ROTFLMAO!!
Paul
On Mar 5, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> http://www.hi5.com/friend/profile/displayProfile.do?userid=1464592
>
>> Usu või mitte, aga see kutt on ka kurt, ja arvatavasti modell või siis
>> vähemalt tal on kõik eeldused selleks saad
Great stuff, Mark. I was thinking about you the other day when I saw
some fine snow coming down on a very cold day. That's Cassino snow:-).
Paul
On Mar 5, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Tom C wrote:
> Those are absolutely breath-taking Mark! The fourth is also a nice
> variation, not showing the edges.
>
>
>
Yes it does. I haven't tried it. Just noticed it the other day in fact.
I have half a dozen diffusers of various types. The slide-out panel is
probably last on my list, but I'll give it a try.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2007, at 9:03 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:24:14PM -0500, John S
Great. Thanks Godders. I do use trailing curtain now and then. I was
concerned about that.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:05 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> For Pentax K10D users:
> Looks like they fixed the trailing curtain flash synch issue that
> broke on v1.10
>
> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/
You captured the moment. Very nice. I like the composition and
rendering as well.
On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On a walk yesterday ...
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/12.htm
>
> Comments, critique, and the usual foofawraw all appreciated. :-)
>
> enjoy
I like this. I might have tried to put the ball behind the tree, but
I'm not sure that would be an improvement.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Tom C wrote:
> Thanks Adam and Bruce...
>
> This was another one from Saturday when I took a break from skiing. I
> saw
> the sun getting lower and t
Excellent shot of a pretty girl. What more could one ask for? Thanks
for sharing.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> I was cleaning out some stuff in my studio this morning and ran across
> an
> ild print from the 60's. It was shot in Singapore while I was awaiting
> a
>
I uploaded the firmware update to an SD card and installed it in the
camera. Now, when I go to format the car, the camera says it's locked.
I put the card in my Mac, and it says I don't have sufficient
privileges to reformat it. What can I do? Godders?
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
the shell. If you are not familiar
> with unix, be very careful about using the "rm" command--make sure you
> are in the right directory!
>
> This should do. Strange though that you'd end up with no permissions
> to write in that card.
>
> j
>
>
>
>
&g
y CF
cards. No failures in three years. SD SUCKS! :-(
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I uploaded the firmware update to an SD card and installed it in the
> camera. Now, when I go to format the car, the camera says it's locked.
> I put the card in my Mac, and it
Yeah, I'll try. I think it was B&H. They're usually pretty good about
returns.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:28 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Now that shouldn't happen. Take it back where you bought it and yell
> at
> them.
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Okay, I
The K10D is larger than the *istD. Probably about halfway between the
size of the D and that Nikon. I own both the Sigma Super and the Pentax
FGZ. The Pentax flash is far more predictable and accurate. The Sigma
is okay, but it's no match for the real thing.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 4:37 PM, J wr
As someone pointed out to me, there's a halo on the right front tire.
That's generally the result of oversharpening, although I see nothing
else here to support that. In any case, it's not important. The lens
performed well, as did the photographer.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 6:48 PM, J. C. O'Conne
Things are slow on the old list tonight. This might provide some
amusement. No danger of this young lady catching me catching her. This
is with the DA 50-200 BTW. I used to strap on the FA 50 when I moved
indoors. But with SR, I can usually shoot some indoor lighting pics
with the DA 50-200. Br
Hey, why stop now? Another pic from the same afternoon in the same
coffee shop. But totally different light. Same lens: the DA 50-200
workhorse. This lady isn't giving her friend the finger.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5687954&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.
What Bill said. Shooting RAW I find I have a very wide range over which
I can extract good detail.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:39 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist"
> Subject: Re: beauty shot: Pentax K10D- 17mm lenses are out t
44 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey, why stop now? Another pic from the same afternoon in the same
>> coffee shop. But totally different light. Same lens: the DA 50-200
>> workhorse. This lady isn't giving her frie
I'm right with you on the DA 200/2.8. But I don't see that I need the
DA 55, unless it can be shown that it substantially outperforms the
slightly faster FA 50/.4
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:57 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Hamilton"
> Subject: Lens Roadmap
>
>
ing
situation.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:05 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Or at least in photographs they wont thank you for...
>
> William Robb wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Paul Stenquist"
>> Subject: PESO: Signing
>>
>>
>
It's a carefully developed skill:-). I am put to sleep by pretty
pictures of beautiful people.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:41 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist"
> Subject: PESO: Signing
>
>
>> Hey, why stop now?
What John said. I'm amazed at the detail that can be extracted from
fifty-year-old, faded transparencies. There's more there than meets
they eye.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:08 PM, John Celio wrote:
>> Another thing that was interesting about the "find", of the numerous
>> old
>> photo's I found
Nothing like slow glass to keep one honest. Hey, who needs zooms when
you can have slow primes :-)).
Paul
On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:09 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist"
> Subject: Re: Lens Roadmap
>
>
>> I'm
when
she's signing. It's motion blur. It's not a flattering picture of the
lady, but it's an accurate example of what goes on in a signing
conversation: Lots of extreme facial expressions. I guess they help
convey meaning.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 4:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
&g
wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5687917&size=lg
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5687954&size=lg
>
> Sorry, Paul, these two really do little for me. I never really liked
> the "voyeuristic" st
photographer and subject was made, but without
> direct influence on the subject's ability to be natural and unposed.
>
> There are of course many appealing photos taken without the subjects'
> being aware of the camera too ... One of the favorites of this genre
> that I'
gt;> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> I like the shot alot. Nut Hatches just don't seem to stay still for
>>> very
>>> long. Even when perched they seem to constantly be twitching.
>>>
>>> I know everyone's got a feeling about the white sky, which
This is a rather large collection of photos taken on a half mile
stretch of suburban Detroit's Old Woodward Avenue. It will hopefully
end up as an eight to twelve shot gallery show and magazine article. I
may decide to convert more shots to BW. I might make the set all BW, or
I might make it al
This is a rather large collection of photos taken on a half mile
stretch of suburban Detroit's Old Woodward Avenue. It will hopefully
end up as an eight to twelve shot gallery show and magazine article. I
may decide to convert more shots to BW. I might make the set all BW, or
I might make it al
Wow. The Grinch Who Stole Summer. Looks like someone needs to enter the
next mayoral election. I'll be your campaign manager.:-)
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 3:28 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Photographed at the local town beach.
>
> http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/nfa.html
>
> --
> Entropy Semina
oks more like "Gag me with a forefinger".
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> Hey, why stop now? Another pic from the same afternoon in the same
>> coffee shop. But totally
collection.
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: GESO: It Happened on Woodward
>> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:41:53 -0500
>>
>> Thi
ed Nuthatch
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>
>>>> I like the shot alot. Nut Hatches just don't seem to stay still for
>>>> very
>>>> long. Even when perched they seem to constantly be twitching.
>>>>
>>>&
tograph in the coffeeshop.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5690796
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: GESO: It Happened
oyeuristic." Perhaps some list members are a bit fixated on sordid
things:-). And you keep your hands off those shoppers Mr. Cotty:-)).
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 5:33 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 7/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> to be honest, all street
>> photo
Some nice compositions here. Fun stuff.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 5:48 PM, Bob W wrote:
> Mike,
>
> can you try this please? You'll need to flush your buffers first to
> force a visit to my server.
>
> http://www.web-options.com/Phone/
>
> --
> Bob
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL
Nudity is apparently okay as well. Who says they're no fun?
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 5:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/7/2007 12:32:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Photographed at the local town beach.
>
> http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/
Yeah, I kind of figured that:-).
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:29 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Nudity falls under a Connecticut General statute and doesn't have to be
> posted to be enforced.
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Nudity is apparently okay as well. Who says they're
Based on observation, I'd say "Ready for Review" means they haven't
looked at it yet. "On hold" means they looked at it and they're not
sure they want it, but they're going to hold off on declining it until
they see if they get better material.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote
Oooh, I like t his. Missed it earlier. I'd just go ahead and clone that
buoy out of there.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:33 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> It's a navigational buoy, a "black" can. The coast guard started
> painting them green about 25 years ago, takes all of the challenge out
> of findin
Okay, so the white sky sucks. I went back and reshot that bird when the
sky was better. I found him in exactly the same place. Imagine that!
:-))
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5691710&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm
Thanks Brandan. Interestingly enough, Cell Lady was shot with the much
maligned Pentax 80-320.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> Birmingham Gentleman, Cell Lady, Chimping...all gems,
> Paul.
>
> -Brendan
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ask?
>
> You devil!
>
> -Brendan
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Okay, so the white sky sucks. I went back and reshot
>> that bird when the
>> sky was better. I found him in exactly the same
>> place. Imagine that!
>> :-))
>
Who told you it was a fake bird? Dammit, I bet it was Cotty!
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Tom C wrote:
> That's one of those little fake birds from the craft store. :-)
>
> Yes it's better.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTEC
for Photoshop , If you
> like I
> can search for the link again...
> Markus
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:43 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Su
Rick Womer wrote:
> It's nailed to the perch!
>
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Okay, so the white sky sucks. I went back and reshot
>> that bird when the
>> sky was better. I found him in exactly the same
>> place. Imagine t
Yep. And proud of it. Just wish I was better. But I'm still learning.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> PS geek! ;-))
>
> Jack
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Okay, so the white sky sucks. I went back and reshot that bird
> foreground/background depth separation. It's easy enough to try if the
> original is just a series of different layers. It won't look so much
> like a
> cut & paste job then.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> At 12:23 PM 8/03/2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Marnie. Lots of fun.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 12:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/7/2007 4:12:53 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Okay, so the white sky sucks. I went back and reshot that bird when
> the
> sky was better. I found him in exac
1
> +45 23 43 85 77
> Skype: jensbladt248
>
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
> Paul
> Stenquist
> Sendt: 8. marts 2007 04:22
> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Emne: Re: Went back and reshot the damn bir
On the AF 560FGZ you can dial in flash compensation. With a flash like
the AF400T in auto mode, I set the flash for f11 and set the camera
manually to f8, if I want minus one stop fill.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
> How do you get the K10D to shoot fill flash. That is less
I think Ryan was being facetious.
On Mar 8, 2007, at 8:14 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> I thought you meant the 18-200. Seems a bit excessive for a walk about
> lens. And a bit limiting unless you plan to take photos from blocks
> away.
>
> Ryan Lee wrote:
>> The link on that page is javascript, b
Thanks Mike. A little theater is a good thing.
On Mar 8, 2007, at 3:57 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2007/03/08 Thu AM 12:05:23 GMT
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Went back and reshot the
I use both versions of ACR. There's no difference in how much range one
can extract from a RAW file. ACR2 just offers more control over what
falls in between the extremes, via curves.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 7:51 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Interesting, I would have thought that it would do better
Yes, it was selected for the Collection, whatever that might be. That
fade in/out must be something new (or an error).
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> Paul, I saw one of your pics from the Woodward Ave link on the Pentax
> Gallery site. I was previewing my submissions and
Subject: RE: Went back and reshot the damn bird!
>
>
>> That's one of those little fake birds from the craft store. :-)
>>
>> Yes it's better.
>>
>> Tom C.
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>&g
Yes, I said it backwards. F8 on the flash, f11 on the camera. Senility
strikes again.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 2:54 PM, David Oswald wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> On the AF 560FGZ you can dial in flash compensation. With a flash like
>> the AF400T in auto mode, I set the flash
Not for stock. It's Hollywood, my dear:-).
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 3:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/8/2007 10:56:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Actually, the tree, the bird and the sky are all fake. They're nothing
> but pixels!
> Paul
>
> =
Super Glue works every time:-).
On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
> nice Paul, congratulate your nut hatch wrangler for getting him o pose
> the same
>
> russ
>
> On 3/7/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Okay, so the white sky suck
He landed here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5691710&size=lg
On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Peter Lacus wrote:
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5672710&size=lg
> --
> Problem with Your Input
> We had a problem processing your entry:
>
>This photo d
I managed to open my card and remove the button that was stock inside.
I then reassembled the card with cyanoacrylite glue. It goes in the
camera fine, but it still says it's locked. And it has no lock button.
I'm going to try to unlock it on the computer as described by Juan
Buhler the other d
Nice. Another excellent pic.
On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Tom C wrote:
> Lots of nice weather this morning. A seasonal waterfall appears close
> to
> home in the late winter/early spring. It's a 1 mile journey in the
> opposite
> direction of work once I get to the state highway.
>
>
> http://w
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
Enjoy.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Nathan Berry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am rather new to the SLR world and am looking for a reference to all
> the lingo and acronyms used when describing lenses. Terms such as FA,
> SMC, A, M, Prime, M42, AF, IF…
>
> Some of these I
When I've loaded scanned files from Pentax film cameras, I get the drop
down menus that allow me to pick a camera, lens and lens series.
However, none of these can be left blank. If the lens is unknown or not
listed, you have to specify "unknown." I've uploaded both LX and 6x7
pics without
That's a pretty good rendering for a flash picture. My only niggle
would be the lack of DOF. But overall, you're off to a good start. I
would recommend staying with ProPhotoRGB for conversion and master file
storage. Change color space as necessary for web (srgb) and perhaps
printing. (I print
Okay, that's what I need to do. Another super glue operation coming up.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Tomasz Machnik wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:55:03 -0500
> Doug Franklin (Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
>> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder if there's a way to set
>>>
I'm kind of liking this. But most interestingly, it shows off the
capabilities of the DA 12-24 and the K10D. From shadow detail to
highlights and overall sharpness, I was pleased with this capture. DA
12-24 @ 12mm, f9, 1/250th, ISO 160, TAv mode.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=56963
Thanks Cotty. And thanks for the suggestion as well.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 7/3/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Okay, so the white sky sucks. I went back and reshot that bird when
>> the
>> sky was better. I found him i
Thanks Jack. It's a super lens.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 10:12 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Terrific image! Impressive across the frame at 12mm (or 18mm @ 1:1).
>
> Jack
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm kind of liking this. But
Nice work. I am in accord with Russell.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
> i particulary like 1, 5 and 9, nice work
>
> russ
>
> On 3/5/07, Pedro Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> This time a smaller GESO (sorry for the last one, too big, I know).
>> Fi
Without the "t" I read this as a complement to Godders.. Few can match
wits with him, and he is a resource of inestimable value. I can't
imagine that it could be taken any other way. I too, am no Godfrey.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
> Boy, that missing "t" make a big
No, I didn't read it as a complement. I read it as a compliment. Sheesh!
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Without the "t" I read this as a complement to Godders.. Few can match
> wits with him, and he is a resource of inestimable value. I can't
I have a video head on my monopod. It provides plenty of tilt. Tilt is
necessary when shooting birds high in trees.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:16 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I have used monopods for many years without heads.
> since the thing only has one leg, its pretty easy
> to adjust it as n
Yes, most minilab processors are set up for srgb.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
> When I worked in a lab using a Fuji processor, adobe RGB gave me a
> terrible
> blue cast. Switching to sRGB fixed the problem. This was with the
> IstD
>
> Bill
>
> -Original Message---
I loaded a scanned 6x7 image just the other day. No problem.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:53 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> It seems that right now, scanned images don't work. I believe it is
> reading the exif data and not finding a pentax camera listed. I
> originally got one scanned image accepted be
Quite impressive. Love the colors here.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:47 AM, John Francis wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:16:52PM -0800, Bill Lawlor wrote:
>> I posted two photos from my trip to India during January at
>> www.photo.net/photos/wvl I used my new (aren't they all?) K10D and
>> F28/2
Beautiful color. They capture the spirit of the market.
Paul
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Bill Lawlor wrote:
>
>> I posted two photos from my trip to India during January at
>> www.photo.net/photos/wvl I used my new (aren't they all?) K10D and
>> F28/2.8
>> wide open in the night market.That S
.
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/prophoto-rgb.shtml shows
> quite
> a loss with sRGB but I'm a bit afraid of managing "inivisible" colors
> on my
> monitor
>
> greetings
> Markus
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAI
BTW, you might want to try a different browser. Some sites work better
with one browser or another.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Looking forward to further refinement of the program.
> All my images that were successfully entered are in "ready for review"
> status.
>
> J
Everything is real here:-). Although I did clone out a tree branch.
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Tom C wrote:
> Yeah it's kind of disorienting. But is the sky real or Photoshop? ;-)
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Good choice. Hope you're better soon. There's an Ansel Adams show at
the DIA until the end of March.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> After hobbling around for the last several months on a bum right knee,
> I
> finally had a complete new knew installed Monday morning. I
"Dutch" is my second language:-).
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Hate to tell you this Paul, but the horizon has a slight tilt to it.
>
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMA
put? Just darker or did colors change somehow too
> beside
> less brilliance?
> greetings
> Markus
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:52 PM
> To: Pentax-Disc
That would work, but I like the blue sky, fake or not. It's a bit
theatrical, but in my experience, that sells.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:40 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>> From:
>> Paul Stenquist
>> No. Second layer and some eraser work. I think I overdid the softe
Holy Shit! You're one tough customer. But we knew that. Good to hear
you're recovering. I wondered where you were during a recent flurry of
flame wars. Welcome back. I think you'll like the K10D.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
> You folks haven't heard from me for several mo
Good news. I look forward to meeting him.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Good news for those of you who know, or at least know of, Don Nelson,
> the Pentax-shooter who's the organizer of the Grandfather Mountain
> Nature Photography Weekend.
>
> I expect you'll recall his o
I'm taking up way too much bandwidth, but I'm very recently unemployed
(thank you Ford for going in the toilet) and have nothing else to do.
(More on that some other time.) Anyway, PESOs are better than silly
flame wars. Here's another one from the nature center. It's a male
house finch. I chea
Scored another nuthatch. This guy was in deep, dark doodoo and was
shot at 1/125th off the monopod. F8, ISO 800. Flash must have helped.
SR as well. Luck too. Again, the A 400/5.6 plus the A 2X-S converter.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5700119
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
w photo clients at least.
> A lovely bird but the background noise is too strong for me here but
> that
> should be fixable by denoising it.
> greetings
> Markus
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquis
k
> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I like it Paul. To my eye it is a little soft. I played with USM
>> and
>> thought that it improved with some addtional sharpening.
>>
>> The contrast of red and green is really nice.
>>
>> I used
t of purple fringing on that one.
>
> G
>
> On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> Scored another nuthatch. This guy was in deep, dark doodoo and was
>> shot at 1/125th off the monopod. F8, ISO 800. Flash must have helped.
>> SR as well. Luck too. Ag
Thanks for looking at both of these.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 9:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/9/2007 2:50:14 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm taking up way too much bandwidth, but I'm very recently unemployed
> (thank you Ford for going in the
I missed this shot previously. It is a very dramatic shot. Lovely. I
agree with Godfrey that much more shadow detail can be extracted. It
can all be done in PhotoShop as well. Much of the detail can be recoved
with highlights/shadows alone.
Some subsequent curve adjustments can restore balance.
Yes, I can generally shoot at 1/500th. This was a bit of an accident,
but the flash saved it. I'd love to have a 400/2.8, but there's no way
I can afford it.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Scored another nuthatch. This guy was in deep, dark doodoo and was
> shot at 1/
t really work.
>
> Boris
>
>
>
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Things are slow on the old list tonight. This might provide some
>> amusement. No danger of this young lady catching me catching her. This
>> is with the DA 50-200 BTW. I used to strap on the FA 50 when I moved
&g
me it would
> be a very practical lesson.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Boris
>
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> This is a rather large collection of photos taken on a half mile
>> stretch of suburban Detroit's Old Woodward Avenue. It will hopefully
>> end up as
Good exposure. I might p®efer the pic with more DOF, but that's hard to
achieve at macro distances.
Paul
On Mar 10, 2007, at 7:42 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
> Hi Pentaxians
> While flash results still are sometimes unpredictable with the AF280T
> (with
> an additional plastic on the reflector to r
Thanks Christian. Yes, it's a bit noisy. I'm usually stuck at ISO 800
with the 2X converter on that 5.6 lens. Here, I might have been able to
go to ISO 400. I had the shutter up to 1/800th. I'll keep trying.
Paul
On Mar 10, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Christian wrote:
> Paul Stenq
nery.
>
> Shel
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Paul Stenquist
>
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5696305&size=lg
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Good one. Love the old fellow's expression. Nicely rendered.
On Mar 10, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> I am still catching up a bit (w.r.t. to week count).
>
> This one is fresh out of the oven, so to say. Taken in one of our
> favorite restaurants in Tel Aviv.
>
> I am really growing
Excellent. Exposure well managed. Beautiful bird.
Paul
On Mar 10, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> Went back to the wetlands again yesterday. Not as many birds but this
> one
> was so intent on feeding he wasn't paying attention to us. I believe
> there
> is a small fish in its beak.
> K
301 - 400 of 23489 matches
Mail list logo
