Most of these were PESOs in the past week, but continuiong my tradition
of my monthly faves:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157636893059015/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You had a damned good month, Larry. Every one of those is excellent.
I would love to see a bw conversion of 14718, though. It seems
tailor-made for that kind of treatment to my eye.
-- Walt
On 11/2/2013 1:20 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Most of these were PESOs in the past week, but continuiong
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:41:47AM -0500, Walt Gilbert wrote:
You had a damned good month, Larry. Every one of those is excellent.
Thanks a bunch.
I would love to see a bw conversion of 14718, though. It seems
tailor-made for that kind of treatment to my eye.
Since you asked:
Excellent set. That swirly beach on Big Sur is excellent, and looks like one
that Ansel Adams photographed.
Mind you, it's a beach. They all look like he photographed them. Or Erwitt.
B
On 2 Nov 2013, at 06:20, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Most of these were PESOs in the past week,
On 2 Nov 2013, at 04:30, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:21 am, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Spent an hour or so at the Sacramento Zoo this PM. Attaching shot of an Elf
owl. Bird book best comparison is a Screech!?
Very nice. Looks like he's thinking
Well, a couple of posts on DPReview think it looks like a K-5 from the side...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_LV7qRCJyA
Is this a DSLR then? Pentaprism looks too big to be a morrorless...
Nikon taking note of Fuji success here methinks. Coming couple of years
will be interesting
--
Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap on the A 28/2.8
with a uv filter. Recently I thought I ordered 49 and 67 mm uv filters [Tiffen]
for use as lens protectors on two other lenses. When the order arrived I had
two 67 mm flyers, one uv, one uv haze.
My first thought was
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Eric Weir
Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap
on the A 28/2.8 with a uv filter. Recently I thought I
ordered 49 and 67 mm uv filters [Tiffen] for use as lens
protectors on two other lenses. When the order
what a load of old bollocks those Nikon ads are.
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
Sent: 02 November 2013 10:44
To: pentax list
Subject: Nikon Retro Video - Pentax content
Well, a couple of posts on DPReview think it looks
First, there is the resolution reduction, however slight, caused by requiring
the light to pass through two additional glass surfaces.
For me, the filter glass clarity is a bothersome unknown.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 2/11/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
the other is wrong, an
abomination in the sight of the Lord, and should be dragged behind horses
through the streets of olde Londonne Towne, then burnt on a pyre built from
their land and holdings. Yea, verily.
I stopped using filters for this
Superb! I'd really like to have this lens!
Now, where's my *** TC they promised already
i-dont-remember-how-many years ago?
BR, Margus
On 11/1/2013 15:40, Darren Addy wrote:
HD PENTAX-DA 20-40mm F2.8-4 ED Limited DC WR
On 2/11/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
what a load of old bollocks those Nikon ads are.
You really are a grumpy old fucker aren't you.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
A*85/1.4 with a good vintage Chateaneuf-du-Pape.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Jack Davis
First, there is the resolution reduction, however slight,
caused by requiring the light to pass through two additional glass
surfaces.
For me, the filter glass clarity is a bothersome unknown.
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
On 2/11/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
what a load of old bollocks those Nikon ads are.
You really are a grumpy old fucker aren't you.
that's why I'm here.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Nice set of photos Larry!
Godfrey
On Nov 2, 2013, at 2:39 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Excellent set. That swirly beach on Big Sur is excellent, and looks like one
that Ansel Adams photographed.
Mind you, it's a beach. They all look like he photographed them. Or Erwitt.
B
Tiffen filters are often ok glass-wise, but often have cheap, aluminum mounts
with sharply cut threads that can damage plastic and soft metal lens mounting
threads if not handled carefully. They are also prone to getting jammed and
being difficult to remove.
Haze vs UV vs UV Haze for
From the Pentax
Forums:http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/241252-visit-quebec-city-photo-expo-discussion-reps-many-interesting-things.html#post2561524
Get the hat out Cotty, if its true
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
Nice Blog article and great images, BTW. Congrats.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jeffery Johnson
jefferytjohn...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Lisa Taron wrote about me and Photo Captures by Jeffery on her blog, The Pet
Blog Lady. If you
Bob, remember I wrote, however slight and bothersome unknown. Said concerns
are not controllable.
OTOH, I find filters often justified to achieve a photo effect sought.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Here's how to make the unknown known, or at least less bothersome.
Take some pictures of the same things in the same conditions with and
without filters. Compare and contrast. Decide.
Thanks, Bob. Guess I'll just have to
Now, that looks tempting, even at this hour of the morning!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Taken at the local brewpub on Wednesday night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/10620873883/
--
Looks more to me like a melding of FM, F3 and modern Dxxx aesthetics in the
styling. As we all know, that's the important part.
Seriously, however, I look forward to seeing what Nikon has come up with. A
modernized Digital F would be nice ... It would keep my Fs company. :-)
Godfrey
On Nov
Strong image. I like the POV; for some reason, most owl image are
full frontal.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Spent an hour or so at the Sacramento Zoo this PM. Attaching shot of an Elf
owl.
More of the sane old same old.
Paul via phone
On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:13 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From the Pentax
Forums:http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/241252-visit-quebec-city-photo-expo-discussion-reps-many-interesting-things.html#post2561524
Strong gallery!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Most of these were PESOs in the past week, but continuiong my tradition
of my monthly faves:
I stopped using filters for protection around the same time. A halfway decent
filter turns a great lens into a halfway decent lens.
Paul via phone
On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
Tiffen filters are often ok glass-wise, but often have cheap, aluminum mounts
And more lenses coming to re-ignite LBL in those of us who thought that they
had finally acquired everything they needed.
I've seen the Roadmap but haven't given it much thought (apart from noting the
1.4x TC), The encouraging element here for me is that it seems more like Ricoh
is really
That about sums up my opinion.
stan
On Nov 2, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Bob W wrote:
an
abomination in the sight of the Lord, and should be dragged behind horses
through the streets of olde Londonne Towne, then burnt on a pyre built from
their land and holdings. Yea, verily.
--
PDML
Thanks Dan I do appreciate that a whole lot.
On 11/2/2013 8:15 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nice Blog article and great images, BTW. Congrats.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Jeffery Johnson
jefferytjohn...@bellsouth.net wrote:
I consider both haze and UV filters as correcting and have used both. UV
especially come to mind when shooting at higher altitudes.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2013 6:09 AM
Probably asking, why am I so fascinating? The tiny thing was being held
sitting on a leather glove worn by an extremely patient zoo docent.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: David Mann dmann...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 9:30
Thanks, Brian! I'll pass it on to luck and my DA50~135. ;-)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: Sac. Zoo Owl
Quoting Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com:
Thanks for commenting, Bob!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2013 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: Sac. Zoo Owl
On 2 Nov 2013, at 04:30, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at
On 11/2/13 7:24 AM, Bob W wrote:
the other is wrong, an abomination in the sight of the Lord, and
should be dragged behind horses through the streets of olde Londonne
Towne, then burnt on a pyre built from their land and holdings. Yea,
verily.
you forgot the salting of the earth part and the
Yes, there were some of those full frontals but for a number reasons,
including the background,
Glad I did, I find the white of the eye especially interesting and it's
probably due to side lighting.(?)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To:
On 02/11/2013 5:00 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap on the A 28/2.8
with a uv filter. Recently I thought I ordered 49 and 67 mm uv filters [Tiffen]
for use as lens protectors on two other lenses. When the order arrived I had
two 67 mm flyers,
On 02/11/2013 6:37 AM, Bob W wrote:
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
On 2/11/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
what a load of old bollocks those Nikon ads are.
You really are a grumpy old fucker aren't you.
that's why I'm here.
Thanks for
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
More of the sane old same old.
It must be true, how can you ignore an internet forum that banned Bill Robb.
Dave
Paul via phone
On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:13 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From the
You really did have a great month! Couple of those would make a great
year for me, especially the sleeping seals 16035, and tidal pool
(16548). Nice sunset! (15816)
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Most of these were PESOs in the past week, but continuiong my
Bill's right.
For protection, buy a lens hood.
It also improves contrast and reduces flare in your lens.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/11/2013 5:00 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap
They banned Wheatfield Willy? Bastards!!! Who's keeping them honest?!!
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:25 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
More of the sane old same old.
It must be true, how can you ignore
And big lens hoods impress the ladies.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill's right.
For protection, buy a lens hood.
It also improves contrast and reduces flare in your lens.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Bill
Larry, it looks like a nice selection of thought out images!
Nice job!
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: October best of
Most of these were PESOs in the past week, but continuiong my tradition
of my monthly faves:
On 11/2/2013 9:22 AM, Bill wrote:
On 02/11/2013 5:00 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap on the A
28/2.8 with a uv filter. Recently I thought I ordered 49 and 67 mm uv
filters [Tiffen] for use as lens protectors on two other lenses. When
the
Looks to me like tasting flight plus two !
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: PESO tasting flight plus one
Taken at the local brewpub on Wednesday night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/10620873883/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
On 11/2/2013 2:13 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:41:47AM -0500, Walt Gilbert wrote:
You had a damned good month, Larry. Every one of those is excellent.
Thanks a bunch.
I would love to see a bw conversion of 14718, though. It seems
tailor-made for that kind of treatment to
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 12:04:20PM -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Looks to me like tasting flight plus two !
The tasting flights at BC Breweryof one of everything (except the
premium or whatever they call it) on tap.
Looking on facebook, this seems to be their tap list:
Golden Promise ESB
I've always used UV filters on all my lenses, except the 600. Mine are all
Pentax or top end B+W. I have polarizers for most of my lenses which are used
when the occasion calls for them. Use to have numerous other filters when I
shot film, which are mostly not needed now with digital. Filters
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:39:09AM +, Bob W wrote:
Excellent set. That swirly beach on Big Sur is excellent, and looks like one
that Ansel Adams photographed.
Thanks a bunch. It is McWay falls in Big Sur. I tried to find an Adams
photo of it, but all I found was a comment that they
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 11:11:38AM -0500, Walt Gilbert wrote:
On 11/2/2013 2:13 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:41:47AM -0500, Walt Gilbert wrote:
You had a damned good month, Larry. Every one of those is excellent.
Thanks a bunch.
I would love to see a bw conversion of
Where I go, a flight is what they bring me on the serving board.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: Re: PESO tasting flight plus one
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 12:04:20PM -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Looks to me like tasting flight plus two !
The tasting
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 11:24:19AM -, Bob W wrote:
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Eric Weir
There are 2 schools of thought on using clear filters for protecting lenses.
One rational and sensible school of thought is that it is a good idea and
doesn't do any
On 2/11/13, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
From the Pentax
Forums:http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/241252-
visit-quebec-city-photo-expo-discussion-reps-many-interesting-
things.html#post2561524
Get the hat out Cotty, if its true
a link that works:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
The only time I use filters is when I need a polarizer. If you want
protection, buy a lens hood.
Bill's right.
For protection, buy a lens hood.
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 12:27:20PM -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Where I go, a flight is what they bring me on the serving board.
Yeah, you would bitch about getting a couple extra beers in your
flight.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: Re: PESO
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Tiffen filters are often ok glass-wise, but often have cheap, aluminum mounts
with sharply
cut threads that can damage plastic and soft metal lens mounting threads if
not handled
carefully. They are also prone to getting jammed and being difficult to
remove.
Haze vs
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:13 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From the Pentax
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Yeah, you would bitch about getting a couple extra beers in your
flight.
It's dangerous to be on an overweight flight.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I'll confirm everything Godfrey wrote and add one more detail:
ordinary lens glass filters out virtually all UV. I have a friend who
occasionally shoots UV and he has to use a special fluorite glass lens
to do so
On 2 Nov 2013, at 14:26, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/11/2013 6:37 AM, Bob W wrote:
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
On 2/11/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
what a load of old bollocks those Nikon ads are.
You really are a
Eric, my first two FA Limited lenses came with matching SMC UV filters
(one silver, one black to match the lens barrel colors). Beside these,
I'm using only B+W filters. Normally my more valuable lenses have
protective filters attached. Israel is a dusty country, thus I prefer to
have to clean
On 2 Nov 2013, at 13:09, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
[...]. I await the Mongol Horde of filter extremists and their flaming swords
... Perhaps I'll offer them tea
...and a filter-tipped Camel
Godfrey
On Nov 2, 2013, at 4:00 AM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Reply interspersed:
On 11/2/2013 5:27 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
p21 As an element in E-Dial Programming, it is now possible to change
dial direction from the default. Create your own logic for whether a
rightward/leftward turn of theFront/Rear dials will increase or
decrease EV.
I think the same
I use a Pentax SMC UV filter on my A* 200 macro for lens protection, and
I have not noticed any degradation in the image quality. Every now and
then I wind up having to remove and clean the UV filter due to a major
problem - like when the rig tips over and goes lens first into muck. It
is a
E.g. - what is the filter thread diameter of this lens? What is its
weight/size? Is it full frame? What is its MSRP?
These are the questions that I find important. The pictures from the net
can serve as a trigger for discussion, no more than that.
Boris
On 11/2/2013 3:12 AM, Zos Xavius
On 2 Nov 2013, at 16:05, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/2/2013 9:22 AM, Bill wrote:
On 02/11/2013 5:00 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap on the A 28/2.8
with a uv filter. Recently I thought I ordered 49 and 67 mm uv filters
On 02/11/2013 10:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 9:13 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From the Pentax
I can hardly see how a sword can be made from a lens filter... At best
it can be turned to a shuriken...
On 11/2/2013 7:09 PM, Bob W wrote:
On 2 Nov 2013, at 13:09, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
[...]. I await the Mongol Horde of filter extremists and their flaming swords
...
If diversity is life, then, Larry, you're very much alive.
On 11/2/2013 8:20 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Most of these were PESOs in the past week, but continuiong my tradition
of my monthly faves:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157636893059015/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 2 Nov 2013, at 16:38, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
The only time I use filters is when I need a polarizer. If you want
protection,
On 11/2/2013 3:42 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Corporate commitment is the phrase that comes to mind. Maybe it is
just about a really good sales VP who has been successful in
communicating an optimistic tone down through the sales and
distribution rank and file, but it really seems more positive than
I make my swords out of ploughshares.
B
On 2 Nov 2013, at 17:15, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
I can hardly see how a sword can be made from a lens filter... At best it can
be turned to a shuriken...
On 11/2/2013 7:09 PM, Bob W wrote:
On 2 Nov 2013, at 13:09, Godfrey DiGiorgi
To clean a lens or filter brush lightly with a soft camel hair brush to remove
particles. Then spray a small bit of ROR residual oil remover and wipe with a
spotless microfiber lens cloth.
Paul via phone
On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013,
Eric Weir wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
I'll confirm everything Godfrey wrote and add one more detail:
ordinary lens glass filters out virtually all UV. I have a friend who
occasionally shoots UV and he has to use a special fluorite glass
A couple of incidental notes:
Scratches on the front element of a lens have *very* little effect on
image quality (unless there are so many of them that veiling flare
starts to reach intolerable levels). Scratches on the *rear* element
of a lens are much more dangerous. Protect that rear element
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013, Bill wrote:
The only time I use filters is when I need a polarizer. If you want
protection, buy a lens hood.
There was a post a while back on lensrentals.com that said roughly the
same thing.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Replies interspersed with your interspersed replies:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Reply interspersed:
On 11/2/2013 5:27 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
p21 As an element in E-Dial Programming, it is now possible to change
dial direction from the default. Create your own logic
It's only dangerous at the end of the flight.
Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Yeah, you would bitch about getting a couple extra beers in your
flight.
It's dangerous to be on an overweight flight.
--
Sent from my
Which brings up the most compelling reason for Ricoh to tell release a full
frame Pentax. So people will quit holding off on other purchases.
Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/2/2013 3:42 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Corporate commitment is the phrase that comes to mind. Maybe it is
just
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
It's only dangerous at the end of the flight.
I guess that's why you dump fuel before landing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Is that the place we went to while I was out there?
If so, they make a pretty tasty brew.
-- Walt
On 11/2/2013 12:19 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Taken at the local brewpub on Wednesday night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/10620873883/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 02:03:24PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
A couple of incidental notes:
This may be the out of context quote of the week:
he's a very good photographer outside the morgue and has won prizes
for his landscapes in juried competitions.
--
Larry Colen
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 03:00:56PM -0500, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Is that the place we went to while I was out there?
Probably. There's only one brewpub in the valley, for any others
we have to drive 8-12 miles in the other direction to go to one
of the brewpubs in Santa Cruz.
If so, they make a
Thanks Boris.
That might be the best compliment I've gotten since a teacher in high school
said I reminded him off the poster about marching to the beat of a different
drummer.
Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
If diversity is life, then, Larry, you're very much alive.
On 11/2/2013 8:20
Just on he subject of cleaning lenses - I keep a clean handkerchief in
one back pocket. Stout blow of hot breath on the element and a good wipe
round with the hanky and hey presto. I do that with my A*85/1.4 (500
quid) and my Canon TV motorized zoom lens lens (5000 quid) and never had
a problem.
Automotive miscegenation
http://jacksonville.craigslist.org/cto/4166690569.html
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
The volume command (vol [drive:]) will display the volume name. Use the
label command to set the volume name.
http://tinyurl.com/elaet
-p
On 11/1/2013 10:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://pcsupport.about.com/od/termsv/g/volume-label.htm
I'm not a Windows user, but that page seems to
Yeah, you would bitch about getting a couple extra beers in your
flight.
I doubt it, but I wouldn't title the resulting photo 'tasting flight plus
one'.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject:
It must be true, how can you ignore an internet forum that banned Bill
Robb.
YO MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: full frame??
On 02/11/2013 10:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
on the K-3 in addition to Distortion Correction and Lateral Aberration
Correction, they have added Peripheral Illumination Correction
I've been thinking about this function. The lens correction functions only work
on more recent DA-era lenses:
Very nice! A good character study.
You said that the owl was handheld; was the camera handheld as well? A double
challenge?!?
stan
On Nov 2, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Yes, there were some of those full frontals but for a number reasons,
including the background,
Glad I did, I
Thank you, Eric, Dan, knarf and Godfrey :-)
29. okt. 2013 kl. 19:33 skrev Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net:
On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:15 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
Ricoh GR, 18.3mm, 1/60s, f2.8, ISO560
Love it. Simple,
Yes;-) The owl was being hand held by a leather gloved zoo docent while I shot
hand held.
Thanks for commenting, Stan.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2013 4:44 PM
I use a COTTON handkerchief or the tail of my COTTON t-shirt after a puff of
not breath.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2013 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: Filters?
Just on he subject of
Same here. I usually do a very light swipe first in the event there's a
grain of sand or something like that which could potentially be hard
enough to scratch the coating, but after that, a couple of breaths and a
cotton t-shirt works like a charm.
-- Walt
On 11/2/2013 6:57 PM, Jack Davis
On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
on the K-3 in addition to Distortion Correction and Lateral Aberration
Correction, they have added Peripheral Illumination Correction
Is this working in RAW mode or just with jpegs?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
G'day all
Another fine gallery and one of the largest this year.
I like them all but Ken's 'Taos' is my favourite. I like its
simplicity and the combination of curves and straight lines - also, it
brings back pleasant memories (I was there not long ago...)
As usual, you'll find the
I used to do that and after about twenty years of cleaning my vivitar 200/3.5
that way I gave it a good look and realized the front element was pretty much
trashed. So now I'm cautious.
Paul via phone
On Nov 2, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
I use a COTTON
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
