some of
My shameless listing for a lens for sale.
Pentax 300mm f/4 Manual M42 thread. It comes with a K mount adapter and a
Ricoh KR-5 III body that works fine except the light meter is off by about a
stop and the cable release threads are stripped.
I am asking somewhere around 130.00 for the lens with
Big, fuzzy, intrusive, knob is just too much. The blossoms themselves,
however, are shot at a great angle and with nice lighting.
A worthy effort.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax *istD, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/180 sec @ f/8.0
Converted from Raw
Do anyone see this, in any way, as being a computer assisted
sequence?
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/7/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Rob Studdert wrote:
Precarious balance and counter weights?
Thanks. Where are they?
On 4/7/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do anyone see this, in any way, as being a computer assisted
sequence?
Jack
Possibly in the initial design of the setup, but IMO the video is genuine.
Dave S.
--
All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy. -
Spike Milligan
On 4/7/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Where are they? Inside the tyres?
Kostas
A brief explanation about the tyres here.
http://www.steelcitysfinest.com/HondaAccordAd.htm
Dave
--
All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy. -
Spike Milligan
On 7 Apr 2006 at 21:23, David Savage wrote:
On 4/7/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do anyone see this, in any way, as being a computer assisted
sequence?
Jack
Possibly in the initial design of the setup, but IMO the video is genuine.
I did have a video link to the making of
David Savage wrote:
On 4/7/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Where are they? Inside the tyres?
A brief explanation about the tyres here.
http://www.steelcitysfinest.com/HondaAccordAd.htm
Nice night-time panorama of Pittsburgh on that page...
:)
It's probably just Frank in a bear suit...
Norm
From: Cotty
http://www.geekbase.org/squirrelproblem/
And that's just outside PDML Central, at GFM.
On 7/4/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Or do you REALLY never make an error with exposure?
I never do :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Norman Baugher wrote:
From: Cotty
http://www.geekbase.org/squirrelproblem/
And that's just outside PDML Central, at GFM.
It's probably just Frank in a bear suit...
I thought it was Dave Brooks without the flannel shirt.
All commercials are computer assisted to a certain extent. The film is
digitized before it's edited. Even the editing process performs digital
modifications. I don't have specific knowledge of this spot, but Shel tells us
it was shot live. Assuming that's true, I'm sure that some work was done
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
You asked why/when one should use RAW
Actually, no, I never did. I said that I wasn't shooting RAW,
someone asked me why, and then a bunch of people told me I was
wrong in my decision.
I still haven't seen the original post. I saw a
It's $20-22 at most retail outlets.
-Adam
Fred Widall wrote:
I'm using Epson Enhanced Matte with the MIS Eboni ink. Fifty sheets of
8.5x11 is CAD$24.99 at www.epson.ca (free shipping).
I've only printing 25 images so far and clogging has not been an issue
for far. I'm doing BO printing,
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: OT: help from the RAW file shooters
Cory, did you read my post? I said NOTHING about anti-RAW, I said that
FOR MY USE of the camera it was not the correct choice.
Aaron, you are discussing a topic with zealots, every bit as
I don't want to get into a debate about it, but I have the DVD that
includes the advert and the making of film about it. The people who
shot it produced it as an interaction of the objects, not the result
of image manipulation. It was very difficult to produce and quite an
achievement.
Hi Aaron,
First off, I understand your position, and feel that your choice of
shooting JPEG is a good choice for you, in the situation that you're
shooting.
To answer your question:
I don't think it would be very time consuming. Last night I just started
to read the chapter in Bruce Fraser's
I read an article the described how it was done. Weights were placed
strategically placed strategically inside the tires.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 4/7/2006 5:57:32 AM
Subject: Re: OT - Honda UK Ad
On 4/7/06, Kostas
Aah. I see.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7. april 2006 04:33
To:
I didn't say anything of the sort. I said that the person who sent me the
link included some comments, and that I didn't know how accurate his
comments were. There are at least two links to how the video was made that
have been posted here. They make interesting reading.
Shel
[Original
Well, I firmly have one boot in each camp. For serious images I use raw.
For throw away images I use jpeg, not even the highest grade of jpeg.
The trade off is some times simply the matter of how many images I can
get on the card (68 raw or 400+ jpeg with my 5mp C-5050Z). That said one
of the
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: RE: OT: Big Squirrel Problem
Aah. I see.
You should see our bears
William Robb
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke,
http://www.snopes.com/autos/business/hondacog.asp
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All commercials are computer assisted to a certain extent. The film is
digitized before it's edited. Even the editing process performs digital
modifications. I don't have specific knowledge of
Of course it is. However I was not trying to be a guru, I was just
commenting on Shel's idea of one size fits all computing. However I
never have had that much of a problem running something I had the source
code for. Yeh, maybe it needed a tweek or two to run on the equipment I
had. But tell
I still think the little red eraser in the middle of Thinkpad keyboards
is the quickest and easiest pointer device to use in conjuction with the
keyboard, no need to move your hand back and forth between them.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot
As someone who uses Thinkpads daily, the nipple is better than a
trackpad, but significantly inferior to a mouse. The mouse is simply
more accurate and faster.
Both my Thinkpads have USB mice attached.
My Mac has a 4 button mouse. Right-clicking is faster than ctrl-clicking.
-Adam
I never suggested anything of the sort. The concept of one-size-fits-all
computing was first proffered by ~you~.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: graywolf
Of course it is. However I was not trying to be a guru, I was just
commenting on Shel's idea of one size fits all computing.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/honda.php
There are no computer graphics or digital tricks in the film.
Everything you
see really happened in real time exactly as you see it. The film took
606
takes. On the first
On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
The original theme was something like getting the most out of your
DSLR. That's contrary to your suggested mode of operation.
Uh, the original theme was 'can you help my technical writer friend by
telling him what you do most often while
On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:56 AM, John Forbes wrote:
Or do you REALLY never make an error with exposure?
The exposure has not changed inside the domed stadium in recent memory.
Perhaps one day they will change the lights. But in the meantime,
yes, I am pretty sure that I will not make an
On Apr 7, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've not timed the task specifically, but I know I've done case of
200-300 RAW files, set to output to a half-rez JPEG (1000x1500 pixels)
8bit sRGB file, on an iMac G4 20 with 1.25Ghz processor and a fast
disk, and walked out of the room
This is what I do regarding RAW conversion in Capture One (C1) when
there's a batch I want to pay attention to:
1) Create a new folder
2) Inside that folder create a new RAW folder
3) Move files to the folder
4) In C1 set root as destination folder
5) Select portrait style files and rotate 90
Hello Aaron,
Even as a RAW shooter myself, I can fully understand why you would
shoot jpg. In your situation, you can dial in the exposure you want,
along with WB and be on your way. I think some venues can benefit by
shooting jpg.
--
Bruce
Friday, April 7, 2006, 5:19:32 AM, you wrote:
AR
On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
How do the tyres climb up the ramp?
The viewer doesn't actually know what is up. Up doesn't have
to be perpendicular to the floor.
True, but that would make other bits of the interaction very
difficult to
Now I see why the new wide angle zoom is so popular over there. Because
everything is soo big.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
You stupid Aaron, you don't shoot raw.
PS: sorry just kidding ;o)
Hah!
-Aaron
That sort of tweaking manipulation was assumed. The essential
mechanics were really my point of wonderment.
Thanks.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All commercials are computer assisted to a certain extent. The film
is digitized before it's edited. Even the editing process performs
digital
Okay..I get your point and you'll get no debate from here.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to get into a debate about it, but I have the DVD that
includes the advert and the making of film about it. The people who
shot it produced it as an interaction of
Beautifully rendered and perceived. The white seed sails could imply
age.
Like it!
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like to think of this as viewing life from the perspective that I
have now - late parenthood. So I take the viewpoint of the dandelion
seed cluster. Looking
Well done. What I like most is that it can stand on its own without the
explanation. A simple title, Life, would make it all quite clear. Nicely
executed.
But sorry to hear you've gone to seed :-))).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL
In that case, US prices for cameras probably aren't applicable either.
I'd still expect a good PC to be available for less than the price of a DS.
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:16:31AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, the original poster is located in Brazil, so US prices
for
Gabriel Cain wrote:
Most mailing lists have a feature called Receive-own-posts, and it usually
defaults to false -- you know what you wrote. What you're experiencing is
the typical behavior. :-)
Gabriel
Hi Gabriel,
It's true some mailing lists are set up that way, but not this one.
On 4/7/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Epson Enhanced Matte is probably the best choice for test printing. It's
no good for sale (paper yellows over time)
So is that why they changed its name from archival matte?
What matte papers do people use and like in their Epsons?
--
Wendy Beard
Hi!
Big, fuzzy, intrusive, knob is just too much. The blossoms themselves,
however, are shot at a great angle and with nice lighting.
A worthy effort.
Bruce, the light and execution are top notch... However I second Jack's
comment about the knob...
Boris
Hi!
I like to think of this as viewing life from the perspective that I
have now - late parenthood. So I take the viewpoint of the dandelion
seed cluster. Looking back to see the flower (my youth) and the bud
(my childhood) and forward to the remains of the seed pod (late stages
of life). I
Hi Gabriel,
It's true some mailing lists are set up that way, but not this one.
I noticed that right after I posted. :D
Welcome, by the way. Show us your photographs.
Okay, I will. http://gabrielcain.com/
The pictures up there, however, are my Nikon 5400 pix. On the pentax side,
I'm
Simply outstanding Bruce.
With, or without, the explanation.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:10 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Reviewing Life
I like to think of this as viewing life from the
Epson Velvet Fine Art is definitely the nicest of the Epson papers. And Epson's
profiles are near perfect. Radiant White Water Color is my second choice. Not
as much tooth as the aforementioned but considerably less expensive. Some of
the Hannemuhle papers are very nice. Hannemuhle William
FA 28-105 f4-5.6 pz model was a favorite of mine for a film camera. I still
have it. Very good lense, not much heavier than the 35-135 and nearly half
the close focus. Still around, cheap $100-120 at KEH.
Mark Stringer
Hello Gabriel,
Welcome to the list. I took a look through your gallery. You've got
some nice shots in there. One that stood out to me as showing some
creative vision is:
sun-and-the-rocks-at-hole-in-the-wall-01.jpg
--
Bruce
Friday, April 7, 2006, 10:15:16 AM, you wrote:
Hi Gabriel,
Aaron,
This was the question to which I was responding:
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:13:23 -0700
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: help from the RAW file shooters
On Apr 6, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
He's new. He will find the
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:08:42 +0100, Aaron Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:56 AM, John Forbes wrote:
Or do you REALLY never make an error with exposure?
The exposure has not changed inside the domed stadium in recent memory.
Perhaps one day they will change the
On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I've not timed the task specifically, but I know I've done case
of 200-300 RAW files, set to output to a half-rez JPEG (1000x1500
pixels) 8bit sRGB file, on an iMac G4 20 with 1.25Ghz processor
and a fast disk, and walked out of the room
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Gabriel,
Welcome to the list. I took a look through your gallery. You've got
some nice shots in there. One that stood out to me as showing some
creative vision is:
sun-and-the-rocks-at-hole-in-the-wall-01.jpg
Thanks!
On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:52 AM, wendy beard wrote:
On 4/7/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Epson Enhanced Matte is probably the best choice for test
printing. It's
no good for sale (paper yellows over time)
So is that why they changed its name from archival matte?
What matte papers do
On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:38 PM, John Forbes wrote:
The question was: Do you REALLY never make an error with exposure?
If the answer is yes, then go on shootig JPEG. If, on the other hand,
you are human, you might be better off with RAW. :-)
In 22 games last season I did not change the
Why don't you recommend that your friend buy a copy of Real World Camera
Raw and crib his paper from there. It is the book most of the folks on
the list learned from and it is only $25 from amazon.com.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof ==
Ah, but the comment wasn't about which is better used by itself, but
which was better used in in conjunction with the keyboard. I would not
chose the eraser pointer to use with PhotoShop or browsing, but I would
for word processing.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Twas merely my translation of what you said in a paragraph or two. It is
of course possible I read you wrong.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I never suggested
Aaron,
This was the question to which I was responding:
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:13:23 -0700
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: help from the RAW file shooters
On Apr 6, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
He's new. He will find the
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
