On Jan 9, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Doug
If I didn't write that line about loving John McPhee and my fave being Rising
from the Plain then will someone fix me up with whoever did ? :-)
I minored in Geology (with and English major) and got honors credits in it...
Discovered
I haven't read the rest of the thread yet, but based on the described
implementation of the OVF and EVF, switching from one to the other with
the camera at eye level could be ugly in operation depending on the
focal length of the lens being used. Maybe that's just a nit, but it's
one among
Based on your comments it would seem that Pentax took everyone at their
word when they said that they wanted a
digital Pentax 110 system, (a really small body, and and 5 or 6 lenses
including a wide angle, a telephoto, a normal, and a telephoto). Except
for the fact that the wide in this case
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks
nicer, but it's not as useful a tool in terms of information provided.
Of course, we're used to all these advantages together with the SLR
so individual
You sure this shouldn't be titled chastity?
On 1/8/2012 9:45 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2012/01/modesty.html
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Miserere wrote:
I, for one, am excited about this camera, which to my mind is what the
X100 should've been from the start.
I agree, except for size. IMO, the X Pro 1 is (so far) the closest thing to
a contemporary rangefinder-style system camera and better than the M9, which
is too fat and
I wrote:
Conceived and built as it is, the X Pro 1 is not far from being just a
different way to make a K-5.
However, I'm interested in the X Pro 1 sensor concept and the advantages it
can deliver once put in a smaller camera body.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Fuji's EXR sensor could be a real advantage if they can perfect it.
The X-10's IQ is very good, especially given the little 2/3 sensor.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
I wrote:
Conceived and built as it is, the X Pro 1 is not far from being just
This will frustrate some, but the price tag is a real hurdle for the
Q. A less well built one, i.e., polycarbonate, might bring it into a
range where it can compete with the the other high end compacts like
the Canon G12. Of course, they could simply stick that zoom on it
permanently and sell
Another thought on this employer buying camera thing.
I do product photography as part of my job at work. I use my own
camera and lenses. I did not have a modern flash for my DSLR and
needed one for an upcoming event shoot. (The governor of Nebraska had
chosen to visit our company's booth at a
I bought my K100DS about 3 weeks before it was discontinued, and it
continues to work fine, three years later. :)
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't be worried anyway. Apparently there is no signal from the
mothership that causes discontinued
Some time ago I purchased 3 rolls of 110 film from the Frugal
Photographer and he messed up and sent me 126 instead.
When I reported the error and that I was really disappointed with my
first order from him, he immediately sent the right stuff and told me
to keep the 126 rolls. I see that he is
Intro videos:
http://tv.adobe.com/show/whats-new-in-lightroom-4-beta
Download link:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom4/
I've only watched the first two videos so far, but the changes look
pretty exciting so far. There is video support, and a new book
module, as well as soft proofing
Forgot to share a couple of links on the subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuhM7McQOpc
http://www.betweenthesprockets.com/?page_id=60
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
When I first got on PDML (back before the flood) I asked about phto'ing
shiny stuff as I had to photo chocolate chips... little did I know
I was shooting them in the packages til I got em. Little crinkly
sacks of glare - the solution was to put polarizers on the light sources
on two lights at
If anyone is ever looking for evidence of my insanity, they probably
need look no farther than the fact that I have just purchased my 2nd
126 camera of the day:
http://elekm.net/pages/cameras/instamatic-500.htm
Called by some the Instamatic Retina.
Found a nice kit with box and manual for far
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 9/1/12, Underpaid N. Overpentaxed, discombobulated, unleashed:
To everyone on this list for not commenting on any photos. While I
very much appreciate your comments on my images and probably would
enjoy your work, too, I will for
been testing it. it's a bit flakey yet, but they've done some very nice things!
G
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:22 AM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Intro videos:
http://tv.adobe.com/show/whats-new-in-lightroom-4-beta
Download link:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom4/
Thanks for all the thoughts. Ann's thought polarizing the light source may
come into play. Certainly a PL on the camera is a minimum.
This will be my first career-class photo work since my studio effort in 1985.
Next stop: Looking @ cameras and lenses. We'll start with used equipment.
These are the lights that I am requesting:
http://mpex.com/interfit-super-coolite-5.html
If the room were larger and better-ventilated,
I'd just use shop lights. It seems these DSLRs
will automatically compensate for any lighting tonality.
And if not, PS and shooting raw covers a multitude
of
Just a thought, will you need perspective correction for any images at all?
Cheers
Ecke
2012/1/10 Collin Brendemuehl coll...@brendemuehl.net:
These are the lights that I am requesting:
http://mpex.com/interfit-super-coolite-5.html
If the room were larger and better-ventilated,
I'd just use
From: Doug Franklin
On 2012-01-09 9:32, Underpaid N. Overpentaxed wrote:
They're there; as usual it is just a matter of reducing your footprint
to match your environment, except this time literally.
Ok, Ecke, point me towards the oracle. Where does one go to find
tropical islands for sale
While shooting, with some intensity, the K-5's shutter suddenly refused to
release. I turned the camera off, but the LED remained frozen.
Turned the camera off and on a couple times, but no change.
Having read of such incidents related on this list, I removed the battery from
its contacts and
- Forwarded Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:39 AM
Subject: 1st K-5 Glitch
While shooting, with some intensity, the K-5's shutter suddenly refused to
release. I turned the camera off, but the
On 1/10/2012 9:54 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Cottycotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 9/1/12, Underpaid N. Overpentaxed, discombobulated, unleashed:
To everyone on this list for not commenting on any photos. While I
very much appreciate your comments on my images and
Very likely if they are parts for imports, like Audi or BMW. Shot
normally they will appear to be overpriced, but with proper
perspective correction the consumer will think he's getting a bargain.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Underpaid N. Overpentaxed
overpenta...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just
I'd not rush the purchase of the polarized filter.
According to the Light book, Ann's PL worked because plastics produce
polarized reflections. But unless your polished and shiny metal parts
are also painted, they will produce unpolarized reflections and so
the polarizing filter will be useless
A fun shot from the Indiana Jones stunt show at Disney:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_3zgwM8#!i=1666851442k=5L6RXTqlb=1s=O
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I've got two of those, at less than $15.00 a piece, I doubt that good
investment will work as justification.
On 1/10/2012 9:51 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
If anyone is ever looking for evidence of my insanity, they probably
need look no farther than the fact that I have just purchased my 2nd
126
The system is telling me that I have an; HTTP 500 Internal Server Error
I've left a message for my geek.
Will attempt the Glitch upload again later
Jack (AAA.)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Well it looks like I won't be using it any time soon. It requires
Vista at a minimum and won't even install on XP.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
been testing it. it's a bit flakey yet, but they've done some very nice
things!
G
On Tue, Jan 10,
On Jan 10, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
- Forwarded Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:39 AM
Subject: 1st K-5 Glitch
While shooting, with some intensity, the K-5's shutter
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks
nicer, but it's not as useful a tool in terms of information provided.
Of course, we're
On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:47 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks
nicer, but it's not as useful a tool
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:39:32AM -0800, Jack Davis wrote:
While shooting, with some intensity, the K-5's shutter suddenly refused to
release. I turned the camera off, but the LED remained frozen.
Turned the camera off and on a couple times, but no change.
Having read of such incidents
Appreciate it Larry..so to speak. ;)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: 1st K-5 Glitch
On Jan 10, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
- Forwarded
Sort of what I expected, John
Thanks!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: John Francis jo...@panix.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: 1st K-5 Glitch
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:39:32AM -0800, Jack Davis wrote:
While
Just to mention, I have the detachable VF-2 to go with my E-P2. It's
essential in bright light.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide
Last evening I scanned another roll of XP2 Super I put through the Leica M4-2.
Took the whole roll with the M-Rokkor 40mm f/2 lens.
Film and digital are two entirely different recording mediums. A 100% manual
camera with no in-camera meter is different in use than any camera with a
built-in
That very much depends on the camera. But from my experience yesterday
with the E-PL1 in bright California sunshine (checking out the 40-150
lens that has mysteriously turned up in my wife's camera kit) I think
the add-on eye-level finder will soon end up in the bag, too.
I use the LCD or an
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14961453
Comments are always appreciated
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
on 2012-01-10 08:38 Collin Brendemuehl wrote
And if not, PS and shooting raw covers a multitude
of lighting sins.
i'd think you could handle that in LightRoom, though getting the lighting right
up front would be most efficient, and that you'd want to stay out of Photoshop
in order to keep
Nice
Dave
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14961453
Comments are always appreciated
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Google Talent Keyhole. Optically these birds are the Hubble with the ability
to swing from one target to another very quickly using 6 gyros with disk
brakes. Pretty clever, The hubble uses the same tech to stay on a target for
hours at a time. KH-xx uses heavy braking, Hubble a finesse braking
From: Collin Brendemuehl
These are the lights that I am requesting:
http://mpex.com/interfit-super-coolite-5.html
If the room were larger and better-ventilated,
I'd just use shop lights. It seems these DSLRs
will automatically compensate for any lighting tonality.
And if not, PS and shooting
From: Steven Desjardins
A fun shot from the Indiana Jones stunt show at Disney:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_3zgwM8#!i=1666851442k=5L6RXTqlb=1s=O
Really needed fill.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
No perspective control needed.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
-Original Message-
From: Underpaid N. Overpentaxed [mailto:overpenta...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:44 AM
To:
Agreed.
And as one shooting expensive sheet film, getting it
right the first time is always best.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
-Original Message-
From: steve harley [mailto:p...@paper-ape.com]
Hmmm...
;-)
Thanks for looking and commenting, Peter, and thanks everyone else.who did the
same.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Sent: January 10, 2012 1/10/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Modesty
You
On 10/1/12, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks
nicer, but it's not as useful a tool in terms of information provided.
Of course, we're used to
Well first of all, Brian, thanks for putting all this together. Great job as
always.
I agree with your assessments (mine excepted, of course). Joe and Dag's were
outstanding examples of the genre, but I have to give a slight nod to Dag's as
my fave.
Generally an outstanding gallery!!
cheers,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:52:24AM -0800, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:47 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote:
IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate
framing and information in non-reflex
Well timed and executed! And you're right, it is a fun shot.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Sent: January 10, 2012 1/10/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Peso: Run!
A fun shot from the Indiana Jones stunt show at Disney:
I know. Next time I'll pack some flares. ;-)
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:05 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
A fun shot from the Indiana Jones stunt show at Disney:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_3zgwM8#!i=1666851442k=5L6RXTqlb=1s=O
2012/1/10 Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com:
Called by some the Instamatic Retina.
Retina display? iNstamatic 5? I want one!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Is anyone able to open the link at the bottom?
I've sent it to someone off-list who was able to open it and I opened the link
on one I pulled up from the archives.
I cannot, however, open the link from either the sent or on-list files.
Thanks!
Jack
- Forwarded Message -
From: Jack
It's very useful to have and eye level finder for long lenses and MF.
In the context of this thread, however, that VF doesn't need to be
optical. The X Pro can switch back and forth between the two, but I
wonder how necessary that really is if the EVF is fairly high res.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at
Nice shot and a great name.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:53 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Matthew Hunt
Do you enjoy canned tuna and belly-rubs?
Not as often as I'd like to.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sure, RedShoulder. I opened it this morning when you originally sent
it. Beautiful!
I think it you're hard-limited to so many gorgeous keepers per month.
An image like that counts for 2.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is anyone able to open the link at the
on 2012-01-10 13:39 Jack Davis wrote
Is anyone able to open the link at the bottom?
if you mean this link to a great shot of a golden eagle in flight, yes
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=622
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
'morning all
I decided to download Nik Silver Efex Pro and give it a whirl.
I've been playing around with a BW conversion of this pano for a few
days but 10 minutes with Nik produced a version that was much better
than any I had been able to achieve,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, at 08:39 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
While shooting, with some intensity, the K-5's shutter suddenly refused
to release. I turned the camera off, but the LED remained frozen.
Turned the camera off and on a couple times, but no change.
Having read of such incidents related on
I'd been wanting to see some results from that s/w.
Very nice. Much better than early digital conversion processes.
It tempts me to drop LF film. But ... not yet.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
That's quite a dramatic image, Brian. Very nice!
Nik software is very powerful stuff and impresses me no end. The
people involved are the industry's best. But their pricing is way too
high for me. $200 for a plugin when Lightroom itself is $200 just
doesn't work for me.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at
On 1/9/12 3:33 PM, Chris Mitchell wrote:
Hi all
Just a few snaps to show that we got together on a rather dull day in
Greenwich on Sunday.
http://www.mitch.myzen.co.uk/mark/
And most enjoyable it was too. A good chat, a stroll through the
clocks and telescopes and the camera obscura at the
Thanks, Steve. I can't and I thought nobody could. First time that's even
happened to me. Frustrating!!!
Thanks!
Jack
PS: It's a Red-shouldered Hawk, but appreciate your elevating it to a Golden
Eagle. ;)
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com
To:
Anyone here using it?
Opinions?
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
'Morning, Brian. Love this. Great lighting and contrast.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:48 PM
Subject: PESO - Pano in Black and White
'morning all
I decided to
From: Joseph McAllister
I really don't know any more than is on the internet about the
technology in use today. My ex is still in the program, but of
course, she can't talk to me like we did when we were both cleared at
the same level. I am personally very jealous of her position. She
left the
Generous remarks, Brian Thanks!
K5, f/8, 1/5000s, AF-C, ISO 800, DA 55~300
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: 1st K-5 Glitch
On Tue, Jan 10,
I assume you mean DA 35/2.8 macro ltd?
One of the best lenses I own; likely the sharpest. Regarded by many as
one of the best lenses money can buy.
I use it as a light-weight street-shooter as well as for plant macros,
which is my main use.
It's too short for bugs. I wish I also had the 100mm
From: Brian Walters
'morning all
I decided to download Nik Silver Efex Pro and give it a whirl.
I've been playing around with a BW conversion of this pano for a few
days but 10 minutes with Nik produced a version that was much better
than any I had been able to achieve,
Very very nice! Sell one image for $200 and buy the s/w
Toine
On 10 January 2012 21:48, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
'morning all
I decided to download Nik Silver Efex Pro and give it a whirl.
I've been playing around with a BW conversion of this pano for a few
days but 10
on 2012-01-10 13:59 Jack Davis wrote
PS: It's a Red-shouldered Hawk, but appreciate your elevating it to a Golden
Eagle. ;)
didn't see the caption at first, and haven't seen a golden in a few years;
after realizing my mistake i found a comparative image (yours is nicer); while
the
talk about just in the nick of time -
nice grab , Jack!
ann
On 1/10/2012 11:39, Jack Davis wrote:
While shooting, with some intensity, the K-5's shutter suddenly refused to release. I
turned the camera off, but the LED remained frozen.
Turned the camera off and on a couple times, but no
Silly punters...
If you have a teacher or student in the family (or want to sign-up for
the possibility of taking classes at your lowest-admissions-fee local
community college)...
: )
You/they can get the entire collection of their plug-ins for Lightroom
and/or Photoshop for $149 (which,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, at 01:16 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Generous remarks, Brian Thanks!
K5, f/8, 1/5000s, AF-C, ISO 800, DA 55~300
Ah, the 55-300. I thought it might be. That lens certainly punches
above it's weight.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Since I'm still in grad school for another 6 months ...
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
-Original Message-
From: Darren Addy [mailto:pixelsmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 04:47
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:40, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14961453
I giggle every time I see those cars. :-)
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
--
On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I assume you mean DA 35/2.8 macro ltd?
One of the best lenses I own; likely the sharpest. Regarded by many as
one of the best lenses money can buy.
I use it as a light-weight street-shooter as well as for plant macros,
which is my main
Thanks, Ann. Just prior to this, I had been holding on a Bald Eagle awaiting
its launch. Have had chances a perching Bald Eagles since last winter about
this time, but yet to get one in anything but distant flight. Had he flown and
the shutter frozen, I'd have needed sedation.
Jack
-
This subject line is fodder for great fantasies around which to spin rumors:
Ricoh is in negotiations to buy Kodak, or their sensor business, so that they
can get the 645D sensors at cost. This will enable them to drop the price of
the 645D to $7,000.
Meanwhile, they are working on developing
I agree Steve, the resemblance is strong.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: Trying Glitch once more
on 2012-01-10 13:59 Jack Davis wrote
PS: It's a
I don't see results like this often unless it's done with NIK. Are sure
it's not worth $200.00??. If you want me to twist your arm consider it
twisted. That will be $200 please.
Oh it does help I suppose to start with a wonderful original like this one.
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012
Don't forget that the 645E will be pocketable. Because, apparently,
that is what sells cameras; if you can jam them into a pocket.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
This subject line is fodder for great fantasies around which to spin rumors:
Ricoh is in
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I assume you mean DA 35/2.8 macro ltd?
One of the best lenses I own; likely the sharpest. Regarded by many as
one of the best lenses money can buy.
I use it as a
My books arrived this afternoon. In my biased opinion, they don't suck.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Did it go the Arizona, Larry?
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: 1st K-5 Glitch
On Jan 10, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
- Forwarded Message
Glad they are suckless. Good luck with them!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 2:25 PM
Subject: blurbage
My books arrived this afternoon. In my biased opinion, they don't suck.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, at 10:29 PM, Toine wrote:
Very very nice! Sell one image for $200 and buy the s/w
Toine
Thanks, Toine.
It did occur to me that anyone selling prints could easily justify the
cost. At this stage I'm not, but maybe.
Cheers
Brian
++
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, at 03:47 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Silly punters...
If you have a teacher or student in the family (or want to sign-up for
the possibility of taking classes at your lowest-admissions-fee local
community college)...
: )
You/they can get the entire collection of their
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, at 04:22 PM, Don Guthrie wrote:
I don't see results like this often unless it's done with NIK. Are sure
it's not worth $200.00??.
As I mentioned to Toine, it probably is if you're selling prints. At
this stage, though, my financial priorities are elsewhere, assuming
LOL. Epic parking.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:40, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14961453
I giggle every time I see those cars. :-)
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson -
On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Don't forget that the 645E will be pocketable. Because, apparently,
that is what sells cameras; if you can jam them into a pocket.
Only with big pockets, and the E-mount wide angle pancake lens. With the
pancake lens, it'll be about the
When I converted a few photos from Saturday to BW, my first reaction was that
they looked a lot like they were shot in IR and converted to IR:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/6665740329/in/set-72157628790152079
Then I realized that Marcus was lit by very red light, which is pretty close to
The old 19th c. images had no blue sensitivity,
so they had a very similar appearance.
Removing blue would give a similar result as adding red.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
-Original Message-
On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I assume you mean DA 35/2.8 macro ltd?
One of the best lenses I own; likely the sharpest. Regarded by many as
one of the best lenses money can buy.
I use it as a light-weight
On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I assume you mean DA 35/2.8 macro ltd?
duh.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From Sundays drive around whilst checking school buses at one of our
satellite yards.
Ice cold:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14962836
K-5 D FA 50-200
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario,
Jack,
I know it's a subtle difference, but he said they don't suck. He didn't
say they were totally devoid of suck.
Suck has many subtle variations.
Cory
Not sending erectile dysfunction mail today.
On 1/10/2012 5:32 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Glad they are suckless. Good luck with them!
Jack
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
