If anyone wants to have a look ? Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9232531
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9232532
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Both interesting and quite dramatic
If anyone wants to have a look ? Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9232531
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9232532
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I agree. I found them interesting as well. But if you study the
gallery, you'll find very few pics of a newsworthy nature.
Paul
On May 23, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Bob W wrote:
Both interesting and quite dramatic
If anyone wants to have a look ? Joe
That doesn't surprise me. I never study the gallery though - I don't like
the user interface at all, and most of the pictures are rather predictable.
The exceptions tend to be by PDMLers.
Bob
I agree. I found them interesting as well. But if you study the
gallery, you'll find very few
- Original Message -
From: 27...@comcast.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:40 AM
Subject: Here's two that did not make into Pentax Gallery
If anyone wants to have a look ? Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9232531
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9232532
Joe,
The 2nd photo is pretty dramatic, well caught with fire and all.
The fireman and 'safety service' on the sign are good adds.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:40 AM, 27...@comcast.net wrote:
If anyone wants to have a look ? Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9232531
Hm. Those two photos are good photos Joe. So why did you submit them? :-)
Kind of serious. I have found one single photograph of disturbing
nature at PPG.
I'm not saying that the typical PPG photos are bad photos, not at all.
But they are IKEA poster pictures.
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/23 Bob W
wrote:
From: Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Accepted to the Pentax Gallery!
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 6:37 PM
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted
a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked
about it. I
Congrats, Nick... Very interesting photo.
LF
Nick Wright escreveu:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I cannot recall.
Big congrats, Nick. A very worthy photograph. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:37 PM
Subject: PESO: Accepted to the Pentax Gallery!
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo
Well done, Nick!
I remember voting for it. :-)
Jostein
2009/3/26 Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I
Nice shot. Well done.
I submitted 10 recently. I was quite chuffed that 1 made it in.
Cheers,
Dave
2009/3/26 Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I cannot recall.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:15 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice shot. Well done.
I submitted 10 recently. I was quite chuffed that 1 made it in.
Did you take the Nikon data out of the exif files.:-)
Dave
Cheers,
Dave
2009/3/26 Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com:
Hi
2009/3/27 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:15 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice shot. Well done.
I submitted 10 recently. I was quite chuffed that 1 made it in.
Did you take the Nikon data out of the exif files.:-)
Shhh...
:-)
These were the
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I cannot recall.
http://tinyurl.com/c5zbnh
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
--
PDML
Nice pic. Congratulations!
Paul
On Mar 25, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Nick Wright wrote:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I cannot recall.
On Mar 25, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Nick Wright wrote:
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I cannot recall.
http://tinyurl.com/c5zbnh
Don't recall seeing
Well done - great pic with an interesting intersection of geometric
shapes. Well deserving of recognition by the PPG.
Keep at it - persistence pays off!
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On Wed,
Congratulations Nick!
On Mar 25, 2009, at 18:37 , Nick Wright wrote:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I cannot recall.
It's FILM! Congratulations...I like it personally.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown
I don't recall having seen it, Nick. I'm not at all surprised it was accepted.
Very very nice!
Jack
--- On Wed, 3/25/09, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Accepted to the Pentax Gallery!
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday
In a message dated 3/25/2009 6:38:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
nickwright1...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
The nice folks at the Pentax Photo Gallery finally accepted a
photograph of mine for the gallery. I'm kinda stoked about it. I don't
believe I've shown this photo here before but I
likely, they simply didn't suit my eye at
the time I voted.
Jack
--- On Sat, 6/7/08, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pentax gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:54 PM
Maybe the bar isn't raised
: pentax gallery
Thanks. My main reason for posting this news is that I see lots of
new photos in pentax gallery. Maybe the bar isn't raised that high as
before (I stopped trying for a long time).
Toine
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Big congrats
of a number.
New people or policy..? More than likely, they simply didn't suit my eye at
the time I voted.
Jack
--- On Sat, 6/7/08, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pentax gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday
Yeah, I understand that is the opinion of others as well.
Jack
--- On Sun, 6/8/08, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pentax gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2008, 7:52 AM
That makes me curious
]
Subject: Re: pentax gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2008, 8:45 AM
My thought is that the gallery has enough in it now to allow
the
judges to be pickier. By that I mean, if they feel a
particular
photo has others in the gallery already then it might
and, due to the
number of offerings, must then compete against a stronger field.
Do you still have a number of re-submissions, Bruce?
Jack
--- On Sun, 6/8/08, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pentax gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Big congrats, Toine! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:29 AM
Subject: pentax gallery
I have submitted a few photos in the last weeks. To my surprise some
are accepted and if I watch the recent
Thanks. My main reason for posting this news is that I see lots of
new photos in pentax gallery. Maybe the bar isn't raised that high as
before (I stopped trying for a long time).
Toine
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big congrats, Toine! Cheers
Maybe the bar isn't raised that high as
before (I stopped trying for a long time).
I don't think so based on the stuff I see posted for voting.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pentax gallery
Thanks
Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pentax gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:54 PM
Maybe the bar isn't raised that high as
before (I stopped trying for a long time).
I don't think so based on the stuff I see posted for
voting.
Kenneth
I have submitted a few photos in the last weeks. To my surprise some
are accepted and if I watch the recent additions they accept loads of
new photos. And more surprising many from non pentax glass. It does
take several weeks before submitted changes to declined or accepted.
Toine
--
PDML
Toine,
When you use the term accepted, do you mean they have been accepted for
review or have been accepted/approved into the Pentax Gallery?
I agree it's taking quite a number of days to get a result from those which
have been accepted for review.
Congratulations on having work accepted
Yes what I meant is approved in gallery.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Toine,
When you use the term accepted, do you mean they have been accepted for
review or have been accepted/approved into the Pentax Gallery?
I agree it's taking quite a number
Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that the pictures are being shrunk down below the 600 pixel size that
is set for the gallery. Two issues for me:
1) picture is even smaller - makes it harder to evaluate
2) the sizing function can massacre the picture making it
I'm totally with you, Bruce.
I have posted here before on how the voting page is programmed, and
this change seems to be addressing one of my main criticisms; the
total size of the webpage.
Because of the way it is programmed, the page has to pre-load all the
full-gallery-size images at first
No, guess I hadn't. Will do so.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that the pictures are being shrunk down below the 600 pixel size that
is set for the gallery. Two issues for me:
1) picture is even smaller -
I just now decided to do some voting and noticed the changes you
mentioned.
Images do load more quickly by a nanosecond or so and I don't have a
personal problem with it.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that
I've got Flashblock installed on my Firefox so now I don't see any
thumbnail at all...
:-|
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed the big change in the voting mechanism. It seems
that the pictures are being shrunk down below the 600 pixel
Per Carolyn today:
If image only receives 0 - 29% positive votes out of 60 = Image auto
declined. IOW, 0 - 17 yes votes.
If image receives 30 - 100% positive votes out of 60 = Images is
reviewed by Pentax team. IOW, 18 - 60 yes votes.
The 60 vote criteria is the result of a recent raise fro 40.
Thanks for querying, Jack.
Btw, did you contact her via the webform or directly to her email
address? I've been trying to reach them lately by the webform and get
an error message back from the webserver.
Jostein
2008/3/5, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Per Carolyn today:
If image only
I used the Contact Us link on their Artist's Pages. Used it many times
and have always received a response.
Jack
--- AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for querying, Jack.
Btw, did you contact her via the webform or directly to her email
address? I've been trying to reach them lately
Thanks, I'll give it another go straight away. :-)
Jostein
2008/3/5, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I used the Contact Us link on their Artist's Pages. Used it many times
and have always received a response.
Jack
--- AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for querying, Jack.
Btw,
29% of 60 is a dam fine batting average.
Looks like Pentax is more of a hockey firm
LOL
Dave
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per Carolyn today:
If image only receives 0 - 29% positive votes out of 60 = Image auto
declined. IOW, 0 - 17 yes votes.
If
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I think I am ready to give up.
These two were finally declined after sitting there waiting for about
3 weeks - which means the final judges declined after peer approval.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/elephantseals_0003a.htm
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0739-07b.htm
Oh
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/johncelio
I should note, for those who aren't very familliar with the gallery, click
on the thumbnail ABOVE my artist photo (me holding a camera) to see the pic
that was accepted. I don't think it's possible for me to link directly to
the photo itself.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The second one probably should have made it. The lighthouse, on the
other hand, is a great shot but standard fare.
I agree.
I think the second one didn't make it because it's a pano (or at least
much wider than 2:3 aspect ratio). IIRC, they said at the beginning
they
There is one other thing about the standard fare shot that detracted,
but probably only for me. That is excessive building clutter. Just too
many structures.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The second one probably should have made it. The lighthouse, on
artists' log in, using your password. If you are just viewing
the images via the normal Pentax gallery URL, right clicking brings up the
Flash settings menu.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL
On Jan 25, 2008 8:16 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:01 AM 26/01/2008, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I think I am ready to give up.
These two were finally declined after sitting there waiting for about
3 weeks - which means the final judges declined after peer approval.
The bar is getting higher.
On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:25 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 8:16 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:01 AM 26/01/2008, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I think I am ready to give up.
These two were finally declined after sitting there waiting for
about
3
The second one probably should have made it. The lighthouse, on the
other hand, is a great shot but standard fare.
I gave up a long time ago. If it were my gallery I might want to
limit its size. Thus, maybe only something way over the top can make
it now.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:01 PM,
I'm surprised that Pigeon Point wasn't accepted. It's an exceptional
shot.
There have been pano shot on which I've voted no because that was
identified in the beginning as reason for them to be declined. I took
that as part of the voting instructions. There were some that were only
slightly pano
Bruce: I'm really sorry your photos didn't make it. They are winners, and I
would have bet they'd be accepted into the Pentax Gallery. Better luck next
time. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/johncelio
I finally got around to submitting three photos yesterday, though I've been
a member of the gallery since last summer. After hearing how sometimes the
Gallery folks take a long time to approve or deny photos, I was suprised
they got to me so
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:15:18 -0800
John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also a little surprised they picked the image they did. Any
thoughts on it?
Not what I have come to expect of them at all.
interesting shot but still ?
Bran
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I gave up last month.
Those are great shots BTW
Dave
On Jan 25, 2008 8:01 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I am ready to give up.
These two were finally declined after sitting there waiting for about
3 weeks - which means the final judges declined after peer approval.
I think I am ready to give up.
These two were finally declined after sitting there waiting for about
3 weeks - which means the final judges declined after peer approval.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/elephantseals_0003a.htm
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0739-07b.htm
Oh well.
--
Bruce
--
At 10:01 AM 26/01/2008, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I think I am ready to give up.
These two were finally declined after sitting there waiting for about
3 weeks - which means the final judges declined after peer approval.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/elephantseals_0003a.htm
I have officially given up on submissions.:-(
Dave
On Jan 10, 2008 12:34 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008 12:28 PM, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys are all so excited about this Pentax Gallery thing,
they must pay really well.
Better than what i'm
David J Brooks wrote:
I have only four on there and I';m trying to help, but they
don't like me.:-0
Yeah, I realized when I was responding to their question about the
screensaver that I haven't even submitted any since last spring or
summer. I guess I ought to go through what I've shot this
On Jan 10, 2008 8:53 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There, there.. I assure you it's nothing personal. :-(
Thanks, that, helps, a, bit.,
Dave
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 11:00 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should keep those
There, there.. I assure you it's nothing personal. [-(
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 11:00 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should keep those three images mighty busy 'til you give them
some
help. ;-))
I have only four on there and I';m trying
You guys are all so excited about this Pentax Gallery thing,
they must pay really well.
Graywolf (Tom Rittenhouse)
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
---
Paul Stenquist wrote
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Jack
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Beat me to it Jack. I was just about to post something.
Not yet, but thinking.
Dave
On Jan 9, 2008 3:21 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Jack
Wed Jan 9 15:28:31 EST 2008
David J Brooks wrote:
Beat me to it Jack. I was just about to post something.
Mark!
PDML rule of thumb (I should probably call it Rule of quick thumb):
If you have important news to post FYI, if you wait long enough,
somebody else would post it to PDML.
The sample looked like a slide show.
Dave
On Jan 9, 2008 4:01 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am curious as to how/where it would be seen.(?)
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beat me to it Jack. I was just about to post something.
Not yet, but thinking.
Am curious as to how/where it would be seen.(?)
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beat me to it Jack. I was just about to post something.
Not yet, but thinking.
Dave
On Jan 9, 2008 3:21 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery
me too.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, January 9, 2008, 1:23:06 PM, you wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
KW Yep.
KW Kenneth Waller
KW http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
KW - Original Message -
KW From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KW Subject: Pentax
Yeah..me too.
Jack
--- Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Yep.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax Gallery Screensaver.
Anyone
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Yep.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax Gallery Screensaver.
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Jack
--
PDML Pentax
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax Gallery Screensaver.
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Nope.
I don't use screen savers.
Cheers,
Dave
On Jan 10, 2008 5:21 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I did. I figure it's good exposure if nothing else. Photos are meant to be seen.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Jack
I received an email several weeks ago advising me of their intention to
produce a Pentax Gallery Screensaver was asked if I'd let them use some of
my images in the intro. I believe I saw 3 of my images in the Screensaver
intro I saw last night - which no longer appears on my Pentax Photo
I seem to have missed the part where they show how to download the damned
thing...
CW
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Screensaver.
Nope.
I
Me neither, but I'm not certain that Pentax might not have a site plan
for them.(?) I've asked Carolyn, but that was just earlier this PM and
I've received no response as yet.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope.
I don't use screen savers.
Cheers,
Dave
On Jan 10,
After I opted to Participate, I no longer found the introductory link
on my artists page.
Jack
--- Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received an email several weeks ago advising me of their intention
to
produce a Pentax Gallery Screensaver was asked if I'd let them use
some of
my
Just in. I got the response that it may be an online thing where it
randomly pulls down images from the net. I suppose that it is not
something like the old After Dark screen saver which you have to
install in your computer. Not that I use screen savers or stay online
to look at my desktop all
I haven't signed up...still waiting for Carolyn to answer as well how
it would work. Not that I use screen savers as well, but it does
throw my imagination into a loop considering that it says that our
photo cannot be downloaded from it.
Bong
On Jan 10, 2008 7:40 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL
Update:
Yep.
Cheers,
Dave (But I still don't use screen savers.)
At 08:26 AM 10/01/2008, David Savage wrote:
Nope.
I don't use screen savers.
Cheers,
Dave
On Jan 10, 2008 5:21 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
Jack
Jack Davis wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
I did, but it's only three photos they've accepted, anyway. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
It should keep those three images mighty busy 'til you give them some
help. ;-))
Jack
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Anyone opted in on the Pentax Photo Gallery Screensaver?
I did, but it's only three photos they've accepted, anyway. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF
Kenneth Waller wrote:
The large-aperture and longer focal lenght tele-lenses
are very modestly represented by comparison.
Ya think cost may have some bearing on this ?
Of course. And that's the whole point, isn't it? While the large
dinosaurs (ie. out of production...) are excellent tools, the
On Dec 27, 2007 6:43 PM, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
I'm fragile, photo wise.:-)
The briefest of looks at the gallery and those which have been shown here,
yet rejected, make you wonder if there is a PDML grudge. Anyway, it's the
end of the year nearly and
David J Brooks wrote:
I just had another rejected the other day.
Its obvious what i think are my best photos, are not everyone
else's.:-)
I'v pretty much given up on sending anything else in.
I'm fragile, photo wise.:-)
The briefest of looks at the gallery and those which have been
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I noticed a shift away from nature and landscape in recently accepted
images after our conversation here. I wouldn't be surprised if
someone from Pentax Gallery reads the list. Immediately following our
conversation I submitted a pic of Grace blowing bubbles that had
On Dec 27, 2007 4:52 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 27, 2007 6:43 PM, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
I'm fragile, photo wise.:-)
The briefest of looks at the gallery and those which have been shown here,
yet rejected, make you wonder if
On Dec 27, 2007 4:52 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no conspiracy against the PDML.
Just Dave.
There is clearly a conspiracy against PDML Canadians.
cheers,
frank
;-)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
for the Pentax Gallery
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I noticed a shift away from nature and landscape in recently accepted
images after our conversation here. I wouldn't be surprised if
someone from Pentax Gallery reads the list. Immediately following our
conversation I submitted a pic of Grace blowing
/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Recently Accepted for the Pentax Gallery
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I noticed a shift away from nature and landscape in recently
accepted
images after our conversation here. I wouldn't be surprised
Per our earlier speculations as to possible Pentax Gallery theme
preferences, I just took a glance at their Recently Accepted images.
While my 'review' was fairly casual, it appears, at least to me, not to
be blatantly weighted to any particular theme.
Jack
as to possible Pentax Gallery theme
preferences, I just took a glance at their Recently Accepted images.
While my 'review' was fairly casual, it appears, at least to me, not to
be blatantly weighted to any particular theme.
Jack
I noticed a shift away from nature and landscape in recently accepted
images after our conversation here. I wouldn't be surprised if
someone from Pentax Gallery reads the list. Immediately following our
conversation I submitted a pic of Grace blowing bubbles that had
previously been
On Dec 14, 2007 5:35 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather
surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid with lollipop
was declined without even making it to the judges. I would have
thought it would have made it
frank theriault wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 5:35 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather
surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid with lollipop
was declined without even making it to the judges. I would have
thought
On Dec 19, 2007 10:22 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind that most of the peer judging is apparently done by
Jostein. ;-)
One can't know what to expect from peer judging when one is peerless...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
101 - 200 of 903 matches
Mail list logo
