really figure out.
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af P.
J. Alling
Sendt: 31. august 2006 19:38
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: K10D Facts
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Jens Bladt wrote:
The X is hopefully for Flash. A much missed feature since the PZ-1p.
The speed may by accident be set wrong on my D, since I alway use M mode
for flash photography - in combination with TTL or studio flash (flash
meter).
What kind of wrong? Slower than
If you do not use a dedicated flash, the camera won't go to X-sync
speed automaticaly and you might select a speed higher than x-sync
speed.
In that case a X setting is useful: you know you use fastest flash
speed possible and only that speed.
2006/9/2, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Thibouille wrote:
If you do not use a dedicated flash, the camera won't go to X-sync
speed automaticaly and you might select a speed higher than x-sync
speed.
On the MZ-S you can select higher than X but it either doesn't fire it
or it stays at the top speed (can't
Hi,
Found this link at dpreview:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?act=Attachtype=postid=5887
- arne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Tainter
Sent: 1. september 2006 05:42
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts
On 1/9/06, Lie Arne, discombobulated, unleashed:
Found this link at dpreview:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?act=Attachtype=postid=5887
That's about right.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 01/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel,
Stars are very similar to a hot pixel. Very difficult to differentiate.
Unless the camera can tell the difference between an open and closed
shutter of course!
That's where your per-pixel gain
Actually, after thinking about this for a while longer, it occurred to
me that per-pixel gain and offset may be all there is to it. [ ... ]
Being able to sense and apply per-pixel gain will lead to a normalized
output per pixel but it still can't negate thermal and other random
noise
http://www.photozone.de
Don't know if I can link to the exact topic but it isnt hard to find!
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joseph Tainter
Sent: 01 September 2006 04:42
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
For all neee sayers to SD cards in K10D:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06090101pretec8gbsdhc.asp
;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 01/09/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all neee sayers to SD cards in K10D:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06090101pretec8gbsdhc.asp
Man that ought to come with a built in GPS tracking, I'd hate to
literally lose 8GB of shots.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
With all that new dynamic range, that should be all of 10 shots?
;)
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For all neee sayers to SD cards in K10D:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06090101pretec8gbsdhc.asp
Man that ought to come with
My question is how long it will be before CS2 is able to convert RAW images
from the K10D.
Tom C.
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:00:23
On 01.09.2006, at 19:07 , Tom C wrote:
My question is how long it will be before CS2 is able to convert
RAW images
from the K10D.
If K10D will really have DNG as its native RAW format - then you can
open and edit K10D RAWs in CS2 and Lightroom RIGHT NOW :-)
Chhers,
Sylwek
--
PDML
List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:00:23 -0500
With all that new dynamic range, that should be all of 10 shots?
;)
rg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
mike wilson wrote:
Tom C wrote:
My question is how long it will be before CS2 is able to convert RAW images
from the K10D.
Photoshop CS2 will do it right now because the latest Pentax Photo Lab
software will generate Adobe DNG files for you (even if the camera
doesn't, as rumored, generate
.
:-)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
Tom C wrote:
My question is how long it will be before CS2 is able to convert RAW
images
from the K10D.
Tom C.
That'll be CS3, $800 Sir, ching! Thank you
Yes Camera Raw is what I meant.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:11:57 -0400
mike wilson wrote:
Tom C wrote:
My
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:11:41 +0100, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list of reasonably well established facts include:
10 Mpx
Anti-shake
Yes ... but I can't talk about it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list of reasonably well established facts include:
10 Mpx
lol
You must have got the coffee, then. Posting at half past one in the morning...
Cheers,
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes ... but I can't talk about it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies
I generally don't sleep much don't drink much coffee either, except
for an occasional cup of decaf.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
lol
You must have got the coffee, then. Posting at half past one in the
morning...
Cheers,
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of these are
apparently detailed in patents filed by Pentax. They also seem to be
HAR!
On Aug 31, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes ... but I can't talk about it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list
On 8/31/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of these are
apparently
On 31.08.2006, at 12:56 , Jostein Øksne wrote:
So while I cannot and will not blatantly disclose what I have been
told in confidence, I'm happy to serve as a chaos pilot and summarise
those things that are already well established in the public domain.
But I haven't read all the threads
At 07:36 PM 31/08/2006, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Check the 'ordered m K10 today'. Rob is dropping heavy hints (about
weather sealing, mainly), and someone called 'gerasimov' from Bulgaria
posted a credible list of features containing a 22 bit A/D coverter. That
could be Aaron's 67-ditching
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:34:22 +0200 schreef Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of
On 31.08.2006, at 13:36 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Over at digitalfotonetz.de someone has been prying around in his
K100's
mount, and found pre-drilled holes at the location of the former
powerzoom
contacts. As the DS and DL definately do not have this, assumption
is the
K10 will share
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I haven't read all the threads thoroughly over the last weeks (I
have had very prominent guests in my house, and they have of course
had the right of way.), so I'd be grateful for help in gathering the
bits.
I've already said I'm on a diet! 8-(((
On 8/31/06 7:49 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, space for powerzoom contacts was provided in K100D
prototype, but it seems it disappeared in production K100D...
People in Japan are reporting the same thing. They say the holes are sealed
but could be pried open, but
On 31/08/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hows the chin Rob?, feeling better? Yes!
Time for another uppercut.
I'm fine, some interesting information is surfacing though!
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:14:57 +0200 schreef Digital Image Studio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 31/08/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hows the chin Rob?, feeling better? Yes!
Time for another uppercut.
I'm fine, some interesting information is surfacing though!
:o)
Anyone care to make
On 31.08.2006, at 14:15 , K.Takeshita wrote:
I guess what's happening is that the mount component is shared
between K100D
and K10D but those two contacts are disabled for K100D.
Speculation (with
some wishful thinking) is that these are definitely for USM (which
is pretty
well
At 08:14 PM 31/08/2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 31/08/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hows the chin Rob?, feeling better? Yes!
Time for another uppercut.
I'm fine, some interesting information is surfacing though!
I've been out of the loop the last couple of days so
On 31.08.2006, at 14:31 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
:o)
Anyone care to make an educated guess to RAW speed buffer given that
JPEG is 3 fps 'streaming'?
Well, if K10D is going to be 2x better camera than original *istD,
then it should have the buffer for RAWs twice as big ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:15:42 +0200 schreef K.Takeshita
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06 7:49 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, space for powerzoom contacts was provided in K100D
prototype, but it seems it disappeared in production K100D...
snip
Speculation (with
On 31.08.2006, at 14:38 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
They won't. Sharing between K10 and K100 is a more logical
explanation.
And don't forget Pentax seems to be on a 6 month replacement cycle
with
the lower end bodies. Enabling USM on the K100 for PMA (K100s?
K200?) is
quite easy now...
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be interesting to have possibility of adapting K100D for USM
lenses ;-) But it is also possible that they planned to include USM
support in K100D and dropped it because it wasn't complete and they
wanted to
On 31.08.2006, at 14:54 , Pål Jensen wrote:
Maybe the contacts pop out the moment you mount an USM lens?
I don't think so. In the patent that I found a few years ago these
contacts were used to drive powerzoom lenses too. So if K10D would
support USM lenses we could expect it to support
Hey dude,
D'you fink your'e the only one?
Jostein :-(
On 8/31/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I haven't read all the threads thoroughly over the last weeks (I
have had very prominent guests in my house, and they have of course
had the
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:56:06 +0200 schreef Sylwester Pietrzyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 31.08.2006, at 14:38 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
They won't. Sharing between K10 and K100 is a more logical
explanation.
And don't forget Pentax seems to be on a 6 month replacement cycle
with
the lower end
On 8/31/06 9:14 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the patent that I found a few years ago these
contacts were used to drive powerzoom lenses too.
Those hidden contact (for K100D) are exactly where the PZ contacts used to
be.
Ken
P.S.
Sealing of these contacts are not
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the contacts pop out the moment you mount an USM lens?
Hm.
I think that would mean that all the old powerzoom lenses would be
unusable on the K10D. That seems unlikely, imo.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/31/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two wheels. Like the D.
Fact or speculation?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/31/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone care to make an educated guess to RAW speed buffer given that
JPEG is 3 fps 'streaming'?
So... 3fps is a fact?
Streaming JPEGs meaning no buffer congestion for JPEG? Fact or rumor?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 31/08/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.
Sealing of these contacts are not exactly the duct tape job, but I gathered
that they are plugged some type of resin or something.
May be it is a matter of removing those materials and upgrade the firmware?
I vote this post for
On 31.08.2006, at 15:12 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Of course the Dynax 9 was a pro camera (if I understood Minolta's
numbering scheme correctly), while the K100 is at the absolute low
end of
the DSLR market. Different customers, and different amounts of
customers...
I guess it would be
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:27:03 +0200 schreef Jostein Øksne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone care to make an educated guess to RAW speed buffer given that
JPEG is 3 fps 'streaming'?
So... 3fps is a fact?
Apologies: rumour from an unconfirmed
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:22:13 +0200 schreef Jostein Øksne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two wheels. Like the D.
Fact or speculation?
Fact. Check out the PMA and PIE photo's that have been online since last
febuary.
--
Regards, Lucas
--
PDML
On 8/31/06 9:23 AM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be it is a matter of removing those materials and upgrade the firmware?
I vote this post for prediction of the month, nice going Ken ;-)
Actually, the remark was with a bit of tongue-in-cheek which did not come
out so
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on the floaters from the previous thread, here's an update.
The wish from John Forbes for a two-wheel interface aka *istD and
On 31.08.2006, at 15:39 , Jostein Øksne wrote:
Facts:
10 Mpx
Anti-shake
Evolved K-mount
SD memory cards, with support for 2 GB cards.
Battery grip
HyperProgram (two wheels)
3 fps
Speculations:
Proprietary Li-Ion battery
The evolution of K-mount is for in-lens AF motors
Anti-dust
On 8/31/06 9:39 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then came all the observations of powerzoom contacts present in K100D.
Was the subject on the power zoom feature?
I thought people were talking about using these contacts for USM drive.
I thought PZ itself is a dead issue (can see no
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:39:17 +0200 schreef Jostein Øksne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Based on the floaters from the previous thread, here's an update.
The wish from John Forbes for a two-wheel interface aka *istD and
(P)Z-1p seems so likely I threw it into facts at face value. Rob's
battery grip
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Um... Don't ask my wife that question, please...
Meanwhile, the HyP got further support from Lucas with reference to
published images, so that's now an established fact, while the
On 8/31/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was the subject on the power zoom feature?
I thought people were talking about using these contacts for USM drive.
I thought PZ itself is a dead issue (can see no reason to resurrect it,
particularly if Pentax are planning to equip lenses with
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Um... Don't ask my wife that question, please...
Meanwhile, the HyP got further support from Lucas with reference to
I really do not want to stir the pot any further, but I just encountered a
post in Japan that reported that;
[He went to Pentax Forum (Sort of central service centre in Tokyo) to get
the sensor cleaned. He tried to steer people there into the discussion on
K10D, by telling that he was concerned
Chuck it.
Dave
On 8/31/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you think, should we keep the PowerZoom in the rumor pool,
or throw it out all together?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
More proof of HyP.
But there's new acronym on that dial too; Sv.
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't
On 8/31/06 10:04 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you think, should we keep the PowerZoom in the rumor pool,
or throw it out all together?
If you ask me, I would throw PZ rumour out ;-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 31.08.2006, at 16:10 , Digital Image Studio wrote:
An then there's the pic following found on the following thread:
http://www.converse.ru/img/460805808.jpg
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=19822373
Yes it's a Sumdung but check out the mode dial
Sv? Could it
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Um... Don't ask my wife that question, please...
Meanwhile,
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 01:09:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: K10D - facts and speculations
Hey dude,
D'you fink your'e the only one?
Jostein :-(
8-( indeed. Been out on my bicycle twice, leaving
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:17:42 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized,
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 01:56:06 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
On 8/31/06 9:39 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then came all the observations of powerzoom contacts present
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 02:21:54 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
On 8/31/06 10:04 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you think, should we keep the PowerZoom in the rumor
On 31.08.2006, at 16:21 , K.Takeshita wrote:
If you ask me, I would throw PZ rumour out ;-).
In KAF3 patent both lenses were usable - USM and Powerzoom ones. It
was easy to implement as both use the same, good, old PZ contacts for
power.
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi guys - been lurking and not managing to keep up with the list for
some time but starting to get K10D urges!
From Roland Mabo:
10.2Mp APS-C sized sensor
Hardware noise-killing processing (The K10D will have the lowest noise
at high ISO of all the 10Mp cameras, thank's to new noise-killing
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:05 +0200 schreef K.Takeshita
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I really do not want to stir the pot any further, but I just encountered
a
post in Japan that reported that;
[He went to Pentax Forum (Sort of central service centre in Tokyo) to get
the sensor cleaned. He tried
On 31.08.2006, at 16:34 , mike wilson wrote:
Not for USM drive directly but power for the USM motor. There
would have to be some sensor/logic coupling, also, to achieve
focus. So I would assume more contacts in the bayonet.
Mike, I think one digital contact in mount as used in F, FA and
This looks to be what Aaron and the other insiders saw. Thanks.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys - been lurking and not managing to keep up with the list for
some time but starting to get K10D urges!
From Roland Mabo:
Full metal body (Metal outside and inside, inspired by MZ-S
construction)
This is extremely unlikely and unthinkable at the rumored price.
BTW The whole list is just an assemblages of the rumors floating around
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 02:20:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
More proof of HyP.
But there's new acronym on that dial too; Sv.
And TAv?
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio
- Original Message -
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So my real vote is no USM capability for the K100D :-).
Many people might wish this be wrong and I have absolutely no foundation
in
predicting anything on this.
The problem I have with this is that it is at odds with Pentax
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Add to speculations weather proof body - it was mentioned here
several times in the past.
And I don't know how the rest, but I feel that such a complete DSLR
could be the most innovative and revolutionary Pentax since LX ;-)
And then, when everything (being it true
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of these are
apparently detailed in patents filed by Pentax. They also seem
mike wilson wrote:
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 01:56:06 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
On 8/31/06 9:39 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then came all the observations of powerzoom
On 01/09/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably. The K10 proto has it in red, like on older Pentax camera's. K10
does not have TAv and Sv, by the way.
Really? ;-)
What about raised text like the LX SS dial?
Interestingly, there is a lot of space left on the K10 dial.
Not
Over at digitalfotonetz.de someone has been prying around in his
K100's
mount, and found pre-drilled holes at the location of the former
powerzoom
contacts. As the DS and DL definately do not have this, assumption
is the
K10 will share the mirrorbox with the 100, and will have USM
BTW The whole list is just an assemblages of the rumors floating around
That's given. Look at the name of the thread.
Some rumors seem more substantiated than others, though.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 01/09/06, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. This has been discussed to great length before, but unless they
have done something radical in other stages, the sensor itself doesn't
have a dynamic range anywhere near the one associated with a 22-bit A/D
converter, so why would they
On 01/09/06, Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3 fps JPEG streaming (The hardware noise-killing technology slows down
the image processing so it isn't possible with more than 3 fps, but in
future versions of this technology they may be able to speed it up to
allow for faster frames per
On 31.08.2006, at 17:02 , Cotty wrote:
So let me get this right. If USM or it's Pentax-monikered
equivalent is
introduced, anyone that wants to take advantage of it is going to have
to buy new lens(es) ?
Exactly. One must have lenses with built-in USM motor for USM to
work :-) But I
On Aug 31, 2006, at 10:02, Cotty wrote:
So let me get this right. If USM or it's Pentax-monikered
equivalent is
introduced, anyone that wants to take advantage of it is going to have
to buy new lens(es) ?
Well, if my 50mm f1.7 A lens doesn't automatically get USM
capability then I'm
On 8/31/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there's new acronym on that dial too; Sv.
And TAv?
Sv: Sensitivity priority. Set the ISO, the camera selects T and A.
TAv: T and A priority. Set both T and A, the camera selects the ISO
for correct exposure. If I were to implement this I'd
Isn't that the case with any new technology. However, one's old lenses will
still work as well as they did previously. And most of us, sooner or later,
purchase some new lenses. It's a worthwhile feature.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the 'ordered m K10 today'. Rob is dropping heavy hints (about
weather sealing, mainly), and someone called 'gerasimov' from Bulgaria
posted a credible list of features containing a 22 bit A/D coverter. That
could be Aaron's 67-ditching feature...
Hmmm.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Exactly. One must have lenses with built-in USM motor for USM to
work :-) But I guess new mount would be back compatible, so older
lenses would work the way they usually did ;-)
Would the opposite also be correct? Would USM lenses work as AF
) as a backup body.
Rob Brigham
Badger Software Ltd
www.badger.co.uk
0118 9464488
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sylwester Pietrzyk
Sent: 31 August 2006 16:28
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D - facts and speculations
On 31.08.2006, at 17:46 , Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Would the opposite also be correct? Would USM lenses work as AF lenses
on screw-driver bodies?
I would rather say no as it doesn't make sns economically, but one
never knows...
Would they even work as MF lenses?
It is very possible.
Anything else?
Jostein
-
Jostein, you are one of the ones who knows!
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I thought people were talking about using these contacts for USM drive.
I thought PZ itself is a dead issue (can see no reason to resurrect it,
particularly if Pentax are planning to equip lenses with USM), but the
concept of driving something in a lens (instead of PZ) is a logical one when
we
http://www.converse.ru/img/460805808.jpg
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=19822373
Yes it's a Sumdung but check out the mode dial
-
Which is why I think we will get ISO set and other useful things in the
menu.
And check out how the lens is mounted. Do you trust
On 31.08.2006, at 17:50 , Rob Brigham wrote:
The bigger question I guess would be whether these new USM lenses also
have the mechanical linkages to work on older bodies? I have a strong
suspicion that they will not, but would love to be wrong... If not
then
it is less useful to have an
Hmmm. This has been discussed to great length before, but unless they
have done something radical in other stages, the sensor itself doesn't
have a dynamic range anywhere near the one associated with a 22-bit A/D
converter, so why would they do that?
The likey ADC/pre-processor has a
Den 31. aug. 2006 kl. 17.52 skrev Joseph Tainter:
Anything else?
Jostein
-
Jostein, you are one of the ones who knows!
Joe
I think he is trying to forget that .-)
DagT
http://dag.foto.no
Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side.
--
PDML
Den 31. aug. 2006 kl. 16.39 skrev Rob Brigham:
...
From Roland Mabo:
...
Oh, and a link to Pentax dust removal patent:
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOCIDX=JP2005354330F=0
Oh, please. Roland and some others are always referring to
unidentified patents, but I hope this is not
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:56:06AM -0400, K.Takeshita wrote:
On 8/31/06 9:39 AM, Jostein ?ksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then came all the observations of powerzoom contacts present in K100D.
Was the subject on the power zoom feature?
I thought people were talking about using these
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
