* p...@cpan.org [2019-01-17T06:25:04]
> I'm really disappointed as you have not wrote anything about this topic
> as people are already there...
I'm not dead.
I am avoiding this list because I find your messages and attitude about it to
be really off-putting, and whenever I come back, I feel like
On Thursday 17 January 2019 12:25:04 p...@cpan.org wrote:
> Hi Ricardo!
>
> On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> > So: you can wait for me to have more time, or people with some vested
> > interest can agree to step up to do more in general.
>
> I'm really disappointed as you
Hi Ricardo!
On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> So: you can wait for me to have more time, or people with some vested
> interest can agree to step up to do more in general.
I'm really disappointed as you have not wrote anything about this topic
as people are already there...
On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32]
> > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that
> > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so.
>
> You are mistaken.
>
> The answer is the same as every other time you have a
On Thursday 09 August 2018 15:34:27 p...@cpan.org wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2018 13:03:58 p...@cpan.org wrote:
> > On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> > > * p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32]
> > > > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that
> > > > m
On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> If we had three or four people who committed to create a better sense of group
> responsibility, maybe we'd see more progress.
...
> So: you can wait for me to have more time, or people with some vested
> interest can agree to step up to do m
On Thursday 28 June 2018 13:03:58 p...@cpan.org wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> > * p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32]
> > > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that
> > > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so.
> >
> > You are m
On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32]
> > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that
> > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so.
>
> You are mistaken.
>
> The answer is the same as every other time you have a
Marc Bradshaw via pep said
(on Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 07:35:31p.m. +1000):
>
> > PS: Is somebody still active on this pep mailing list?
>
> Not active, but reading.
+1 and can PR, etc
--
Gedge
* p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32]
> So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that
> modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so.
You are mistaken.
The answer is the same as every other time you have asked: I am here, I am
alive, I am interested, and I am extremely bu
> PS: Is somebody still active on this pep mailing list?
Not active, but reading.
--
Marc Bradshaw
marcbradshaw.net[1] | @marcbradshaw[2]
Links:
1. http://marcbradshaw.net/
2. https://twitter.com/marcbradshaw
p...@cpan.org wrote:
> PS: Is somebody still active on this pep mailing list?
Mainly just a user, here. I won't ever use proprietary
messaging platforms, but I can help out if stuff comes up on
this list.
Hi,
The state of these modules differs, since they are not all maintained by
the same person. For example, I only maintain Email::Outlook::Message.
Of course, since that module depends on Email::MIME, my module is also
affected by any lack of maintenance thereof. There are procedures in
place for
Hi! I would like to ask: What is the state of the perl Email::* modules?
Currently there are lot of open pull request without review, some of
there more then year. Who is the maintainer or supporter of Email::*
modules? Currently, rjbs as primary person does not respond to emails.
For Email::MIME
14 matches
Mail list logo
