On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Somehow it doesn't surprise me that the same people who wanted other
BC-breaking changes (minus perhaps Wez) are in favour of this change as well.
Just for the record, we never had a real vote on php-dev or any of the
other forums, and I don't think
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Mike Robinson wrote:
Wez Furlong writes:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Mike Robinson wrote:
Sorry. There's just no way this should happen.
But it has happened, and it's going stay this way.
Now, if you don't have anything positive to contribute,
please stop stirring up
Hi,
I'm not sure who is in charge of LXR, but would it be possible to make
this tool also parse the extensions available in pear/PECL ? I'm a
struggling newbie in writing PHP extensions and this ability would help a
lot.
Cheers,
Joao
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I did several commits to the FTP extension. Due to the fact that
I do not know how I can document the stuff myself and right now am lacking
the time here is a brief instruction:
The work looks quite cool, however this is
Hi,
Before starting up on this email, please be aware that I'm a newbie in C
programming and especially in PHP extension coding. I tried researching
about my doubt (and even talked with Joey Smith) but couldn't really have
a definite answer.
My ultimate goal for my little PHP extension is to
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Alan Knowles wrote:
this is a good starting place
http://www.php.net/manual/en/zend.php
Yes, I looked on the manual before asking. There isn't a good introduction
on how to do what I want to do in there, and thats why I asked around
before sending the email here.
Ack, sorry. I just found xmms's implementation of the class on the xmms.c
file. Seems like it is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks for the pointers, I appreciate it.
Cheers,
Joao
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Maybe this is eaiser than i think.. but..
Does anyone know how to return http 500 status
from inside an extensiosn or just regular ole
php script.
You mean, besides doing header(500 message here) ?
Joao
--
João Prado Maia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
If everybody had _read_ Zak's initial proposal, they should have noticed
that he wanted to ADD an OO interface:
Create an OO-based wrapper for the MySQL extension.
Then there would would not have been an useless and endless thread.
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Zak Greant wrote:
On 2002-3-01 03:39, Lukas Smith wrote:
Well PHP and MySQL are a very popular combo .. but I do not see a point
in separating the API's even further ... DB API's are a major concern
for myself right now too
It would be really nice to work more in
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:10:26PM +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote :
Hi!
As the new year is over now, can someone be so kind
to compile and release a PHP 4.1.1 for windows?
Please also make the windows file names reflect
the standards.
A
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:49:48PM +0100, Lukas Smith wrote :
From: Joao Prado Maia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
My personal opinion is that the OOP layer idea is pretty bad. Instead
of
having 7 or 8 set of functions to learn, now the newbie
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 10:31:51AM -0500, Joao Prado Maia wrote :
I repeat once again, why not work with Stig and the rest of the PEAR-DEV
guys on this new redesigned PEAR::DB (or whatever it ends up being called)
so in the near future we can
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 16:06 02/01/2002, Björn Schotte wrote:
* Zeev Suraski wrote:
Well, I think that the main motivation for separating the modules away was
the release schedule. I.e., separating the release schedule of each
extension from the release schedule
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Joe Webster wrote:
I have something that I am currently dealing with:
Using mod_perl with apache, you can put this in a apache directive
(vhost, location, directory):
PerlSetVar somevarname somevarval
and that would pre-define somevarname equal to
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Lukas Smith wrote:
Well the problem is that people will want to grow with the specs and use
part of the specs now ...
And in the end they will use the tool that they grew with and they will
use the tool that is not vapourware when the spec is finalized
Anyways SOAP is
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Lukas Smith wrote:
But I think we have pitched the need for SOAP enough now :-)
What's wrong with the SOAP implementation provided by ext/xmlrpc?
Rumour has it, by the way, that a nice PEAR class is underway that
simplifies the use of
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Jon Parise wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:49:02AM -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
I think the following standard extensions should be moved to
PECL:
ext/cybercash
ext/icap
ext/pfpro
ext/yaz
This is definitely not an inclusive list;
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Björn Schotte wrote:
* Derick Rethans wrote:
I just wanted to say that I'll be doing other things for a while, instead
of concentrating on PHP development. This does not mean that I won't
follow mail, but every message with 'bug' in the subject will go to my
Did I
I suggest you to try using PNG format for that functionality. Beware that
ImageTTFText() renders 'blocky' text on JPEGs, but seems to work better in
PNGs.
Oh well.
Joao
On 18 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 14583
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, to be fair they are only worthless on the Windows binary version
that comes with GD 1.6.2. You can always try to compile PHP on your own
though.
Don't get me wrong, this is still a mess :)
Joao
On 18 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ID: 14583
User updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote:
Is anyone reading this list? I haven't heard a thing since last week when I
posted what I think might be a serious bug in the extension (see also
http://bugs.php.net/?id=14521).
I guess people just didn't try the extension yet. I'm also
Hi everyone,
This problem probably doesn't have any fix (or I think I doesn't anyway),
but maybe this email will be useful for other developers that need to
create portable scripts across a wide range of PHP and GD versions.
What I have found, and Rasmus helped me on that a few times over IRC,
On 17 Dec 2001, Johan Persson wrote:
By suggestion from Rasmus L.
To house and develop JpGraph. See www.aditus.nu/jpgraph for a detailed description
of this project.
Woohoo!
Maybe putting Jpgraph on PEAR ? That would kick ass :)
Great work on the library by the way, I use it all the time
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
btw, I see a promised imlib extension for php (http://mmcc.cx/php_imlib/) and seems
to be freezed since january. Anyone knows the authors ? I believe it should be a good
alternative to gd.
Sure, Matt is the author and he is always on #php on
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Sander Roobol wrote:
There is a bug report: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=11813edit=1
in which I suggested the person whoever builds the binary releases
to build two versions of the GD extension..this didn't happen
for some reason.
IMO, the simplest solution to
Yes, thats indeed true. I understand the mess with GD 2.0.1 having a lot
of bugs and everything, but if you are supporting GD2 based functions on
4.0.6 and then take it away on the Windows version of 4.1.0, people are
definetely have problems.
I'm one of those unlucky bastards that have to
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Matthew J Gray wrote:
bind() takes the name of a class and the name of a function and
binds the function to the given class. This is useful to us when
the interface class of a library is a subclass of another class in the
library.
bind() doesn't quite work properly,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, benjamin yates wrote:
a way to create the same as a #define macro... man would that be nice.
define()
define( 'MIN(a,b)', ((a)(b)?(a):(b)) ); ? i don't think so... if you
know a way to do it then you'll be my favorite person for the week :)
is what i was
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Guys, relax. No, this does not work. The only reason your example works
is because min() is a built-in PHP function already.
Hmm, damnit. I hate looking like a fool ;)
Joao
--
João Prado Maia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://phpbrasil.com - php com um
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001, Alexander Wagner wrote:
You have a point here, but you're not necessarily right.
Smarty templates are more complex than IT[X]/PHPlib-style templates,
but still easier than XSL, and not all designers are that dumb.
I
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: WindowsCE
PHP version: 4.1.0
PHP Bug Type: *Mail Related
Bug description: Mail() does not work
so here we are :(
i'd still prefere to have the
I just noticed that the email address that is stored on your databases (or
wherever you keep the information on) is incorrect - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone with the proper permission please change it to
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ?
Thanks,
Joao
--
João Prado Maia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Markus Fischer wrote:
$m45sum = md5_file($f);
I guess you probably meant this:
$md5sum = md5_file('filename');
Joao
--
João Prado Maia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://phpbrasil.com - php com um jeitinho brasileiro
--
Precisando de consultoria em
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Markus Fischer wrote:
Anyone with proper access feeling responsible preventing multiple
submits ? :)
Isn't that something that the developer should handle, and not the
language itself ? Do you know if any other language does something like
that ?
Joao
--
João Prado
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hello,
I think he meant multiple bug report submits here...
Duh! Well, on that case I guess Jan Lehnardt already has the code for that
functionality, as described on his last email to the list.
Can someone grant him access to the appropriate cvs
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Don't you think that on some systems (probably with high loads) it might be
much more efficient to use SMTP than spanning mail via fork()/exec()?
Only in the case of a local smtpd. But yes, in that scenario I agree.
I'm not at all on top of
I was just wondering what ended up being decided about the versioning
scheme that Jani proposed and Andi later on re-proposed a different way of
doing it by using a special function.
I also remember Andi or even Zeev talking about implementing this system
before the release of 4.0.8 (I might be
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think the key still lies in creating a repository for C extensions where
each extension can have its own release cycle.
That is also true, but we still need a reliable way to check for the
version of specific extensions. Having just bumped into an
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I agree completely. We need a way to check what version each extension is.
We have broken BC quite a bit in 4.0.7 so maybe we should add this to 4.0.7
so that we can get this whole external C extension thing going ASAP?
If I could vote on this I
As I said, too less information, and this is probably not a bug. Please
try to ask on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for support questions.
This is probably not a bug ? Are you kidding me ? I hope you are not
closing any real nasty bugs because of this reasoning :)
How can
Can someone take a look into this bug id and see if anything can be done
to fix this problem ? The current report is tagged as 'analyzed' but maybe
the developers overlooked the problem, as it is kind of old (ok, not too
much).
http://www.php.net/bugs.php?id=11536
Cheers,
Joao
--
João Prado
Fine :)
But please someone take a look into this, as I can also reproduce this
problem on Linux / Apache / PHP 4.0.5 and it might be an easy fix
(clueless though). Sinec we are talking about this, did anyone else ever
tried using ticks on Apache under Windows 2000 ?
I get a rather nasty
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jeremy Bettis wrote:
Why is the habit of PHP modules to define functions that might or might not
work depending on library dependancies.
For example, ImageCopyResampled gives this error if libgd 2.0:
ImageCopyResampled required libgd 2.0
But that makes this code
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Joey Smith wrote:
There are 2 parts that are required to make PDF's using pdflib. There is
the pdflib code, and the PHP code that makes calls to the pdflib
code. We can ship our own code, but not pdflib's.
And that is what I'm talking about here. Changing only the PHP
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Joey Smith wrote:
Surely you are kidding.
I cannot see in any of our packages where we bundle the PDF library with
our release. If we are, we should probably remove it.
In either case, there is no way we can compile an unencumbered version
of PDFLib. That would be
, but it is still a serious problem.
Joao Prado Maia
---
ATTENTION! Do NOT reply to this email!
To reply, use the web interface found at http://bugs.php.net/?id=11818edit=2
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Sascha Schumann wrote:
I was refering to the 'unary operator expected' errors.
..which was an effect of your broken installation, as
ltmain.sh and ltconfig/libtool.m4 were incompatible, and
hence produced spurious errors.
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Yes, that's true. I did ask (couple of times) before
I committed that patch. And yes, now both and ; are
considered as arg separators.
And I'd like to think that it's a feature than bug. ;)
That would be true, if PHP would be some kind
Hello,
I just found a rather bad typo on the 'links.php' page and while trying to
fix it myself it showed up that I don't have enough karma. Can someone
pump my karma up a little bit ?
The username is 'jpm'.
Cheers,
Joao
--
Joo Prado Maia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://phpbrasil.com - php com um
50 matches
Mail list logo
