Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
How about you read Zeev's excellent explanation of this issue in
Message-Id: 5.1.0.14.2.20021003111648.05550388@localhost?
Zeev may forgot some or misunderstood my patches.
I have to take a look at SAPI code. IIRC it has been
changed a little to work around
snip
(Do we have HOWTO for getting backtrace from Windows?)
No we don't because its quite complex although we could make it easier.
If we were to build PHP with symbols enabled and perhaps also provide
.pdg and .dbg files (we would have to make sure we always build in
c:\php4 or some such) then
In general I agree with this proposal but I have some concerns, as I am
not familiar with the ini code these may be unfounded, introducing it
may well
1) Introduce Security Concerns depending on the time the ini file is
loaded (IF I have safe_mode = on then you include an ini file with
At 06:16 PM 4/3/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And w32api is in PECL CVS btw.
What exactly does this mean, considering it's also in php4/ext/w32api?
My thoughts exactly..
James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Yes and yes...
At 01:24 AM 4/3/2002, Ilia A. wrote:
Hello,
Are the W32api functions in the CVS will make it into the upcoming 4.2
release and if so will they be a part of the standard binaries distributed
for windows?
Ive just rewritten these but havnt put them into CVS yet.. it uses OO and
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 06:16, Joey Smith wrote:
On Saturday, Jan. 26th, at 11:36am MST my son, Joseph Clark Smith,
Jr. was born. He is 19.5 in length and 7 lbs. 5 oz.
More pictures later, but here's on to start with:
http://www.joeysmith.com/~joey/jj.jpg
Congratulations! May you
Jim Winstead wrote:
no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what
happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no
longer a part of the core distribution.
QA too.
I suppose removing some of these less frequently used extensions will
also help
need for storage). absolutely *no* reasonable programmer will ever use
PHP to calculate prime numbers or fractals (maybe with mathematical
extensions, but not with raw PHP code).
Hey I have a little PHP-GTK app that does simple fractals... whats wrong
with that??? :P
- James
--
PHP
I have written an extension to php for the MCVE engine. It can be
loaded as a module or compiled into the code base, and would like to
have it distributed with PHP. I would need commit access in order to
maintain the module. The product, MCVE is a credit card processing
engine
I don't think you should be apologizing. Nobdoy should.
Anyways, I'm now really going 'away' for a while too and
not stir this soup anymore. I hope that some people here
stop and think a bit what is wrong here as it's quite
obvious that something definately needs to be changed.
And I
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
I suggest ext/template being extemely important.
Sorry, but I am completely against it.
+1, the only exception I might make would be Smarty as it is well designed
and a lot of people use it but I dont think even smarty has a place in the
PHP
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
It should be self-evident that most things are IMHO.
So I don't see the reason why you're trying to make a
problem out of that.
One thing I try to avoid is making assumptions, because most of the
world's problems come from that.
As my old man
Just imagine having to explain the confusion with the 4.1.0 release to
everyone... oh my ;)
The real 4.1.0 release will have zend version number 1.1.0a (while the
old, bogus one has 1.1.0 as Zend version number).
Woth putting a note about this on the bug pages and php.net when we
since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it
make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :)
Why?? Yes 4.1.0 was leaked on php-general and php-homepage.de but both were
replied to making it very clear 4.1.0 hasnt been released yet. calling
4.1.0pl1 or 4.1.1
How about in future to avoid this happening when we roll the release tag as
4.1.0 or whatever call the tar.gz file php-4.1.0pre1.tar.gz then it becomes
slightly more obvious its not 4.1.0 also all we then have to do is rename
php-4.1.0pre1 to php-4.1.0.tar.gz to do the release no need to reroll
Did you check the 4.1.0 Zeev packaged? It was supposed to be backed out. I
don't have time to check now.
Still present in this package. Similar script as brian:
F:\PHP-41~1.0\RELEAS~2php -q test.php
hibr
bFatal error/b: Cannot redeclare test() in
bF:\PHP-41~1.0\RELEAS~2\include.php/b on
Although my vote doesn't count much here :-) I'm for it...
... but it would be a problem for 4.x I guess because this
horribly breaks BC when/if there's a new 4.x release and
people start using it.
But it would be nice to have it in ZE2.
my 2c - Markus
Its
Q: What about DocBook?
A: I don't have the neccessary knowledge for this, but I know some guys
that actually have it. Means, I've send some pizza's and beer crates to
send to them and make them feel guilty to help us ;). Help is very much
appreciated.
What needs doing on this front??
-
James Moore wrote:
Q: What about DocBook?
A: I don't have the neccessary knowledge for this, but I know some
guys
that actually have it. Means, I've send some pizza's and beer crates
to
send to them and make them feel guilty to help us ;). Help is very
much
appreciated
But in C, you can #if 0 whole blocks out regardless. I'm in favour of a
change like this (if not this specific one) in 4.2.
if(0) {
}
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Yea, that's the problem. In my application, just loading the class files
on each page adds quite a bit of overhead. (1000's of lines of code).
Only load what you need then :) Or rewrite in C.
I've taken a look through the PHP/Zend source and it looks to me like it
would be possible to
CCVS has now been dropped by redhat (it will be
replaced by MCVE), the module doesnt really seem to be supported either. With
sablotron going the same way (for different reasons though) perhaps we should
create a unsupported or and old directory in the pear c extension repository for
these
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:32:49 -, James Moore wrote:
CCVS has now been dropped by redhat (it will be replaced by MCVE),
the module doesnt really seem to be supported either. With sablotron
going the same way (for different reasons though) perhaps we should
create a unsupported or and old
- Original Message -
From: Zak Greant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PHP Quality Assurance Team Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PHP
Developers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 9:23 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: File Uploads in the PHP
Win32 Builds, Apache, IIS, CGI work, Apache2 doesnt but works in latest CVS
(segfaults on requests but thats a minor fix.) All modules Ive built and
tested work (that is the major ones).
- James
- Original Message -
From: Zak Greant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED];
On November 21, 2001 06:55 am, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I think we should be testing the pre-compiled binaries which will
later on become the release for win32 platforms. As we have seen many
times before, there have been build-problems in the release which
were not caught by tests. Whoever
I'm all for testing windows builds, especially if anyone wants to chuck
the Sablatron extension my way as well.
Karl
ext/sablatron is no longer existant, you need to port to ext/xslt instead.
(Perhaps we should write a wrapper libaray to help people who are using
ext/sablatron for now..
If it's any use to you, I bought a licence for Wise Install Builder solely
for the purpose of building the PHP windows installation stuff. I chose
the
Wise software because it seemed significantly more capable than the
InstallShield stuff. Anyway, since it was bought for the job, I'd be more
- Original Message -
From: Alain Samoun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Zak Greant [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andy
Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21
I just reuploaded another copy try now.
- James
- Original Message -
From: Alain Samoun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: James Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zak Greant [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jani
Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andy Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED
James Moore wrote:
It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone
had it working on win32 yet??
AFAICS, there is no (working) workspace in the PHP_4_0_7 branch to
build the sapi/Apache2Filter for Win32.
I can build it (I just made a new workspace
At 10:23 20.11.2001 +, James Moore wrote:
James Moore wrote:
It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has
anyone
had it working on win32 yet??
AFAICS, there is no (working) workspace in the PHP_4_0_7 branch to
build the sapi/Apache2Filter
www.php.net/~zeev/php-4.1.0RC3.tar.gz
Lets get this bitch out the window :) Release on thurs if nothing else big
comes up?
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact
Can you please build the sapi for Apache2?
thanks
-Jobarr
It wont load for me.. might but my build or something else.. has anyone had
it working on win32 yet??
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
could this be similar to the engine=on/engine=off thing that we had quite a
while ago?? Or is it due to global rather than local settings being
overridden in set_time_limit?
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
shouldnt it be file_md5 if we are sticking with out namespace convention.
- James
- Original Message -
From: Chris Newbill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PHP DEV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:57 AM
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] md5sum() patch
Nahh I think md5_file() isn't very
!==
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i haven't really changed my mind - but i want a fast
decision. as there isn't any clear consens here i think we
should release 4.1 as-it-is-with-the-last-showstoppers-fixed
and go from there. we should also learn from this and assign
a RM for the next release! i mean a
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, James Moore wrote:
Putting out a release we arnt happy with is worse than not putting a
release
out at all.
Just wondering what in the current branch people aren't happy with.
Its too old, things are being merged in still which could work find in HEAD
but could have
The one symptom Rasmus pointed out (which was quite specific for
mbstring-xlation+zlib-compression) was MFH'd, so I think there are no big
showstoppers left.
Ive a fix for strtok's behaviour in HEAD but not in 4_0_7 should I merge
it?? (See news for details of the fix).
- James
--
PHP
I suggest an RC2 (today?) and a release by the end of the week, or Monday
at the latest.
James - how sure are you that the fix you submitted is good and that we
won't find out afterwards that the bogus behavior was actually the right
thing to do? :)
Well I know the old behaviour was wrong,
But should it return:
$str = array(
string = James
string = Zeev
string =
string = Andrei
)
Enduser point of view ;). IMO Should return en empty string (it is an
empty string) or NULL, but false has nothing to do
We have a bit of a dilemma here. As you all know, the 4.0.7 branch, on
which 4.1.0 is currently scheduled to be based on, has branched away a
few
months ago. Some people have expressed concern that releasing 4.1.0
based
on that branch is not a good idea, because there have been so many
If you can humor me for the moment and make the assumption that it would
be something the PHP developer group thinks is a valuable addition, is it
mostly a matter of the developers on this list deciding it should be
added? Or is there a more formal process? Should I be addressing email
Still readable without problems to me ;)
The syntax is ugly -10 from me :)
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL
we were going to set up [EMAIL PROTECTED] at one point with a closed list of
recieptients.. mainly core devs and a few QA People who can check out if it
is a security problem or not.
Dont think this ever happen. Perhaps it would be an idea though
- James
- Original Message -
From:
Anyone feel the need to reply to this??
- James
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:59 PM
Subject: results of semi-automatic source code audit
/*
* results of semi-automatic source code audit of a
* majority of php
I want to pass value to only one or more but not to all params. Also this
will make the code clearer I think.
Comments are welcome!
This is somthing that has been discussed as a probable feature in PHP 5 but
for now you could pass an assoc. array to get round the problem.
- James
--
PHP
Hi! I request karma for module phpweb. Am working with jmcastagnetto on
user notes where Voting and User Moderation will be implemented. And
will most likely find other things to do, albeit nothing major (yet?).
Colin has already done this with the PHP-GTK Manual.
- James
--
PHP
Perhaps the php-doc guys can set up the basics (I don't have
time to become a doc guru) so that we at least have somewhere
to put it, and that might encourage people to write some docs.
Also, whenever a new API comes along (like zend_parse_parameters)
it could be put in there from the
Kinda like the FSF assignment. This is so that we can publish these docs
in books free of charge, without having to run after everybody who
contributed. Don't worry, we don't get a nickel out of it.
I dunno what its under now but the Open Documentation License is nice as
then main
Hi guys,
This list seems to get a fair amount of spam. Any chance of blocking posts
from non-subscribers. Sure, it would upset the one-time posters, but
surely its not too hard for them to subscribe and unsubscribe.
Gavin
This isnt an option, please see the archives for previous
Just to add my few £0.02 to this discussion :)
_() just doesnt make sense to anyone who hasnt used gettext() which tbh is
probably the vast majority of the comunity, I have seen _ in the function
lists and Zend and Harmuts site and just thought it was a querk somewhere..
_() to me looks like
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:48:52AM +0200, Alexander Jäger wrote :
i wanted to do a waiting function and read on php.net, that usleep does
not
work under windows. so i did my own function and got problems with
microtime
and gettimeofday
does anybody has expiriences that these doesn't work
- Original Message -
From: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: --- @zend.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] python dictionary-like % (percent) substitution in
php (was: Good idea in % (percent) substitutions in string)
I think
If I find bugs that are open, but are fixed, or bogus or whatever, should
I
report them somewhere?
Yep.. send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], he will be pleased to recieve them :)
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Whoa, an interesting read.
Does this mean you wont be pushing for PHP to be LGPL'd then??
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail:
Ive written one or two before, mainly for the release process (I think
its
in CVS under README.realease_process or somthing like that). Id suggest
people just get on and write them and post them to php-dev where people
generally read them and make comments. I dont see what there is to
On the other hand, the latter one could be named 'RFC process', since it
hasn't yet been defined what the heck it is precisely...
RFC.. Request For Comments, its as simple as that someone posts a document
outlining what they want changed/want to do, calls it an RFC and is
litterally making a
The work on Zend Engine 2 has now started, _without_ a proper definition
of
it. IMHO, that's not the ideal situation, since this could lead to strange
inconsequences, because the precise behaviour is decided during
implementation.
Umm what about the white paper that was prepaired before
anychance of writing your complex functions in C? then you can do exectly
what you want.
- James
- Original Message -
From: Howie Oakes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP in a Hyper-secure
a) Is there a faster way to send data between 2 processes,
that will work with PHP, and is supported by Windows and *nix.
How about abstacting it, under Linux use shared mem (should be fastest)
if its avalible, other wise use sockets then If that's not avalible use
database/file version.
-
Works perfect for me with IIS5/win2k but becareful of which extensions
you use, a lot of extensions are STILL not threadsafe.
- James
-Original Message-
From: Phil Driscoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 June 2001 11:02
To: Liz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Something along this line which I wanted to do was to turn the time out
off for interactive mode as at the moment it times out after 30secs,
anyone got any objections if I make that change??
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. There is nothing specific in there about compiling the
code under windows. Brian
Oh I must be dreaming then when I looked at
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install-windows.php#install.windows.build..
Supprising what you imagine isnt it?? :)
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List
ID: 7387
Updated by: jeroen
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Assigned
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating system:
PHP Version: 4 (any)
Assigned To: jeroen
Comments:
Jeroen,
Generally when a bug is assigned to someone and you want to work on it
then its polite to send
David,
Can you please grab the latest CVS and check if it fixes your
problems. If
it does I think it can be merged into 4.0.6.
David,
Generally wed be appreciative if someone with AIX would think about
joining the PHP QA Team to ensure future versions of PHP also run on the
platform
Well, there is no CVS standard, but rather a standard in the
CODING_GUIDELINES file. However, in this case, I think you can
disregard that, since the function is so similiar (in nature) to the
diskfreespace() function that disktotalspace() makes the most sense,
instead of
How do you feel about renaming the existing diskfreespace()
function to disk_free_space() (with an alias for backwards
compatibility)?
A warm fuzzy feeling :) Seriously though, it's been discussed in
great length, and at least from what I understood, going in that
direction
Hmm WTF where did that come from??
- James
-Original Message-
From: Andrei Zmievski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 May 2001 17:18
To: PHP Developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NEWS line
What's this NEWS line for?
- Ported Documentation structure from phpdoc. (James
Zak,
I suggest that one of the QA Team Members signs up for an account,
preferably someone who has a decent amount of experiance of debugging on
Linux we could then use the system to verify bugs/run RC tests on the
server. Any of the QA Team Members/Developers willing to be responsible for
this?
You're not wrong; It's been done and published
(http://www.zend.com/apidoc/), and is the base for additional work
that I invited people to improve on.
Hey, are the sources for this manual available somewhere? CVS maybe?
Yep, sure thing; cvs.zend.com, co ZendAPI; Released under
There's a good starting point already, people are more than welcome to
extend it.
I don't understand why people should work in their spare-time
on a tool which is published under the Zend Licence (which is
similar to QPL). As we know of QPL, all developer's seem to
be equal, but some
* James Moore wrote:
And the point of this other than trying to start a flame war was Bjorn?
I'm not starting a flame war.
I just didnt understand what your comments possibly had to do with the Zend
API docs. AFIAK they arnt QPL'd (and if they are it doesnt really matter
although
What's the status of the show stoppers list James put up? We
should fix as
many bugs as we can (at least those which are planned to be fixed
in 4.0.6)
before branching, to avoid having to synchronize two branches for
every bug
fix.
Ill go through tonight and update list and post
What's the status of the show stoppers list James put up? We
should fix as
many bugs as we can (at least those which are planned to be fixed
in 4.0.6)
before branching, to avoid having to synchronize two branches for
every bug
fix.
Ill go through tonight and update list
At 04:22 PM 5/2/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I don't see any unusual peak now; We have tons of bug reports all the
time. IMHO our problem is no longer lack of QA, but lack of developer
resources to fix bugs.
I truly think that making RCs effective releases gains nothing. If
everyone
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think it's enough to announce it on the PHP mailing list
with a short
explanation of what RC means. We don't want the whole world
to download
the RC.
i would like to spread the news as far as possible
Let's take it one step at a time. We should have an RC1
Seriously though, win32 is particular hard to do automated testing.
Maybe we could use cygwin for running the test-suite under win32 and at
least be able to use standard *nix tools?
It already does run under windows.
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
I would be very against this.. to me it seems silly, the current QA Team
will have to spend 90% of their time running through the (maybe
hundreds) of
reports rather than testing. It makes more sense to me to try and attract
more people who know what they are doing to the QA Team rather
there are no com tests but I did play with it for Liz with RC3 or 4 for a
while and it worked then. (I bet its that god damn COM diff that phanto made
I thought he said he had tested it.. I havnt had time to yet but will build
and test tonight.
- James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Can you please look at the patch in bug http://www.php.net/bugs.php?id=10563
and commit it if its needed/comment on the bug.
thanks
- James
--
James Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.perl.com/search/index.php - we must be doing somthing right
--
PHP Development Mailing List http
This seems definiatly to be the case.. (I would build one but on a 56k its
going to take a few hours before its upthere)
- James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2001 23:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10567: Your
Can we get it to stop listing bogus reports too. THat will drop the size by
a large amount.
- James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jani Taskinen
Sent: 29 April 2001 08:48
To: Andrei Zmievski
Cc: Derick Rethans; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
K the fix seems to have worked for me too I cant reproduce this any more.
- James
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 April 2001 08:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] STOP PRODUCTION
Please try the latest Zend CVS.
Also, if
In order to avoid this you actually have to call it at completely
different
times, something you can't really guarantee. We should
probably not use
the timestamp as the seed (at least not alone), but also take
the pid into
account.
Zeev
That only really works for
Guys,
I think that despite the release of 4.0.5 tomorrow we are pretty close to
having an RC1 for 4.0.6. Lots of things have been fixed/added since 4.0.5
(check the NEWS file).
Can we make a list of things which still need to make it into
4.0.6 before
we branch?
Andi
K I have a list
the php.exe gives an error parsing the newest browscap.ini file Ill look
into that.
- James
-Original Message-
From: Liz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 April 2001 18:30
To: Bug Database
Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still segments
Yeah, I noticed
this?
- James
-Original Message-
From: James Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 April 2001 18:46
To: Liz
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still
segments
the php.exe gives an error parsing the newest browscap.ini file Ill look
than
just having ini_error being called..
- James
-Original Message-
From: Sean R. Bright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 April 2001 19:04
To: 'James Moore'; 'Liz'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #4787 Updated: get_browser() still
segments
This seems like
Its doesnt at all :) We are using it as a temporary codename until we can
think of a better one.
- James
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 April 2001 18:42
To: James Moore
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.0.5: Merge
The QA process as it is IS a joke. Without the support from the developers
there aren't any possible ways that it can ever succeed.
It isn't the QA people who fix bugs. They just test and report to
developers
who should FIX those bugs. Some core developers seem to have forget this..
I can
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated,
Please dont cross post like this these questions should be sent to
php-general. I just got three copies of this in my mailbox which isnt really
necessary now is it?
- James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ID: 8722
Updated by: jmoore
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old-Status: Open
Status: Assigned
Bug Type: Sockets related
PHP Version: 4.0.4pl1
Assigned To: jmoore
Comments:
Ill test the patch and commit if it works well. It looks right to me.
james, this should be done in
Stig Bakken wrote:
Log:
here's a preliminary list of stuff for 4.1
Is there any timeframe for when PHP 4.1.0 will be released?
PS: When will PHP 4.0.5 be released? :)
Well im not happy with the current state of some bugs in HTTP_AUTH section
and waiting for a reply from Rasmus
Hi!
Is there some policy about the inclusion of newly added modules to RC's?
I'ld like to see the dbx module in the 4.0.5 release...
Cheerio, Marc.
I dont think any new code should be added to the Release branch now,
although this is a contentious issue but I think its a bit late in the
What are we doing with the current release right now?
who is having problems and which problems are outstanding??
a single compiler warning issue - in ext/standard/exec.h there must be a
declaration of php_Exec:
int php_Exec(int type, char *cmd, pval *array, pval *return_value);
People
Everyone,
Can I merge this into the current RC? This should not cause
any problems.
What are we doing with the current release right now?
who is having problems and which problems are outstanding??
We have two possible MFH's that people want to do which shouldnt really be
included at this
4. The CGI version of PHP is always built and installed.
I think this should be optional.
Perhaps optionally disabled.. --without-cgi?
James
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Sounds like your debugger was built against a different version of PHP
(4.0.5RC1 or 4.0.4pl1, kill the loading of the debugger from your php.ini to
test and it should not give the error. The zend people will provide a new
debugger build against php 4.0.5 when its released im sure.
- James
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
