On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:53:56PM +1300, David Mann wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008, at 7:50 AM, William Robb wrote:
Try running Windows Update.
You can go to the Symantec website and download a 15 day trial of
Norton
Antivirus which may pick up on the malware.
I've heard that Norton is
On 20/01/08, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm absolutely gobsmacked at the amount of people I see using one of
those things while driving. Put the damn thing away and LEARN TO
IGNORE IT if it rings!
Drivers speaking on the phone by actually using one hand to hold it to
their ear
Sorry can't let this attempt to demonise phone users pass.
Of course it's not a good idea but in the scale of things which cause
the driver to lose concentration it comes well below driving with
Small children
Dogs
Full colour screen sat navs
lighting cigarettes
and last but not least (in your
And you're basing that statement on what exactly?
Any activity that takes your mind off of whats happening on the road
is potentially dangerous.
It only takes a split second loss of concentration for something bad
to happen. Then again you can be concentrating intently shit will
still happen.
On 20/01/08, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry can't let this attempt to demonise phone users pass.
Oh don't get me wrong - I use a phone while driving all the time.
Although, it is hands-free and with a collection of Bluetooth headsets.
It is still very distracting and I've
Small children
Hmmm
Dogs
Cats is worse
don't try driving with dolphins either. Slippery little buggers. Can't
keep the seatbelt on. Always blowing off and flapping their little
arms against the gearstick. Water evreywhere, non-stop squeaking, and
their breath reeks of tuna.
--
Bob
On 20/01/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
It only takes a split second loss of concentration
Jeees i lose concentration for days at a time.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I like the marina pic. Beautiful light. I only wish the boat were
further forward and filling some of the foreground. Lunch for three
is a nice shot, but the shadows are a bit heavy. I'd adjust the black
point a bit and perhaps brighten the midrange a wee bit as well.
Paul
On Jan 19, 2008,
On Jan 20, 2008 10:12 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/01/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
It only takes a split second loss of concentration
Jeees i lose concentration for days at a time.
And look at all the trouble you manage to find yourself in...
Cheers,
Dave
You know Cotty, if a hat event should occur,
we will all want to watch a streaming video of it on Utube.
You being in the business and all... ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 20, 2008 7:09 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/01/08, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry can't let
Sounds like hardware problems, perhaps a bad startup drive.
Paul
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:26 PM, David Mann wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:39 PM, keith_w wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on what Leopard broke?
My entire Macromedia MX 2004 suite stopped working - it thought it
hadn't been
Dave, Jack, Marnie, and Christine,
Thanks for looking.
Dave,
No, I don't carry a fence with me :-)
Mayor Daley has decided that a rought iron fence around
every open space would be a 'beautifying' thing...
Jack,
The owls were not more than 15 feet off the sidewalk and
quite content to sleep
Bob W,
LOL, Great image!
What have you been into this morning?
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 20, 2008 7:24 AM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Small children
Hmmm
Dogs
Cats is worse
don't try driving with dolphins either. Slippery little buggers. Can't
keep the seatbelt on. Always
G'day All,
Taken this evening (~100kb):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2318/2206416056_d018bd8ec2_o.jpg
K10D, FA 77mm f1.8, 15 seconds @ f5.6, ISO 250
Enjoy.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
In November I had an exchange with Sigma Corp. in USA over why the
K-mount version of this lens had never hit the market. I dunno if my
mails catalysed anything, but now they have apparently made a
production run.
So to anyone who desire a really long lens and have $4200 to shell
out, here's the
On Jan 20, 2008 10:24 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Always blowing off
...that problem is not exclusive to dolphins.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Dave,
Nice view out the front door. ;-)
Some crop probably in order...
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 20, 2008 8:26 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Taken this evening (~100kb):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2318/2206416056_d018bd8ec2_o.jpg
K10D, FA 77mm f1.8, 15 seconds @
On 20/01/08, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
if a hat event should occur,
we will all want to watch a streaming video of it on Utube.
Bob,
With the greatest of pleasure.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
Now what can I have for nibbles, I'm getting a bit peckish
--
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/20 Sun PM 02:06:16 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
Bob W,
LOL, Great image!
What have you been into this morning?
Regards, Bob S.
He took his dolphin to church, of
That's good news. However, it says Estimated arrival at BH is 6-10 weeks
at BH now, rather than 4-7 days.
Not that it really affects my decision not to shell out USD 4200.
Carl G
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
AlunFoto
Sent: 20. januar
On 20/01/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
G'day All,
Taken this evening (~100kb):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2318/2206416056_d018bd8ec2_o.jpg
K10D, FA 77mm f1.8, 15 seconds @ f5.6, ISO 250
Enjoy.
You know what, I'd crop the bottom heavily, even lose the lower
firework, just
On Jan 21, 2008 12:02 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/01/08, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
if a hat event should occur,
we will all want to watch a streaming video of it on Utube.
Bob,
With the greatest of pleasure.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
Now
Just wondering..will the downloaded 1.3 firmware give all lenses, with
internal motors, AF capability? Will T/converters have the needed
contacts?
Jack
--- Carl G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's good news. However, it says Estimated arrival at BH is 6-10
weeks
at BH now, rather than 4-7 days.
In a message dated 1/20/2008 7:18:54 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 20/01/08, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
if a hat event should occur,
we will all want to watch a streaming video of it on Utube.
Bob,
With the greatest of pleasure.
In a message dated 1/19/2008 10:08:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you can read this thank Doug Brewer.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
=
Well, I just thanked him recently. Quite sincerely.
But, okay, guess there is no need to be
Ken Waller wrote:
If you can read this thank Doug Brewer.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
Nice gallery, Ken
Always nice to thank Doug for many things but ... but tell us why
you are thanking Doug for your talent :)
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
John Coyle wrote:
I'm with Dave on this - I have Norton on my laptop and it starts so slowly I
can go and make coffee before it's ready.
I suspect it interferes with normal software too, as standard applications
tend to be slow in starting up.
Mind you, the current version of PC-Cillin also
In a message dated 1/20/2008 5:24:05 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Smoking while driving should be outlawed as well as eating - in fact it
all comes under driving without due care and attention.
and last but not least (in your case) eating, especially hats later
LOL !
On Jan 20, 2008 9:02 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/01/08, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
if a hat event should occur,
we will all want to watch a streaming video of it on Utube.
Bob,
With the greatest of pleasure.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
We could make January 19 official Thanks Doug day.
BTW, Thanks Doug.
Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/19/2008 1:08 PM
If you can read this thank Doug Brewer.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
Not bad, but you should crop a bit of the right, flatten out the
contrast a little with curves and rotate it a bit to the left...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Needs salt
Dave
On Jan 20, 2008 10:02 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/01/08, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
if a hat event should occur,
we will all want to watch a streaming video of it on Utube.
Bob,
With the greatest of pleasure.
What Paul and Cotty said
Dave
On Jan 20, 2008 10:58 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice color and exposure. I was thinking the same as Cotty as I looked
at it. But you could keep the lower firework if you clone out the
television antennas and tree top then crop at about the
In a message dated 1/20/2008 7:39:59 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had Norton on the old computer and it took ages also..
I haven't noticed pc-C'l'n doing that on my new one..
It goes through a routine once a day at noon... which I'll be damned if
I can remember
On 20/01/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty wrote:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
Not bad, but you should crop a bit of the right, flatten out the
contrast a little with curves and rotate it a bit to the left...
Ooh these Pentaxians are sore!!
--
Nice color and exposure. I was thinking the same as Cotty as I looked
at it. But you could keep the lower firework if you clone out the
television antennas and tree top then crop at about the roofline.
Paul
On Jan 20, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 20/01/08, David Savage,
On Jan 20, 2008 10:25 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering..will the downloaded 1.3 firmware give all lenses, with
internal motors, AF capability? Will T/converters have the needed
contacts?
Will Boris and Natasha ever catch Moose and Squirrel.:-)
Sorry.
Dave
Jack
---
In a message dated 1/20/2008 8:00:42 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice color and exposure. I was thinking the same as Cotty as I looked
at it. But you could keep the lower firework if you clone out the
television antennas and tree top then crop at about the
why did they even want to catch them?
I can't seem to remember if I ever knew.
CW
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Sigma 500mm f/4.5 now in K-mount
On Jan 20,
I don.t think there is internal motor in Sigma lenses in the K-mount
version. Not yet.
Tim Typo
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: Sigma 500mm f/4.5 now in K-mount
Probably just looks as though it needs something to liven it up
because of the rather flat colours from the CMOS sensor in his
favoured make of camera.
Trouble is that effect will be available for us, if the rumours of the
new sensor are true!!
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Yes, Norton is only good for destoying system installs. As I'm an HP
user these days and they supply Norton, one of the first things I do
is uninstall them. I use AVG anti-virus and Ad-Aware Free along with
the Windows Firewall. Of course, all my systems are behine a real
NATing firewall anyways.
OK, thanks very much, Adam!
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. All two of them. Only the DA* zooms have internal focusing
motors
(Sigma does not offer HSM on Pentax or Sony mount lenses). only the
Tamron PZ-AF converters have any chance of working with SDM AF, the
others will
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: security breach question-- in other words, Help!
I used Norton from 2002 and bought the upgrade until 2006, when i had
to buy 2006. It really slowed my machine down, and its slow to begin
with.
If you had the entire Norton suite
Black Oystercatchers
http://www.islandlight.ca/index.php?image_id=520s=pentaxdiscuss
As always critiques of photo or website are much appreciated.
Cheers,
Francis
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On Jan 20, 2008 11:50 AM, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why did they even want to catch them?
I can't seem to remember if I ever knew.
CW
IIRC they had the formula for upsadaisyum.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I used Norton from 2002 and bought the upgrade until 2006, when i had
to buy 2006. It really slowed my machine down, and its slow to begin
with. I removed it last year, and installed McAffee. Its a bit better
but still pretty slow. I think i may look into AVG. I also have
Webroot installed as well
Yep. All two of them. Only the DA* zooms have internal focusing motors
(Sigma does not offer HSM on Pentax or Sony mount lenses). only the
Tamron PZ-AF converters have any chance of working with SDM AF, the
others will not.
-Adam
On 1/20/08, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just
Thanks, Typo. That answers it for Sigma (if true. I'll be wondering
about T/converters, at some point, with the newer Pentax glass on the
roadmap.
Jack
--- Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don.t think there is internal motor in Sigma lenses in the K-mount
version. Not yet.
Tim Typo
I'm probably snookered here, but the other day I shot some footage of
Erin and her horse, for a sales video. It was with their new Sony HDD
camera, and stupid me set the camera to night mode, thinking that was
back light.(arena very dark)but its for night shooting, i now find out
Now i see the
Thanks , Marnie
I already paid for another year of Pc'llin...
one of those free software things messed me up big time
but I can't remember which it was.
I can't deal with more stuff that requires a learning curve right now -
I keep messing things up as it is.
sorry - I'm jsut really deprssed
It's a lot more difficult for the Police to get phone records here. In
spite of what the hysterics would have you believe. A very serious
crime would have to be involved.
Cotty wrote:
On 20/01/08, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm absolutely gobsmacked at the amount of
I just had the AV running, and it was really slow. Its a bit better
with Mc Affee.
However i rarely use the PC for internet anymore, thats the ibook's job.
Dave
On Jan 20, 2008 12:40 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re:
It might help you to think about bottoms less often...
(Referencing a different thread for those who are confused.)
Cotty wrote:
On 20/01/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
It only takes a split second loss of concentration
Jeees i lose concentration for days at a
So what was the celebration about. (Nice shot by the way, would make
for a nice card).
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Taken this evening (~100kb):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2318/2206416056_d018bd8ec2_o.jpg
K10D, FA 77mm f1.8, 15 seconds @ f5.6, ISO 250
Enjoy.
Dave
--
I
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave, Jack, Marnie, and Christine,
Thanks for looking.
Dave,
No, I don't carry a fence with me :-)
Mayor Daley has decided that a rought iron fence around
every open space would be a 'beautifying' thing...
Mayor Daley also thinks that everyone has a right to vote
The page says 6-10 weeks...
(not that I have need of such a beast, but it sure is perty).
AlunFoto wrote:
In November I had an exchange with Sigma Corp. in USA over why the
K-mount version of this lens had never hit the market. I dunno if my
mails catalysed anything, but now they have
I'd do the opposite, crop about 1/6th off the left side and about 1/5th
off the top keeping both. Either would be nice. But you see plenty of
fireworks shots of just the burst few with recognizable ground features
Cotty wrote:
On 20/01/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
For the blessing of the fishes? (Isn't this kind of dolphin a mammal?
mike wilson wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/20 Sun PM 02:06:16 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
Bob W,
LOL, Great image!
What have
Usually because they had unknowingly stumbled on something valuable,
like the Ruby Yacht of Omar Khayyam, which I believe Bullwinkel was
using as a bath toy in one segment, (and if he wasn't he should have)
cbwaters wrote:
why did they even want to catch them?
I can't seem to remember if
I posted the original as both a test a thanks. Seems I couldn't initiate
posts to the list but I could reply to listed posts. When I advised Doug B.
of this his reply enabled me to fix the issue initiate a submission.
So the initial post accomplished two things.
Thanks Doug B.
Kenneth Waller
No they didn't it was a mineral you mined from a flying mountain, that
somehow no one ever noticed before
David J Brooks wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 11:50 AM, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why did they even want to catch them?
I can't seem to remember if I ever knew.
CW
IIRC
In a message dated 1/20/2008 10:06:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks , Marnie
I already paid for another year of Pc'llin...
one of those free software things messed me up big time
but I can't remember which it was.
I can't deal with more stuff that requires a
I've had great results with a pano I did in Denali a few years ago. Took 6
jpeg images (vertical orientation) around 2 MB each. stitched them together
getting a 54.8 MB file. I the had it printed 3' X 1 '. The detail is
outstanding. Definitely has more left if I want to go larger. Web posting
2008/1/20, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The page says 6-10 weeks...
(not that I have need of such a beast, but it sure is perty).
hmmm...
So they're hedging it now. Well, it's still a step up from unavailable. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
Interestingly enough it comes with a rear drop in circular polarizer. I
wonder if the AF works with the poilarizer in place.
Costs $298.95 for one to fit the 600mm Pentax.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FYI:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 10:09:53PM +0900, David Savage wrote:
And you're basing that statement on what exactly?
Any activity that takes your mind off of whats happening on the road
is potentially dangerous.
Indeed. But multiple studies have shown that it's the act of talking
on the cell
why did they even want to catch them?
Cause the squirrel had nuts.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sigma 500mm f/4.5 now in K-mount
why did they even want to catch them?
I can't seem to remember if I
The answer to the question is 42.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sigma 500mm f/4.5 now in K-mount
On Jan 20, 2008 10:25 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering..will the downloaded
A good capture somewhat lessened by the unfortunate merger of the stationary
bird the rocks in the background.
Curious as to where this image was taken ?
Professional looking web site !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice shot. Couldn't get to this earlier.
Very interesting.
Paul
On Jan 20, 2008, at 1:09 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave, Jack, Marnie, and Christine,
Thanks for looking.
Dave,
No, I don't carry a fence with me :-)
Mayor Daley has decided that a rought iron fence around
Please check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska.
*ist D, 600mm FA, 1.4X-L converter on Gitzo 1548 with Kirk King Cobra head.
Spent several hours observing a pair of wolves feeding on a Caribou taken
down in a river bed.
All
I have also read that there is no improvement with hands free.
IF this is true it would hardly be surprising given the false sense of
security which you would expect to be associated with these smug folk
prattling away.
Except for those who were choking on the hat of their choice of course.
All comments appreciated.
Curious as to your thoughts on the subject matter.
the subject matter is great, but I don't think this composition does
it justice. It feels badly cropped to me, as if you were trying to
rescue something from the shot. The placement of the head is
unbalanced in 2
The subject is interesting.
But I wish you have showed us more. The picture does not tell the whole
story of a predator eating. A bit too family friendly if you get the idea.
But thats me. I may have got your intentions wrong :-)
Tim Typo
- Original Message -
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL
It's a non-discriminational church. 8-)
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/20 Sun PM 06:22:16 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
For the blessing of the fishes? (Isn't this kind of dolphin a mammal?
mike wilson
An interesting film from the early 70s about a bespoke bicycle builder
- Witcomb. They are still working, in fact they're booming at the
moment, with Barry Witcomb still running the place and making frames
by hand. It's in Deptford, about 2 miles from my house. Until November
last year the shop
Thanks Ken,
It was taken at the beach a few minuts walk from my house on Cortes
Island (BC Canada).
Cheers
Francis
Ken Waller wrote:
A good capture somewhat lessened by the unfortunate merger of the stationary
bird the rocks in the background.
Curious as to where this image was taken ?
BTW. I envy you the experiense. Watching wolfs eating must really be
something.
We have some wolfes here in Norway, but they are very hard to track down.
Mainly because they are unpopular.
Tim Typo
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Ken,
That's an excellent picture. I'd like to see more of the series/situation.
This photo is so close and personal... very unusual to see.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 20, 2008 1:48 PM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
I certainly have no issue with the subject matter, but would like to
have seen more of the wolf.
Lighting does suppress some detail, which I miss.
Jack
--- Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Denali
On Jan 20, 2008, at 9:55 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I'm probably snookered here, but the other day I shot some footage of
Erin and her horse, for a sales video. It was with their new Sony HDD
camera, and stupid me set the camera to night mode, thinking that was
back light.(arena very dark)but
On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
Please check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/
id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska.
*ist D, 600mm FA, 1.4X-L converter on Gitzo 1548 with Kirk King
Cobra head.
Spent several hours observing a pair of
Nice. I remember the feeding pics. I'd crop some off the top if it
were mine.
Good work.
Pal
On Jan 20, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Please check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/
id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska.
*ist D, 600mm FA, 1.4X-L
Hi all,
Nice curio: a golden M35/2,8:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=290198190837ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:ITih=019
I assume it did not leave the Pentax factory like this: The KMP does not
list it, and the finish is different from the golden K50/1.2. The seller
could not
Nice view. I think I would take a bit off the right to get rid of
that white blob near the bottom and some off the sky - it is just a
bit too empty. Nice shot.
--
Bruce
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 6:26:25 AM, you wrote:
DS G'day All,
DS Taken this evening (~100kb):
DS
I have to agree with Ken on this - his issues are the same as mine.
--
Bruce
Saturday, January 19, 2008, 1:10:23 PM, you wrote:
KW The cut off masts in the marina shot is distracting.
KW The indoors parking shot suffers from an exposure issue - the outside is
KW somewhat over exposed, while
On Jan 20, 2008 3:41 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice curio: a golden M35/2,8:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=290198190837ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:ITih=019
I assume it did not leave the Pentax factory like this: The KMP does not
list it, and the finish is
Op Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:03:24 +0100 schreef Cymen Vig [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 20, 2008 3:41 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice curio: a golden M35/2,8:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=290198190837ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:ITih=019
I assume it did not leave
Shot at Land's End on the San Francisco peninsula.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO 400, 1/350 sec @ f/11, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5550bw.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 20/01/08, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:
Except for those who were choking on the hat of their choice of course.
Confuscious say, he who chokes last, lives longest :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
There is a lot to like in the photo. Exposure and focus are just
fine. I get the same feeling as BobW on the crop/composition,
however. It feels too tight on the right and the head seems a bit too
low in the shot overall. I'd be curious to know if this is cropped
already or not.
--
Bruce
On 20/01/08, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
So I am sure the capability is out there to do what
you want. That is providing there is some image captured. You might
want to look at some of the video editors out there
Sorry guys, it all boils down to what you've got on the disk, just
Really close Bruce, but you needed a bit wider vertical angle, huh?
Minor maybe, but the rock which at least appears to be touching the top
of the frame, is a distraction to me.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot at Land's End on the San Francisco peninsula.
Pentax K10D, DA*
Very nice concept, conversion, and composition; though
I kinda wish the right-hand rock wasn't decapitated.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot at Land's End on the San Francisco peninsula.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO 400, 1/350 sec @ f/11, Handheld
On 20/01/08, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
re-shoot.
and treat backlighting like the plague. Shoot with the light.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 20/01/08, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Can this be saved by anything. I;m thinking now, and a re shoot next
week is in order.
re-shoot.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I like this one. The couple on the bench are nicely in juxtaposition to the
violent seas. Good work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shot at Land's End on the San Francisco peninsula.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO
In a message dated 1/20/2008 2:41:22 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is a lot to like in the photo. Exposure and focus are just
fine. I get the same feeling as BobW on the crop/composition,
however. It feels too tight on the right and the head seems a bit too
Lovely.
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fortunately, I took quite a few shots here waiting
on waves and such.
So I have taken another image that had the top of
the rock and used it
to finish the top off of this one.
Here is the fixed image:
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
