dressing...
Could be wrong, though...
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
/0309/4.JHdbcourseS03.pdf
How about extra credit for PITR?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
as a sequential
device rather than a random access device.
Isn't a TID-List-Fetch implementation a crucial first step in the
right direction?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives
to wal, I guess. That might actually be clearer. xlog could become
xstatus or xactstatus or just xact.
active_xdata
active_cdata
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map
://www.ecommercetax.com/official_docs/SSTP%20-%20Rounding.pdf
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane wrote:
It occurred to me today that it would not be difficult to implement a
direct check on the physical size of the execution stack.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
is in adding OIDs to rows that
initially did not have 'em when returned from the SELECT DISTINCT plan.
Okay.
So your best immediate workaround is to create the first temp table with
oids, or create the second one without.
Thanks!
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast
last time this subject was dicussed, I believe it was Mike Mascari
who proposed and implemented another solution which is more client-side
oriented.
I humbly confess it wasn't me. We use CORBA
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1
, a message should be output to
read it:
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/presentations/os2002/lane_tom.tar.gz
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Simon Riggs wrote:
- All operations on TEMP relations are no longer logged in WAL, nor are
they involved in checkpoints, thus improving performance. (Tom)
That is great news!
Looking forward to 7.5 already,
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast
-server/src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c?rev=1.58content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/storage/smgr/smgr.c?rev=1.58content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
Actually, that was an Aug 6, 2002 commit, not 2003 which would make
it 7.3, right? So Simon, my I humbly ask from where you culled this
change in CVS tip?
Mike Mascari
assuming 32-bit quantities that will break once ~4.2 billion
is reached and I get index scans without quoting or casting free.
But IIRC there's a change in the development tree to jettison the
requirement for quoting/casting...
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast
:
==
...
select * from foo where bar = 1
...
This is Oracle syntax:
==
SQL select * from foo where bar = 1;
...
mysql select * from foo where bar = 1;
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast
pg_description;
count
---
1542
(1 row)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] select count(*) from pg_description;
count
---
1541
(1 row)
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http
to COMMENT ON
non-local databases to an ERROR in 7.5 or not. It was my fault from
the beginning - but once I'd implemented COMMENT ON for tables and
columns I just couldn't stop... :-)
Mike Mascari
Mike Mascari wrote:
..
The comments are stored only in the database's pg_description where
. With your new fuzzy comparison
patch is twelve still the appropriate number? Or does the fuzzy
comparison scale all planning time down and therefore the default
threshold should remain where it is?
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you
on Oracle is only a necessity
if the DBA hasn't made use of resource limits - PROFILEs. ;-)
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
to read
the image file from disk?
PostgreSQL really needs a maintained type library as a single
project where people can contribute types, functions, operators, and
aggregates, such as the recently discussed email type.
Mike Mascari
joke
Just be sure not to actually compress/decompress the JPEG
% of the bits in the postgres binary you'd
not find it to be more buggy than the Postgres95/early 6.x series...
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
with the comment. Example:
COMMIT WORK COMMENT 'A complex distributed Tx';
Perhaps there is some common ground between the 2PC implementation
and PITR?
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
the advocacy group performed any polling in this
area that might shed some light as to what users and potential users
might want?
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org
important features like the IN optimization and a quick 7.5 would
have Win32 and PITR. It's almost as if a cron job reposts this
thread every 6 - 12 months. For those of us that are desirous of
PITR, it's a 6 month reposting that is becoming painful to read...
Mike Mascari
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Mike Mascari wrote:
A quick google of 7.4 Win32 release will reveal that the above was
precisely what was said about 7.4: it would be released to not hold
up important features like the IN optimization and a quick 7.5 would
have Win32 and PITR. It's
is implementation
dependent. Therefore PostgreSQL is in compliance, but its
compliance is not very popular.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Langille wrote:
DECLARE
time1 TIMESTAMP;
time2 TIMESTAMP;
sleeptime NUMBER;
BEGIN
sleeptime := 5;
SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP INTO time1 FROM DUAL
for the life of the invocation, while stored procedures don't.
It is PostgreSQL, after all, that has merged the two concepts
into one.
Maybe someone could test version 9 with a FUNCTION that executes
the same PL/SQL code and returns the difference between the two
times.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL
successfully completed.
SQL select * from rbr_foo;
Oracle isn't processing those statements interactively. SQL*Plus
is waiting on the / to send the PL/SQL block to the database.
I suspect its not going to take Oracle more than a second to
insert a row...
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mike Mascari wrote:
Oracle isn't processing those statements interactively. SQL*Plus
is waiting on the / to send the PL/SQL block to the database.
I suspect its not going to take Oracle more than a second to
insert a row...
Oh, I understand now. He delayed when
SELECT SYSDATE
15 INTO time2
16 FROM DUAL;
17 RETURN (time2 - time1);
18 END;
19 /
Function created.
SQL select mydiff FROM dual;
MYDIFF
--
.34722
I can't test the use of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP because I have Oracle
8, not 9.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
/a90125/functions2.htm#80856
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the /. or the Oracle statement?
Here's the Oracle statement:
http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report/msg0.html
Hope that helps,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once
.
Even though TRUNCATE was modeled after Oracle's TRUNCATE and
Oracle's TRUNCATE commits the running tx, truncates the
relation, and starts a new tx, regardless of whether or not
TRUNCATE is the first statement of the tx?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast
, such as PL/SQL recursion
depth, a new attribute would be added to pg_profile to handle
the limitation...
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, that's a joke...)
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
when the remote server issues the COMMIT
and then the local server crashes?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Karel Zak wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:31:22PM -0400, Mike Mascari wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Added to TODO:
* Allow limits on per-db/user connections
Could I suggest that such a feature falls under the category of
resource limits, and that the TODO should read something like
anything or if there is something you think we should
add, please let me know.
Is there any thought about changing the protocol to support
two-phase commit? Not that 2PC and distributed transactions
would be implemented in 7.4, but to prevent another protocol
change in the future?
Mike Mascari
Neil Conway wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any thought about changing the protocol to support
two-phase commit? Not that 2PC and distributed transactions would be
implemented in 7.4, but to prevent another protocol change in the
future?
My understanding is that 2PC
: Oracle functions invoked in DML statements can't
record any changes to the database. So if the above is the
cause, I wouldn't have any problems with the patch being
reversed. Maybe separate privileges for read-only vs. read-write
functions are in order at some point in the future though...
Mike
/iexist.htm
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I curious if any of the rewriting of EXISTS and NOT EXISTS would
address the problem described by Date:
That should read I'm curious...
http://www.firstsql.com/iexist.htm
We are not here to redefine the SQL spec ... and especially
administration is supposed to work under
such a scenario though...
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL
=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8threadm=20021106111554.69ae1dcd.pgsql%40snaga.orgrnum=2prev=/groups%3Fq%3DNAGAYASU%2BSatoshi%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26hl%3Den
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Tom referenced earlier, but I'd guess there might be an assumption of 2PC
support in the implementation. In other words, I think we still need 2PC, regardless
of the method of replication. And if Satoshi Nagayasu has an implementation ready,
why not investigate its possibilities?
Mike Mascari
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Mascari wrote:
Okay. But please keep in mind that a 2-phase commit implementation
is used for more than just replication.
This is a good point. I don't want to push Postgres-R as our solution.
Rather, I have
=%25N%13_446_START_RESTART_N%25
The standard is 2PC based.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
in a Berkeley DB? ;-)
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
)
-
0
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does Oracle's PL/SQL have a concept of record variables? If so, what
do they do in this situation?
In Oracle 8, a row of NULLs:
1 CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo(t IN NUMBER)
2
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's a rowtype variable, though, not a record variable. I believe our
code will work the same as Oracle for that case.
4 TYPE EmpRec IS RECORD
of an object to be a group
(role) rather than strictly a user.
Also, at least in Oracle, one can grant ROLEs to other ROLEs. I don't know if that is
what the SQL standard says though:
GRANT role1 TO role2;
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast
appreciated.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello. I have some code which generates subselects in the target
list of a query and then aggregates the results. The code allows
the user to determine the attributes of the aggregation. If the
user chooses to aggregate on the same value
would be to
replace the postmaster with a CORBA-based server process with a
well defined interface. At a minimum, if a binary protocol is
the ultimate destination, perhaps some of the mapping of various
types could be borrowed from the specs.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
feature Oracle doesn't have, and to remain
consistent, I agree with all of those that have voted for #1.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail
) ;-)
Peter E. was rewriting psql and wanted the COMMENT on operators to
reflect a COMMENT on the underlying function
I submitted a patch to do that - I just do what I'm told ;-)
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe
in the same transaction, but
that's about it. People have argued that if there are *RI* triggers on a
table, that TRUNCATE should be disallowed, as in Oracle. But TRUNCATE
from inception to date has never dropped triggers...
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end
:
...
ON COMMIT { DROP | { DELETE | PRESERVE } ROWS };
I suppose I could just change the code to query the catalogue for those
temporary tables created during the transaction and issue DROP TABLEs by
hand. But I thought it might be an idea of value to others.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... Would it be possible to have either a GUC setting or a grammar
change to allow TEMPORARY tables to be dropped at transaction commit?
This seems like a not unreasonable idea; but the lack of other
Rocco Altier wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Mike Mascari wrote:
That is what I want to do, except by extending the grammar. I must admit
to actually being surprised that a TEMP table created inside a
transaction lived after the transaction completed. That's when I looked
at the standard
be nice to also have it fire up under Windows CE as well ;-)
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
is against 7.2.1
source. The grammar introduced is of the form:
CREATE TEMP TABLE ... ON COMMIT DROP;
Is this a desirable feature? Seems pretty useful to me.
Great! I'm give this a try.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast
command:
EXECUTE my_procedure();
The Oracle call interface defines a function to call stored procedures:
OCIStmtExecute();
Likewise, the privilege necessary to execute a stored procedure is
'EXECUTE' as in:
GRANT EXECUTE ON my_procedure TO mascarm;
Again, FWIW.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
at a fast rate, perhaps faster than MySQL at
this point.
Its all due to sort-order. If Oracle was open source MySQL would still
be more popular. ;-)
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-08.html
I'd still think it would be a good policy to make a security release.
However, without user resource limits in PostgreSQL, anyone can make a
machine useless with a query like:
SELECT *
FROM pg_class a, pg_class b, pg_class c, pg_class d, pg_class e, ... ;
Mike
in the org.postgresql.text schema.
How about them apples?
If this is an insane idea, its 3:32 A.M. my time ;-)
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send
CreateHardLink() if on 2K/XP
2. Will try to use the BackupWrite() method
3. Failing #2 will just copy the file
See how fun Microsoft makes things?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go
file
notepad dir2.lnk - Displays link contents
That means for a native port with a different PGXLOG directory
running on NT4, the only choice *using links* is to make the
native port shell short-cut aware.
I could be wrong but I don't think so.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to simulate traditional unlink()
behavior.
Hope that helps,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
and the
MOVEFILE_DELAY_UNTIL_REBOOT flag will add the appropriate
entries into the system registry so that the next time the
machine reboots it will remove the files specified. Its a real
pain and a real hack of an OS.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mike Mascari wrote:
I will do some testing with concurrency and let you know. But
don't get your hopes up. This is one of the many advantages that
TABLESPACEs have when more than one relation is stored in a
single DATAFILE. There was Oracle for MS-DOS, after all
Mike Mascari wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mike Mascari wrote:
I will do some testing with concurrency and let you know. But don't
get your hopes up. This is one of the many advantages that
TABLESPACEs have when more than one relation is stored in a single
DATAFILE. There was Oracle
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mike Mascari wrote:
Actually, looking at the pg_pwd code, you want to determine a
way for:
1. Process 1 opens foo
2. Process 2 opens foo
3. Process 1 creates bar
4. Process 1 renames bar to foo
5. Process 2 can continue to read data from the open file handle
and get
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Mike Mascari wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Mike Mascari wrote:
Actually, looking at the pg_pwd code, you want to determine a
way for:
1. Process 1 opens foo
2. Process 2 opens foo
3. Process 1 creates bar
4. Process 1 renames bar to foo
5. Process 2 can
that
TABLESPACEs have when more than one relation is stored in a
single DATAFILE. There was Oracle for MS-DOS, after all..
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Mike Mascari wrote:
Yes! Indeed that does work.
Thinking back, I think that may still fail on Win95 (using MoveFile).
Once in the past I had to work on (un)installers for Win* and I
vaguely remember Win95 being more strict than Win98 but that may
CreateFile() with
FILE_SHARE_DELETE, then any subsequent CreateFile() calls will
fail unless they too have FILE_SHARE_DELETE. In other words, if
one of us can delete this file while its open, any of us can.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Mike Mascari wrote:
I think that's a rather poor description. I think it just means
that if the file is opened once via CreateFile() with
FILE_SHARE_DELETE, then any subsequent CreateFile() calls will
fail unless they too have FILE_SHARE_DELETE
be Access Denied. Are the places in the backend
that use rename() and unlink() renaming and unlinking files that
are only opened for a brief moment by other backends?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our
that
the SQL standard defines temporary relations as surviving across
transactions? If so, I'd bet those of us who use
transaction-local temporary tables could get few drops more of
performance from an ON COMMIT drop patch w/o fsync.
Any thoughts?
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce wrote:
Yes, someone from India has a project to test LRU-K and MRU for
large table scans and report back the results. He will
implement whichever is best.
Did this make it into 7.3?
No, we never heard back from that guy
This is what I get in Oracle 8:
SQL CREATE TABLE test (value VARCHAR (10));
Table created.
SQL INSERT INTO test VALUES ('Mike Mascari');
INSERT INTO test VALUES ('Mike Mascari')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column
SQL quit
Of course, if the standard
ow, anyone can query this table as:
SELECT * FROM employees;
Its a namespace thing, basically.
Hope that helps,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 10:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
that each new feature added to PostgreSQL opens up a very
large can of worms. Schemas are such a feature and the security system
should be prepared for it.
FWIW,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
It would make sense to split privileges on tables from privileges on
schemas
as possible, but I looked through the change log and
didn't see anything specific WRT large joins. I was wondering if any
work had been done in that area for 7.1. I realize you can only
squeeze so much blood from stone, but
Thanks for any info,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
impressive improvement in planning
speeduntil I actually used the explicit JOIN syntax described in
11.2. Instanteous results! Instantaneous.
Thanks a bunch,
(still in shock)
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
. With the explicit join syntax,
it allows me to design the database 'the right way'. I basically used
EXPLAIN SELECT... to determine the explicit join order, so as the
data changes, its something I'll have to do on occassion to ensure
good performance, but at least its now possible. :-)
Mike Mascari
, much like pg_description and
COMMENT ON. This is obviously an informal suggestion to determine if the
idea should be rejected out-of-hand.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http
to automatically reindex
your entire DB.
Just a thought,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Reina wrote:
I recall seeing a message by Tom Lane stating that dropping and
re-creating a primary index may speed up db performance. Is there a
SQL command that will do this?
My current method
to the language in which the database is
installed, but it wouldn't care what OIDs were assigned (if any) to
the various objects being documented.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once
for
users to use.
Just my 2 cents, of course,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
salaries;
no rows selected
So it seems to me that the major reason is to preserve GRANT/REVOKE
privileges issues against the object in question.
FWIW,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ
statistics collector,
Oracle's profiles must be enabled in the initSID.ora configuration
file since it takes a few cycles to actually account for user
activity.
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane writes:
I believe the primary reason why PL languages aren't installed by
default
You need to change the pg_hba.conf file in your PostgreSQL
installation so that password authentication is used. Check out:
http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?client-authentication.html
for details.
Hope that helps,
Mike Mascari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Balaji Venkatesan wrote:
Hi List
:
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA04-147A.html
For what it's worth,
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
leading a secret life...
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
- who knows where) changed its behavior and never
performed similarly...
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inheritance: No
I think it'd be a fair statement that Date Darwen would have the
relvar inheritance ripped out of PostgreSQL as an experiment gone bad...
Mike Mascari
P.S.: D is the language of the future:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d
Ha!
---(end of broadcast
::=
savepoint name
| simple target specification
savepoint name ::= identifier
and
rollback statement ::=
ROLLBACK [ WORK ] [ AND[ NO ] CHAIN ]
[ savepoint clause ]
savepoint clause ::=
TO SAVEPOINT savepoint specifier
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast
they'll look like a fool
pronouncing the name aloud. I remember back in '94 being corrected
when talking about Linux in the enterprise - and I was corrected in
the wrong direction.
Someone needs to poke the propaganda minister with a stick.
Mike Mascari
---(end of broadcast
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
