ons = 165
shared_buffers = 32768
sort_mem = 20480
vacuum_mem = 16384
effective_cache_size = 256900
I still in doubt whether this figture is optimized and putting more ram will
help the system throughtput.
Any idea please . My organization is one oof the big hospital in Thailand
Thanks
Amrit
shared_buffers = 2048[Total = 2.5 Gb.]
sort_mem = 8192 [Total = 1280 Mb.]
vacuum_mem = 16384
effective_cache_size = 128897 [= 1007 Mb. = 1 Gb. ]
Will it be more suitable for my server than before?
Thanks for all comment.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)
> The common wisdom of shared buffers is around 6-10% of available memory.
> Your proposal below is about 50% of memory.
>
> I'm not sure what the original numbers actually meant, they are quite large.
>
I will try to reduce shared buffer to 1536 [1.87 Mb].
> also effective cache is the sum of ker
celing any
> gain from freeing up more memory. So there is a need to understand what
> sort of workload you have!
Will the increasing in effective cache size to arround 20 make a little bit
improvement ? Do you think so?
Any comment please , thanks.
Amrit
Thailand
---
; >
> I would leave it at the figure you proposed (128897), and monitor your
> performance.
> (you can always increase it later and see what the effect is).
Yes , I use this figure.
If the result still poor , putting more ram "6-8Gb" [also putting more m
RH 9.0 , if I enable both of the log [pid , duration] , where could
I look for the result of the log, and would it make the system to be slower?
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
it make any differnce between open and
close the hyperthreading?
Thanks for any comment
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
be adjustment the query , right.
> Feel free to ask for assistence on irc at irc.freenode.net #postgresql.
> People there help optimise queries all day ;-).
How could I contact with those people ;=> which url ?
Thanks again.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)
of the table [8 million records which I think not too much]
.When I turned this query off everything went fine.
I don't know whether update the data is much slower than insert [Postgresql
7.3.2] and how could we improve the update method?
Thanks for many helps.
Amrit
Thailand
NB. I would like
> I guess the problem with huge updates is that
> until the update is finished, the new tuples are
> not visible, so the old cannot be freed...
Yes, very good point I must try this and I will give you the result , thanks a
lot.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
I use RH 9.0 with postgresql 7.3.2 and 4 Gb ram [server spec. Dual Xeon 3.0]
and someone mention that the hyperthreading will not help but if I let it there
will it be any harm to the system?
Any comment please.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast
Gb.ram] .May I
use FC 2 [which is freely downloaded] with 6 Gb. and PGsql 7.4 ?
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
not written by themselve.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
stgres and leave a huge chunk to the OS cache, this means you are
> already hitting the PAE penalty at 1.5GB of memory.
>
How could I chang this hitting?
Thanks
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
> Upgrade to 64-bit processors + 64-bit linux.
Does the PAE help linux in handling the memory of more than 4 Gb limit in 32 bit
archetech ? My intel server board could handle the mem of 12 Gb [according to
intel spec.] and if I use Fedora C2 with PAE , will it useless for mem o
rpm FC 2-3 with a newly install server , would it automatically
detect and config it if I use the mechine with > 4 Gb [6Gb.] or should I
manually config it?
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please s
whether the PAE [physical address ext.] will be put in place and could
I use the RAM for more than 4 Gb. Does any one have different idea ? Since
upgrade to Operon 64 Bit needs a lot of money , I may postpone it for a couple
while.
Any comment ,please.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end
uffer = 32384
sort_mem = 34025<= I guess increase this one is most effective but too
high cause reading the swap , is that right?
effective cache = 153204
My server has 4 Gb. ram and ~ 140 clients in rush hours.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of b
jp/~mitani/jpug/pgcluster/en/index.html
and you may directly contact him.
Amrit
Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
select relname, relacl from pg_class where (relkind = 'r' OR relkind = 'S') and
relname !~ '^pg_' order by relname : Unknown DBI error
What is the cause of this error and how could I handle this order?
Please make any comment, Thanks.
Amrit , Thailand
d it
> (you may need to rebuild DBD-Pg, telling it where your Pg install is).
>
> regards
>
> Mark
>
I installed FC3 from rpm kernel 2.6.9 which already included postgresql 7.4.5 .
Suppose that there were some missing component , what should be the missing rpm
component which I for
DBI:Pg:dbname=template1;port=5432:
And my pg_hba.conf is
# IPv4-style local connections:
hostall all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust
hostall all 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 trust
trusted for every user.
Would you give me an idea what's wrong?
Thanks .
Amrit,Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
c
postgresql-contrib-7.4.5-3.1.tlc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
no other pg installation except the pgsql for windows in samba folder which I
think it isn't matter ,is it?
No other pg being run.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ps ax|grep postmaster
2228 ?S 0:00 /usr/bin/postmaster -p 5432 -D /var/lib/
there is a check
box for
Use DBI to connect if available?yes nothe default is
yes , but if I choosed no everything went fine.
I also test it in the desktop mechine and get the same error and the same
solution. Could you explain what happen to the FC3 + po
at in mysql there is a command "last_record_id" which acts the same as
I mention above. Does anybody know that , please give me the detail?
Amrit,Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
1. How should I adjust my new configuration to improve the performance ?
2. And should I set autovaccum = on and if it is on what is the other proper
parameter to be set?
Thank a lot for your help.....
Amrit Angsusingh
Thailand
= 212
1. How should I adjust my new configuration to improve the performance ?
2. And should I set autovaccum = on and if it is on what is the other proper
parameter to be set?
Thank a lot for your help.....
Amrit Angsusingh
Thailand
ations = 0
Please give me any comment about adjustment my mechine.
Amrit Angsusingh
nakornsawan , Thailand
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
28 matches
Mail list logo