Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 17 May 2018, at 12:59, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > > 2018-05-17 13:00 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker >: > >> I really wonder if this is the same as breakpoint. E.g. it only applies to >> the whole method, it is

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

2018-05-17 13:00 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker : > > I really wonder if this is the same as breakpoint. E.g. it only applies to >> the whole method, it is not an “action”, so a guter icon >> seems to be not the right visualization. >> > > Hm, I would like to see indication in

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

You guys are awesome! Sent from my iPhone > On 17 May 2018, at 11:01, Marcus Denker wrote: > >>> >>> To me the fact that it uses a meta-link is purely an implementation >>> artefact, other than for breakpoints, watchpoints, where we annotate >>> the AST with actions…

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> > To me the fact that it uses a meta-link is purely an implementation artefact, > other than for breakpoints, watchpoints, where we annotate > the AST with actions… > > I only speak about management implementation. The way how registries of > breakpoints and watchpoints are maintained and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 17 May 2018, at 11:46, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > > 2018-05-17 10:53 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker >: > On 16 May 2018, at 18:21, Denis Kudriashov > wrote: >>

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

2018-05-17 10:53 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker : > On 16 May 2018, at 18:21, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > > Hi Marcus. > I commented on github. > > 2018-05-16 18:34 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker : > >> >> >> > On 4 Apr 2018, at 18:02,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

2018-05-17 10:53 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker : > On 16 May 2018, at 18:21, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > > Hi Marcus. > I commented on github. > > 2018-05-16 18:34 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker : > >> >> >> > On 4 Apr 2018, at 18:02,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 16 May 2018, at 18:21, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > Hi Marcus. > I commented on github. > > 2018-05-16 18:34 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker >: > > > > On 4 Apr 2018, at 18:02, Marcus Denker

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

Hi Marcus. I commented on github. 2018-05-16 18:34 GMT+03:00 Marcus Denker : > > > > On 4 Apr 2018, at 18:02, Marcus Denker wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Some code is very “active”, executed all the time, e.g. collections, > graphics… or imagine if

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 4 Apr 2018, at 18:02, Marcus Denker wrote: > > Hi, > > Some code is very “active”, executed all the time, e.g. collections, > graphics… or imagine if you work on the compiler or debugger. > > It would really be nice if we could test a change before accepting it.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

you should use that as an example in the reflectivity paper. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > Hi, > > Some code is very “active”, executed all the time, e.g. collections, > graphics… or imagine if you work on the compiler or debugger. > > It would

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 5. Apr 2018, at 08:31, Marcus Denker wrote: > > > And it leads immediately (at least for me) that I start to get lots of ideas… > > so now we accept a single method for test. > > Why not… (random ideas) nice! Do we have this for collecting testcases and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 5 Apr 2018, at 09:09, Marcus Denker wrote: > > > >> On 4 Apr 2018, at 21:50, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >> Very cool. Impressive combination of unique Pharo features. >> > > It shows, too, that “doing an experiment on top” and then writing

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 4 Apr 2018, at 21:50, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > Very cool. Impressive combination of unique Pharo features. > It shows, too, that “doing an experiment on top” and then writing a paper is one thing, but that true progress happens if you can actually integrate the

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

> On 4 Apr 2018, at 22:41, Nicolas Cellier > wrote: > > Yes this is cool. > I was wondering what if you try and modify the Meta-Link architecture itself, > but my brain did not reach this second meta level... > for now all Links are ignored that are put

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

Yes this is cool. I was wondering what if you try and modify the Meta-Link architecture itself, but my brain did not reach this second meta level... 2018-04-04 21:50 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe : > Very cool. Impressive combination of unique Pharo features. > > > On 4 Apr 2018,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Idea and proof of concept: Accept for Test

Very cool. Impressive combination of unique Pharo features. > On 4 Apr 2018, at 18:02, Marcus Denker wrote: > > Hi, > > Some code is very “active”, executed all the time, e.g. collections, > graphics… or imagine if you work on the compiler or debugger. > > It would