On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 08:44 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
On 3 December 2013 02:02, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
ISTM that the real solution to this particular problem is to decouple
the extensions that are currently in contrib from
On 3 December 2013 23:37, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thinking some more about bug #8648, it occurred to me that ruleutils.c
isn't exactly prepared for the case either:
regression=# create table nocols();
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create view vv1 as select exists (select * from
I've cleaned this up - revision attached - and marked it ready for
committer.
Thank you for this.
I did the basic hygiene test. The patch applies correctly and compiles
with no warnings. Did not find anything broken in basic functionality.
In the documentation i have a minor suggestion of
Hello, this is cont'd comments.
0008 and after to come later..
I had nothing to comment for patch 0008.
= 0009:
- In repl_scanner.l, you omitted double-doublequote handling for
replication but it should be implemented. Zero-length
identifier check might be needed depending on the
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 15:44 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
How are we going to handle new keywords
being added in new major versions? A pg_dump of the extension template
script is then going to be loaded into the new major version but will
not actually be able to be run because it'll error
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
In more normal cases, however, the system can (and probably should)
figure out what was intended by choosing the *shortest* path to get to
the intended version. For example, if someone ships 1.0, 1.0--1.1,
1.1, and 1.1--1.2, the system
On 12/04/2013 01:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Would certainly be nice. Realistically, getting good automated
performace tests will require paying someone like Greg S., Mark or me
for 6
On 2013-12-04 17:31:50 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
= 0009:
- In repl_scanner.l, you omitted double-doublequote handling for
replication but it should be implemented. Zero-length
identifier check might be needed depending on the upper-layer.
I am not sure what you mean here.
On 2 December 2013 04:55, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
it looks well, thank you
Regards
Pavel
I've been thinking about this some more, and there's another case that
concerns me slightly. We're now making some of the DROP...IF EXISTS
commands tolerate non-existent
On 2013-12-04 11:13:58 +0900, KONDO Mitsumasa wrote:
4) Start the slave and connect to it using psql and in another session I can
see
all archive recovery log
Hmm... I had thought my mistake in reading your email, but it reproduce again.
When I sat small recovery_time_delay(=3), it might
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 11/19/13, 11:30 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
+1 from me.
That's +1 for *not* including this?
Right.
I agree with not including this.
If you're looking for more of those, here's another +1 for not including
Hi,
On 04/12/13 11:13, KONDO Mitsumasa wrote:
1) Clusters
- build master
- build slave and attach to the master using SR and config
recovery_time_delay to
1min.
2) Stop de Slave
3) Run some transactions on the master using pgbench to generate a lot of
archives
4) Start the slave
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sergey Muraviov
sergey.k.murav...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for this trick.
It would be nice if this trick was documented.
However, with the pager I can't see wide value on one screen, select and
copy it entirely.
And I have to press many keys to find the
From: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
I think the reason why it was coded like that was that we hadn't written
postmaster_is_alive() yet, or maybe we had but didn't want to trust it.
However, with the coding you have here, we're fully exposed to any failure
modes postmaster_is_alive() may have; so
From: MauMau maumau...@gmail.com
In addition, I'll remove libpq.dll from lib folder unless somebody
objects.
Currently, libpq.dll is placed in both bin and lib. I guess libpq.dll was
left in lib because it was considered necessary for ECPG DLLs.
The attached patch also removes libpq.dll from
I think all of this data cannot fit in shared_buffers, you might want
to increase shared_buffers
to larger size (not 30GB but close to your data size) to see how it
behaves.
When I use shared_buffers larger than my data size such as 10 GB, results
scale nearly as expected at least for this
Hello,
I've found a bug that psql's \conninfo displays incorrect information on
Windows. Please find attached the patch and commit this.
[Problem]
When I run psql postgres on Windows and execute \conninfo, it outputs the
text below. It reports that psql connected to the server via UNIX
Maybe you could help test this patch:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20131115194725.gg5...@awork2.anarazel.de
Which repository should I apply these patches. I tried main repository, 9.3
stable and source code of 9.3.1, and in my trials at least of one the
patches is failed. What patch
Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com writes:
On 3 December 2013 23:37, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thinking some more about bug #8648, it occurred to me that ruleutils.c
isn't exactly prepared for the case either:
... So I'm leaning towards just doing
+ if (colno ==
2013/12/4 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
On 2013-12-04 11:13:58 +0900, KONDO Mitsumasa wrote:
4) Start the slave and connect to it using psql and in another session
I can see
all archive recovery log
Hmm... I had thought my mistake in reading your email, but it reproduce
again.
On 2013-12-04 22:47:47 +0900, Mitsumasa KONDO wrote:
2013/12/4 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
When it happened, psql cannot connect standby server at all. I think this
behavior is not good.
It should only delay recovery position and can seen old delay table data.
That doesn't sound like
Tom Lane escribió:
What I'm thinking about this today is that really the *right* solution
is to allow syntactically-empty SELECT lists; once we've bought into the
notion of zero-column tables, the notion that you can't have an empty
select list is just fundamentally at odds with that. And
2013/12/4 Christian Kruse christ...@2ndquadrant.com
You created a master node and a hot standby with 300 delay. Then
you stopped the standby, did the pgbench and startet the hot standby
again. It did not get in line with the master. Is this correct?
No. First, I start master, and execute
Hi,
On 2013-12-03 19:33:16 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
- compute recoveryUntilDelayTime in XLOG_XACT_COMMIT and
XLOG_XACT_COMMIT_COMPACT checks
Why just those? Why not aborts and restore points also?
What would the advantage of waiting on anything but commits be? If it's
not a commit, the
2013/12/4 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
On 2013-12-04 22:47:47 +0900, Mitsumasa KONDO wrote:
2013/12/4 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
When it happened, psql cannot connect standby server at all. I think this
behavior is not good.
It should only delay recovery position and
Sameer Kumar wrote:
CreateTrigStmt is passed to CreateTrigger function as an arguement. I am
struggling to understand how the values for various members of trigger are
set and where [which file] calls CreateTrigStmt.
Can someone provide some help on this?
I think you need better tools
Hello,
I've found a bug and would like to fix it, but I cannot figure out how to do
that well. Could you give me any advice? I encountered this on PG 9.2, but
it will probably exist in later versions.
[Problem]
On Windows, a user with Administrator privileges can start the database
* Jeff Davis (pg...@j-davis.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 14:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
When it comes to dump/reload, I'd much rather see a mechanism which uses
our deep understanding of the extension's objects (as database objects)
to
2013/11/8 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at writes:
What I would like to do is add a custom resjunk column
(e.g. a bytea) in AddForeignUpdateTargets that carries a row identifier
from the scan state to the modify state.
Would that be possible? Can I have
Hello
postgres=# \pset format wrapped
Output format (format) is wrapped.
postgres=# select 'afadsafasd fasdf asdfasd fsad fas df sadf sad f sadf
sadf sa df sadfsadfasd fsad fsa df sadf asd fa sfd sadfsadf asdf sad f sadf
sad fadsf';
?column?
* Jeff Davis (pg...@j-davis.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 15:44 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
How are we going to handle new keywords
being added in new major versions? A pg_dump of the extension template
script is then going to be loaded into the new major version but will
not
2013/12/4 Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com
On 2 December 2013 04:55, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
it looks well, thank you
Regards
Pavel
I've been thinking about this some more, and there's another case that
concerns me slightly. We're now making
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:51:47PM -0700, Christoph Berg wrote:
make check supports EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS to pass extra options to
pg_regress, but all the other places where pg_regress is used do not
allow this. The attached patch adds EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS to
Makefile.global.in (for contrib
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I proposed this patch previously and I still think it's a
good idea, but it got voted down on the grounds that it didn't
deal with clock drift. I view that as insufficient reason to
reject the feature, but others disagreed. Unless some of those
Hanada-san,
Thanks for your reviewing,
2013/12/4 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com:
I first reviewed postgres_fdw portion of the patches to learn the
outline of Custom Plan. Wiki page is also a good textbook of the
feature. I have some random comments about the basic design of Custom
Thanks for fixing many my carelessness.
I didn't know seek was an irregular verb...
Best regards,
2013/12/4 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com:
2013/11/29 Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp:
I merged all the propositions from Jim. Thanks, it made the documentation
quality better. Also, I
Hi,
On 04/12/13 07:22, Kevin Grittner wrote:
There are many things that a system admin can get wrong. Failing
to supply this feature because the sysadmin might not be running
ntpd (or equivalent) correctly seems to me to be like not having
the software do fsync because the sysadmin might not
On 12/4/13, 2:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
running a
few kvm instances that get bootstrapped automatically is something that
is a solved problem.
Is it sound to run performance tests on kvm?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:44:15 -0800
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
It seems clear that Kernel.org, since 2.6, has been in the business of
pushing major, hackish, changes to the IO stack without testing them or
even thinking too hard about what the side-effects might be. This is
perhaps
On 12/04/2013 04:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 12/4/13, 2:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
running a
few kvm instances that get bootstrapped automatically is something that
is a solved problem.
Is it sound to run performance tests on kvm?
as sounds as on any other platform imho, the
On 12/4/13, 1:42 AM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
IMHO, a data structure like the above would be completely
self-contained and allow any autoconfiguring tool or GUI tool to be
easily created, if the syntax is programmable. It would certainly make
the config file more verbose, but at the
On 11/23/13, 7:12 AM, Mario Weilguni wrote:
Well, in that case and since this is a rarely used extension (I guess
so), maybe it would be the best to simply rename that extension to
uuidossp (or whatever) and don't make any special treatment for it?
Why? This is a solved problem, and renaming
Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
2013/11/8 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
[ thinks for awhile... ] Hm. In principle you can put any expression
you want into the tlist during AddForeignUpdateTargets. However, if it's
not a Var then the planner won't understand that it's something that needs
to be
On 04/12/13 16:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 12/4/13, 1:42 AM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
IMHO, a data structure like the above would be completely
self-contained and allow any autoconfiguring tool or GUI tool to be
easily created, if the syntax is programmable. It would certainly
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Tom Dunstan pg...@tomd.cc wrote:
On 4 December 2013 01:24, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, more or less, but the key is ensuring that it wouldn't let you
create the constraint in the first place if the partial index
specified *didn't* match the
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Metin Doslu me...@citusdata.com wrote:
Here are the results of vmstat 1 while running 8 parallel TPC-H Simple
(#6) queries: Although there is no need for I/O, wa fluctuates between 0
and 1.
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
On 2013-12-04 14:27:10 -0200, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Metin Doslu me...@citusdata.com wrote:
Here are the results of vmstat 1 while running 8 parallel TPC-H Simple
(#6) queries: Although there is no need for I/O, wa fluctuates between 0
and 1.
procs
Notice the huge %sy
What kind of VM are you using? HVM or paravirtual?
This instance is paravirtual.
I'd strongly suggest doing a perf record -g -a wait a bit, ctrl-c;
perf report run to check what's eating up the time.
Here is one example:
+ 38.87% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] hypercall_page
+ 9.32% postgres [kernel.kallsyms] [k] hypercall_page
+ 6.80% postgres
On 12/04/2013 11:25 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Tom Dunstan pg...@tomd.cc wrote:
On 4 December 2013 01:24, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, more or less, but the key is ensuring that it wouldn't let you
create the constraint in the first place if the
On 2013-12-04 18:43:35 +0200, Metin Doslu wrote:
I'd strongly suggest doing a perf record -g -a wait a bit, ctrl-c;
perf report run to check what's eating up the time.
Here is one example:
+ 38.87% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] hypercall_page
+ 9.32% postgres [kernel.kallsyms]
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Oh. I misinterpreted what this feature was about, then. I thought it
was about restricting the reference to a subset of the *referenced*
table, but it seems to be about restricting the constraint to a subset
of the
src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c:5889: trailing whitespace.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 12/04/2013 12:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Oh. I misinterpreted what this feature was about, then. I thought it
was about restricting the reference to a subset of the *referenced*
table, but it seems to be about
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maybe we should just bite the bullet and change the WAL format for
heap_freeze (inventing an all-new record
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 09:50 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
I still don't see that Extension Templates are all bad:
* They preserve the fact that two instances of the same extension
(e.g. in different databases) were created from the same template.
This is only true if we change the
On 12/04/2013 04:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:44:15 -0800
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
It seems clear that Kernel.org, since 2.6, has been in the business of
pushing major, hackish, changes to the IO stack without testing them or
even thinking too hard about
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 14:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
When it comes to dump/reload, I'd much rather see a mechanism which uses
our deep understanding of the extension's objects (as database objects)
to implement the dump/reload than a text blob which is
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Interestingly, the variant for which you can't think of a use case is
the one I've missed most. Typical examples in my experience are
things like project.project_manager_id references person (id) where
CreateTrigStmt is passed to CreateTrigger function as an arguement. I am
struggling to understand how the values for various members of trigger
are
set and where [which file] calls CreateTrigStmt.
Can someone provide some help on this?
I think you need better tools to guide you
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-12-04 18:43:35 +0200, Metin Doslu wrote:
I'd strongly suggest doing a perf record -g -a wait a bit, ctrl-c;
perf report run to check what's eating up the time.
Here is one example:
+ 38.87% swapper
You could try HVM. I've noticed it fare better under heavy CPU load,
and it's not fully-HVM (it still uses paravirtualized network and
I/O).
I already tried with HVM (cc2.8xlarge instance on Amazon EC2) and observed
same problem.
On 2013-12-04 16:00:40 -0200, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
All that time is spent in your virtualization solution. One thing to try
is to look on the host system, sometimes profiles there can be more
meaningful.
You
Didn't follow the thread from the start. So, this is EC2? Have you
checked, with a recent enough version of top or whatever, how much time
is reported as stolen?
Yes, this EC2. stolen is randomly reported as 1, mostly as 0.
Here are some extra information:
- When we increased NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS to 1024, this problem is
disappeared for 8 core machines and come back with 16 core machines on
Amazon EC2. Would it be related with PostgreSQL locking mechanism?
- I tried this test with 4 core machines including my
On 2013-12-04 20:19:55 +0200, Metin Doslu wrote:
- When we increased NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS to 1024, this problem is
disappeared for 8 core machines and come back with 16 core machines on
Amazon EC2. Would it be related with PostgreSQL locking mechanism?
You could try my lwlock-scalability
You could try my lwlock-scalability improvement patches - for some
workloads here, the improvements have been rather noticeable. Which
version are you testing?
I'm testing with PostgreSQL 9.3.1.
On 12/04/2013 07:32 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
On 12/04/2013 04:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 12/4/13, 2:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
running a
few kvm instances that get bootstrapped automatically is something that
is a solved problem.
Is it sound to run performance tests
On 12/04/2013 07:30 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 12/04/2013 07:32 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
On 12/04/2013 04:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 12/4/13, 2:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
running a
few kvm instances that get bootstrapped automatically is something that
is a solved
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:26 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:15:36AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 11/28/2013 03:24 AM, David Fetter wrote:
WITH, or SRF, or whatever, the point is that we need to be able to
specify what we're sending--probably single
On 12/4/13, 11:22 AM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
Would it be well-received a new file format that keeps it simple for
both hand editing and generation of the configuration, and at the same
time offers the features I have mentioned?
I don't see how that would work exactly: You want to add
On 04/12/13 19:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 12/4/13, 11:22 AM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
Would it be well-received a new file format that keeps it simple for
both hand editing and generation of the configuration, and at the same
time offers the features I have mentioned?
I don't see
On 12/04/2013 07:33 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Wow, Josh, I'm surprised to hear this from you.
Well, I figured it was too angry to propose for an LWN article. ;-)
The active/inactive list mechanism works great for the vast majority of
users. The second-use algorithm prevents a lot of
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom Well, okay, but you've not said anything that wouldn't be
Tom handled just as well by some logic that adds a fixed
Tom integer-constant-zero flag column to the rows going into the
Tom tuplesort.
Adding such a column unconditionally even for
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:43:44PM -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:26 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:15:36AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 11/28/2013 03:24 AM, David Fetter wrote:
WITH, or SRF, or whatever, the point is that we
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Well I guess we could say something like:
FOREIGN KEY (a-col) WHERE (a-condition) REFERENCES b(b-col) WHERE
(b-condition)
But it's somewhat ugly.
OK, those make sense. I wonder whether this should be done via a USING
clause on the constraint
On 12/04/2013 07:33 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Wow, Josh, I'm surprised to hear this from you.
The active/inactive list mechanism works great for the vast majority of
users. The second-use algorithm prevents a lot of pathological behavior,
like wiping out your entire cache by copying a big
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I assume what would happen is the slave would PANIC upon seeing a WAL
record code it didn't recognize.
I wonder if we should for the future have the START_REPLICATION command (or
Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 14:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
When it comes to dump/reload, I'd much rather see a mechanism which uses
our deep understanding of the extension's objects (as database objects)
to implement the
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
The idea here is that such a happy situation will not obtain until
much later, if ever, and meanwhile, we need a way to get things
accomplished even if it's inelegant, inefficient, etc. The
alternative is that those things simply will not get accomplished
On 12/04/2013 02:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Well I guess we could say something like:
FOREIGN KEY (a-col) WHERE (a-condition) REFERENCES b(b-col) WHERE
(b-condition)
But it's somewhat ugly.
OK, those make sense. I wonder whether this should be done via
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
We should also consider the possibility of a user trying to
deliberately install and older release. For example, if the user has
1.0, 1.0--1.1, 1.1, 1.1--1.2, and 1.2--1.0 (a downgrade script) with
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom Well, okay, but you've not said anything that wouldn't be
Tom handled just as well by some logic that adds a fixed
Tom integer-constant-zero flag column to the rows going into the
Tom
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:43:44PM -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:26 PM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:15:36AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 11/28/2013 03:24 AM,
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
The downside of SQL-MED, particularly the way postgres implemented the
driver API, is that each driver is responsible for for all
optimization efforts and I think this is bad.
There was never any intention that that would be the final state of
things.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
In more normal cases, however, the system can (and probably should)
figure out what was intended by choosing the *shortest* path to get to
the intended version. For
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:07:04 -0800
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 12/04/2013 07:33 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Wow, Josh, I'm surprised to hear this from you.
Well, I figured it was too angry to propose for an LWN article. ;-)
So you're going to make us write it for you :)
The
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net wrote:
I also wasn't exaggerating the reception I got when I tried to talk
about IO and PostgreSQL at LinuxCon and other events. The majority of
Linux hackers I've talked to simply don't want to be bothered with
PostgreSQL's
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I assume what would happen is the slave would PANIC upon seeing a WAL
record code it didn't recognize.
I
* Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote:
I think that's an excellent idea. If one of our developers could find the
time to attend that, I think that could be very productive. While I'm not
on the funds team, I'd definitely vote for funding such participation out
of community funds if
Having nothing better to do over the holiday weekend, I decided to
pursue a number of ideas for improving performance that I thought
about a long time ago. These include:
* Pre-fetching list node pointers. This looks to be moderately
promising, but I'm certainly not going to be the one to land
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom Well, sure, but I was only suggesting adding it when the
Tom aggregate asks for it, probably via a new flag column in
Tom pg_aggregate.
Sure, I was only pointing out the necessity.
Tom The question you're evading is what additional
Jonathan,
For those interested in the details... (1) It's not quite 50/50, that's one
bound for how the balance is allowed to go. (2) Anybody trying to add
tunables to the kernel tends to run into resistance. Exposing thousands of
knobs tends to lead to a situation where you *have* to be an
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net wrote:
For those interested in the details... (1) It's not quite 50/50, that's one
bound for how the balance is allowed to go. (2) Anybody trying to add
tunables to the kernel tends to run into resistance. Exposing thousands of
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:01:37 -0800
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Perhaps even better: the next filesystem, storage, and memory management
summit is March 24-25.
Link? I can't find anything Googling by that name. I'm pretty sure we
can get at least one person there.
It looks
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
I guess I could write a proper patch to have code setting up a scankey
also set a flag that indicated that it was acceptable to assume that
the special built-in comparator would do fine. ...
I'd be happy with a scheme with only one built-in comparator,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
I guess I could write a proper patch to have code setting up a scankey
also set a flag that indicated that it was acceptable to assume that
the special built-in comparator would do fine.
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk writes:
Tom == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Tom But anyway, what I'm thinking right now is that these questions
Tom would all go away if the aggregate transfunction were receiving
Tom the rows and sticking them into the tuplestore. It could
On 12/2/13, 9:14 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
What I want to build is an “extension distribution” software that knows
how to prepare anything from PGXN (and other places) so that it's fully
ready for being used in the database. Then the main client would run as
a CREATE EXTENSION
On 12/2/13, 2:33 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
Just tossing an idea out there. What if you could install an extension
by specifying not a local file name but a URL. Obviously there's a
security issue but for example we could allow only https URLs with
verified domain names that are in a list of
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
