Re: [VOTE] Core Committee Election

1. Korvin Szanto 2. Chris Tankersley 3. Enrico Zimuel 4. Ben Edmunds 5. Massimiliano Arione Thanks, Michael On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, 8:42 am Alessandro Lai, wrote: > Hello everyone, > as specified in the previous thread ( > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/php-fig/te-IAmuZte0/discussion), >

Re: [VOTE][CC][BYLAW] PSR evolution

+1 -- Michael C On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 09:48, Alessandro Lai wrote: > Hello everyone, > after a long review phase of my PR and multiple fixes and amendments, I > think it's now ready: > > https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pull/1195 > > The PR adds a new document that addresses the

Re: [VOTE] [Accept] PSR-12 Extended Coding Style Guide

+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [ACCEPTANCE VOTE][CC] PSR-14 Event Dispatcher

ed/event-dispatcher-meta.md > > > PLEASE DO NOT VOTE UNLESS YOU ARE A CC MEMBER. > Current CC Members are as follows: > > Beau Simensen > Larry Garfield > Matthew Weier O’Phinney > Sara Golemon > Cees-Jan Kiewiet > Lukas Kahwe Smith > Samantha Quiñones > Chris

Re: [VOTE][WG] PSR-12 Readiness Vote

required for passage. Though I hope to see a unanimous >>> decision before we continue. >>> >>> -- >>> The current working group for PSR-12 is as follows: >>> >>> Editor: >>> Korvin Szanto >>> >>> Sponsor: >

Re: [ACCEPTANCE VOTE][CC] PSR-18 HTTP Client

/master/proposed/http-client/ht >> >> tp-client-meta.md >> >> >> >> PLEASE DO NOT VOTE UNLESS YOU ARE A CC MEMBER. >> >> Current CC Members are as follows: >> >> >> >> Beau Simensen >> >> Larry Garfield >> &

[DISCUSSION] PSR-18 HTTP Client Acceptance Vote

Hi, One of the core requirements for a specification to proceed from review and be fully accepted is the demonstration of multiple full implementations. No such implementations are mentioned in the metadoc or vote. Could references to some implementations please be provided (and they should also

Re: [ENTRANCE] [VOTE] [CC] PHPDoc & PHPDoc Tags PSRs

Vote 1: Yes Vote 2: Yes -- Michael On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, 11:56 am Larry Garfield, wrote: > PSR-5: Yes > PSR-19: Yes > > --Larry Garfield > > On Friday, September 14, 2018 12:40:02 PM CDT Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > PSR-5 has been quiet fo

[ENTRANCE] [VOTE] [CC] PHPDoc & PHPDoc Tags PSRs

-standards/blob/master/proposed/phpdoc-tags-meta.md *Working group for both PSRs:* Editor: Chuck Burgess - PEAR Sponsor: Michael Cullum - PHP-FIG Alexey Gopachenko - PhpStorm Matthew Brown - Psalm Ondrej Mirtes - PHPStan Please when voting specify votes for both for example: Vote 1 (PHPDoc PSR-5

Re: [ACCEPTANCE VOTE][CC] PSR-17 HTTP Message Factories

+1 -- Michael C On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 10:09 am Lukas Kahwe Smith, wrote: > +1 > > On 18 Jul 2018, at 23:16, Matthew Weier O'Phinney < > mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-17, HTTP Message Factories, hit its > minimum required duration on 2018-07-05. At

Re: [VOTE] Secretary Elections - Voting is Now!

1. Alessandro Lai 2. Ian Littman -- Michael C On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 at 10:58, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Jackalope votes > > > On 4 Aug 2018, at 18:36, Dead Lugosi wrote: > > > > Alessandro Lai > > Daniyal Hamid > > PS: Not sure if I am still/also eligible to vote as a CC member? > > -- > You

Re: PSR-9/10

Great! Welcome to the team. Many thanks, Michael On Sun, 27 May 2018, 2:34 pm Chris Cornutt, <eny...@phpdeveloper.org> wrote: > Hey Michael, > I'd love to be back in on this one and help push the project on. > > -chris > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Michael Cullum

PSR-9/10

Group? - * Michael Cullum - Editor & Symfony Security Lead * Larry Garfield - PSR-9 CC Sponsor * Korvin Szanto - PSR-10 CC Sponsor * Michael Hess - Drupal Security Lead * Adam Englander The working group are the group of people who are invo

Re: [PSR-14][Entrance][VOTE]

+1 On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, 10:02 am Stefano Torresi, wrote: > +1 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email

Re: [PSR-6][Errata][Vote]

+1 -- Michael C On 14 March 2018 at 20:59, Chris Tankersley wrote: > +1 > > -Chris Tankersley > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:22 PM Larry Garfield > wrote: > >> Take 3, or 4, or something... >> >> This is a Core Committee vote to merge the

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Now that Gary is no longer involved with Jetbrains it might be wise to get some other IDE/CS-fixer-style tool representation in the working group. Michael On 13 Feb 2018 10:20 am, "'Alexander Makarov' via PHP Framework Interoperability Group" wrote: I'm still

Re: [CC nomination] Michael Cullum

to represent the community's views on the core committee. Many thanks, Michael C On Wednesday, 10 January 2018 16:05:40 UTC, Alexander Makarov wrote: > > I hereby nominate Michael Cullum for the Core Committee. > > Michael was both involved in actual PSRs and was group secretary for two

[Internal] January Secretary & Core Committee Elections

: - *1st: Nominations open* - 11th: Nominations close - *12th: Vote begins * - *26th: Vote ends * - *28th: New secretary/CC members in post* The people whos terms are expiring are: - Secretary: Michael Cullum - CC Member: Chris Tankersley - CC Member: Graham Daniels - CC Member

Re: [WG][VOTE] PSR-15 Review

The time period is two weeks or until the everyone has voted according to the voting protocol bylaw. The vote should also have been opened by the Editor, not Sponsor, as per the bylaws but I know Woody supported this due to previous discussions so unless anyone objects then it should be fine.

New Secretaries

Hi all, I can formally announce the two new secretary candidates are: 1. Margret (Term until May 2019) 2. Alessandro (Term until August 2018) The threshold was 7 votes, and they received 11 and 9 votes respectively. As they both met the threshold in the first round there were no surplus

Re: [VOTE][WG] PSR-12 Readiness Vote

decision before we continue. -- The current working group for PSR-12 is as follows: Editor: Korvin Szanto Sponsor: Chris Tankersley Members: Alexander Makarov Michael Cullum Robert Deutz Please do not reply to this thread unless your name is listed above. Thanks, Korvin -- You recei

Re: Should new PSRs support PHP5?

Oscar, This was discussed on Slack however those there agreed it didn't make sense to do releasing new version of the interface for each PHP version. The reason being as then you have a client application that has one library requiring one version, and another library requiring another version

Re: [VOTE][CC] Entrance vote for PSR-12: Extended Coding Style Guide

Core Commitee votes only please, not project representatives. -- Michael C On 20 October 2017 at 08:47, Paul Dragoonis wrote: > > > On 20 Oct 2017 4:38 pm, "Sara Golemon" wrote: > > On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 2:39:36 PM UTC-4, Korvin Szanto wrote:

[VOTE] Secretary Election

ays of calculating the vote reallocation for STV and many are inaccurate, our methods are dictated in the bylaws. Good luck to all the candidates! -- Many thanks, Michael Cullum FIG Secretary [1]: STV User-friendly Explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI [2]: https://en.

Re: [Secretary nomination] Mark Railton

Nomination acknowledged. If anyone has any questions for Mark, please feel free to ask in this topic. -- Michael C On 21 September 2017 at 15:06, Mark Railton wrote: > Thank you Joe, I accept your nomination. > > For those that may not know me, I'm currently one of the

Re: [Internal] Secretary Election Calendar and Nominations Open

secretaries meeting including those newly elected If anyone has any objections, please say. -- Michael On 4 September 2017 at 19:54, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > The boat was unfortunately missed at the beginning of the last month in >

Re: [Internal] Secretary Election Calendar and Nominations Open

Vote closes on the 6th October*. Apologies for that typo. -- Michael C On 14 September 2017 at 13:36, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm going to be extending the nomination period by 7 days due to a lack of > nominations so far so

Re: PSR-9 and 10 thoughts

Apologies for the recent spam; unfortunately there's not a huge amount we can do other than be reactionary to such things due to the platform. I've banned the user in question and deleted their messages from Google groups. Many thanks, Michael On 8 Sep 2017 8:43 pm, wrote:

Re: [Internal] Secretary Election Calendar and Nominations Open

starting on the *15th September.* ? -- Woody Gilk http://about.me/shadowhand On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > The boat was unfortunately missed at the beginning of the last month in > order to get the ball rolling

[Internal] Secretary Election Calendar and Nominations Open

Hi all, The boat was unfortunately missed at the beginning of the last month in order to get the ball rolling according to the bylaws for how a secretary election must be held within a month so it was moved to this month, this should have been communicated on the mailing list as well as

A period of quiet, but now, rejuvenation

Hi all, I think there is little denying that the FIG has been quieter than last year in this year to date. A variety of factors have contributed to this based primarily around the fact a number of the most active drivers within the FIG have had other life events occur which has taken time away

Re: [VOTE] First Core Committee Elections

-elected un-eliminated candidates remaining. Korvin, Chris, Graham and Stefano are therefore elected. -- Michael C On 24 December 2016 at 20:35, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just posted the results in a new thread. I said we'd try to get th

First Core Committee Members!

Smith - Samantha Quiñones - Cees-Jan Kiewiet - Gary Hockin *Third Four Candidates (Until January 2018):* - Chris Tankersley - Graham Daniels - Korvin Szanto - Stefano Torresi -- Michael Cullum FIG Secretary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [VOTE] First Core Committee Elections

into the new year. -- Michael C On 24 December 2016 at 00:57, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > Voting has now closed. I'll hopefully have the results to announce at some > point later today. > > -- > Michael > -- You received this message because you are subscri

Re: [VOTE] First Core Committee Elections

née On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 11:47:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: > Hi all, > > We’ve finally got to the voting stage in the first set of Core Committee > Elections where 12 CC members will be elected to staggered terms. >

[VOTE] First Core Committee Elections

814f16f#note-to-candidates> . Many thanks, Michael Cullum [1]: STV User-friendly Explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework

Re: [PSR-12]

This would be really useful data if you're willing/able to provide it. It would provide a useful aid to the survey results will be coming out soon (Korvin and I are just finishing up a report on it) but the results weren't in favour of it being on the same line. M On Dec 8, 2016 3:11 PM, "GeeH"

Re: [CC Nomination] Chris, Tobias, Sam, Beau, Marc, Steve

Beau and Tobias were already nominated. All the others have already posted to the mailing list asking for nominations except Sam so I don't see any reason not to acknowledge them immediately (So consider this as acknowledgement). Sam, could you please respond before voting opens on the 9th (so

Re: [CC][Nomination] Jeremy Coates

Jeremy appears to be having email issues at this moment in time but has reached out to me to say he wishes to accept so nomination acknowledged. M On Dec 7, 2016 7:32 PM, "Matthew Weier O'Phinney" wrote: I hereby nominate Jeremy Coates (@phpcodemonkey) for a position

[Internals] Change to FIG 3.0 term lengths

Hi all, It was noted by a few individuals that the way the bylaws stand about fulfilling the initial 12 Core Committee roles as if there is a 12-member vacancy this leads to a rather inefficient situation where some people would have their terms expire in April/May of this year which I'm sure you

[Internals] Reminder of CC nomination deadline

Hi all, *Just a reminder that any CC nominations must be in by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday 7th December.* I will also, around this time (when nominations close), post up a preliminary list of community members who are eligible to vote (in addition to all project representatives who have automatic

Presence at php[world]

Hi all, There are quite a number of us at php[world] this year and the kind/awesome/generous/{insert nice adjective here} folks at php[architect] have given us a some space for both a FIG meeting and a FIG Q session (Similar to what was done earlier in the year at Midwest PHP). *The meeting

Re: [CC][Nomination] David Négrier

Thanks David & Michiel. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Michael C On 9 November 2016 at 16:43, David Négrier wrote: > Woot! Thanks a lot Michiel. I obviously accept your nomination. :) > > -- > David. > > Le mercredi 9 novembre 2016 20:43:01 UTC+1, Michiel

Re: [CC][Nomination] Lukas Kahwe Smith

Thanks Fabien & Lukas. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Michael C On 10 November 2016 at 04:30, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > > On 10 Nov 2016, at 01:13, Fabien Potencier > wrote: > > > > I hereby nominate Lukas Smith for the Core

Re: [CC][Nomination] Matthew O'Phinney

Thanks Larry & Matthew. Recieved. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Michael C On 8 November 2016 at 17:38, Matthew Weier O'Phinney < mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2016 4:33 PM, "Larry Garfield" wrote: > > > > Since no one else seems to be doing so,

Re: [Internals][FIG 3.0] Extending Nomination Period & Delaying FIG 3.0 Transition

rly December? > > --Larry Garfield > > > On 11/09/2016 11:08 AM, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee nomination > period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0 implementation timetable back a > month (so the

Re: [CC][Nomination] Graham Daniels

Hi all, I'm not going to lock this topic because it's a nomination topic and people might still wish to ask valid questions to Graham however I entirely agree that the tone of this topic has gone in a direction nobody wishes to see. The nomination stands as there is no platform for 'rejecting a

Re: [CC][Nomination] Samantha Quiñones

Korvin, I don't see an option to prevent deleting own posts, only an option to prevent editing own posts (which is already restricted). If anyone knows how to do this please feel free to ping me or another Secretary in private. -- Michael C On 8 November 2016 at 19:51, Korvin Szanto

Re: [Internals] [FIG 3.0 Transition] Core Committee Nominations Open

rseeing the process, but are part of the process. Do they now get to >> vote as well? >> >> Seriously not trying to cause trouble, just looking for clarity. >> >> Regards, >> Adam Culp >> >> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 1:47:04 PM UTC-4

Re: Who can vote in CC elections?

bylaw for more information. Thanks, FIG Secretaries On Sunday, 6 November 2016 14:53:48 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just a quick note/reminder that community members who are active in the > FIG may be eligible to vote in the upcoming Core Committe

Who can vote in CC elections?

Hi all, Just a quick note/reminder that community members who are active in the FIG may be eligible to vote in the upcoming Core Committee elections. We (the secretaries) are currently compiling a list of people which we'll post shortly but if you think you might be entitled to vote (the main

Re: [CC][Nomination] Samantha Quiñones

I was going to address this once Samantha had accepted the nomination however it appears pertinent now. The bylaws say Secretaries can stand in CC elections but they must resign if they are successful. -- Thanks, Michael C On 5 Nov 2016 8:18 p.m., "Christopher Pitt" wrote: >

Re: [CC Nomination] Sara Golemon

Thanks Larry & Sara. Recieved. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Thanks, FIG Secretaries On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 02:08:38 UTC+1, Sara Golemon wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 5:12:21 PM UTC-7, Larry Garfield wrote: >> >> Although she hasn't been especially active in FIG to

Re: [CC Nomination] Gary Hockin

Recieved. Thanks Gary & Matthew. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Thanks, FIG Secretaries On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 20:40:48 UTC+1, Gary Hockin wrote: > > Thank you Matthew! > > I accept the nomination. > > Gary > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 7:03:27 PM UTC, Matthew Weier

Re: [CC][Nomination] Graham Daniels

Recieved. Thanks Graham & Matthew. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Thanks, FIG Secretaries On Friday, 4 November 2016 02:53:05 UTC+1, greyd...@gmail.com wrote: > > Thank you very much. I gladly accept the nomination. > > -- Graham > -- You received this message because you are

Re: [CC Nomination] Jason Coward

Recieved. Thanks Korvin & Jason. http://bit.ly/cc-election-candidates -- Thanks, FIG Secretaries On Thursday, 3 November 2016 18:46:57 UTC+1, Korvin Szanto wrote: > > Hi All, > Yesterday Jason appealed to the group [1] requesting to be nominated to > run for the core committee. Now I don't

Re: [Internals] [FIG 3.0 Transition] Core Committee Nominations Open

members. -- Many thanks The FIG Secretaries On 1 Nov 2016 11:43 p.m., "Michael Cullum" <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The nominations for the Core Committee open today. Below are some details > and FAQs. > > Anyone can be nominated (including Secr

[Internals] FIG 3.0 Implementation and Transition Timetable; Core Committee Elections

Hi all, The FIG 3.0 vote ended yesterday evening in what will mark a significant event in the FIG’s history, this is a time for us all to come together, and work together, to pursue the common aims of this group which we now define in our bylaws, and put aside political differences of past

Re: [Review][Discuss] FIG 3.0 Upcoming Vote

The Secretary role is not changing in FIG 3.0 as previously stated. -- Michael On 12 Sep 2016 4:51 p.m., "Paul Jones" wrote: > Hi all, > > Larry & Michael, is the "Secretary" role intended primarily as that of > "assistant", subordinate to the Voting Members, or is it

Re: [PRE-VOTE DISCUSSION] Withdraw PSR-8

On 12 September 2016 at 16:15, Paul Jones wrote: > > > On Sep 11, 2016, at 11:45, Adam Culp wrote: > > > > The additional commentary about Michael was not really needed. Poor form. > > I am duly chastised; I regret the poor form. > > FWIW, my intent

Google groups spam detection

Hi all, Just a quick FYI, google groups sometimes holds back messages and requires a group moderator (Secretaries) to approve your message, even for long-time members. I note it seems to have got more aggressive as of late (I know at least myself, Adam and Jordi have had messages held in the

Re: Resigning My Position ...

gt; > On Sep 9, 2016, at 10:08, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > > > > We [secretaries] discussed PSR-8 a while back and we've also been part > of numerous conversations with Larry [PSR-8 Editor] and other folks and we > came to the conclusion that

Re: [Review][Discuss] FIG 3.0 Upcoming Vote

piled the secretary job description initially in the bylaws to explain why things were written as they were, but not to advocate for them. I do this in line with my declared conflicts of interest. -- Michael C On 5 September 2016 at 17:37, Paul Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael

Re: [REVIEW] PSR-13: Link definition interfaces

As a general secretarial note, the minimum 2 week review period is now complete as of the 30th August and this can be put to a vote at any time from this point onwards. -- Michael C On 1 September 2016 at 22:47, Larry Garfield wrote: > On 09/01/2016 02:34 PM, Woody Gilk

Re: [VOTE] PSR-6 Errata

Voted Positive 8% Percentage of Members Voted Negative 21% Sponsor/Vote Starter Larry Garfield Secretary/Returning Officer Michael Cullum Finish Date 12/08/2016 Passing (Over 50% of cast votes & Quorum) No Over 50% of Members Voted Positive No A full tally is viewable on the FIG voting sheet here &

Re: [Review][Discuss] FIG 3.0 Upcoming Vote

the FIG 'is' or 'should be' or 'is not'. It is up to the member projects to decide by majority vote, as is our way. -- Michael C On 28 August 2016 at 22:07, Paul Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 24, 2016, at 00:13, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com>

Re: [FIG 3.0] Need clarifications about core committee

/001-voting-protocol.md -- Michael Cullum FIG Secretary On 24 August 2016 at 22:26, Alessandro Lai <alessandro.la...@gmail.com> wrote: > Larry, it think that the part about vote rounding is not clear enough; > it's understandable through the examples, but the rule is somewhat

Re: [VOTE] Secretary Election August 2016

A reminder this vote ends very soon: *23:59 UTC on the 26th August* -- Michael C PHP FIG Secretary On Monday, 22 August 2016 15:01:09 UTC+8, Leo Feyer wrote: > > Contao: > > Amanda Folson > Samantha Quiñones > Jonathan Reinink > Matthew 'Matt' Trask > Phil Sturgeon > Paul 'PMJ' Jones > >

[Review][Discuss] FIG 3.0 Upcoming Vote

Hi all, I pulled the vote for FIG 3.0 in order to give people a chance to provide more feedback as people expressed a wish to give it a bit more time. *The vote will open on the 10th September.* To quote from my previous post: Ultimately, if FIG 3.0 is to go through, it's going to be a huge

Re: [VOTE] "FIG 3.0" Bylaw amendments

on the 10th September to allow for any final review and comments before that point (I'd stress that feedback is really important to the proposal and it's still of course open for changes based on feedback such as when referenda was added to the proposal). Many thanks, Michael Cullum -- Michael C

Re: Questions on some coding styles

If this was discussed for PSR-1/2 then intentionally omitted, especially if for reasons of contention, then it's out of scope for PSR-12 which should only *clarify statements that were incorrect or or unintentionally unambiguous* in PSR-1/2, and things that *relate to new functionality* added

Re: [PSR-13] Ready for Review

can start the minimum two week review period. -- Many thanks, Michael Cullum FIG Secretary On 14 August 2016 at 19:48, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > As Editor of PSR-13, I hereby turn PSR-13 over to our Coordinator, > Matthew, and declare it ready for Review. > &

Re: [Nomination] FIG Secretary: Paul M. Jones

something for Member Projects to decide; so if PMJ is elected then a vote can be held after the election result but before PMJ takes office. -- Michael Cullum FIG Secretary On 11 August 2016 at 21:32, <greyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was under the impression that previous precedent was pre

Re: [Internals] Secretary Declarations of Conflicts of Interest

have highlighted that other connections (personal and project related) should be posted. I am also a team member at phpBB (Something I am hardly discreet about on the FIG Mailing List, feel free to do a search for 'Michael Cullum phpBB', I used to sometimes post from mich...@phpbb.com, I said

Re: [Nomination] FIG Secretary: Phil Sturgeon

Thanks Phil and Jordi. Nomination received. -- Michael C FIG Secretary On 11 August 2016 at 15:08, Phil Sturgeon wrote: > Thanks Jordi, I do of course humbly accept! > > Adam: I love a bit of Q, let's have it: > > 1. Why did you accept the nomination? > > As an ex-FIG

Re: [Nomination] FIG Secretary: Amanda Folson

Thanks Amanda and Larry. Nomination received. -- Michael C FIG Secretary On 11 August 2016 at 21:44, Amanda Folson wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Thanks for the great questions. I'll answer them in order. > > *1. Why did you accept the nomination?* > I accepted the nomination

Re: [Nomination] Fig Secretary - Matthew Trask

Thanks Matt and Graham. Nomination received. -- Michael C FIG Secretary On 11 August 2016 at 14:25, Matt Trask wrote: > 1. Why did you accept the nomination? I accepted because I want to be > involved. I want to get in with a fresh face and fresh eyes and offer new >

Re: FIG 3.0 (Including a TL;DR Summary)

On 5 August 2016 at 20:24, Paul Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 5, 2016, at 14:01, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > A vote for FIG 3.0 is [potentially/hopefully] getting closer and one big > th

Re: [PSR-12] Do not enforce blank line after

As with everything in PSR-12, I'm wary of BC-breaks and want to make this a nice upgrade path from PSR-2; that said, this won't hit git commit history of projects too much (it's not modifying lines of code, just adding one) so I'm +1 for picking one. With regards to what to pick, I think that

Re: Status of PSR-12 survey

and premise of the PSR when it passed an entrance vote. https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/proposed/extended-coding-style-guide-meta.md#2-why-bother -- Thanks, Michael Cullum (Not speaking formally as a FIG Secretary but as former Editor of PSR-12 inline with my declared conflict

Re: Status of PSR-12 survey

issues please email me on i...@php-fig.org. Thanks, Michael Cullum PHP FIG Secretary -- Michael C On 31 July 2016 at 15:35, glen-84 <glen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that non-members can no longer access the IRC channel, so I'll > ask here: Is there any news WRT t

Usage of our git (php-fig/fig-standards) repository

to merging in that pull request. Many thanks, Michael Cullum FIG Secretary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fi

Re: [Internal] Secretary August Election

and the likes) about this so we have a good selection of candidates from different parts of the php community, that would be much appreciated. -- Michael Cullum FIG Secretary On 29 June 2016 at 23:31, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a few words about the up

Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

Okay, thanks Paul for your response. I will put this to a vote on Tuesday; currently I am at a conference in Barcelona and Samantha is on php[cruise] so our availability and access is limited. If anyone wishes to make any closing remarks, you are welcome to do so before then, but I'd ask that

Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

Paul, Most here would like to move on and this is rather dragging out. Could you please respond to the suggestions made by others in this topic which have been summarised, either to refuse them or to accept them. Many thanks, The Secretaries On Thursday, 21 July 2016 13:46:49 UTC+2, Anthony

Re: [VOTE] Membership Application: pimcore

For administrative/record-keeping purposes: - Sponsors can vote so this is counted. The sponsor is the rep, the vote is from the project. - As an amendment to the first post, this is a formal vote. I believe "I am not calling for a formal vote on the matter" was a typo. Thanks, The

Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

be put to a vote. I do not think anyone involved wishes this to drag on too much longer. To quickly address some points made directly towards the secretaries, avoiding them from being left unanswered: On 9 July 2016 at 17:26, Brandon Lamb <brandonl...@gmail.com> wrote: @Michael Cullum -

Re: Switch to forum software?

Hi Scott, A normal forum poll would be inadequate as polls don't necessarily have a full record of votes, of vote changes etc. They also don't handle things like Single Transferable Vote. Thanks, Michael On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:21:12 UTC+1, scott molinari wrote: > > A good forum software

Re: Github Permissions Update

:32 UTC+1, Paul Dragoonis wrote: > > All of a sudden my RW access to the website got removed. Can this be > reinstated please. Thanks. > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Michael Cullum <m...@michaelcullum.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've just

Github Permissions Update

Hi all, I've just done a bit of updating with regards to github permissions. Those who should have access to things (Ping me if you don't): - Every Draft or Review PSR has it's sponsor, editor and coordinator with write access to php-fig/fig-standards, so long as they are voting

Re: [Internal] [Discussion] Paul M Jones

Robert, Off the top of my head (without digging through every medium and logs of each instance we were contacted) I think almost all were asking explicitly for expulsion and almost all [including Mike] also saw the email draft to make sure it was not conveying anything they had not intended. It