Re: [PATCHES] polymorphic arguments and return type for PL/pgSQL

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
clared types if the > caller didn't setup the FuncExpr node. This will result in "plpgsql functions cannot return type anyarray" which is at best misleading. It'd be better to have a specific error message, say "could not determine actual return type for poly

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
as this. Why are you using a nonstandard syntax? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
draft version in our developer's FAQ, IIRC. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] Postgresql.conf, initdb patch

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
now that I look more closely at the new docs, there are some classifications that seem pretty bizarre. For instance, CLIENT_MIN_MESSAGES has nothing to do with the server log and doesn't seem to belong in a section about logging ... regards, tom lane ---

Re: [PATCHES] Postgresql.conf, initdb patch

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is CLIENT_MIN_MESSAGES for, then? Controls which messages get sent to the client. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your

Re: [PATCHES] Postgresql.conf, initdb patch

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
orting and Logging"? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] Postgresql.conf, initdb patch

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
ubmit a patch for both runtime.sgml and postgresql.conf.sample? I can fold that in while I'm doing the other stuff... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] polymorphic arguments and return type for PL/pgSQL

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
sitions in the argument type vector. BTW, I can't see any need to include the return type in the hash key --- wouldn't it be predetermined given the argument types? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2:

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
nly shouldn't have a name as generic as resolve_type. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> You're not providing enough info to resolve_type to let it handle all >> four cases correctly. > No, resolve_type() is not at all specific to polymorphic aggregates. It > implements the rules of polymorph

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
rence from ANY is that multiple occurences of ANYELEMENT are all constrained to stand for the same type.) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate su

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
on for it outside of deriving a polymorphic aggregate's state type, though. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EM

Re: [PATCHES] polymorphic arguments and return type for PL/pgSQL

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
ed with the current function cache entry. Then it would be practical to recover the memory associated with an obsoleted cache entry. But we've lived without this so far, so I guess it's not causing many people problems. regards, tom lane -

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
tual assigned result type, and then we can run the normal checking operations without any problem. Applied patch attached, just FYI. (It still needs documentation updates, which I trust you will supply later.) Now back to looking at polymorphic aggregates... regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for listing runtime option details through server executable (pg_guc)

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
des a couple more flag bits to try to identify the behaviors of various variables. (I've not checked Aizaz' settings for the flags though, there might be some mistakes.) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Missing array support

2003-06-30 Thread Tom Lane
ted to correct the function signatures before anything else started to depend on them. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] Typo in backend/libpq/be-secure.c

2003-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
someone apply the below patch from Jon? Applied. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] ecpg warning

2003-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
y identified a bug here; initializing to NULL will just result in a guaranteed crash. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister You

Re: [PATCHES] UPDATED Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
n of GROUP BY lists so that a CUBE operation could be distinguished from ordinary grouping. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for listing runtime option details through server executable (pg_guc)

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
thers later? I also think the messages should be made more > consistent in various ways, but that can be done later. I made some small changes for improved consistency but I'm sure considerably more editing could be done. Have at it. regards, tom lane --

Re: [PATCHES] [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
will turn up ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] "fix" for plpgsql polymorphism

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
ould modify.) Or perhaps "functionname%type", although that seems subtly wrong for reasons I can't quite put my finger on at this late hour. Anyway, I'd like a representation that doesn't involve a phony variable. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] "fix" for plpgsql polymorphism

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
ry context > to ensure we don't leak memory when we don't want to. Yah. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] "fix" for plpgsql polymorphism

2003-07-03 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm not excited about picking a notation for the long term on the >> grounds that it takes the least code to implement today. > I knew you wouldn't be ;-) >> I admit I have not got a clearly-bett

[PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

2003-07-04 Thread Tom Lane
t perhaps some will disagree. 3. What should be the set of tested values? I have it as buffers: first to work of 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 50 connections: first to work of 100 50 40 30 20 10 but we could certainly argue for different rules. regards, tom

Re: [PATCHES] Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex

2003-07-05 Thread Tom Lane
hey'l fix it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex

2003-07-05 Thread Tom Lane
't this called flex 3.0? Or at least 2.6? Calling it a minor version bump has to violate a truth-in-advertising law or two. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] Another POC initdb patch

2003-07-06 Thread Tom Lane
ould be unable to cope with this. I disagree with the concept of expecting someone to supply useful values at install time anyway, since a newbie is the *least* likely to have any idea what to say at that time. Heck, the experts can hardly agree on what to use ...

Re: [PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

2003-07-06 Thread Tom Lane
erious applications. initdb can't be expected to do this unless you want to make it interactive, which would certainly make the RPM guys really unhappy. I'd rather see such considerations pushed off to a separate tool, some kind of "configuration wizard" perhaps.

Re: [PATCHES] fix for new SUSET GUC variables

2003-07-14 Thread Tom Lane
d changed in the meantime. If the comment had been there, it would not have saved him from this error, since I doubt it would have occurred to him to look for such a comment. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- T

Re: [PATCHES] typo in src/include/utils/array.h

2003-07-14 Thread Tom Lane
Weiping He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > seems the comment of macro ARR_LBOUND missed '(a)', > here is the diff: Applied, thanks! regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

2003-07-19 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE >> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take. Did we agree >> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

2003-07-19 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> No, it's a DONE. > I just tried this with CVS: > test=> show datestyle; > DateStyle > --- >ISO with US (NonEur

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-20 Thread Tom Lane
Kenji Sugita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This small patch eliminates relations in information_schema from oid2name > listing. Seems like it'd be a good idea to eliminate views and composite types as well. regards, tom lane ---

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
nd table names. As such, what it *ought* to be doing is suppressing views, since those don't have disk files --- they are only cluttering the listing with irrelevant data. If we put that in, there'd be no need to special-case information_schema. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] PATCH: Memory leaks on start-up

2003-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
e should unlink the file that it was originally told to unlink, regardless of what happens to those globals. If you are intent on spending code to free stuff just before the postmaster exits, a better fix would be for UnlinkLockFile to free its string argument after using it.

Re: [PATCHES] PATCH: Memory leaks on start-up

2003-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
h doing, and I'll accept the change as a matter of future-proofing that routine against such use. But on the argument of preventing resource leakage today, this is just a waste of code space. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [PATCHES] Czech NLS

2003-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
t on translation work after that. There will doubtless be some further tweaking, as Peter says. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] patch for compile warning on date.c

2003-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just noticed a new compile warning on date.c. Attached patch fixes it. Wups, I shoulda looked closer at that code I was forward-porting from 7.2. Thanks for the timely (ahem) correction! regards,

Re: [PATCHES] UPDATED Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
't keep a copy, and I'm not having any luck finding that message in the archives right now. Sumit, did you keep a copy? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive F

Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
e there are no other paths for parsing a date spec in the main date/time code? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] UPDATED Patch for adding DATACUBE operator

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm not having any luck finding that message in the archives right >> now. Sumit, did you keep a copy? > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=28882.105

Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
uot; (accept dd/mm/yy) and a third case that accepts yy/mm/dd. But I do not believe we can get away with deciding that common date formats aren't common. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch

2003-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
patches. The people who will be screaming about it don't read -patches. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
's'? I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
-parameter case of each function. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] PATCH: Memory leaks on start-up

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
what I changed, except that while I was at it I renamed freeaddrinfo2 to the hopefully more mnemonic freeaddrinfo_all). The change in miscinit should still work though. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe

Re: [PATCHES] Eliminate information_schema from oid2name listing

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I think v,s,t are all relkinds to exclude here. > Is 't' for toast tables? If so, we should allow 't', no? I wasn't sure > about 's'? Wups, you are right --- I was thinking &#

Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom, how do I pass PG_FUNCTION_ARGS to another function, while adding a > new parameter? I wouldn't. Do the PG_GETARGS in the wrapper, and have the called function take a normal C parameter list.

Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option

2003-07-27 Thread Tom Lane
rite any ARGISNULL checks. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

2003-07-28 Thread Tom Lane
ependently patching the same code with too long delay between patch submission and application. The comment wouldn't have prevented the error, because patch(1) can't read comments. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

2003-07-28 Thread Tom Lane
ng for the constants should help you find places you need to change when adding one. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] pgsql-7.3.3: Build process not SMP clean

2003-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Andreas Haumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But genbki.sh is not SMP safe: it uses a temporary file > TMPFILE="$TMPDIR/genbkitmp.c" Good catch. Applied for 7.4 --- thanks! regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
h of settings. In any case, we already have mechanisms for preventing specific users from altering data: that's what GRANT/REVOKE are for. I don't think anyone would have bothered with START TRANSACTION READ ONLY if it weren't required by the SQL spec. rega

Re: [PATCHES] array expression NULL fix [was: [HACKERS] odd behavior/possible bug]

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
avior is changed again. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
bjecting to using GUC for it. Send in a patch that, say, adds a bool column to pg_shadow, and I'll be happy. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
ns when needed. We now need the additional > prototype include patch from builtins.h. Applied with some editorializing. In particular, I don't believe the original did the right thing with (a - (b - c)). regards, tom lane --

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
UC for this is just asking for trouble. Even if there is no security hole today, it's very easy to imagine future changes in GUC that would unintentionally create one. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

[PATCHES] Any unapplied patches out there?

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
tip or a nightly snapshot tarball should be pretty-durn-close-to-the-beta. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] updateable cursors

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
t have been visible according to the original snapshot. I don't understand what the diffs in postgres.c are supposed to accomplish, but I can just about promise that they are misplaced too, since they won't affect queries executed via functions or SPI.

Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option

2003-07-30 Thread Tom Lane
ay, one is needed. But I disagree with your opinion anyway --- _ext for "extended" made perfect sense to me, especially for the get_indexdef one which adds more than just prettyprint functionality. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [PATCHES] Check for failed memory allocations in libpq

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
sult, for example, just moves the core dump somewhere else, unless you find reasonable fallbacks for *all* its callers (including applications you don't have the source code for, but in any case including every one of the calls in libpq). regards, tom lane

Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option]

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
ddition is not associative.) More: if the tree structure for ops of equal precedence looks like a + (b + c), then it's a near certainty that the user wrote those parentheses. Why would you think that removing them is pretty-printing? regards, tom lane ---

Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] ruleutils with pretty-print option]

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
sion=# select 1.0::float8 + ((-1.0::float8) + 1.0e-20::float8); ?column? -- 0 (1 row) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgre

Re: [PATCHES] updateable cursors

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This has been saved for the 7.5 release: > http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2 "Saved for"? It's not gonna be acceptable in its current form for 7.5, either. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] preload libraries patch [was: [GENERAL] hexadecimal to decimal]

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
tcl to try to execute the unknown-module load on every pltcl function call :-(. You really need two bits of state if you are going to have separate postmaster-time and backend-time initialization. Will fix and commit. regards, tom lane ---

Re: [PATCHES] Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
[ followup to old message ] Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch adds an autoconf test to check for the new incompatible version of > flex. Peter E. claims that CVS tip does work with flex 2.5.31 --- so we shouldn't need this patch anymore.

Re: [PATCHES] Check for failed memory allocations in libpq

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
he changes since 7.3... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] Numeric version of factorial()

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
mp_var(&fact, &one); Uh, why not use const_one? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] Numeric version of factorial()

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
gic just deals with int. We could leave the factorial(numeric) case open for a future implementation that uses gamma, if anyone gets hot to do it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to incr

Re: [PATCHES] contrib regression test update

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
did ;-). Sorry about the duplicated work ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

2003-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 15:29:37 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> The attached patch shows how initdb can dynamically determine reasonable >> shared_buffers and max_connections settings that will work on the >

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 7.4 COPY BINARY Format Change

2003-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
It might work as-is for text fields, and for integers on bigendian machines, but not for much else.) We are not going back to the pre-7.4 format. Sorry. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] statement level trigger causes pltcl, plpython SIGSEGV

2003-08-04 Thread Tom Lane
nt value; otherwise the patch looks fine. > If this patch is acceptable, I'll make similar changes to plpython. Please do. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] statement level trigger causes pltcl, plpython SIGSEGV

2003-08-04 Thread Tom Lane
ort. So the use of elog is sufficient documentation. IMHO anyway. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] Patch for select() -> poll() in libpq

2003-08-04 Thread Tom Lane
We are not going to back-patch this, since it creates portability hazards that we can't risk without a proper beta test cycle. Feel free to back-patch locally if it's in your way. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [PATCHES] CVSROOT/modules: earthdistance...

2003-08-06 Thread Tom Lane
ontrib module and putting earthdistance back with the rest, myself. But you'll have to convince Marc ;-) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] IS OF

2003-08-08 Thread Tom Lane
heritance cases (I think a child tuple should be said to be IS OF the tuple type of its parent). And what about domains --- should we say a domain type IS OF its base type? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] array/polymorphic function doc cleanup

2003-08-09 Thread Tom Lane
cking of my own. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] IS OF

2003-08-10 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm unconvinced that the parse-time-constant implementation Lockhart >> started has anything whatever to do with the semantics the SQL99 spec >> has in mind. > Yeah - I've realized this is

Re: [PATCHES] logging enhancements, minor code cleanup

2003-08-11 Thread Tom Lane
t once. I think that's a reasonable assumption; the question was just about whether your code acts sanely if the assumption isn't true. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] CVSROOT/modules: earthdistance...

2003-08-12 Thread Tom Lane
eave pgsql as a module that contains only pgsql-server, and thus not break anyone's checkout? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] array concat, et al patch (was: [GENERAL] join of array)

2003-08-17 Thread Tom Lane
t; docs to follow once > I'm sure what actually ends up being committed. You're on the hook for docs fixes... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] array concat, et al patch

2003-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's a patch for the documentation updates. Please apply. Applied with one small change --- I thought the last example failed to make the point that the elements of an ARRAY[] construct could be dissimilar. reg

Re: [PATCHES] gettext-related compile failure fix

2003-08-28 Thread Tom Lane
g us to remove functionality. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] to_timestamp not stable if date string shorter than

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
the 7.3 branch --- the rest of the changes didn't apply cleanly, and seemed unrelated anyway. This fixes the immediate complaint, but if there's some reason to apply the rest to 7.3.*, would you submit an additional patch against that branch? regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] to_timestamp not stable if date string shorter than

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm.. but the patch fix another small bug which I found today. Okay. Please send a patch against 7.3 tip and I'll throw it in. regards, tom lane ---(en

Re: [PATCHES] 7.3: [BUGS] to_timestamp not stable if date string shorter than

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Hmm.. but the patch fix another small bug which I found today. >> >> Okay. Please send a patch against 7.3 tip and I'll throw it in. > The patch for REL7_3_4 is attached. Applied, thanks.

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] PgSQL74b2: initdb fails (max_connections)

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang

2003-09-04 Thread Tom Lane
this hint is fairly silly, especially since it would pop out for simple misspellings of language names. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] doc patch - linux memory handling

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > can you the missing space on the marked line, or do you need another > patch from me? Fixed. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] IPV4 addresses on IPV6 machines in pg_hba.conf

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Pv6 setup here; please check that it does what you want. regards, tom lane *** src/backend/libpq/hba.c.origFri Sep 5 10:35:54 2003 --- src/backend/libpq/hba.c Fri Sep 5 16:24:41 2003 *** *** 673,685 if (cidr_slash) *cidr_slash = 

Re: [PATCHES] note on dropped columns in pg_attribute

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
be valid. */ attStruct->atttypid = InvalidOid; regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [PATCHES] IPV4 addresses on IPV6 machines in pg_hba.conf

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I thought this was still really messy, so I modified it to use a >> separate "promote v4 address to v6" subroutine. I've applied the >> attached patch (plus docs). It's not very well

Re: [PATCHES] IPV4 addresses on IPV6 machines in pg_hba.conf

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
ode either way I think. If you wanna try to clean it up more, be my guest ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] minor documentation improvements

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
ppercase though, no? Or were you intending the variable definitions to be upper case and all the references lower case? It's not real clear what the intended style is, and I have to say that I thought Neil was heading in the intended direction also. regards, tom lane

Re: [PATCHES] minor documentation improvements

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
this one yet. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [PATCHES] IPV4 addresses on IPV6 machines in pg_hba.conf

2003-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would you like me to conditionally add the IPv6 line to pg_hba.conf from > initdb now? I was going to tackle that tomorrow, but if you wanna do it, go for it. regards, tom lane ---(end

Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

2003-09-06 Thread Tom Lane
ikely to work when building outside the source tree. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

2003-09-06 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > but top_srcdir isn't defined at this point. Perhaps $srcdir? Peter would probably know what to use. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/r

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >