donate it to the project as a whole. What are
people's thoughts on
this?
Yes it has a Java requirement but hey that is a lot easier than a
GTK requirement to fullfill.
My thought is that it could be included as pgAccess used to be.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home
Hello,
If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
but doesn't that mean that
psql would be separate as well?
J
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake writes:
I thought that we might donate it to the project as a whole. What are
people's thoughts
D'oh, just clued into the 'java' aspect ... Joshua, will this run as a
JSP, remotely, through Jakarta-Tomcat? One of the limitations of pgAdmin,
as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that you can run it remotely ... if
you could run pgManage under something like Jakarta-Tomcat as a JSP, that
I think the Emeritus word might be too hard for non-native English
speakers, and even for less educated English speakers.
Isn't that an even better reason to use it? :)
My personal opinion would be that they can use dictionary.com if they
don't know what it means.
Chris
Hello,
My feeling is that advocacy should be just that: Advocacy.
It doesn't matter who the intended audience is in reality. However,
it is also important to remember that technical experts typically
don't need to be sold on PostgreSQL.
PHBs on the other hand probably do and thus much of our
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think that list is a pretty dumb idea in the first place. We have a
list of developers with company names next to them. Let readers make
their own recognition evaluation.
Your assuming that
I can fire up our solaris machine and let you have access to it if you
want to do some destructive testing.
Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For what it's worth, I have been running regression on Solaris with
numerous of the betas, and RC1 and [just now] RC2, with
Hello,
If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be
appropriate.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,
Of course, while I was editing press releases at 2am, I started thinking about
our next version. It seems certain
As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
Yes but these are people running Unix/Linux/BSD not Windows ;)
have to come up with better reasons. Also note that most major number
changes in
Hello,
Personally I am for long release cycles, at least for major releases.
In fact
as of 7.4 I think there should possibly be a slow down in releases with more
incremental releases (minor releases) throughout the year.
People are running their companies and lives off of PostgreSQL, they
Hello,
I think what the person is looking for is:
COMPANY PostgreSQL for Red Hat Enterprise 3.0.
They probably have some commercial mandate that says that they have
to have a commercial company backing the product itself. This doesn't
work for most PostgreSQL companies because they back the
of
all support companies.
What in the world brought this on? I wasn't suggesting any of this. I
was just trying to help clarify the guys statement. He couldn't have
been talking about Red Hat for all I care.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Regards,
Hans
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home
Is there some way to remove this piece of sh^H^Hlegacy from the
configure script? Does anybody actually use info?
All of GNU.
Cheers,
D
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
Based on the below wouldn't they also have to go after Microsoft?
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
trollOf course, now that SCO is claiming ownership of BSD code .
/troll
Interesting thread that ... last I read on the FreeBSD lists was
speculation
Hello,
My understanding is that they use the BSD stack (at least as the
basis) for TCP/IP. Windows that is.
J
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Based on the below wouldn't they also have to go after Microsoft?
Depends ... does MicroSoft use BSD TCP
Does that mean I have supplied Logictree Systems PostgreSQL? PostgreSQL with
Logictree Systems TSearch2?
Actually to some degree, yes. Of course a lot would depend on the type
of contract you have with them you may be responsible for that code.
However, I would love to see those patches.
Breaking all the client-visible LO APIs, for one thing ...
Erck.
1. A larger identifier
2. An identifier that is not typed to the underlying system (oid)
3. The ability to be indexed
We may benefit. Am I on crack?
I don't see what you're getting at with #2 and #3 at all.
pg_largeobject already has an index (which is used by all the LO
operations). Again, don't see what the width of the object ID column
has to do with it.
I was more after the not having an OID than the width of the ID column.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
We're still at cross-purposes then. pg_largeobject doesn't have OIDs
(in the sense of per-row OIDs). What I thought you were complaining
about was the chosen datatype of the LO identifier column (loid), which
happens to be OID.
O.k. that was my main concern, which per your statement is
I seen that the configure is done with:
--with-krb5=/usr.
make sure that you have krb5-devel installed.
I also try to install the RPM already builded but I obtain:
file /usr/include/sqltypes.h from install of
postgresql-devel-7.4-0.5PGDG conflicts with file from package
Hello,
All due respect but this seems like a completely insane idea.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
Has this subject been discussed before?
I did not find any references to it in the archives.
I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
container like JBoss and a
I'm not going to be able to set this up. I just had to put my server into
cold storage due to dismantling my office, and running the TPC stuff on my
laptop is a joke.
I'll contact the OSDL folks to see if they can run it.
We can... depending on what you need for a server.
J
--
Two suggestions..
1. Patch linux kernel for HT aware scheduler.
2. Try running Xeons in HTdisabled modes.
See if that helps. I would say using 2.6 on it is recommended anyways.. If
possible of course..
I would avoid 2.6 on a production machine. 2.6 breaks alot (not as in a
bad
Would this be at all useful?
Someone mentioned that the 'fees' were relatively high though ... that you
lose a fair amount off the top *to* Sourceforge?
If we were going to do this, I would suggest just going right through
paypal.
Marc G. Fournier
accepts electronic check but remember we are talking
about donations here, not a for profit accepting credit cards.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
have some of the better fees, and have yet to any major complaints about
their services ... we haven't found any major complaints about our current
one
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
Le Mardi 09 Décembre 2003 16:15, Ivelin Ivanov a écrit :
I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
container like JBoss and a scalable database like
PostgreSQL will be a blast.
Why not cut all trees on earth and replace them with plastic? Before that,
Hello,
An quicker option would be to use rsync (on a stopped database of
course). You can rsync to a new directory (off the filesystem) and then
reformat the data filesystem and move it back.
J
Somasekhar Bangalore wrote:
Hi,
I too had the same problem; There was one query which used to
memory have you allocated?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
im using debain with kernel 2.4.23-pre7, on P4 , (postgres 7.4.1)
what can be wrong ?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe
Hello,
Perhaps you have too many open files? What else is running on this
machine?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
ivan wrote:
max_connections=200
shared_buffers=2000
ram = 500M + 300M swap
hdd = infinite
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
hi
i need to connect to by my database
.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Alex
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http
Lamar Owen wrote:
I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary tree on the ftp
site, and was wondering what the group thought about purging old binaries.
What I was thinking would be to remove all but the last minor release of each
major version. Thus, I would remove 7.4, but
Greg Stark wrote:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i would like to begin work on the TODO item
Allow backend to output result sets in XML
I am not sure why it's phrased that way --- surely the code to hack
Hello,
With the new preload option is there any benefit/drawback to using
pl/Python versus
pl/pgSQL? And no... I don't care that pl/Python is now considered
untrusted.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support
such as ALTER that effect the
SEQUENCE should
use ALTER SEQUENCE.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Cheers,
D
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED
this many times with customers as their traffic on the
database grows. A simple check would be of great, great use.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Co
Hello,
When was the last time you ran a reindex? Or a vacuum / vacuum full?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Jason Essington wrote:
I am running PostgreSQL 7.3.3 on OS X Server 10.2
The database has been running just fine for quite some time now, but
this morning it began
may have a corrupt system index that needs to be reindexed.
Sincerely,
Johsua D. Drake
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Jason Essington wrote:
Both vacuum [full] and reindex fail with that same error.
vacuum is run regularly via a cron job.
-jason
On Feb 14, 2004, at 2:29 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote
Hello,
I personally ran into the exact same thing with another customer.
They are running RedHat 8.0 with (2.4.20 at the time). We had to upgrade
them to 2.4.23 and reboot. Worked like a charm. This was about two months
ago. I swear it was almost the exact same error.
Sincerely,
Joshua D
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter log_line_info and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line
Is it possible to put WALs and CLOGs into different tablespaces? (maybe
different RAID systems). Some companies want that ...
You can do this now, but it would be nice to be able to have it actually
configurable versus the hacked linked method.
J
--
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
and/or price ...
Really? What about BMW, Volvo or Mercedes?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:45:35AM -0500, Rod Taylor wrote:
Not that I'm volunteering, but I think the biggest issue is many users
simply don't know how to approach the problem. Some docs on using
syslog, cron, etc. with PostgreSQL to accomplish maintenace jobs would
That is why I suggested providing a pre-written/pre-compiled/installed
function for CSV (call it CSV?). Advanced users could still write
their own as people can write many other things if they know their ways.
As someone who just went through a whole truckload of crap getting
delimited
specific type of import you are performing.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth
corruption ;)
Any thoughts?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator
Hey,
We have many machines that run Solaris. I know that there are patches
out there for some of the bugs in 7.4.2 for Solaris but I was wondering
what the timeline for an official 7.4.3 was?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Hello,
We are able to compile without issue but it won't start. The exact same
config works perfectly with 7.3.6. Here is the output:
$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster -D
data
DEBUG: /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster: PostmasterMain: initial
environ dump:
DEBUG:
g a data store for many databases, not a single database. But I think
it is far too sanctified by history to change now, just as Ken
Thompson now wishes he had put an 'e' on the end of 'creat' but can't
go back and fix it. Maybe we should think about a symlink/hardlink to
use a better name.
Hello,
My personal opinion is that contrib should be removed entirely. Just
have a contrib.txt that says all contrib modules are at pgfoundry or
whatever.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Jan Wieck wrote:
Taking into account that quite a few people have repeatedly stated that
the components
and required items
for PostgreSQL.
IMHO: PostgreSQL should include:
PostgreSQL
Psql
All development headers
C/C++ Libs
Everything else should be on SourceForge or Gforge or whatever. The
possible exception would be the pl stuff.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier
Hello,
Well perhaps we can have exceptions. TSearch would be a good exception
as it really should be integrated into PostgreSQL anyway.
There are very few of these that I think would be an issue.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
The problem with moving all contribs to gborg
for redhat, debian or even SuSE you would type:
apt-get install pg_autovacuum
or with redhat you might also do
yum install pg_autovacuum
But that is packaging and that is up to the developers of the particular
project.
Joshua D. Drake
My point is that all of this stuff shouldn't be in the core CVS
e autoconf (although it is a good idea). You don't
NEED PostgreSQL source etc...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Rod Taylor wrote:
We have the current issue of people not knowing that projects like
pgadmin exist or where to find the jd
. They are programmers
trying to do it a better way. Providing plPerl or plPython etc... allows
them to stay in a native and productive environment.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
my two cents.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5
The difference is that you could now correct for Great Bridge's problems,
which include but are not limited to: timing (4 years has changed a lot for
commercial acceptance of open source), funding ($25m was too much), and
strategy (this is not an quick attempt to copy Red Hat).
I think such a
...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
No, I agree that that would be foolish
not serious ...
Why not? Seemed like a fairly good argument both yours and mine ;)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
push.
Win32 -- if it won't make it, then 7.5 should push.
PITR is nice but not as vital (IMHO) as the two above.
Replication -- we have either via Replicator or Slony-I which is due in
a month.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Tatsuo Ishii
---(end of broadcast
I second this... the whole __ is hard to type and remember.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
How about bool_or() and bool_and()? Or at least something based on OR
and AND? I don't find ANY/ALL to be particularly mnemonic for this
usage anyway.
regards, tom lane
--
to be comfortable with plPython or plPerl than
plpgSQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
D. Drake
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http
The fact that windows has a heavy process / lightweight thread design
means little to me, since I'll likely never deploy a production postgresql
server on it that needs to handle any serious load.
Yes but Solaris also has a heavy process / lightweight thread design.
J
in production shops) that we should make a longer
development time for 7.5.
Personally, Win32, subtransactions and PITR are what we are after.
Second would be inclusion of plPHP and plPerlNG which are arguably the
most widely used languages to connect to PostgreSQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
.
^^^
Well that seems to be part of the problem. ext3 does not scale well at
all under load. You should probably upgrade to a better FS (like XFS). I
am not saying that your point isn't valid (it is) but upgrading to a
better FS will help you.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
???
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared
The much I am for pulling stuff that does not belong into core, doing
it just for the fun of cleaning up or trimming doesn't do. One of the
major functions of CVS is that one can tag collections of revisions
that together build a release, a known to be working snapshot of file
revisions. If
I assume your ecpg will be a patch to the existing ecpg rather than a
new verion, right?
Yes it is a patch against 7.4.2
J
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
a README couldn't be included in the src/pl/plphp directory
that says: look here
for the latest release etc...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
So, yea, I am frustrated. I know these features are hard and complex,
but I want them for PostgreSQL, and I want them as soon as possible. I
guess what really bugs me is that we are so close to having these few
remaining big features, and because they are so complex, they are taking
a lot
believe they are valid arguments too and if we were to do it we would
definately need to be
selective about which features get back ported but forward movement
can be in the present
tree as well.
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Uhhh?? Are you ripping out all core pls then? plPerlNG is supposed to
replace plPerl, I was talking with Bruce and he seemed to think that
(as long as the code was good enough) that we could incorporate
plPHP???
One reason
Bruce ;).
Seriously though, we all have the roles that we play. I don't think
redirecting specific resources to other
resources will help beyond slowing up the original resources.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org
This is very much different, because the PHP distribution contains the
PostgreSQL driver, whereas the other languages do not. So you would
have
PHP build depends on PostgreSQL
Ahh I see your point, EXCEPT :) plPHP does not require PostgreSQL
support to be built into PHP.
Sincerely,
Joshua D
PostgreSQL support.
Also PHP does not compile the PostgreSQL support by default.
This is no different that Perl, which also has a PostgreSQL driver but
plPerl does not require DBD::Pg to compile.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL build depends on PHP
Not good
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Of course not, but I still don't see your point. plPHP doesn't need
PHP+PostgreSQL support. Nor does PHP+PostgreSQL conflict with using
plPHP...
PHP doesn't even need to be installed for plPHP to work... You just
need the source tree for building
So you then have to build PHP twice, in an RPM build environment. You mean I
can't just have the headers installed to build plPHP? So, follow the
No you need to make sure that PHP is available as a shared lib.
1.) Build PostgreSQL
2.) Build PHP (with PostgreSQL client support)
3.) Build plPHP
So, why tie it into the PostgreSQL source tree? Won't it be popular
enough to live on its own, that it has to be distributed as part of the
core?
Honestly, I don't know if it would be popular enough on its own. Now the
plPerlNG that Andrew
and us are working, yes but plPHP? It is nifty, it
P. Python takes
actual thought to
produce something useful.
Whether or not that is a bad thing is for another argument :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Tatsuo Ishii
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
it either. June 15th maybe.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
applications to the database market.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Co-Founder Command Prompt, Inc.
Co-Author Practical PostgreSQL
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I just spoke with Lisa Vaas from eWeek. She is writing an article on
the upcoming PostgreSQL 7.3 release. (The release of 7.3 is scheduled
for tomorrow
Hello folks,
Been trying to test the latest source but the following places give
permission dened when trying to download:
ftp.postgresql.org
ftp.us.postgresql.org
ftp2.us.postgresql.org
mirror.ac.uk
Anybody got one that works?
J
Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at
Hello,
Pardon me while I pull my book out of various dark places. It has
been a very long week. I got it. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Been trying to test the latest source but the following places give
permission dened
Hello,
Perhaps you could provide some more detailed information?
Example of queries?
Type of hardware?
Operating system?
Why are you running a vacuum every 45 seconds? Increase your fsm_pages and
run it every hour.
Are you sure the vacuums are trampling eachother and thus getting more
than one
...
Databaes is about 50 megs of mostly text. Less than 5 megs in large objects.
Hardware/OS is:
Dual Athlon MP 2800
3 Gig ECC Ram
3Ware Hardware Raid
7 SATA Drives in a RAID 10 (1 hot spare).
Fedora Core 1
Any thoughts?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S
,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Sigh, because vacuums take away from performance.
This is a known issue that has been pretty much resolved for 7.5. Vacuum
in 7.5 does not take even close to as much IO resources.
Imagine a table that has
to be updated on the order of a few thousand times a minute. Think about
the drop in
The "PostgreSQL Enhanced Server" (How's that name? Maybe we call it Zerver
and use PEZ?) idea is how to take the excellent core of PostgreSQL and
productize it in much the same way distributions take the Linux kernel and
may a GNU/Linux system.
It would seem to me that this is more
Hello,
You all are behind... Python is king.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Greg,
You don't like Java/C#. I do.
What appear here is that you hate C++.
I'm a C++ developer since long time now, and I can not use JAVA and or C#
just for a couple of reason:
1
Hello,
I seem to recall that HyperThreading and PostgreSQL != good stuff...
There was a whole bunch of stuff recently on this... google the archives.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Jaime Casanova wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me if postgresql has problems with xeon processors?
If so, there is any
So it can't be compiled by other compiler? Say Digital Mars or some
Microsoft or Borland compiler?
Nope. It needs the GNU tool set.
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 -
version. Perl
5.00503 is ancient. Try upgrading to at least 5.6.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
SPI.xs: In function `XS__spi_exec_query':
SPI.xs:51: `aTHX_' undeclared (first use in this function)
SPI.xs:51: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
SPI.xs:51: for each function it appears
of
perl that the perl community itself suggests that you should upgrade.
Perl 5.00503 is RedHat 6.2 genre... That is scary old.
I believe even RedHat 7.3 came with Perl 5.6 and that is old as well.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Joe
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S
Currently we have this in plperl.c:
require Safe;
I am thinking of submitting a patch to replace this with use Safe
2.09; to enforce use of a version without the known vulnerability.
Any objections?
I have none, except will 2.09 work with 5.00503?
cheers
andrew
Hello,
I know there is a patch coming Monday with a great deal of bug fixes.
J
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I have a setup that instead of refusing to load trusted functions if
the Safe version is not up to date, forces them to error
Hello,
Perhaps you have an open transaction that isn't closing and thus the
pg_xlog continues to grow?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
today I add 4 new columns to a table with 4E+06 rows,
I also update to an initial value
NOT_LOGGED_IN
PROGRAM_ERROR
STORAGE_ERROR
TIMEOUT_ON_RESOURCE
TOO_MANY_ROWS
TRANSACTION_BACKED_OUT
VALUE_ERROR
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote:
Can anyone check how well the syntax of plpgsql EXCEPTION, as described
at
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-control-structures.html
ct that
we finally have a port to the most used
operating system (regardless if that is good or bad) in the world.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even if Savepoints don't make it, we'll still have:
Savepoints are in, as is
that is required to run that database. Including users.
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
I've been looking at this for a while now, and will probably give it
a go for 7.6/8.
Let me know when you do, I'd be interested in collaborating.
Command Prompt, if would help could help sponsor this project.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Chris
--
Command Prompt
implementation of the pL. You just
have to remember to make all ' a '' :) (at least for the most part).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
don't think anyone has really bridged that gap. The database guys
generally don't like running application code in their database, mostly
because it creates new failure modes
1 - 100 of 2933 matches
Mail list logo
