On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
[Fri Mar 16 09:42:37 2001] [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting to
Ehem. Did you try to 'apachectl stop ; apachectl start' ??
I've seen odd things to happen if 'apachectl restart' is used.
--Jani
restart
[Fri Mar 16 09:42:38 2001] [notice]
On 20 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: windows NT
PHP version: 4.0.4pl1
PHP Bug Type: Dynamic loading
Bug description: In php.ini file.Enabled the ldap utility by removing the semicolon
In php.ini file.Enabled the ldap utility by
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I couldn't find any indication that this can break any of the other sapi
builds so I don't think there's a problem with adding it.
Okay. But still I find it very annoying that we don't follow the
rules we have created. Just for the record. :)
And I hope
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
his new code. In my opinion, the CVS rules should be changed to reflect
that, just to make Jani happy, or we'd stay outlaws in his mind forever :)
:)
--Jani
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
PEAR will be separate at some point, but let's not go overboard here. The
midgard stuff adds a total of 76K to the tar.gz file. Big deal.
I was talking in general, not only midgard. The pear stuff takes
a lot more than 76k..and this has been pushed
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Fredrik Ohrn wrote:
But how about extending the bug tracker to allow independent comments?
I think it would cut down on duplicate bug entries and increase the
possibilities for feedback.
We're working on a new bug system..
Ofcourse it opens up for a flood of useless "ME
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, yavo wrote:
On several occasions I had to install php with oci8 on redhat Linux (6.2)
with different versions of apache 1.12 - 1.17 with Oracle 8.1.6 client .
Every single time I get the same thing. Apache shows no errors, the apache
start script shows no errors but dies
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, John Stoops wrote:
Lets start again.
My php page:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
html
head
titleUntitled/title
/head
body
?php
echo "Hello world";
?
/body
/html
My error message:
PHP Warning: Unable to load dynamic library
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Jason Gan wrote:
Hi Sniper:
Actually I was posting two different cases of possibly the same bug.
One bug, one report. Add the other example into the other report you
posted.
--Jani
One case is passing String value to a static variable in the COM object.
The other is
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
JT Uhm..I have always closed the duplicates after the original (which they
JT refer to) was closed. Any opinions about this? As the current bug system
I thought "Duplicate" itself is a closed status. Like, work continues on
the original and the
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
Now, it's Sunday morning, I just crawled out of my nice warm bed, and
I haven't finished my first cup of bad coffee yet--but if
Have that cup of coffee first.. :)
Duplicate == Repeated information, and
Repeated Information == Useless Bug
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I just came across something very odd:
After setting
arg_separator = "amp;"
in my php.ini Tobias Ratschiller's phpMyAdmin no longer works
correctly.
The start
Uhm..I have always closed the duplicates after the original (which they
refer to) was closed. Any opinions about this? As the current bug system
doesn't have any support for 'multiple' closing, I think it's better to
close bugs after they are fixed, be it a duplicate or not.
--Jani
On 9 Mar
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Andr Langhorst wrote:
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Uhm..I have always closed the duplicates after the original (which they
refer to) was closed. Any opinions about this? As the current bug system
doesn't have any support for 'multiple' closing, I think it's better to
close bugs
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Your old website was simply one of the most beautiful and elegant
combinations of PHP and very nice page design I've ever seen! I used to
use it as an example in talks and instruction on HTML design. Alas, it
is no more. While you've possibly packed
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 22:33 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Why not bzip2_?
*** Well, if bzip2_, then gzip_ !
I'd prefer these. Readable is better than saving 2-3 keystrokes.
--Jani
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
My thoughts exactly! I hate that new look. It's..depressing!
I must have missed some discussion about the new web design?
And when was it decided (and by WHO?!) that this new design is ok?
e.g. The font
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote:
Oh? Have you installed some truetype support? As for me the fonts
are way too small and some look like lego-blocks. :)
Can you too look again? At least look at http://ca.php.net (which I
can update instantly).
Well, it's better now. At least I can
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote:
But the h2 / h3 / h1 elements look like lego-blocks for me. :)
This must be caused by the fact that I don't have Arial font in my
system..using the defaults fonts (overriding the document specified)
'fixes' this. Why not use 'Verdana' ? It's more
FYI, if you leave the textbox empty and only change the bug type,
there won't be any emails sent to anyone. So if you want to just
reclassify, only change the bug type. I changed it because I didn't
want to spam the php-dev list all the time when just reorganizing reports.
--Jani
On 6 Mar
Try the latest CVS snapshot from http://snaps.php.net/
as this is already taken care of. And 4.0.5 will have the
fixed version.
--Jani
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
Hi all!
My company is in the process of changing all HTML pages we work on to
conform to XHTML. This can be
ROFL
Thank you very much for bringing some joy to my day (night) ;)
--Jani
p.s. I bet this guy who submitted the report won't submit any
reports ever.. :)
On 5 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 9519
Updated by: mrobinso
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old-Status: Open
Status: Bogus
Bug
Is this problem solved? And if not, does your Apache work without PHP?
And what exactly did those patches update??
--Jani
On 8 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 8186
User Update by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old-Status: Feedback
Status: Open
Bug Type: Reproduceable crash
Description: PHP4 module
yourself. From glibc.
--Jani
thanks,
Sherman
-Original Message-
From: Jani Taskinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2001 2:26 AM
To: Sherman Chan
Cc: 'Bug Database'
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: PHP 4.0 Bug #9003 Updated: mod_ssl +
php4.0.4pl1 crash
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Boian Bonev wrote:
Are you sure you're using the php4.0.4pl1 source tarball from
www.php.net??
I just checked that file and it doesn't have any #line directives in it.
look in url_scanner_ex.c not in url_scanner_ex.re. at least in latest cvs
there are #line-s. my gcc does
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Boian Bonev wrote:
Maybe this should be mentioned at http://bugs.php.net/anoncvs.php page?
(why would some non-developer get his PHP 4 from CVS anyway? :)
there is at least one reason - to compile with a new feature that is not
released still. it is not recommended but i
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Sherman Chan wrote:
if there is nothing to do with php, could you tell me why the apache + php +
mod_ssl fail to start, but apache + mod_ssl starts up ok. also the same
configuration with php3 works ok as well. could u provide soe idea where I
should look at, like the
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
arg_separator = "amp;"
things break because someone was dumb and used the "arg_separator" that
used to be used to handle parsing the incoming request to also handle the
parsing that the session-id adding stuff does, and then changed the
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Stig Venaas wrote:
Well, I think it's just the link order of libraries. ie. the
openssl lib should be before libc..but is that even possible?
Or just add another entry for libc after ssl?
Might be possible to do some kludge with the link order, I would prefer
that
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Phil Steinke wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:24:46PM +0800, Jacky Chou wrote:
I was compiling PHP 4.0.4pl1 with Zeus in Solaris 8 Sparc system but I got an error:
zend_operators.h:84: implicit declaration of function `int finite(...)'
This appears to be a problem with
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
I do like Hellekin's suggestion to use procmail to automate the entry of
messages into the bug system - however, I have no idea how reliabile the
system is or how much effort is needed to implement it.
--zak
*** I'll have an eye on
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Mike Nerone wrote:
Well, it still happens with the latest release. I don't have an extra
non-production machine on which to try a cvs snapshot.
Ok. Then wait for next release and if this happens with it too,
reopen the bug report.
--Jani
Mike Nerone mailto:[EMAIL
On 29 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 8932
User Update by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Open
Bug Type: Date/time related
Description: gettimeofday improvement suggestion
I have a solution for this now, also for microtime
and usleep. How can I get the code to appropriate
place ??
Just send a
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Ferdinand, Dieter wrote:
hello,
i dont know, why i get this error, but when i insert this lines in snmp.c,
then i can compile php with snmp.
What is the version of UCD-snmp you have in your system?
And where is it installed? snmp.c does include default_store.h
IF it is
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
unless someone hollers, i'm going to change the bug reports slightly --
i'm going to remove the "PHP 4.0" from the front, make it look like "Re:
Bug #1234" instead of "Bug #1234 Updated", and try be a little creative
with message-ids and
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, David Eriksson wrote:
BTW. Why does the satellite extension use --enable-satellite??
It does use external libraries which are not bundled with PHP.
IIRC the --enable-* configure option is meant to be used only
with such extensions?? (and satellite relies on some CVS version
On 19 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: Linux Mdk 6.1
PHP version: 4.0.4pl1
PHP Bug Type: Apache related
Bug description: httpd could not be started
Under Linux Mdk 6.1
I have :
apache 1.3.12
Php 3.0.16
MySql 3.22.32 (source)
And
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, matthew zhang wrote:
It does not work. I have been using pdf_stringwidth function. This one is
working and we have almost finished our program
And you didn't explain HOW exactly it didn't work?
I tried the example code you sent and it worked just fine.
The line width was
Test script:
?php session_start(); ?
Here's the backtrace:
(gdb) run -X
Starting program: /www/apache/bin/httpd -X
[New Thread 1024 (runnable)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (runnable)]
0x40634c86 in url_adapt_ext_ex (src=0x81756e4 "",
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Sam Liddicott wrote:
Could Solaris users please make me the output of:
grep HAVE_FLOCK main/php_config.h
--
# uname -a
SunOS phys-staff2 5.6 Generic_105181-23 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
# grep HAVE_FLOCK main/php_config.h
/* #undef HAVE_FLOCK */
--
# uname -a
SunOS
This is not good..I don't have time to try to reproduce
this. Is there some limit how long the include path can be?
--Jani
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 18:02:02 -0700
From: John Masterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Mark Olbert wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libphp4.so: undefined versioned symbol name
__fp_query@@GLIBC_2.0
/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value
Either your header files don't match the installed GLIBC version or
libresolv.so.1 was compiled against a
501 - 542 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
